HomeMy WebLinkAbout1988-09-29
..-~~
Town of Nantucket
Conservation Commission
Town and County Building
Nantucket, Massachusetts 02554
AGENDA FOR SEPTEMBER 29, 1988
A. PUBLIC HEARINGS
I'
1. Stephen R. Swift - SEi!8-501 - 10 Old Quidnet Milk Route (20-8.5)
2. William & Marilee Matteson - SEl.t8-511 - 105 Baxter Road (i!8-15)
3. Michael Bloomberg - SEl.t8-512 - 7 st. Elmo Lane (i!9-185)
l.t. Kermit Roosevelt, Jr. et al - Baxter Road (73.1.i!-11.1 & 11.2)
5. Roy Bailey - 82 Union Street (55.1.l.t-l.t0)
6. Mary S. Huffman - Jefferson Ave. (30-i!5 & l.t6)
B. REGULAR MEETING
1. Requests for Determination
a. Linda Loring - Eel Point Road (39-2)
b. E. Crosby Willet - ~ Monomoy Creek Road (5i!-1l.t7)
c. James and Barbara Lamberton - Lily St. (i!2.l.t.3-96 & 97)
2. Orders of Conditions
a. Richard Corkish, Jr. - SEi!8-509 - 320 Polpis Road (2i!-13)
3. Extension Permit
a. Jellerne - SEi!8-338 - W. Chestr (i!1-l.t83) and change in plans
i!. Planning Board Referral
a. B & G Properties - betw. Sparks Ave & Orange St
5. Other Business
a. Brushcutting estimate for Long Pond property
b. Austin Farms - SE48-336 (56-54) -detention basin
c. Consue Springs Gazebo - advertise for bids to demolish?
d. Announcement: new apps. must have copy of deed; receipt of
recording must be returned to Con Com office; bylaw ammendmt
effective today, abutters to be notified by applicant
e. Greenhill study - Sesach. Pond - ConCom vote for $ contrib.
f. Taylor pier - SEl.t8-397 (29-10) - discussion
g. Confirm addresses for Hernpleman complaint
h. Comments, questions from press and public
6. Correspondence
7. Minutes of September 15, 1988
8. Bills to be paid
9. Field Inspections - set date
a. Wauwinet House
b. B & G Properties - Planning Board Referral
c. Thomas and Mary Crowell - 16 Tennessee Ave. - RFD
C. EXECUTIVE SESSION - regarding litigation
-.....
-~i
Town of Nantucket
Conservation Commission
Town and County Building
Nantucket, Massachusetts 02554
Minutes of September 29, 1988 Page 1
MINUTES OF SEPTEMBER 29, 1988
The public meeting of September 29, 1988 was called to order at 7:33 PM.
Members present were: William Willet - Chairman, Lee Dunn, Carl
Borchert and Henry Wasierski. Members absent were: Donald Visco, Peter
Dunwiddie and Granville Cranston. Administrator present: Ben McKelway.
Recording Secretary: Marcia Litchfield.
A. PUBLIC HEARINGS
1. Stephen R. Swift - SEl.t8-501 - 10 Old Quidnet Milk Route
(20-8.5). Mr. Swift representing himself stated he had yet to
meet with the Mass. Natural Heritage and Endangered Species
Program expert to discuss the status of Spotted Turtles on the
lot and the potential impact of the project on their habitat.
Because some data may not be collected before April - June 1989
when the area is wettest and the turtles are most active, Mr.
Swift requested a long-term continuance of the hearing for a
period of 6 months. He expressed his desire to carry out the
project as carefully as possible and said he was in no great
rush.
He also submitted 2 additional maps justifying his choice of a
driveway route. He said the MNHESP may not have up-to-date
information about Spotted Turtles in the area, but admitted the
burden of proof was his. Mr. Swift felt he had gone beyond what
was necessary to protect the habitat, had allowed for both
adequate water movement and minimum impact on the Spotted
Turtles, and had hoped to keep disturbance of the canopy to a
minimum. He noted the proposed culverts were ~ times larger
than necessary, adding that the approx. cost of doing a bridge
instead would be well over $100,000.
Mr. Swift said he had approached the 5 abutters from whom he
would need an easement if he tried to relocate the access,
however only 2 provided a positive response. Lee Dunn felt that
since the lot had been purchased before the regulations took
effect, the ConCom was obligated to allow him access to the lot.
