HomeMy WebLinkAboutBicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan_201401291001038477Update of the Nantucket Bicycle &
Pedestrian Master Plan
Submitted to:
Town of Nantucket
Nantucket Planning & Economic
Development Commission
1 East Chestnut Street
Nantucket, MA 02554
December 2005
Submitted by:
GPI Greenman-Pedersen, Inc.
105 Central StreetStoneham, MA 02180781.279.5500www.gpinet.com
GPI Greenman-Pedersen, Inc.
105 CENTRAL STREET ♦ SUITE 301 ♦ STONEHAM, MA 02180 ♦ TELEPHONE: (781) 279-5500 ♦ FACSIMILE: (781) 279-5501
TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM
Update of the Nantucket Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan
1205TM
TABLE OF CONTENTS
INTRODUCTION ...........................................................................................................1
PHASE I – ORDER OF MAGNITUDE COST ESTIMATE..........................................2
PHASE II – PAVEMENT CONDITION RATING........................................................8
MAINTENANCE COSTS...............................................................................................20
TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM
Update of the Nantucket Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan
INTRODUCTION
This Technical Memorandum has been prepared to address two components of the Nantucket
Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan. Phase I of the report address the Order of Magnitude costs
associated with the design and construction of the various bicycle and pedestrian facility
upgrades and/or improvements outlined in the 1994 Nantucket Bicycle and Pedestrian Master
Plan, as well as the Comprehensive Community Plan, Regional Transportation Plan, Mid-Island
Area Plan and the Mid-Island Traffic Study. The proposed modifications are outlined in
Appendix A.
Phase II of this memorandum addresses the Pavement Condition Rating (PCR) of each of the
Town’s existing six (6) bike paths. These paths include:
o Milestone Road
o Surfside Road
o Madaket Road
o Cliff Road
o Polpis Road
o Eel Point Road
The pavement evaluation was completed in accordance with the methodology outlined in the
Pavement Condition Rating System established by the Ohio Department of Transportation. This
methodology establishes a Pavement Condition Rating based on a uniform identification of the
severity and extent of various pavement distresses. The PCR provides an index and ranking
reflecting the composite effects of different distress types, severity and extent upon the overall
condition of the pavement.
Appendix B contains the Pavement Condition Rating Procedures used for this study.
TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM
Update of the Nantucket Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan
PHASE I – ORDER OF MAGNITUDE COST ESTIMATE
The costs associated with the various bicycle and pedestrian improvements and construction
projects identified in previous studies was updated to provide the Town with an order of
magnitude cost for the design and construction of each project.
The prices used to update the costs are based on Greenman-Pedersen, Inc.’s past project history
on bike path construction bid prices as well as the bid prices on the two recent bike path projects
on the island (Old South Road and Fairgrounds Road). The costs have been factored to provide
a base construction cost per square foot of bike path, sidewalk, travel lane, etc. The engineering
or design cost associated with each project is also provided. This is based on an engineering fee
equal to approximately eleven percent (11%) of the construction cost.
The costs associated with routine maintenance and/or areas of repair of the existing bike path
facilities will be identified and outlined under Phase II of the project.
The following tables outline the associated engineering and estimated construction costs for each
project outlined in the 1994 Nantucket Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan, as well as the
Comprehensive Community Plan, Regional Transportation Plan, Mid-Island Area Plan and the
Mid-Island Traffic Study.
Table 1Order of MagnitudeCost EstimateNantucket Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan1.0 Surfside Road Length Width Unit Cost Design Construction1.1 Surfside RoadMaterial (ft) (ft) (sf) Cost Cost1.1.1 On west side of road, beginning near First Way, widen existing 6-foot wide Asphalt 600 4 25.00$ 6,600.00$ 60,000.00$ asphalt path by 4-feet for a distance of 600 feet to the north. 1.1.2 Install crosswalk at this location to connect to east side of road Thermo 30 2 7.00$ 46.20$ 420.00$ between two driveways to the High School. # of signs sf 1.1.3 Install Bicycle Crossing Sign (W11-1) 250 feet south of crossing on east Alum 1 16 18.00$ 31.68$ 288.00$ side of road. 1.1.4 Widen existing 3-foot wide concrete sidewalk by 5 feet for a distance of Concrete 250 5 26.00$ 3,575.00$ 32,500.00$ 250 feet to the north. 1.1.5 Construct a bicycle path connecting Surfside Road and Sparks Avenue Asphalt 200 10 25.00$ 5,500.00$ 50,000.00$ at southeastern part of intersection for a distance of 200 feet. SURFSIDE ROAD TOTAL DESIGN COST: 15,752.88$ SURFSIDE ROAD TOTAL MAGNITUDE OF COST: 143,208.00$ 2. Pleasant Street (Option A) Convert the existing two-way traffic pattern on Pleasant St. to a one-way traffic patter in the westbound direction between Sparks Ave and the Five Corners intersection. Length Width Unit Design Construction2.1.A Pleasant Street between Sparks Ave and West Creek Ro (approx. 190 ft) Material (ft) (ft) Cost Cost Cost2.1.1.A Provide 12-foot wide one-way travel lane on Pleasant Street Asphalt Rd 190 12 35.00$ 8,778.00$ 79,800.00$ 2.1.2.A Construct an 8-foot wide brick sidewalk with granite curbing on both sides of Brick 190 16 27.00$ 9,028.80$ 82,080.00$ Pleasant Street 2.2.A Pleasant Street between West Creek Road and Daves Street (approx. 425 ft) 2.2.1.A Provide an 8-foot wide parallel parking lane along the south side of Asphalt 425 8 25.00$ 9,350.00$ 85,000.00$ Pleasant Street 2.2.2.A Provide a 10-foot wide one-way travel lane Asphalt Rd 425 10 35.00$ 16,362.50$ 148,750.00$ 2.2.3.A Provide a 16-foot wide angle parking lane Asphalt Rd 425 16 35.00$ 26,180.00$ 238,000.00$ 2.2.4.A Construct a 6-foot wide cobblestone lane on Pleasant St between the angle Cobble 425 6 28.00$ 7,854.00$ 71,400.00$ parking lane and the one-way travel lane 2.2.5.A Construct an 8-foot wide brick sidewalk with granite curbing on both sides of Brick 425 16 27.00$ 20,196.00$ 183,600.00$ Pleasant Street 2.3.A Pleasant Street between Daves Street and Cherry Street (approx. 1,300 ft) 2.3.1.A Provide an 8-foot wide parallel parking lane along both sides of Pleasant St Asphalt Rd 1300 16 35.00$ 80,080.00$ 728,000.00$ 2.3.2.A Provide a 10-foot wide one-way travel lane Asphalt Rd 1300 10 35.00$ 50,050.00$ 455,000.00$ 2.3.3.A Construct an 8-foot brick sidewalk with granite curbing on both sides of Brick 1300 16 27.00$ 61,776.00$ 561,600.00$ Pleasant Street 2.4.A Pleasant Street between Williams Street and Garder Perry Lane (approx. 520 ft) 2.4.1.A Provide 11-foot one-way travel lane Asphalt Rd 520 11 35.00$ 22,022.00$ 200,200.00$ 2.4.2.A Construct an 8-foot brick sidewalk with granite curbing on both sides of Brick 520 16 27.00$ 24,710.40$ 224,640.00$ Pleasant Street 2.5.A Pleasant Street between Gardner Perry Lane and Atlantic Ave (approx. 500 ft) 2.5.1.A Provide and 8-foot wide parallel parking lane on south side of Pleasant Street Asphalt Rd 500 8 35.00$ 15,400.00$ 140,000.00$ 2.5.2.A Provide a 10-foot wide one-way travel lane Asphalt Rd 500 10 35.00$ 19,250.00$ 175,000.00$ Construct a 5-8 foot wide brick sidewalk with granite curbing on both sides of Brick 500 8 27.00$ 11,880.00$ 108,000.00$ Pleasant Street PLEASANT STREET OPTION A TOTAL DESIGN COST: 382,917.70$ PLEASANT STREET OPTION A TOTAL MAGNITUDE OF COST: 3,481,070.00$ GPIPage 1 of 8
Table 1Order of MagnitudeCost EstimateNantucket Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan (Option B) Preserve existing traffic pattern along Pleasant Street and ancillary streets. Length Width Unit Design Construction2.1.B Pleasant Street between Sparks Ave and West Creek Ro (approx. 190 ft) Material (ft) (ft) Cost Cost Cost2.1.1.B Construct an 8-foot wide brick sidewalk with granite curbing on both sides of Brick 190 16 27.00$ 9,028.80$ 82,080.00$ Pleasant Street 2.1.2.B Provide two 10-foot wide two-way travel lanes Asphalt Rd 190 20 35.00$ 14,630.00$ 133,000.00$ 2.2.B Pleasant Street between West Creek Road and Daves Street (approx. 425 ft) 2.2.1.B Provide an 8-foot wide parallel parking lane along both sides of Asphalt Rd 425 16 35.00$ 26,180.00$ 238,000.00$ Pleasant Street 2.2.2.B Provide two 10-foot wide two-way travel lanes Asphalt Rd 425 20 35.00$ 32,725.00$ 297,500.00$ 2.2.3.B Construct an 8-foot wide brick sidewalk with granite curbing on both sides of Brick 425 16 27.00$ 20,196.00$ 183,600.00$ Pleasant Street 2.3.B Pleasant Street between Daves Street and Cherry Street (approx. 1,300 ft) 2.3.1.B Provide an 8-foot wide parallel parking lane along both sides of Pleasant St Asphalt Rd 1300 16 35.00$ 80,080.00$ 728,000.00$ 2.3.2.B Provide two 10-foot wide two-way travel lanes Asphalt Rd 1300 20 35.00$ 100,100.00$ 910,000.00$ 2.3.3.B Construct an 8-foot brick sidewalk with granite curbing on both sides of Brick 1300 16 27.00$ 61,776.00$ 561,600.00$ Pleasant Street 2.4.B Pleasant Street between Williams Street and Five Corners (approx.1020 ft) 2.4.1.B Construct a 5-8 foot wide brick sidewalk with granite curbing on both sides of Asphalt 1020 18 25.00$ 50,490.00$ 459,000.00$ Pleasant StreetBrick 1020 20 27.00$ 60,588.00$ 550,800.00$ 2.4.2.B Provide two 10-foot wide two-way travel lanes Asphalt Rd 35.00$ PLEASANT STREET OPTION B TOTAL DESIGN COST: 455,793.80$ PLEASANT STREET OPTION B TOTAL MAGNITUDE OF COST: 4,143,580.00$ Length Width Unit Design ConstructionMaterial (ft) (ft) Cost Cost Cost3.0 Nantucket Cottage Hospital: Prospect Street to Vesper Lane Option A 3.1.A Construct a 10-foot wide bicycle path, 1,080 ft long, connecting Prospect St Asphalt 1080 10 25.00$ 29,700.00$ 270,000.00$ and Vesper Lane along a portion of Chicken Hill and N. Mill Street Option B 3.1.B Construct a 10-foot wide bicycle path, 865 ft long, connecting Prospect St Asphalt 865 10 25.00$ 23,787.50$ 216,250.00$ and Vesper Lane along a portion of the Hospital Property Option C 3.1.C Construct a 10-foot bicycle path, 360 ft long, connecting Prospect St Asphalt 360 10 25.00$ 9,900.00$ 90,000.00$ and Vesper Lane along the eastern portion of the Hospital property, and along the western portion of the Hospital Property Length Width Unit Design Construction4.0.A Sparks Avenue (Option A) Combination 5-foot and 8 to 10-foot sidewalks Material (ft) (ft) Cost Cost Cost4.1.A Sparks Ave between Milestone Rotary and Pleasant St. Roundabout 4.1.1.A Construct 5 ft wide brick sidewalk with granite curbing along the north Brick 450 5 27.00$ 6,682.50$ 60,750.00$ side of Sparks Ave. A 3 ft grass strip should be provided to separate the Grass 450 3 6.00$ 891.00$ 8,100.00$ travel lane and sidewalk where possible. 4.1.2.A Construct 8 to 10 ft asphalt sidewalk with asphalt curbing along the south Asphalt 450 10 25.00$ 12,375.00$ 112,500.00$ side of Sparks Ave. 4.2.A Sparks Ave between Pleasant St. Roundabout and Williams Ln 4.2.1.A Construct 5 ft wide brick sidewalk with granite curbing along the north Asphalt 2300 5 25.00$ 31,625.00$ 287,500.00$ side of Sparks Ave. A 3 ft grass strip should be provided to separate the Grass 2300 3 6.00$ 4,554.00$ 41,400.00$ travel lane and sidewalk where possible. 4.2.2.A Construct 8 to 10 ft asphalt sidewalk with asphalt curbing along the south Asphalt 2300 10 25.00$ 63,250.00$ 575,000.00$ side of Sparks Ave. SPARKS AVENUE OPTION A TOTAL DESIGN COST: 119,377.50$ SPARKS AVENUE OPTION A TOTAL MAGNITUDE OF COST: 1,085,250.00$ OPTION A COSTSOPTION B COSTSOPTION C COSTSGPIPage 2 of 8
Table 1Order of MagnitudeCost EstimateNantucket Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan 4.0.B Sparks Avenue (Option B) Combination 5-foot sidewalks and 4-foot bike lanes Length Width Unit Design Construction4.1.B Sparks Ave between Milestone Rotary and Pleasant St. Roundabout Material (ft) (ft) Cost Cost Cost4.1.1.B Construct 5 ft wide brick sidewalk with granite curbing along the north Brick 450 5 27.00$ 6,682.50$ 60,750.00$ side of Sparks Ave. A 3 ft grass strip should be provided to separate the Grass 450 3 6.00$ 891.00$ 8,100.00$ travel lane and sidewalk where possible. 4.1.2.B Construct 5 ft wide asphalt sidewalk with asphalt curbing along south side Asphalt 450 5 25.00$ 6,187.50$ 56,250.00$ of Sparks Ave 4.1.2.B Provide a 4 ft wide bicycle lane on both sides of Sparks Ave. between the Asphalt 450 8 25.00$ 9,900.00$ 90,000.00$ travel lane and the sidewalk 4.2.B Sparks Ave between Pleasant St. Roundabout and Williams Ln 4.2.1.B Construct 5 ft wide brick sidewalk with granite curbing along the north Brick 2300 5 27.00$ 34,155.00$ 310,500.00$ side of Sparks Ave. A 3 ft grass strip should be provided to separate the Grass 2300 3 6.00$ 4,554.00$ 41,400.00$ travel lane and sidewalk where possible. and Vesper Lane along a portion of the Hospital Property 4.2.2.B Construct 5 ft wide asphalt sidewalk with asphalt curbing along south side Asphalt 450 5 25.00$ 6,187.50$ 56,250.00$ of Sparks Ave 4.2.3.B Provide a 4-5 ft wide bicycle lane on both sides of Sparks Ave. between the Asphalt 450 10 25.00$ 12,375.00$ 112,500.00$ travel lane and the sidewalk SPARKS AVENUE OPTION B TOTAL DESIGN COST: 80,932.50$ SPARKS AVENUE OPTION B TOTAL MAGNITUDE OF COST: 735,750.00$ 5.0.A Orange Street (Option A) Combination of 5-foot and 8 to 10-foot sidewalks Length Width Unit Design Construction5.1.A Orange StreetMaterial (ft) (ft) Cost Cost Cost5.1.1.A Construct 5 ft wide brick sidewalk with granite curbing on the northeastern Brick 1950 5 27.00$ 28,957.50$ 263,250.00$ side of Orange St between the Milestone Rotary and Bear St. A 3 ft grass Grass 1950 3 6.00$ 3,861.00$ 35,100.00$ strip should be provided to separate the travel lane and sidewalk wherever possible.Asphalt 1950 8 25.00$ 42,900.00$ 390,000.00$ 5.1.2.A Construct an 8 ft wide brick sidewalk with granite curbing on southwestern side of Orange Street between the Milestone Rotary and Bear St 5.2.A Old Railroad Right-of-Way 5.2.1.A Construct bicycle path (material to be determined) along existing berm, Asphalt 800 10 25.00$ 22,000.00$ 200,000.00$ connecting end of Washington St Extension to Orange St at Bear St intersection, a distance of 800 ft (additional easements may be needed) 5.3.A Washington Street Bicycle Route# of signs sf 5.3.1.A Designate Washington St as a class III bicycle route with share-the-road Alum 4 16 18.00$ 126.72$ 1,152.00$ signage between the Old Railroad Right-of-Way to Commercial Street ORANGE STREET OPTION A TOTAL DESIGN COST: 97,845.22$ ORANGE STREET OPTION A TOTAL MAGNITUDE OF COST: 889,502.00$ GPIPage 3 of 8
