HomeMy WebLinkAbout091-86�oz
TOWN OF NANTUCKET C %�
BOARD OF APPEALS
NANTUCKET, MASSACHUSETTS 02554
October 21, 1986
Re: ALAN COSTA, ARTHUR MCCABE, II AND MILES SIEGAL (091 -86)
Enclosed, please find notice of a decision of the BOARD
OF APPEALS which has this day been filed with the Town
Clerk.
Any appeal from this action shall be made pursuant to
Section 17 of Chapter 40A of the General Laws, and shall
be,.-filed within twenty (20) days after this date.
William R. Sherman, Chairman
BOARD OF APPEALS
BOARD OF APPEALS
TOWN OF NANTUCKET
NANTUCKET, MASSACHUSETTS 02554
DECISION:
The BOARD OF APPEALS, at a Public Hearing held on TUESDAY,
OCTOBER 7, 1986 at 1:30 p.m. in the Town and County Building,
Nantucket, made the following Decision on the Application of ALAN
COSTA, ARTHUR McCABE, If AND MILES SIEGAL (091 -86) address One
Washington Mall, Boston, MA.
1. Applicants seek a VARIANCE from intensity regulations,
SECTION 139 -16A and C of the Zoning Code, to cure existing non -
conformities of sub - minimum lot size, insufficient frontage,
setbacks and ground cover ratio. These are said to result from
creation of the premises as a separate lot via an ANR subdivision
per plan dated April 28, 1980. The premises are located at 7R
OCEAN AVENUE, Siasconset, Assessor's Parcel 73.2.4 -054, Lot 3 of
Plan File 9 -A, Book 208, Page 252, in the RESIDENTIAL-OLD-
HISTORIC zoning district.
2. Our findings are based upon the Application papers,
viewings, and plans, testimony and representations received at
our hearing of September 5, 1986. The matter was taken under
advisement and carried from our hearing of October 3rd to that of
October 7, 1986, enabling counsel to submit his memorandum of law
under cover of October 6, 1986. The Application form did not
particularize the various non - conformities listed above which,
for clarity, were included in the notice of our hearing.
Evidence received is insufficient to allow us to find what are
the existing side and rear yard setbacks (5 feet being required)
1
and ground cover ratio (30% the maximum in this instance) except
by scaling from the 1980 plan. Lot 3 per the plans has an area
of 1564 square feet with no frontage. Received with counsel's
memorandum is a copy of prior deeds confirming a perpetual
easement "for foot travel" and utilities 10 -foot wide, opening to
20 feet at Cottage Avenue.
3. Applicants' counsel would have us grant variances in
these respects without a showing of hardship other than resulted
from the election of subdivider Ewing to carve up the Summer
House pre -1955 cottage complex (formerly the Moby Dick Cottages)
with each cottage on a sub - minimum lot. This was 8 years after
zoning was in effect, the premises then passing by successive
sales to Applicants. Counsel makes no showing of uniqueness
within the ROH district by reason of lot shape (rectangular),
topography (flat), or soil condition (unexceptional).
4. Instead Applicants respond to our citation of Arrigo v.
Planning Board of Franklin, 429 N.E.2d 355 (1981) by arguing that
it is not on point, and that there is not a single case in
Massachusetts that deals with the question here. Applicant
attempts to distinguish Arrigo as involving M.G.L. c. 41, sec.
81R where Planning Board approval of a subdivision was required
and depended on its discretion as to subminimum frontage.
Arrigo, however, clearly holds that whether or not a Planning
Board approves a subdivision, zoning compliance remains an
independent issue for Zoning Board of Appeals consideration. In
noting that two independent approvals are required, the Court
characterized that by the Board of Appeals as one:
"which may vary the frontage requirement only under
2
the highly restrictive criteria of M.G.L. ch. 40A,
sec. 10. The action of neither board should, in
our view, bind the other, particularly as their
actions are based on different statutory criteria."
5. Applicants' counsel further asserts that:
At the time of Ewing's sale in 1981 and at the time
McCabe purchased in 1983, it was the collective
opinion of the Nantucket Bar Association that these
lots, although undersized, were to be treated in
the same fashion as undersized grandfathered lots
with buildings because they were created by
statute;....
We do not argue with counsel's conclusion that Ewing and
subsequent transferors acted in good faith. For that very
reason, we have granted variance relief to other innocent
purchasers of substandard lots created by ANR subdivision based
upon pre -1955 dwellings per M.G.L. c. 41, sec. 81L. Where we
have granted variance relief_ in such circumstances, however, we
first satisfied ourselves that the paramount concerns of zoning,
especially safety, were also met. Where frontage and vehicular
access were barely adequate for emergency vehicles, we
conditioned relief on no expansion of the use. We have denied
relief where the Section 81L ANR subdivision was recently proposed
with inadequate frontage, access, etc. We are not satisfied here
that the granting of the variance as applied for would be
consistent with the zoning concerns which we must take account of
by statutory directive.
