HomeMy WebLinkAbout002-96 . 00Z -- Co
exxo-ruCM.E1, TOWN OF NANTUCKET
° ' - = N� BOARD OF APPEALS
\.,,,..,04,0RA NANTUCKET, MASSACHUSETTS 02554
February 14, 1996
To: Parties in interest and others
concerned with the Decision of the
Board of Appeals in Application No . : 002 _ 96
of : C . MARSHALL BEALE AND JOHN S . BEALE, JR .
Enclosed is the Decision of the Board of Appeals which has this
day been filed with the Nantucket Town Clerk . This Decision
provides a Clarification (not a Modification) or authorizes a
Temporary Permit under Zoning By-Law Section 139-26H with no
twenty ( 20) day appeal period required.
r
r Chairman
MJ6h C'ael J. O 'Mara ,
cc: Town Clerk
Planning Board
Building Commissioner
HEADE & ALGER.
PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION
SIX YOUNG'S WAY
ARTHUR I. READE, JR. NANTUCKET, MASSACHUSETTS 02554
SARAH F. ALGER (508) 228-3128
FAX: (508) 228-5330 MAILING ADDRESS
KENNETH A. GULLICKSEN POST OFFICE 130N 2009
MARIANNE HANLEY NANTUCKET,MASS 02584
PATRICIA A. HALSTED
WHITNEY A. GIFFORD February 5, 1996
Michael J. O' Mara, Chair
Nantucket Zoning Board of Appeals
Town Building Annex
37 Washington Street
Nantucket, Massachusetts 02554
Re : C. Marshall Beale and John S .
Beale, Jr. , Applicants
Case No. 002-96
207 Polpis Road
Assessor' s Map 25 , Parcels 2
and 35
Lots 12 and 13 , Land Court
Plan No . 10192-I
Nantucket , Massachusetts
Dear Mr. O'Mara :
We have just become aware of a typographical error in the
decision in the above matter.
In the second complete sentence on page 2 of the decision,
the minimum lot area required in a Limited Use General-3 zoning
district is incorrectly stated as being 200 , 000 square feet . ThE.
actual requirement is 120, 000 square feet . The sentence should
correctly read as follows :
The Abutter' s Land is nonconforming as to lot
area, having only about 66 , 416 square feet of land
area, where 120 , 000 square feet are required.
Thank you for your attention to this matter.
Sincere/iy, RECEIVED
�,/ TOWN CLERK'S OFFICE
S FA/ ��A �i2��'4
NANTUGK. T•
The typographical error in the FEB 141996
decision in the above matter is ) `- ►5/ �,
hereby corrected as set forth above TIME:
on February / , 1996 . .,u,
CLERK:
hael J. O'Mara, Chair
Nantucket Zoning Board of Appeals
f:\wp\beale\boa00296.1tr
0,147UCkFr TOWN OF NANTUCKET
� s
3 t v
0 �z % BOARD OF APPEALS
O9pOAka NANTUCKET, MASSACHUSETTS 02554
mom
Date : January 3 / , 1996
To : Parties in Interest and. Others concerned with the
Decision of the BOARD OF APPEALS in the Application of the
following :
Application No . : 002-96
Owner/Applicant : C. MARSHALL BEALE AND JOHN S . BEALE, JR.
Enclosed is the Decision of the BOARD OF APPEALS which has
this day been filed in the office of the Nantucket Town
Clerk .
An Appeal from this Decision may be taken pursuant to
Section 17 of Chapter 40A, Massachusetts General Laws .
Any action appealing the Decision must be brought by
filing an complaint in court within TWENTY ( 20) days after
this day ' s date . Notice of the action with a copy of the
complaint and certified copy of the Decision must be given
to the Town Clerk so as to be received within such TWENTY
( 20 ) days .
V LI
Michael J. ' ra, Chairman
cc : Town Clerk
Planning Board
Building Commissioner
.PLEASE NOTE: MOST SPECIAL PERMITS AND VARIANCES HAVE A TIME
LIMIT AND WILL EXPIRE IF NOT ACTED UPON ACCORDING. TO NANTUCKET
ZONING BY-LAW '§139-30I ( SPECIAL PERMITS) ; § 139-32I (VARIANCES )
ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE CALL THE NANTUCKET ZONING BOARD OF APPEAL: .
