HomeMy WebLinkAbout011-95 tau MF>, TOWN OF NANTUCKET
• A BOARD OF APPEALS
-400RA1I' NANTUCKET, MASSACHUSETTS 02554
Date: cr0 , 1996
To: Parties in Interest and. Others concerned with the
Decision of the BOARD OF APPEALS in the Application of the
following:
Application No. : 011-96
Owner/Applicant: RICHARD GORDON GRUNDLER, FOR HIMSELF
AS OWNER AND FOR RONALD AND STEPHANIE WASHBURN
Enclosed is the Decision of the BOARD OF APPEALS which has
this day been filed in the office of the Nantucket Town
Clerk.
An Appeal from this Decision may be taken pursuant to
Section 17 of Chapter 40A, Massachusetts General Laws .
Any action appealing the Decision must be brought by
filing an complaint in court within TWENTY ( 20) days after
this day ' s date . Notice of the action with a copy of the
complaint and certified copy of the Decision must be given
to the Town Clerk so as to be received within such TWENTY
(20) days .
1`
Micgrael J. O'Mara . ilairman
cc: Town Clerk
Planning Board
Building Commissioner
PLEASE NOTE: MOST SPECIAL PERMITS AND VARIANCES HAVE A TIME
LIMIT AND WILL EXPIRE IF NOT ACTED UPON ACCORDING- TO NANTUCKET
ZONING BY-LAW §139-30I ( SPECIAL PERMITS) ; §139-32I (VARIANCES)
ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE CALL THE NANTUCKET ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS .
s
o`��NTUCMf� TOWN OF NANTUCKET
kJ
BOARD OF APPEALS
41%01°' NANTUCKET, MASSACHUSETTS 02554
A_sessor ' s Map 42 .4 . 2 One Ash Street
Parcel 85 Deed Ref . 296/185
ROH
At a Public Hearing of the Nantucket Zoning Board of Appeals ,
held at 1 : 00 P.M. , Friday, March 8 , 1996 , in the Selectmen' s Meeting
Room, Broad Street, Nantucket, MA, on the Application of RICHARD GORDON
GRUNDLER, FOR HIMSELF AS OWNER AND FOR RONALD AND STEPHANIE WASHBURN,
OF R.D. , #1 , Box 1215 , Shelburne, VT 05482 and 44-52 Route 9W, New
Windsor, NY 12553 , respectively, Board of Appeals File No. 011-96 , the
Board made the following Decision:
1 . Applicants are seeking a SPECIAL PERMIT under Nantucket Zoning
By-Law §139-8B(2) (neighborhood service establishments) . Applicants
propose to convert 655+ square feet of a said to be pre-existing
single-family dwelling into a repair shop for furniture and other
antiques with no exterior changes planned . There would also be retail
sales associated with this use , and the remainder of the structure
would be used by the Applicants (the Washburns) as their year-round
residence . The Locus is non-conforming as to lot size, having a lot
area of 2 , 263+ square feet in a district that requires a minimum lot
size of 5 ,000 square feet , and as to side and rear yard setbacks , with
a gazebo being sited less than one ( 1 ) foot from the southwesterly side
yard lot line at its closest point, and the principal dwelling being
sited 3 . 95+ feet at its closest point to the rear yard lot line and
4 . 27+ feet at its closest point from the northerly side yard lot line
in a district that requires a minimum side and rear yard setback of
five ( 5 ) feet, and as to ground cover ratio , having a ratio of 52+% in
a district that has a maximum ground cover ratio requirement of 50%.
Applicants further seek a SPECIAL PERMIT under Nantucket Zoning
By-Law §139-18D to waive four (4) of the required five ( 5) parking
spaces as one ( 1 ) space is provided on site . In addition and to the
extent necessary, SPECIAL PERMIT relief is sought under Zoning By-Law
§139-20C, to waive any loading zone requirements .
The premises is located at ONE ASH STREET, Assessor ' s Map
42 .4 . 2 , Parcel 85 , Deed Ref . 296/185 . The property is zoned
Residential-Old-Historic.
2 . The Decision is based upon the Application and materials
submitted with it and testimony and evidence presented at the Public
Hearing. There was no Planning Board recommendation. There were several
abutters present to speak in opposition with one ( 1 ) speaking in favor .
There were seven (7) letters in opposition and one ( 1 ) in favor of
relief on file. Neighbors were concerned about the increase in traffic,
r
noise and exacerbation of a difficult parking situation with the
placement of a furniture repair business and antique store in a small
structure previously used as a single family dwelling and requiring only
one ( 1 ) parking space; placement of a commercial enterprise in a
residential zone; use of hazardous materials in furniture restoration;
possible compromise of the historical integrity of the property; and the
setting of a negative precedent .