6. Many of the lots created by the Ewing subdivision have
50 -foot or at least 20 -foot frontage. Were we to accept
counsel's argument, zoning relief would be available as a matter
of right even if Ewing had elected lot lines, as Section 81L
allows, but leaving all the lots with no frontage and even no
3
vehicular easement.
7. So far as we understand, the "big" cottage here
benefitted from grandfathering provisions until the 1981 sale out
of Ewing's ownership in common with other lots of the
subdivision. Continued zoning non - conformities did not then, nor
now, legally bar transfer to successive owners, subject or not to
mortgage encumbrance. Counsel has not argued that Applicants'
occupancy permit may lawfully be withdrawn because of the zoning
violations. Clearly, Applicants may not alter or expand the
structure nor improperly intensify the use. Yet, they have what
they paid for, i.e., the use and enjoyment of the premises.
8. As the Court stated in Smalley v. Planning Board of
Harwich, 10 Mass. App. Ct. 599 (1980), involving two lots with
pre- Subdivision Control Law buildings and subdivided ANR under
M.G.L. c. 41 sec. 81P:
"Thus, Section 81P was ... to provide a simple
method to inform the register that the [planning]
board was not concerned with the plan ... to
relieve certain divisions of land of regulation and
approval by a planning board ('approval ... not
required') because the vital access is reasonably
guaranteed ...."
(We note here that Nantucket's fire trucks and ambulances have
generally a 12 -foot width.) The Court continued:
"Nor can we say that the recording of a plan showing
a zoning violation, as this one does, can serve no
legitimate purpose. The recording of a plan such
as plaintiff's may be preliminary to an attempt to
obtain a variance, or to buy abutting land which
would bring the lot into compliance, or even to
sell the non - conforming lot to an abutter and in
that way bring it into compliance. In any event,
nothing that we say here in any way precludes the
enforcement of the zoning by -law should the
recording of her plan eventuate in a violation."
F11
See also Planning Board of Nantucket v. Board of Appeals, 448
N.E.2d 778, 781 (App. 1981), holding that a planning board's
endorsement of an ANR plan under Section 81P gave the subdivision
lots no standing under the zoning by -laws. Such an endorsement
is not a declaration that the proposal is in any way satisfactory
to the Planning Board, or that it does not violate the applicable
zoning by -laws. 28A Massachusetts Practice, Real Estate, Section
848. This disposes of Applicants' efforts to distinguish Arrigo
from this case on the grounds that Arrigo involved a plan subject
to discretionary approval by the Planning Board. The purposes
behind the subdivision control law are entirely independent of
and separate from those behind the Zoning Enabling Act.
9. We find in Smalley reason here to stress the non-
conformity of Applicants' lot with respect to frontage and
vehicular access. Access by 10 -foot wide footpath is in no way
within our power to validate by variance relief. In order to
grant the variance sought by Applicants under M.G.L. c. 40A, sec.
10, Applicants must establish, and we must find, all of the
prerequisites required by statute that: (1) owing to circum-
stances relating to the soil conditions, shape, or topography of
the land or structures and especially affecting such land or
structures but not affecting generally the zoning district in
which it is located (2) a literal enforcement of the provisions
of our zoning by -law would involve substantial hardship, finan-
cial or otherwise, to Applicants, and (3) desirable relief can be
granted without substantial detriment to the public good and
without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent or
5
purpose of our zoning by -law. See also the Zoning Code, sec.
139- 32(A). We are unable to make these findings based on the
record before us.
10. Upon motion to grant the requested relief, this Board
voted UNANIMOUSLY in the NEGATIVE. Relief is accordingly DENIED.
Dated: October 21, 1986u �• ✓G'� �9
William R. Sherman
seo'e 4�wl6lzze'
Dorothy D. Vollans
CA' Cvv
C. M rshall B a
M
13
NOTICE
A Public Hearing of the BOARD OF APPEALS will be held on
FRIDAY, SEPTEMBER 5, 1986 at 1:30 p.m. in the TOWN AND COUNTY
BUILDING, FEDERAL AND BROAD STREETS, NANTUCKET, on the Applica-
tion of ALAN COSTA, AUTHER MC CABE, II. AND MILES SIEGAL (091 -86)
seeking a VARIANCE from SECTION 139 -16 to cure technical defects
including insufficient lot size, frontage, setback and ground
cover ratio resulting from a property division dated May 12, 1980,
into 13 lots with respective pre -1955 dwellings. The property is
located in CODFISH PARK, 7R OCEAN AVENUE, SIASCONSET, ASSESSOR'S
PARCEL 73.2.4 -054, Lot 3, Plan File 9 -A, Book 208, Page 252, and
zoned RESIDENTIAL -OLD - HISTORIC.
