HomeMy WebLinkAbout1988-04-14
\
-"
i
Town of Nantucket
Conservation Commission
Town and County Building
Nantucket, Massachusetts 02554
AGENDA FOR APRIL 1~, 1988
A. PUBLIC HEARINGS
1. J. & J. Cochran ET AL - SE~8-~~2 - 5~-56 No. Beach (cont ~/28)
2. J. Seward Johnson, Jr. - Almanac Pond Road
3. Sam & Rita Stark - SE~8-~70 - 39 Millbrook Road
~. Topland Properties - SE~8-~76 - ~O Low Beach Road (cont ~/28)
5. S/J Wauwinet Trust - Wauwinet Road (cont ~/28)
6. Arvids & R. Reinbergs - SE~8-~78 - 60 North Liberty Street
7. Tobey G. Shaw - SE~8-~79 - 117 Baxter Road
8. Michael J. O'Mara - 2~0 Polpis Road
9. Richard and Jane Steadman - 23 Quaise Road
10. Philip & C. Hempleman - ~9 Hulbert Ave.
B. REGULAR MEETING
1. Request for Determination
a. James A. Cooper - ~6 Hummock Pond Road
b. I'1ichael R. Hehir - "Duck Inn", Mass. Ave., Madaket
2. Extension Permit
a. Nant. Airport Commission - SE~8-3~9 - Nant. Shipyard So.
3. Orders of Conditions
a. Monomoy Harbor Trust - SE~8-~65 - 60 Monomoy Road
~. Planning Board Referrals
a. Norman & Lila Raben - Eel Point Road
5. Correspondence
6. Minutes of March 31, 1988
7. Other Business
a. Susan Spring - SE48-250 - 339 Polpis Road - discussion
b. Bruce Killen - SE~8-359 - 67 Cliff Road - revised plans
c. John Nightingale - Wauwinet Road - discussion
d. Martin Levine - Massachusetts Ave. - discussion
e. Nant Wetlands Regulations - final available now - $5.00
f. Comments, questions from press and public
8. Field Inspections
a. Beach Box Trust - SE~8-~00 - Lot 12, Hallowell Lane
b. Stone Barn Inn/Daniel Nugent - 60 North Beach St. - RFD
c. Tobey Leske/D. Sosebee - 5 Wamasquid Place - RFD
d. K & L Schwenk - Miacomet Ave. & Miacomet Way - NOr
e. M/M Antoinette Wade - Smith Point - RFD
f. Lee/Jarrett - Sachem Rd.
AA L. ~_/J ~/~ /J;/~rfY J4d _ /
~ ~~~
~I.
'~
Town of Nantucket
Conservation Commission
Town and County Building
Nantucket, Massachusetts 02554
Minutes of April 14, 1988 Page 1
MINUTES OF APRIL 14, 1988
The public hearings of April 14, 1988 were called to order at 7:33 PM.
Members present were: Peter W. Dunwiddie - Chairman, Lee Dunn, Bill
Willet, Donald Visco, Carl Borchert and Henry Wasierski. Members absent
were: Granville Cranston.
A. PUBLIC HEARINGS
1. J. & J. Cochran ET AL - SE48-442 - 54 - 56 North Beach Street.
The hearing had been continued from the last meeting until April
28, 1988.
2. J. Seward Johnson, Jr. - Almanac Pond Road. Jack Ranieri was
present as agent for the applicant and addressed questions
raised at the last meeting.
Mr. Ranieri had looked into uric acid absorption. His
consultant said there should be a maximum of 2 horses per acre
on this 7-acre site. He added that the horses will be spending
most of their time outside the Buffer Zone. Regarding the
compost bin, he said it would be emptied once per week. Donald
Visco did not think Mr. Ranieri would have any trouble finding
places to dump it. Mr. Ranieri described a line of staked
haybales to be placed along the property line and an estimated
50 cubic yards of fill to go to the west of the barn. The barn
will be located 40 ft. from the property line. Mr. Ranieri also
mentioned the possibility of constructing a carriage house in
the future wherein no additional fill would be needed.