Table 1Order of MagnitudeCost EstimateNantucket Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan 5.0.B Orange Street (Option B) Combination of 5-ft sidewalks, 4-ft bike lanes and bike route Length Width Unit Design Construction5.1.B Orange StreetMaterial (ft) (ft) Cost Cost Cost5.1.1.B Construct 5 ft wide brick sidewalk with granite curbing on the northeastern Brick 2400 5 27.00$ 35,640.00$ 324,000.00$ side of Orange St between the Milestone Rotary and Bear St. A 3 ft grass Grass 2400 3 6.00$ 4,752.00$ 43,200.00$ strip should be provided to separate the travel lane and sidewalk wherever possible. 5.1.2.B Construct a 5-foot wide brick sidewalk with granite curbing along Brick 1950 5 27.00$ 28,957.50$ 263,250.00$ southwestern side of Orange St between the Milestone Rotary and Union St. Grass 1950 3 6.00$ 3,861.00$ 35,100.00$ A 3 ft grass strip should be provided to separate travel lane and sidewalk where possible. 5.1.3.B Provide a 4-5 ft wide bicycle lane on both sides of Orange St between the Asphalt 2400 10 25.00$ 66,000.00$ 600,000.00$ travel lane and the sidewalk 5.2.B Union Street and Upper Orange Street Bicycle Route 5.2.1.B Construct bicycle path on existing berm, connecting end of Washington St Asphalt 800 10 25.00$ 22,000.00$ 200,000.00$ Extension to Orange St at Bear St intersection, a distance of 800 ft (easements required near Goose Pond Lane, a private road) ORANGE STREET OPTION B TOTAL DESIGN COST: 161,210.50$ ORANGE STREET OPTION B TOTAL MAGNITUDE OF COST: 1,465,550.00$ Length Width Unit Design Construction6.0 Prospect Street and Quaker RoadMaterial (ft) (ft) Cost Cost Cost6.1 Prospect Street between Surfside Rd and W. York Ln 6.1.1 Construct a 5 ft wide brick sidewalk with granite curbing on the southwest brick 250 5 27.00$ 3,712.50$ 33,750.00$ side of Prospect St between Surfside Rd and W. York Ln 6.2 Prospect Street between W. York Ln and 27 Prospect St 6.2.1 Construct a 10 ft wide bicycle path along the southwestern side of asphalt 1500 10 25.00$ 41,250.00$ 375,000.00$ Prospect Street between W. York Ln and 27 Prospect St 6.3 Prospect St between 27 Prospect St and Milk St 6.3.1 Construct a 5 ft wide brick sidewalk with granite curbing on the southwest brick 900 5 27.00$ 13,365.00$ 121,500.00$ side of Prospect St between 27 Prospect St and Milk St 6.4 Quaker Road 6.4.1 Construct an approximately 5 ft wide asphalt sidewalk with granite asphalt 900 5 25.00$ 12,375.00$ 112,500.00$ curbing or multi-use lane with appropriate striping along the western side of Quaker Road between Madaket Road and Milk St PROSPECT STREET AND QUAKER ROAD TOTAL DESIGN COST: 70,702.50$ PROSPECT STREET AND QUAKER ROAD TOTAL MAGNITUDE OF COST:642,750.00$ Length Width Unit Design Construction7.0 Bicycle Improvement: Nobadeer Farm Road to Nantucket Memorial Airport Material (ft) (ft) Cost Cost Cost7.1 Nobadeer Farm Road 7.1.1 Construct a 10 ft wide bicycle path, 960 ft long, along the west side of Nobadeer Farm Road, 50 ft from the right-of-way edge, beginning at the Asphalt 960 10 25.00$ 26,400.00$ 240,000.00$ Milestone Rd bike path 7.2 Nobadeer Farm Road 7.2.1 Construct a 10 ft wide bicycle path between Macys Ln and an area along Asphalt 1500 10 25.00$ 41,250.00$ 375,000.00$ Nobadeer Farm Rd 450 ft north of Sun Island Rd. The bicycle path should be along the western edge of the property abutting the west side of Nobadeer Farm Rd# of lights 7.2.1 Appropriate lighting for safety should be provided Lighting 5 800.00$ 396.00$ 3,600.00$ 7.3 Nobadeer Farm Road 7.3.1 Section A - Priority 7.3.1.1 Construct an 8 ft brick sidewalk with granite curbing along the east side of Brick 1575 8 27.00$ 37,422.00$ 340,200.00$ Nobadeer Farm Rd between Sun Island Rd and Old South Rd 7.3.2 Section B - Secondary 7.3.2.1 Construct an 8 ft brick sidewalk with granite curbing along the west side of Brick 1575 8 27.00$ 37,422.00$ 340,200.00$ Nobadeer Farm Rd between Sun Island Rd and Old South Rd NOBADEER FARM RD TOTAL DESIGN COST: 142,890.00$ NOBADEER FARM RD TOTAL MAGNITUDE OF COST: 1,299,000.00$ GPIPage 4 of 8
Table 1Order of MagnitudeCost EstimateNantucket Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan Length Width Unit Design Construction8.0 Bicycle Improvement: Bartlett Road to Hummock Pond Road (Short-Term) Material (ft) (ft) Cost Cost Cost8.1 Bartlett Road 8.1.1 Where possible, re-connect the existing 6 ft asphalt facility to a 10 ft path Asphalt 2000 10 25.00$ 55,000.00$ 500,000.00$ 8.2 Bartlett Road 8.2.1 Complete connection of Surfside Bicycle Path to Somerset Bicycle Route Asphalt 1200 10 25.00$ 33,000.00$ 300,000.00$ by constructing a 10 ft wide bicycle path along the south side of Bartlett Road in the vicinity of Mizzenmast Road 8.3 Somerset Road/Lane# of signs sf 8.3.1 Designate as a bicycle route connecting Hummock Pond Bicycle Route Alum 4 16 18.00$ 138.24$ 1,152.00$ and Bartlett Bicycle Path BARTLETT ROAD TOTAL DESIGN COST: 88,000.00$ BARTLETT ROAD TOTAL MAGNITUDE OF COST: 800,000.00$ Length Width Unit Design Construction9.0 Hummock Pond Road and Milk StreetMaterial (ft) (ft) Cost Cost Cost9.1 Hummock Pond Road 9.1.1 Construct a 10 ft wide bicycle path along Hummock Pond Rd from the Asphalt 1500 10 25.00$ 41,250.00$ 375,000.00$ intersection of Vesper Ln, Hummock Pond Rd, and Somerset Rd, to the intersection of Hummock Pond Road and Milk St 9.2 Milk StreetAlum 4 16 18.00$ 126.72$ 1,152.00$ 9.2.1 Designate as a bicycle route from Garner St to Hummock Pond Rd 9.3 Hummock Pond Road 9.3.1 Construct a 10 ft wide bicycle path along Hummock Pond Rd between Asphalt 14700 10 25.00$ 404,250.00$ 3,675,000.00$ Milk St and Cisco Beach HUMMOCK POND ROAD TOTAL DESIGN COST: 445,626.72$ HUMMOCK POND ROAD TOTAL MAGNITUDE OF COST: 4,051,152.00$ Length Width Unit Design Construction10.0 Cliff RoadMaterial (ft) (ft) Cost Cost Cost10.1 Cliff Road bicycle path extension 10.1.1 Construct a 10 ft wide bicycle path along the north side of Cliff Rd Asphalt 2500 10 25.00$ 68,750.00$ 625,000.00$ between Crooked Ln and Sherburne Turnpike 10.2 Cliff Road bicycle path extension 10.2.1. Construct a 10 ft wide bicycle path along the north side of Cliff Rd Asphalt 1300 10 25.00$ 35,750.00$ 325,000.00$ between Sherburne Turnpike and N. Liberty St 10.3 Cliff Road bicycle path extension 10.3.1 Provide unobstructed bicycle and pedestrian accommodations between Asphalt 2100 10 25.00$ 57,750.00$ 525,000.00$ N Liberty St and Westchester St CLIFF POND ROAD TOTAL DESIGN COST: 162,250.00$ CLIFF POND ROAD TOTAL MAGNITUDE OF COST: 1,475,000.00$ GPIPage 5 of 8
Table 1Order of MagnitudeCost EstimateNantucket Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan Length Width Unit Design Construction11.0 Madaket Bicycle PathMaterial (ft) (ft) Cost Cost Cost11.1 Series of Reverse Horizontal Curves 1,000-feet west of Millbrook Road 11.1.1 Short Term Plan# of signs sf 11.1.1.1 Install Warning Signs (W1-1)Alum 4 16 18.00$ 126.72$ 1,152.00$ 11.1.1.2 Relocate utility pole and boxN/A N/A N/A 2,500.00$ 275.00$ 2,500.00$ 11.1.1.3 Upgrade split rail fence to conform with AASHTO Guidelines N/A N/A N/A 5,000.00$ 550.00$ 5,000.00$ 11.1.1.4 Study operational characteristics of this section N/A N/A N/A 5,000.00$ 550.00$ 5,000.00$ 11.1.1.15 Comprehensive accident analysis of this section N/A N/A N/A 2,500.00$ 275.00$ 2,500.00$ 11.1.2 Mid Term Plan, if Short Term Plan Fails Widen pavement cross section within the horizontal curves to increase the Asphalt 1880 10 25.00$ 51,700.00$ 470,000.00$ effective width of the path, or 11.1.2.2. Realign/upgrade to improve operating conditions 11.2 Areas of No-Median Separation 11.2.1 Study the feasibility of reconstructing the path where possible to include Grass 5280 4 10.00$ 23,232.00$ 211,200.00$ a 4 ft median separation or installing channelizers at edge of roadway 11.3 Improve Access to the Bicycle Facility Entrance 11.3.1 Install crosswalk across Main Street from Caton Circle to Quaker Road Thermo 30 2 7.00$ 46.20$ 420.00$ 11.3.2 Install crosswalk across Quaker Road linking existing bicycle facility Thermo 30 2 7.00$ 50.40$ 420.00$ with Main Street 11.3.3 Install bicycle crossing signs (W11-1) at all approaches Alum 4 16 18.00$ 138.24$ 1,152.00$ 11.3.4 Widen the entrance throats and provide entering and exiting direction Asphalt 100 10 25.00$ 3,000.00$ 25,000.00$ arrows on the pavement MADAKET BICYCLE PATH TOTAL DESIGN COST: 26,466.84$ MADALET BICYCLE PATH TOTAL MAGNITUDE OF COST: 238,192.00$ Length Width Unit Design Construction12.0 Quidnet RoadMaterial (ft) (ft) Cost Cost Cost12.1 Quidnet Road 12.1.1 Construct bicycle path on the north side of Quidnet Road between Asphalt 6860 10 25.00$ 188,650.00$ 1,715,000.00$ Polpis Road and Squam Road (6,860 ft) QUIDNET ROAD TOTAL DESIGN COST: 188,650.00$ QUIDNET ROAD TOTAL MAGNITUDE OF COST: 1,715,000.00$ Length Width Unit Design Construction13.0 Tom Nevers RoadMaterial (ft) (ft) Cost Cost Cost13.1 Tom Nevers Road 13.1.1 Construct bicycle path on the east side of Tom Nevers Road (7,390 ft) Asphalt 7390 10 25.00$ 203,225.00$ 1,847,500.00$ 13.1.2 Project is considered a low priority 13.2 Tom Nevers Road 13.2.1 Construct bicycle path along Tom Nevers Road between Old Tom Nevers Asphalt 4300 10 25.00$ 129,000.00$ 1,075,000.00$ Road and the Tom Nevers Playing Fields (4,300 ft) 13.2.2 Project is considered a low priority TOM NEVERS ROAD TOTAL DESIGN COST: 332,225.00$ TOM NEVERS ROAD TOTAL MAGNITUDE OF COST: 2,922,500.00$ Length Width Unit Design Construction14.0 Bear Street between Orange Street and Pleasant Street Material (ft) (ft) Cost Cost Cost14.1 Bear Street between Orange Street and Pleasant Street 14.1.1 Reconstruct roadway to provide a one-way travel lane and separated Asphalt 725 10 25.00$ 19,937.50$ 181,250.00$ bicycle path between Pleasant St and Orange St 14.1.2 Install crosswalk on Orange St, connecting Bear St bicycle path to new Thermo 30 2 7.00$ 46.20$ 420.00$ path along old railroad right-of-way# of signs sf 14.1.3 Install Bicycle Crossing sign (W11-1) on both sides of Orange St 250 ft Alum 2 16 18.00$ 63.36$ 576.00$ in advance of crossing 14.1.4 Trim vegetation along Orange St to improve sight distance at crossing N/A N/A N/A 2,500.00$ 300.00$ 2,500.00$ 14.1.5 Project is considered a low priority BEAR STREET TOTAL DESIGN COST: 20,347.06$ GPIPage 6 of 8
Table 1Order of MagnitudeCost EstimateNantucket Bicycle and Pedestrian Master PlanBEAR STREET TOTAL MAGNITUDE OF COST: 184,746.00$ GPIPage 7 of 8
Table 1Order of MagnitudeCost EstimateNantucket Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan Length Width Design Construction15.0 Boys Club PropertyMaterial (ft) (ft) Cost Cost15.1 Boys and Girls Club between Pleasant Street and Sparks Avenue 15.1.1 Construct bicycle path, 400 ft long, connecting Sparks Avenue and Asphalt 350 10 25.00$ 9,625.00$ 87,500.00$ Pleasant St across southeastern edge of Boys Club property (easement req) 15.1.2 Install crosswalk across Pleasant St, Linking proposed bicycle path Thermo 30 2 7.00$ 46.20$ 420.00$ between Boys Club site and Bear St# of signs sf 15.1.3 Install Bicycle Crossing (W11-1) on both sides of Pleasant St 250 ft in Alum 2 16 18.00$ 63.36$ 576.00$ advance of crossing 15.1.4 Project is considered a low priority BOYS CLUB PROPERTY TOTAL DESIGN COST: 9,734.56$ BOYS CLUB PROPERTY TOTAL MAGNITUDE OF COST: 88,496.00$ Length Width Design Construction16.0 Washington Street, Francis Street and Union Street Material (ft) (ft) Cost Cost16.1 Washington Street, Francis Street and Union Street 16.1.1 Upgrade existing sidewalks on Washington St and Francis St and on Union St between Francis St and Orange St 16.1.1.1 Washington StreetAsphalt 1700 5 25.00$ 23,375.00$ 212,500.00$ 16.1.1.2 Francis StreetAsphalt 300 5 25.00$ 4,125.00$ 37,500.00$ 16.1.1.3 Union StreetAsphalt 1300 5 25.00$ 17,875.00$ 162,500.00$ WASHINGTON, FRANCIS AND UNION STREETS TOTAL DESIGN COST: 45,375.00$ WASHINGTON, FRANCIS AND UNION STREETS TOTAL MAGNITUDE OF COST: 412,500.00$ GPIPage 8 of 8
TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM
Update of the Nantucket Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan
PHASE II – PAVEMENT CONDITION RATING
The six existing bike paths in the Town were evaluated using a pavement rating system that was
developed by the Ohio Department of Transportation. The entire length of each path was driven
and any defects in the pavement were noted and located based on the odometer reading. The in-
dividual bike paths were broken down into segments approximately one mile in length. Each
segment was evaluated and a Pavement Condition Rating (PCR) for each segment was calcu-
lated.
