Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout027-90Form 3-39 EapN U TOWN OF NANTUCKET "1 BOARD OF APPEALS RpORATE� NANTUCKET, MASSACHUSETTS 02554 May 301 1990 To: Parties in interest and others concerned with the decision of the Board of Appeals in Application No. 027 -90 of: TOWN OF NANTUCKET, FOR ITSELF AND HARBORVIEW SHOPKEEPERS TRUST MARIO TEXEIRA, TRUSTEE, OWNER Enclosed is the decision of the Board of Appeals which has this day been filed with the Nantucket Town Clerk. An appeal from this decision may be taken pursuant to Section 17 of Chapter 40A, Massachusetts General Laws. Any action appealing the decision must be brought by filing a complaint in court •- i�.thin twenty (20) days after this day's date. Notice of L,_ action with a copy of the complaint and certified copy of the decision must be given to the Town Clerk so as to be received within such twenty (20) days. Willi m R. Sherman, Chairman cc: Town Clerk Planning Board Building Commissioner TOWN OF NANTUCKET ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Nantucket, Mass. 02554 At a public meeting on Friday, May 4, 1990, at 1:00 P.M. in the Town and County Building, Nantucket, on the Application (027- 00) of the TOWN OF NANTUCKET, Broad Street, Nantucket, Massachusetts, for itself and HARBORVIEW SHOPKEEPERS TRUST, MARIO TEXEIRA, TRUSTEE, owner, the Nantucket Zoning Board of Appeals .ade the following DECISION: 1. The Town seeks relief under Section 139 -33A of the Zoning By -Law for a change in use of a non - conforming building to be used for Town offices under a lease - purchase agreement with the owner. Relief for such purposes is also sought under the provisions of Section 139 -18G from the parking requirements of Sections 139 -18C, 18I, and 18(F)(1)(c). The existing parking is to be redesigned to provide thirteen (13) diagonal parking spaces in accordance with the plan appended hereto (EXHIBIT A). The building is currently being used as a moped and bicycle rental business under Special Permit 15 -79, and it is said to be non - - onforming as to side and rear setback, off - street loading facilities, screening, and open space. In addition, the Applicant is seeking a waiver of the filing fee. 2. The premises are located at the intersection of South Beach Street (currently one -way south) and Oak Street (two -way west of the intersection and one -way toward the east) and consists of an unimproved corner lot (Assessor's Parcel 42.4.2 -27) and an abutting improved lot (10 South Beach Street, Parcel 42.4.2 -70). Se Land Court Plans 8755 -B (with Oak shown as "Town" Street) and 3755 -G (Lots 19 and 3 corresponding to Parcels 42.4.2 -27 and 70 respectively). The zoning district is Residential- Commercial in which municipal offices are a permitted use. Reference is made to Special Permit 114 -87 (Cf. 106 -87) granted 12/28/87 (and clarified 12/9/88) to the owner for contiguous Assessor's Parcel 42.4.2 -28. 3. Applicant and owner acknowledge, and the Board finds that the two lots in question were merged for zoning purposes, and, therefore, no waiver is required for off -site parking, despite the parking being on a lot assessed separately from the lot upon which the building is situated. 4. We read Section 138 -181 of the Zoning By -Law as requiring one parking space for each 200 square feet of office space, but no additional parking spaces based on the number of employees, i.e. the building would be subject to the same parking recnlirements as for office use of a building generally. 5. Applicant presented a copy of the parking plan (EXHIBIT A), showing thirteen (13) spaces, of which twelve (12) meet the size requirements of the Zoning By -Law, one being undersized due to an encroachment of the aisle into one corner of the space. The Applicant stated that, while no additional screening is shown, it would try to save the screening which currently exists to the extent possible. The screening and landscaping shown on Applicant's plan is less than might otherwise be required, but it is an improvement on the present condition of the lot, which is in a state of some disrepair. Based upon the proposed use of space within the building, as shown upon a sketch plan presented to the Board, seventeen (17) spaces would be required under Section 139 -18 of the By -Law. 6. Two documents were entered into the record, one a letter from the Board of Selectmen, dated June 7, 1985, and one minutes of the Planning Board meeting of April 8, 1985, both urging the Board of Appeals to adhere to the parking requirements in the By- Law. One member of the Board would deny the relief on the grounds that Applicant did not prove an adequate basis for the requested waiver. 