William R. Sherman, Chairman
BOARD OF APPEALS
_ . W id \ _
O J r-
C C.
uli
t/' 1
CP
4Z 56 W _
56 N
�--� -
\ V ' I -\ co
\ V • \
+
co
--
\ A r� \
cn
O It I
� U
.31-62 ,
—'� S 16 5!' 29 ��.
W
TC'T,.,rV CF 1\T.6,pTTuCYET
-,:.7oard of n.ppeals
List of parties in interest in the matter of the petition . of:
le
am e:
Address:
Property address: 73.
ell
recent applicable T4X list.
to t
Assessor
Town of Nantucket
»� �SSFSSCR'S DA7A FILE 1UPDATED- E�I
PARCEL
NAME & BILLING ADDRESS
....... ... ... ........ ........ ... .... ........ .... ... ... .... ........ ........ .... -- .... ........ ... ........ ... ....... ............... ....... ....... ....... ............. --- ........ ................. ..... ........ ........ ....... ... ....
�------------
7331-0131 MAST JOSEPH CARL ETAL
*CHAHGEn 2(/ GR[EMBRTAR LN
AM|�ERST NH 03Q31 LUTS 2 P/' PV 01 PP 73 ' 12�
*CHANGED 3 LIGHTHOUSE LN
OLD GREENWICH CT 06870 LOT 6 PL PK 21 PS
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
7331'018 BLOCK ELIZABETH TURNER 1. kO(3EP W 0021 %Fny 04[
C/O WILLIAMS HYERS ETA!
*CHANG[D 882 17 ST NW
WASHINGTON DC 20006
7331-055 GRIGGS LAWRENCE T & SY{.VIn
«CHkNGE0 44 CLAYPIT HILL 00 BK-00171 PE-002 op/ /79
OAYLAND MA 01778
_
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
7331'078
* |`[NROSE CLEMENT
A
HAFZY
*CI. K\NGFD
910 WADDJN8TON
RD
B(-00112
PS-151
Q1/ /5�
BIRMINGHAM
Ml
48009
LOT 5 FL
8K 1 PS
8`
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
7331-080
CDNNELL .1O\1N B
& KINC/\lD
0(���
*CHAHGFD
DKOOK RD
BK-(�01S3
P(�-�`71
(�7/ /91 -
WARREN
VT
05671
LOT 6 K PT
8 PL
BY 1 PP 39
7311-082 ARNESS ALLAN S & ./UDI04
*CHANGED 40 LOEFFiER RD P215 sK / 16,
0'OOMFIELD C[ 06002 iCT 10 & E HALF LU! 1?
^ ASZESSOR'S
»ATA FIiE
4UPDA7[D-
!lout/
GREENE ST
9K-00181 PS-299 01/ /81
NEW
...... ................... .... - .... ............................
... ....... ...
... .............. .... .... .... ... ....... ............... ......................
....... ........................ ... ....... ... ....... ........ ........ .... ---------_----_
7331-103
GARDNER
PHILIP C ETUX E7AL
0012 COTTAGE nVE
*CHANGEP
VlU-AGE
GREEN
��-��1�1 PS-257 12/O//7'
8FDFORD
NY
P� L3� � PL nK � P� p^
-' 7331-118 ----BR[ER EEYTINA &
PETER
*CHANGED 45
GREENE ST
9K-00181 PS-299 01/ /81
NEW
YORK
NY 10013
LOT 5 PL FL 9-A
7331-119 HERON JEAN E TR 0000 COTTAGE AVF
C/O DINGHY REAL ESTATE T
*CHANGED 5 COTTAGE AVE f!K-00183 PS-127 06/ /81
SIASCONSET MA 02561 LOT 6 PL FL 9-A
--- 7331-120 -- LEVINE-JOAN �� �-- - 0()10 sRnM! AVE
C/O DALE KEVIN
*[]fANGED W}�LERS LN 9K-002% PS-015 09/23/81 t1O7,O0("
+NANlUC{ET MA 02�51 LOT 7 PL
7331-121 SMEA JOHN & PE7TIBONE LAUR) 0001 COTTAGE AY�
GELFAND KENNEKT FF1150!