Table 2 illustrates the summary PCRs for each bike path. The results of the field investigations
for the individual sections are included in Appendix B.
Existing Conditions
Following is a brief description of the existing conditions of each bike path.
Milestone Road Bike Path
The Milestone Road bike path starts at the intersection of Milestone Road and Old South Road
and continues east along the south side of Milestone Road for approximately 6.4 miles. The path
was originally constructed in 1968 and, according to Town sources, was widened and overlaid in
1998.
The Milestone bike path was divided into eight test sections. Each section was evaluated
separately and the cumulative Pavement Condition Rating was determined for the entire path.
The test was started at the Old South Road end of the path and continued due east. The results
for each test section are included in Appendix C. The overall Pavement Condition Rating for the
Milestone Road Bike Path is 93.4, which corresponds with a Very Good rating.
The following minor deficiencies have been identified by their approximate mileage along each
section.
TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM
Update of the Nantucket Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan
Isolated de-bonding at mile 1.2 Minor Base Failure at mile 0.9
Transverse Crack at mile 2.5 Minor upheaval caused by tree roots at mile 3.5
Minor edge cracking at mile 4.3
TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM
Update of the Nantucket Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan
Recommendations
The Milestone Road Bike Path is in very good condition with an overall PCR of 94.0. While the
pavement should be re-evaluated every five years, the following minor repairs are recommended.
Edge Cracking is present occasionally with low to medium severity. However in test section 1
the edge cracking is extensive. At this time no repairs are recommended to correct the edge
cracking.
Pressure Damage / Upheaval is generally not present with the exception of an isolated location
at mile 3.4. At this time, it is recommended that no repairs are performed and that the location is
re-evaluated in five years.
Transverse Cracks are present occasionally with low to high severity. It is recommended that
the transverse cracks are sawed and sealed. It is estimated that there are approximately 10 cracks
per section that need to be repaired.
Quantity = 10 cracks per section x 8 linear feet per crack x 8 sections =640 LF
Cost = 640 LF x $5.50/LF =$3520.00
Base Failure: is occasionally present with low severity. At this time, it is recommended that no
repairs are performed and that the pavement be re-evaluated in five years.
Surface Disintegration or Debonding is present in an isolated location at approximately mile
1.2. It is recommended that the section of damaged pavement be removed and reconstructed with
full depth pavement.
Quantity = 5 feet x 5 feet = 25 SF
Cost = 25 SF x $4.00/SF = $100.00
TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM
Update of the Nantucket Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan
Surfside Road Bike Path
The Surfside Road Bike Path starts at the intersection of Vesper Lane and Surfside Road and
continues south along Surfside Road for approximately 2.5 miles to Surfside Beach. The path
was constructed in 1977.
The Surfside Road bike path was divided into three test sections. Each section was evaluated
separately and the cumulative Pavement Condition Rating was determined for the entire path.
The test was started at the Vesper Lane end of the path and continued due south. The results for
each test section are included in Appendix D. The overall Pavement Condition Rating for the
Surfside Road Bike Path is 97.8, which corresponds with a Very Good rating.
The following minor deficiencies have been identified by their approximate mileage along each
section.
Minor de-bonding at Miacomet Avenue High severity edge cracking at
intersecting driveway (typical)
Recommendations
The Surfside Road Bike Path is in very good condition with an overall PCR of 97.8. While the
pavement should be re-evaluated every five years, the following minor repairs are recommended.
Raveling is present occasionally with low severity. At this time no repair is required.
Base Failure is present occasionally with low severity. At this time no repair is required.
TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM
Update of the Nantucket Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan
Edge Cracking is present occasionally with low severity. However, at a few intersecting non
paved driveways, the edge cracking could be considered high severity. At this time no repair is
required, however when the path is eventually repaved, the aprons to abutting driveways should
be extended to avoid this problem in the future.
Madaket Road Bike Path
The path starts at the intersection of Madaket Road and Ames Avenue and continues along the
south side of Madaket Road for approximately 5.2 miles. The path was originally constructed in
1987.
The Madaket Road bike path was divided into six test sections. Each section was evaluated
separately and the cumulative Pavement Condition Rating was determined for the entire path.
The test was started at the Ames Avenue end of the path and continued due east. The results for
each test section are included in Appendix E. The overall Pavement Condition Rating for the
Madaket Road Bike Path is 89.6, which corresponds with a Good rating.
The following minor deficiencies have been identified by their approximate mileage along each
section.
Settlement at catch basin mile 0.6 Typical edge cracking at joint
between roadway and bike path
TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM
Update of the Nantucket Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan
High severity upheaval caused by tree roots Base failure along edge mile 3.4
Base failure and possible Utility patch at mile 5.0
retaining wall failure at Long Pond
Recommendations
The Madaket Road Bike Path is in good condition overall with a PCR of 89.6. While the
pavement should be re-evaluated every five years, the following minor repairs are recommended.
Raveling is present occasionally with low severity. At this time no repair is required.
Patching is present at an isolated location at mile 0.3. This utility patch should be repaired with
a full depth patch within the next five years, as it will probably continue to settle.
Quantity = 30 feet long x 12 feet wide = 360 SF
TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM
Update of the Nantucket Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan
Cost = 360 SF x $4.00/SF = $1440.00
Surface Disintegration or Debonding is present occasionally with a low severity. The majority
of the debonding occurs where the bike path pavement is adjacent to the roadway pavement. At
this time no repair is recommended. However, when the bike path is repaved, the roadway
pavement should be sawcut providing for a better joint between the roadway pavement and the
bike path pavement. Another location where minor debonding is occurring is at the entrance to
the DPW yard. At this time, no repair is recommended, but consideration should be given to
increasing the pavement box at this location when the bike path is repaved.
Base Failure is present occasionally with low severity. With the exception of an isolated
location at mile 3.4, no repairs are necessary at this time. The isolated section should be repaired
with full depth pavement.
Quantity = 5 feet long x 8 feet wide = 40 SF
Cost= 40 SF x $4.00/SF = $160.00
Settlements are present occasionally with low severity. Settlement generally occurs adjacent to
the roadway pavement. These areas should be repaired with full depth pavement.
Quantity = 100 feet long x 8 feet wide = 800 SF
Cost= 800 SF x $4.00SF = $3200.00
Transverse Cracks are present occasionally with low to medium severity. It is recommended
that the transverse cracks are sawed and sealed. Assume that there are 10 cracks per section that
need to be repaired.
Quantity = 10 cracks per section x 8 linear feet per crack x 6 sections =480 LF
Cost = 480 LF x $5.50/LF =$2640.00
Edge Cracking is present occasionally with low to medium severity. At this time, no repairs are
recommended.
Pressure Damage / Upheaval is present occasionally with low to high severity. Isolated
locations at mile 2.6 and mile 3.2 to 3.4 should be overlaid.
Quantity = 200 feet long x 8 feet wide = 1600 SF
Cost= 1600 SF x $2.00/SF = $3200.00
In addition to the repairs listed above, the wooden retaining wall at the culvert for Long Pond
appears to be failing. This in turn is causing a base failure along the edge of the path. The wall
TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM
Update of the Nantucket Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan
should be inspected by a structural engineer, with a new wall system designed and installed. The
bike path pavement should be reconstructed at the same time as the retaining wall.
Cliff Road Bike Path
The path starts at the intersection of Madaket Road and Cliff Road and continues along the north
side of Cliff Road for approximately 1.2 miles. The bike path was constructed in 1989.
The Cliff Road bike path was treated as one section. The test was started at the Madaket Road
end of the path and continued due east. The results for the test section is included in Appendix
F. The Pavement Condition Rating for the Cliff Road bike path is 91.3, which corresponds with a
Very Good rating.
The following minor deficiencies have been identified by their approximate mileage along each
section.
Debonding of overlay at Deacon’s Way Minor settlement of utility trench at mile 0.4
Minor base failure at mile 1.1 Utility patch at mile 1.1
TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM
Update of the Nantucket Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan
Recommendations
The Cliff Road Bike Path is in very good condition overall with a PCR of 91.3. The pavement
should be re-evaluated every five years. The following minor deficiencies have been identified
by their approximate mileage along each section.
Raveling is present occasionally with low severity. No repairs are recommended.
Patching is present at two isolated locations. No repairs are recommended at either location;
however, they should be re-evaluated prior to reconstruction.
Surface Disintegration or Debonding is present at an isolated location at Deacons Way. No
repairs are recommended at this time, however when overlays are performed, a key way should
be constructed so that layers of pavement can butt against each other producing a solid joint.
Base Failure is present occasionally with low severity. No repairs are recommended at this time.
Transverse Cracks are present occasionally with low severity. No repairs are recommended at
this time.
Edge Cracking is present occasionally with low severity. No repairs are recommended at this
time.
Polpis Road Bike Path
The path starts at the intersection of Polpis Road and Milestone Road and continues along the
south side of Polpis Road for approximately 8.2 miles. The path was originally constructed in
1998.
The Polpis Road bike path was divided into eight test sections. Each section was evaluated
separately and the cumulative Pavement Condition Rating was determined for the entire path.
The test was started at the Milestone Road end of the path and continued due east. The results for
each test section are included in Appendix G. The overall Pavement Condition Rating for the
Madaket Road Bike Path is 93.6, which corresponds with a Very Good rating.
The following minor deficiencies have been identified by their approximate mileage along each
section.
TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM
Update of the Nantucket Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan
Minor base failure along edge Pavement patch at mile 1.1
with minor edge cracking mile 0.5
Transverse joint at mile 2.5 Drainage trench at mile 3.2
TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM
Update of the Nantucket Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan
Base failure along edge mile 6.2 Base failure at mile 7.0
Recommendations
The Polpis Road Bike Path is in very good condition with an overall PCR of 93.6. The pavement
should be re-evaluated every five years. The following minor deficiencies have been identified
by their approximate mileage along each section.
Raveling is present occasionally with low severity. No repairs are recommended at this time.
Patching is present occasionally with low severity. However, there are two locations where
utility trenches cross the bike path. The trench locations are at approximately mile 1.6 and mile
3.2. These trenches should be reconstructed with full depth pavement.
Quantity = 30 feet long x 8 feet wide = 240 SF
Cost= 240 SF x $4.00/SF = $960.00
Base Failure is present occasionally with low to moderate severity. There are two locations
where the bike path should be reconstructed with full depth pavement. These locations are at
approximately mile 6.2 and mile 7.0.
Quantity = 80 feet long x 8 feet wide = 240 SF
Cost= 640 SF x $4.00/SF = $2560.00
Pressure Damage Upheaval is present occasionally with low severity. No repairs are
recommended at this time.
TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM
Update of the Nantucket Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan
Edge Cracking is present occasionally with low severity. No repairs are recommended at this
time.
Eel Point Road Bike Path
The path starts at the intersection of Eel Point Road and Madaket Road and continues along the
east side of Eel Point Road for approximately 0.9 miles. The path was originally constructed in
2000.
The Eel Point Road bike path was treated as one section. The results for each test section are
included in Appendix H The test was started at the Madaket Road end of the path and continued
due west. The Pavement Condition Rating for the Eel Point Road bike path is 99.0, which
corresponds with a Very Good rating.
Very few minor deficiencies were present along the path. The deficiencies were limited to very
minor edge cracking.
Minor edge cracking
Recommendations
The Eel Point Road Bike Path is in very good condition overall with very minor edge cracking in
a few isolated locations. The pavement should be re-evaluated every five years. No repairs are
recommended at this time.