7. Applicant proposed restricting five (5) of the parking spaces to use by municipal vehicles, with the remaining spaces for use by members of the public doing business with the offices in the building, specifically prohibiting parking by employees working in the building. After discussion concerning the needs of the various departments to be housed in the building, two of which currently have reserved parking spaces for one employee each, the Board determined that such a prohibition would not be an appropriate condition of relief. 8. Applicant represented that the parking lot would be regraded but not hard surfaced, since there was no money in the renovation budget for the latter. A porous surface was considered more appropriate, and that the space could be delineated by the use of railroad ties or their equivalent. Ties set at the end of the spaces would encourage diagonal parking. Applicant was also requested to landscape the dead spots at the ends of the spaces, with the A & P Parking lot cited as an example of the kind which could enhance the area. 9. The Planning Board suggested the addition of a bicycle rack in the parking area to accommodate employees and members of the public who used that means of transportation. 10. Concern was expressed that the Owner of the building, if after the conversion was accomplished and the lease to the Town expired, the Town were unwilling or unable to buy the building, would then have waivers from parking requirements not limited to municipal use. The Board determined, therefore, to bar use of the building for multiple tenants or entities. 11. The Applicant stated, in response to an inquiry from Ms. Williams, that no traffic study had been done, and none would be provided, as Applicant had been requested at the hearing on its request for a Temporary Permit in this same matter. (See file 027A -90) . 12. The traffic in the area is already a problem. The additional flow as a result of the change in use of the building should not have an impact sufficient, under these circumstances, to warrant the denial of the relief requested. 13. For the reasons set forth, the relief requested by Special Permit under Sections 139 -18G and 33A was GRANTED, subject to the following conditions and specifications: A. The premises are to be used for offices only, initially restricted to municipal office use, and, thereafter, the Owner may only lease or allow the premises to be used by one enterprise or lessee; B. Parking shall be restricted to provide five (5) spaces for municipal vehicles and four (4) spaces for use by employees or heads of the departments housed in the building, one space per department for those departments not having use of municipal vehicles; C. The parking area shall be regraded and the entry, exit, and parking spaces marked with railroad ties,or equivalent; D. The parking shall be laid out and constructed substantially in accordance with the plan submitted by the Applicant (EXHIBIT A); E. To the extent necessary to allow for construction as specified in D (supra), waivers are granted from the aisle width, egress, and parking space size requirements of Section 139 -18C of the By -Law; F. Applicant is encouraged to add a bicycle rack in the parking area; G. The premises are to be used by and /or leased to one enterprise or lessee only; H. Waiver of screening is granted provided that the existing screening is to be maintained to the extent possible, and the Board reserves the right to require additional screening if the building ceases to be used for municipal offices. Other requested relief, being found unnecessary or inappropriate, is hereby denied. The vote was 4 -1 in favor of the relief, Ms. Williams being opposed. The Board members in favor reasoned that the proposed use, as conditioned by the Board's approval of the Special Permit was not substantially more detrimental than the present use, would be in harmony with the general purposes and intent of the Zoning By -Law, and that the relief requested should be granted because it would be physically impossible for the Applicant to provide parking as required by Section 139 -18 of the Zoning By- Law. The provision of thirteen (13) spaces in the Core District would be an improvement of the present situation for the municipal offices concerned. The design of the spaces, while not fully complying with dimensional the intended municipal use. The