Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1988-03-17 '. ~~' , ) Town of Nantucket Conservation Commission Town and County Building Nantucket, Massachusetts 02554 AGENDA FOR ~illRCH 17, 1988 A. PUBLIC HEAEINGS 1. Joseph & Joan Cochran ET AL - E;E48-442 - 5.[.. & 56 No. Beach St. 2. J. Pepper Frazier .- SE48-"':',5 - 3'/ Gardner Road 3. YIonomoy Harbor Realty Trust - SE,*8-46'.:, - 6) llIionomoy Road ~. J. Sew~rd :oh~Eon, Jr. - Almanac Pond Road (cont.- 3/17/88) 5. K & B Realty Trust - SE~8-469 - Crooked Lane 6. Sam & Ri<:a St.ark - SE48-l,.70 - 39 Millbrod: ROed 7. Anna F. Gelding - 99 Baxter Road 8 . ~J,~r~t'lck€.t, (:OITh"TIt)r;s 1irust - Pleasant :3tl--eet B. REGULAR IVJEETIl\G 1. IVlinut.es Minutes Minutes ~")f ~"'\ebrtlar)i c;f .tc'ebru,ar:t~ of r"larch 3, 1~ 1C:pc, ........, -'-- ~ ~, I,J 2.5, 1988 3..988 2 . Other Bu::;iness a. LTim Gay - S/:T h1auwinet Trust - SE48- 392 - prop. pier D. Warren's Landing - open bids for clearing pines c. Old "bylaws" - save some as amend.'T',e:1t:=. to ne,,! regs'? d. M.-3.rcia. Litchfiel-:i - lett.er to re~~. lea'\.,re ,"jf abse11ce e. Na!7ie- 1:"E:F\!:."esentati'\Te (s; tCi ne\..,r ~~lar-jc,r ::::tu:jy.. cc:rrmi ttee f. 1?12!1nea. reno'fv2.'tion of vJl:itetieac tl~~use at Sanl{at.y B111ff g. .F'i__:.Ddj_=-~g C'l"ts - twc~ warrallt ,3.!....tic:le aCCOUI1-c.;2', h. E:.il2. };"e~'ldirlg" .3.bc)ut Ste~.51"'li1-J Aut.hoI"i-t:y Request.2 !:~:):r- De~~errr~inat':c:-l a.. Henl-~l })::'i!~e/I)a~l A}:t .- 12 ~'.5.1-Itemc: t'\.1a~T, (;:"~5C:() t.l.. l'Jarlt.'l.1c}:et (~orr:nons T1....ust - F'leasa:1t. ::,:.J~:reet 'J ~. . ~. Certj_ficates of Complia~~e d. PerKil:5 - La?rence - S~4e-286 - 'Talley View Dri~Te 1.:1. h,7Ci'~~C.':)~l-"l I.ia::e - SELr8- ~:::: -- r~2.r-:.i2.1 (~E':cT".IC(i~tp f-::::.-- I~c;t. 3 5. Orde~'2 ~~ ::cnditioDS 2... ~J .?~:le' ::.~ =rr is c c~ II CI:-1e v.,=-~....,; ~.. -- J CJ 51:ll"'t';l SE/~3-('7l -- 6 . ~5il::'~~" ~"-:-' De ;;ai..: 7. (~cl:r.re s 1=iC):1::e:!""~ ce o u. ?iel:j l~spect~c~s a.. -="'/ ,-; t'~~e.;l~~lj.net. T::ust - ~'"E,*8 -:3 9:2 - l'\1a~.:wine~ - ];"ro~'o5ed. :f:lier b. Bob XcSra~h - road along Miaoomet Pond c. D::. l-2en=--~J L. Price/Fjaul Axt .- 12 Tauter:1() Wa:,; 1 ':;isco - FPD d. Anna Gelding - 99 B;:?):ter Read - NOl e. Na~tucket CCm~ons - Bear & Pleasant 8tree~5 f. Top~end Properties - Low Beach Road - NOI ------ \ I Town of Nantucket Conservation Commission Town and County Building Nantucket, Massachusetts 02554 Minutes of March 17, 1988 Page 1 MINUTES OF MARCH 17, 1988 The public hearings of March 17, 1988 were called to order at 7:33 PM. Members present were: Peter W. Dunwiddie - Chairman, Lee Dunn, William Willet, Donal& Visco and Henry Wasierski. Members absent were: Carl Borchert and Granville Cranston. Administrator present: Ben McKelway. A. PUBLIC HEARINGS 1. Joseph and Joan Cochran ET AL - SE~8-~~2 - 5~ & 56 North Beach Street. Ted Tillotson of Sherburne, Powers and Needham, agent for the applicant, had made a request that day for a continuance of the hearing due to John Shugrue, another agent for the applicant, being out of town. A motion was made to continue the hearing at the request of the applicant. The motion was carried. 2. J. Pepper Frazier - SEi!8-~55 - 37 Gardner Road. Kevin Dale of Vaughan, Dale and Philbrick and Tina Coughanour of IEP were present as agents for the applicant. Robert Daylor of Daylor Consulting Group was present as agent for opposing abutters. Bill Willet abstained from the hearing. Mr. Daylor submitted a review of the Notice of Intent and exhibits on behalf of a direct abutter to the south, Richard F. Tucker. In sum, he recommended the following issues be clarified prior to the issuance of any Order of Conditions: 1. The limited upland portion of the lot would be intensely developed including locating one of the two buildings within the 100 year flood plain. The driveway and parking area for the building nearest the salt marsh would be below the flood level. 