Table 3 - Maintenace PlanUpdate of the Nantucket Bicycle andPedestrian Master PlanPrepared by: Greenman-Pedersen, Inc. Prepared for:Nantucket Planning and Economic Development CommissionDate of Inventory: August 24&25, 2005 Quantity Cost Time Quantity Cost Time Quantity Cost Time Quantity Cost Time Quantity Cost Time Short LongPath SF Frame SF Frame SF Frame SF Frame SF Frame Immediate Term Term AnnualMilestone Road25 $100 S 640 $3,520 S 270000 $1,300 A N/A $0 N/A N/A $0 N/A $0 $3,620 $0 $1,300Surfside RoadN/A $0 N/A N/A $0 N/A 106000 $500 A N/A $0 N/A N/A $0 N/A $0 $0 $0 $500Madaket Road1200 $4,800 S 480 $2,640 S 240000 $1,100 A 1600 $3,200 S 1 LS $20,000 I $20,000 $10,640 $0 $1,100Cliff RoadN/A $0 N/A N/A $0 N/A 60000 $300 A N/A $0 N/A N/A $0 N/A $0 $0 $0 $300Polpis Road880 $3,520 S N/A $0 N/A 350000 $1,600 A N/A $0 N/A N/A $0 N/A $0 $3,520 $0 $1,600Eel Point RoadN/A $0 N/A N/A $0 N/A 45000 $200 A N/A $0 N/A N/A $0 N/A $0 $0 $0 $200 Time Frame for ImprovementsI = Immediate - within 1 yearS = Short Term - 1-5 yearsL = Long Term - 5-10 YearsA = AnnualNantucket Bike Path Pavement EvaluationOtherType Of MaintenanceRecommended Maintenance PlanTotalsPatching Crack Sealing Sweeping and Cleaning Overlay
TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM
Update of the Nantucket Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan
APPENDIX
Appendix A – NP&EDC Memorandum Re. Modified Project Descriptions
Appendix B – Pavement Condition Rating Procedures
Appendix C – Milestone Road Section PCR
Appendix D - Surfside Road Section PCR
Appendix E – Madaket Road Section PCR
Appendix F – Cliff Road Section PCR
Appendix G – Polpis Road Section PCR
Appendix H – Eel Point Road Section PCR
TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM
Update of the Nantucket Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan
Appendix A – NP&EDC Memorandum Re. Modified Project Descriptions
PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION IMPROVEMENTS
The following recommendations for construction improvements provide a description of
scope and magnitude-of-cost for improvements to, or expansion of, the bicycle and
pedestrian transportation system throughout the island:
1. Surfside Road:
1.1
Project Description:
1.1 Surfside Road (Listed as 1a in the 1994 Plan)
• On west side of road, beginning near First Way, widen existing 6-foot wide
asphalt path by 4-feet for a distance of 600 feet to the north.
• Install crosswalk at this location to connect to east side of road between two
driveways to the High School.
• Install Bicycle Crossing Sign (W1l-1) 250 feet south of crossing on east side
of road.
• Widen existing 3-foot wide concrete sidewalk by 5 feet for a distance of 250
feet to the north.
• Construct a bicycle path connecting Surfside Road and Sparks Avenue at
southeastern part of intersection for a distance of 200 feet.
Magnitude of Cost:
Project ID Location Material
Length
(Feet)
Add. Width
(Feet)Unit Cost Design Cost
Construction
Cost
1.1 Surfside Rd. @ First Way asphalt 600 4 $0.00 $0.00
Surfside Rd. @
Highschool concrete 250 5 $0.00 $0.00
Sparks/Surfside asphalt 200 10 $0.00 $0.00
Total 1,050 $0.00 $0.00
2. Pleasant Street (listed as 2a and 5d in 1994 Plan)
(Option A): Convert the existing two-way traffic pattern on Pleasant St. to a one-way
traffic pattern in the westbound direction between Sparks Ave. and the Five-
Corners intersection.
12.0’ 2.1
Project Description:
2.1 Pleasant St. between Sparks Ave. and West Creek Rd. (length = 190-feet)
• Provide a 12-foot wide one-way travel lane on Pleasant St.
• Construct an 8-foot wide brick sidewalk with granite curbing on both
sides of Pleasant St.
10.0’
2.2
2.2 Pleasant St. between West Creek Rd. and Daves St. (length = 425-feet)
• Provide an 8-foot wide parallel parking lane along the south side of
Pleasant St.
• Provide a 10-foot wide one-way travel lane.
• Provide a 16-foot wide angle parking lane.
• Construct a 6-foot wide cobblestone lane on Pleasant St. between the
angle parking lane and the one-way travel lane.
• Construct an 8-foot wide brick sidewalk with granite curbing on both
sides of Pleasant St.
10.0’
2.3
2.3 Pleasant St. between Daves St. and Cherry St. (length = 1,300-feet)
• Provide an 8-foot wide parallel parking lane along both sides of Pleasant
St.
• Provide a 10-foot wide one-way travel lane.
• Construct an 8-foot wide brick sidewalk with granite curbing on both
sides of Pleasant St.
11.0’
2.4
2.4 Pleasant St. between Williams St. and Gardner Perry Ln. (length = 520-feet)
• Provide an 11-foot one-way travel lane.
• Construct an 8-foot wide brick sidewalk with granite curbing on both
sides of Pleasant St.
2.5 5 - 8.0’
sidewalks
5 - 8.0’
sidewalks 10.0’
2.5 Pleasant St. between Gardner Perry Ln. and Atlantic Ave. (length = 500-feet)
• Provide an 8-foot wide parallel parking lane on south side of Pleasant St.
• Provide a 10-foot wide one-way travel lane.
• Construct a 5 to 8-foot wide brick sidewalk with granite curbing on both
sides of Pleasant St.
Magnitude of Cost:
Project ID Location Material
Length
(Feet)
Add. Width
(Feet)Unit Cost Design Cost
Construction
Cost
2.1 Pleasant Street brick 190 16 $0.00 $0.00
2.2 Pleasant Street brick 425 16
cobblestone 425 6
2.3 Pleasant Street brick 1300 16
2.4 Pleasant Street brick 520 16
2.5 Pleasant Street brick 500 16
Total 3,360 $0.00 $0.00
(Option B): Preserve existing traffic pattern along Pleasant St. and ancillary streets.
2.1 10.0’ 10.0’
Project Description:
2.1 Pleasant St. between Sparks Ave. and West Creek Rd. (length = 190-feet)
• Construct an 8-foot wide brick sidewalk with granite curbing on both
sides of Pleasant St.
• Provide two 10-foot wide two-way travel lanes.
10.0’ 10.0’ 2.2
2.2 Pleasant St. between West Creek Rd. and Daves St. (length = 425-feet)
• Provide two 8-foot wide parallel parking lanes along both sides of
Pleasant St.
• Provide two 10-foot wide two-way travel lanes.
• Construct an 8-foot wide brick sidewalk with granite curbing on both
sides of Pleasant St.
2.3 10.0’ 10.0’
2.3 Pleasant St. between Daves St. and Cherry St. (length = 1,300-feet)
• Provide two 8-foot wide parallel parking lane along both sides of
Pleasant St.
• Provide two 10-foot wide one-way travel lanes.
• Construct an 8-foot wide brick sidewalk with granite curbing on both
sides of Pleasant St.
5 - 8.0’
sidewalks
5 - 8.0’
sidewalks 2.4 10.0’ 10.0’
2.4 Pleasant St. between 5-Corners and Williams St.
• Construct two 5 to 8-foot wide brick sidewalk with granite curbing on
both sides of Pleasant St.
• Provide two 8-foot wide brick sidewalks with granite curbing on both
sides of Pleasant St.
Magnitude of Cost:
Project ID Location Material
Length
(Feet)
Add. Width
(Feet)Unit Cost Design Cost
Construction
Cost
2.1 Pleasant Street brick 190 16 $0.00 $0.00
2.2 Pleasant Street brick 425 16
cobblestone 425 6
2.3 Pleasant Street brick 1300 16
2.4 Pleasant Street brick 520 16
2.5 Pleasant Street brick 500 16
Total 3,360 $0.00 $0.00
3. Nantucket Cottage Hospital: Prospect Street to Vesper Lane (listed as project
3a and 3b in 1994 plan)
3.1B
3.1 C
3.1A
Project Description:
3.1 Nantucket Cottage Hospital
Option A
• Construct a 10-foot wide bicycle path, 1,080-feet long, connecting
Prospect St and Vesper Ln along a portion of Chicken Hill and N. Mill
St.
Option B
• Construct a 10-foot wide bicycle path, 865-feet long, connecting
Prospect St and Vesper Ln along the western portion of the Hospital
property
Option C
• Construct a 10-foot wide bicycle path, 360-feet long, connecting
Prospect St and Vesper Ln along the eastern portion of the Hospital
property, and along the western portion of the Hospital housing.
Magnitude of Cost:
Project ID Location Material
Length
(Feet)
Add. Width
(Feet)Unit Cost Design Cost
Construction
Cost
3.1A Hospital asphalt 1080 10 $0.00 $0.00
3.1B Hospital asphalt 865 10 $0.00 $0.00
3.1C Hospital asphalt 360 10 $0.00 $0.00
Total 360 $0.00 $0.00
4. Sparks Avenue (listed as projects 4a, 1b, 2b, and 2c in the 1994 Plan)
(Option A): Combination of 5-foot and 8- to 10-foot sidewalks
4.2
4.1
Project Description:
4.1 Sparks Avenue between Milestone Rotary and Pleasant St. Roundabout
• Construct 5-foot wide brick sidewalk with granite curbing along north
side of Sparks Ave. A 3-foot grass strip should be provided to separate
travel lane and sidewalk where possible.
• Construct 8 to 10-foot asphalt sidewalk with asphalt curbing along the
south side of Sparks Ave.
4.2 Sparks Ave. between Pleasant St. Roundabout Williams Ln.
• Construct 5-foot wide brick sidewalk with granite curbing along north
side of Sparks Ave. A 3-foot grass strip should be provided to separate
travel lane and sidewalk where possible.
• Construct 8 to 10-foot asphalt sidewalk with asphalt curbing along the
south side of Sparks Ave.
Magnitude of Cost:
Project ID Location Material
Length
(Feet)
Add. Width
(Feet)Unit Cost Design Cost
Construction
Cost
4.1 Sparks Ave.asphalt 450 8 $0.00 $0.00
brick 450 5
4.2 Sparks Ave.asphalt 2300 8 $0.00 $0.00
brick 2300 5
Total 5,500 $0.00 $0.00
(Option B): Combination of 5-foot sidewalks and 4-foot bike lanes.
4.2
4.1Project Description:
4.1 Sparks Avenue between Milestone Rotary and Pleasant St. Roundabout
• Construct 5-foot wide brick sidewalk with granite curbing along north
side of Sparks Ave. A 3-foot grass strip should be provided to separate
travel lane and sidewalk where possible.
• Construct 5-foot wide asphalt sidewalk with asphalt curbing along south
side of Sparks Ave.
• Provide a 4-foot wide bicycle lane on both sides of Sparks Ave. between
the travel lane and the sidewalk.
4.2 Sparks Ave. between Pleasant St. Roundabout and Williams Ln.
• Construct 5-foot wide brick sidewalk with granite curbing along north
side of Sparks Ave. A 3-foot grass strip should be provided to separate
travel lane and sidewalk where possible.
• Construct 5-foot wide asphalt sidewalk with asphalt curbing along south
side of Sparks Ave.
• Provide a 4- to 5-foot wide bicycle lane on both sides of Sparks Ave.
between the travel lane and the sidewalk.
Magnitude of Cost:
Project ID Location Material
Length
(Feet)
Add. Width
(Feet)Unit Cost Design Cost
Construction
Cost
4.1 Sparks Ave.asphalt 450 bike lane $0.00 $0.00
brick 450 5
4.2 Sparks Ave.asphalt 2300 bike lane $0.00 $0.00
brick 2300 5
Total 5,500 $0.00 $0.00
5. Orange Street (listed as 5a and 1e in the 1994 Plan)
(Option A): Combination of 5-foot and 8- to 10-foot sidewalks
5.1
Project Description:
5.1 Orange Street (listed as 5a in 1995 Plan)
• Construct a 5-foot wide brick sidewalk with granite curbing on the
northeastern side of Orange St. between the Milestone Rotary and Bear
St. A 3-foot grass strip should be provided to separate travel lane and
sidewalk where possible.
• Construct an 8-foot wide brick sidewalk with granite curbing on
southwestern side of Orange St. between the Milestone Rotary and Bear
St.
5.2
5.2 Old Railroad Right-of-Way (listed as 1e in 1995 Plan)
• Construct bicycle path (material to be determined) along existing berm,
connecting end of Washington Street Extension to Orange Street at Bear
Street intersection, a distance of 800 feet (additional easements may be
needed).
5.3
5.3 Washington St. Bicycle Route
• Designate Washington St. as a class III bicycle route with share-the-road
signage between the Old Railroad Right-of-Way to Commercial St.
Magnitude of Cost:
Project ID Location Material
Length
(Feet)
Add. Width
(Feet)Unit Cost Design Cost
Construction
Cost
5.1 Lower Orange St. brick 1950 10 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
brick 1950 5
5.2 Old Railroad ROW TBD 800 10 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
Total 4,700 $0.00 $0.00
(Option B): Combination of 5-foot sidewalks, 4-foot bike lanes, and bike route.
5.1
Project Description:
5.1 Orange Street (listed as 5a in 1995 Plan)
• Construct 5-foot wide brick sidewalk with granite curbing along
northeastern side of Orange St. between the Milestone Rotary and Bear
St. A 3-foot grass strip should be provided to separate travel lane and
sidewalk where possible.
• Construct 5-foot wide brick sidewalk with granite curbing along
southwestern side of Orange St. between the Milestone Rotary and
Union St. A 3-foot grass strip should be provided to separate travel lane
and sidewalk where possible.
• Provide a 4 to 5-foot wide bicycle lane on both sides of Sparks Ave.
between the travel lane and the sidewalk.
5.2
5.2 Union St. and Upper Orange Street Bicycle Route
• Construct bicycle path on existing berm, connecting end of Washington
Street Extension to Orange Street at Bear Street intersection, a distance
of 800 feet (easements required near Goose Pond Lane, a private road).
Magnitude of Cost:
Project ID Location Material
Length
(Feet)
Add. Width
(Feet)Unit Cost
Design
Cost
Construction
Cost
5.1 Lower Orange St. brick 2400 5 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
brick 1950 5 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
5.2 Lower Orange St. asphalt 2400 bike lane $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
Total 6,750 $0.00 $0.00
6. Prospect Street and Quaker Road
6.3
6.2
6.1
Project Description:
6.1 Prospect Street between Surfside Rd. and W. York Ln. (listed as 5b in 1995
Plan)
• Construct a 5-foot wide brick sidewalk with granite curbing on southwest
side of Prospect St. between Surfide Rd. and W. York Ln.
6.2 Prospect St. between W. York Ln. and 27 Prospect St.
• Construct a 10-foot wide bicycle path along the southwestern side of
Prospect St. between W. York Ln. and 27 Prospect St.
6.3 Prospect St. between 27 Prospect St. and Milk St.
• Construct a 5-foot wide brick sidewalk with granite curbing along the
southwestern side of Prospect St. between 27 Prospect St. and Milk St.
6.4
6.4 Quaker Road (listed as 5c in 1995 Plan)
• Construct an approximately 5-foot wide asphalt sidewalk with granite
curbing or multi-use lane with appropriate stripping along the western
side of Quaker Road between Madaket Road and Milk Street.
