The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1989-09-28 . ,~'1.t~~t'.,' :aa~,> ~~ ~TUC ''"'''~''' .:>Ji'" ~."'''!!.fl~ .~J ()/ ........'V>.. ::..~. ',-;7 \ ~:":f' ,~.-' rt\~~ %to. ',,;(;1.""1..'..::. ',- - . 1':l-"~~~'~ _.1JI1 \1. \~~~9~i'~ D 'i,,,... ~~~':= .,..,.- '~~".. ~~=-,";~$ (Ct, C- '.. --- ....,,'"' ~ .".!'~O~p.........;;'V. "'~ 7/',.;: ORAI"- ~..,,'Ii ~~aaallt\Q Town of Nantucket Conservation Commission (508) 228- 7230 6 Chestnut Street Nantucket, Massachusetts 02554 AGENDA FOR SEPTEMBER 28. 1989 A. ~OMMENTS AND QUESTIONS FROM PRESS AND PUBLIC PUB.J7.lLljJ=:AR I NGS 1. Longview Realty Trust - 53 Madaket Rd. SE48-546 (41-326) 2. Dias - 1 Pilot Whale Lane - SE48-554 ( 67-386,394-403 3. Cabral - 10 Pond Street - SE48-555 (56-294) 4. Swift - 7 Old Quidnet Milk Route - SE48-564 (20-54.3) 5. Wright/Horgan - 29 Medouie Creek Road - SE48-565 (14-35) 6. Sesachacha pond - Board of Selectmen - (23-2) 7. Nantucket Islands Land 8ank - Lily Pond - SE48-566 (42.4.3-47) * 8. Robert Kaye - Top Gale Lane - SE48-567 - (27-7) * 9. R & E Pardi - 26 Washington St. - Nan89-01 (42.3.2-23) * 10. B & M Perry - 4 Midland Ave. - (59.3-170) 1.?_~, c. 8.fGlJ.LAR MEET I NG 1. REQUEST FOR DETERMINATION * a. Cherner/Powers - 192 Hummock Pond Road - (65-32) * b. R & E Pardi - 26 Washington Street - (42.3.2-23) * c. Harde et al - 83 Eel Point Road - (32-12) * d. Weinmar - 79 Baxter Road - (49-32) EXTENSION PERMITS ~ Town of Nantucket Surfs ide Treatment Plant b. Town of Nantucket - Siasconset Treatment Plant c. Heintz/Wolff - 29 Hinkley Lane - SE48-374 (30-22.1) d. Wells - Low Beach Road - SE48-369 - (74-55) CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE a. Airport Commission - SE48-349 - Fuel Pipeline Q. Taylor - 61 Hulbert avenue - SE48-397 (29-10) Pier floats c. Elliott - Elliot's Way - SE48-361 (92.4-319) OTHn< BUS I i\JESS 2. Charles Gifford - SE48-525 (43-180) - Possible violation b. James Hawkes - Ester's Island - Proposal and discussion r Petrucci - SE48-524 - minor modification (move house) d. Leibenhaut - SE48-553 (41-327) - Discussion e. Gifford - SE48-535 (28-9) - Approval Conservation Restrictiol e. Regulation and Fee Change Public Hearing f. Package Treatment Plant Seminar - October 26 g. Cattails at Madaket Road Bridges - Discussion CORRESPO\\lDENCE 6. MINUTES: for August 24, 31, September 14, 1989 at 7 PM 7. SILLS TO BE PAID 8. FIELD INSPECTIONS - Tuesday, October 10, 1989 4 PM EXECUTIVE SESSION - PENDING LITIGATION 2. ..:J. L' t . c * Denotes new application ** Abutter notification mailed late or overdue from last meeting .~~~tt~:3r:t::.) ,f'::\ p.~!y cJrftJJ ')'" ~ r -...<;)o'l-~ ,~.... 0/ ....~ 1- ~ ......~/. ."V~ ~.'l..:' ,__~ t1\(,f\; " O:~~:':'...4)_'U1:Z r:,r;:!!~~,fJ!;fj ~~ 1-........ -,?=:""., .' CO ;: .~ ""0". - .... '" ,-. .~:... 'It p........;, ~. ~ -'G:. ORAil> ~..,,~ ~:':r'I~'U~'l Town of Nantucket Conservation Commission (508) 228- 7230 6 Chestnut Street Nantucket, Massachusetts 02554 Meetinq Minutes September 28~ 1989 The meeting was called to order at 7:04 PM in the Large Group Instruction Room of the Nantucket High School. All the Commissioners were present along with Ben McKelway, Administrator and Bruce Perry, Secretary. A. COMMENTS FROM PRESS AND PUBLIC NONE B . PUBLIC HEARINGS 1. Longview Realty Trust - 53 Madaket Road - SE48-546 (41-326) MOTION: To continue the hearing due to lack of representation and for more information. Also to send a letter to the applicants stating that if there is no representation at the next meeting, the Commission will close the public hearing. UNANIMOUS 2. Dias - 1 Pilot Whale Lane - SE48-554 (67-386,394-403) Commissioner Wasierski abstains from the discussion. Present for the applicant waS John Shugrue, engineer. Mr. Shugrue submits a new plan showing the new contours at the end of work including the area to be replicated. He comments that approximately 362 square feet of wetlands will be filled and that it will be replaced with 400 square feet of replication. The plans are to scoop out the replication area and then add soil and plants from the area to be filled. There was some discussion at the table concerning the replication location and the fact that the plans that the Commission has do not have the proper lots lines. The lines were changed in 1982 during discussion with the Planning Board to allow access to the abutting Ayer property to use the road. 'II'''~,$'tl\7t,. ~ ~i"Uc -"1- ..,p-rotl~~ ......!re-')!'.>. it ()"- ....... ~ .l:~ ..1-\ ~$!1 \~~ EO::~' -:(Jl~ ~~r;:~ " ~:.. i \: .,,"'~-:i;.... -- l....:; ~ A'-" -..~ -- --r.;:.::'- .'1\, ;: ':} r'",... ~-:'- ."<0 .:' ~ ~.o" ....... ...." '!t,' ...~ ~p"""";'Q' ,,0; "~4_ ORAi...,~..,"" -.:.tt~:,~c,a~ Town of Nantucket Conservation Commission (508) 228- 7230 6 Chestnu: Street Nantucket. Massachusetts 02554 Meeting Minutes September 28, 1989 Page 2 Mr. Dunwiddie comments that it would be useful to view the 2ctual replication location. Mr. Dunn adds that the location would be fine as long as other areas of wetland do not get damaged during the replication process. There is no description of where site is or what plants are going to be in it. I do not want to see future Commissioners and staff confused as to which map is the correct one. Mr. Borchert asks when are you going to dig out to create this It-Jetland. Mr. Shugrue responds that you cannot make an wetland grow on an upland. We plan to dig down to the same elevation and then transplant the excavated material from under the proposed road. ( Mr. Shugrue draws a line indicating that the haybales will be located at the toe of the slope.) A Commissioner suggested the use of jute netting to help revegetate the roadside after filling. Mr. Dunn states that he would like to have a plan that clearly indicates what the project is going to do. I would like to see all the aspects summarized on a plan. Mr. Willet suggests that the replication be staked and visited on the next inspection day. Mr. Shugrue agreed to flag this area. Ms. Lynn Zimmerman of the Nantucket Land Council suggests that an inventory of the existing plants be developed. It would be good information to know before the plants are moved. MOTION: To continue the hearing for more information, namely a consolidated plan of the work proposed. This plan should show the whole project on one or two pages and should include proper lot lines, wetland boundaries, construction sequence, etc. This motion was made and seconded. UNANIMOUS !It't<<:~t:::ll ~ ~TUC I~ fl.'" yfl. ..,-!!e-~ .