-~
;
Town of Nantucket
Conservation Commission
Town and County Building
Nantucket, Massachusetts 02554
Minutes of September 29, 1988 Page 2
Lee asked him to look more closely at building a bridge thinking
it would provide freer movement underneath for both water and
turtles. Mr. Swift again highlighted the loading problems and
potential damage from heavy equipment involved in building a
bridge. Lee thought, though, that filling 18,000 sq. ft. of
wetland in order to float the driveway was excessive. Carl
Borchert concurred by saying the Commission's main concern was
the amount of swamp to be destroyed or altered.
Mr. Swift said he would address those and the other issues ln
the 6 months ahead and requested a copy of the minutes of Sept.
1, 1988 for his reference. A motion was made to continue the
hearing for 6 months. The motion was carried.
2. William and Marilee Matteson - SEl.t8-511 - 105 Baxter Road
(l.t8-15). Chris Dallrnus of Design Associates was present as
agent for the applicant with Les Smith of Daylor Consulting
Group. Mr. Dallrnus gave a brief description of the project and
mentioned 2 changes from the plans originally submitted: 1) the
house will be relocated to within 6 ft. of the property line and
2) the floor elevation will drop to 106.3 ft. The modified site
plan had already been approved by the HDC and Board of Appeals.
Mr. Dallmus wished to clarify the fact that some fill would be
brought in to maintain the elevation. After reading a recent
field inspection, the Commission saw no problem with the
application and instructed Ben McKelway to send a letter stating
the applicant may begin work immediately. A motion was made to
close the hearing. The motion was carried.
3. Michael Bloomberg - SEi!8-512 - 7 St. Elmo Lane (i!9-185). Les
Smith of Daylor Consulting Group was present as agent for the
applicant. He said Mr. Bloomberg had a p~rchase and sales
agreement for this lot pending ConCom approval of this
application. Daylor's wetlands biologists Lisa Stanley and Mary
Trudeau were inventorying the site for rare species.
There was discussion about drainage and sewerage in the area as
well as a non-specific amount of fill needed for the project.
i
""""
Town of Nantucket
Conservation Commission
Town and County Building
Nantucket, Massachusetts 02554
Minutes of September 29, 1988 Page 3
The Commission was very concerned that the house was to be
relocated only 12 ft. away from the wetland edge. The location
and length of a ditch running through several lots was
discussed. Mr. Smith said the drainage problem exists because
of some illegal filling in the past.
Henry Wasierski and Lee Dunn both thought the applicant should
be able to reposition the moved house on the lot to be further
away from the wetland and allow at least a 25 ft. undisturbed
buffer. Others felt this house was oversized for such a small
lot. Lee said the act of transporting the house over the wet
area would really dig it up. Mr. Smith suggested using
removable mats during transport, but Lee didn't think it would
be practical. In order for the application to be approved as
proposed, a waiver would be necessary.
Mr. Smith wanted to leave the hearing knowing whether or not his
client would be allowed to relocate his house on this lot in
some way. He agreed to check on setback requirements in the
area. There was discussion about asking the applicant to
consider purchasing a more suitable lot, using matting rather
than filling over the route used to transport the house, and the
need for a waiver from ConCom regulations if carried out as
proposed. Carl Borchert and Bill Willet did not see an argument
for hardship on the part of the applicant, nor did they feel the
lot was unbuildable. The general view was that a smaller house
and different driveway would be acceptable for this lot.
Mr. Smith wanted to continue the hearing in order to discuss the
options with the applicant. A motion was made to continue the
hearing at the applicant's request. The motion was carried.
i!. Kermit Roosevelt, Jr. et al - 3 Baxter Road (73.1.i!-11.1 &
11.2). John Shugrue was present as agent for the applicant.
The results of a recent field inspection were read.
Mr. Shugrue said the existing septic system had failed. The
applicant proposed to install an ejector pump and tie into the
town sewer. Mr. Shugrue stated the trench would be dug by
hand.
--..
. -"''':
Town of Nantucket
Conservation Commission
Town and County Building
Nantucket, Massachusetts 02554
Minutes of September 29, 1988 Page l.t
A motion was made to continue the hearing for a DEQE file
number. The motion was carried.
5. Roy Bailey - 82 Union Street (55.1.l.t-i!0). Roy Bailey was
present with his agent Tina Coughanour of rEP. The results of a
recent field inspection were read noting the need for a waiver
if carried out as proposed.