Magnitude of Cost:
Project ID Location Material
Length
(Feet)
Add. Width
(Feet)Unit Cost Design Cost
Construction
Cost
6.1 Prospect St.brick 250 5 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
6.2 Prospect St.asphalt 1500 10 $0.00
6.3 Prospect St.brick 900 5 $0.00
6.4 Quaker Rd.asphalt 900 5 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
Total 3,550 $0.00 $0.00
7. Bicycle Improvement: Nobadeer Farm Road to Nantucket Memorial Airport
7.1
7.2
Project Description:
7.1 Nobadeer Farm Road
• Construct a 10-foot wide bicycle path, 960-feet long, along the west side
of Nobadeer Farm Road, 50-feet from the right-of-way edge, beginning
at the Milestone Rd. bike path.
7.2 Nobadeer Farm Road (listed as 9a in 1995 Plan)
• Construct a 10-foot wide bicycle path between Macys Ln. and an area
along Nobadeer Farm Rd. 450-feet north of Sun Island Rd. The bicycle
path should be along the western edge of property abutting the west side
of Nobadeer Farm Rd.
• Appropriate lighting for safety should be provided.
7.3
7.3 Nobadeer Farm Road
Section A - Priority
• Construct an 8-foot brick sidewalk with granite curbing along the east
side of Nobadeer Farm Road between Sun Island Road and Old South
Road.
Sectoin B – Secondary
• Construct a 8-foot brick sidewalk with granite curbing along the west side
of Nobadeer Farm Road between Sun Island Road and Old South Road.
Magnitude of Cost:
Project ID Location Material
Length
(Feet)
Add. Width
(Feet)Unit Cost
Design
Cost
Construction
Cost
7.1 Nobadeer Farm Rd.asphalt 960 10
7.2 Nobadeer Farm Rd.asphalt 1500 10 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
7.3A Nobadeer Farm Rd.Brick 1575 8
7.3B Nobadeer Farm Rd.Brick 1575 8
Total 4,650 $0.00 $0.00
8. Bicycle Improvement: Bartlett Road to Hummock Pond Road (Short-term)
8.1
8.2
8.1
Project Description:
8.1 Bartlett Road (listed as 12a in 1995 Plan)
• Where possible, re-construct the existing 6-foot asphalt facility to a 10-
foot asphalt path.
8.2 Bartlett Road
• Complete connection of Surfside Bicycle Path to Somerset Bicycle Route
by constructing a 10-foot wide bicycle path along the south side of
Bartlett Road in the vicinity of Mizzenmast Road.
8.3
8.3 Somerset Road/Lane (listed as 12b in 1995 Plan)
• Designate as a bicycle route connecting Hummock Pond Bicycle Route
and Bartlett Bicycle Path.
Magnitude of Cost:
Project ID Location Material
Length
(Feet)
Add. Width
(Feet)Unit Cost Design Cost
Construction
Cost
8.1 Bartlett Rd. asphalt 2000 10 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
8.2 Bartlett Rd.asphalt 1200 10 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
Total 3,200 $0.00 $0.00
9. Hummock Pond Road and Milk Street
9.2
9.1
Project Description:
9.1 Hummock Pond Rd. (listed as 13b in 1995 Plan)
• Construct a 10-foot wide bicycle path along Hummock Pond Rd. from
the intersection of Vesper Ln., Hummock Pond Rd., and Somerset Rd.
to the intersection of Hummock Pond Road and Milk St..
9.2 Milk St. (listed as 13c in 1995 Plan)
• Designate as a bicycle route from Gardner Street to Hummock Pond
Road.
9.3
9.3 Hummock Pond Rd. (listed as 13b in 1995 Plan)
• Construct a 10-foot wide bicycle path along Hummock Pond Road
between Milk St. and Cisco Beach.
• Crossings, if needed, should be minimized.
Magnitude of Cost:
Project ID Location Material
Length
(Feet)
Add. Width
(Feet)Design Cost
Construction
Cost
9.1 Hummock Pond Rd.asphalt 1500 10 $0.00 $0.00
9.3 Hummock Pond Rd.asphalt 14700 10 $0.00 $0.00
Total 14,700 $0.00
10. Cliff Road
10.2 10.1
Project Description:
10.1 Cliff Rd. bicycle path extension
• Construct a 10-foot wide bicycle path along the north side of Cliff Rd
between Crooked Ln. and Sherburne Turnpike.
10.2 Cliff Rd. bicycle path extension
• Construct a 10-foot wide bicycle path along the north side of Cliff Rd
between Sherburne Turnpike and N. Liberty St.
10.3 Cliff Rd. bicycle path extension
• Provide unobstructed bicycle and pedestrian accommodations between
N. Liberty St. and Westchester St.
Magnitude of Cost:
Project ID Location Material
Length
(Feet)
Add. Width
(Feet)Design Cost
Construction
Cost
10.1
Cliff Rd. path
extension asphalt 2500 10 $0.00 $0.00
10.2
Cliff Rd. path
extension asphalt 1300 10 $0.00 $0.00
Total $0.00
11. Madaket Bicycle Path
11.1
Project Description:
11.1 Series of Reverse Horizontal Curves 1,000-feet west of Millbrook Rd. (listed
as 14a in 1995 Plan)
(Short Term):
• Install Warning Signs (WI-5).
• Relocate utility pole and box.
• Upgrade split rail fence to conform with AASHTO Guidelines.
• Study operational characteristics of this section.
• Comprehensive accident analysis of this section.
(Mid Term, if above doesn't work):
• Widen pavement cross section within the horizontal curves to increase
the effective width of the path, or
• Realign/upgrade to improve operating conditions.
11.2
11.2 Areas of No-Median Separation (5,280 feet) (listed as 14b in 1995 Plan) (Short
Term):
• Study the feasibility of reconstructing the path where possible to include
a 4-foot median separation or installing channelizers at edge of roadway.
11.3
11.3 Improve Access to the Bicycle Facility Entrance (listed as 14c in 1995 Plan)
• Install crosswalk across Main Street from Caton Circle to Quaker Road.
• Install crosswalk across Quaker Road linking existing bicycle facility with
Main Street.
• Install bicycle crossing signs (Wll-l) at all approaches.
• Widen the entrance throats and provide entering and exiting direction
arrows on the pavement.
Magnitude of Cost:
Project ID Location Material
Length
(Feet)
Add. Width
(Feet)Design Cost
Construction
Cost
11.1 Madaket Path S-Turns
11.2
Madaket Path No-Median
Separation
11.3
Madaket Entrance
Improvements
Total
12. Quidnet Road
12.1
Project Description:
12.1 Quidnet Road (listed as 17a in 1995 Plan)
• Construct bicycle path on the north side of Quidnet Road between
Polpis Road and Squam Road (6,860 feet).
• Project is considered a low priority.
Magnitude of Cost:
Project ID Location Material
Length
(Feet)
Add. Width
(Feet)Unit Cost Design Cost
Construction
Cost
12.1 Quidnet Rd.asphalt 6860 10 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
Total 6,860 $0.00 $0.00
13. Tom Nevers Road
13.2
13.1
Project Description:
13.1 Tom Nevers Road (listed as 17b in 1995 Plan)
• Construct bicycle path on the east side of Tom Nevers Road (7,390 feet).
• Project is considered a low priority.
13.2 Tom Nevers Road (listed as 17b in 1995 Plan)
• Construct bicycle path along Tom Nevers Road between Old Tom
Nevers Rd. and the Tom Nevers Playing Fields (4,300-feet).
• Project is considered a low priority.
Magnitude of Cost:
Project ID Location Material
Length
(Feet)
Add. Width
(Feet)Unit Cost Design Cost
Construction
Cost
13.1 Tom Nevers Rd.asphalt 7390 10 $0.00 $0.00
13.2 Tom Nevers Rd.asphalt 4300 10 $0.00 $0.00
Total 4,300 $0.00 $0.00
14. Bear Street (listed as 1d in 1995 Plan)
14.1
Project Description:
14.1 Bear St. between Orange St. and Pleasant St.
• Reconstruct roadway to provide a one-way travel lane and separated
bicycle path between Pleasant St. and Orange St.
• Install crosswalk on Orange Street, connecting Bear Street bicycle path to
new path along old railroad right-of-way.
• Install Bicycle Crossing sign (Wll-1) on both sides of Orange Street 250
feet in advance of crossing.
• Trim vegetation along Orange Street to improve sight distance at
crossing.
• Project is considered a low priority.
Magnitude of Cost:
Project ID Location Material
Length
(Feet)
Add. Width
(Feet)Unit Cost Total
14.1 Bear St.asphalt 725 10 $0.00 $0.00
Total 725 $0.00
15. Boys Club Property (listed as 1c in 1995 Plan)
15.1
Project Description:
15.1 Boys and Girls Club between Pleasant St. and Sparks Ave.
• Construct bicycle path, 400 feet long, connecting Sparks Avenue and
Pleasant Street across southeastern edge of Boys Club property
(easement required).
• Install crosswalk across Pleasant Street, linking proposed bicycle path
between Boys Club site and Bear Street.
• Install Bicycle Crossing signs (Wll-1) on both sides of Pleasant Street 250
feet in advance of crossing.
• Project is considered a low priority.
Magnitude of Cost:
Project ID Location Material
Length
(Feet)
Add. Width
(Feet)Unit Cost Total
15.1 Boys and Girls Club asphalt 350 10 $0.00 $0.00
Total 350 $0.00
16. Washington, Francis and Union Streets (listed as 5f in 1995 Plan)
Project Description:
16.1 Washington, Francis, and Union Streets
• Upgrade existing sidewalks on Washington and Francis Streets and on
Union Street between Francis and Orange Streets.
Magnitude of Cost:
Project ID Location Material
Length
(Feet)
Add. Width
(Feet)Unit Cost Total
16.1 Washington St.**1700 ******
Francis St.**300 ******
Union St.**1300 ******
Total 3,300 $0.00
NON-CONSTRUCTION IMPROVEMENTS
The following recommendations affect the bicycle and pedestrian transportation system
throughout the island:
1. The designated bicycle route system should be reviewed periodically by the
NP&EDC and the Nantucket Department of Public Works in concert with the
Traffic Safety Committee, and the Board of Selectmen.
2. Designate Bicycle Route System in Town
• See previous chapter for recommended bicycle route system.
• Install minimal signing downtown directing bicyclists to major bicycle
paths (Milestone, Surfside, Madaket, Cliff and Polpis) and bicycle routes
to Cisco Beach and Jetties Beach.
• Install directional signs at turns along designated routes.
• Publish map of bicycle routes which includes bicycle safety information
and description of roadway conditions.
3. New bicycle paths should conform to AASHTO guidelines to the extent feasible.
Current AASHTO guidelines require a minimum width of 10 feet. The guidelines
also call for a minimum separation of five feet between the path and the roadway,
and two feet of clear space between the path and adjacent landscaping.
4. A comprehensive bicycle education program should be developed. A key component
of the program is the preparation and distribution of a map of bicycle facilities. The
map should include bicycle safety information and appropriate cautions on bicycle
routes. While there are no national standards on bicycle routes (shared roadways),
the streets and roads selected as bicycle routes on Nantucket should be those that
present the least conflicts between bicyclists and vehicles. It is important that this
information be conveyed on the bicycle maps and in other bicycle education
materials published by the Town.
5. Maintenance of bicycle paths should include sweeping the trail clear of debris (i.e.,
glass, sand, branches, etc.), mowing grass medians and shoulders, tree pruning (to
avoid overgrowth which may interfere with the operational characteristics of the
path), trash removal (to maintain a pleasing environment), sign replacement,
pavement marking replacement, and trail surface maintenance and rehabilitation (to
ensure distress free travel surfaces). Maintenance of bicycle routes should also
include sweeping roadway edges to clear road debris (i.e., glass, sand, branches, etc.),
eliminating pavement distress along the roadway shoulders (i.e., edge cracking, pot
holes, etc.) and maintaining a sign program designating bicycle route classification.
6. Downtown Information Center and Bicycle Parking Facilities
• Provide additional bicycle parking facilities in a central location downtown.
• Display downtown and island bikeway system maps and bicycle safety
information at existing visitor information centers.
7. Handicapped Accessibility Improvements
• Implement recommendations of Access Plus Study with respect to wheelchair
ramps and sidewalk improvements downtown.
TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM
Update of the Nantucket Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan
Appendix B – Pavement Condition Rating Procedures
TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM
Update of the Nantucket Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan
Appendix C – Milestone Road Section PCR
Section:Milestone Road 1Date:8/24/2005Log mile:0to0.4Rated by:MDEDesciption:Rotary to Polpis Rd Bike Path# of Utility Cuts:1LOCALPAVEMENT CONDITION RATING FORMDISTRESSDISTRESSSEVERITY*EXTENT2SEVERITYEXTENTSEVERITYEXTENTDEDUCTWEIGHTLMHOFELMHOFEPOINTS3RAVELING10xx0.30.610.50.810.30.51.5BLEEDING50.80.810.60.91000PATCHING50.30.610.60.81000SURFACE DISINTEGRATION OR DEBONDING50.30.610.60.81000RUTTING100.30.710.60.81*000MAP CRACKING50.20.610.40.81000BASE FAILURE100.60.810.70.91*000SETTLEMENTS50.40.710.60.81000TRANSVERSE CRACKS10xx0.40.710.50.71*0.70.53.5WHEEL TRACK CRACKING150.40.710.50.71*000LONGITUDUNAL CRACKING50.20.610.40.81*000EDGE CRACKING5xx0.40.710.50.71*0.713.5PRESSURE DAMAGE/UPHEAVEL50.40.610.50.81000CRACK SEALING DEFICIENCY51110.50.81000TOTAL DEDUCT =8.51L = LOW2O = OCCASIONALSUM OF STRUCTURAL DEDUCT (∗) =7 M = MEDIUM F = FREQUENT100- TOTAL DEDUCT = PCR =91.5 H = HIGH E = EXTENSIVE3DEDUCT POINTS = DISTRESS WEIGHT X SEVERITY WT. X EXTENT WT.REMARKS:Test Section at Monomoy RdGenerally Good Condition - Utility TrenchMilestone 1MAX-2005112.00
Section:Milestone Road 2Date:8/24/2005Log mile:0.1to1Rated by:MDEDesciption:Polpis Rd Bike Path to Sheep Commons Ln# of Utility Cuts:0LOCALPAVEMENT CONDITION RATING FORMDISTRESSDISTRESSSEVERITY*EXTENT2SEVERITYEXTENTSEVERITYEXTENTDEDUCTWEIGHTLMHOFELMHOFEPOINTS3RAVELING10xx0.30.610.50.810.30.51.5BLEEDING50.80.810.60.91000PATCHING50.30.610.60.81000SURFACE DISINTEGRATION OR DEBONDING50.30.610.60.81000RUTTING100.30.710.60.81*000MAP CRACKING50.20.610.40.81000BASE FAILURE10xx0.60.810.70.91*0.60.74.2SETTLEMENTS50.40.710.60.81000TRANSVERSE CRACKS100.40.710.50.71*000WHEEL TRACK CRACKING150.40.710.50.71*000LONGITUDUNAL CRACKING50.20.610.40.81*000EDGE CRACKING5xx0.40.710.50.71*0.40.51PRESSURE DAMAGE/UPHEAVEL50.40.610.50.81000CRACK SEALING DEFICIENCY51110.50.81000TOTAL DEDUCT =6.71L = LOW2O = OCCASIONALSUM OF STRUCTURAL DEDUCT (∗) = 5.2 M = MEDIUM F = FREQUENT100- TOTAL DEDUCT = PCR =93.3 H = HIGH E = EXTENSIVE3DEDUCT POINTS = DISTRESS WEIGHT X SEVERITY WT. X EXTENT WT.REMARKS:Test at Tawpoot Road .8 milesMilestone 2MAX-2005112.00
Section:Milestone Road 3Date:8/24/2005Log mile:1to2.2Rated by:MDEDescription: Sheep Commons Ln to Bunker Rd# of Utility Cuts:0LOCALPAVEMENT CONDITION RATING FORMDISTRESSDISTRESSSEVERITY*EXTENT2SEVERITYEXTENTSEVERITYEXTENTDEDUCTWEIGHTLMHOFELMHOFEPOINTS3RAVELING10xx0.30.610.50.810.30.51.5BLEEDING50.80.810.60.91000PATCHING50.30.610.60.81000SURFACE DISINTEGRATION OR DEBONDING5xx0.30.610.60.810.30.60.9RUTTING10xx0.30.710.60.81*0.30.61.8MAP CRACKING50.20.610.40.81000BASE FAILURE10 0.60.810.70.91*000SETTLEMENTS50.40.710.60.81000TRANSVERSE CRACKS100.40.710.50.71*000WHEEL TRACK CRACKING150.40.710.50.71*000LONGITUDUNAL CRACKING50.20.610.40.81*000EDGE CRACKING50.40.710.50.71*000PRESSURE DAMAGE/UPHEAVEL50.40.610.50.81000CRACK SEALING DEFICIENCY51110.50.81000TOTAL DEDUCT =4.21L = LOW2O = OCCASIONALSUM OF STRUCTURAL DEDUCT (∗) = 1.8 M = MEDIUM F = FREQUENT100- TOTAL DEDUCT = PCR =95.8 H = HIGH E = EXTENSIVE3DEDUCT POINTS = DISTRESS WEIGHT X SEVERITY WT. X EXTENT WT.REMARKS:Mile 1.2 - Debonding Mile 1.5 Test Section - Nobadeer Farm RdSlight ravelling and potholes along edgesMilestone 3MAX-2005112.00
Section:Milestone Road 4Date:24-AugLog mile:2.2to3Rated by:MDEDescription: Bunker Rd to Larson Acres# of Utility Cuts:1LOCALPAVEMENT CONDITION RATING FORMDISTRESSDISTRESSSEVERITY*EXTENT2SEVERITYEXTENTSEVERITYEXTENTDEDUCTWEIGHTLMHOFELMHOFEPOINTS3RAVELING10xx0.30.610.50.810.30.51.5BLEEDING50.80.810.60.91000PATCHING50.30.610.60.81000SURFACE DISINTEGRATION OR DEBONDING50.30.610.60.81000RUTTING100.30.710.60.81*000MAP CRACKING50.20.610.40.81000BASE FAILURE10xx0.60.810.70.91*0.60.74.2SETTLEMENTS5xx0.40.710.60.810.40.61.2TRANSVERSE CRACKS10xx0.40.710.50.71*10.55WHEEL TRACK CRACKING150.40.710.50.71*000LONGITUDUNAL CRACKING50.20.610.40.81*000EDGE CRACKING50.40.710.50.71*000PRESSURE DAMAGE/UPHEAVEL50.40.610.50.81000CRACK SEALING DEFICIENCY51110.50.81000TOTAL DEDUCT =11.91L = LOW2O = OCCASIONALSUM OF STRUCTURAL DEDUCT (∗) = 9.2 M = MEDIUM F = FREQUENT100- TOTAL DEDUCT = PCR =88.1 H = HIGH E = EXTENSIVE3DEDUCT POINTS = DISTRESS WEIGHT X SEVERITY WT. X EXTENT WT.REMARKS:Test section at 2.5 Some Settling Milestone 4MAX-2005112.00
Section:Milestone Road 5Date:8/24/2005Log mile:3to3.8Rated by:MDEDescription: Larson Acres to Tom Nevers Rd# of Utility Cuts:0LOCALPAVEMENT CONDITION RATING FORMDISTRESSDISTRESSSEVERITY*EXTENT2SEVERITYEXTENTSEVERITYEXTENTDEDUCTWEIGHTLMHOFELMHOFEPOINTS3RAVELING10xx0.30.610.50.810.30.51.5BLEEDING50.80.810.60.91000PATCHING50.30.610.60.81000SURFACE DISINTEGRATION OR DEBONDING50.30.610.60.81000RUTTING10xx0.30.710.60.81*0.30.61.8MAP CRACKING50.20.610.40.81000BASE FAILURE100.60.810.70.91*000SETTLEMENTS50.40.710.60.81000TRANSVERSE CRACKS10xx0.40.710.50.71*0.40.52WHEEL TRACK CRACKING150.40.710.50.71*000LONGITUDUNAL CRACKING50.20.610.40.81*000EDGE CRACKING50.40.710.50.71*000PRESSURE DAMAGE/UPHEAVEL50.40.610.50.81000CRACK SEALING DEFICIENCY51110.50.81000TOTAL DEDUCT =5.31L = LOW2O = OCCASIONALSUM OF STRUCTURAL DEDUCT (∗) = 3.8 M = MEDIUM F = FREQUENT100- TOTAL DEDUCT = PCR =94.7 H = HIGH E = EXTENSIVE3DEDUCT POINTS = DISTRESS WEIGHT X SEVERITY WT. X EXTENT WT.REMARKS:Test at 3.5Rutting and transverse cracks probably caused by tree roots moving under pavementMilestone 5MAX-2005112.00
Section:Milestone Road 6Date:8/24/2005Log mile:3.8to4.8Rated by:MDEDescription: Tom Nevers Rd to Chuck Hollow Rd# of Utility Cuts:LOCALPAVEMENT CONDITION RATING FORMDISTRESSDISTRESSSEVERITY*EXTENT2SEVERITYEXTENTSEVERITYEXTENTDEDUCTWEIGHTLMHOFELMHOFEPOINTS3RAVELING10xx0.30.610.50.810.30.51.5BLEEDING50.80.810.60.91000PATCHING50.30.610.60.81000SURFACE DISINTEGRATION OR DEBONDING50.30.610.60.81000RUTTING10xx0.30.710.60.81*0.30.61.8MAP CRACKING50.20.610.40.81000BASE FAILURE100.60.810.70.91*000SETTLEMENTS50.40.710.60.81000TRANSVERSE CRACKS100.40.710.50.71*000WHEEL TRACK CRACKING150.40.710.50.71*000LONGITUDUNAL CRACKING50.20.610.40.81*000EDGE CRACKING5xx0.40.710.50.71*0.70.51.75PRESSURE DAMAGE/UPHEAVEL50.40.610.50.81000CRACK SEALING DEFICIENCY51110.50.81000TOTAL DEDUCT =5.051L = LOW2O = OCCASIONALSUM OF STRUCTURAL DEDUCT (∗) = 3.55 M = MEDIUM F = FREQUENT100- TOTAL DEDUCT = PCR =95.0 H = HIGH E = EXTENSIVE3DEDUCT POINTS = DISTRESS WEIGHT X SEVERITY WT. X EXTENT WT.REMARKS:Test at mile 4.3Repaved Section at mile 4.1 and 4.4Milestone 6MAX-2005112.00
Section:Milestone Road 7Date:8/24/2005Log mile:4.8to5.8Rated by:MDEDescription: Chuck Hollow Rd to Philips Run Rd# of Utility Cuts:0LOCALPAVEMENT CONDITION RATING FORMDISTRESSDISTRESSSEVERITY*EXTENT2SEVERITYEXTENTSEVERITYEXTENTDEDUCTWEIGHTLMHOFELMHOFEPOINTS3RAVELING100.30.610.50.81000BLEEDING50.80.810.60.91000PATCHING5xx0.30.610.60.810.30.60.9SURFACE DISINTEGRATION OR DEBONDING50.30.610.60.81000RUTTING10xx0.30.710.60.81*0.30.61.8MAP CRACKING50.20.610.40.81000BASE FAILURE100.60.810.70.91*000SETTLEMENTS50.40.710.60.81000TRANSVERSE CRACKS10xx0.40.710.50.71*0.40.52WHEEL TRACK CRACKING150.40.710.50.71*000LONGITUDUNAL CRACKING50.20.610.40.81*000EDGE CRACKING50.40.710.50.71*000PRESSURE DAMAGE/UPHEAVEL50.40.610.50.81000CRACK SEALING DEFICIENCY51110.50.81000TOTAL DEDUCT =4.71L = LOW2O = OCCASIONALSUM OF STRUCTURAL DEDUCT (∗) = 3.8 M = MEDIUM F = FREQUENT100- TOTAL DEDUCT = PCR =95.3 H = HIGH E = EXTENSIVE3DEDUCT POINTS = DISTRESS WEIGHT X SEVERITY WT. X EXTENT WT.REMARKS:test at mile 5.3occasional areas of slight ruttingPatch at mile 5.6milestone 7MAX-2005112.00
Section:Milestone Road 8Date:8/24/2005Log mile:5.8to6.2Rated by:MDEDescription: Philips Run Road to End# of Utility Cuts:1 at mile 5.9LOCALPAVEMENT CONDITION RATING FORMDISTRESSDISTRESSSEVERITY*EXTENT2SEVERITYEXTENTSEVERITYEXTENTDEDUCTWEIGHTLMHOFELMHOFEPOINTS3RAVELING100.30.610.50.81000BLEEDING50.80.810.60.91000PATCHING50.30.610.60.81000SURFACE DISINTEGRATION OR DEBONDING50.30.610.60.81000RUTTING100.30.710.60.81*000MAP CRACKING50.20.610.40.81000BASE FAILURE100.60.810.70.91*000SETTLEMENTS50.40.710.60.81000TRANSVERSE CRACKS10xx0.40.710.50.71*0.40.52WHEEL TRACK CRACKING150.40.710.50.71*000LONGITUDUNAL CRACKING50.20.610.40.81*000EDGE CRACKING50.40.710.50.71*000PRESSURE DAMAGE/UPHEAVEL50.40.610.50.81000CRACK SEALING DEFICIENCY51110.50.81000TOTAL DEDUCT =21L = LOW2O = OCCASIONALSUM OF STRUCTURAL DEDUCT (∗) = 2 M = MEDIUM F = FREQUENT100- TOTAL DEDUCT = PCR =98 H = HIGH E = EXTENSIVE3DEDUCT POINTS = DISTRESS WEIGHT X SEVERITY WT. X EXTENT WT.REMARKS:Mlestone 8MAX-2005112.00
TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM
Update of the Nantucket Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan
Appendix D - Surfside Road Section PCR
Section:Surfside Rd 1Date:8/24/2005Log mile:0to1.2Rated by:MDEDescription: Start to Gladlands Ave# of Utility Cuts:LOCALPAVEMENT CONDITION RATING FORMDISTRESSDISTRESSSEVERITY*EXTENT2SEVERITYEXTENTSEVERITYEXTENTDEDUCTWEIGHTLMHOFELMHOFEPOINTS3RAVELING10xx0.30.610.50.810.30.51.5BLEEDING50.80.810.60.91000PATCHING50.30.610.60.81000SURFACE DISINTEGRATION OR DEBONDING50.30.610.60.81000RUTTING100.30.710.60.81*000MAP CRACKING50.20.610.40.81000BASE FAILURE100.60.810.70.91*000SETTLEMENTS50.40.710.60.81000TRANSVERSE CRACKS100.40.710.50.71*000WHEEL TRACK CRACKING150.40.710.50.71*000LONGITUDUNAL CRACKING50.20.610.40.81*000EDGE CRACKING50.40.710.50.71*000PRESSURE DAMAGE/UPHEAVEL50.40.610.50.81000CRACK SEALING DEFICIENCY51110.50.81000TOTAL DEDUCT =1.51L = LOW2O = OCCASIONALSUM OF STRUCTURAL DEDUCT (∗) = 0 M = MEDIUM F = FREQUENT100- TOTAL DEDUCT = PCR =98.5 H = HIGH E = EXTENSIVE3DEDUCT POINTS = DISTRESS WEIGHT X SEVERITY WT. X EXTENT WT.REMARKS:some surface damage at intersecting driveways test at miacomet ave mile 0.6surfside 1MAX-2005112.00