(jI <t -..." fl!. :.' <>.. .......~ " .... ~ \';>' .. "~i . >" '=- ~ .~,~\(J\;' :tIo:,.t;;f~: _ -:Ull! nt-:~~.r -..:"._ 5 . \ ~~~ -~ i : !! U; ~ "". ~~~-- ..;'t i 1.;.1-........ ~,~. - ..'r- ~ .' '-" ".. -.- .." "v... """"O~p........;;~. !'o" 11,.-.' 0."1::' i.. ~..,,'Ii -vqIl1:DU'"'t~' Town of Nantucket Conservation Commission (508) 228- 7230 6 Chestnut Street Nantucket, Massachusetts 02554 Meeting Minutes September 28, 1989 Page 3 Mr. McKelway was instructed to put the site on the schedule for the next field inspections, for an inspection of the proposed replication area and an inventory of the plants in the area to be filled and the area to be replicated. ~. Cabral - 10 Pond Street - SE48-555 (56-294) MOTION: To continue for more information and inspection of the new wetland flagging was made and seconded. UNANIMOUS 4. Swift - 7 Old Quidnet Milk Route - SE48-564 - (20-54.3) Present for the applicant were Melissa Philbrick of Vaughan, Dale and Philbrick and Jeff Blackwell of Hart and Blackwell. Mr. Blackwell submits an engineered plan of the bridge across the ditch. He comments that the plan calls for concrete headwalls to support the stringers that will support the citch. The height of the curb has increased to 18 inches from 12 inches to allow better protection for emergency vehicles. The travelled surface is planned to be two inches higher than the last plan submitted. The dirt at the headwall will be augured out and the remaining dirt will be removed by hand. Mr. Borchert asks that the final Order of Conditions include that method of construction. MOTION: To close the hearing. UNANIMOUS 5. Wright/Horgan - 29 Medouie Creek Road - SE48-565 (14-35) Present were Mr and Mrs. John Horgan, property owners, Gwynne Thorsen, architect, Kent Powell, Landscaper. """,t.~~:~:Ct.:;J. ~"'~','U c,}'J, ,~'v~\f:l.."H....q ....~II! f'''~~ ",."" ;; <:> ....: .., 'to'!. ::~.. .~7 ... ,', Ii: 1 . \"'P ': ~ .~....,."., .1I~(J'l!!. ;:0: r ':fd'i;"*~<;~,-:Ul;J: t~~t~j ".;-'~'" ~~- ....'C ~ COZ... 0'" ... A.;~' .~~ 'tip........... \). ,~ .r"a""" ORAit ~".... ":0:"111'''' Town of Nantucket Conservation Commission (508) 228- 7230 6 Chestnut Street Nantucket. Massachusetts 02554 Meeting Minutes September 28, 1989 Page 4 Mr. Dunn summarizes for the Commission what had occurred at the last meeting and adds that the site is still somewhat a mystery and the ease of moving these trees is still in question. Mr. Borchert reads letter from Kevin Dale, the applicant's counsel, stating that Kenneth Greeno, an off island landscaper, has transplanted tupelo trees with success. The Wrights plan to move the trees in the Spring of 1990 to the area on the submitted plan. They also propose to monitor the transplanted trees for two years and during the Spring of 1993 replace any trees that have died with two inch caliper trees. Mr. Dunwiddie asks the applicants if Mr. Greeno has transplanted clonal trees. Nursery-grown trees are easy to transplant because they are grown individually. The trees on this property are clonal trees. He makes no reference to transplanting clonal trees in his letter. Mr. Powell responds that Mr. Greeno will be working for him on this project. Mr. Dunwiddie asks Mr. Powell if he has transplanted any clonal trees and comments that the applicants are not receiving accurate advice on this matter. Mr. Visco states that the applicant has gone to great effort and expense to meet the Commission's worries and provide transplanting and replication plans. They are going well beyond the requirements of the Commission. They need to do this to allow a reasonable use of their property. Mr. Dunwiddie responds that the Commission needs to require them to more than the minimum. We need be sure that they are going to transplant trees that are going to live. Mr. Wasierski comments that this would be a good opportunity for a test at somebody else's expense. The applicant~ are guaranteeing to replace what is lost. We will be able to go back and learn how the trees are surviving the transplanting. ~,t~;:'t;$J. ~ ~"'Uc .:~ .....~Il- ~~-![1:'~6", 'J' ~ ...r it. .~. () "'A_~ ~~~. ..~7 ~ :.;:?1:/1 '. J,'~~ .,..~,._-,' . ..0. '" -_k.,_~ _.IJI:i . . ., ;;..;:"..>......... .". ... 1:1-.-,"",~.::'-",,,,:,:~,, .. t.:.\Z~~~i~s t...... ~=~....... \.p... -...~"-~=- lA.:: ~"''''''..~-.::''-. .....~'O.$ "'0(.. olj>,;........., <;)' ~.:> .~ rOR.t..i.. ,..... ollI:";,,:al'~' Town of Nantucket Conservation Commission (508) 228- 7230 6 Chestnut Street Nantucket. Massachusetts 02554 Meeting Minutes September 28, 1989 Page 5 Mr. Borchert reads the latest inspection report and comments that the letter from Bill Wilcox dated September 21, 1989 on watering procedures should be identified in the Order Df Conditions. Mr. Visco said he thinks it is in the applicant's own interest to keep the trees alive, therefore a condition about watering procedures would be unnecessary. MOTION: To close the hearing and draft an Order of Conditions for the next meeting was made and seconded. UNANIMOUS 6. Sesachacha Pond - Board of Selectmen - (23-2) MOTION: To continue the hearing at the request of the applicant was made and seconded. UNANIMOUS (Mr. Dunwiddie abstains) 7. Nantucket Land Bank - Lily Pond - SE48-566 (42.4.3-47) Commissioners Visco and Borchert abstain from discussion and any votes. Present for the applicant were Dawn Darbey, Director of the Land Bank and Andrea Stevens, Resource Planner for the Land Bank. Mr. Wasierski asks if DEP has been involved. Mr. McKelway responds that they will review the project when the Order of Conditions is sent up to the state. Mr. Dunn comments that he has no problem with the project but a lot of abutters' complaints need to be addressed, primarily the issue concerning the increased danger created by the pond. Ms. Stevens responds that the deepest part of the pond will be about seven feet with an average depth of five feet. The ,.q,~~S&C~~Irl.r" 4>" ~TUC ~'- r>"'Y~~f). "._J(e-t~ ~.". r:;,<c. -";:"'A~ S~. ";7~ :! !t:!1 \~ ~ i!0i. -jlJl'i ..t-r:"<;::: ~:. : ~. ~..?r--~~'~-=-~;:~ ~;. .... ~~-= ..,....;.... 