provide adequate safeguards for addressed by the Zoning By -Law, municipal offices will alleviate the Town. Dated: May 3C), 1990. Lin F Williams ba id J Le tt Dale W. Waine Al ,, -� G requirements, is adequate for conditions imposed should the protection of the interests and the use of the premises as some problems currently facing William R. Sherman"/ Michaol\ J . O'Mara J Form 3 -89 TOWN OF NANTUCKET BOARD OF APPEALS NANTUCKET, MASSACHUSETTS 02554 April /0 , 199 To: Parties in interest and others concerned with the decision of the Board of Appeals in Application No. 027 -90 of: TOWN OF NANTUCKET FOR ITSELF AND OWNER HARBORVIEW SHOPKEEPERS TRUST, MARIO TEIXEIRA, TRUSTEE TEMPORARY PERMIT Enclosed is the decision of the Board of Appeals which has this day been filed with the Nantucket Town Clerk. An appeal from this decision may be taken pursuant to Section 17 of Chapter 40A, Massachusetts General Laws. Any action appealing the decision must be brought by filing a complaint in court within twenty (20) days after this day's date. Notice of the action with a copy of the complaint and certified copy of the decision must be given to the Town Clerk so as to be received within such twenty (20) days. r �- c/Yryt- William R. Sherman, Chairman cc: Town Clerk Planning Board Building Commissioner . q NANTUCKET ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS NANTUCKET, MA 02554 At a public meeting on Friday, March 30, 1990, at 1:00 p.m. in the Town and County Building, Nantucket, on the informal Application (027 -90) of the TOWN of NANTUCKET having an address at Broad Street, Nantucket, MA 02554, for itself and owner HARBORVIEW SHOPKEEPERS TRUST, MARIO TEIXEIRA, TRUSTEE, the Nantucket zoning Board of Appeals made the following DECISION: 1. The Town seeks our Board's authorization of a Temporary Permit under zoning Bylaw Section 139 -26H for a nonconforming building to be used for Town offices under a lease - purchase agreement with the owner. We are asked to find it "necessary to promote the proper development of the community ". 2. The premises are located at the intersection of South Beach Street (currently one -way south) and Oak Street (two -way west of the intersection and one -way toward the east) and consist of unimproved corner lot (Assessor's Parcel 42.4.2 -27) and abutting improved lot (10 South Beach Street, Parcel 42.4.2 -70). See Land Court Plans 8755 -B (with Oak shown as "Town" Street) and 8755 -G (Lots 19 and 3 corresponding to Parcels 42.4.2 -27 and 70). The zoning district is Residential- Commercial in which municipal offices are a permitted use. Reference is made to Special Permit 114 -87 (Cf. 106 -87) granted 12/28/87 (and clarified 12/9/88) to the owner for contiguous Assessor's Parcel 42.4.2 -28. 3. Our finding is based upon the Town's letter of March 27, 1990 with accompanying copies of the Land Court plans and Assessor's map, a second copy of that letter with a parking plan shown on Lot 19, and viewings, together with testimony and representations at our meeting. 4. On this basis, we find that the proposed renovation of the concrete -block building (known as Harry Gordcn's garage) meets the test of Section 139 -26H as "necessary to promote the proper develpment of the community ". Town officials explained that certain Town departments are currently officed in three core -area buildings leased at burdensome rental rates. Town voters have not yet authorized expansion of the Town and County Building or other long -term provision for necessary office space. Leases are slated to expire July 1, 199u, _.nd so conversion of the garage building to office use must be undertaken promptly. One of the buildings presently used is unsafe or unhealthy. File No. 027 -90 5. The Temporary Permit is asked to allow a quick start and is to be followed by a formal application - and public hearing - upon zoning relief for the proposed municipal office use. The Town will then have proper plans for the building renovation and parking area (including landscape screening). The 3780 -SF footprint of the building will not be substantially enlarged. Its aesthetic design will be subject to review by the Historic District Commission. The parking area will be layed out with diagonal parking, legally to accommodate as many as 10 spaces and perhaps 16 usable. Entry off South Beach Street is proposed and exit onto Oak Street toward the very busy Easy Street, a critical artery carrying pedestrians, cars and freight to the Steamboat Wharf and beyond. 