Ms. Coughanour described the project to build a 350 sq. ft.
addition measuring 18 X 20 ft to be located on the Consue
Springs pond side of the lot. She pointed out that the major
source of erosion at the pond bank was feral duck and human foot
traffic. The applicant requested a waiver and felt the project
would not have any adverse effect on the resource area.
Lee Dunn and Henry Wasierski thought the addition could be
turned around to allow more distance between it and the pond.
Mr. Bailey said there wasn't enough space to do that. Carl
Borchert on the other hand thought this application was a prime
candidate for a waiver because no resource would be negatively
impacted. Lee and Henry thought this would only make a bad
situation worse in this particular location. Lee read from the
regulations about waivers. Henry said the applicant must prove
there is no other suitable alternative location for the
addition. Lee agreed to take another look at the site. A
request was made to include in the minutes the conditions
necessary for granting a waiver under the local regulations:
The Commission may, in its discretion for good cause
shown, grant waivers from the operation of one or more of
these regulations pursuant to this section. Such waivers
are intended to be granted only in rare and unusual cases,
and shall be granted only in accordance with the provisions
of this section.
"
Town of Nantucket
Conservation Commission
Town and County Building
Nantucket, Massachusetts 02554
Minutes of September 29, 1988 Page 5
A waiver may be granted only for the following reasons
and upon the following conditions:
(a) The Commission may grant a waiver from these
regulations and impose such additional or substituted
requirements as it deems necessary, upon a clear and
convincing showing by the applicant that: 1) there are no
reasonable conditions or alternatives that would allow the
project to proceed in compliance with the regulations;
2) the project, or its natural and consequential effects,
will not have any adverse effect upon any of the Interests
Protected by the By-law. It shall be the responsibility of
the applicant to provide the Commission with any
information which the Commission may in writing request in
order to enable the Commission to ascertain such adverse
effects. The failure of the applicant to furnish any
information which has been so requested shall result in the
denial of a request for a waiver pursuant to this
subsection.
(b) The Commission may grant a waiver from these
regulations when it is necessary to avoid so restricting
the use of the property as to constitute an
unconstitutional taking without compensation. If an
application for a waiver pursuant to this subsection is
received by the Commission, the Commission may request an
opinion from Town Counsel as to whether the application of
these regulations to a particular case will result in such
a taking without compensation.
(c) The Commission may impose additional conditions in
granting a permit pursuant to this Section, including
imposing limits on project size or effect or requiring
other compensatory measures, such as wetland replication.
"'--
Town of Nantucket
Conservation Commission
Town and County Building
Nantucket, Massachusetts 02554
Minutes of September 29, 1988 Page 6
Mr. Bailey agreed to look into alternative siting plans. A
motion was made to continue the hearing for additional
information and a DEQE file number. The motion was carried.
6. Mary S. Huffman - Jefferson Ave. (30-i!5 & ~6). Tina
Coughanour of IEP and John Newman of Newman N. Newman were
present as agents for the applicant. John Greenleaf represented
the Brant Point Civic Association.
After reading the results of a recent field inspection and a
brief description of the project, there was extensive discussion
about the origin and value of the dune to be altered. It was
noted that the square footage amount of dune to be excavated was
incorrectly cited in the Notice of Intent. Ms. Coughanour and
Mr. Newman argued that the dune was not significant to flood
control or storm damage prevention and therefore could be
altered as along as the performance standards were met.
Ben McKelway pointed out that this was a designated barrier
beach. Henry Wasierski was concerned about setting a precedent
and was dead set against impeding dune movement. He thought the
setback from the dune now should be no closer than was allowed
in 1976 with the original application (SEi!8-3, Map 30 Parcel
121). There was discussion about movement of sand over the
parking lot and roads and its routine clearing by bulldozer.
Mr. Greenleaf was concerned about wetland scenic views impact
for residents in the area. Ms. Coughanour said the ridge lines
are no higher than other dwellings in the area.
Mr. Newman agreed to measure the distance between the existing
house and site of the proposed retaining wall. Ms. Coughanowr
agreed to add the measurement to the plans by the next meeting.
TheCornrnission saw no problems with the addition itself. A
motion was made to continue the hearing for more information
and a DEQE file number. The motion was carried.
-"'''\
Town of Nantucket
Conservation Commission
Town and County Building
Nantucket, Massachusetts 02554
Minutes of September 29, 1988 Page 7
B. REGULAR MEETING
1. Requests for Determination
a. Linda Loring - Eel Point Road (39-2). Ms. Loring was
present. The results of a recent field inspection were read.