NANTUCKET ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
South Beach Street
Nantucket, Massachusetts 02554
Assessor' s Map 25, Parcels 2 and 35 Lots 12 and 13 , Land
Certificate of Title No . 15, 355 Court Plan 10192-I
Limited Use General-3 278 Polpis Road
DECISION:
1 . At a public hearing of the Nantucket Zoning Board of
Appeals, held on Friday, January 5, 1996, at 1 : 00 P.M. , in the
Selectmen' s Meeting Room, in the Town and County Building, Broad
Street, Nantucket, Massachusetts, the Board made the following
decision on the application of C. MARSHALL BEALE and JOHN S .
BEALE, JR. , c/o Reade & Alger Professional Corporation, Six
Young' s Way, Post Office Box 2669, Nantucket, Massachusetts
02584 , File No. 002-96 :
2 . Applicants are seeking relief by VARIANCE pursuant to
Nantucket Zoning By-law §139-32 from the requirements of By-law
§139-16 .A and D. Applicants propose to reconfigure the lot lines
of the Locus by an exchange of land with an abutter, and possible
conveyance of additional land to another abutter, notwithstanding
the fact that the reconfigured boundaries of the Locus will not
be in conformity with frontage and regularity factor requirements
of the By-law. The abutter' s property will become conforming in
every respect as a result of the exchange of land. The Locus now
has frontage of 65 . 06 feet, which will be increased to 115 . 06
feet; 200 feet are required in this district . Regularity factor
under By-law §139-16 .D is now 0 . 327; the exchange would result in
a regularity factor of 0 . 352 , and the possible conveyance of
additional land to another abutter would increase the regularity
factor to 0 . 508 . The required minimum regularity factor is 0 . 55 .
The subject property (the "Locus" ) is located at 278 POLPIS ROAD,
Assessor' s Map 25, Parcels 2 and 35, and is shown as Lots 12 and
13 on Land Court Plan 10192-I . The Locus is zoned LIMITED USE
GENERAL-3 .
3 . Our decision is based upon the application and
accompanying materials and representations and testimony received
at our public hearing. The Nantucket Planning Board made no
recommendation. There was no opposition to the application at
the public hearing. An attorney, representing an abutter, was
present and spoke in favor of the application. Several other
interested abutters were also present .
4 . As stated by Applicants at the public hearing, they own
the Locus, which is now shown as Lots 12 and 13 on Land Court
Plan No. 10192-I, and which is improved by a single-family
dwelling and boat house . The Locus is nonconforming as to
frontage having only about 65 . 06 feet of frontage, where 200 feet
is required, and as to regularity, having a regularity factor of
only about 0 . 327, where a minimum regularity factor of 0 . 55 is
required. The abutter owns the land, which is now shown as Lot A
on plan recorded with Nantucket Deeds in Plan Book 7, Page 11,
and which is improved by a single-family dwelling and garage (the
"Abutter' s Land" ) . The Abutter' s Land is nonconforming as to lot
area, having only about 66, 416 square feet of land area, where
200 , 000 square feet are required. The Locus and the Abutter' s
Land are pre-existing nonconforming lots having been held in
ownership separate from each other and all other adjacent land
since a time prior to the July 1972 effective date of the By-law.
Applicants propose to subdivide the Locus into Lots 13 , 14 , 15,
and 16 as shown on the Concept Plan, drawn by Nantucket Surveyors
Inc . , dated December 4 , 1995, a reduced copy of which is attached
hereto as Exhibit A (the "Concept Plan" ) . The abutter proposes
to subdivide the Abutter' s Land into Lots B and C, as shown on
the Concept Plan. Applicants then propose to convey Lots 13 and
14 to the abutter, and the abutter proposes to simultaneously
convey Lot C to Applicants . Following this exchange, the Locus,
as so reconfigured, will still be improved by a single-family
dwelling and a boat house and will consist of Lots 15, 16 , and C
on the Concept Plan (the "Reconfigured Locus" ) . The Abutter' s
Land, as so reconfigured, will still be improved by a single-
family dwelling and garage and will consist of Lots 13 , 14 , and B
on the Concept Plan (the "Reconfigured Abutter' s Land" ) . As a
result of the exchange, the Reconfigured Locus will be less
nonconforming in that it will have frontage of about 115 . 06 feet
and a regularity factor of 0 . 352, and the Reconfigured Abutter' s
Land will conforming in all respects . Applicants also want the
ability to convey Lot 16 to the owner, at the time of such
conveyance, of the abutting land shown as Assessor' s Map 25,
Parcel 31, but do not want to be required to do so. As a result
of this possible future conveyance of Lot 16 , the Reconfigured
Locus would become even less nonconforming, then having a
regularity factor of 0 . 508 . At the public hearing, Applicants
represented that the purpose of the exchange is to decrease the
nonconforming nature of the Locus and to bring the Abutter' s Land
into conformity. Applicants have no present intention of further
subdividing the Reconfigured Locus . Applicants understand that
the Nantucket Building Commissioner currently takes the position
that, without the requested relief, the Reconfigured Locus would
not have the benefit of grandfathered status, because By-law
§139-16 .A expressly provides that no lot shall be changed in
size, shape, boundaries, or frontage unless in conformity with
the requirements set forth therein. Although Applicants contend
that the Building Commissioner is misreading the By-law, which
should always be read to favor and encourage the reconfiguration
of nonconforming parcels to the extent necessary or possible to
eliminate or reduce nonconformities, Applicants nevertheless
request a variance from By-law §139-16 .A, to validate the
Reconfigured Locus, both before and after the proposed future
conveyance of Lot 16, as a valid, separately marketable,
buildable lot, which may be further improved and used as a matter
of right, with no further action of this Board being either
necessary or required, subject to all other provisions of the By-
law.
