Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1988-04-14 \ -" i Town of Nantucket Conservation Commission Town and County Building Nantucket, Massachusetts 02554 AGENDA FOR APRIL 1~, 1988 A. PUBLIC HEARINGS 1. J. & J. Cochran ET AL - SE~8-~~2 - 5~-56 No. Beach (cont ~/28) 2. J. Seward Johnson, Jr. - Almanac Pond Road 3. Sam & Rita Stark - SE~8-~70 - 39 Millbrook Road ~. Topland Properties - SE~8-~76 - ~O Low Beach Road (cont ~/28) 5. S/J Wauwinet Trust - Wauwinet Road (cont ~/28) 6. Arvids & R. Reinbergs - SE~8-~78 - 60 North Liberty Street 7. Tobey G. Shaw - SE~8-~79 - 117 Baxter Road 8. Michael J. O'Mara - 2~0 Polpis Road 9. Richard and Jane Steadman - 23 Quaise Road 10. Philip & C. Hempleman - ~9 Hulbert Ave. B. REGULAR MEETING 1. Request for Determination a. James A. Cooper - ~6 Hummock Pond Road b. I'1ichael R. Hehir - "Duck Inn", Mass. Ave., Madaket 2. Extension Permit a. Nant. Airport Commission - SE~8-3~9 - Nant. Shipyard So. 3. Orders of Conditions a. Monomoy Harbor Trust - SE~8-~65 - 60 Monomoy Road ~. Planning Board Referrals a. Norman & Lila Raben - Eel Point Road 5. Correspondence 6. Minutes of March 31, 1988 7. Other Business a. Susan Spring - SE48-250 - 339 Polpis Road - discussion b. Bruce Killen - SE~8-359 - 67 Cliff Road - revised plans c. John Nightingale - Wauwinet Road - discussion d. Martin Levine - Massachusetts Ave. - discussion e. Nant Wetlands Regulations - final available now - $5.00 f. Comments, questions from press and public 8. Field Inspections a. Beach Box Trust - SE~8-~00 - Lot 12, Hallowell Lane b. Stone Barn Inn/Daniel Nugent - 60 North Beach St. - RFD c. Tobey Leske/D. Sosebee - 5 Wamasquid Place - RFD d. K & L Schwenk - Miacomet Ave. & Miacomet Way - NOr e. M/M Antoinette Wade - Smith Point - RFD f. Lee/Jarrett - Sachem Rd. AA L. ~_/J ~/~ /J;/~rfY J4d _ / ~ ~~~ ~I. '~ Town of Nantucket Conservation Commission Town and County Building Nantucket, Massachusetts 02554 Minutes of April 14, 1988 Page 1 MINUTES OF APRIL 14, 1988 The public hearings of April 14, 1988 were called to order at 7:33 PM. Members present were: Peter W. Dunwiddie - Chairman, Lee Dunn, Bill Willet, Donald Visco, Carl Borchert and Henry Wasierski. Members absent were: Granville Cranston. A. PUBLIC HEARINGS 1. J. & J. Cochran ET AL - SE48-442 - 54 - 56 North Beach Street. The hearing had been continued from the last meeting until April 28, 1988. 2. J. Seward Johnson, Jr. - Almanac Pond Road. Jack Ranieri was present as agent for the applicant and addressed questions raised at the last meeting. Mr. Ranieri had looked into uric acid absorption. His consultant said there should be a maximum of 2 horses per acre on this 7-acre site. He added that the horses will be spending most of their time outside the Buffer Zone. Regarding the compost bin, he said it would be emptied once per week. Donald Visco did not think Mr. Ranieri would have any trouble finding places to dump it. Mr. Ranieri described a line of staked haybales to be placed along the property line and an estimated 50 cubic yards of fill to go to the west of the barn. The barn will be located 40 ft. from the property line. Mr. Ranieri also mentioned the possibility of constructing a carriage house in the future wherein no additional fill would be needed. Lynn Zimmerman of the Nantucket Land Council thought the project would be located too close to a neighbor's lot line to satisfy the Nantucket Zoning Setback Requirements. She had spoken with the Nantucket Building Inspector who confirmed that this application may have some problems. Mr. Ranieri said he had looked into this and saw no problem. Lynn suggested he go back and double-check because the zoning requirements tend to be more complex than most people assume. He agreed to do so. ,---. ., Town of Nantucket Conservation Commission Town and County Building Nantucket, Massachusetts 02554 Minutes of April 14, 1988 Page 2 Carl Borchert said the Commission will require a revised plan in the future for the carriage house even if it is located out of its jurisdiction, so as to make the file complete. There was discussion about how wet the area is now. Mr. Ranieri thought DEQE had all the necessary information and agreed to call them about any other reasons for the delay in issuing a DEQE file number. A motion was made to continue the hearing for a DEQE file number. The motion was carried. 