HomeMy WebLinkAbout048-90TOWN OF NANTUCKET
BOARD OF APPEALS
NANTUCKET, MASSACHUSETTS 02554
Date: September 13► 19 90
To: Parties in Interest and Others concerned with the
Decision of the BOARD OF APPEALS in the Application of the
following:
Application No.: 048 -90
Owner /Applicant: Anthony and Barbara Prestandrea
Enclosed is the Decision of the BOARD OF APPEALS which has
this day been filed in the office of the Nantucket Town
Clerk.
An Appeal from this Decision may be taken pursuant to
Section 17 of Chapter 40A, Massachusetts General Laws.
Any action appealing the Decision must be brought by
filing an complaint in court within TWENTY (20) days after
this day's date. Notice of the action with a copy of the
complaint and certified copy of the Decision must be given
to the Town Clerk so as to be received within such TWENTY
(20) days.
L nda F. liams, C airman
cc: Town Clerk
Planning Board
Building Commissioner
Map 42.3.4
Parcel 112
Residential
TOWN OF NANTUCKET
BOARD OF APPEALS
NANTUCKET, MASSACHUSETTS 02554
Old Historic
14 Liberty Street
Plan Book 15, Page 9
At A Public Hearing of the Zoning Board of Appeals held on August
17„ 1990 at 1:00 P.M. in the Town and County Building, Nantucket,
on the Application of ANTHONY AND BARBARA PRESTANDREA (048 -90), address
15 Seacliff Lane, Miller Place, NY 11764, the Zoning Board of Appeals
made the following Decision:
1. Applicant sought a Special Permit under Section 139 -33A of the
Zoning By -Law to allow extension of a pre- existing non - conforming
single - family dwelling which violates a sideline setback requiremen
Applicant proposed to reconstruct the existing rear stoop and
steps, which would extend the non - conforming use of the premises,
but would not extend the sideline setback encroachment further
into the required 5' setback. At its closest, the structure now
is 3" - 4" from the side line in the area under consideration.
2. Based upon a review of the Application, supporting documents, plan;
(Exhibit "A" and "B ") and testimony, the Board finds that the
proposed addition would not be substantially more detrimental
to the neighborhood and is in harmony with the general purpose
and intent of the Zoning By -Law. No opposition was heard.
3. Accordingly, our Board voted unanimously, to grant the Special
Permit as requested under Section 139 -33A upon the following
condition:
A. the addition be constructed in substantial compliance with t'r.;
plans submitted, our Exhibit "B ".
William R. Sherman
- 0 A
C. Ma shall Beale