Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1984-June-22MINUTES Board of Appeals A Public Meeting of the BOARD OF APPEALS was held on Friday, June 22, 1984 in the Town and County Building, Federal and Broad Streets, Nantucket only for the purpose of making decisions. Present were Andrew Leddy, Chairman, Eileen Cahoon and Lydle Rickard, Regular Members, and Linda Williams and Harold Taylor, Alternates. The minutes of the meeting of June 15, 1984 were adopted without public reading. The Application of HOLDGATE AND COLLETTI, CONSTRUCTION CO. (037 -84) was DENIED. Mr. Leddy and Mr. Rickard did not sit on this case because of conflict and pending hospitalization. The reasons for the denial were: the projected plant was within the Aquafer, it was in an area designated LUG -3, not RC. This BOARD has no ,4L jurisdiction overriances; it is an addition, not an expansion of a pre- existing, non - conforming use.and is substantially more det- rimental to the neighborhood. Peter Fenn, Esq., speaking for the Land Council, wished to go on record complaining that a brief was excluded from the materials on this case. The Chairman told him that it was due to a misunder- standing with Wayne Holmes as to the admissability of additional materials. The Application of HOLLAND AND VAUGHAN (0,4Z-84) was GRANTED. Andrew Leddy stepped down from this case because of conflict. He will not sit on cases involving fellow lawyers. Linda Williams sat instead. A question was asked concerning an increase in ground cover. Yes, there will be more, but not over the limit. About 700 Sq. Ft. It will be entirely lawyers' offices: for two more lawyers and a secretary. Will more parking be needed? No. People will walk, bike, etc. The Application of MODERN CONTINENTAL ENTERPRISES (0-4S-84) was DENIED. Andrew Leddy did not sit because of conflict with a client. -2- June 22, 1984, cont. Harold Taylor sat in his stead. Mr. Rickard questioned, can the BOARD grant a temporary permit. Yes, legally, but supposing they are late, asked Mr. Michael Driscoll, do you then grant an extension? Ms. Cahoon and Mr. Rickard voted against the plant as being substantially more detrimental to the neighborhood. Mr. Harold Taylor voted for it because he feels the road work needs to be done. Mr. Leddy brought up several items of Old Business: Did the BOARD approve of both the Variance and the Special Permit for the Martys? YES. There was a lawyer's clerical error. The Marty decision was then signed. Hatch's: a very different understanding of "storage" next to the package store. Now a gift shop, a fish market ? ?? 'Sconset Cafe: needs a public hearing to change conditions of the Permit. Not possible to modify the decision of the BOARD off the record. Brant Point Courtyard: was given a Special Permit last year to reconstruct an old building. Time's run out. There are deed constraints. What would be the procedure; do they need a public meeting for an extension. EXTENSION GRANTED on the same conditions and terms as before. Their attorney should draw up an appropriate document. There being no further business, the meeting was ADJOURNED. nZy e 4v J 'k-