*CHANGED 6 E 43 ST 9K-00181 PS-301 01/ /81
----- - ----NEW 'YORK NY 10017 LO7 9 F1' FL 9-A
7331-122 SANDY R1}BEN FAMILY TRUST
C/O GOLD JG ETAL TR
*CHANGED 2040 AVE OF THE STARS EK-00209 PG-027 12/ /g'
LOS ANGELES CA 90067 LOT 12 F1' FL 9-A
DATA FILE :UPDATFD- »7/��/�� �!��/� ()F
PARCEi NAME & BILLING ADDRESS P�UPE��y �E�C /\H��
........ ... - ........ ........ ...... .... ... ........ .... ... ........ ........ ...... ........ ....... ----- .................. - .... ............... - ... ....... ........................ ...
-------------~-��r-------
7324-032 0 1") 7
«[3|AHGED VILLAGF RD �K-����� PS-221 ��/ /31
NFW VERNON NJ C7971 LOT l Pi FL 9-A
7324-O53 HARE ,X]SEP|{ H - 00 �)9
C/O BALDWIN R W JR
*CHANGED 1525 MILLERSVILLE RD 9K-001S1 PS-216 o4/ 1
MILLERSVILLE MD 21108 LOT 2 PL FL 9-A
'-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
' - -
7324-055 PINSKY HARVEY FTAL
«CHANGED 359 BERLIN RD PK-00191 PS-261 1o/ /92
DOLTON MA 01710 LOT 1 PL FL 9-n
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
7331-100
HILLER HERBERT
H JR & VEYANNE F
0010
C8TTASE /\VE
*CHANSFD
1 GREENLEY RD
�K-
PSY'101
/ /�1
NEW CANAAN
CT 06810 LOTS 6,7
& 1/2 OF
8
'`ASpESSOR'S DA[A FILE O|U`DATED- 07/20/04 TOWN ()F
{`ARCEL HAME & 8ILLIHG AD0RES� !`�(�PERTY �F�C ��!��`��
--....... ........ ... .... ........ ........ ........ ----------... .... .... -------------------........ .... - ...... ........ ....... ....... ........ ........ .... .... _------------
7324-023 BRIHTON CHARLES W EST OF 0010 OCEAN A%*:
*CHANGED PK-00110 PS-511 07/ /13
NANTUCKET MA
7324-028 -DALY'DANIEL D & MARIE R 0(01 ORIDGE ST '
APT 3-H
*CHANGED 274 FIRST AVE' CEPT-()005113 / /67
NEW YORK NY 10009 LC PL 6929-A
7324-0441 WHITLOCK STUART H & SUSAN k 0001 ELBOW LN
*CHANG[D JERSEY LN
PK-00169
PG-167
02/01/79
MANCHESTER
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
MA 01911 LO7
1 PL
BK
20 PG 59
7324-045 DALY DANIEL D & MARIE K
APT 3-H
0001 BRIDGE ST
*CHANGED 274 FIRST AVE 3K-00131 PS-259 / /67
NEW Yorm my locol?
'--------'
----------
---------------
FlNHEiV MICHAEL
STE 222
696 E COLORADO
PASADENA
---------------
FINNELL MICHAEL
STE 222
696 E COLORADO
PASADENA
---------
H & KULSIA
0'VU
CA 91101
---------
H & >(ULHA
BLVD
CA 91101
----------------------------
PATRICIA F 0002 OCEAN AVE
CERT-0005070 / /�2
L(7[ 2 LC PL 2567A-A
----------------------------
PATRICIA F 0002 OCEAN AVE.:
CER[-0005070 / /12
LOT F LC PL 9595-n nELOW RAH!
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
FIHH8l MICHAEL H in PATRICIA F 0002 OCEAN AV�
STE 222
���AHG 696 E COLORADO BLVD
\ PASADENA CA 91101 LOT F LC PL 9595-A
\
\` u�
- _
'' ASSESSOR'S DATA FILE =PDAlFD- 07130186 TOWN CK'
7324-015 BRINTON CHARLES W EST OF 0p10 OCEAN nVE
*CHANGED BK-001iO PS-011 07/ /43
NANTUCKET HA 02551
'----------------------------------------------------------------------------
7324-0181 EWING DAVID E 0016 OCEAN A�/F
C/O SANDY RB
UEN FAH[LY T
*CHANGED 2040 AVE OF THE STARS CFNT-0009119 01/ /80
CENTURY CITY CA 9()06/ LOT 13 LC PL 9595-H
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
^
7324-0182 LARSEN FUND INC
TIME-LIFE BLDG
«CHANGED ROCKEFEii[R PLAZA CFNT-9006793 91/ /9(�
NEW YORK NY 10020 LOT 14 LC Pi 959541
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
L�KSEN FUND INC
TIME-LIFE BLDr�',
FD
1:Z .1<1 PLAZA CE�T-0006393 01/ /20
NEW YORK NY 10020 LOT 15 LC Pi 95950H
/
7324-0184
*[�HANGFD
BIDS JOHN R
50 HANSON RD
DARIEN
CERI-0209717 07/ 18:�.