Lynn Zimmerman of the Nantucket Land Council thought the project
would be located too close to a neighbor's lot line to satisfy
the Nantucket Zoning Setback Requirements. She had spoken with
the Nantucket Building Inspector who confirmed that this
application may have some problems. Mr. Ranieri said he had
looked into this and saw no problem. Lynn suggested he go back
and double-check because the zoning requirements tend to be
more complex than most people assume. He agreed to do so.
,---.
.,
Town of Nantucket
Conservation Commission
Town and County Building
Nantucket, Massachusetts 02554
Minutes of April 14, 1988 Page 2
Carl Borchert said the Commission will require a revised plan in
the future for the carriage house even if it is located out of
its jurisdiction, so as to make the file complete.
There was discussion about how wet the area is now. Mr. Ranieri
thought DEQE had all the necessary information and agreed to
call them about any other reasons for the delay in issuing a
DEQE file number. A motion was made to continue the hearing for
a DEQE file number. The motion was carried.
3. Sam & Rita Stark - SE48-470 - 39 Millbrook Road. John Shugrue
was present as agent for the applicant and reported the
applicant will need to move the septic system because his well
is within 100 ft. of the leaching field. The limits of work are
to be a max. 10 ft. from the house.
A motion was made to close the hearing. The motion was
carried.
4. ToplandProperties - SE48-476 - 40 Low Beach Road. The hearing
had been continued from the last meeting until April 28, 1988.
5. S/J Wauwinet Trust - Wauwinet Road. The hearing had been
continued from the last meeting until April 28, 1988.
6. Arvids and R. Reinbergs - SE48-478 - 60 North Liberty Street.
Mr. Reinbergs was present with Glen Wills from Nantucket
Surveyors as his agent. Peter Dunwiddie read the results of two
recent field inspections. Mr. Wills described the wetlands
on the site. The Commission did not dispute the wetland
boundaries. He added the houses will have Town water and sewer
and no filling is proposed.
Lee Dunn asked if the applicant was requesting a waiver of
the regulations due to unusual circumstances. Mr. Wills
admitted that he was, due to the narrowness of the lot. Peter
Dunwiddie thought he could consider building one small house as
an alternative. Mr. Wills said the project would not disturb
Town of Nantucket
Conservation Commission
Town and County Building
Nantucket, Massachusetts 02554
Minutes of April 14, 1988 Page 3
any wildlife habitat, and that the work would be in the Buffer
Zone only and not in the wetland. He added the lot is oversized
for zoning requirements.
Donald Visco said this is in a developed residential area. Carl
Borchert was surprised by the size of the house to the rear.
Peter read from the wetlands regulations the section about
waivers and said it appeared there were some alternatives that
should be looked into. Henry Wasierski suggested the applicant
come back with alternative plans showing a smaller house with a
small accessory building, for example. Lee Dunn thought the
applicant had an obligation to explore alternatives in these
situations and show why they wouldn't work or were unreasonable.
Lee suggested sketching other house designs to increase the
setback. They could even use the same footprint.
The applicant agreed to work on alternative designs. A motion
was made to continue the hearing for more information from the
applicant. The motion was carried.
7. Tobey G. Shaw - SE48-~79 - 117 Baxter Road. Jamie Jones was
present as agent for the applicant. Arthur Reade, Jr. of Reade
and Alger P. C. was present as attorney for the applicant. Glen
Wills of Nantucket Surveyors was also present as agent. Ben
McKelway said the applicant had requested the Commission to
write a letter stating the house is subject to possible collapse
as a result of wave-caused erosion to Sankaty Bluff, as
referenced in a recent paper written by Dr. Wesley N. Tiffney,
Jr., Director of the University of Massachusetts Field Station
on Nantucket. He requested the Commission's support in writing
for moving the house as far back from the bluff as possible and
as soon as possible.
