HomeMy WebLinkAbout118-88TOWN OF NANTUCKET
BOARD OF APPEALS
NANTUCKET, MASSACHUSETTS 02554
January 31, 1989
File No. 118 -88
To: Parties in interest and others
Re: Decision in the Application of:
RICHARD MAULDIN
Enclosed is the decision of the Board of Appeals which has this
day been filed with the Nantucket Town Clerk.
An appeal from this decision may be taken pursuant to Section 17
of Chapter 40A, Massachusetts General Laws. Any action appealing
the decision must be brought by filing a complaint in court within
twenty (20) days after this date. Notice of the action with a copy
of the complaint and certified copy of the decision must be given
to the Town Clerk so as to be received within such twenty (20)
days.
William R. Sherman, Chairman
cc: Building Commissioner
Planning Board
Town Clerk
NANTUCKET ZONING
BOARD OF APPEALS
NANTUCKET, MA 02554
At a public hearing on Friday, January 13, 1988, at
1:00 p.m. in the Town and County Building, Nantucket, on
the Application (118 -88) of RICHARD MAULDIN having an
address at P.O. Box 14, 11 Bank Street, Siasconset, MA
02564, the Nantucket zoning Board of Appeals made the
following DECISION:
1. Applicant seeks a Special Permit under zoning Bylaw
Section 139 -33A to convert an existing 2 -story garage
building into a secondary dwelling in ownership separate
from the principal dwelling; and, in the alternative, a
variance from the 5,000 -SF minimum lot size required by
Section 139 -16A to allow division of his 7,790 -SF lot into
one lot with at least 2,210 SF and the remainder with at
least 5,000 SF, each to be validly buildable when in
separate ownership, the variance also giving relief from
the 50 -foot minimum frontage requirement, if needed, to
allow the smaller lot with as little as 26 -foot frontage.
2. The premises are at 11 Bank Street (aka Jackson
Street), Codfish Park in Siasconset, Assessor's Parcel
73.1.3 -067, Land Court Plan 39172 -A, zoned Residential -1.
3. Our frindings are based upon the Application papers
including plan dated August 1975, updated to 12/10/86 (our
Exhibit "A"), correspondence, and representations and
testimony received at our hearing.
4. As shown on Exhibit "A ", Applicant's lot is of an
unusual shape, both a through lot extending between Bank
Street and Codfish Park Road and a corner lot at the
intersection of Codfish Park Road (26' frontage) and
Fawcett Way (123' frontage). Counsel for Applicant
characterizes Fawcett Way as private and thus the 126'
frontage along it is not available to meet the minimum 50'
requirement. (Exhibit "A" shows Fawcett as a "public
way ".) We are told that the nearly square portion of the
lot on Bank Street, containing the principal dwelling, was
acquired about 1947. The generally trapezoidal corner lot
portion was acquired 6/27/58, the two portions
overlapping slightly at their interior corners.
5. Exhibit "A" carries the legend on the garage building
112 -story wood -frame apartment over garage ". That building
as well as the principal dwelling is represented as
pre- dating 1972 zoning adoption. The garage building is
set off from the southerly lot line between 3' and 41, a
side yard setback of 5' being required. We find,
File No. 118 -88
therefore, that the garage building constitutes a
pre- existing, nonconforming use, for which Special Permit
relief under Section 139 -33A may be available.
6. If Applicant were simply seeking to activate the
apparently dormant apartment use over the garage,
consistency with our concurrent decision in 122 -88 might
lead to a favorable result. There, as here, the garage
building is in the side -yard setback and the required
off - street parking is available. The most evident
distinction, besides Applicant's insistence on separate
ownership, is the much larger size of the 122 -88 lot. But,
even there as here, an abutter's building was located just
beyond the property line and within the setback.
7. As we understand the original purpose of allowing a
secondary dwelling on a lot, it is to accommodate a family
situation such as Applicant's where two related households
would occupy the respective principal and secondary
dwellings. Here, however, Applicant asks separate
ownership, apparently to facilitate his son's financing
the conversion of the garage into a secondary dwelling.