2. The plans should specify that there is no habitable space within the foundation nor will that space be used for utilities that cannot be flood-proofed. /"1 Town of Nantucket Conservation Commission Town and County Building Nantucket, Massachusetts 02554 Minutes of March 17, 1988 Page 2 3. There are no first floor structural elements that sit in beam pockets or internal piers that are below the flood level or proof that such structural elements will be "adequately anchored" to prevent later movement during flooding. Otherwise, Mr. Daylor concluded that IEP's calculations and analysis represented a reasonable professional evaluation of the hydrogeological conditions at the site, although different conclusions may have been drawn had a full 12 hour tidal cycle been observed. He also recommended the Commission consider not allowing any work in Gardner Road for reasons of relocating an existing way across the Everett H. Crosby land to a site at a lower floodplain elevation. In general he felt the interests of the Act would not be protected if the house closest to the Karp residence were built. Ms. Coughanour felt the short observation time in documenting possible tidal effects on ground water elevations had been sufficient and found conductivity to be very slow. She said the existing road is already in a floodplain and would have a maximum of 6 inches during a 100 year flood. Mr. Dale responded to the question from the last meeting about a note on the title about the Wetlands Restriction Act. He said it did not apply to this portion of the lot, but does to another. He added that the above-mentioned access road to the Crosby's is really a private road. Lynn Zimmerman of the Nantucket Land Council asked if the Commission was going to consider this a coastal bank. Ms. Coughanour referred her to Exhibit D from one month ago and elaborated on the definition. She said the site exhibits good slope stability and should not be considered a coastal bank. Lynn pointed out that in the Willet case of Fall 1987, DEQE had considered that section of Monomoy to be a coastal bank even though the presumptions of significance were overcome. /""l. Town of Nantucket Conservation Commission Town and County Building Nantucket, Massachusetts 02554 Minutes of March 17, 1988 Page 3 Peter Dunwiddie asked Mr. Daylor to comment on the DEQE's coastal bank definition. Mr. Daylor said he was in basic disagreement with the state on this. Any bank which does not contribute to the various coastal processes cannot in his opinion be considered a coastal bank. Ms. Coughanour said many towns determine a coastal bank using a 15 - 18 degree basis. She said, though, the main consideration should be determining what effect the project will have on the stability of the area in question. Henry Wasierski moved to close the hearing. The motion was carried. 3. Monomoy Harbor Realty Trust - SE~8-i!65 - 60 Monomoy Road. Attorney Kevin Dale was present with Tina Coughanour as agents with the applicant, Mrs. Dujardin. They submitted 2 alternate plans. One plan SP-l had moved the dwelling further back from the wetland yet had kept the replication plans and the filling of the wetland in order to build the garage. The other plan SP-2 had no replication nor filling, but placed the dwelling a mere i! feet away from the wetland in a buildable area. Ms. Coughanour said the Commission now needed to place a value on the wetland. Peter Dunwiddie stressed the Commission had tried to avoid condoning replication and setting the precedent of filling part/all of any wetland in order to build. He also preferred to not have to place any value on the wetland. Donald Visco asked for clarification from Tina on exactly how replication would be carried out if allowed. Debbie Nicholson, speaking on the behalf of abutters Mr. Ernst and Mr. and Mrs. Bessie, said they were all concerned with any possible alternation of the ditch system. They acknowledged a mosquito problem in the area, yet did not want to see the drainage and flow stalled or changed in a negative way. -, Town of Nantucket Conservation Commission Town and County Building Nantucket, Massachusetts 02554 Minutes of March 17, 1988 Page ~ The two plans were discussed and compared at length. Lee Dunn thought SP-1 had some merit and assuming the replication was successful would be beneficial to wildlife. Ms. Coughanour offered to supply periodic reports on the success of the replication. Lee also thought if the Commission was concerned about setting a precedent, then the ~ ft. buffer zone in SP-2 would be stretching things. He askied Mrs. Dujardin which plan she would prefer and she said SP-1 which placed the house furthest away from the wetland. Donald Visco pointed out that monetary considerations are always important and in this case replication would represent quite an investment. Although Lee Dunn thought this may be a somewhat marginal wetland, he was concerned about any filling. Donald cited many cases in the past when the Commission itself had filled wetlands. Bill Willet liked plan SP-2. The consensus of the Commission favored SP-2. Lee Dunn suggested the applicant supply the following information: * specific and precise measurements shown on the plan for distances to the wetland from the house. * the location of siltation fences. * finished elevation at the house. * a written description of construction. * detail on pedestrian traffic, the bridge and any cutting to be done. A motion was made to continue the hearing for more information from the applicant. The motion was carried. i!. J. Seward Johnson, Jr. - Almanac Pond Road. Jack Ranieri was present as agent for the applicant. Bill Willet abstained from the hearing. Mr. Ranieri produced an as-built septic plan, as requested. said if it was ever to be expanded, it would be on the side from the wetland. He estimated 100 cu. yds. of fill. The toilet and bathing stall would go into the existing septic system. He away /, Town Conservation of Nantucket Commission Town and County Building Nantucket, Massachusetts 02554 Minutes of March 17, 1988 Page 5 Lee Dunn thought the plans still seemed somewhat incomplete. They needed to show protective measures like staked haybales, finished grading plans and contours, and firm distances to the wetland. Lynn Zimmerman of the Nantucket Land Council asked how many horses the barn could potentially hold. Mr. Ranieri said 6. Lynn said livestock typically produce large volumes of urine and thought there may be some negative effects on the wetland or water table from nitrate loading. Mr. Ranieri said all manure would be trucked off the site, but did not know where to. Donald Visco said he often gets requests for fresh manure. Donald also thought this matter would best be addressed by the Nantucket Board of Health which has regulations for the storage of manure. Peter Dunwiddie asked Ms. Zimmerman to check with the Board of Health on volume of nitrates produced by livestock and protection from them, and asked Mr. Ranieri to contact the Soil Conservation Service about this and manure disposal. A motion was made to continue the hearing for more information from the applicant and a DEQE file number. 5. K. & B. Realty Trust - SE48-i!69 - Crooked Lane. Robert Daylor of the Daylor Consulting Group was present as agent for the applicant. He had decided to connect to the Town sewer using 3 possible routes. He recommended the plan to hook up to the West Chester Street system using grinder pumps to tie together and thus eliminate anyon-site sewage disposal systems. Discussion surrounded a generator designed to carry a 3-day power outage, the fiberglass tanks and their watertightness and anchoring. The finished grade will match the existing grade. The plan has been run by the Nantucket DPW and met their approval. Peter Dunwiddie wanted more detail about the replication schedule. He wanted a special condition requiring success within one growing season. i_____ ) Town of Nantucket Conservation Cotnmission Town and County Building Nantucket, Massachusetts 02554 Minutes of March 17, 1988 Page 6 A motion was made to close the hearing. The motion was carried. 6. Sam and Rita Stark - SE~8-i!70 - 39 Millbrook Road. Mr. Stark had requested a continuance of the hearing pending the return of his agent John Shugrue from vacation. A motion was made to continue the hearing at the request of the applicant. The motion was carried. 7. Anna F. Golding - 99 Baxter Road. Melissa Philbrick of Vaughan, Dale and Philbrick was present as attorney for the applicant. This is the i!th house so far to be relocated back from the eroding bluff. Ms. Philbrick said the applicant wishes to begin work around April 1, 1988. A motion was made to continue the hearing for a DEQE file number. The motion was carried. 