6. Impact upon traffic flow will be a principal concern, also any relationship between development of the premises and the commercial use of the owner's contiguous Parcel 42.4.2 -028 near the threshhold for a Major Commercial Development [Section 139- 9B(4)]. 7. Accordingly, by a favorable vote of all but member Williams, abstaining, this Board grants to Applicant Town of Nantucket the requested authorization for a Temporary, Permit under Section 139 -26H for the proposed conversion to municipal use. Such authorization shall expire in 2 months (on June /S, 1990) unless the Town has, prior to that date, made formal application to this Board for zoning relief for the premises, in which case the authorization shall continue during pendency of the proceedings for zoning relief. Also granted is a waiver of the $200 fee required for a formal application (to avoid purposeless internal Town accounting). Dated April `o, 1990 .- William R. Miermafi 'c. e J. O'M ra Dale W. Waine 2 - TOWN OF NANTUCKET ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Nantucket, Mass. 02554 At a public meeting on Friday, May 4, 1990, at 1:00 P.M. in the Town and County Building, Nantucket, on the Application (027- 90) of the TOWN OF NANTUCKET, Broad Street, Nantucket, Massachusetts, for itself and HARBORVIEW SHOPKEEPERS TRUST, MARIO TEXEIRA, TRUSTEE, owner, the Nantucket Zoning Board of Appeals -ade the following DECISION: 1. The Town seeks relief under Section 139 -33A of the Zoning By -Law for a change in use of a non - conforming building to be used for Town offices under a lease- purchase agreement with the owner. Relief for such purposes is also sought under the provisions of Section 139 -18G from the parking requirements of Sections 139 -18C, 18I, and 18(F)(1)(c). The existing parking is to be redesigned to provide thirteen (13) diagonal parking spaces in accordance with the plan appended hereto (EXHIBIT A). The building is currently being used as a moped and bicycle rental business under Special Permit 15 -79, and it is said to be non - ,7onforming as to side and rear setback, off- street loading facilities, screening, and open space. In addition, the Applicant is seeking a waiver of the filing fee. 2. The premises are located at the intersection of South Beach Street (currently one -way south) and Oak Street (two -way west of the intersection and one -way toward the east) and consists of an unimproved corner lot (Assessor's Parcel 42.4.2 -27) and an abutting improved lot (10 South Beach Street, Parcel 42.4.2 -70). Se Land Court Plans 8755 -B (with Oak shown as "Town" Street) and 8755 -G (Lots 19 and 3 corresponding to Parcels 42.4.2 -27 and 70 respectively). The zoning district is Residential- Commercial in which municipal offices are a permitted use. Reference is made to Special Permit 114 -87 (Cf. 106 -87) granted 12 /28/87 (and clarified 12/9/88) to the owner for contiguous Assessor's Parcel 42.4.2 -28. 3. Applicant and owner acknowledge, and the Board finds that the two lots in question were merged for zoning purposes, and, therefore, no waiver is required for off -site parking, despite the parking being on a lot assessed separately =from the lot upon which the building is situated. 4. We read Section 138 -18I of the Zoning By -Law as requiring one parking space for each 200 square feet of office space, but no additional parking spaces based on the number of employees, i.e. the building would be subject to the same parking recuirements as for office use of a building generally. 5. Applicant presented a copy of the parking plan (EXHIBIT A), showing thirteen (13) spaces, of which twelve (12) meet the size requirements of the Zoning By -Law, one being undersized due to an encroachment of the aisle into one corner of the space. The Applicant stated that, while no additional screening is shown, it would try to save the screening which currently exists to the extent possible. The screening and landscaping shown on Applicant's plan is less than might otherwise be required, but it is an improvement on the present condition of the lot, which is in a state of some disrepair. Based upon the proposed use of space within the building, as shown upon a sketch plan presented to the Board, seventeen (17) spaces would be required under Section 139 -18 of the By -Law. 6. Two documents were entered into the record, one a letter from the Board of Selectmen, dated June 7, 1985, and one minutes of the Planning Board meeting of April 8, 1985, both urging the Board of Appeals to adhere to the parking requirements in the By- Law. One member of the Board would deny the relief on the grounds that Applicant did not prove an adequate basis for the requested waiver. 