3. Sam & Rita Stark - SE48-470 - 39 Millbrook Road. John Shugrue was present as agent for the applicant and reported the applicant will need to move the septic system because his well is within 100 ft. of the leaching field. The limits of work are to be a max. 10 ft. from the house. A motion was made to close the hearing. The motion was carried. 4. ToplandProperties - SE48-476 - 40 Low Beach Road. The hearing had been continued from the last meeting until April 28, 1988. 5. S/J Wauwinet Trust - Wauwinet Road. The hearing had been continued from the last meeting until April 28, 1988. 6. Arvids and R. Reinbergs - SE48-478 - 60 North Liberty Street. Mr. Reinbergs was present with Glen Wills from Nantucket Surveyors as his agent. Peter Dunwiddie read the results of two recent field inspections. Mr. Wills described the wetlands on the site. The Commission did not dispute the wetland boundaries. He added the houses will have Town water and sewer and no filling is proposed. Lee Dunn asked if the applicant was requesting a waiver of the regulations due to unusual circumstances. Mr. Wills admitted that he was, due to the narrowness of the lot. Peter Dunwiddie thought he could consider building one small house as an alternative. Mr. Wills said the project would not disturb Town of Nantucket Conservation Commission Town and County Building Nantucket, Massachusetts 02554 Minutes of April 14, 1988 Page 3 any wildlife habitat, and that the work would be in the Buffer Zone only and not in the wetland. He added the lot is oversized for zoning requirements. Donald Visco said this is in a developed residential area. Carl Borchert was surprised by the size of the house to the rear. Peter read from the wetlands regulations the section about waivers and said it appeared there were some alternatives that should be looked into. Henry Wasierski suggested the applicant come back with alternative plans showing a smaller house with a small accessory building, for example. Lee Dunn thought the applicant had an obligation to explore alternatives in these situations and show why they wouldn't work or were unreasonable. Lee suggested sketching other house designs to increase the setback. They could even use the same footprint. The applicant agreed to work on alternative designs. A motion was made to continue the hearing for more information from the applicant. The motion was carried. 7. Tobey G. Shaw - SE48-~79 - 117 Baxter Road. Jamie Jones was present as agent for the applicant. Arthur Reade, Jr. of Reade and Alger P. C. was present as attorney for the applicant. Glen Wills of Nantucket Surveyors was also present as agent. Ben McKelway said the applicant had requested the Commission to write a letter stating the house is subject to possible collapse as a result of wave-caused erosion to Sankaty Bluff, as referenced in a recent paper written by Dr. Wesley N. Tiffney, Jr., Director of the University of Massachusetts Field Station on Nantucket. He requested the Commission's support in writing for moving the house as far back from the bluff as possible and as soon as possible. Mr. Jones showed photos taken Feb. 28, 1988 depicting the erosion problem on the lot and said there was now 30 ft. to the bluff edge taking into account the undercuts. He explained that the applicant's insurance company needed the above-requested letter to comply with Federal Flood Insurance requirements. Mr. Jones also stressed the need to stick to his firm moving .,- Town of Nantucket Conservation Commission Town and County Building Nantucket. Massachusetts 02554 Minutes of April 14, 1988 Page 4 schedule for the safety of the bluff, house and the public. He admitted a somewhat awkward predicament in that the house was scheduled to be moved before the Federal Flood Insurance would be issued. Mr. Reade speaking for Mr. Shaw said the public danger is clear cut and cited Dr. Tiffney's report. The applicant had made a formal request to the Nantucket Board of Selectmen for the above-mentioned letter, however it would not be addressed until their April 27, 1988 meeting due to a vacation schedule. Mr. Reade had asked Nantucket Building Commissioner Ronald Santos for a determination that the house be condemned as a threat to public health and safety, and Mr. Santos was in the process of contacting Nantucket Town Counsel for advice on the matter. There was extensive discussion about whether the Commission has the authority to condemn buildings. Peter Dunwiddie and Donald Visco thought the appropriate thing to do was to request speedy action to correct the problem on the site while stating the facts. Donald said Mr. Shaw surely must be eligible for Flood Insurance. Henry