HomeMy WebLinkAbout066-95 •,v,HTUCkFd, TOWN OF NANTUCKET �9 ( (� - 41
t N'
•
BOARD OF APPEALS
o.,TR„T,V NANTUCKET, MASSACHUSETTS 02554
Date : November 30 , 1995
To : Parties in Interest and. Others concerned with the
Decision of the BOARD OF APPEALS in the Application of the
following:
Application No . : 066-95
Owner/Applicant : ROBERT B. FLINN AND SARAH M. FLINN, OWNERS
AND CHARLES S. CRUICE AND KATHRYN W. CRUICE, CONTRACT
PURCHASERS
Enclosed is the Decision of the BOARD OF APPEALS which has
this day been filed in the office of the Nantucket Town
Clerk.
An Appeal from this Decision may be taken pursuant to
Section 17 of Chapter 40A, Massachusetts General Laws .
Any action appealing the Decision must be brought by
filing an complaint in court within TWENTY ( 20) days after
this day ' s date . Notice of the action with a copy of the
complaint and certified copy of the Decision must be given
to the Town Clerk so as to be received within such TWENTY
( 20) days .
C,
Michae . O 'Mara Chairman
cc : Town Clerk
Planning Board
Building Commissioner
PLEASE NOTE: MOST SPECIAL PERMITS AND VARIANCES HAVE A TIME
LIMIT AND WILL EXPIRE IF NOT ACTED UPON ACCORDING- TO NANTUCKET
ZONING BY-LAW §139-30I (SPECIAL PERMITS) ; §139-32I (VARIANCES)
ANY QUESTIONS , PLEASE CALL THE NANTUCKET ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS .
NANTUCKET ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
South Beach Street
Nantucket, Massachusetts 02554
Assessor' s Map 73 . 3 . 1, Land Court Plan 17788-B, Lot 1
Parcels 43 and 44 and adjacent unregistered land
Certificate of Title No. 10247; 5 Morey Lane, Siasconset
Deed in Book 177, Page 198 Residential-2
DECISION:
1 . At a public hearing of the Nantucket Zoning Board of
Appeals, on Friday, November 3 , 1995, at 1 : 00 P.M. , in the
Selectmen' s Meeting Room, in the Town and County Building, Broad
Street, Nantucket, Massachusetts, the Board made the following
decision on the application of ROBERT B . FLINN and SARAH M.
FLINN, Owners, and CHARLES S . CRUICE and KATHRYN W. CRUICE
(Contract Purchasers) , c/o Reade & Alger Professional
Corporation, Post Office Box 2669, Nantucket, Massachusetts
02584 , File No. 066-95 :
2 . The applicants are requesting a FINDING pursuant tc
M.G.L. , c . 40A, §6, and Nantucket Zoning By-law §139-33 .A(4) (a) ,
or in the alternative a SPECIAL PERMIT under Nantucket Zoning By-
law §139-33 .A (alteration or extension of a pre-existinc
nonconforming structure or use) . The applicants propose to
change the use of a garage structure, said to be pre-existing and.
nonconforming, to a studio, not to be used for human habitation.
The existing structures, consisting of a single-family dwelling
and a garage, are nonconforming as to side and rear yard setback
requirements, with the dwelling being sited 5 . 1± feet from the
southerly side yard lot line and the garage being sited 6 . 2± feet
from the rear yard lot line at their closest points, in a
district that requires a minimum side and rear setback of ten
(10) feet . The subject property is also nonconforming as to
minimum lot area and frontage requirements, having an area of
9, 868± square feet and frontage of 62 . 1± feet along Morey Lane,
in a district that requires minimum lot area of 20, 000 square
feet and minimum frontage of 75 feet . In addition or in the
alternative, the applicants are seeking a SPECIAL PERMIT under
Nantucket Zoning By-law §139-16 . C, to reduce the side and rear
yard setback requirement from ten (10) feet to five (5) feet in
the R-2 district in which the subject property is located, to the
extent necessary to validate the siting of the existing
structures . The subject property (the "Locus" ) is situated at 5
1
MOREY LANE, SIASCONSET, Assessor' s Map 73 . 3 . 1, Parcels 43 and 44 ,
consisting of Lot 1 on Land Court Plan 17788-B and a lot
described in deed recorded with Nantucket Deeds in Book 177, Page
198 . The Locus is zoned RESIDENTIAL-2 .
3 . Our decision is based upon the application and
accompanying materials, and representations and testimony
received at our public hearing. There was no Planning Board
recommendation. No support nor opposition was presented at the
public hearing; one letter was received, expressing concern.
4 . The applicants presented evidence that, and we find,
that the structures upon the Locus, as shown upon the plot plan
by Charles W. Hart & Associates, Inc . , dated October 3 , 1995, a
reduced copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit A, have
existed in their present location since a time prior to the
present dimensional zoning requirements with which they are
nonconforming. The contract purchasers inform us that they wish
to convert a portion of the existing garage structure for use as
a home office or studio, with a bathroom, for their personal use;
no clients or members of the public would be seen at this
location, nor would it be used as a dwelling nor as a dwelling
unit, nor otherwise for human habitation. There would be no
change to the footprint or massing of the existing garage
structure; changes to the exterior of the building would be
limited to replacement of doors and windows and other cosmetic
changes .