7. Applicant proposed restricting five (5) of the parking spaces to use by municipal vehicles, with the remaining spaces for use by members of the public doing business with the offices in the building, specifically prohibiting parking by employees working in the building. After discussion concerning the needs of the various departments to be housed in the building, two of which currently have reserved parking spaces for one employee each, the Board determined that such a prohibition would not be an appropriate condition of relief. 8. Applicant represented that the parking lot would be regraded but not hard surfaced, since there was no money in the renovation budget for the latter. A porous surface was considered more appropriate, and that the space could be delineated by the use of railroad ties or their equivalent. Ties set at the end of the spaces would encourage diagonal parking. Applicant was also requested to landscape the dead spots at the ends of the spaces, with the A & P Parking lot cited as an example of the kind which could enhance the area. 9. The Planning Board suggested the addition of a bicycle rack in the parking area to accommodate employees and members of the public who used that means of transportation. 10. Concern was expressed that the Owner of the building, if after the conversion was accomplished and the lease to the Town expired, the-Town were unwilling or unable to buy the building, would then have waivers from parking requirements not limited to municipal use. The Board determined, therefore, to bar use of the building for multiple tenants or entities. 11. The Applicant stated, in response to an inquiry from Ms. Williams, that no traffic study had been done, and none would be provided, as Applicant had been requested at the hearing on its request for a Temporary Permit in this same matter. (See file 027A -90). 12. The traffic in the area is already a problem. The additional flow as a result of the change in use of the building should not have an impact sufficient, under these circumstances, to warrant the denial of the relief requested. 13. For the reasons Permit under Sections following conditions set forth, the relief requested by Special 139 -18G and 33A was GRANTED, subject to the and specifications: A. The premises are to be used for offices only, initially restricted to municipal office use, and, thereafter, the owner may only lease or allow the premises to be used by one enterprise or lessee; B. Parking shall be restricted to provide five (5) spaces for municipal vehicles and four -(4) spaces for use by employees or heads of the departments housed in the building, one space per department for those departments not having use of municipal vehicles; C. The parking area shall be regraded and the entry, exit, and parking spaces marked with railroad ties,or equivalent; D. The parking shall be laid out and constructed substantially in accordance with the plan submitted by the Applicant (EXHIBIT A); E. To the extent necessary to allow for construction as specified in D (supra), waivers are granted from the aisle width, egress, and parking space size requirements of Section 139 -18C of the By -Law; F. Applicant is encouraged to add a bicycle rack in the parking area; G. The premises are to be used by and /or leased to one enterprise or lessee.only; A. Waiver of screening is granted provided that the existing screening is to be maintained to the extent possible, and the Board reserves the right to require additional screening if the building ceases to be used for municipal offices. Other requested relief, being found unnecessary or inappropriate, is hereby denied. The vote was .4 -1 in favor of the relief, Ms. Williams being opposed. The Board members in favor reasoned that the proposed use, as conditioned by the - Board's approval of the Special Permit was not substantially more detrimental than the present use, would be in harmony with the general purposes and intent of the Zoning By -Law, and that the relief requested should be granted because it would be physically impossible for the Applicant to provide parking as required by Section 139 -18 of the.Zoning By- Law. The provision of thirteen (13) spaces in the Core District would be an improvement of the present situation for the municipal offices concerned. The design of the spaces, while nog fully complying with dimensional the intended municipal use. The provide adequate safeguards for