Wasierski, however, highlighted the fact that the owner had had 2 years to observe the erosion conditions on his lot and should have done something before now. He thought the "buyer should have been aware" of a potentially bad investment. Henry couldn't go along with the Commission going out of its way to support Mr. Shaw. Donald didn't see any imminent danger of the house collapsing and said the determination of its condition was up to the Building Commissioner. The argument went around again over whether the Commission needed to send a special letter. Mr. Jones said that because Sankaty Lighthouse is such a tourist attraction, he feared the public was in danger due to the conditions at the bluff edge. Donald Visco thought it was the responsibility of the property owners and the County Commissioners to fence and post these properties. Mr. Reade added that even the workers during the move would be in danger at the bluff edge. The applicant has obtained a temporary Building Permit. ~, \ Town of Nantucket Conservation Commission Town and County Building Nantucket. Massachusetts 02554 Minutes of April 14, 1988 Page 5 Carl Borchert supported the letter and thought it was for a good cause. He said it would set a cautionary precedent. Peter Dunwiddie agreed both with Carl and Donald in that on the one hand the owner's level of awareness of the conditions should not be at issue now and on the other there is no imminent danger. Mr. Jones said Dr. Tiffney's report said the erosion had accelerated recently due to shifting positions of offshore sandbars and increase in sea level. Donald Visco supported Ben's draft of the letter with changes. A motion was made to send it. Glen Wills mentioned a change in the plan to reflect a revised building location. The applicant was presently before the Zoning Board of Appeals requesting emergency action. Mr. Wills admitted they were buying time by moving the house only 40 ft. back. A motion was made to close the hearing. The motion was carried. 8. Michael J. O'Mara - 240 Polpis Road. Robert Daylor of Daylor Consulting Group was present as agent with the applicant. He described the project and resource areas, adding that of the 6 homes around Polpis Harbor, 3 of them have some type of boat access or catwalks. He went over the plans for a seasonal catwalk to be 4 ft. wide and constructed of non-creosoted materials. He felt it was designed to adequately allow sufficient sunlight and water flow beneath it. The total distance would be 190 ft. long. He felt it would have low visual impact. The method of jetting in the support posts was discussed extensively. Henry Wasierski was concerned about siltation in this area valuable for its shellfish and fish populations. He and Carl Borchert suggested doing the work outside the spatting season, June and July. Henry added that in some years, some of the best scallops may be found about 200 yds. away from this Town of Nantucket Conservation Commission Town and County Building Nantucket, Massachusetts 02554 Minutes of April 14, 1988 Page 6 site, in front of Leeds Mitchell's boathouse. Mr. Daylor was awaiting comment from the Nantucket Shellfish Warden on the project. He also stressed that all the work would be done by hand at low tide. Henry suggested shortening the catwalk. Mr. Daylor said it is too shallow at low tide to do that leaving the float sitting on the mud during most tides. Henry thought it was a long way to go just to get to a dinghy. A motion was made to continue the hearing for: 1) written comments from SHAB 2) information on the best time of year to do the work so as to not damage the shellfish and fish populations 3) a simple wildlife inventory of the creeks and the marsh using a sample method 4) a DEQE file number The motion was carried. 9. Richard and of Vaughan, applicant. agent. Jane Steadman - 23 Quaise Road. Melissa Philbrick Dale and Philbrick was present as attorney for the Robert Emack of Nantucket Surveyors was present as Ms. Philbrick recounted the circumstances surrounding the unauthorized placement of riprap to solve an erosion problem. She said the Nantucket Electric Co. had notified the applicant about some exposed electrical wires on the bluff and he had instructed a contractor to take care of the problem. Some members said the Commission probably would have never approved the riprap had a Notice of Intent been filed. Bob Emack thought the Commission should recommend a preferable method of dealing with the problem. The dynamics and advantages of the various types of