'Eo ~.. ~~c..:;%=- l" :: '::, (;\..... ~--"" .........'0 ~ ;,,~O.-9::........:;\). ~~ -.",...rORAi.. .,....'Ii """1.t.11t11l8ltll. Town of Nantucket Conservation Commission (508) 228- 7230 6 Chestnut Street Nantucket. Massachusetts 02554 Meeting Minutes September 28, 1989 Page 6 Soil Conservation Service recommends these depth to maintain cpen water environment. The side slopes will be 2:1 in the middle and 4:1 on the side that is now lawn. Ms. Darbey adds that there was some concern over increased town liability because of the pond. We have talked with counsel and they feel that there is no problem as long as the slopes are not any steeper than an child's arm length for each body length. This would allow a child who falls into the pond to be able to push up above the water. These dimensions would rot increase the Town's liability. Mr. Willet reads a letter from Lou Elliott opposing the project. MOTION: To close the hearing and draft an Order of Conditions was made and seconded. UNANIMOUS Mr. McKelway asks the Commission for some judgments he will need in the preparation of the Order under state regulations. There are three choices: 1. The project meets the performance standards of the state regulations. 2. The resource areas are not significant to the relevant interests. 3. The project can be considered a "limited project" under 10.53(4). This would allow the Commissioners to approve the project, even if it does not meet performance standards, because they judge it to be an improvement of the area's capacity to protect the interests identified in the Wetlands Protection Act (i.e. flood control, wildlife habitat, etc.) The Commission advises that the project should be considered a "limited project." ..~,;ti~UCe~l' .~. ~,~TU c;;/~~", ~'e" ~.........t~ ~~ ;::~'/ ..1-'$ !~i1 ...... A\~~ gO: ..~,..:1JI3 1::1-:" ~~:' :: ~ .\~_---~~ I:! ;; ...... ":ST:-::"~~ "A"::: or.A-' - -~- h",. ~'''''^'''' ~,- ..''0 ~ ~ '-'0'" - .... '\ ~.. "..t!O_' 'It ,:......... '\). ~.. ~b:'..ORA,.t. ~..." ~",,, U,,\~' Town of Nantucket Conservation Commission (508) 228- 7230 6 Chestnut Street Nantucket, Massachusetts 02554 Meeting Minutes September 28, 1989 Page 7 8. Robert Kaye - Top Gale Lane - SE48-567 (27-7) Present for the applicant were Foley Vaughan, counsel, and David Haines of Haines Hydrogeologic Consulting. Mr. Vaughan comments that he does not have the abutter notification receipts. The Commission decided to open the hearing under the State regulations only. Before discussing the new Notice of Intent, the Commissioners decide to discuss the changes that had been made in response to several alleged violations of a previous Order of Conditions CSE48-305). Mr. Haines summarizes what has been done to the property since the last meeting with the applicant. The decks have been removed; a new deck has been put on the front of the building; fill has been removed at the back of the building and a new wetland has been created with plants and seed; peat has been brought in to stabilize the sandy fill material; the portion of the siltation fence that had blown down when Mr. McKelway inspected the site recently has been repaired. The present NOI has been filed to complete the tennis court. It only requires paving and a fence. The filling and replication plans were approved in 1986. That Order of Conditions since has expired. The replication is going well and contains high bush blueberries, soft rush and other plants. In this NOI, the court has been slightly reduced in size to fit on to the already filled-in area. Mr. Dunn asks the type of material being used for the court surface. Mr. Haines responds that it will be made up of an all- weather surface. The composition will be asphalt-based with an acrylic top. The retaining walls along the sides of the court are to be 1-2 feet high. Some filled areas not needed for the court will be excavated and the wetland replicated to the edge of the retaining wall, creating an additional 350-400 square feet of wet area. MOTION: To continue the hearing for additional abutter notification, more information and inspection by the Commission was made and seconded. ...:\':::;licr"~ ~"~-UC"""Ol .....\ ~;"...!r.e-'t+.. ~'l C)/ .....'So ~ :ti~.. ...>,,~ ::J:t:!t~~ A\U\: Ii P: ,t.~",,,~:1;2-~- : Vl ~ r:s~-~~~j~; ,:, ~" ~ -~~ /1\ :: ~ "O.....~-""..........~ J' ".... typ........;,., 'V' ..~ "~04.. 0 R i\ \ "' ~........ ..~,,"Gllr; Town of Nantucket Conservation Commission (508) 228- 7230 6 Chestnut Street Nantucket, Massachusetts 02554 Meeting Minutes September 28, 1989 Page 8 UNANIMOUS NOTE: Mr. Vaughan submitted the proper proof the next morning, September 29, that the abutters had indeed been notified in a timely manner. 9. R & E Pardi - 26 Washington Street - NanOl-89 (42.3.2-23) Present was Glen Wills of Nantucket Surveyors Mr. Willet reads the inspection report commenting that the existing deck is fifty feet from the beach. Mr. Wills submits abutter notification and a new plan revised to show that none of the planned additions will go closer to the harbor than the existing footprint. He adds that the property slopes away from the harbor. There has been a change in ownership, and the building is planned to be a residence. The plans meet the 100-year flood plain elevation and the new foundation will be made out of piers like the existing foundation. MOTION: To close the hearing and draft an Order of Conditions was made and seconded. UNANIMOUS 10. B & M Perry - 4 Midland Avenue - (59.3-170) Commissioner Visco abstains from the discussion and vote. Present was Bruce Perry, owner and applicant. Mr. Willet reads the inspection report, which says the wetland is 85-100 feet from the leach trenches but the wetland boundary is uncertain. Mr. Perry adds that the Notice is for replacement of the failed system only. No expansion is planned. The location of the trenches is dictated by the numerous well radii that cross .~il1it-::;re:I._"1 #.r~~TU CJ( "'~ ''''''r~ -~.f')-~. .of': <> ....: .... ~ ~/~.. .~7 ~ ~~!, \~~ E~t ~ -iU': -f, . i.... .,- :~~~~-l/: -. ! ~~-~~~: .... ;,,,... ~..:::.;;-~- .op...;~ ", A_'. - ...~=- /1\. ~ ,".y........ -."'==~, .' 0.. .:- "~.....O.... ~ ... "v ~ ...~ 'Ilp.........