2
5 . Finding that the provision in By-law §139-16 .A, which.
appears to effectively prohibit reconfiguration of nonconforming
lots unless they are made completely conforming, appears harsh as
applied to the present case where the Locus is being made less
nonconforming and the Abutter' s Land is being brought totally
into conformity by Applicants' action, the Board voted, by
UNANIMOUS vote, to grant VARIANCE relief from By-law §139-16 .A to
Applicants, validating the Reconfigured Locus as a valid,
separately marketable, buildable lot, which may be further
improved and used as a matter of right, with no further action of
this Board being either necessary or required, subject to all
other provisions of the By-law, both before and after the
proposed future conveyance of Lot 16 (which is, on its own, an
unbuildable lot which may be combined with other land of an
abutter) . The Board further found that owing to the shape (the
Locus has a long, narrow dogleg) , soil (the Locus contains areas
of wetland) , and topography (the Locus is sloping and uneven) of
the Locus, especially affecting the Locus but not affecting
generally the zoning district in which the Locus is situated, a
literal enforcement of the provisions of the By-law would involve
substantial hardship to Applicants (in that Applicants should be
able to exchange land with an abutter to reduce the zoning
nonconformities of the Locus and eliminate the zoning
nonconformity of the abutter' s land and to convey Lot 16 to
another abutter to further reduce the zoning nonconformities of
the Locus) , and that the desired relief may be granted without
substantial detriment to the public good and without nullifying
or substantially derogating from the intent or purpose of the By-
law (in that the effect of validating the Reconfigured Locus ,
both before and after the possible future conveyance of Lot 16 ,
is actually a benefit to the public good, because zoning
nonconformities are thereby reduced or eliminated) . This relief
is granted upon the express condition that Applicants may only
convey Lot 16 to then owner of the land shown as Assessor' s Map
25, Parcel 31 .
Dated: January 3 / , 1996 0 AktAik
Mich 'Mara /
► _.
�' �>•r?,� - ,r-F1C;e_: Linda F. Williams
i1 z\F� � It/' r'4
JAN 31 199 7p. :a as
Robert . Leicht-r
_Gui l t'a m /'• Hour/ban, Jr.
f:\wp\beale\boaoo296.dec
3
. EXH_IBIT A
LOT16 ........... ♦ I
2L053.s6 F<.
POLPIS HARBOR -
,,.01 warn 4MA �-
_�,p E GREEK o utcs acs V' M, 100.00 Ate 1
..0 ,.R. 2.,,,''' / Reduced.0015 YAP SCALE:1'-.,000' L uc.11
N 20MiNG GLASSMATON
�. f 0150RGT:LUG 3-W1ED USE 000.3
I. 4.41401 LOT SIZE-120000 54 FL
4wi4W FRONTAGE-200 FL
I" - FRONT &DDE SCRAP(5016A0<-120 FL
:2 WAX.GRO050 CANER RAM-Sr
a.
v.
1 LOT 15 e
RUM.so-,
1.
A.
t
MKS
p:t
,NCO 4A i
M I
'4y}
LOT 13 S. r
ace
� U( _,
RN
� Et... *'
N'o. ,A,S 1
\\
a:a
A. 251221 sy4Fa / TT'
Fla,. VCR
h 0 .141.\ ,1 NGf pl.4
'4/
csa
N a
My� k ? 4 � M N {4/ it
T.} ! « - 4
N. d¢ A •• +v
+ l@ N RE �y. 1 , J... ‘V ...1 s 01.