addressed by the Zoning By -Law, municipal offices will alleviate the Town. Dated: May 3D , 1990. Linq,IL Fj Williams fba id "j/ LegVtt Dale W. Waine i CERTIFY' THAT 20 DAYS H� WAS FILED iN T.1-:F n HAVE ELAPSED AFTER THE DEC!S!ON N , �.. trICc 0 Ifi . OI;vY; CLE;K, t 1� APjpc„_ rd S ��EN Fi1cO � 'A THAT 40 A, SECTION 11 PERSD ANT To "`r�Ei' L LAY 0' ✓ ✓N CLE K requirements, is adequate for conditions imposed should the protection of the interests and the use of the premises as some problems currently facing �_z William R. Sherman / MichaA, j. o' Mara �( Form 3 -89 TOWN Or NANTUCKET BOARD OF APPEALS NANTUCKET, MASSACHUSETTS 02554 May 301 19 90 To: Parties in interest and others concerned with the decision of the Board of Appeals in Application No. 027 -90 of: TOWN OF NANTUCKET, FOR ITSELF AND HARBORVIEW SHOPKEEPERS TRUST MARIO TEXEIRA, TRUSTEE, OWNER Enclosed is the decision of the Board of Appeals which has this day been filed with the Nantucket Town Clerk. An appeal from this decision may be taken pursuant to Section 17 of Chapter 40A, Massachusetts General Laws. Any action appealing the decision must be brought by filing a complaint in court ••i ; _thin twenty (20) days after this day's date. Notice of Lir_ action with a copy of the complaint and certified copy of the decision must be given to.the Town Clerk so as to be received within such twenty (20) days. Willidm R. Sherman, Chairman cc: Town Clerk Planning Board Building Commissioner TOWN OF NANTUCKET ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Nantucket, Mass. 02554 April 12, 1990 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING A public hearing of the Zoning Board of Appeals will be held on Friday, May 4, 1990, at 1:00 P. M. in the Town and County Building, Broad Street, Nantucket, Massachusetts on the Application of: TOWN OF NANTUCKET, Broad Street, Nantucket, Mass. 02554, for itself and owner HARBORVIEW SHOPKEEPERS TRUST, MARIO TEXEIRA, TRUSTEE, Board of Appeals File No.0;0 -90 Seeking relief under the provisions of Section 139 -33A of the Zoning By -Law for a change in use of the building located at 10 South Beach Street, said to be non - conforming as to side and rear setback, off - street loading facilities, screening, open space, and off -site parking, and the adjacent lot, both currently used as a bicycle rental business under Special Permit 15 -79. The proposed use is as not more than 3,500 square feet of municipal office space. Additional relief is requested pursuant to Section 139 - 18G from the requirements of Sections 139 -18C (parking area and dimension requirements), 139 -18E (off -site parking), 18F(1) (screeneing and driveway width), and 139 -18I (Table of Parking Requirements). To the extent necessary, relief is sought from the requirements of the provisions of Sections 139 -16F (open space) and 139 -19 (off- street loading facilities). Waiver of the Application Fee is requested. The premises are located at 10 South Beach STreet, Nantucket, Assessor's Map 42.4.2, parcels 27 and 70, as shown on Land Court Plan 8755 -B, as Lot 3, and Land Court Plan 8755 -G, as Lot 19. The property is zoned Residential- Commercial. (&dg (-I v, 12 William R. Sherman, Chairma BOARD OF SELECTMEN Nancy J. Sevrens Chairman Lee Bourgoin Executive Secretary TO: Zoning Board of Appeals CC: Ron Santos Bernard Grossman Ted Tillotson, Esq. FROM: Lee Bourgoin DATE: April 12, 1990 ,,��IMIIIIIII UCje'P••• s ••�;p�OR�TEO ��``. p•IMNN�N�� TOWN OF NANTUCKET Town and County Building Nantuckct, NIA 02554 (508) 228-7255 RE: Application for Relief for 10 South Beach Street, with Supplemental Information Enclosed is a copy of the application which was submitted to you yesterday in less complete form on behalf of property owner Mario Texeira, trustee of Harborview Shopkeepers Trust, now with supplemental information and with the request amended to a request for a waiver for four (4) parking spaces. This is in response to helpful preliminary comments from Linda Williams and Spencer Cowan, Esq. Confirming our telephone conversation last night, you will continue to process this application so that it may come up at your meeting of May 4, 1990. On the issue of relief of parking space requirements, please see the enclosed concept plan for Town office use. This shows 3,703 square feet measuring from outside the building (envelope) and at least 400 square feet for storage space; at 200 square feet per parking space for a municipal office use (which is not commercial or industrial) this would mean no more than 17 parking spaces. Since 