Ms. Loring wanted to use work horses dragging hand-forged
claw-scoops and add a simple footbridge to measure 2.5 X 10 ft.
There was discussion about whether this activity would benefit
the wetland conditions. The entire area to be altered would
measure 8 X 20 ft.
A motion was made to issue a negative Determination stating the
work described in the Request is within an Area Subject to
Protection Under the Act, but will not remove, fill, dredge, or
alter that area. Therefore, said work does not require the
filing of a Notice of Intent. The motion was carried.
b. E. Crosby Willet - i! Monomoy Creek Road (5i!-147). Bill
Willet abstained. With Bill not present there was no longer a
quorum. A motion was made to postpone the Determination until
the Oct. 13, 1988 meeting. The motion was carried.
c. James and Barbara Lamberton - Lily St. (l.t2.i!.3-96 & 97).
John Shugrue was present as agent for the applicant. A motion
was made to issue a negative Determination stating the area
described in the Request is not an Area Subject to Protection
Under the Act. The motion was carried.
2. Orders of Conditions
a. Richard Corkish, Jr. - SEl.t8-509 - 320 Polpis Road (24-13).
A motion was made to accept a draft of the Special Conditions as
written and issue them with an Order of Conditions as follows:
i~
Town of Nantucket
Conservation Commission
Town and County Building
Nantucket, Massachusetts 02554
Minutes of September 29, 1988 Page 8
ADDITIONAL SPECIAL CONDITIONS
RICHARD CORKISH, JR.
DEQE FILE NUMBER SEl.t8-509
The project is approved in accordance with the Notice of Intent,
the most recent plans cited on Form 5, the general and special
conditions on Form 5, and the following additional special
conditions:
3. Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Compliance for this
project, the Easement received by the Commission September 29,
1988, or another easement having the same effect, shall be
recorded at the Nantucket Registry of Deeds. A copy of the
recorded easement and plan shall be submitted to the Commission
after they have been recorded.
i!. Prior to any activity at the site, a line of haybales shall be
staked along the upland edge of the established wetland
boundary, or at a higher elevation. After the haybales are
installed, notice shall be given to the Nantucket Conservation
Commission. No work shall begin on the site for i!8 hours after
said notice is given, so as to allow Commission members time to
inspect the haybales and any other siltation devices.
5. The haybale line, erected to mitigate for any siltation which
might wash into the wetland during construction, will also serve
as a limit of construction for work crews. The haybale line
shall remain in good repair during all phases of construction
and it shall not be removed until all soils are stabilized and
seeded or until permission to remove it is given by the
Commission.
6. Natural vegetation between the wetland edge and the project site
will be left intact except where it is necessary to temporarily
use this area. After construction, any disturbed area within
this buffer area will be replanted with native plants.
--.,
Town of Nantucket
Conservation Commission
Town and County Building
Nantucket, Massachusetts 02554
Minutes of September 29, 1988 Page 9
7. Any change made or intended to be made in the plans shall
require the applicant to file a new Notice of Intent or to
inquire of the Conservation Commission in writing whether the
change is substantial enough to require a new filing.
8. An as-built plan, signed and stamped by a registered
professional engineer or land surveyor in the Commonwealth of
Massachusetts, shall be submitted to the Commission at the same
time as a written request for a Certificate of Compliance and
shall specify how the completed plan differs from that shown on
the plans referred to in the Order of Conditions. The as-built
plan shall include, but not be limited to, the following: all
pipe/culvert inverts for inflow and outfalls, pipe slope, size
and composition; location of other drainage structures and their
composition; limits of fill or alteration; location of structure
and pavement within 100 feet of wetland; the edge of the
wetland; the grade contours within 100 feet of the wetland.
9. Members, employees, and agents of the Commission shall have the
right to enter and inspect the premises to evaluate compliance
with the conditions and performance standards stated in this
Order and the Nantucket Wetlands Protection Regulations and may
require the submittal of any data deemed necessary by the
Commission for that evaluation.
10. The applicant, owners, successors or assignees shall be
responsible for maintaining all on-site drainage structures and
outfalls, assuring the lasting integrity of vegetative cover on
the site and site activities so as to prevent erosion,
siltation, sedimentation, chemical contamination or other
detrimental impact to the on-site wetland and/or off-site
resource areas. It shall be the responsibility of the property
owner of record to see that maintenance conditions are complied
with as required by this Order.
11. This document shall be included in all construction contracts
and subcontracts dealing with the work proposed and shall
supersede other contract requirements.