~~. ~~ '''';,' ORAl'" t""'; ~1.t3"l'I'~ Town of Nantucket Conservation Commission (508) 228- 7230 6 Chestnut Street Nantucket, Massachusetts 02554 Meeting Minutes September 28, 1989 Page 9 the lot. The only location for the trenches is as shown on the plan. The Board of Health has already granted a sideline variance to allow the leach trenches to be five feet from the property line. Mr. Dunn requests a plan showing the wetland boundaries and distances from the trenches. Mr. McKelway was instructed to put the site on the list for the next field inspections. MOTION: To continue the hearing for additional information and a DEP file number was made and seconded. UNANIMOUS C. REGULAR MEETING 1 . REQUESTS FOR DETERMINATION a. Cherner/Powers - 192 Hummock Pond Road - (65-32) Present was Frank Powers, agent Mr. Willet reads the inspection report, which recommended a negative determination be issued for the tennis court and that a negative determination be issued for the building site with the condition that no structure be closer than the existing dog kennel and that care be taken on the wetland side. MOTION: To issue a Negative Determination with the above referenced conditions was made and seconded. UNANIMOUS 2. R & E Pardi 26 Washington Street - NanOl-89 (42.3.2-23) Present was Glen Wills of Nantucket Surveyors. MOTION: To issue a Negative Determination commenting that the work is within the buffer zone but will not alter the resource area was made and seconded. ~\";::5~elJ . ..~TUCt..'''~ .:" ~--?e-r ~ 1<>/ .....A\ ~~. '.-;" ~ ~~!1 \~~ nO:~' <!:.'}..,~", _:IJI~ .-.- ~, _.- ~ . - :: r- .~.".~,,~~, w ~.\~~~~!~! ,:~;.... ~~2~~- ..^,~ 'C,1-^.. ~~- ..''0 ;: ~ "'0..... ......- ...." ~ '.f...' J/?h.......... '\). ,~ Yb.'rORAic. ~..,.. ""q"':J:!e""~ Town of Nantucket Conservation Commission (508) 228- 7230 6 Chestnut Street Nantucket Massachusetts 02554 Meeting Minutes September 28, 1989 Page 10 UNANIMOUS 3. Harde - 83 Eel Point Road - (32-12) Present was Mrs. Harde. Mr. Willet reads the inspection report, which noted the existing deck is 31 feet from the top of the bank at the corner. The house is 45 feet from the bank. Mr. McKelway recommends a positive Determination, noting that traditionally the Commission has not permitted work at the Determination level if the work does not conform to the Commission's local regulations. Mr. Dunn agrees and comments that he is reluctant to approve any construction closer to the bank. He explains that new construction within the 50-foot setback requires a waiver ~ven if it is no closer to the resource area than the existing structure. Mrs. Harde states that the deck needs to be rebuilt. She explains that although she is requesting that the whole new deck be slightly closer to the bank, the extension of the deck to the west along the house is important to her because it ~ill cover rubble left when the house was moved. After additional discussion the applicant agrees to extend the deck sideways only, and angled somewhat, in order not to build closer to the bank. MOTION: To issue a Negative Determination commenting that the work is within the buffer zone of a resource area but will not alter the area and adding a condition modifying the proposed plans so as not to allow any construction closer to the bank was made and seconded. So voted, with Commissioner Dunn opposing. c. Weinmar - 79 Baxter Road - (49-32) ~t3sa~~'te:'ttl ~~;~V.TUC;~:""""~ .:'f r~ -"",")- . <> ',. !~. ...1--~ :!:l:!, ,.""'" \~-: 1.i~i~~~~:U1i ~.\~~~~~j.:8 'ti.,.,.... ~...:::.;!,.-~- .."~ .-:, '}:.. ~~=- .'^- .. ,,<:'......~'..........'O~ ...,..... O...;>,.,.........;,~. ",0:> -"Jlo.-_rORAi.. ,...... -..:~,;.SQ't~'i} Town of Nantucket Conservation Commission (508) 228-7230 6 Chestnut Street Nantucket, Massachusetts 02554 Meeting Minutes September 28, 1989 Page 11 Present for the applicant was Melissa Philbrick Mr. Willet reads the inspection report, which notes that the existing house is 62 feet from the bank. The addition is proposed to be at the side of the house, no closer to the bank and no higher than the existing house. Recommendation of a Negative Determination. MOTION: To issue a Negative Determination commenting that the work is within the buffer zone of a coastal bank but will not alter was made and seconded. UNANIMOUS 2. EXTENSION PERMITS a. Town of Nantucket b. Town of Nantucket Surfside Treatment Plant Siasconset Treatment Plant Mr. McKelway reads the letter from Norman Lanman, project manager for the Town, asking that due to the length of time needed to construct the project, the extension be for two years. MOTION: To issue the extension permits for both applications and waive the one-year termination and allow two year extension for both Orders was made and seconded. UNANIMOUS c. Heintz/Wolff - 29 Hinkley Lane - SE48-374 (30-22.1) Present were David Wolff, applicant, and Mark Avery of Design Associates. Mr. Willet reads the inspection report, which notes that the request for extension was made in a timely manner but no construction has begun. The house will be 30 feet from a steep coastal bank. The inspector suggests that the house is closer "'ta'1~t~CCE'JI."'J ~"~~TV C,;.:.~~.. ,.... <t ~--...<; "..to. ~ "':.F .....-s.~ ,~~.. ... ~ ig ~!, ",-'" ~,~ ~ ., ._~.,.:" -. .. o. .{;;i^",',>::,:;"~'" _ .IJI ~ r:\~~~}~i ...~... ~-,,-~,....,=-- l" :: ~C'.....~~ ....;,..'Os- J'<.~OI'iJ:;""~':"~~'O' ..# ...~ ORAl" \~\ ll'a:QaaW"" Town of Nantucket Conservation Commission (508) 228- 7230 6 Chestnut Street Nantucket, Massachusetts 02554 Meeting Minutes September 28, 1989 Page 12 than present regulations allow and that the house will be big and stand out in the area. Mr. Dunn asks why construction has not commenced. Mr. Avery responds that the property changed hands last year and the new owner has not been able to agree on the design of the new house as of yet. The viewing platforms are to get a view from the house as designed. Mr. Dunwiddie comments that the three-year time limit on Orders of Conditions allows for review by the Commission when the time runs out. The regulations have changed and the applicant should make changes to meet the new regulations. Mr. Willet adds that the Commission has been granting the one-year extensions. MOTION: To issue the extension for one year was made and seconded. So voted, with Mr. Dunwiddie opposed d. Wells - Low Beach Road - SE48-369 (74-55) Present was Melissa Philbrick, counsel for the present owner, Mr. Teasdale. Mr. McKelway comments that this request was made the day the Order of Conditions expired. The regulations require that the request be made at least 30 days beforehand. Mrs. Philbrick comments that the 30-day period allows the Commission time to consider the extension before the conditions expire. The applicant came to the Commission in August of 1988 with the plan changes that he had designed, and these were approved as a minor modification. The construction has been tied up by approvals from other Town boards (i.e. the Zoning Board of Appeals). MOTION: To issue a one-year extension for the project was made and seconded. ~~'tI~;ftlll, ....