revetments were discussed. Ben McKelway said the applicant could be fined for this violation. Henry Wasierski and Donald Visco favored asking him to restore the area to its original condition. Lee Dunn thought repeated beach access by vehicles could hav~ contributed to the erosion. Ms. Philbrick defended Mr. Steadman by saying he was addressing a utilities problem at the time, not an erosion problem. <) Town of Nantucket Conservation Commission Town and County Building Nantucket, Massachusetts 02554 Minutes of April 14, 1988 Page 7 Mr. Emack suggested approval with monitoring by the Commission every 3 years. Carl Borchert thought this was reasonable. Peter Dunwiddie asked why relocating the power line wasn't considered at the time and Mr. Emack could not comment. The possibility of pushing things up to the DEQE level was discussed. The riprap is actually protecting an abutter's house belonging to Chuckrow, if it protects any house at all. Mr. Emack suggested additional damage to the bluff could occur during restoration. Ben McKelway was asked to contact DEQE and obtain recommendation on how to handle this application. made to continue the hearing for more information file number. The motion was carried. an unofficial A motion was and a DEQE 10. Philip & C. Hempleman - 49 Hulbert Ave. John Shugrue was present as agent for the applicant and presented an amended plan to reflect a 4 ft. increase in deck dimensions from 8 ft. to 12 ft. There was discussion about the previous request for a Certificate of Compliance whi~h had been denied because the dune had not been restored. This application is for a larger deck than that originally applied for and a bulkhead. Lee Dunn didn't think the Commission could act on this Notice of Intent until a Certificate was issued on the last application. He thought the applicant was only asking for more of what the Commission had denied in the request for compliance. A motion was made to continue the hearing for further discussion and a DEQE file number. The motion was carried. B. REGULAR MEETING 1. Requests for Determination a. James A. Cooper - 46 Hummock Pond Road. A motion was made to issue a negative Determination stating the area described in the Request is not an Area Subject to Protection Under the Act. The motion was carried. .-,~;,. ,-... \ Town of Nantucket Conservation Commission Town and County Building Nantucket, Massachusetts 02554 Minutes of April 14, 1988 Page 8 b. Michael R. Hehir - "Duck Inn", Mass. Ave., Madaket. Ben McKelway had advised the applicant that he did not need to attend the meeting. A motion was made to issue a positive Determination stating that the area described in the Request is an Area Subject to Protection Under the Act. Therefore, any removing, filling, dredging or altering of that area requires the filing of a Notice of Intent. The motion was carried. 2. Extension Permit a. Nantucket Airport Commission - SE48-349 - Nantucket Shipyard South. Peter Dunwiddie read an annotated letter from the Coast Guard, sent by Joseph Forns of Applied Marine Ecology Lab. The Commission did not feel this qualified as a true Letter of Adequacy, as required in the Order of Conditions, Special Condition #4. Lynn Zimmerman of the Nantucket Land Council had spoken with Chief Petty Officer Vaneska who said there were no plans to issue a Letter of Adequacy on the project and he would bring it up at a meeting in 2 weeks. LYnn had noticed a personnell shack on the plans and Mr. Vaneska .said it was not present on the original plans. Use of a LARC amphibious vehicle on the site was discussed. Ben McKelway was asked to send a letter to Mr. Forns saying the Commission would not issue an Extension Permit until a real Letter of Adequacy is received and that construction may not begin until it is received. Mr. Forns would be asked to attend the April 28, 1988 meeting to discuss the matter. A copy of the letter will go to the Nantucket Airport Commission. 3. Orders of Conditions a. Monomoy Harbor Realty Trust - SE48-465 - 60 Monomoy Road. A draft Order of Conditions was read by Ben McKelway. He had consulted Beth Goodman in Town Council's office about a certain sentence in #8 of the draft -- ongoing maintenance ,-." , Town of Nantucket Conservation Commission Town and County Building Nantucket, Massachusetts 02554 Minutes of April 14, 1988 Page 9 responsibilities -- and she said the sentence was OK but probably not needed. The Commission decided not to use that sentence in the Order. A motion was made to issue the draft Order of Conditions as written to include the latest replication plans submitted at this meeting. The motion was carried. b. Sam and Rita Stark - SE48-470 - 39 Millbrook Road. A motion was made to issue a standard Order of Conditions to include the following Special Conditions: 1. The cottage must be at least 55 feet from the edge of the wetland vegetation as shown on the plan. 2. There shall be no brushcutting more than 10 feet from the cottage on the pond side of the cottage. 