..~
~~llTUCJr~~
~~ )-
'V "1-
t~'~..)
~~. -Ji~
. " .
~- - ..,:l:
""- "\::. - 1.A. ~
"'^ ~ .-.'C)~
~, ........ '"
()IIA ......:.\)..'
ORA1... .......
.....'"
Town of Nantucket
Conservation Commission
Town and County Building
Nantucket, Massachusetts 02554
Minutes of September 29, 1988 Page 10
12. Used petroleum products from the maintenance of construction
equipment and construction debris shall be collected and
disposed of off-site. No on-site disposal of these items is
allowed.
13. Dust control, if required, shall be limited to water. No salts
or other wetting agents shall be used.
li!. Any refuse material found on the site shall be disposed of at an
approved landfill and in no case will these materials be buried
or disposed of in or near the area designated as wetland.
15. This Order of Conditions shall apply to any successor in
interest or successor in control of the property.
The motion was carried.
b. William and Marilee Matteson - SEi!8-511 - 105 Baxter Road
(i!8-15). A motion was made to issue a standard Order to include
Special Conditions as follows:
ADDITIONAL SPECIAL CONDITIONS
WILLIAM AND MARILEE MATTESON
DEQE FILE NUMBER SEl.t8-511
The project is approved in accordance with the Notice of Intent,
the most recent plans cited on Form 5, the general and special
conditions on Form 5, and the following additional special
conditions:
3. 310 CMR 10.30(3) of the Wetlands Regulations, promulgated under
G.L. c. 131, s. 40, requires that no coastal engineering
structure, such as a bulkhead, revetment, or seawall, shall be
permitted on an eroding bank at any time in the future to
protect the project allowed by this Order of Conditions.
...,""
{
Town of Nantucket
Conservation Commission
Town and County Building
Nantucket, Massachusetts 02554
Minutes of September 29, 1988 Page 11
~. The line of snow fencing is to be erected before any other
activity at the site. Erected to mitigate for any possible
damage to the eroding coastal bank, it will also serve as a
limit of construction for work crews. The fencing shall remain
in good repair during all phases of construction, and it shall
not be removed until all soils are stabilized and seeded or
until permission to remove it is given by the Commission.
5. Natural vegetation between the coastal bank and the project site
will be left intact.
6. Any change made or intended to be made in the plans shall
require the applicant to file a new Notice of Intent or to
inquire of the Conservation Commission in writing whether the
change is substantial enough to require a new filing.
7. An as-built plan, signed and stamped by a registered
professional engineer or land surveyor in the Commonwealth of
Massachusetts, shall be submitted to the Commission at the same
time as a written request for a Certificate of Compliance and
shall specify how the completed plan differs from that shown on
the plans referred to in the Order of Conditions. The as-built
plan shall include, but not be limited to, the following: all
pipe/culvert inverts for inflow and outfalls, pipe slope, size
and composition; location of other drainage structures and their
composition; limits of fill or alteration; location of structure
and pavement within 100 feet of wetland; the edge of the
wetland; the grade contours within 100 feet of the wetland.
8. Members, employees, and agents of the Commission shall have the
right to enter and inspect the premises to evaluate compliance
with the conditions and performance standards stated in this
Order and the Nantucket Wetlands Protection Regulations and may
require the submittal of any data deemed necessary by the
Commission for that evaluation.
9. The applicant, owners, successors or assignees shall be
responsible for maintaining all on-site drainage structures and
/~
Town of Nantucket
Conservation Commission
Town and County Building
Nantucket, Massachusetts 02554
Minutes of September 29, 1988 Page 12
: !
i
outfalls, assuring the lasting integrity of vegetative cover on
the site and site activities so as to prevent erosion,
siltation, sedimentation, chemical contamination or other
detrimental impact to the on-site wetland and/or off-site
resource areas. It shall be the responsibility of the property
owner of record to see that maintenance conditions are complied
with as required by this Order.
10. This document shall be included in all construction contracts
and subcontracts dealing with the work proposed and shall
supersede other contract requirements.
11. Used petroleum products from the maintenance of construction
equipment and construction debris shall be collected and
disposed of off-site. No on-site disposal of these items is
allowed.
12. Dust control, if required, shall be limited to water. No salts
or other wetting agents shall be used.
13. Any refuse material found on the site shall be disposed of at an
approved landfill and in no case will these materials be buried
or disposed of in or near the area designated as wetland.
