The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About072-88NANTI DECISION: At a public hearing oz -S on Monday, July 11, 1988 at 4:00 p.m. in t.... and County Building, Nantucket, on the Application (072 -88) of the Town of Nantucket, Broad Street, Nantucket, MA 02554. 1. Applicant seeks a Special Permit under zoning Code Section 139 -33A to alter and extend the existing SIASCONSET WASTEWATER TREATMENT FACILITIES substantially as shown and described in EPA Project Number C250- 473 -03 in Town records. The premises are located at 24 'Beach Road; Assessor's Parcels 74 -052, 74 -059 through 74 -068, and 74 -073; Plan Book 3, Page 3,Blocks 30, 6, 24 and Lots 25, 5, 4, 26, 27, 3, 2(sewer beds) and - (beachland); in the zoning district Limited Use General -3. 2. Our findings are based upon the Application papers including the Location Plan and Drawing Index dated 9/12/86, Sheet 2 of 16 (our Exhibit "A") and correspondence, representations and testimony received at our hearing of July 11, 1988 to which the matter was continued. We note that Applicant's payment of the usual application fee was waived by our unanimous vote to avoid purposeless Town accounting. 3. According to Applicant's representatives, the proposed upgrading to a primary wastewater treatment facility for Siasconset is a culmination of years of planning and facilities rehabilation pursuant to Federal and State grants. Much of that concerned Town center and Surfside facilities: see related application 073 -88. Amoung the new Siasconset structures will be preliminary treatment facilities and primary clarifiers. With these, most solids are removed from the flow arriving via the 10" and 12" sewer lines coming to the site. The clarified liquid will then be passed on to infiltration basins, the 6 of them being formed as rectangular sand pits. As liquid percolates through the sand below the basins, purification occurs by anaerobic processes, in a manner comparable to the higher level secondary treatment process. Solid sludge accumulated in the clarifiers is to be removed periodically, taken to the Surfside treatment facility for co- composting and conversion into a benign soil additive. 4. By contrast, the existing facility, which long predates 1972 adoption of zoning, involves no clarifiers. Waste water is simply run into sewer beds from the outfall ends of the existing sewer lines, without prior treatment. 5. Where the existing access road is unpaved, Applicant proposes to provide a paved roadway to the control building. Now, tank trucks used in pumping out solids accumulated in private Siasconset septic systems dispose of this pumpage directly into the sewer beds. The proposed facility will have a receiving station for such pumpage and treat it first in the clarifiers. Management of the facility is provided for in a single -story control building to have a 16' x 21110" footprint. New monitoring wells will be placed on the site to assure against ground water contamination beyond the area where a Class 3 rating of ground water applies. To safeguard against unauthorized entry into the infiltration basins, a 6 -foot high vinyl- coated, chain -link fence will surround them. 6. Abutters and others who expressed their views were concerned with visual impact of the facility, with odors, and with continued passage to the beach via the access road. Applicant undertakes to do extensive revegatation and add native plantings for a maintainable, natural screening of the fencing, control building and associated structures. To meet requirements of the Nantucket Conservation Commission ( "ConCom ") and for security and insurability, Applicant's ability to lower the profile of the fence is limited. Color of cladding will be selected to be relatively unobtrusive. Applicant must meet the aesthetic requirements of the Historic District Commission ("HDC") for all structures seen by the public. Applicant further undertakes to keep passable the connection between the paved access road and the unimproved way to the beach. Finally, the facility will have a sludge holding tank covered so that improved odor control may be achieved. 