3. Prior to any activity at the site, a row of staked haybales shall be installed 10 feet from the foundation, as shown on the plan. Erected to mitigate for any siltation which might wash into the wetland during construction, the haybale line will also serve as a limit of construction for work crews. The haybale line shall remain in good repair during all phases of construction and it shall not be removed until all soils are stabilized and seeded or until permission to remove it is given by the Commission. 4. Natural vegetation between the wetland edge and the new construction will be left intact. Once the building is constructed, any disturbed area within this buffer area will be replanted with native plants. The motion was carried. c. Tobey G. Shaw - SE48-479 - 117 Baxter Road. A motion was made to issue a standard Order of Conditions referencing the most recent plans and containing the following Special Conditions: -- \ I Town of Nantucket Conservation Commission Town and County Building Nantucket, Massachusetts 02554 Minutes of April 14, 1988 Page 10 1. Section 30(3) of the Wetlands Regulations, promulgated under G.L. c. 131, s. 40, requires that no coastal engineering structure, such as a bulkhead, revetment, or seawall, shall be permitted on an eroding bank at any time in the future to protect the project allowed by this Order of Conditions. 2. The house shall be moved as far back from the edge of the bluff as possible. 3. Construction activity shall stay as far back from the edge of the bluff as possible. The motion was carried. 4. Planning Board Referral a. Norman and Lila Raben - Eel Point Road. A motion was made to send a standard letter advising the Nantucket Planning Board that the existing structures at Raben, Eel Point Road are not subject to the Wetlands Protection Act. However, since everything within 100 ft. of the dune comes under Conservation Commission jurisdiction, if the property owners are planning any activity within that Buffer Zone, they should first file a Notice of Intent. The existing structures are about 105 ft. from the dune. The motion was carried. 5. Correspondence All correspondence was read and accepted. 6. Minutes of March 31, 1988. A motion was made to accept the Minutes as written with the following change: * p.-7: paragraph *1 - add after "affected." the following sentence: "He also stated the Commission had not acted with leniency in the past. When asked to cite some examples, Mr. Tillotson could not think of any." The motion was carried. \ \ \ \ \ ,~ \ Town of Nantucket Conservation Commission Town and County Building Nantucket, Massachusetts 02554 Minutes of April 14, 1988 Page 11 7. Other Business a. Susan Spring - SE48-250 - 339 Polpis Road. A letter had been sent instructing Ms. Spring to appear at tonight's meeting to discuss brushcutting on her lot down to the edge of a pond. She was not present, but a letter from her was read stating she did not realize the activity was a violation. The pros and cons of brushcutting on Nantucket were discussed. Donald Visco expressed some of his views on brushcutting in general saying he thought the Island was becoming overgrown and that habitat for deer, rabbits and small rodents which can carry deer ticks seems to be increasing. Since there are very few grazing animals anymore which tend to maintain open grassland habitat, Donald felt the Commission should support methods of management used to keep land open. Peter Dunwiddie agreed with Donald and talked about his years of ongoing research with the Massachusetts Audubon Society using controlled burning as a management option on Nantucket. However, Peter strongly felt that when brushcutting is to occur within the Buffer Zone, Notices of Intent must be filed. Lee Dunn also agreed. Henry Wasierski suggested that contractors hired to do the brushcutting are also responsible for knowing the regulations and thought getting the brochure out as soon as possible to various Island sources was imperative to increasing the public's awareness on these matters. Carl