~~llTIJCJr;'~.. I' (>r~$ ~~ o1:',:e.. ...-s. _ ~3::!, ,.... \~~ f'O'~~'IJI: tt:\~~~i.. : ~ ~~~~~.~~:.! ~",... ~~-=--.'~~ ~1-...:... -?!-='~. - ..''0 ~ (~...o.... -- ...." " ~~ I( p.........;., '0' ..~ .:It.'.' ORAi... ,...... -IlIU1;n-al- Town of Nantucket Conservation Commission (508) 228- 7230 6 Chestnut Street Nantucket, Massachusetts 02554 Meeting Minutes September 28, 1989 Page 13 So voted with Mr. Dunwiddie opposed. " ..::' . CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE a. Airport Commission - SE48-349 - Fuel Pipeline Present for the Commission was Jo-ann Norris, Airport Manager. Mr. Willet reads the request letter from Joseph Forns, agent for the Airport Commission. Ms. Lynn Zimmerman of the Nantucket Land Council comments that notification was not given to interested parties at the first unloading and she would like to be notified of the next unloading and suggests that the Commission have a representative at the unloading, also. Ms. Norris states that the pipeline was designed four years ago to handle a smaller barge, but a much larger barge was used this first time. There was not enough water for this barge, and we will use the smaller barge the next time. Mr. C. S. Lovelace a Monomoy Resident comments that there has never been 12 feet of water in that area. The Airport Commission should have known that dredging of the channel would have been required all along. I remember walking across to Town on those marshlands a few years ago. All that I have done is to give half the creeks and access to the harbor in Monomoy to the Town and its people. The Town has entered into a dangerous situation. Even with this temporary pipeline for three years there will be a spill. There are 6,000 spills per year in this country, only 22 of them are greater 100,000 gallons, two thirds come from barges and almost all are due to human error. The pipe itself is made up of three-inch pipe with 38 welds and no catch basin. The barge is supposed to tie up to six pilings while unloading. The Conservation Commission, Fire and Police Departments, Land Council, and other interested groups should .<d,\t~t"~:4 .P'~~TUCI1:'~" .fI....~'< ~-"" eo);.,,~ ~~V -":;.1-~ i5f:!~'1. ..; \~~ nO: '. _:1JI2 :...._. ._ ;:;!i.. - :....~,-~. .. ti.\~~~i~! ",-,,' ~""~ ...... \~... ~~=:,,"~l ",",'0". ... '" ~ "..... 19~........;" Ii)' .... "~;,raRA1~ ,...... ww.q1.:l1U::"'''~' Town of Nantucket Conservation Commission (508) 228- 7230 6 Chestnut Street Nantucket, Massachusetts 02554 Meeting Minutes September 28, 1989 Page 14 be notified and allowed to supervise the unloading of the barges. We need to be sure that the pipeline holds up and that the creeks are protected. The creeks and salt marsh are what feed the community. Finally, I want the Commission to understand that the pipeline will be there for more than three yeal-s. Mrs. Norris responds that the Airport Commission wants a permanent off-loading area. The Coast Guard requested that the flanges be designed as they are. Without fuel the Airport will loose its certification. Mr. Visco asks if the Coast Guard has approved the operational manuals and if they are in place? Mrs. Norris responds that the Coast Guard has reviewed and approved the manuals. After the first unloading, they made some additional suggestions on the operations. There are no plans to dredge the area due to the removal of Army Corps of Engineers funds and the temporary nature of the pipeline. Mr. Dunwiddie asks what safety measures are in place. Mrs. Norris states that accident procedures have been run through as part of the training process. The fire and Police departments along with the oil spill team were involved. Ms. Zimmerman comments that she advocates the retention boom be in place at every unloading. The closeness of the area to the creeks, which is a nursery for marine animals, should make it mandatory that it be put in place. I cannot imagine that the Coast Guard would not want it deployed. Mr. Lovelace adds that oil booms are in place at transfer areas allover the country. Mrs. Norris responds that the Coast Guard feels that deployment would lead to complacency of the personnel handling the fuel transfer, Ms. Zimmerman states that the entire process of this pipeline has been very difficult for the Land Council. The ,.,~,'t~!,ZCt3J:JI. '?':;,I\~TUClr'!"",~ ,~'f ~ ~.......... <:.>- ~ .:it ()/ .....1- 'S ~~. .. .. :t.N1 . \~~ g"o:~,' -,"'--.'.. A ~IJI" ....""~~~t.... ;& t-;~-s.,_~~~~:. :; ~ . ~__ -.c ,- - -~'." .... .~~~~~: :: If """... ~...i.;-~~ - :....."" -:, ~.. -....--r; -:..-~.:::- l^- ~ ~~ Ct.....~- .....~ro ~ ,,~O~p......... \l. ...:' #.'>.'