3 . Applicants, through counsel , represented that the proposed
antique shop and furniture repair business falls under Zoning By-Law
§139-8B( 2) as a neighborhood service establishment . Applicants intended
to operate a low-key business as they will live in the structure as
year-round residents . Hours and days would be limited and no changes
were proposed for the exterior of the structure . The property currently
has one ( 1 ) parking space and that would be maintained. There would be
no deliveries to the site and any transportation of furniture would be
done by the Applicants . No power tools would be used on the premises
with all repairs being done by hand and no chemical stripping of items
would be done on site in the 10 ' x 12 ' basement space. It was pointed
out that there had been a small shop located in the basement but that
the use had ceased more than three (3 ) years prior to the hearing date .
4 . A majority of Board members expressed concern about allowing a
commercial use in a residential district and setting a precedent . A
majority of the Board found that the proposed use did not fall within
the scope of §139-8B( 2) and that the use would not be such as to
provide a service to the neighborhood . The furniture/repair shop would
be substantially more detrimental to the neighborhood than the
permitted alternative uses or existing single family dwelling use . The
increased traffic and pressure on the parking situation would be
exacerbated by the placement of a commercial enterprise in the
structure and would be substantially more detrimental to the
neighborhood than the present use.
5 . Accordingly, upon a motion made and seconded to grant relief
subject to several conditions , two (2 ) members voted in favor (Williams
and Hourihan) and three ( 3) in opposition (O 'Mara, Angelastro and
Sevrens) . The requested relief by SPECIAL PERMIT is hereby DENIED as a
vote of at least four (4) in favor is needed to carry a grant of
relief . o
Dated: �JCy , ) 0?9
� J ►�� 41 1 al/ /.401 if /AI
ind F . Wil iams _
William Hourihan ichael Ange a .�o
RECEIVED Nancy Sevre �.
TOWN CLERK'S OFFICE
NANTUCKET MA 02554
JUL 021996
TIME:
CLERK: /
oEaoTUCMe), TOWN OF NANTUCKET
ki
=� f- BOARD OF APPEALS
cPORA1E 9. NANTUCKET, MASSACHUSETTS 02554
NOTICE
A Public Hearing of the NANTUCKET ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
will be held at 1 :00 P.M. , FRIDAY, MARCH 8 , 1996, in the
Selectmen ' s Meeting Room, Town and County Building, Broad Street,
Nantucket, Massachusetts , on the Application of the following:
RICHARD GORDON GRUNDLER, FOR HIMSELF AS OWNER AND FOR RONALD AND
STEPHANIE WASHBURN
BOARD OF APPEALS FILE NO. 011-96
Applicants are seeking a SPECIAL PERMIT under Nantucket
Zoning By-Law §139-8B( 2 ) (neighborhood service establishments) .
Applicants propose to convert 655+ square feet of a said to be
pre-existing single-family dwelling into a repair shop for
furniture and other antiques with no exterior changes planned .
There would also be retail sales associated with this use, and the
remainder of the structure would be used by the Applicants ( the
Grundlers) as their year-round residence. The Locus is
non-conforming as to lot size, having a lot area of 2 , 263+ square
feet in a district that requires a minimum lot size of 5, 000
square feet, and as to side and rear yard setbacks, with a gazebo
being sited less than one ( 1 ) foot from the southwesterly side
yard lot line at its closest point, and the principal dwelling
being sited 3 . 95+ feet at its closest point to the rear yard lot
line and 4 . 27+ feet at its closest point from the northerly side
yard lot line in a district that requires a minimum side and rear
yard setback of five ( 5) feet, and as to ground cover ratio,
having a ratio of 52+% in a district that has a maximum ground
cover ratio requirement of 50%.
Applicants further seek a SPECIAL PERMIT under Nantucket
Zoning By-Law §139-18D to waive four (4) of the required five ( 5 )
parking spaces as one ( 1 ) space is provided on site . In addition
and to the extent necessary , SPECIAL PERMIT relief is sought under
Zoning By-Law §139-20C, to waive any loading space requirements .
The premises is located at ONE ASH STREET, Assessor ' s Map
42 . 4 . 2 , Parcel 85 , Deed Ref . 296/185 . The property is zoned
Residential-Old-Historic .
i144 c ri-O i716t1c�
chael J. O 'Mara , Chairman
BoA Form 1-89 NANTUCKET ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
TOWN AND COUNTY BUILDING Date
NANTUCKET, MA 02554 Cif-
APPLICATION
Case No.
FOR RELIEF
Owner's name(s) : Richard Gordon Grundler
Mailing address: R.D. #1, Box 1215, Shelburne, VT 05482
Applicant's Name:Ronald and Stephanie Washburn
Mailing Address: 44-52 Route 9W, New Windsor, NY 12553
Location of Lot: Assessor's map and parcel number 42 .4.2 - 85
Street Address: One Ash Street
Registry Land Ct Plan, Plan Bk & Pg or Plan File no recorded plan
Date lot acquired: 04/01/88 Deed Ref 296, 185 Zoning district ROH
Uses on lot - commercial: None or dwelling MCD? no
- number of: dwellings 1 duplex_ apartments rental rods_
Building date(s) : all pre-8/72? ves or C of O?N/A
Building Permit appl'n. Nos. N/A
Case Nos. all BoA applications, lawsuits: (061-95)
State fully all zoning relief sought and respective Code sectic-s
and subsections, specifically what you propose compared to present
and what grounds you urge for BoA to make each finding per Sect:on
139-32A _ if Variance, 139-30A x if a Special Permit (and 139-33A
x if to alter or extend a nonconforming use) . If appeal per 139-31A
& B , attach decision or orders appealed. OK to attach addendum2.