1~. This Order of Conditions shall apply to any successor in
interest or successor in control of the property.
The motion was carried.
3. Extension Permit
a. Jelleme - SE~8-338 - W. Chester St. (l.tl-~83) and change in
plans. John Shugrue was present as agent for the applicant and
requested an Extension Permit and approval of a minor
modification to the original plans. The results of a recent
field inspection were read.
A motion was made to issue a 2 - year Extension Permit and a
letter accepting the change in the plans as a minor
~~"TUCIr't'~
~,~ ~~,
~ \~..,
o 'IJI
~ '" j'l
. ~ ,"
'_~~J
~,,~~~,'Ii) E
Oll~...'..":;~.-:"
ORA1~....~
...."..-
Town of Nantucket
Conservation Commission
Town and County Building
Nantucket, Massachusetts 02554
Minutes of September 29, 1988 Page 13
modification: The second dwelling is to be built on the east
side of the lot instead of on the west side and tennis courts
are no longer part of the plan. Adding tennis courts or any
other structure within 100 ft. of the wetlands in the future
would require advance written permission from the Commission.
The motion was carried.
I,
~. Planning Board Referral
a. B & G Properties - betw. Sparks Ave. and Orange Street. A
motion was made to issue an advisory opinion that this
subdivision plan is not subject to the Wetlands Protection Act.
The motion was carried.
5. Other Business
a. Brushcutting estimate for Long Pond property. An estimate
had been submitted by Phil Bartlett. A motion was made to
accept the estimate, but to not allow the work to exceed l.t
hours. The motion was carried.
b. Austin Farms - SEl.t8-336 - (56-5l.t) - detention basin. Ben
McKelway explained the confusion and stated that due to an
oversight, the final approved plan for the project, revised Oct.
25, 1985, was not cited in the Order of Conditions. This plan
effectively did away with the detention basin called for in the
Notice of Intent. A motion was made to send a letter to Frank
L. Nee, Trustee of Austin Farms Realty Trust, to clarify the
situation. The motion was carried.
c. Consue Springs Gazebo - advertise for bids to demolish? The
Commissioners expressed mixed reactions toward a suggestion to
demolish the gazebo. While it was recognized as somewhat of an
Island landmark, it was also noted that the tiny gazebo is
subject to repeated vandalism and serves as an all too
convenient shelter from which to feed a burgeoning number of
feral ducks. The Commissioners needed more time to view its
condition and decided to report more on it at the next meeting.
.
. '-....-
Town of Nantucket
Conservation Commission
Town and County Building
Nantucket, Massachusetts 02554
Minutes of September 29, 1988 Page li!
d. Announcement: new applications now must include a copy of
the deed; receipt of recording Orders of Conditions must be
returned to ConCorn office; Nantucket Wetlands Bylaw amrnendment
effective date - September 21, 1988 including requirement that
abutters be notified by the applicant and submission of
certified mail receipts to the ConCorn at opening of the public
hearings.
e. Greenhill study - Sesachacha Pond - ConCorn vote for $
contribution. A motion was made to contribute $1500 towards the
current pond study. Henry Wasierski and Lee Dunn wanted to wait
until the full ConCom board was present to decide. Henry wanted
it on the record that he was in favor of a contribution. The
motion was carried.
f. Taylor pier - SEi!8-397 (29-10) - discussion. Ben McKelway
summarized some discrepancies in the project underway, the main
problem being the permanent section is too long by 15 ft. under
the local bylaw. The original Order called for a shorter pier,
however, after an appeal, a DEQE Superseding Order was issued
allowing it at its present length. Ben said several SHAB
members have expressed concern recently. He added Town Counsel
said the ConCorn could enforce the original Order as if it never
had been appealed if it wanted to. Lee Dunn thought the ConCorn
could fight this and probably win.
Ben agreed to speak with Mr. Taylor about the controversy and
encourage him to attend the next meeting.
g. Confirm addresses for Hernpleman complaint. Residential
addresses for Commissioners were confirmed.
h. Comments, questions from press and public. None.
I
Town of Nantucket
Conservation Commission
Town and County Building
Nantucket, Massachusetts 02554
Minutes of September 29, 1988 Page 15
6. Correspondence
The correspondence summary covering the period since the last
meeting was left to be read individually at home.
7. Minutes of September 15, 1988
A motion was made to accept the minutes of September 15t 1988 as
written.
There being no other business, the meeting adjourned at 10:i!3 PM.