.' ORAit.. ~,,,\... ....,~:&:II'''' Town of Nantucket Conservation Commission (508) 228- 7230 6 Chestnut Street Nantucket, Massachusetts 02554 Meeting Minutes September 28, 1989 Page 15 Airport's consultant has been very difficult to work with for the whole process. The Commission needs to maintain the right to review the project, as allowed by the Order of Conditions. The Commission needs to protect the interests of the Wetlands Act. If this structure were to become permanent, it would lead to closing of the creeks and dredging of the unloading area. There needs to be an continuing objective review of the project. Mr. Borchert asks what the Airport Commission is doing about searching for a permanent site to offload? Mrs. Norris responds that the Commission cannot start looking for a permanent site until they have received the Certificate of Compliance from this Commission. Mr. McKelway adds that the quarterly inspections could be placed in the Certificate of Compliance and be made ongoing. Mr. Borchert asks that the letter from the Coast Guard concerning the deployment of the oil boom be submitted to the Commission. Mr. Visco adds that it should explain the reasoning behind their recommendation for not deploying the boom at every unloading. Mrs. Norris responded that the Coast Guard was worried about the improper placement of the boom due to varying winds and tides. Mr. Lovelace states that when the barge comes in to unload, you will know the wind direction and the tidal flow. Mrs. Sue Mathews, a Monomoy resident, asks why the Commission cannot go to the extreme in this case. The harbor is so important to the island and needs to be protected. Mr. Wasierski comments that the fuels being handled here are volatile and may disperse more quickly if they are not contained. ~t~ec::~:~tJ dl': "~iUC',,,,"~'I: ~..~" ~.~-,.,~~ /. ~/" -";;'\1>-\ it!, ,'", \~~ 1': O' ~. ,.~~,' s~ {1..n:il ~ :.:"'~ if.:/~~r: '-/>- = to-. -, '" .,~_ ,,~~r.ift., .' ~ \ :-\~~~ i'::l 't."'" ~~~=- p\. ~ ..~"(."\.....~~--.::'-- ......~ro # ..~O~p'........;,\). :to" "~;T GRAil:. ,...... -..:q4:t~tn"",9 Town of Nantucket Conservation Commission (508) 228- 7230 6 Chestnut Street Nantucket. Massachusetts 02554 Meeting Minutes September 28, 1989 Page 16 Mr. Visco asks what the operation manual says about deployment. Mrs. Norris responds that it states that the boom should be immediately available in case of a spill. Mr. Borchert asks if the offloading was observed by the Captain of the Port. Mrs. Norris states that the letter is in her office. He had made some recommendation concerning denying access underneath the pipeline. This may be accomplished by placing some pilings on shore and by wrapping plastic snow fence material around the pipe on the seaward end. Ms. Zimmerman states that this is the frustrating part of the whole project. The Airport Commission and their consultant are planning additional work in a resource area that they have not filed for; they have no approval to do it and are not planning to come to the Commission for permission. Mr. Glen Wills comments that there are two kind of booms containment and absorbent. The containment type are not expensive and do not require replacement after one use. MOTION: To continue the hearing for more information and plans was made and seconded. UNANIMOUS b. Taylor - 61 Hulbert Avenue - SE48-397 (29-10) Mr. McKelway states that the submission was still lacking a statement and signature of an engineer or surveyor as required. The Commissioners decided to put off the matter until the next meeting, since the request was incomplete. c. Elliot - Elliot's Way - SE48-361 (92.4-319) Mr. McKelway states that this request was received by the office today and that he had not had time to inspect the property. -",-,'tttCI8llIl, ~~'~~TUCJr. 'I'", ~.. r~ ---':"~)-~<6. t)' () .... A 'Q ~~. "7~ :!~!1 '....... A\~~ ;:Ot _ ~.~~:Uli l:~..", ~4"'4"_ ~.\~_ ~i~! 't,,,..... -.-~- '- .,.,..;~ 'f.1o.... ~~=- .u... ~ ..~ C'.....~......i...ro ~ ......O~^..........,~. '"~ "'b,'''ORAi.. ~..,'Ii ""d::l'-UlS",..t Town of Nantucket Conservation Commission (508) 228-7230 6 Chestnut Street Nantucket, Massachusetts 02554 Meeting Minutes September 28, 1989 Page 17 MOTION: To continue for an inspection was made and seconded. UNANIMOUS 4. ORDER OF CONDITIONS a. Swift - 7 Old Quidnet Milk Route - SE48-564 - (20-54.3) Mrs. Philbrick comments that the draft special conditions prohibit grading of the driveway. Presently there is a bump at the edge of tar road. My client would like to scrape the bump down in order to be able to drive in. In addition, the location of the driveway may call for the removal of a couple trees also not allowed to be cut under the draft conditions. I would like to suggest amending the draft by changing conditions 14 and striking condition 15. After some discussion, the Commission accepted changes to these two conditions. Mrs. Philbrick asks if the siltation fence needs to parallel the wetland boundary as far as the house site. She said that whether or not the wording of the Order is changed, her client wanted some indication from the committee as to how strictly Special Condition #3 would be enforced. Mr. Dunwiddie responds that he feels a siltation fence along the driveway where it goes near the swamp is sufficient. After some more discussion Jeff Blackwell, surveyor for the applicant, draws and initials the plans showing the location of the siltation fence along the driveway. MOTION: To issue the Order of Conditions as amended from the draft was made and seconded. UNANIMOUS ADDITIONAL SPECIAL CONDITIONS 'It.'~~;~~'~tl. ..:~~"TUCJ(~"""', ,.<';. r'" ...-..... )- ""'.&. ;T. () ..... A'" ~~ ..-..,\ ::~!, \~': EO: _:lJIi ~ .....i~. ~i. = ta . \ ") -""'~ ; ~! ~-'...- ~.~~ ~1-...:... ~~"'"""'O ~ -:.. '"0.... _.or_ .... '\: ~ "'6.' ~^.......... ~. ~.. '"l'~ rORAit ~..\'li -""~I"'''' Town of Nantucket Conservation Commission (508) 228- 7230 6 Chestnut Street Nantucket, Massachusetts 02554 Meeting Minutes September 28, 1989 Page 18 STEPHEN R. SWIFT DEQE FILE NUMBER SE48 - 564 ASSESSOR'S MAP 20, PARCEL 54.3 7 OLD QUIDNET MILK ROUTE UNDER THE MASSACHUSETTS WETLANDS PROTECTION ACT ( MGL CHAPTER 131, SECTION 40 ) AND THE WETLANDS BYLAW OF THE TOWN OF NANTUCKET ( CHAPTER 136 ) 3. Prior to any activity at the site, a staked siltation fence or a line of staked haybales shall be installed parallel to the upland edge of the established wetland boundary at the highest elevation practical. After the fence or haybales are installed, notice shall be given to the Nantucket Conservation Commission. No work shall begin on the site for 48 hours after said notice is given, so as to allow Commission members time to inspect all siltation devices. The siltation fence or haybale line, erected to prevent siltation of the wetland during construction, will also serve as a limit of activity for work crews. It shall remain in good repair during all phases of construction, and it shall not be removed until all soils are stabilized and revegetated or until permission to remove it is given by the Commission. 