7. Planning for the project has been subject to extensive State and Federal review, Town Meeting approvals obtained and extensive opportunity given for prior public input. The high level of available State and Federal funding gives further evidence that the facility is in the public interest. Delay occasioned by failure of needed local approvals puts such funding at risk. Applicant, we understand, has a legal obligation to provide proper wastewater treatment and so might face heavy burdens if relief were denied. The Planning Board's recommendation was favorable. 8. We have no difficulty in finding that the relief sought is in harmony with the general purpose and intent of the zoning code, notably, to promote public health. Indeed, the zoning code is anomolous in not characterizing such - 2 - uses. In any event, the Siasconset facility long predates 1972 adoption of zoning and so is permitted under Section 139 -33A as a 'grandfathered` use. As required for a Special Permit under that Section, we further find that the proposed upgrading to a primary treatment facility will not be substantially more detrimental to the neighborhood than the existing facility, upon the condition that Applicant extend its best efforts to minimize adverse visual impact of the new facility consistent with safety, security, insurability and applicable requirements of governmental agencies including the HDC and ConCom. 9. Having made the requisite findings, this Board by UNANIMOUS vote grants to Applicant the requested Special Permit pursuant to Section 139 -33A, subject to the above -noted condition. Dated July 2�ij 1988 QACY_A_�� I Ak C. Mar hall Beale W Ann Balas i - 3 - iamm R.,/,Sherman v d egge • M TOWN OF NANTUCKET BOARD OF APPEALS NANTUCKET, MASSACHUSETTS 02554 July 2 "y, 1988 Re: Decision in the Application of SIASCONSET WASTEWATER TREATMENT FACILITIES (072 -88) Enclosed is a notice of the Decision of the BOARD OF APPEALS which has this day been filed with the Town Clerk. Any appeal from this action shall be made pursuant to Section 17 of Chapter 40A of the General Laws, and shall be filed within twenty (20) days after this date. cc: Building Commissioner Planning Board Town Clerk William R. Sherman, Chairman BOARD OF APPEALS COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS Nantucket, ss Noel Thompson VS. Superior Court Civil Action No. 88 -35 William R. Sherman, C. Marshall Beale, and Dale W. Waine, as they are Members of the Nantucket Board of Appeals, and the Town of Nantucket JUDGMENT ON FINDINGS BY THE COURT This action came on to be heard on Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment before Carey, .J., and after Findings being duly filed, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED: Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment is ALLOWED. erk /Magistrate Form of Judgment Approved ! /"J-,Ij, 4 C rey, J. Dated at Nantucket this vj�- day of December., 1988. .l n THOMAS A. LA TANZI LAWRENCE O. SPAULDING, JR. DUANE P. LANDRETH HARRY SARKIS TERKANIAN ERIC K. RASMUSSEN DANA A. BERRY JAN M. E. BONE JOHN P. MCCORMICK DONALD TWOMEY LISA M. BARR LA TANZI, SPAULDING a LANDRETH ATTORNEYS AT LAW P. O. BOX 2300 ORLEANS, MASSACHUSETTS 02653 TELEPHONE: (508) 255 -2133 TELEFAX: (508) 255 -3786 August 11, 1988 Patricia R. Church, Clerk Nantucket Superior Court Nantucket Court House Broad Street Nantucket, Ma 02554 ON NANTUCKET: P.O. BOX E 22 FEDERAL STREET NANTUCKET, MA 02554 TELEPHONE: (508) 228.0555 TELEFAX: (508) 228 -0512 ROBERT F. MOONEY. OF COUNSEL WILLIAM H. BROWN II Re: Noel Thompson v. Nantucket Board of Appeals, C.A. No. Dear Ms. Church: Enclosed please find a complaint with exhibits, cover sheet and appropriate filing fee for the above - referenced case. Kindly docket and file same. Thank you for your attention to this matter. Very truly yours, John P. McCormick JPM /jb Enclosure cc: Mr. Noel Thompson l'uf. Ao* I k/. 