Borchert gave a brief history of this lot and said brushcutting had occurred 4 years ago. He noted that it had certainly grown back. Peter Dunwiddie added, however, that ignorance of the regulations is no excuse for violating them. Henry also went on to suggest sponsoring a public workshop to help contractors, professionals and laypeople understand the new wetlands regulations and thought it would have a lot of interest. Ben McKelway was instructed to send Ms. Spring a letter stating that the Commission decided not to pursue this matter further at this time, however reminding her that no activity will be allowed within 100 ft. of any wetland vegetation without the prior filing with and approval from the Commission. .-...... ~ Town of Nantucket Conservation Commission Town and County Building Nantucket, Massachusetts 02554 Minutes of April 14. 1988 Page 12 Glen Wills of Nantucket Surveyors reported that Ms. Spring had asked him to keep his ears open at the meeting. She had thought that since the lot had been brushcut before, it was OK to do it again. She had expressed a willingness to comply with whatever the Commission would require and thought it would revegetate itself. b. Bruce Killen - SE48-359 - 67 Cliff Road. Donald Visco abstained from the discussion. Glen Wills of Nantucket Surveyors was present as agent for Mr. Killen and presented revised plans. He said Dave Champoux had advised Mr. Killen to wait until spring to revegetate that portion of wetlands on the lot that had been accidentally cleared. There was discussion comparing the old plans with the revised ones. Carl Borchert thought Mr. Killen had made a good faith effort to respond to the Enforcement Order. The December 1987 plans would be considered the final plans. Mr. Wills said there is no provision he knew of for releasing an Enforcement Order from a deed. Carl thought when a Certificate of Compliance is issued, a Special Condition which supersedes the Enforcement Order may be written into it. Ben McKelway was instructed to send Mr. Killen a letter giving him permission to proceed with the new planting schedule received April 11, 1988 and stating that the cease and desist provision of the Enforcement Order is lifted. c. John Nightengale - Wauwinet Road - discussion. Carl Borchert reported on a violation whereby a number (45 total) of mature tupelo, sassafras and red maple trees had been cut in a wooded swamp on the lot. He read a field inspection report from a Determination of Applicability dated Feb. 20, 1984 which said a Notice of Intent was required for any work done at this site. Ben McKelway had spoken with Mr. Nightengale who could not be present and he said he had not been aware of any wetlands regulations to which he was subject when he cut the trees. In fact he said when he purchased the lot, a real estate agent had even suggested he might wish to do so in order to improve his views of Polpis Harbor. Ben had drafted a list of enforcement options to deal with the violation. UO!SS!WWOJ UOHQAJ8SUOJ le~anlugN JO UMol KSZO sllasnq:>lfSS'8W '~:m~N BUlPnna: A1DDOO po UIAO.L ~t aSEd 886! '~! T1~d~ JO sa+nu1W 'pa1~~Eo se~ U01+0W aqx 'epUaSE 886! 'Z! ^EW aq+ UO ~EaddE 0+ aW1+ U1 apew aq +snw SU~T~~ aq~ 'o+a '~a+aWE1P ~~+ 'sa1oads ~q pa~o~+sap sae~+ TTe JO ~~o+ua^u1 a+aTdwoo E SU1pnTou1 PUE U01SS1WWOO aq+ 0+ aTqe+daooe +uE+Tnsuoo e ~q auop +uawssasse a~EWEp paT1e+ap E apnTou1 +snw a01+oN aqx 'SS6! '6Z T1~d~ ~q peT1J u01+e~0+sa~ TTnJ e ~OJ +ua+uI JO a01+oN E JO ~u1T1J eq+ ~u1pnTou1 SU01S1^0~d q+1~ ~ap~o +uaweo~oJu~ ue anss1 0+ apEW se~ U01+0W E 'u01+e~ap1SUoo awos ~e+J~ 'OSE sq+UOW ~aJ E u01+ua++e SIU01SS~WWOO eq+ 0+ s1q+ SU1~q 0+ pa1~+ peq aq P1es 1~s~a1sEM ~uaH 'U01+eo1TddE TEU1S1~0 aq+ JO +~Ed uaaq +ou peq q01q~ ~ooTJ puooas e pEq ~OU SU1TTa~p aq+ +Eq+ pa+ou PUE ^q~eau +oa~o~d ~aq+oue SU1~a1^ aT1q~ ssa~So~d u1 +oa~o~d aq+ pao1+ou wea+ u01+oadsu1 PTa~J aq+ +eq+ pa+ou +~eqo~og T~EO 'u01ssnos1P - +e~epew "eA~ s++asnqoessew - aU1Aa~ U1+~EW 'p '~a++Ew aq+ ssnos1P 0+ SUETd SU1~~0~ aq+ q+~~ ~u1+aaw BS6! 'BZ T1~d~ aq+ +e ~Eadde 0+ W1q SU1~SE aU1Aa~ .~ a+1~ 0+ pa~SE SE~ ^E~Ta~ow uag '+uewaounouuE TE~eua5 'OO'S$ _ ~ou eTqET1EAE TEU1J - Su01+ETn~eE spUET+aM +a~on+UEN 'a 'Su01s1Aa~ a~n+nJ ~OJ u01+epuewwooe~ E a~w PUE +1 0+u1 ~ooT 0+ pea~Se ^E~Te~ow uag 'seqoeeq TE+SEOO uo ~u1qs1ueTda~ ~oJ u01s1AO~d ou pa~oqs suo~+ETn~e~ spUET+a~ ~eu aq+ +eq+ peu01+uaw s~o~eA~ns +e~on+ueN JO sTT1M ueT5 'o1Tqnd PUE ssa~d wO~J su01+sanb 's+uewwoo 'J 'Wd SS:O! +E peu~no~pE ~u1+aaw eq+ 'ssau1snq ~aq+o ou ~u1eq a~aq~