See Addendum A attached.
Items enclosed as part of this Application: order'-_ addendum2 x
Locus map x Site plan x showing present x +planned_ structures
Floor plans present_ proposed_ elevations_ (HDC approved?_)
Listings lot area x frontage x setbacks x GCR x parking data
Assessor-certified addressee list 4 sets x mailing labels 2 sets x
$200 fee payable to Town of Nantucket x proof3_'cap' covenant
(If an appeal, ask Town Clerk to send Bldg Comr's record to Brea. )
I certify that the requested information submitted is substantially
complete and true to the best of my knowledge, under the pains and
penalties of perjury. I /
SIGNATURE:
(applicants) onald Washburn St-phanie Washburn
3(If not owner or owner's attorney, enclose proof of authority',
FOR BoA OFFICE USE
Application copies rec'd: 4 L// or_ for BoA on ±/IL/Z(by
One copy filed with Town Clerk on- / R-1-437 (_l" comple•w?----
One copy each to Planning Bd and Building Dept Jj by // -
$200 fee check given Town Treasurer on (/ Aylyaived'
Hearing notice posted A��mailed7�l(Sd&M?/22/Z.),. Z/c-? Yl '
Hearing(s) on_/_/_ cont'd to_/_/_, _/_/_ withdrawn?_/__/_
Decision due by / /_ made_/_/_ filed TC_/_/_ mailed_/__/_
See related cases lawsuits other
Jan96/WashBOA
ADDENDUM TO ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS APPLICATION
RONALD AND STEPHANIE WASHBURN
The Applicants seek a Special Permit for a neighborhood
service establishment under Section 139-8 .B . (2) of the Nantucket
Zoning By-Law to permit their proposed use of a portion of the
structure situated at One Ash Street as a repair shop for
furniture and other antiques . There would also be retail sales
associated with this use, and the remainder of the structure
would be used by the Applicants as their year-round residence .
The property is situated in the ROH zone and a 2, 263 square
foot lot containing 1, 188 square feet of grandfathered structures
according to the plot plan submitted in a prior application
regarding the property (a copy of which is attached) , for a
ground cover ratio of 52% . The existing structures do not comply
with side yard setback requirements . One off-street parking
space is provided on the lot . No exterior changes to the
structures on the lot are proposed.
The change of use would be confined to the three front rooms
in the main house, so that a total of approximately 655 square
feet of floor area would be dedicated to that use . Using the
parking requirement of one space for each 200 square feet of
gross floor area from Section 139-18 .D. , and the requirement of
one space for three employees, an additional 4 parking spaces
would be required. As it is impossible to provide additional
parking spaces on-site, a waiver under Section 139-18 .B. for
those 4 spaces is requested. In addition, to the extent
necessary, a waiver of any loading space requirement pursuant to
Section 139-20 .C. is requested.
The Applicants believe that since they will be living on the
property, its present residential character will be largely
retained. The proposed change of use is consistent with North
Water Street' s mix of commercial office and guest house
establishments . The parking demands of the use will be minimal
since it would be a low volume use given the very limited floor
area dedicated to the service establishment . The use proposed is
appropriately characterized as a neighborhood service
establishment even with the retail sales component . Each of the
examples given in the Zoning By-Law (which are the only clues
given by the By-Law as to a definition of a neighborhood service
establishment) would typically have retail sales associated with
the services being provided.
Feb96/WashZBA
•
♦tP t 241.4.‘♦•
. • µlg0oa
•
o •
n •
57.1
IS
1�J
4.% • 11 1
7
•
♦.♦t
i
. r
W
W
1 r 6!
+ i .
40000011,. .
♦ 1.1
• Tft EEZ• .t
sill: pt vi
. 4° µt01 J°�tt
t
1
t♦•
S
v
• w
Z
C
•rt'.t° S • 1 °'
Sit? or •° 9
a
•P
■
t
•t 0.
•2 t9
t°
• STREET *p 1�t
to °
�M
•
SS
ill• ka s...v.'`V
1111 111111 id S H jO °°vt'yp4 c. 0
�S
6 •
' Ili w •° .'._ 4 �\ �
001E.N E 1tt0c
CI ASH r\110 cwIIIIIs7"
µtot OOKEt •\
i ��
T•
SS
TA
\\ .
S T R E T ,`M t.1�cKCt
Al