HomeMy WebLinkAbout005-88�4n cs -�
TOWN OF NANTUCKET
BOARD OF APPEALS
NANTUCKET, MASSACHUSETTS 02554
Fsz.lo a j !- CW9
Re: L 4111" pF- (reti4e67cUv �r-88J
Enclosed is a notice of the Decision of the BOARD OF
APPEALS which has this day been filed with the Town
Clerk.
Any appeal from this action shall be made pursuant to
Section 17 of Chapter 40A of the General Laws, and
shall be filed within twenty (20) days after this date.
BOARD OF APPEALS
�A
BOARD OF APPEALS
TOWN OF NANTUCKET
NANTUCKET, MA 02554
The Board of Appeals at a public hearing held on Friday, JQoVkrC Zy,
1988, at 1:30 p.m. in the Town and County Building, Nantucket, made the follow-
ing Decision upon the Application of Lu Ann DeGenaro V05-?S), address of
13 Quaker Road, Nantucket, Massachusetts.
1) Applicant has sought a VARIANCE under Zoning By -Law Section 139 -32A
for relief from the sideline setback provisions of Section 139 -16. Relief
has been specifically sought to cure the existing nonconformity of a structure
completed in 1982 and for which a Certificate of Occupancy exists, but which
is located approximately 8.9 feet away from the westerly side line at its
closest point. The premises is in the LUG -1 zoning district, which has a 10-
feet sideline setback requirement.
The lot is situate at 19 East Creek Road and is shown as Parcel
No. 60 on Assessor's Map No. 55, and on Land Court Plan No. 37342 -A.
2) Our findings are based upon the Application papers, plans, testi-
mony and representations received during and before our February 3, 1988,
hearing.
3) In support of Applicant's request for a VARIANCE under Section 139 -32
we find as follows:
Owing to circumstances relating to soil conditions, shape or
topography of the land or structures, but not affecting generally the zoning
district in which it is located, a literal enforcement of the sideline setback
requirements of Section 139 -16 will work a substantial hardship, financial or
otherwise, on the Applicant.
The said existing structure was built in 1982 after approval for
construction was obtained from the appropriate local authorities including
the Nantucket Building Department and the Nantucket Conservation Commission.
Because a substantial portion of the lot is wetlands to the east of the struc-
ture and the topography to the west is steeply sloped, siting the house was,
no doubt, a difficult task. Adding to the complexity of the problems, the
house was designed and placed upon pilings. To site the pilings, the Applicant
engaged a professional surveyor. Throughout she relied in good faith upon
w
her professionals. Indeed, the error was not discovered until a recent mortgage
plot plan was done.
It is our understanding from Applicant's representations that the
area in violation is approximately 4 square feet. The area, within the struc-
ture, affected is the only full bathroom not within a bedroom in the house.
Therefore, although the offensive portion of the structure is small, its re-
moval would create a substantial hardship on the Applicant. Furthermore, we
believe that moving the house toward the wetland would be impractical and
probably would not be welcomed by the Conservation Commission. We find further
that allowing this structure, which has existed in this spot for several years,
to remain "as is" does not derogate from the By -Law's intent and purpose and
will not cause detriment to the public good, provided conditions which will
lessen the impact of the use of this lot to the abutting property are imposed
as set out below.
THEREFORE, upon a motion duly made and seconded, this BOARD voted
UNANIMOUSLY to grant Applicant relief by VARIANCE to reduce so much of the
sideline setback requirement on the westerly side of the premises to cure the
existing nonconformity as to sideline setback for the existing single - family
dwelling structure which stands approximately 8.9 feet away from the westerly
sideline at its closest point. Such relief is conditioned, however, upon the
F, C_:. e- r"7" A_
Owner /Applicant's planting thirty (30) ar-bQwrit-Ae plants along her westerly
boundary so as to further screen the existing house (which planting need not
be immediate but shall be done by 8/1/88); AND upon there being no second
dwelling being placed or constructed on the locus.
Dated: February 9, 1988
William Sherman
Dale Waine
C. Mar hall Beale
i�
64 a r- dp?)
NOTICE
A Public Hearing of the BOARD OF APPEALS will be held on
FRIDAY, JANUARY 29, 1988 at 1:30 p.m. in the TOWN AND COUNTY
BUILDING,, FEDERAL AND BROAD STREETS, NANTUCKET on the Applica-
tion of LU ANN DEGENARO (005 -88) seeking a VARIANCE i:om the
10 -foot side lot line setback required by SECTION 139 -16C to
validate 1982 siting of a single - family residence 8.9 feet from
the southwesterly side lot line. The premises are located at 19
EAST CREEK ROAD (fronting on SPRUCE STREET), Assessor's Parcel
55 -060, Land Court Plan 37342 -A, zoned LIMITED USE GENERAL -1.
Wi liam herman, C airman
BOARD OF APPEALS
BOA Form 1 -87
AAPEICATIOW7
NANTUCKET ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS ( "BOA ")
Owner's name(s):
Mailing address:
No v 00 -
Applicant's name Same as above
Mailing address: it if it
Location of lot(s): Assessor's map and parcel: Map #0055. Parcel # 060
Street address 19 East Creek Road
Registry LC PL, P%xMx&x cxRixAFL 37342 -A Lot Deed ref.
Subdivision Endorsed Li/8 / 71 ANR? Yes
Date Lot(s) acquired: LL/j2/_,L Zoning district LUG 1
Number of dwelling units on lot(s): One Rental guest rooms None
Commercial use on lot(s): None MCD? No
Building date(s): all pre -'72 zoning ?. No or dwelling built 1982
Building permit application- Nos. and dates 2/82 C of 0? Yes
Case No(s). or dates all prior BOA applications: None
State fully all zoning relief sought together with all respective Code sections
and subsections, specifically, what you propose compared with present and
what grounds you urge, for BOA to make each finding per Section 139 -32A if
Variance, -30A if Special Permit, -33A if to alter or extend non - conforming
use, or to reverse Building Inspector byyAppeal per -31A & B:
Applicant seeks a Variance pursuant to Section 139 -32A for partial relief from the 10' side
line setback requirements of 139 -16. If granted the Applicant will be allowed to maintain an
existing dwelling built in 1982 and which is 8.9 feet from the southwesterly sideline at its
closest point.
Enclosures forming part of this Application: Supplement bo above
Site /plot plan(s) x with present /g=pPAad structures
Locus map x Floor plans present /proposed Appeal:record'
Needed: areas per morWc t$goet plan setbacks GCR% parking dsta�
Assessor's certified addressee list (4 $eta): V . X-. Mailing Labefso.(2. A4s
Fee check for $150.00 payable to Town of Nantucket x {:Cap" covenant~
I certify that the requested information submitted is substantially complete
and true-to a �iowledge-,�.under'pains'and penalties..of perju rX�
Signature: s j Applicant Attorney /tx / /
(Tf nrnt Atm Y_ _%z!Hrtw1Wn a4 a fnr attti%nri *v^ 4 hnerAn�i 1 ',