8. Nantucket Commons Trust - Pleasant Street. Garrett Hollands, Vice President and Principal Geologist of IEP, Inc., was present as agent for the applicant and Ted Tillotson of Sherburne, Powers and Needham was present as attorney for same. Mr. Hollands gave a presentation in which he requested a waiver of the former 25 ft. setback from wetlands. He was not aware this application had been filed under the newly adopted Nantucket Wetlands Regulations with an actual received date of February 26, 1988 in its complete form. The new regulations require a 50 ft. setback from wetlands. Nevertheless, Mr. Hollands insisted that the wetland in question was of low vegetative and wildlife value and that no construction would take place in the wetland itself. The proposed building would be 6 ft. away from the wetland at its closest point, and, perhaps more importantly, would span over half its length along one side and cover i!OOO sq. ft. He believed construction could be safely carried out this close to the wetland with no serious damage. He also suggested the Commission should consider a waiver for what he considered exceptional circumstances. '1 Town of Nantucket Conservation Commission Town and County Building Nantucket. Massachusetts 02554 Minutes. of March 17, 1988 Page 7 Emily Austen, a private citizen, considered the development in this area as a complete blight on the Town of Nantucket, felt the applicant's methods were questionable and that he was attempting to coerce the Town to permit him to build in a wetland. She felt this was a undoubtedly a wetland. Lynn Zimmerman of the Nantucket Land Council saw this argument, and those in the past with this applicant, as being reversed of what it should be: the applicant argues that since the wetlands in this area are small and of low value, then development should be permitted. Lynn felt that since the wetlands ~ small and QQ harbor wildlife in an urban setting, then they should be protected. She questioned the applicant's wildlife inventory which she thought had been done in mid-winter. Mr. Hollands said there had also been a survey done in July which still had determined low wildlife value. Lynn continued by suggesting the Commission should take advantage of the new local regulations and the existing bylaw to protect wildlife in this area. In addition, she did not feel this application was worthy of being considered under "exceptional circumstances" as Mr. Hollands had suggested. John Austen, as a private citizen, urged the Commission to hold to their 50 ft. setback restriction and was worried the construction debris would be found in the wetland. Ms. Zimmerman read from section 302-B of the new Nantucket Wetlands Regulations. There was further discussion about the proposed distances from the wetland. Peter Dunwiddie was concerned about protection measures. Lee Dunn read from the regulations about waivers being used only in rare and unusual cases. The underneath parking and the size of the building were discussed. Ted Tillotson said it was designed to cut down on the amount of paved area in the development and would be ~ ft. above the wetland. Peter Dunwiddie had trouble accepting testimony that a building this large would not have any negative Town of Nantucket Conservation Commission Town and County Building Nantucket. Massachusetts 02554 Minutes of March 17, 1988 Page e effects on a wetland that small. Mr. Hollands said he never claimed it would not have any negative effects, but again stressed his view that this was a low value urban wetland. Lee Dunn was concerned that shading from the building would have a negative effect. Mr. Tillotson thought the building would be to the north of the wetland and therefore shading would not be a problem. Mr. Hollands elaborated on the use of arbitrary setback measurements and questioned the scientific basis for the 50 ft. in the regulations. In this case, he saw so little wildlife value that there was really no need for a setback. Peter Dunwiddie responded by stating it was the Commission's duty to minimize the negative effects on wetlands and their wildlife in general. Mr. Hollands then conceded at this point that it only made sense to continue this hearing if the Commission