5 . Since the garage structure is not in conformity with the
required rear yard setback of ten (10) feet, any change in its
use requires zoning relief . The applicants have suggested two
alternative forms of relief which could be granted. The Board
could make a finding that the alteration of the garage structure
to contain an office/studio with bathroom, as ancillary to the
use of the principal structure upon the Premises as a dwelling,
would not be substantially more detrimental to the neighborhood
than the existing nonconformities which would be altered. The
other option would be the issuance of a special permit under
§139-16 . C (1) , which expressly permits the Board of Appeals to
issue a special permit reducing the required side or rear yard
setback from ten to five feet in the Residential-2 zoning
district . After consideration, the Board decided to grant the
relief by special permit under §139-16 .C (1) , subject to the
imposition of certain conditions
2
6 . The Board of Appeals found that the issuance of a
special permit under §139-16 . C (1) would be in harmony with the
general purpose and intent of the By-law. Accordingly, it voted
UNANIMOUSLY to issue relief by SPECIAL PERMIT, reducing the
required rear yard setback from ten (10) feet to five (5) feet,
as it is empowered to do in the Residential-2 zoning district, to
the extent necessary to validate the siting of the existinc
structure and allow for its conversion for a permitted ancillary
use to the principal use of the Locus for a dwelling, subject to
the following conditions :
(a) There shall be no kitchen within the home
office/studio to be placed within the present garage structure;
(b) The garage structure, as altered as proposed,
shall not be used for human habitation; and
(c) There shall be no further exterior construction
within any portion of the Locus lying within the ten (10) foot.
side or rear yard setback area from any property line, without
the issuance of further relief by the Board of Appeals in a
proceeding duly brought .
Dated: November 50, 1995 C
Mic .O'Mara
` .--}"P&_1-- --- 6(1 qii-Cfl -1/- 4' _
Lind,f F. Kilns.Kilns.
.M' • a-lAngelastro
William P. Hourihan, Jr.
\ ) a■iLLA V - _ _Q-Lkir-z_. K.,: --.
Nancy J. Sevrens
f:\wp\cruice\boa5mor.dec
RECEWED
TOWN CLERK'S OFFICE
NANTUrvr.;- r-a_ —,r're ,/,.
NOV 3 0 1995
3
EXHIBIT A
ZONING CtASSIFTTlCA'FION". 'R-2 EXISTING:
MIN. AREA <O00 5F X868 ter.
MIN. FRO(rACcE: . . . :7� t . , . 5 • i N A/•FRONT YARD`S.B.: . ..3P.��' . . „
REAR & SIDE S,B.: . . lo��'
GROUND COVER (7.): . .1?',fir. 7', ,
/,�
r
73 3. I 2, 1'2.1 4 4S.2 ro.,f
o�K E(uNr/A.16- -0 N -r 4 AHD H.
-,,,-.40, ,
3
GAR.X.7 .
.t:Al?s5f
■ i. `c
co, _NG . N% ;t:0\ os
kj \CY; \ r,
\.
6 \ \ TVLy•B \ \ o7,-J
.
s ` \ ✓ ox/. 77N6-
\ 5 AcN A/P
by �2 KGB \ \\
�+ElU^ks \
A=IbrO,S� \ \
7' „.
'S \
GONG. . .
Li- Y N X \
0'., ��
Lo
Or-----
tFfik EH 1 V
,c. r.k, .3:,k.(-II, i i
‘r,:erlA-934:4Y)L
±':C.) 1---A
I CERTIFY, AS OF • /1°.--3 -±?4-' , THAT
THE BUILDINC(S) IS/ARE LOCATED ON THE BUILDING LOCATION PLAN
GROUND AS SHOWS HEREON.
OF LAND IN
Keyo, 4)41-(6 a NANTUCKET MASS.
PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR
SCALE: 1`= „. :::)' DATE o&/ 3, /995
THIS PLOT PLAN WAS PREPARED FOR THE TOWN
OF NANTUCKET BUILDING DEPARTMENT ONLY AND Owner: .�A�{ a1 T 3. �?INnJ
SHOULD NOT BE CONSIDERED A PROPERTY UNE °iE .Z2 /77 / 9 , La/'
SURVEY. THIS PLAN SHOULD NOT BE USED TO Deed. ...' ... 421.7 , , Plo�t L.G..1 7>Bg_P.
ESTABLISH PROPERTY LINES, FENCES, HEDGES, OR bD ��i=r9e
ANY ANCILLARY STRUCTURES ON THE PREMISES. Locus A'' ° Y -4
THE PROPERTY P RELY ON CURRENT
PLANS OF RECORD. CHARLES W. HART & ASSOCIATES, Inc.
THIS PLOT PLAN IS NOT A CERTIFICATION AS TO SANFORD BOAT BUILDING
TITLE OR OWNERSHIP OF THE PROPERTY SHOWN. 49 SPARKS AVENUE
OWNERS OF' ADJOINING PROPERTIES ARE SHOWN
ACCORDING TO CURRENT ASSESSOR RECORDS. NANTUCKET, MASS. 02554
ASSESSOR MAP: 7 .3•( , PARCEL . l3, >;'1•1L NOT TO BE RECORDED. (508) 228-8910 H-4883
4\108S\C H\ell