1/ i <, .r. TYPE OR USE BALL POINT PEN - MASSACHUSETTS TRIAL COURT SUPERIOR COURT DEPARTMENT CIVIL ACTION COVER SHEET NANTUCKET SS. (To be filed with each Complaint) NO. PLAINTIFF(S) NOEL THOMPSON DEFENDANT(S)WILLIAM R. SHERMAN, C. MARSHAL BEALE, MICHAEL O'MARA, ROBERT LEICHTER, DALE WAINE DAVID LEGGETT AND ANN BALAS ATTORNEY(S) (Firm Name, Address, Tel.) John P. McCormick ATTORNEY(S) (If known) as they comprise the LaTanzi, Spaulding & Landreth NANTUCKET BOARD OF APPEALS and theTOWN P.O. Box 2300, 8 Cardinal Lane OF NANTUCKET BBO #Orleans, MA 02653 ( 508) 255 -2133 Place an ® in one box only ORIGIN K 1. F01 Complaint ❑ 4. F04 Dist. Ct. Appeal c.231, s.97 ❑ 2. F02 Removal to Sup. Ct, c.231, s.104 ❑ 5. F05 Reactivated after Rescript; Relief from judgment /order (Mass. R. Clv. P. 60) ❑ 3. F03 Retransfer to Sup. Ct. c.231, s.102C Place an ® in one box only NATURE OF ACTION CONTRACT REAL PROPERTY MISCELLANEOUS ❑ A01 Services, labor and materials ❑ C01 Land taking (eminent domain) ❑ E02 Appeal from administrative agency, ❑ A02 Goods sold and delivered CO2 Zoning appeal, G.L. c.40A G.L. c.30A ❑ A03 Commercial paper ❑ CO3 Dispute concerning title ❑ E03 Action against Commonwealth or Municipality, G.L. c.258 ❑ A08 Sale or lease of real estate ❑ C04 Foreclosure of mortgage ❑ E04 Taxpayer suit, G.L. c.40 s.53 ❑ A99 Other (specify) ❑ C99 Other (specify) ❑ E05 Confirmation of arbitration awards, G.L. c.251 TORT EQUITABLE REMEDIES r_1 E06 Massachusetts Antitrust Act, ❑ B03 Motor vehicle negligence- personal ❑ D01 Specific performance of contract G.L. c.93 injury /property damage ❑ E08 Appointment of receiver ❑ B04 Other negligence - personal Injury ❑ D02 Reach and apply, G.L. c.214, ❑ E09 General contractor's surety bond, property damage s.3(6) -(9) G.L. c.149, ss.29, 29a ❑ B05 Products liability ❑ D06 Contribution or indemnification ❑ E10 Summary process appeal ❑ B06 Malpractice- medical ❑ D07 Imposition of trust E] Ell Workman's Compensation El B07 Malpractice -other El D08 Minority stockholder's suit ❑ E12 Small Claims Appeal (specify) ❑ D10 Accounting ❑ E13 Labor Dispute ❑ B08 Wrongful death, G.L. c.229, s.2A ❑ D12 Dissolution of partnership ❑ E14 Chapter 123A Petition — SDP ❑ B15 Defamation (libel - slander) ❑ D13 Declaratory judgment, G.L. c.231A ❑ E15 Abuse Petition, G.L. c.209A ❑ B99 Other (specify) ❑ D99 Other (specify) ❑ E16 Auto Surcharge Appeal ❑ E17 Civil Rights Act, G.L. c.12, ss.11 H -1 RN / IS THIS A JURY CASE? El YES O ❑ E99 Other (specify) SUPERIOR COURT RULE 29. Requirement of statement as to money damages to prevent the transfer of civil actions to District or Municipal Court Departments. 1. Superior Court Rule 29, as amended requires the statement of money damages on the reverse side be completed. 2. Failure to complete the statement, where appropriate, will result in transfer of this action (Superior Court Rule 29(2). SIGNATURE OF ATTORNEY OF RECORD CTE: gust 15, (OFFICE USE ONLY —DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE) RECEIVED 1988 DISPOSITION BY: A. Judgment Entered B. No Judgment Entered DATE: ❑ 1. Before jury trial or non -jury hearing ❑ 6. Transferred to District Court [3 2. During jury trial or non -jury hearing under G.L. c.231, sl02C DISP ENTERED ❑ 3. After jury verdict BY: ❑ 4. After court finding DATE: ❑ 5. After post trial motion Disposition date CLERK'S OFFICE COPY mtcoo4-02/86 LATANZI. SPAULDING &LANDRETH ATTORNEYS AT LAW ON CAPE COD: P.O. BOX 2300 ORLEANS. MA 02653 TELEPHONE: (508) 255 -2133 ON NANTUCKET: P.O. BOX E 22 FEDERAL STREET NANTUCKET. MA 02554 TELEPHONE: (508) 228 -0555 COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS NANTUCKET, SS. NOEL THOMPSON, Plaintiff V. WILLIAM R. SHERMAN, C. MARSHALL BEALE, MICHAEL O'MARA, ROBERT LEICHTER, DALE WAINE, DAVID J. LEGGETT, and ANN BALAS, as they comprise the NANTUCKET BOARD OF APPEALS, and the TOWN OF NANTUCKET, Defendants NANTUCKET SUPERIOR COURT C.A. No. COMPLAINT PARTIES 1. The plaintiff Noel Thompson (hereinafter "Thompson ") is an individual with a residence at Low Beach Road in the Siasconset area of Nantucket, Nantucket County, Massachusetts. 2. The defendants in this action are the members of the Nantucket Board of Appeals (hereinafter "Board ") a governmental body with an office at the Nantucket Town Hall, Nantucket, Nantucket County, Massachusetts. The defendant members of the Board and their addresses are as follows: a. William R. Sherman 31 Nonantum Avenue Nantucket, MA 02554 b. C. Marshall Beale 11 Primrose Lane Nantucket, MA 02554 C. Michael O'Mara 240 Polpis Road Nantucket, MA 02554 wuuzeA If GafAul A i6 iiAd f�.