would consider waiving the 50 ft. setback. Mr. Tillotson added that the applicant was only trying to excercise his legal rights to build and asked the Commission to respect DEQE's past determination about the status of this wetland. He said they should not be considered evil just because they were on the side of the fence opposite from the Commission. Mr. Hollands cited this case as not being an unusual situation and said similar projects happen elsewhere with success. He said just because this may be a first case here, that is no reason for denial. There was discussion about the fact that a DEQE file number would not be issued, since the Notice of Intent was filed only under the Nantucket Wetlands Protection Bylaw. The Commission decided to issue its own file number - NANT88-1. A motion was made to close the hearing. The motion was carried with a unanimous vote. Peter Dunwiddie asked Ben McKelway to draft both a denial and an Order of Conditions with Findings, Discussion and Special Conditions. The Commission would issue one or the other at the meeting of March 31, 1988. ,------- Town of Nantucket Conservation Commission Town and County Building Nantucket, Massachusetts 02554 Minutes of March 17, 1988 Page 9 B. REGULAR MEETING 1. Minutes of February 18, 1988. The Commission decided to accept the minutes at the March 31, 1988 meeting. Minutes of February 25, 1988. The Commission decided to accept the minutes at the March 31, 1988 meeting. Minutes of March 3, 1988. The Commission decided to accept the minutes at the March 31, 1988 meeting. A request was made to place the Minutes at the end of Agendas for future meetings. 2. Other Business a. Jim Gay - S/J Wauwinet Trust - SEq.8-392 - proposed pier. Mr. Gay and Joseph Forns were present to discuss proposed plans for a pier at the Wauwinet House and 2 outdoor showers to be built 75 ft. away from the Harbor. He said there had been a long pier there historically and the one proposed would be seasonal. Peter Dunwiddie and Lee Dunn felt the pier project needed to have a Notice of Intent because of possible public controversy and the need for details and conditions. Mr. Gay was asked to send a letter with details of the shower set-up and he agreed to do so. Henry Wasierski favored using cold water only to discourage the use of soap and thus avoid possible contamination. He also thought there could be a problem with the plumbing inspector about dealing with gray water. b. Warren's Landing - open bids for clearing pines. One bid was received from Frank Powers, Jr. in the amount of $2800.00. Since there was only $1600.00 available in the budget, the Commission decided to put out another bid for the brushcutting of pine seedlings only and asking for an hourly fee, specification of the horsepower of the tractor and the width of ') Town of Nantucket Conservation Commission Town and County Building Nantucket, Massachusetts 02554 Minutes of March 17, 1988 Page 10 the cutter to be used. The bid must include an estimate of the number of hours needed to complete the work. Ben McKelway agreed to send Mr. Powers a letter in response to his bid. INSERT: b. I Robert Daylor - Wayne Dupont - Codfish Park Road - req. to amend Order of Conditions. Ben McKelway reported on the issue at hand whereby DEQE had intervened after an Order of Conditions had been issued on Jan. 26, 1988 by the Commission. Robert Daylor, agent for the applicant, requested an amended Order to reflect concerns by DEQE rather than wait the several months it would take DEQE to issue a Superseding Order. He had submitted a letter with a supplemental plan attached, stating that DEQE had agreed to withdraw its appeal if the Commission granted his request, provided the addition to the home is built on pilings. He recommended advertising for a Public Hearing and issuing an amended Order at the meeting of March 31, 1988. Ben McKelway said the arrangement Mr. Daylor proposed did not match what DEQE environmental engineer Lealdon Langley had told him shortly before the site visit, which was that the case would have to be formally remanded to the Commission before there could be any further local action. He said he had tried unsuccessfully to contact Mr. Langley and confirm Mr. Daylor's