Section:Surfside Rd 2Date:8/24/2005Log mile:1.2toMile 1.8Rated by:MDEDescription: Gladlands Ave to End# of Utility Cuts:LOCALPAVEMENT CONDITION RATING FORMDISTRESSDISTRESSSEVERITY*EXTENT2SEVERITYEXTENTSEVERITYEXTENTDEDUCTWEIGHTLMHOFELMHOFEPOINTS3RAVELING100.30.610.50.81000BLEEDING50.80.810.60.91000PATCHING50.30.610.60.81000SURFACE DISINTEGRATION OR DEBONDING50.30.610.60.81000RUTTING100.30.710.60.81*000MAP CRACKING50.20.610.40.81000BASE FAILURE100.60.810.70.91*000SETTLEMENTS50.40.710.60.81000TRANSVERSE CRACKS100.40.710.50.71*000WHEEL TRACK CRACKING150.40.710.50.71*000LONGITUDUNAL CRACKING50.20.610.40.81*000EDGE CRACKING50.40.710.50.71*000PRESSURE DAMAGE/UPHEAVEL50.40.610.50.81000CRACK SEALING DEFICIENCY51110.50.81000TOTAL DEDUCT =01L = LOW2O = OCCASIONALSUM OF STRUCTURAL DEDUCT (∗) = 0 M = MEDIUM F = FREQUENT100- TOTAL DEDUCT = PCR =100 H = HIGH E = EXTENSIVE3DEDUCT POINTS = DISTRESS WEIGHT X SEVERITY WT. X EXTENT WT.REMARKS:Test opposite Boulevardetest at 1.3 Slight surface damage at a few intersecting driveways surfside 2MAX-2005112.00
Section:Surside Road 3Date:8/24/2005Log mile:1.8to2.5Rated by:MDEDescription: Mile 1.8 to End# of Utility Cuts:MDELOCALPAVEMENT CONDITION RATING FORMDISTRESSDISTRESSSEVERITY*EXTENT2SEVERITYEXTENTSEVERITYEXTENTDEDUCTWEIGHTLMHOFELMHOFEPOINTS3RAVELING100.30.610.50.81000BLEEDING50.80.810.60.91000PATCHING50.30.610.60.81000SURFACE DISINTEGRATION OR DEBONDING50.30.610.60.81000RUTTING100.30.710.60.81*000MAP CRACKING50.20.610.40.81000BASE FAILURE10xx0.60.810.70.91*0.60.74.2SETTLEMENTS50.40.710.60.81000TRANSVERSE CRACKS100.40.710.50.71*000WHEEL TRACK CRACKING150.40.710.50.71*000LONGITUDUNAL CRACKING50.20.610.40.81*000EDGE CRACKING5xx0.40.710.50.71*0.40.51PRESSURE DAMAGE/UPHEAVEL50.40.610.50.81000CRACK SEALING DEFICIENCY51110.50.81000TOTAL DEDUCT =5.21L = LOW2O = OCCASIONALSUM OF STRUCTURAL DEDUCT (∗) = 5.2 M = MEDIUM F = FREQUENT100- TOTAL DEDUCT = PCR =94.8 H = HIGH E = EXTENSIVE3DEDUCT POINTS = DISTRESS WEIGHT X SEVERITY WT. X EXTENT WT.REMARKS:test at mile 1.8minor edge cracking - just starting to developsurfside 3MAX-2005112.00
TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM
Update of the Nantucket Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan
Appendix E – Madaket Road Section PCR
Section:Madaket Road 1Date:8/25/2005Log mile:0to0.9Rated by:MDEDescription: Ames Ave to South Cambridge St# of Utility Cuts:11LOCALPAVEMENT CONDITION RATING FORMDISTRESSDISTRESSSEVERITY*EXTENT2SEVERITYEXTENTSEVERITYEXTENTDEDUCTWEIGHTLMHOFELMHOFEPOINTS3RAVELING10xx0.30.610.50.810.30.51.5BLEEDING50.80.810.60.91000PATCHING50.30.610.60.81000SURFACE DISINTEGRATION OR DEBONDING50.30.610.60.81000RUTTING100.30.710.60.81*000MAP CRACKING50.20.610.40.81000BASE FAILURE10xx0.60.810.70.91*0.60.74.2SETTLEMENTS5xx0.40.710.60.810.40.61.2TRANSVERSE CRACKS10xx0.40.710.50.71*0.70.53.5WHEEL TRACK CRACKING150.40.710.50.71*000LONGITUDUNAL CRACKING50.20.610.40.81*000EDGE CRACKING50.40.710.50.71*000PRESSURE DAMAGE/UPHEAVEL50.40.610.50.81000CRACK SEALING DEFICIENCY51110.50.81000TOTAL DEDUCT =10.41L = LOW2O = OCCASIONALSUM OF STRUCTURAL DEDUCT (∗) = 7.7 M = MEDIUM F = FREQUENT100- TOTAL DEDUCT = PCR =89.6 H = HIGH E = EXTENSIVE3DEDUCT POINTS = DISTRESS WEIGHT X SEVERITY WT. X EXTENT WT.REMARKS:Test at I Streetjoint between road and path raveling, patch at mile 0.6settlement at driveways, DMH at I street poor patchSettlement at mile 0.3 24' long x 3' wideAppears that road has been overlayed, but not path leading to minor edge crackingMadaket 1MAX-2005112.00
Section:Madaket Road 2Date:8/25/2005Log mile:0.9to2Rated by:MDEDescription: South Cambridge St to Parking Area (Pier)# of Utility Cuts:LOCALPAVEMENT CONDITION RATING FORMDISTRESSDISTRESSSEVERITY*EXTENT2SEVERITYEXTENTSEVERITYEXTENTDEDUCTWEIGHTLMHOFELMHOFEPOINTS3RAVELING10xx0.30.610.50.810.30.51.5BLEEDING50.80.810.60.91000PATCHING50.30.610.60.81000SURFACE DISINTEGRATION OR DEBONDING50.30.610.60.81000RUTTING100.30.710.60.81*000MAP CRACKING50.20.610.40.81000BASE FAILURE10xx0.60.810.70.91*0.60.95.4SETTLEMENTS5xx0.40.710.60.810.40.61.2TRANSVERSE CRACKS10xx0.40.710.50.71*0.40.52WHEEL TRACK CRACKING150.40.710.50.71*000LONGITUDUNAL CRACKING50.20.610.40.81*000EDGE CRACKING5xx0.40.710.50.71*0.70.72.45PRESSURE DAMAGE/UPHEAVEL50.40.610.50.81000CRACK SEALING DEFICIENCY51110.50.81000TOTAL DEDUCT =12.551L = LOW2O = OCCASIONALSUM OF STRUCTURAL DEDUCT (∗) = 9.85 M = MEDIUM F = FREQUENT100- TOTAL DEDUCT = PCR =87.5 H = HIGH E = EXTENSIVE3DEDUCT POINTS = DISTRESS WEIGHT X SEVERITY WT. X EXTENT WT.REMARKS:Mile 1.6 settlemant cracks follow roadway cracks adjacent to roadMH at mile 1.3; culvert at mile 1.6; mile 1.8 root upheaval; patch at mile 1.9; settlement at mile 1.9; MH at 1.9Madaket 2MAX-2005112.00
Section:Madaket Road 3Date:8/25/2005Log mile:2to3.2Rated by:MDEDescription: Pier Parking Area to 160 Madaket Rd# of Utility Cuts:LOCALPAVEMENT CONDITION RATING FORMDISTRESSDISTRESSSEVERITY*EXTENT2SEVERITYEXTENTSEVERITYEXTENTDEDUCTWEIGHTLMHOFELMHOFEPOINTS3RAVELING10xx0.30.610.50.810.30.51.5BLEEDING50.80.810.60.91000PATCHING50.30.610.60.81000SURFACE DISINTEGRATION OR DEBONDING5xx0.30.610.60.810.30.60.9RUTTING100.30.710.60.81*000MAP CRACKING50.20.610.40.81000BASE FAILURE10xx0.60.810.70.91*0.60.95.4SETTLEMENTS5xx0.40.710.60.810.40.61.2TRANSVERSE CRACKS10xx0.40.710.50.71*0.40.52WHEEL TRACK CRACKING150.40.710.50.71*000LONGITUDUNAL CRACKING50.20.610.40.81*000EDGE CRACKING5xx0.40.710.50.71*0.40.51PRESSURE DAMAGE/UPHEAVEL5xx0.40.610.50.810.40.51CRACK SEALING DEFICIENCY51110.50.81000TOTAL DEDUCT =131L = LOW2O = OCCASIONALSUM OF STRUCTURAL DEDUCT (∗) = 8.4 M = MEDIUM F = FREQUENT100- TOTAL DEDUCT = PCR =87 H = HIGH E = EXTENSIVE3DEDUCT POINTS = DISTRESS WEIGHT X SEVERITY WT. X EXTENT WT.REMARKS:debonding at DPW mile 2.2; MH at mile 2.0; root upheaval at mile 2.6minor base failure along edgesMadaket 3MAX-2005112.00
Section:Madaket Road 4Date:8/25/2005Log mile:3.2to4Rated by:MDEDescription: 160 Madaket Rd to Mile 4.0# of Utility Cuts:LOCALPAVEMENT CONDITION RATING FORMDISTRESSDISTRESSSEVERITY*EXTENT2SEVERITYEXTENTSEVERITYEXTENTDEDUCTWEIGHTLMHOFELMHOFEPOINTS3RAVELING10xx0.30.610.50.810.30.51.5BLEEDING50.80.810.60.91000PATCHING50.30.610.60.81000SURFACE DISINTEGRATION OR DEBONDING50.30.610.60.81000RUTTING100.30.710.60.81*000MAP CRACKING50.20.610.40.81000BASE FAILURE10xx0.60.810.70.91*0.60.74.2SETTLEMENTS50.40.710.60.81000TRANSVERSE CRACKS10xx0.40.710.50.71*0.40.52WHEEL TRACK CRACKING150.40.710.50.71*000LONGITUDUNAL CRACKING50.20.610.40.81*000EDGE CRACKING5xx0.40.710.50.71*0.40.51PRESSURE DAMAGE/UPHEAVEL5xx0.40.610.50.810.60.51.5CRACK SEALING DEFICIENCY51110.50.81000TOTAL DEDUCT =10.21L = LOW2O = OCCASIONALSUM OF STRUCTURAL DEDUCT (∗) = 7.2 M = MEDIUM F = FREQUENT100- TOTAL DEDUCT = PCR =89.8 H = HIGH E = EXTENSIVE3DEDUCT POINTS = DISTRESS WEIGHT X SEVERITY WT. X EXTENT WT.REMARKS:Test at mile 3.6 - Cliff Roadmile 3.2, 3.3, 3.4 tree roots mile 3.4 by drinkin gfountain - edge failure 5' long 4" deep cut and replaceMajor Erosion at Bridge RailingMadaket 4MAX-2005112.00
Section:Madaket Road 5Date:8/25/2005Log mile:4to4.7Rated by:MDEDescription: Bridge at mile 4.0 to 72 Madaket Rd# of Utility Cuts:LOCALPAVEMENT CONDITION RATING FORMDISTRESSDISTRESSSEVERITY*EXTENT2SEVERITYEXTENTSEVERITYEXTENTDEDUCTWEIGHTLMHOFELMHOFEPOINTS3RAVELING10xx0.30.610.50.810.30.51.5BLEEDING50.80.810.60.91000PATCHING50.30.610.60.81000SURFACE DISINTEGRATION OR DEBONDING50.30.610.60.81000RUTTING100.30.710.60.81*000MAP CRACKING50.20.610.40.81000BASE FAILURE10xx0.60.810.70.91*0.60.74.2SETTLEMENTS50.40.710.60.81000TRANSVERSE CRACKS10xx0.40.710.50.71*0.40.52WHEEL TRACK CRACKING150.40.710.50.71*000LONGITUDUNAL CRACKING50.20.610.40.81*000EDGE CRACKING50.40.710.50.71*000PRESSURE DAMAGE/UPHEAVEL5xx0.40.610.50.810.40.51CRACK SEALING DEFICIENCY51110.50.81000TOTAL DEDUCT =8.71L = LOW2O = OCCASIONALSUM OF STRUCTURAL DEDUCT (∗) = 6.2 M = MEDIUM F = FREQUENT100- TOTAL DEDUCT = PCR =91.3 H = HIGH E = EXTENSIVE3DEDUCT POINTS = DISTRESS WEIGHT X SEVERITY WT. X EXTENT WT.REMARKS:test at mile 4.4 Hydrangea Farm4.1 roots 4.3 minor base failure along edgesmadaket 5MAX-2005112.00
Section:Madaket Road 6Date:8/25/2005Log mile:4.7toendRated by:MDEDescrition: 72 Madaket Rd to End# of Utility Cuts:1LOCALPAVEMENT CONDITION RATING FORMDISTRESSDISTRESSSEVERITY*EXTENT2SEVERITYEXTENTSEVERITYEXTENTDEDUCTWEIGHTLMHOFELMHOFEPOINTS3RAVELING10xx0.30.610.50.810.30.51.5BLEEDING50.80.810.60.91000PATCHING50.30.610.60.81000SURFACE DISINTEGRATION OR DEBONDING50.30.610.60.81000RUTTING100.30.710.60.81*000MAP CRACKING50.20.610.40.81000BASE FAILURE10xx0.60.810.70.91*0.60.74.2SETTLEMENTS50.40.710.60.81000TRANSVERSE CRACKS10xx0.40.710.50.71*0.40.52WHEEL TRACK CRACKING150.40.710.50.71*000LONGITUDUNAL CRACKING50.20.610.40.81*000EDGE CRACKING5xx0.40.710.50.71*0.40.51PRESSURE DAMAGE/UPHEAVEL50.40.610.50.81000CRACK SEALING DEFICIENCY51110.50.81000TOTAL DEDUCT =8.71L = LOW2O = OCCASIONALSUM OF STRUCTURAL DEDUCT (∗) = 7.2 M = MEDIUM F = FREQUENT100- TOTAL DEDUCT = PCR =91.3 H = HIGH E = EXTENSIVE3DEDUCT POINTS = DISTRESS WEIGHT X SEVERITY WT. X EXTENT WT.REMARKS:poor joint with existing pavementtest at mile 5.2 mile 5.2 to end looks newpoor utility patch at #70mile 5.0 MH and CB at mile 5.1madaket 6MAX-2005112.00
TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM
Update of the Nantucket Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan
Appendix F – Cliff Road Section PCR
Section:Cliff Road 1Date:8/25/2005Log mile:0to1.2Rated by:MDEDescription: Madaket Road to End# of Utility Cuts:2LOCALPAVEMENT CONDITION RATING FORMDISTRESSDISTRESSSEVERITY*EXTENT2SEVERITYEXTENTSEVERITYEXTENTDEDUCTWEIGHTLMHOFELMHOFEPOINTS3RAVELING10xx0.30.610.50.810.30.51.5BLEEDING50.80.810.60.91000PATCHING50.30.610.60.81000SURFACE DISINTEGRATION OR DEBONDING50.30.610.60.81000RUTTING100.30.710.60.81*000MAP CRACKING50.20.610.40.81000BASE FAILURE10xx0.60.810.70.91*0.60.74.2SETTLEMENTS50.40.710.60.81000TRANSVERSE CRACKS10xx0.40.710.50.71*0.40.52WHEEL TRACK CRACKING150.40.710.50.71*000LONGITUDUNAL CRACKING50.20.610.40.81*000EDGE CRACKING5xx0.40.710.50.71*0.40.51PRESSURE DAMAGE/UPHEAVEL50.40.610.50.81000CRACK SEALING DEFICIENCY51110.50.81000TOTAL DEDUCT =8.71L = LOW2O = OCCASIONALSUM OF STRUCTURAL DEDUCT (∗) = 7.2 M = MEDIUM F = FREQUENT100- TOTAL DEDUCT = PCR =91.3 H = HIGH E = EXTENSIVE3DEDUCT POINTS = DISTRESS WEIGHT X SEVERITY WT. X EXTENT WT.REMARKS:test at mile 0.6 mile 0.4 utility patch (settled)mile 1.1 utility patch; mile 0.3 overlay at deacons way debondingCopy of Cliff road 1MAX-2005112.00
TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM
Update of the Nantucket Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan
Appendix G – Polpis Road Section PCR
Section:Polpis Road 1Date:8/25/2005Log mile:0to0.9Rated by:MDEDescription: Milestone Road to Kelly Road# of Utility Cuts:1LOCALPAVEMENT CONDITION RATING FORMDISTRESSDISTRESSSEVERITY*EXTENT2SEVERITYEXTENTSEVERITYEXTENTDEDUCTWEIGHTLMHOFELMHOFEPOINTS3RAVELING100.30.610.50.81000BLEEDING50.80.810.60.91000PATCHING50.30.610.60.81000SURFACE DISINTEGRATION OR DEBONDING50.30.610.60.81000RUTTING100.30.710.60.81*000MAP CRACKING50.20.610.40.81000BASE FAILURE10xx0.60.810.70.91*0.60.74.2SETTLEMENTS50.40.710.60.81000TRANSVERSE CRACKS100.40.710.50.71*000WHEEL TRACK CRACKING150.40.710.50.71*000LONGITUDUNAL CRACKING50.20.610.40.81*000EDGE CRACKING50.40.710.50.71*000PRESSURE DAMAGE/UPHEAVEL5xx0.40.610.50.810.40.51CRACK SEALING DEFICIENCY51110.50.81000TOTAL DEDUCT =5.21L = LOW2O = OCCASIONALSUM OF STRUCTURAL DEDUCT (∗) = 4.2 M = MEDIUM F = FREQUENT100- TOTAL DEDUCT = PCR =94.8 H = HIGH E = EXTENSIVE3DEDUCT POINTS = DISTRESS WEIGHT X SEVERITY WT. X EXTENT WT.REMARKS:generally very goodtest at mile 0.5mile 0.2 patch utility; mile 0.6 minor upheaval minor base failures along edgesPolpis 1MAX-2005112.00
Section:Polpis Road 2Date:8/25/2005Log mile:0.9to2Rated by:MDEDescription: Kelley Road to Topgate Lane# of Utility Cuts:1LOCALPAVEMENT CONDITION RATING FORMDISTRESSDISTRESSSEVERITY*EXTENT2SEVERITYEXTENTSEVERITYEXTENTDEDUCTWEIGHTLMHOFELMHOFEPOINTS3RAVELING10xx0.30.610.50.810.30.51.5BLEEDING50.80.810.60.91000PATCHING5xx0.30.610.60.810.30.60.9SURFACE DISINTEGRATION OR DEBONDING50.30.610.60.81000RUTTING100.30.710.60.81*000MAP CRACKING50.20.610.40.81000BASE FAILURE10xx0.60.810.70.91*0.60.74.2SETTLEMENTS50.40.710.60.81000TRANSVERSE CRACKS100.40.710.50.71*000WHEEL TRACK CRACKING150.40.710.50.71*000LONGITUDUNAL CRACKING50.20.610.40.81*000EDGE CRACKING50.40.710.50.71*000PRESSURE DAMAGE/UPHEAVEL5xx0.40.610.50.810.40.51CRACK SEALING DEFICIENCY51110.50.81000TOTAL DEDUCT =7.61L = LOW2O = OCCASIONALSUM OF STRUCTURAL DEDUCT (∗) = 4.2 M = MEDIUM F = FREQUENT100- TOTAL DEDUCT = PCR =92.4 H = HIGH E = EXTENSIVE3DEDUCT POINTS = DISTRESS WEIGHT X SEVERITY WT. X EXTENT WT.REMARKS:test at mile 1.5hump at cross road mile 1.0utility trench at mile 1.6 not very good patchPolpis 2MAX-2005112.00
Section:Polpis Road 3Date:8/25/2005Log mile:2to2.9Rated by:MDEDescription: Topgate Lane to Quase Road# of Utility Cuts:LOCALPAVEMENT CONDITION RATING FORMDISTRESSDISTRESSSEVERITY*EXTENT2SEVERITYEXTENTSEVERITYEXTENTDEDUCTWEIGHTLMHOFELMHOFEPOINTS3RAVELING100.30.610.50.81000BLEEDING50.80.810.60.91000PATCHING50.30.610.60.81000SURFACE DISINTEGRATION OR DEBONDING50.30.610.60.81000RUTTING100.30.710.60.81*000MAP CRACKING50.20.610.40.81000BASE FAILURE10xx0.60.810.70.91*0.60.74.2SETTLEMENTS50.40.710.60.81000TRANSVERSE CRACKS100.40.710.50.71*000WHEEL TRACK CRACKING150.40.710.50.71*000LONGITUDUNAL CRACKING50.20.610.40.81*000EDGE CRACKING5xx0.40.710.50.71*0.40.51PRESSURE DAMAGE/UPHEAVEL50.40.610.50.81000CRACK SEALING DEFICIENCY51110.50.81000TOTAL DEDUCT =5.21L = LOW2O = OCCASIONALSUM OF STRUCTURAL DEDUCT (∗) = 5.2 M = MEDIUM F = FREQUENT100- TOTAL DEDUCT = PCR =94.8 H = HIGH E = EXTENSIVE3DEDUCT POINTS = DISTRESS WEIGHT X SEVERITY WT. X EXTENT WT.REMARKS:test at mile 2.5mile 2.3 new pavementmile 2.35 new patch - good conditionmile 2.5 poor top course joint photoPolpis 3MAX-2005112.00
Section:Polpis Road 4Date:8/25/2005Log mile:2.8to4.1Rated by:MDEDescription: Quase Rd to 275 Polpis Road# of Utility Cuts:LOCALPAVEMENT CONDITION RATING FORMDISTRESSDISTRESSSEVERITY*EXTENT2SEVERITYEXTENTSEVERITYEXTENTDEDUCTWEIGHTLMHOFELMHOFEPOINTS3RAVELING100.30.610.50.81000BLEEDING50.80.810.60.91000PATCHING5xx0.30.610.60.810.30.60.9SURFACE DISINTEGRATION OR DEBONDING50.30.610.60.81000RUTTING100.30.710.60.81*000MAP CRACKING50.20.610.40.81000BASE FAILURE10xx0.60.810.70.91*0.60.74.2SETTLEMENTS50.40.710.60.81000TRANSVERSE CRACKS100.40.710.50.71*000WHEEL TRACK CRACKING150.40.710.50.71*000LONGITUDUNAL CRACKING50.20.610.40.81*000EDGE CRACKING50.40.710.50.71*000PRESSURE DAMAGE/UPHEAVEL50.40.610.50.81000CRACK SEALING DEFICIENCY51110.50.81000TOTAL DEDUCT =5.11L = LOW2O = OCCASIONALSUM OF STRUCTURAL DEDUCT (∗) = 4.2 M = MEDIUM F = FREQUENT100- TOTAL DEDUCT = PCR =94.9 H = HIGH E = EXTENSIVE3DEDUCT POINTS = DISTRESS WEIGHT X SEVERITY WT. X EXTENT WT.REMARKS:test at mile 3.5patch at mile 3.2Polpis 4MAX-2005112.00
Section:Polpis Road 5Date:8/25/2005Log mile:4.1to5Rated by:MDEDescription: 275 Polpis Road to 315 Polpis Road# of Utility Cuts:1LOCALPAVEMENT CONDITION RATING FORMDISTRESSDISTRESSSEVERITY*EXTENT2SEVERITYEXTENTSEVERITYEXTENTDEDUCTWEIGHTLMHOFELMHOFEPOINTS3RAVELING100.30.610.50.81000BLEEDING50.80.810.60.91000PATCHING5xx0.30.610.60.810.30.60.9SURFACE DISINTEGRATION OR DEBONDING50.30.610.60.81000RUTTING100.30.710.60.81*000MAP CRACKING50.20.610.40.81000BASE FAILURE10xx0.60.810.70.91*0.60.74.2SETTLEMENTS50.40.710.60.81000TRANSVERSE CRACKS10xx0.40.710.50.71*0.40.52WHEEL TRACK CRACKING150.40.710.50.71*000LONGITUDUNAL CRACKING50.20.610.40.81*000EDGE CRACKING50.40.710.50.71*000PRESSURE DAMAGE/UPHEAVEL50.40.610.50.81000CRACK SEALING DEFICIENCY51110.50.81000TOTAL DEDUCT =7.11L = LOW2O = OCCASIONALSUM OF STRUCTURAL DEDUCT (∗) = 6.2 M = MEDIUM F = FREQUENT100- TOTAL DEDUCT = PCR =92.9 H = HIGH E = EXTENSIVE3DEDUCT POINTS = DISTRESS WEIGHT X SEVERITY WT. X EXTENT WT.REMARKS:test at mile 4.6mile 4.2 transverse crack patches drain trench needs to redoneminor upheavel from tree rootsovergrown vegetationPolpis 5MAX-2005112.00
Section:Polpis Road 6Date:8/25/2005Log mile:5to6.1Rated by:MDEDescription:315 Polpis Road to End of G.R Run# of Utility Cuts:LOCALPAVEMENT CONDITION RATING FORMDISTRESSDISTRESSSEVERITY*EXTENT2SEVERITYEXTENTSEVERITYEXTENTDEDUCTWEIGHTLMHOFELMHOFEPOINTS3RAVELING10xx0.30.610.50.810.30.51.5BLEEDING50.80.810.60.91000PATCHING50.30.610.60.81000SURFACE DISINTEGRATION OR DEBONDING50.30.610.60.81000RUTTING100.30.710.60.81*000MAP CRACKING50.20.610.40.81000BASE FAILURE10xx0.60.810.70.91*0.60.74.2SETTLEMENTS50.40.710.60.81000TRANSVERSE CRACKS100.40.710.50.71*000WHEEL TRACK CRACKING150.40.710.50.71*000LONGITUDUNAL CRACKING50.20.610.40.81*000EDGE CRACKING50.40.710.50.71*000PRESSURE DAMAGE/UPHEAVEL5xx0.40.610.50.810.40.51CRACK SEALING DEFICIENCY51110.50.81000TOTAL DEDUCT =6.71L = LOW2O = OCCASIONALSUM OF STRUCTURAL DEDUCT (∗) = 4.2 M = MEDIUM F = FREQUENT100- TOTAL DEDUCT = PCR =93.3 H = HIGH E = EXTENSIVE3DEDUCT POINTS = DISTRESS WEIGHT X SEVERITY WT. X EXTENT WT.REMARKS:test at mile 5.55.3 transverse construction jointsPolpis 6MAX-2005112.00
Section:Polpis Road 7Date:8/25/2005Log mile:6.1to7Rated by:MDEDescription: Mile 6.1 to mile 7.0# of Utility Cuts:LOCALPAVEMENT CONDITION RATING FORMDISTRESSDISTRESSSEVERITY*EXTENT2SEVERITYEXTENTSEVERITYEXTENTDEDUCTWEIGHTLMHOFELMHOFEPOINTS3RAVELING10xx0.30.610.50.810.30.51.5BLEEDING50.80.810.60.91000PATCHING50.30.610.60.81000SURFACE DISINTEGRATION OR DEBONDING50.30.610.60.81000RUTTING100.30.710.60.81*000MAP CRACKING50.20.610.40.81000BASE FAILURE10 x x0.60.810.70.91*0.80.75.6SETTLEMENTS5 0.40.710.60.81000TRANSVERSE CRACKS100.40.710.50.71*000WHEEL TRACK CRACKING150.40.710.50.71*000LONGITUDUNAL CRACKING50.20.610.40.81*000EDGE CRACKING5xx0.40.710.50.71*0.40.51PRESSURE DAMAGE/UPHEAVEL50.40.610.50.81000CRACK SEALING DEFICIENCY51110.50.81000TOTAL DEDUCT =8.11L = LOW2O = OCCASIONALSUM OF STRUCTURAL DEDUCT (∗) = 6.6 M = MEDIUM F = FREQUENT100- TOTAL DEDUCT = PCR =91.9 H = HIGH E = EXTENSIVE3DEDUCT POINTS = DISTRESS WEIGHT X SEVERITY WT. X EXTENT WT.REMARKS:test at mile 6.5 mile 6.2 base failure - area of concern should rebuild sectionlocalized moderate ravelling at mile 6.6overgrown vegetationPolpis 7MAX-2005112.00
Section:Polpis Road 8Date:8/25/2005Log mile:7to8.2Rated by:MDEDesription: Mile 7 to Eldridge Lane# of Utility Cuts:LOCALPAVEMENT CONDITION RATING FORMDISTRESSDISTRESSSEVERITY*EXTENT2SEVERITYEXTENTSEVERITYEXTENTDEDUCTWEIGHTLMHOFELMHOFEPOINTS3RAVELING10xx0.30.610.50.810.30.51.5BLEEDING50.80.810.60.91000PATCHING50.30.610.60.81000SURFACE DISINTEGRATION OR DEBONDING50.30.610.60.81000RUTTING100.30.710.60.81*000MAP CRACKING50.20.610.40.81000BASE FAILURE10 xx0.60.810.70.91*10.77SETTLEMENTS50.40.710.60.81000TRANSVERSE CRACKS100.40.710.50.71*000WHEEL TRACK CRACKING150.40.710.50.71*000LONGITUDUNAL CRACKING50.20.610.40.81*000EDGE CRACKING5xx0.40.710.50.71*0.40.51PRESSURE DAMAGE/UPHEAVEL50.40.610.50.81000CRACK SEALING DEFICIENCY51110.50.81000TOTAL DEDUCT =9.51L = LOW2O = OCCASIONALSUM OF STRUCTURAL DEDUCT (∗) = 8 M = MEDIUM F = FREQUENT100- TOTAL DEDUCT = PCR =90.5 H = HIGH E = EXTENSIVE3DEDUCT POINTS = DISTRESS WEIGHT X SEVERITY WT. X EXTENT WT.REMARKS:test at mile 7.6localized base failure mile 7.0Polpis 8MAX-2005112.00
TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM
Update of the Nantucket Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan
Appendix H – Eel Point Road Section PCR
Section:Eel Point Road 1Date:8/25/2005Log mile:0to0.9Rated by:MDEDescription: Madaket Road to End# of Utility Cuts:LOCALPAVEMENT CONDITION RATING FORMDISTRESSDISTRESSSEVERITY*EXTENT2SEVERITYEXTENTSEVERITYEXTENTDEDUCTWEIGHTLMHOFELMHOFEPOINTS3RAVELING100.30.610.50.81000BLEEDING50.80.810.60.91000PATCHING50.30.610.60.81000SURFACE DISINTEGRATION OR DEBONDING50.30.610.60.81000RUTTING100.30.710.60.81*000MAP CRACKING50.20.610.40.81000BASE FAILURE100.60.810.70.91*000SETTLEMENTS50.40.710.60.81000TRANSVERSE CRACKS100.40.710.50.71*000WHEEL TRACK CRACKING150.40.710.50.71*000LONGITUDUNAL CRACKING50.20.610.40.81*000EDGE CRACKING5xx0.40.710.50.71*0.40.51PRESSURE DAMAGE/UPHEAVEL50.40.610.50.81000CRACK SEALING DEFICIENCY51110.50.81000TOTAL DEDUCT =11L = LOW2O = OCCASIONALSUM OF STRUCTURAL DEDUCT (∗) = 1 M = MEDIUM F = FREQUENT100- TOTAL DEDUCT = PCR =99 H = HIGH E = EXTENSIVE3DEDUCT POINTS = DISTRESS WEIGHT X SEVERITY WT. X EXTENT WT.REMARKS:Test at North Swift RockVery minor edge cracking where shoulder is not built upEel point road 1MAX-2005112.00
Greenman-Pedersen, Inc.
GPI
Quality Engineering Services
Through Continuous Improvement