�r. LATANZI, SPAULDING &LANDRETH ATTORNEYS AT LAW ON CAPE COD: P.O. BOX 2300 ORLEANS, MA 02653 TELEPHONE: (508) 255 -2133 ON NANTUCKET: P.O. BOX E 22 FEDERAL STREET NANTUCKET, MA 02554 TELEPHONE: (508) 228 -0555 d. Robert Leichter Old South Road Nantucket, MA 02554 e. Dale Waine Bishops Rise Nantucket, MA 02584 f. David J. Leggett 262 Madaket Road Nantucket, MA 02554 g. Ann Balas 66 Center Street Nantucket, MA 02554 3. The defendant Town of Nantucket (hereinafter "Town ") is a governmental entity, and was the successful applicant for a special permit in this case. The town has an agent of service through the Nantucket Town Clerk at Broad Street, Nantucket, MA 02554. JURISDICTION AND VENUE 4. This action is an appeal of the Board of Appeals: granting of a special permit pursuant to the provisions of Mass. G. L. c. 40A, §17, and is commenced in the Nantucket Superior Court, since the subject property is located in Nantucket County. HISTORY OF ACTION 5. Thompson owns a home and other property directly abutting the existing Siasconset Wastewater Treatment facilities located at 24 Beach Road, as shown as Assessor's Parcels 74 -052, 74 -059 through 74 -068 and 74 -073; Plan Book 3, Page 3, Blocks 30, 6, 24 and Lots 25, 5, 4, 26, 27, 3, 2 (sewer beds and beachland) (hereinafter "the property "). -2- LATANZI, SPAULDING & LANDRETH ATTORNEYS AT LAW ON CAPE COD: P.O. BOX 2300 ORLEANS. MA 02653 TELEPHONE: (508) 255 -2133 ON NANTUCKET: P.O. BOX E 22 FEDERAL STREET NANTUCKET. MA 02554 TELEPHONE: (508) 228 -0555 6. Thompson's parcels are more particularly described in deeds recorded at the Nantucket County Registry of Deeds at Book 165, Page 235 and Book 205, Page 200. 7. The Town petitioned the Board for a special permit pursuant to Nantucket Zoning Code §139 -33A to alter and extend its existing wastewater treatment facilities. A copy of the general plan for the project is attached hereto as Exhibit "A ". 8. On July 11, 1988, the Board conducted a public hearing and voted to approve the special permit. 9. The Board's decision was filed with the Nantucket Town Clerk on July 29, 1988. A certified copy of that decision is attached hereto as Exhibit "B ". CAUSE OF ACTION 10. As a direct abutter to the subject property, Thompson is an aggrieved party within the meaning of Mass. G. L. c. 40A, §17. 11. At the public hearing, Thompson, through counsel, appeared before the Board to express concerns regarding the intrusion of the new facility into a residential area, the adverse visual impact of the facility, the noxious fumes and odors associated with the facility, and problems relating to access through a new paved roadway used for this facility. 12. The project cannot be constructed without creating a substantial detriment to the neighborhood, in terms of visual -3- LATANZI, SPAULDING & LANDRETH ATTORNEYS AT LAW ON CAPE COD: P.O. BOX 2300 ORLEANS, MA 02653 TELEPHONE: (508) 255 -2133 ON NANTUCKET: P.O. BOX E 22 FEDERAL STREET NANTUCKET, MA 02554 TELEPHONE: (508) 228 -0555 impact, noise, noxious odors, increased vehicular travel throughout the neighborhood, and a diminution in residential property values throughout the neighborhood. 13. In granting a special permit allowing construction which would result in a substantial detriment to the neighborhood, the Board was clearly erroneous, and exceeded its authority. 14. By permitting this project despite the legitimate concerns raised by abutters and other neighbors, the Board acted arbitrary and capriciously. 15. By granting the special permit without imposing conditions which would answer the concerns of the abutters, the Board acted arbitrarily and capriciously. 