new arrangement. After some discussion about the changes in the supplemental plan including the addition being on pilings and the garage being made a separate structure, a motion was made to send a letter confirming that the supplemental site plan accompanying the request for an amended Order of Conditions constituted a minor change to the original plans as submitted and therefore neither an amended Order nor the filing of a new Notice of Intent is required. The motion was carried. Mr. McKelway said DEQE policy frowns on this method of dealing with plan changes and instead requires either a new Notice of Intent (leading to a new public hearing and a new Order) or a new public hearing and a formal amended Order. He asked the Commission not to do this again in the future. Ben was asked to produce written evidence from DEQE as proof of this policy. ... ----.. '1 Town of Nantucket Conservation Commission Town and County Building Nantucket. Massachusetts 02554 Minutes of March 17, 1988 Page 11 Garrett Hollands, Vice President of rEP and a member of the public in this instance, commented that the Commission's vote tonight was appropriate because the changes were in the direction of decreased impact on the wetland. He said it is wise to keep this in mind in the future: consider whether the changes being proposed are of equal or lesser impact than the original plans. Sarah Alger, of Reade and Alger and member of the public in this instance, disagreed with Mr. McKelway and thought the Commission does have the latitude to make determinations of insignificance for changes in plans and was acting properly. Peter Dunwiddie added that he felt it was prudent to try to simplify the pape~~ork in these instances and if DEQE's recommendations were followed exactly, it could lead to a beaureaucratic nightmare. He thought it was best to rely on the Commission's best judgment. c. Old "bylaws" - save some as amendments to new regs? The Commission decided to make no changes and to notify Town Counsel's office to go ahead and print up the final Nantucket Wetlands Regulations as promulgated February 25. Joseph Forns was present to discuss maintenance work needed on some Hulbert Ave. groins. There was discussion about what the new regulations allow for and where to draw the line for requiring the filing of Requests for Determination and Notices of Intent. Donald Visco said ongoing maintenance is allowed for lawfully existing structures. Mr. Forns also pointed out a discrepancy in the new regulations in sections 2.02 B-4 and 2.03 B-l.!- dealing with coastal fill and beach nourishment. He thought they should read similarly. After some discussion, Ben McKelway was asked to keep a running file on possible revisions to the regulations in the future. , r, Town of Nantucket Conservation Commission Town and County Building Nantucket, Massachusetts 02554 Minutes of March 17, 1988 Page 12 d. Marcia Litchfield - letter to request leave of absence. A letter was read from Secretary Marcia Litchfield informing the Commission she had accepted a seasonal position as tern warden for the Nantucket Least Tern/Piping Plover Protection Program run by the Trustees of Reservations. The full-time committment would span the period May 15 - August 15, 1988. She respectfully requested a leave of absence for the period. There was some discussion about the probability of filling the position for the 3 - month period. Marcia felt the leave coincided with most academic schedules and would be excellent experience for students in a variety of fields including environmental studies, natural resources management, biology and law. She also asked for the Commission's support of the Least Tern/Piping Plover Program in this way and felt it would be of interest to the Commission since it involved management of protected waterbirds nesting in wetland resource areas. Other coastal Commissions in the state support such programs. Henry Wasierski thought the leave should be granted. He asked Marcia if she would leave the position altogether if the request were denied, and she said yes. Peter Dunwiddie was worried that the position might not fill on a temporary basis and wished to advertise it for 2 weeks. Based on the response, he thought