4. An as-built plan, signed and stamped by a registered professional engineer or land surveyor in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, shall be submitted to the Commission at the same time as a written request for a Certificate of Compliance and shall specify how, if at all, the completed plan differs from that shown on the plans referred to in the Order of Conditions. The as-built shall include, but not be limited to, the following: all pipe/culvert inverts for inflow and outfalls; pipe slope, size and composition; location of other drainage structures and their composition; limits of fill or alteration; location of all structures and pavement within 100 feet of wetland; the edge of the wetland; the grade contours within 100 feet of the wetland. 5. Members, employees, and agents of the Commission shall have the right to enter and inspect the premises to evaluate compliance with the conditions and performance standards t'Io\'~:;J~t. .:.1' . "TUc,.J..,,~ ,':!ip--"'\f- .,"... if,!:'o", '" ~.. '\' "",.tttt.. ~"1 () .....1-....-:. :Ii~. ....".. ~~!~ . \'UI':. ~ 0:. ,~...d~ llJl! ~t-:..._, ~:. .., \ .. ')~ _f~. . ... ,. .~ .~---"~. ... ,.,.\ ~~i..~ ........;: '\~ ;1 ". ---~ '-~=- lA.. ~ 't.v(\.....~. .....~o I .,~O~p.........t\). ~~ ~" OR/>.l ",.... '<q""u:~"" Town of Nantucket Conservation Commission (508) 228- 7230 6 Chestnut Street Nantucket, Massachusetts 02554 Meeting Minutes Sep~ember 28, 1989 Page 19 st2ted in this Order and the Nantucket Wetlands Bylaw and the Regulations promulgated under the Bylaw, and may require the submittal of any data deemed necessary by the Commission for that evaluation. 6. The applicant, owners, successors or assignees shall be responsible for maintaining all on-site drainage structures and outfalls, assuring the lasting integrity of vegetative cover on the site and monitoring site activities so as to prevent erosion, siltation, sedimentation, chemical contamination or other detrimental impact to the on-site wetland and/or off-site resource areas. It shall be the responsibility of the property owner of record to see that the maintenance conditions are complied with as required by this order. 7. This document shall be included in all construction contracts and subcontracts dealing with the work proposed and shall supersede other contract requirements. 8. Used petroleum products from the maintenance of construction equipment, construction debris, and unused paint and paint- related products shall be collected and disposed of responsibly off the site. No on-site disposal of these items is allowed. 9. Dust control, if required, shall be limited to water. No salts or other wetting agents shall be used. 10. Any refuse material found on the site shall be disposed of at an approved landfill and in no case will these materials be buried or disposed of in or near a wetland. 11. This Order of Conditions shall apply to any successor in interest or successor in control of the property. 12. Natural vegetation between the wetland edge and the project site will be left intact except where it is necessary to temporarily use this area. After construction, any disturbed area within this buffer area shall be replanted with native plants. There must be a 25-foot undisturbed buffer zone on \,\\U~:U~:1. ~,".~~~TUCI/'"'''' ,t'" '< ~......-..t>- ~~ ~y~~/ ..~:S- ~ tJ .::/1 '.. \~ ': l'fO:~'.,'.<~ A 'IJI~ ... . ~~,.... - Qt-i~~~~~i. :; t:.~~~~;:! '\:0 "".-.. ~~~~::...- ..~ i 1,:.1-...:.. -'?-~- ..'~ ~ ~ ..'0.... -- .... '" ~ "ll._' '/'th.......... \). \l~ "b;,rORAit. ....... """&.c:,.;uu~' Town of Nantucket Conservation Commission (508) 228- 7230 6 Chestnut Street Nantucket. Massachusetts 02554 Meeting Minutes September 28, 1989 Page 20 the upland side of the wetland boundary, except for sections of the driveway (see final approved plan and waiver, below). 13. The driveway must follow the final approved plan so that its northern end will be higher than the path originally brushcut. 14. Except for small areas on either side of the bridge and the berm near the paved road, there shall be no grading or filling of the driveway, and no impervious materials shall be deposited on the driveway. 15. No trees shall be cut, except those within the path of the approved, relocated driveway. 16. There shall be no dredging or clearing or draining of the stl-eam or swamp. 17. Utility lines to be buried under the driveway must cross beneath the bed of the stream. This work is to be done during the dry season. 18. Prior to construction of the bridge and the installation of utility lines, siltation curtains shall be installed immediately downstream from the construction area to contain siltation. Disturbed portions of the bank will be revegetated to maintain the physical stability of the bank. 19. Because of possible adverse effects on wildlife, no pesticide shall ever be used anywhere beyond 15 feet from the house. UNDER THE NANTUCKET WETLANDS BYLAW ONLY: The Commission hereby grants the applicant a waiver from Sections 3.01(B)(3), 3.02(8)(1), and 3.03(8)(2) of the Wetlands Protection Regulations of the Town of Nantucket, under the Nantucket Wetlands Bylaw (Chapter 136). Respectively, these sections require a 25-foot natural undisturbed area adjacent to and pl-ohibit non-water-dependent structures within 50 feet of an inland bank, a vegetated wetland, and an inland water body. In """;~'ClIlIl ~ ~TUC '" ~..~~ ~-...!!:.e-:~~ .{i.... r,V ....:, -:s- '\ :: ~/' . '"P ~ :?-.' \CJI- !~:~, -ilJl! i. iw.:.~ ~:.. .. ~ ~~_~~ :".5 ~~.. ~~- ..';'" ~ ~ "..... ~'......,,'O .:' '1.._0.-9:.:....,....