Mr. Jones showed photos taken Feb. 28, 1988 depicting the
erosion problem on the lot and said there was now 30 ft. to the
bluff edge taking into account the undercuts. He explained that
the applicant's insurance company needed the above-requested
letter to comply with Federal Flood Insurance requirements. Mr.
Jones also stressed the need to stick to his firm moving
.,-
Town of Nantucket
Conservation Commission
Town and County Building
Nantucket. Massachusetts 02554
Minutes of April 14, 1988 Page 4
schedule for the safety of the bluff, house and the public. He
admitted a somewhat awkward predicament in that the house was
scheduled to be moved before the Federal Flood Insurance would
be issued.
Mr. Reade speaking for Mr. Shaw said the public danger is clear
cut and cited Dr. Tiffney's report. The applicant had made a
formal request to the Nantucket Board of Selectmen for the
above-mentioned letter, however it would not be addressed until
their April 27, 1988 meeting due to a vacation schedule. Mr.
Reade had asked Nantucket Building Commissioner Ronald Santos
for a determination that the house be condemned as a threat to
public health and safety, and Mr. Santos was in the process of
contacting Nantucket Town Counsel for advice on the matter.
There was extensive discussion about whether the Commission has
the authority to condemn buildings. Peter Dunwiddie and Donald
Visco thought the appropriate thing to do was to request speedy
action to correct the problem on the site while stating the
facts. Donald said Mr. Shaw surely must be eligible for Flood
Insurance. Henry Wasierski, however, highlighted the fact that
the owner had had 2 years to observe the erosion conditions on
his lot and should have done something before now. He thought
the "buyer should have been aware" of a potentially bad
investment. Henry couldn't go along with the Commission going
out of its way to support Mr. Shaw. Donald didn't see any
imminent danger of the house collapsing and said the
determination of its condition was up to the Building
Commissioner.
The argument went around again over whether the Commission
needed to send a special letter. Mr. Jones said that because
Sankaty Lighthouse is such a tourist attraction, he feared the
public was in danger due to the conditions at the bluff edge.
Donald Visco thought it was the responsibility of the property
owners and the County Commissioners to fence and post these
properties. Mr. Reade added that even the workers during the
move would be in danger at the bluff edge. The applicant has
obtained a temporary Building Permit.
~,
\
Town of Nantucket
Conservation Commission
Town and County Building
Nantucket. Massachusetts 02554
Minutes of April 14, 1988 Page 5
Carl Borchert supported the letter and thought it was for a good
cause. He said it would set a cautionary precedent. Peter
Dunwiddie agreed both with Carl and Donald in that on the one
hand the owner's level of awareness of the conditions should not
be at issue now and on the other there is no imminent danger.
Mr. Jones said Dr. Tiffney's report said the erosion had
accelerated recently due to shifting positions of offshore
sandbars and increase in sea level.
Donald Visco supported Ben's draft of the letter with changes.
A motion was made to send it.
Glen Wills mentioned a change in the plan to reflect a revised
building location. The applicant was presently before the
Zoning Board of Appeals requesting emergency action. Mr. Wills
admitted they were buying time by moving the house only 40 ft.
back.
A motion was made to close the hearing. The motion was
carried.
8. Michael J. O'Mara - 240 Polpis Road. Robert Daylor of Daylor
Consulting Group was present as agent with the applicant. He
described the project and resource areas, adding that of the 6
homes around Polpis Harbor, 3 of them have some type of boat
access or catwalks. He went over the plans for a seasonal
catwalk to be 4 ft. wide and constructed of non-creosoted
materials. He felt it was designed to adequately allow
sufficient sunlight and water flow beneath it. The total
distance would be 190 ft. long. He felt it would have low
visual impact.