V
�Ra r
LOT B \W 4F l
62,360.sq.Ft i.l
w ,:=L�
6
u.. \
•4 LOT C
4 4,6x sq.n
FASTING CONDITIONS: 5 6161,'''4
LOT A 276 POLPIS RD. LOT 12 & 13 278 POLPIS RD.
AREA: 66,415 S.F. AREA: 24 ± ACRES (1,050,000+ S.F.) B RO
FRONTAGE: 250.64' FRONTAGE: 65.06'
G.C.R.: 5.6% G.C.R.: 0.16%
REGULARITY: 0.94 REGULARITY: 0.33
PROPOSED CONDITIONS: CONCEPT PLAN
LOTS B &13 & 14 LOTS C &15 & 16 FOR
AREA: 261.013 S.F. AREA: 19.67 ACRES (857,000± S.F.) • REDIVISION OF LANDS OF
FRONTAGE: 200.64' FRONTAGE: 115.06' 1N� OF M
G.C.R.: 1.43% G.C.R.: 0.19% RA� .44
REGULARITY: 0.63 REGULARITY: 0.36 ° RICHARD y A: ESTATE OF JOHN S. BEALE
(BASED ON 120,000 S.F.) K. B: C. MARSHALL BEALE &
EARLS ^; JOHN S. BEALE, JR.
REFERENCES: T, No 29476 .pe
DEED REF.: BK. 114 PG. 366 �^`',. -`__ . C
DEED REF.: CERT.#15,355 ;'";IANJ DECEMBER 4, 1995
PLAN REF.: PL.BK. 7 PG. 11
PLAN REF.: L.C.PL.#10192-I PENDING NANTUCKET SURVEYORS INC.
ASSESSORS MAP 25 PARCELS 2, 31, & 35 GRAPHIC SCALE
1"-200• 5 WINDY WAY
NANTUCKET, MA. 02554
(505)-228-0240
a\.loss\CAW\N4666\TRIG 0 200 400 600 800 N-4686
oxruckr. TOWN OF NANTUCKET
BOARD OF APPEALS
b
�4woRmil" NANTUCKET, MASSACHUSETTS 02554
NOTICE
A Public Hearing of the NANTUCKET ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
will be held at 1 : 00 P .M. , FRIDAY, JANUARY 5 , 1996, in the
Selectmen ' s Meeting Room, Town and County Building, Broad Street ,
Nantucket, Massachusetts , on the Application of the following :
C. MARSHALL BEALE AND JOHN S . BEALE , JR.
BOARD OF APPEALS FILE NO . 002-96
Applicants are seeking relief by VARIANCE pursuant to
Nantucket Zoning By-Law § 139-32 from the requirements of Zoning
By-Law §139-16A and D. Applicants propose to reconfigure the
lot lines of the Locus by an exchange of land with an abutter ,
and possible conveyance of additional land to another abutter ,
notwithstanding the fact that the reconfigured boundaries of the
Locus will not be in conformity with frontage and regularity
factor requirements of the By-Law. The abutter ' s property will
become conforming in every respect as a result of the exchange
of land . The Locus now has frontage of 65 . 06 feet, which will
be increased to 115 . 06 feet; 200 feet are required in this
district . Regularity factor under By-Law § 139-16D is now 0 . 327 ;
the exchange would result in a regularity factor of 0 . 352 , and
the possible conveyance of additional land to another abutter
would increase the regularity factor to 0 . 508 . The required
minimum regularity factor is 0 . 55 .
The premises ( the "Locus" ) is located at 278 POLPIS ROAD,
Assessor ' s Map 25 , Parcels 2 and 35 , and is shown as Lots 12 and
13 on Land Court Plan 10192-I . The property is zoned Limited
Use General-III .
' 1 0 (Manilk_
Michael J. 0 ' Ora , Chairman
THIS NOTICE iS AVAILABLE IN LARGE PRINT OR OTHER
ALTERNATIVE FORMATS. FOR ASSISTANCE CALL
(508) 228-7215 .
BoA Form 1-89 NANTUCKET ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
TOWN AND COUNTY BUILDING Date /
NANTUCKET, MA 02554 pp�� C/
. CASE No.WC�(
• • APPLICATION FOR RELIEF
•
Owner s name(s) : C. Marshall Beale and John S. Beale, Jr.
c/o Reade & Alger Professional Corporation • •
Mailing address: 6 Young's Way, Post Office Box 2669, Nantucket., Massachusetts .02584
Applicant's name: Same
Mailing address: • • • •
Location of lot:• Asse'ssor's map and parcel• number 25 - 2 and 35
Street address: 278 Polpis Road •
Feg try Land Ct Plan, Plan Bk & '2g or Plan File 10192-I Lot12 and 13
Cert.
