HomeMy WebLinkAbout073-90i
073 -�G�
TOWN OF NANTUCKET
BOARD OF APPEALS
NANTUCKET, MASSACHUSETTS 02554
Date: December 10 , 19 90
To: Parties in Interest and_Others concerned with the
Decision of the BOARD OF APPEFLS in the Application of the
following:
�Ipplication No.:
073 -90
Owner /Applicant: Nancy Colson
Enclosed is the Decision of the BOARD OF APPEALS which has
this day been filed in the office of the Nantucket Town
Clerk.
An 1ppeal from this Decision may he taken pursuant to
Section 17 of Chapter 40A/ Massachusetts General Laws.
lily action appealing the Decision must be urougnt ;'y
filing an Complaint in Court within TWENTY ( ?0 ) days after
this day's date. Notice of the action with a copy of the
Coi !a4nt and certified copy of the Decision must be given
to t1ne Town Clerk so as to be received witnin such lvZ i,,'TY
(20) days. 1---1
obert Lei�hter,.- Chairman
cc: Town Clerk
Planning Board
Building Commissioner
BOARD OF APPEALS
TOWN OF NANTUCKET
NANTUCKET, MASSACHUSETTS
Decision:
At a public hearing held by the Nantucket Board of Appeals
on Friday, November 16, 1990, at 1:00 P.M., at the _Town and
County Building, Federal and Broad Streets, Nantucket, the Board
made the following decision upon the application of NANCY COLSON
(073 -90) :
1. This is an application for the modification of an
�xistin9 variance, granted by decision of the Board to a prior
owner in Case No. 056 -83. This variance granted a waiver from
the 12 -foot spacing requirement under Nantucket Zoning by -law
Section 139- 7A(2)(b), as then in effect, between a principal
dwelling upon the Locus and a secondary dwelling which was then
proposed and has subsequently been constructed. The application
seeks a modification of this variance in order to expressly
permit the construction of an open porch on the southerly side of
the principal dwelling, to be connected to a deck now existing
and attached to the secondary dwelling. The Locus is situated at
HALLOWELL LANE (Assessor's Parcels 30 -14, 30 -15 and 30 -257),
Land Court Plan 12022 -H, Lot 30A, Land Court Plan 12022 -Q, Lot
47, and an adjacent unregistered parcel, and is zoned as
RESIDE T•T "' - 2 .
2. In our decision in 056 -83, we found that the relief
requested therein met the standards necessary for the grant of a
variance. �nt�°���s T e- 4� - "�'�ariance was duly and timely
exercised, and that the secondary dwelling contemplated thereby
was erected within twelve feet of the principal dwelling; the
certified plot plan presented with the application before us
shows a separation of about three feet. Accordingly, we do not
herein re- examine the satisfaction of the criteria for issuance
of variance relief. Rather, we concern ourselves with the
question of whether the new construction proposed herein is
consistent with the finding by the Board in 056 -83 and the relief
granted thereby.
3. We note that the Board in 056 -83 placed great weight in
its decision upon the importance of the visual effect of the
construction therein proposed. We are presented here with
photographs and elevations of the existing structures upon the
Locus, and with a letter from the Historic District Commission's
Administrator to this Board, describing the applicant's plans as
"an improvement to the existing undistinguished house, and an
appropriate design for its context ".
4. The 12 -foot front -to -back spacing requirement as it
r
existed under our by -law until the passage of Article 13 at the
Special Town Meeting session of November 13, 1990 was intended to
benefit the community aesthetically by staggering building
locations. Although the present application was filed prior to
this zoning change, we are mindful that the Town thus voted to
eliminate the front -to -back spacing requirement as a zoning
matter, preferring to rely upon the Historic District
Commission's aesthetic expertise in approving siting of
buildings. However, the Town retained a zoning requirement of 12
feet of scalar separation between principal and secondary
dwellings, and we understand the purpose of this continuing
requirement to be related to safety considerations, to maintain
the opportunity for emergency vehicles to pass between the two
dwellings. Thus, based upon the plot plan and photographs of the
site, we are satisfied that, under present conditions, it is
already unfeasible for emergency vehicles to fit between the Zwo
buildings, and we find that the proposed construction will have
no effect upon this safety consideration.
5. Accordingly, we find that the construction proposed by
the applicant as shown upon the plans submitted to us, copies of
the relevant portions of which are attached as Exhibit A hereto,
is consistent with the scope and intent of the variance granted
by us in 056 -83, that it will not effect a substantial detriment
to the public good, and that it will not nullify nor
substantially derogate from the intent or purpose of the By -law.