The method of jetting in the support posts was discussed
extensively. Henry Wasierski was concerned about siltation in
this area valuable for its shellfish and fish populations. He
and Carl Borchert suggested doing the work outside the spatting
season, June and July. Henry added that in some years, some of
the best scallops may be found about 200 yds. away from this
Town of Nantucket
Conservation Commission
Town and County Building
Nantucket, Massachusetts 02554
Minutes of April 14, 1988 Page 6
site, in front of Leeds Mitchell's boathouse. Mr. Daylor was
awaiting comment from the Nantucket Shellfish Warden on the
project. He also stressed that all the work would be done by
hand at low tide. Henry suggested shortening the catwalk. Mr.
Daylor said it is too shallow at low tide to do that leaving the
float sitting on the mud during most tides. Henry thought it
was a long way to go just to get to a dinghy.
A motion was made to continue the hearing for:
1) written comments from SHAB
2) information on the best time of year to do the work so
as to not damage the shellfish and fish populations
3) a simple wildlife inventory of the creeks and the marsh
using a sample method
4) a DEQE file number
The motion was carried.
9.
Richard and
of Vaughan,
applicant.
agent.
Jane Steadman - 23 Quaise Road. Melissa Philbrick
Dale and Philbrick was present as attorney for the
Robert Emack of Nantucket Surveyors was present as
Ms. Philbrick recounted the circumstances surrounding the
unauthorized placement of riprap to solve an erosion problem.
She said the Nantucket Electric Co. had notified the applicant
about some exposed electrical wires on the bluff and he had
instructed a contractor to take care of the problem.
Some members said the Commission probably would have never
approved the riprap had a Notice of Intent been filed. Bob
Emack thought the Commission should recommend a preferable
method of dealing with the problem. The dynamics and advantages
of the various types of revetments were discussed. Ben McKelway
said the applicant could be fined for this violation. Henry
Wasierski and Donald Visco favored asking him to restore the
area to its original condition. Lee Dunn thought repeated beach
access by vehicles could hav~ contributed to the erosion. Ms.
Philbrick defended Mr. Steadman by saying he was addressing a
utilities problem at the time, not an erosion problem.
<)
Town of Nantucket
Conservation Commission
Town and County Building
Nantucket, Massachusetts 02554
Minutes of April 14, 1988 Page 7
Mr. Emack suggested approval with monitoring by the Commission
every 3 years. Carl Borchert thought this was reasonable.
Peter Dunwiddie asked why relocating the power line wasn't
considered at the time and Mr. Emack could not comment. The
possibility of pushing things up to the DEQE level was
discussed. The riprap is actually protecting an abutter's house
belonging to Chuckrow, if it protects any house at all. Mr.
Emack suggested additional damage to the bluff could occur
during restoration.
Ben McKelway was asked to contact DEQE and obtain
recommendation on how to handle this application.
made to continue the hearing for more information
file number. The motion was carried.
an unofficial
A motion was
and a DEQE
10. Philip & C. Hempleman - 49 Hulbert Ave. John Shugrue was
present as agent for the applicant and presented an amended plan
to reflect a 4 ft. increase in deck dimensions from 8 ft. to 12
ft.
There was discussion about the previous request for a
Certificate of Compliance whi~h had been denied because the dune
had not been restored. This application is for a larger deck
than that originally applied for and a bulkhead. Lee Dunn
didn't think the Commission could act on this Notice of Intent
until a Certificate was issued on the last application. He
thought the applicant was only asking for more of what the
Commission had denied in the request for compliance.
A motion was made to continue the hearing for further discussion
and a DEQE file number. The motion was carried.
B. REGULAR MEETING
1. Requests for Determination
a. James A. Cooper - 46 Hummock Pond Road. A motion was made
to issue a negative Determination stating the area described in
the Request is not an Area Subject to Protection Under the Act.
The motion was carried.
.-,~;,.
,-...
\
Town of Nantucket
Conservation Commission
Town and County Building
Nantucket, Massachusetts 02554
Minutes of April 14, 1988 Page 8
b. Michael R. Hehir - "Duck Inn", Mass. Ave., Madaket. Ben
McKelway had advised the applicant that he did not need to
attend the meeting. A motion was made to issue a positive
Determination stating that the area described in the Request is
an Area Subject to Protection Under the Act. Therefore, any
removing, filling, dredging or altering of that area requires
the filing of a Notice of Intent. The motion was carried.