CT 06820 LOT 12 LC PL 9595-H
.
PARCEL
.... ... ........
........ ........ ........ ........
HAME & BILLING ADDRESS
........ ........ .... .... .... .... ........ ....... ...... ..... ........ ........ ................ ------...
... ................
PP�PE�TY
........... ... - ... ........................
�E�C ���/
- .... .... - .... ....
�
.... ---��-----
SANDY RUBEN FAMILY 1Ri/ST
0001
mnC>!DL}A
C/O GOLD JG ETAL TR
D
2040 AVE OF THE STARS
121 /93
l
�
LOS ANGELES CA 90067
LOT 13 PL
FU 9-;';
...................
7324-014
.... ...
--------------------------------------------------------------------
FINNELL MICHAEL H & KUUHA
PATRICIn
F 0002
GULiY R�
STE 222
*CHANGED
696 E COLORADO BLVD
CERT-0005070
/ /42
PASADENA CA 91101
L87 3 LC
PL 256l1-A
7324-015 BRINTON CHARLES W EST OF 0p10 OCEAN nVE
*CHANGED BK-001iO PS-011 07/ /43
NANTUCKET HA 02551
'----------------------------------------------------------------------------
7324-0181 EWING DAVID E 0016 OCEAN A�/F
C/O SANDY RB
UEN FAH[LY T
*CHANGED 2040 AVE OF THE STARS CFNT-0009119 01/ /80
CENTURY CITY CA 9()06/ LOT 13 LC PL 9595-H
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
^
7324-0182 LARSEN FUND INC
TIME-LIFE BLDG
«CHANGED ROCKEFEii[R PLAZA CFNT-9006793 91/ /9(�
NEW YORK NY 10020 LOT 14 LC Pi 959541
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
L�KSEN FUND INC
TIME-LIFE BLDr�',
FD
1:Z .1<1 PLAZA CE�T-0006393 01/ /20
NEW YORK NY 10020 LOT 15 LC Pi 95950H
/
7324-0184
*[�HANGFD
BIDS JOHN R
50 HANSON RD
DARIEN
CERI-0209717 07/ 18:�.
CT 06820 LOT 12 LC PL 9595-H
.
AB -1
FEE $100.00
Case No
APPLICATION TO THE BOARD OF APPEALS
To the Members of the Board of Appeals:
Nantucket, Massachusetts
The undersigned hereby applies for relief from the terms ut: the
(ZONING BY- LAW)(BUILDTNG CODE) on property described below:
Location of Property 7R Ocean Avenue Siasconset
Lot No. 3 _ _ - - ^_ Plan No. _Plan File 9 - -A _(_73.2._4- 054)_
District is zoned for Residential Old Historic '
Type of structure (Existing or Proposed) or proposed use: existin
Owner's Narne Alan Costa, Auther McCabe,II, Miles Siegal
Owner' s Address One Washington Mall Boston, MA
When did you acquire this property? December 23, 1983
Has application been filed at building Department? No
Has anv previous appeal been made? No
Section of By -I,aw or Code from which relief is requested: 139 -16 and 139 -32
ftea,,;on for asking relief: Applicant seeks a VARIANCE from 139 -16 of the
Nantucket Zoning By -laws (Intensity, Regulations) to cure the technical defect resulting
from the creation of the subject premises via a subdivision.as shown on a plan of
land prepared for David E. Ewing dated April 28, 1980 and recorded at Nantucket
Registry of Deeds Plan File 9 -A.
Si na ure of plicant
James K. Glidden Attorney for
�licant
ATTACH: (1) A list o�f� n arnes a dresses of each abutOpllj <;.,r ..er
and owne u g the abutters.
(2) A check in the amount of $100. 00 made payable to t-.!:c_-
of Nantucket.
(3) Four copies of the application and a snap or plat, s1Io,.; is1g
the location of the property to be considered.
(a) If the applicant is other than the owner, pleasc indic,.,te
your authority to make this application.
BOARD'S DECISION
Application submitted to Board V` gp
Advertising dates
!searing date(s)
Decision of Board
Decision filed with the Town Clerk
Aq
417~- zae