~. ,~ v"'"'rORAi\......... .......1111 ~a I"~ Town of Nantucket Conservation Commission (508) 228-7230 6 Chestnut Street Nantucket, Massachusetts 02554 Meeting Minutes September 28, 1989 Page 21 this case, the proposed driveway bridge will cross a stream through a vegetated wetland, retaining walls will be at or adjacent to the bank of the stream, and the driveway will be closer than 25 feet to the vegetated wetland at other points as well. However, the above-referenced regulations are waived because the applicant has made a clear and convincing showing that there are no reasonable conditions or alternatives that would allow the project to proceed in compliance with the regulations and that the proposed project will not have any adverse effect upon any of the interests protected by the Bylaw. Therefore, a waiver is granted under the authority of Section 1.03(F)(1)(a) of the Wetlands Protection Regulations of the Town of Nantucket. ### 4. OTHER BUSINESS a. Charles Gifford - SE48-526 (43-180) Mr. McKelway explains that a misunderstanding between the contractor and the Commission on the erection of the siltation fence has been cleared up, at least over the telephone with contractor Bruce Killen. He showed the Commissioners photographs of the sections of fence that were improperly installed. He said he will inspect the site again soon. No action was taken. b. Petrucci/Bixler - SE48-524 - Minor Modification Present for the applicant were Melissa Philbrick counsel and John Shugrue engineer. Mrs. Philbrick reviews the old information and submits a new plan of the house, which will have a solid foundation. The issues on the movement of the house have been cleared up but the appearance seems to be in question. &~lt~~:::S~l'l" ^;~~. l1 T U C "ot"" .,~~,< ~......!f.e-)- 't~. .f'. f:>,r ..... ...;IfI~ :::~. "~7' .... ::~!, . .., \~~ ~o: ,2';?- A_:IJI':l -- ~~~~;.... t-..,,,, '~~"" ~. \~_-=:- -~~!~! 'i .".-. ::-c;:.:-,-=-~ - .,...,;... ~~... ~~=:,,'~J ~ 0'" ." '" ~ ..~ '/?p.........e, 'Q' .... q"..' ORAi... .,....... "'"<lq1q'UG"tl Town of Nantucket Conservation Commission (508) 228-7230 6 Chestnut Street Nantucket, Massachusetts 02554 Meeting Minutes September 28, 1989 Page 22 Mr. Borchert comments that the new house looks like more than a minor modification. Mr. Willet asks if it is all on the same footprint. Mrs. Philbrick responds that it is, and the wetland issues do not change. Mr. Willet comments that the project was portrayed to the Commission as using the same structure and adding on to it. Now you are completely removing the house and building from scratch. Mrs. Philbrick states that the building department will not allow the structure to be moved because the Order of Conditions does not state that it can be moved. The building will go straight out the driveway and do no damage to the trees or wetlands in the area. Mr. Dunwiddie comments that the NOI calls for reconstruction and addition, not moving. Mr. Wasierski states that he must abstain from the discussion because of a possible conflict with his town Job. You are not allowed to move or demolish a house with out a plumbing permit, and they have not asked for one, he explains. Mr. Visco asks what is the difference if they tear it down on the lot and remove it in little pieces or move the house as one piece? MOTION: To consider the removal of the house and construction of a new dwelling on the same footprint as existing a minor modification to the Order of Conditions was made and seconded. In Favor: Opposed Dunn, Visco, Cranston Dunwiddie, Borchert d. Leibenhaut - SE48-553 (41-327) Discussion ~C'~e~::30~'11 !Y"..l ~TUC l.,,,, ....... r~~ ...-!!:t~.", ,.it' () ......,,~ ::f...... '.7'~ :;~I '."'9':. ~ .~1 . ,.~ 4$11: :0: '-",~,.:IJI:l r.1-:s'~"~~~i' 5- ~. .-->';>--"~-~'. . . ~~~!-......;o,",~ : ~"",....~...:::...;;-~.,..:~ ~ 1-.'. ---'"" ~..:~""' /1\ ;: \. (\.....~~-.....",..'O $ ...t.ool;>,............ $. "'~ "'b.......ORAi'C. ,....'Ii -.ql\ll;!z,;t"'" Town of Nantucket Conservation Commission (508) 228- 7230 6 Chestnut Street Nantucket. Massachusetts 02554 Meeting Minutes September 28, 1989 Page 23 Mrs. Philbrick summarizes her letter commenting that the proposed septic system is outside the jurisdiction of the Commission. Members of the Commission agreed, and no action was taken. e. John Gifford - SE48-535 (28-9) Present were Melissa Philbrick, counsel for the property owners, and Lynn Zimmerman, Assistant Director of the Nantucket Land Council. Mr. McKelway states that the changes made in the conservation restriction as a result of input from DeRensis's office leave out the Commission and the Board of Selectmen as the oversight and sign off parties, respectively. The Land Bank Commission has already signed the restriction. The Gifford's want to be sure that the Commission is happy with these changes. Mr. Willet comments that there is an Order of Conditions still in effect and will allow supervision of the project. Ms. Zimmerman adds that if the Land Bank should fail to enforce the restriction the Commission may want to step in and enforce. MOTION: To accept the Conservation Restrictions as changed by Town Counsel was made and seconded UNANIMOUS e. Regulation and Fee changes: After some brief discussion the Commission decided to continue the discussion until the next hearing. f. Package Treatment Plant Seminar MOTION: To send Bruce Perry to this conference on October 26 in Boston. ...-,Um:"l'l ~~~TUCJi:'~", l"~'<!;;-~t""~ J: ~"/ ..1- ~ ::!H~\~': .0: .... _:1JI2 il-i-'" -"S>~~~:. : \. . ,,~ --... .. :: .~------ - ~ : .... ,.,.~ ~..;.:~ "A~~ 1.1-"';... 9-~=-..'~" ~ ~""O... --- ....A.; ~ ...... :/jl".........:, ~. ",'" ~.,.;rORA1... ,..,,'Ii ~",U;;Q,"~ Town of Nantucket Conservation Commission (508) 228- 7230 6 Chestnut Street Nantucket, Massachusetts 02554 Meeting Minutes September 28, 1989 Page 24 UNANIMOUS g. Cattails at Madaket Road Bridges Mr. McKelway states that the Commission had received a letter asking the Commission to improve the conditions near the Madaket Road Bridges. Mort Schlesinger wrote that some cattails should be removed to allow improved fish migration. Mr. Borchert suggested that the Commission look into the ongoing Conditions created during the Massasoit Bridge repair process. Mr. Perry suggests the possibility of discussing the removal with the company planning to do remove cattails in the rest of Long Pond. 6. MINUTES: August 24 and 31; September 14, 1989 Mr. McKelway suggests a clarification of the August 24 minutes to the approval of the Commission and the Commission further approved the Minutes as amended. 7. Bills to be Paid 1. State Bookstore $ 2. Nantucket Postmaster 3. Nantucket Office Products 4. Inquirer and Mirror 48.45 200.00 16.67 31.08 9. Executive Session: MOTION: To adjourn into executive session for the discussion of ongoing litigation was made and seconded. UNANIMOUS at 10:50 PM It was announced that the Commission would not be coming back into open session.