2. Extension Permit
a. Nantucket Airport Commission - SE48-349 - Nantucket Shipyard
South. Peter Dunwiddie read an annotated letter from the Coast
Guard, sent by Joseph Forns of Applied Marine Ecology Lab. The
Commission did not feel this qualified as a true Letter of
Adequacy, as required in the Order of Conditions, Special
Condition #4.
Lynn Zimmerman of the Nantucket Land Council had spoken with
Chief Petty Officer Vaneska who said there were no plans to
issue a Letter of Adequacy on the project and he would bring it
up at a meeting in 2 weeks. LYnn had noticed a personnell shack
on the plans and Mr. Vaneska .said it was not present on the
original plans. Use of a LARC amphibious vehicle on the site
was discussed.
Ben McKelway was asked to send a letter to Mr. Forns saying the
Commission would not issue an Extension Permit until a real
Letter of Adequacy is received and that construction may not
begin until it is received. Mr. Forns would be asked to attend
the April 28, 1988 meeting to discuss the matter. A copy of the
letter will go to the Nantucket Airport Commission.
3. Orders of Conditions
a. Monomoy Harbor Realty Trust - SE48-465 - 60 Monomoy Road. A
draft Order of Conditions was read by Ben McKelway. He had
consulted Beth Goodman in Town Council's office about a certain
sentence in #8 of the draft -- ongoing maintenance
,-."
,
Town of Nantucket
Conservation Commission
Town and County Building
Nantucket, Massachusetts 02554
Minutes of April 14, 1988 Page 9
responsibilities -- and she said the sentence was OK but
probably not needed. The Commission decided not to use that
sentence in the Order.
A motion was made to issue the draft Order of Conditions as
written to include the latest replication plans submitted at
this meeting. The motion was carried.
b. Sam and Rita Stark - SE48-470 - 39 Millbrook Road. A motion
was made to issue a standard Order of Conditions to include the
following Special Conditions:
1. The cottage must be at least 55 feet from the edge of the
wetland vegetation as shown on the plan.
2. There shall be no brushcutting more than 10 feet from the
cottage on the pond side of the cottage.
3. Prior to any activity at the site, a row of staked haybales
shall be installed 10 feet from the foundation, as shown on the
plan. Erected to mitigate for any siltation which might wash
into the wetland during construction, the haybale line will also
serve as a limit of construction for work crews. The haybale
line shall remain in good repair during all phases of
construction and it shall not be removed until all soils are
stabilized and seeded or until permission to remove it is given
by the Commission.
4. Natural vegetation between the wetland edge and the new
construction will be left intact. Once the building is
constructed, any disturbed area within this buffer area will be
replanted with native plants.
The motion was carried.
c. Tobey G. Shaw - SE48-479 - 117 Baxter Road. A motion was
made to issue a standard Order of Conditions referencing the
most recent plans and containing the following Special
Conditions:
--
\
I
Town of Nantucket
Conservation Commission
Town and County Building
Nantucket, Massachusetts 02554
Minutes of April 14, 1988 Page 10
1. Section 30(3) of the Wetlands Regulations, promulgated under
G.L. c. 131, s. 40, requires that no coastal engineering
structure, such as a bulkhead, revetment, or seawall, shall be
permitted on an eroding bank at any time in the future to
protect the project allowed by this Order of Conditions.
2. The house shall be moved as far back from the edge of the
bluff as possible.
3. Construction activity shall stay as far back from the edge
of the bluff as possible.
The motion was carried.
4. Planning Board Referral
a. Norman and Lila Raben - Eel Point Road. A motion was made
to send a standard letter advising the Nantucket Planning Board
that the existing structures at Raben, Eel Point Road are not
subject to the Wetlands Protection Act. However, since
everything within 100 ft. of the dune comes under Conservation
Commission jurisdiction, if the property owners are planning any
activity within that Buffer Zone, they should first file a
Notice of Intent. The existing structures are about 105 ft.
from the dune. The motion was carried.