13 are to be available as shown, the request is for a waiver of four (4) spaces. The various other aspects of the relief sought are detailed in the attached revised copy of the application. A waiver of the fee is also requested as this would be payment from the Town back to the Town coffers. The assessor's list of parties in interest and mailing labels have already been provided to you. For your information, a 21 -E study is being undertaken by the owner to ensure that there is no problem in that regard. Thank you for your assistance. OF APPEALS Date BOA Form 1 -89 NANTUCKET ZONING COUNTYA BUILDING TOWN NT Mp 02554 NANTUCKET, CASE No pppL CATION FOR RELIEF owner' s name (s) : Mario Texeira jr. Rdl vvi• +-•- address' 35 Main Street, Nantucket MA 02554 Mailing Ted Tillotson for the Trust) Town of Nantucket (Atty. Applicant's name: 02554 in address: Selectmen's Office 16 Broad Street 42.4uZet70 27 Mailing Location of lot: Assessor's map and parcel number Street address: 10 South Beach Street — or Plan Fi1e8755 B +G Lot 19 & 3 Registry Land Ct Plan, Plan Bk & Pg district RR C Deed Ref 734, 50, 51 Zoning Date lot acquired: —j—j-- MCD? commercial: None _ or Uses on lot apartments rental rooms number of: dwellings_ duplex — C of O. N/A Building date(s): all pre -8/72? X or N/A Building Permit appl'n• Nos. Case Nos. all BOA applications, lawsuits: (15 -79) ht and respective Code sections ared to present State fully all zoning relief snug you propose comp_ per Section and subsections, specifically what y P and Section rounds you urge for BOA to make fPermit P and what 139-30A if a Special If appeal per 139 -3JA 139-32A grounds Variance, use). ach decision ox order appealed. OK to attach addendum if to—alter or extend a noncon�ormin a See attached addendum. 1 addendum lication: order structures art of this APP resent +planned Items enclosed as p X showing P HDC approved?N /A) Locus map X Site plan ro osed X elevationsGCR ( parking data Floor plans present P p setbacks sets- lot lot area frontage maling labels 2 sets Listing 'cap' covenant Assessor- cettif e o TownsofeNantuckete s Proof, Comr's record to BoA.) 5200 fee payable ask Town Clerk to send Bldg (If an appeal, requested information subeltundersthebpainslandy I certify that th e t f my knowle d g complete aril tr e to,- th penalties f_e ur,. Attorney /agent X Applicant �a tucket SIGNATUR Lee Bourgoin, Executive roof ar au`t��ori y� 3(If no owne or er's attorney, enclose p Relief i6 Lought pursuant to Chapter 1:39- --19A, that the Board make a finding that the change in use of the structure at 10 South Beach Street said to be nonconforming as to side and rear setback (139 -16C), Off- street loading facilities (139 -19), Screening (139 -18F, and Open Space (139 -16F), currently used as bike and moped rental operation, pursuant to Special permit (15 -79) to not more than three thousand five hundred square feet (3500') of Town offices is not substantially more detrimental to the neighborhood. It is believed that this change w -ll in fact be beneficial to the neighborhood and is in keeping with the Town's Goals and Objectives. The proposed change requires seventeen parking spaces be provided. Additional relief is sought pursuant to 139 -18G from sections 18C, 18I; and 18(F)(1)(c) as the existing parking is to be redesigned as follows, one entrance on South Beach Street, thirteen 45 degree angled spaces, a one way aisle fifteen feet in width except for a two foot intrusion by space 917 for approximately ten feet, and an exit on Oak Street anticipated to be slightly less than twenty feet in width, final design width subject to the Traffic Safety Committee. Said redesign to provide for a safer, more convenient and accessible parking lot. Care will be taken to maintain existing screening and trees. Relief from 139 -18I. The applicant requests the Board make a finding that municipal use as Town offices are not commercial in nature and therefore not subject to the additional parking requirements of 139-i8i for employees. If the Board is unable to make such a finding than relief from said section is also sought. The parking is to be for the exclusive use of the public having business in the town offices on site and town owned vehicles. Employees of the Town, County and State shall be restricted from parking on the lot. During non business hours parking shall be restricted to Town owned vehicles only. Waiver of application fee is requested as the cost would be borne by the Town and be submitted to the Town. i 3 / cJ �cai,„ S -P.c.( (,�es),