Date lot acquired: 30 92
9 _/ _/ Doo ooci RRot 15 355 Zoning district LUG-3
uired: 6
Uses on lot - commercial: None X or • • • MCD?
- number of: dwellings 1. duplex__ apartments rental rooms__
Building date(s) : all pre-8/72? YeS or . C of O?
Building Permit appl'n. Nos, .
•
Case Nos. all BoA applications, lawsuits:
State fully all .zoning relief sought and respective Code sections
and subsections, specifically what' you propose compared to present
and what !grounds you urge for, BoA to make each finding per Section
139-32A X if Variance, 139-30A if a Special Permit •(and 139-33A
if to alter or extend a nonco forming use) . If appeal per 1'39-3]1A
�-B ^ , attach decision or order appealed. OK to attach addendum
The Applicants, request a variance from Liantucket Zoning By-law, Section 16.A and D,
in order to enable them to reconfigure the boundary lines of the Locus by an
exchange of land.with an abutter, and possible conveyance of additional land to
another abutter, notwithstanding the fact that the reconfigured boundaries of the Locus
will not be in conformity with frontage and regularity'factor requirements of the by-law.
The abutter's property will become conforming in every respect as a result of tie
exchange of land. The Locus now has frontage of .65.06 feet, which will be increased
to 115.06 feet; 200 feet are required in this district. Regularity factor under
By-law. Section 16D is now 0.327; the exchange would result in a regularity factor of
0,352, and a possible conveyance of additional land to another abutter would increase
r t factor to 0. red-minimum LegulaL ty factor i3 0.55.
I s 'clfr0�se1 as part of this Application: order addendum2
Locus map X Site plan ' showing present .+planned structures
Floor plans present proposed elevates _-
L+ p (HOC approved?_) --
Listings lot area x frontage Ketbacks. GCR parking data n_
Assessor-certified addressee list 4 sets.g rnaA.lT g labels 2 sets u
$200 fee payable to Town. of Nantucket proof 'cap' covenant 7, ' -'
- (If an appeal, ask Town'Clerk to sea Bldg Comr s, record to BoAT -° -'
rm
I certify that the. requested informatiorj? submitted is substantially :�
complete 'and true' to the. best of my knowledge,' under the pains and , _,,
penalties of per y.
SIGNATURE: - ��( Applicant Attorney/agent X rt,
3 (If not owner or owner's attorney, enclose proof of, authority)
'i
. FOR A OFFICE USE
Application copies recd: 4 V or for BoAren I
One copy filed with Town Clerk on j i by /�J`4 �dmplete?//
One copy each to Planning Bd and Building Dept ►/ .y (p.613
$200 fee check given (Tlo'wn Tre/sssurer on , 6,i by ,�/ waived?
•Hearing notice pdste•d1.1/ ji) mailed , I & M�/_,_./ J/hCgP
Hearing(s) on_/_/ Tcont'd to'/_,/^, '__/`/_ withdrawn?__/__/^
Decision due by_/__/ made_/__/ filed TC^/_/_ mailed_/_/
See related cases lawsuits ' other
1 `V.‘ 32 AC i
•
■
POLPI S ,. o
ta AC.
\
2 AC. � T �,\�' I
i QJ I
-—-
2.4 AC. �1 •
4 1>5
`r. 111��� t ROPE "24 Ir
20.1 AC. 4' j ,�
`' 50 <9 N. / A
I I 281 ac 276 ac 48 274
j"--. , 276ac 47
2.76 ac
/, Ilk $ .
.,(
//
1
0 AC. . k/
3.2 AC.
// •
/ aAc•
\III 2* 29./ 11 os
IA AC.
II + -
I 2011110M of TYCIQT 7 } � `'
_
tl .C.
\\ 2$1
u
\S 3.s re A4 I1 ,t
v0\''? 1 7z
• It .
t.0 AC.
' f r• + 9
± ...,
M 0.0 AC.
t`.4 Lt AC.
7^ li F
T. LO AC.
a it
- 11.0 AC.
2x o
. tip _
\
• 9
O
\ - O
81
± + I
i
E7$
N-4 7.0 AC.
•1-2
I I I
IONS 1 LEGEND
I _.!_, OAtE fAACEI __ ____ ._ _ _ _ rilhil r111,..1.1. .1 1111 t III t