5. Correspondence
All correspondence was read and accepted.
6. Minutes of March 31, 1988. A motion was made to accept the
Minutes as written with the following change:
* p.-7: paragraph *1 - add after "affected." the following
sentence: "He also stated the Commission had not acted with
leniency in the past. When asked to cite some examples, Mr.
Tillotson could not think of any."
The motion was carried.
\
\
\
\
\
,~
\
Town of Nantucket
Conservation Commission
Town and County Building
Nantucket, Massachusetts 02554
Minutes of April 14, 1988 Page 11
7. Other Business
a. Susan Spring - SE48-250 - 339 Polpis Road. A letter had
been sent instructing Ms. Spring to appear at tonight's meeting
to discuss brushcutting on her lot down to the edge of a pond.
She was not present, but a letter from her was read stating she
did not realize the activity was a violation.
The pros and cons of brushcutting on Nantucket were discussed.
Donald Visco expressed some of his views on brushcutting in
general saying he thought the Island was becoming overgrown and
that habitat for deer, rabbits and small rodents which can carry
deer ticks seems to be increasing. Since there are very few
grazing animals anymore which tend to maintain open grassland
habitat, Donald felt the Commission should support methods of
management used to keep land open. Peter Dunwiddie agreed with
Donald and talked about his years of ongoing research with the
Massachusetts Audubon Society using controlled burning as a
management option on Nantucket. However, Peter strongly felt
that when brushcutting is to occur within the Buffer Zone,
Notices of Intent must be filed. Lee Dunn also agreed.
Henry Wasierski suggested that contractors hired to do the
brushcutting are also responsible for knowing the regulations
and thought getting the brochure out as soon as possible to
various Island sources was imperative to increasing the public's
awareness on these matters. Carl Borchert gave a brief history
of this lot and said brushcutting had occurred 4 years ago. He
noted that it had certainly grown back. Peter Dunwiddie added,
however, that ignorance of the regulations is no excuse for
violating them. Henry also went on to suggest sponsoring a
public workshop to help contractors, professionals and laypeople
understand the new wetlands regulations and thought it would
have a lot of interest.
Ben McKelway was instructed to send Ms. Spring a letter stating
that the Commission decided not to pursue this matter further at
this time, however reminding her that no activity will be
allowed within 100 ft. of any wetland vegetation without the
prior filing with and approval from the Commission.
.-......
~
Town of Nantucket
Conservation Commission
Town and County Building
Nantucket, Massachusetts 02554
Minutes of April 14. 1988 Page 12
Glen Wills of Nantucket Surveyors reported that Ms. Spring had
asked him to keep his ears open at the meeting. She had thought
that since the lot had been brushcut before, it was OK to do it
again. She had expressed a willingness to comply with whatever
the Commission would require and thought it would revegetate
itself.
b. Bruce Killen - SE48-359 - 67 Cliff Road. Donald Visco
abstained from the discussion. Glen Wills of Nantucket
Surveyors was present as agent for Mr. Killen and presented
revised plans. He said Dave Champoux had advised Mr. Killen to
wait until spring to revegetate that portion of wetlands on the
lot that had been accidentally cleared. There was discussion
comparing the old plans with the revised ones.
Carl Borchert thought Mr. Killen had made a good faith effort to
respond to the Enforcement Order. The December 1987 plans would
be considered the final plans. Mr. Wills said there is no
provision he knew of for releasing an Enforcement Order from a
deed. Carl thought when a Certificate of Compliance is issued,
a Special Condition which supersedes the Enforcement Order may
be written into it. Ben McKelway was instructed to send Mr.