16. The granting of this special permit derogates from the purpose and intent of the Nantucket By -law. 17. As a direct and proximate result of the Board's actions, Thompson will be directly and substantially harmed in the quiet of enjoyment of his property, in the adverse impact upon the quality of life in his home, in the adverse impact upon the neighborhood in general, and in the diminution in property value of his home and that of the entire neighborhood. court: WHEREFORE, Thompson respectfully requests that this 1. Annul the decision of the Nantucket Board of Appeals and declare it to be of no force and effect; -4- 2. Award him all costs of this action, including (reasonable attorneys fees; 3. Order such other relief as this court deems meet and just. Dated: August 15, 1988 LATANZI, SPAULDING & LANDRETH ATTORNEYS AT LAW ON CAPE COD: P.O. BOX 2300 ORLEANS. MA 02653 TELEPHONE: (508) 255 -2133 ON NANTUCKET: P.O. BOX E 22 FEDERAL STREET NANTUCKET, MA 02554 TELEPHONE: (508) 228 -0555 Respectfully submitted, Thompson, by his attorney, John P. McCormick LaTanzi, Spaulding & Landreth P.O. Box 2300 8 Cardinal Lane Orleans, MA 02653 (508) 255 -2133 -5- r- (71�: BOARD OF APPEALS TOWN OF NANTUCKET NANTUCKET, MASSACHUSETTS 02554 DECISION: At a public hearing of the BOARD OF APPEALS on Monday, July 11, 1988 at 4:00 p.m. in the Town and County Building, Nantucket, on the Application (072 -88) of the Town of Nantucket, Broad Street, Nantucket, MA 02554. 1. Applicant seeks a Special Permit under zoning Code Section 139 -33A to alter and extend the existing SIASCONSET WASTEWATER TREATMENT FACILITIES substantially as shown and described in EPA Project Number C250- 473 -03 in Town records. The premises are located at 24 'Beach Road; Assessor's Parcels 74 -052, 74 -059 through 74 -068, and 74 -073; Plan Book 3, Page 3,Blocks 30, 6, 24 and Lots 25, 5, 4, 26, 27, 3, 2(sewer beds) and - (beachland); in the zoning district Limited Use General -3. 2.`Our findings are based upon the Application papers including the Location Plan and Drawing Index dated 9/12/86, Sheet 2 of 16 (our Exhibit "A") and correspondence, representations and testimony received at our hearing of July 11, 1988 to which the matter was continued. We note that Applicant's payment of the usual application fee was waived by our unanimous vote to avoid purposeless Town accounting. 3. According to Applicant's representatives, the proposed upgrading to a primary wastewater treatment facility for Siasconset is a culmination of years of planning and facilities rehabilation pursuant to Federal and State grants. Much of that concerned Town center and Surfside facilities: see related application 073 -88. Amoung the new Siasconset structures will be preliminary treatment facilities and primary clarifiers. With these, most solids are removed from the flow arriving via the 10" and 12" sewer lines coming to the site. The clarified liquid will then be passed on to'infiltration basins, the 6 of them being formed as rectangular sand pits. As liquid percolates through the sand below the basins, purification occurs by anaerobic processes, in a manner comparable to the higher level secondary treatment process. Solid sludge accumulated in the clarifiers is to be removed periodically, taken to the Surfside treatment facility for co- composting and conversion into a benign soil additive. 4. By contrast, the existing facility, which long predates 1972 adoption of zoning, involves no clarifiers. Waste water is simply run into sewer beds from the outfall ends , t� , / y of the existing sewer lines, without prior ..ieatment. 5. Where the existing access road is unpaved, Applicant proposes to provide a paved roadway to the control building. Now, tank trucks used in pumping out solids accumulated in private Siasconset septic systems dispose of this pumpage directly into the sewer beds. The proposed facility will have a receiving station for such pumpage and treat it first in the clarifiers. Management of the facility is provided for in a single -story control building to have a 16' x 21110" footprint. New monitoring wells will be placed on the site to assure against ground water contamination beyond the area where a Class 3 rating of ground water applies. To safeguard against unauthorized entry into the infiltration basins, a 6 -foot high vinyl- coated, chain -link fence will surround them. 6. Abutters and others who expressed their views were concerned with visual impact of the facility, with odors, and with continued passage to the beach via the access road. Applicant undertakes to do extensive revegatation and add native plantings for a maintainable, natural screening of the fencing, control building and associated structures. To meet requirements of the Nantucket Cdnservation Commission ( "ConCom ") and for security and insurability, Applicant's ability to lower the profile of the fence is limited. Color of cladding will be selected to be relatively unobtrusive. Applicant must meet the aesthetic requirements of the Historic District Commission ("HDC") for all structures seen by the public. Applicant further undertakes to keep passable the connection between the paved access road and the unimproved way to the beach. Finally, the facility will have a sludge holding tank covered so that improved odor control may be achieved. 