Therefore, by unanimous vote, we grant the requested modification
of the existing variance, subject to the condition that the work
be done in substantial conformity to the plans, copies of which
are attached hereto as Exhibit A.
Dated: k." Y�i A_ %(� 1990
4VI ✓�
Linda F. Williams
William R. Sherman
kah /'3 /SRAMAN2
C_
C. Marshall Beale
(&49 AdI6_Q_
Ann G. Balas
Pe er F. Dooley
iawv -in �4k
TOWN OF NANTUCKET
BOARD OF APPEALS
NANTUCKET, MASSACHUSETTS 02554
NOTICE
A Public Hearing of the BOARD OF APPEALS will be held
on FRIDAY, NOVEMBER 16, 1990 at 1:00 P.M. in the Town and
County Building, Federal and Broad Streets, Nantucket, on the
Application of:
NANCY COLSON
Board of Appeals File No.: 073 -90
Applicant seeks a MODIFICATION of the VARIANCE relief granted
in Board of Appeals file 056 -83 from the requirements of
SECTION 138- 7A(1)(b) of the Zoning By -Law (minimum of twelve
foot separation between dwellings). The requested
modification of that Variance is to permit placement of a
covered porch on the main dwelling connecting with the
existing deck on the secondary dwelling.
The premises are located at 9 HALLOWELL LANE, Assessor's Map
30, Parcels 14, 15 and 257, as shown on Land Court Plan
12022 -H, Lot 30A and Land Court Plan 12022 -Q, Lot 47 and are
zoned RESIDENTIAL -2.
N
. a(z "11_�
Linda F. Williams, Chairman
BOA Form 1 -89 NANTUCKET ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS ----5-ate
te
TOWN AND COUNTY BUILDING �j}''�
NANTUCKET, MA 02554 CASE NO40sk 1
APPLICATION FOR RELIEF
Owner's name(s):
Nancy Colson
Mailing address: c/o Reade & Alger P. C., P. O. Box 2669, Nantucket, MA 02584
Applicant's name: Nanc Colson
Mailing address: c/o Reade & Alger P. C., P. 0. Box 2669, Nantucket, MA 02584
Location of lot: Assessor's map and parcel number 30 - 14, 15, 257
Street address: 9 Hallowell Lane and 12022 -H Lot 30A, 47
_ ON ....
Registry Land Ct Plan, P! Cert. of T
9 1 90 �^� 14549 Zoning district R-2
Date lot acquired: ��— Deed Ref. 35072Z5—
MCD ?No
Uses on lot - commercial: None X or
- number of: dwellings-2 duplex_ apartments_ rental rooms_
Building date(s): all pre -8/72? _ or
C of 0 ?Yes 3426 -90
Building Permit appl'n. Nos. 3426 -84
Case Nos. all BOA applications, lawsuits: 056 -83
State fully all zoning relief sought and respective Code sections
nt
and subsections, specifically what you propose compared per to Section
and what grounds you urge for BOA to make each finding p
139 -32A X if Variance, 139-30A if a Special Permiealaner139 -33�A
if to alter or extend a nonconforming us). if appeal per 139-3 .
; B _ , attach decision or order appealed.
Applicant requests modification of existing variance relief from 12 foot spacing
requirement in Case No. (56 -83) to allow for placement of covered front porch on
main dwelling, connecting with existing deck of secondary dwelling.
addendum2
Items enclosed as part of this Application: ordelanned structures
Locus map X Site plan X showing present p HD a roved? )
Floor plans presentx_ proposed elevations X ( Crain data
Listings lot area frontage setbacks_ GCRr_ parking data
sets
Assessor - certified addressee ist 4 sets mailing covenant_
1200 fee payable to Town of Nantucket proof 'cap'
(If an appeal, ask. Town Clerk to send Bldg Comr's record to BOA.)
I certify that the requested informatin sub ittedeistsubstin tally
complete and true to the best of my knowledge,
penalties of p jury.
SIGNATURE:
Applicant Attorney /agent X
3(If not owner or owner's attorney, enclose proof of authority)
FOR BOA OFFICE USE GG
/ �CobY�
Application copies recd: 4 ✓ or_ for BOA on
%/ complete ?�
One copy filed with Town Clerk on v by
One copy each to Planning Bd and Building Dept
by
/ b waived?
$200 fee check given //Town Treasure r on( b/)/
& M �, /�lL� �L/
Hearing notice posted 5A mailedZt/ I � -�
liearing(s) on_-_/_/._ cont'd to_-/--/—, withdrawn ?__/—/_
made filed TC_-_/�_ mailed--/--/—
Decision due by_/._/_. �--/—
See related cases
lawsuits other
U