Killen a letter giving him permission to proceed with the new
planting schedule received April 11, 1988 and stating that the
cease and desist provision of the Enforcement Order is lifted.
c. John Nightengale - Wauwinet Road - discussion. Carl
Borchert reported on a violation whereby a number (45 total) of
mature tupelo, sassafras and red maple trees had been cut in a
wooded swamp on the lot. He read a field inspection report from
a Determination of Applicability dated Feb. 20, 1984 which said
a Notice of Intent was required for any work done at this site.
Ben McKelway had spoken with Mr. Nightengale who could not be
present and he said he had not been aware of any wetlands
regulations to which he was subject when he cut the trees. In
fact he said when he purchased the lot, a real estate agent had
even suggested he might wish to do so in order to improve his
views of Polpis Harbor. Ben had drafted a list of enforcement
options to deal with the violation.
UO!SS!WWOJ UOHQAJ8SUOJ
le~anlugN JO UMol
KSZO sllasnq:>lfSS'8W '~:m~N
BUlPnna: A1DDOO po UIAO.L
~t aSEd 886! '~! T1~d~ JO sa+nu1W
'pa1~~Eo se~ U01+0W aqx 'epUaSE 886!
'Z! ^EW aq+ UO ~EaddE 0+ aW1+ U1 apew aq +snw SU~T~~ aq~ 'o+a
'~a+aWE1P ~~+ 'sa1oads ~q pa~o~+sap sae~+ TTe JO ~~o+ua^u1
a+aTdwoo E SU1pnTou1 PUE U01SS1WWOO aq+ 0+ aTqe+daooe +uE+Tnsuoo
e ~q auop +uawssasse a~EWEp paT1e+ap E apnTou1 +snw a01+oN aqx
'SS6! '6Z T1~d~ ~q peT1J u01+e~0+sa~ TTnJ e ~OJ +ua+uI JO a01+oN
E JO ~u1T1J eq+ ~u1pnTou1 SU01S1^0~d q+1~ ~ap~o +uaweo~oJu~
ue anss1 0+ apEW se~ U01+0W E 'u01+e~ap1SUoo awos ~e+J~
'OSE sq+UOW
~aJ E u01+ua++e SIU01SS~WWOO eq+ 0+ s1q+ SU1~q 0+ pa1~+ peq
aq P1es 1~s~a1sEM ~uaH 'U01+eo1TddE TEU1S1~0 aq+ JO +~Ed uaaq
+ou peq q01q~ ~ooTJ puooas e pEq ~OU SU1TTa~p aq+ +Eq+ pa+ou
PUE ^q~eau +oa~o~d ~aq+oue SU1~a1^ aT1q~ ssa~So~d u1 +oa~o~d aq+
pao1+ou wea+ u01+oadsu1 PTa~J aq+ +eq+ pa+ou +~eqo~og T~EO
'u01ssnos1P - +e~epew "eA~ s++asnqoessew - aU1Aa~ U1+~EW 'p
'~a++Ew aq+
ssnos1P 0+ SUETd SU1~~0~ aq+ q+~~ ~u1+aaw BS6! 'BZ T1~d~ aq+ +e
~Eadde 0+ W1q SU1~SE aU1Aa~ .~ a+1~ 0+ pa~SE SE~ ^E~Ta~ow uag
'+uewaounouuE TE~eua5 'OO'S$
_ ~ou eTqET1EAE TEU1J - Su01+ETn~eE spUET+aM +a~on+UEN 'a
'Su01s1Aa~ a~n+nJ
~OJ u01+epuewwooe~ E a~w PUE +1 0+u1 ~ooT 0+ pea~Se ^E~Te~ow
uag 'seqoeeq TE+SEOO uo ~u1qs1ueTda~ ~oJ u01s1AO~d ou pa~oqs
suo~+ETn~e~ spUET+a~ ~eu aq+ +eq+ peu01+uaw s~o~eA~ns +e~on+ueN
JO sTT1M ueT5 'o1Tqnd PUE ssa~d wO~J su01+sanb 's+uewwoo 'J
'Wd SS:O! +E peu~no~pE ~u1+aaw eq+ 'ssau1snq ~aq+o ou ~u1eq a~aq~