This would directly contradict the provisions of Section
139- 7A(2)(f), opening by precedent the secondary dwelling
provisions well beyond their present scope, and thus not
allow us to find the requisite harmony with the general
purpose and intent of the zoning Chapter 139. Additional,
the secondary dwelling would not, as required in
subparagragh (d), comply with all other zoning Bylaw
regulations, e.g., side -yard setback. However detrimental
relief would be to the immediate neighbors, it would be
very detrimental to the larger neighborhood in its
precedential impact.
8. Accordingly, the requested relief by Special Permit
must be denied. Even more clearly must we deny the
alternative request for relief by Variance allowing
creation of an undersized lot. That would directly
contradict the provisions and purpose of the Section
139 -16A lot size requirements', as well as our numerous
decisions contrary to Applicant's arguments for relief.
Although lot shape is unusual, no hardship involved here
arises from the shape of the lot. We simply can not make
any of the findings required for variance relief. The
Planning Board, in its unfavorable recommendation,
characterizes Applicant's request as "so alien to the
spirit of the Town Code."
9. Upon a motion to grant the requested relief in either
alternative, the vote of this Board was unanimous in the
negative. Relief is, therefore, DENIED.
- 2 -
File No. 118 -88
Date January J) 1989
P e ey William R. Sherman
Ro t J. eic ter
Dale W. Warne
- 3 -
SOA Form 1 -87
ARPESCATTON'.<
NANTUCKET ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS ( "BOA ")
0
)wner's name(s): Richard Mauldin
Bailing address: Post Office Box 14 11 Bank Street Siasconset MA 02564
kpplicant's name : Richard Mauldin
Bailing address:
Location of lot(s): Assessor's map and parcel: 313 -067
Street address 11 gank Street ot I
Registry LC PL, BBC AX & RG, n FL 39172 -A Lot Deed ref. g
Endorsed --
/_ /_, ANR? No
Subdivision No
Date tot(s) acquired: 6/ 27/58 Zoning district R1
Number of dwelling units on lot(s): _
One Rental guest dooms None
Commercial use on lot(s): None
MCD? No
Bdilding date(s): all pre -'72 zoning? Yes or
Building permit application- Nos. and dates PRE' 72 Zoning C of 0? No
Case No(s). or dates all prior BOA applications:
None
State fully all zoning relief sought together with all respective Code sections
and subsections, specifically, what you propose compared with present and
what grounds you urge, for BOA to make each finding per Section 139 -32A if
Variance, -30A if Special Permit, -33A if to alter or extend non - conforming
use, or to reverse Building Inspector by,Y ,App eal per -31A & B:
Applicant seeks relief in the form of a Special Permit under Section §139-37A
for the conversion of a re- existin non - conforming garage into a dwelling which will
not be under the same ownership as the principal dwelling, or in the alternative,
relief in the form of a Variance under Section §139 -32A for relief from the intensity
regulations of Section-§139-16 so as to reduce the minimum lot size requirement of
5 000 square feet to 2,210 square feet and to reduce the minimum frontage requirement
of 50 feet to 26.14 square feet If the Variance is granted, the applicant will be allows
bdivide his Property so as to create two buildable lots with appropriate conditions.
Enclosures forming part of this Application: Supplement do above
Site /blot plan(s) with present /proposed structures
Locus map XX Floor plans present /proposed Appeal record'
Needed: areas frontage setbacks GCR% parking data_______
Assessor's cer f * d addressee list (4 sets): XX . Maifing label sr ,�2:�sets).,Xx
Fee check for $%5 �:ay
able to Town of Nantucket XX !'Cap" covenant
I certify that the requested information submitted is substantially complete
and true' to t best m k. Vledge• ..under pains' and penalties _6f perjury
Signature:
Applicant Attorney /Agent x_