7. Planning for the project has been subject to extensive State and Federal review, Town Meeting approvals obtained and extensive opportunity given for prior public input. The high level of available State and Federal funding gives further evidence that the facility is in the public interest. Delay occasioned by failure of needed local approvals puts such funding at risk. Applicant, we understand, has a legal obligation to provide proper wastewateV treatment and so might face heavy burdens if relief were denied The Planning Board's recommendation was favorable. 8. We have no difficulty in finding that the relief sought is in harmony with the general purpose and intent of the zoning code, notably, to promote public health. Indeed, the zoning code is anomolous in not characterizing such - 2 - -2 uses. In any event, the Siasconset facility long predates 1972 adoption of zoning and so is permitted under Section 139 -33A as a 'grandfathered` use. As required for a Special Permit under that Section, we further find that the proposed upgrading to a primary treatment facility will not be substantially more detrimental to the neighborhood than the existing facility, upon the condition that Applicant extend its best efforts to minimize adverse visual impact of the new facility consistent with safety, security, insurability and applicable requirements of governmental agencies including the HDC and ConCom. 9. Having made the requisite findings, this Board by UNANIMOUS vote grants to Applicant the requested Special Permit pursuant to Section 139 -33A, subject to the above -noted condition. Dated July 29 1988 Qj�-/ C. Mar hall Beale Wi iam R.>Sherman Ann Balas David. •eggg t i A T,�ue Al1irl. fir. �, z'iluE NOTICE A Public Hearing of the BOARD OF APPEALS will be held on FRIDAY, JULY 8, 1988 at 1:30 p.m. in the TOWN AND COUNTY BUILDING, FEDERAL AND BROAD STREETS, NANTUCKET, on the Appli- cation of TOWN OF NANTUCKET (072 -88) seeking a SPECIAL PERMIT under SECTION 139 -33A to alter and extend the SIASCONSET WASTEWATER TREATMENT FACILITIES substantially as shown and f described in EPA Project Number C250- 473 -03 in the Town records. The premises are located at 24 LOW BEACH ROAD, Assessor's Parcel 74 -052 (non- contiguous) and 74 -059 through 74 -068 and 74 -073, Plan Book 3, Page 3, Blocks 30, 6, 24 and Lots 25, 5, 4, 26, 27, 3, 2, 28, (Sewer Beds) and - (Beachland), zoned LIMITED USE GENERAL -3. I VinTlF. Williams, Secretary BOARD OF APPEALS M Form 1 -87 owner's name(s): ARPEICATION' NANTUCKET ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS ( "BOA ") Mailing address: _ applicant's name Mailing address: _ .location of lot(s): Street address Town of Nantucket Broad Street Town of Nantucket Broad Street Assessor's map and parcel: Map 74 Pagcels 52, 59 - 68, 73 v Registry LC PL,.PL BK & PG, PL FL Lot Deed ref. Subdivision Endorsed /_ /_ ANR? )ate tot(s) acquired: _ /_ /_ Zoning distri t LUG 3 lumber of dwelling units on lot(s): N/A Rent 1 guest Looms N/A :,ommercial use on lot(s): No MCD? No 3uilding date(s): all pre -'72 zoning? No or Building permit application-Nos. and dates N/A C of 07 N/A :ase No(s). or dates all prior BOA applications: state fully all zoning relief sought together with all respective Code sections and subsections, specifically, what you propose compared with present and Winnt nrnit"Act unto »rou_ fnr RnA to makra aarh findina nPr Sectinn 1.39 -32A if Variance, -30A if Special Permit, -33A if to alter or use, or to reverse Building Inspector by,,Appeal per 33A Expansion of Sewer Treatment facilities as described in EPA extend non - conforming -31A & B: Project Number C250- 473 -03. j I