the Commission would be better able to consider the request. He was interested in maintaining flexibility for the Commission and have things go as smoothly as possible. The request was tabled until the March 31, 1988 meeting. e. Name representative(s) to new harbor study committee. This item tabled until March 31, 1988. f. Planned renovation of Whitehead house at Sankaty Bluff. Not discussed. g. Funding cuts - two warrant article accounts. Ben McKelway reported that the Conservation Commission account for Weed Control, #A79/80/81 in the amount of $3692.00, will be OJ Town of Nantucket Conservation Commission Town and County Building Nantucket, Massachusetts 02554 Minutes of March 17, 1988 Page 13 eliminated by Finance Committee Cutbacks as of March 1~, 1988. Therefore, the past balance due on an Inquirer and Mirror bill dating back to 1982 will have to be paid out of General Town Funds and voted on under Unpaid Bills at Town Meeting, rather than be paid out of this account. Thus, there will be no remainder to be transferred into the Warren's Landing account. The Fincom had originally considered cutting the remainder of the Recreation Area Maintenance budget but reconsidered. h. Bill pending about Steamship Authority. Not discussed. Henry Wasierski and Peter Dunwiddie urged Mr. McKelway to place fewer Other Business items on the agenda in the future because they felt the Commission's meetings had been dragging on too long lately. 3. Requests for Determination a. Henry Price / Paul Axt - 12 Tautemo Way, Cisco. The Commission had not done a field inspection and asked Ben McKelway to meet at the site with agent Paul Axt before the March 31, 1988 meeting. Ben agreed to do so. Peter Dunwiddie said the Commission would need more detailed plans for the planned construction at the site before they could make a Determination. b. Nantucket Commons Trust - Pleasant Street. Garrett Hollands, Vice President of IEP and agent for the applicant, explained the logic of having filed the Notice of Intent under the local bylaw and this Request under the state Wetlands Protection Act. A motion was made to issue a positive Determination stating the area described in the Request, which includes all/part of the area described in the Request, is an Area Subject to Protection Under the Act. Therefore, any removing, filling, dredging or altering of that area requires the filing of a Notice of Intent. The motion was carried. Lee Dunn left the meeting at 11:00 PM. ~ I Town of Nantucket Conservation Commission Town and County Building Nantucket, Massachusetts 02554 Minutes of March 17, 1988 Page 14 4. Certificates of Compliance a. Perkins - LaFrance - SE48-386 - Valley View Drive. A motion was made to issue a Certificate of Compliance certifying that the work regulated by the above-referenced Order of Conditions has been satisfactorily completed. The motion was carried. b. Woodbury Lane - SE48-312 - partial Cert/Comp for Lot 3. Robert Daylor of Daylor Consulting Group was present as agent for the applicant and had submitted a draft of a partial Certificate of Compliance to cover Lot 3 only, as was discussed at the March 3, 1988 meeting. A motion was made to issue a partial Certificate of Compliance certifying that only the following portions of the work regulated by the above-referenced Order of Conditions have been satisfactorily completed: Building, grading and site preparation on Lot 3 have been satisfactorily completed. Although other work sanctioned by the Order is complete, or in progress, only Lot 3 is included in this Certificate of Compliance. The motion was carried. 5. Orders of Conditions a. James Driscoll - SE48-i!71 - One Osprey Way. A motion was made to issue a standard Order of Conditions to include the following Special Condition: .----... \ Town of Nantucket Conservation Commission Town and County Building Nantucket, Massachusetts 02554 Minutes of March 17, 1988 Page 15 1. Cattails or other appropriate aquatic vegetation will be planted at the toe of the revetment to stabilize and screen the structure. Lee Dunn opposed. ,The motion was carried. The Correspondence was not read and will be taken at the next meeting. There being no other business, the meeting was adjourned at 11:20 PM.