HomeMy WebLinkAbout085-13 8 Charter StreetTOWN OF NANTUCKET
BOARD OF APPEALS
NANTUCKET, MA 02554
Z ti
n o
Z w
APPLICATION
m
rn
N
n
d
—i
rT
Fee: $300.00 File No. L 3
z 3
m
Joseph W. Fole and Harris K. Doliner
Owner's name(s): P Y
� w
m w
Mailing address: clo VDH &B, P.C. 2 Whalers Ln., P.O. Box 659, Nantucket, MA 02554
cn
Phone Number. 508 - 228 -4455 E-Mail rick�vdhlaw.com
Applicant's aame(s): same
Mailing Address: same
-
Phone Number. same �MaiL• same
Locus Address: 8 Charter Street Aaxsaor's Map/parcel: 42.3.2/165
Land Court Plan /Plan Book & Page /Plan File No.: We
Bk. 1407,
Deed Reference /Certificate of Tide: Pe. 327 Zoning District R -OH
Uses on Lot- Commetdal: None X Yes (describe)
Residential Number of dwellings 1 Duplex Aparnnems
Date of Structurs(s): all pre-date 7/72 'Les_ or
Building Permit Numbers:
Previous Zoning Board Application Numbers: 017-85;093-00
ICI
ii
y
Ri Iji+?�
2 Fairgrounds Road Nantucket Massachusetts
02554 _..
.._
508- 228 -7215 telephone 508- 228 -7298 fa c a im i I
State below or attach a separate addendum of specific special permits or variance relief applying for.
See Addendum, attached hereto as Exhibit "A ".
I certify that the information contained herein is substantially complete and true to the
best of my knowledge, under the pains and penalties of perjury.
SIGNATURE: Owner*
Joseph W 5oley and Hards_1J)nLiner
Richard Beaudette, Attorney for Joseph W. Foley and Harris K. Dollner
*If an Attorney or other Agent is representing the Owner or the Applicant, please provide a signed
proof of agency.
OFFICE USE ONLY
Application received on:JJ— By:_ Complete:_ Need Copies:_
Filed with Town Clerk -/ -/_ Planning Board: —/—/_ Building Dept.:, —/_ By:_
Fee deposited with Town Treasurer: —/—/_ By._ Waiver requested—
Hearing notice posted with Town Cle&,—/—/_ Mailed:JJ-
I&M�_/_
&_/_/_ Hearing(s) held on-.—J—/— Opened on
Conti nued to __/_J_ Withdrawn:_/_/— Decision Due BTJJ-
MadcJJ— Filed w /Town Clerk :JJ— MailedJJ-
2 Fairguo u ads Road Nantucket Massachusetts 02554
508 -228 -7215 telephone 508- 228 -7298 facsimile
State below or attach a separate addendum of specific special permits or variance relief applying for.
See Addendum, attached hereto as Exhibit W.
I certify that the information contained herein is substantially complete and true to the
best of my knowledge, under the pains and penalties of perjury.
SIGNATURE: Owner*
Joseph "oley and Harris I�j]]. n4ner
Richard Beaudette, Attorney for Joseph W. Foley and Harris K. Doliner
*If an Attorney or orb= Agent is representing the Owner or the Applicant, please provide a signed
proof of agency.
OFFICE USE ONLY
Application received on: —/—/_ By._ Complete:_ Need Copies:_
Filed with Town Cletk:—/—/_ Planning Board- /—/_ Building Dept:—/—/_ By:_
Fee deposited with Town Teeasuter: -/ -/_ By_ Waiver requested:_
Granted_/_/_ Hearing notice posted with Town Clerk.) -/ — Mailed :JJ-
I&MJJ— &_/_/_ Heating(s) held oaJJ— Opened on :JJ-
Contiaued to _/_/_ Withdrawn:_/—/_ Decision Due BT—/—/—
Made —J—/— Fried w /Town Clerk: —/—/_ Mailed: —/—/_
2 Fairgrounds Road Nantucket Massachusetts 02554
508- 228 -7215 telephone 508- 228 -7298 facsimile
ADDENDUM TO ZONING APPLICATION
8 Charter Street
The Applicants, Joseph W. Foley and Harris K. Doliner (hereinafter the "Applicants "),
are the owners of 8 Charter Street, Nantucket, Massachusetts 02554 (the "Property ").
Applicants hereby request Special Permit Relief pursuant to Section 139- 33.E(2)(a) as well as
Variance relief pursuant to Section 139 -32 of the Nantucket Zoning By -Law (the "By- Law").
The Property is located in the Residential Old Historic ("R -OH ") Zoning District and is currently
improved with a single family dwelling.
The existing conditions of the Property are shown on a Mortgage Inspection Plan
prepared by Emack Surveying, LLC, dated August 30, 2013 (the "Site Plan"), a copy of which is
attached as Exhibit A. As shown on the Site Plan, the Property consists of a 2,000 square foot lot
in a zoning district with a minimum required lot area of 5,000 square feet; has frontage in the
amount of 38.5' where 50' is required; a front yard setback of 0.2' where none is required; a 9'
easterly and a 3.3' westerly side yard setback where 5' is required, a rear yard setback of 12'
where 5' is required; and a ground cover ratio of 33% (660 square feet) in a district where 30%
(1,000 square feet) (30% is required for undersized lots) is the maximum ground cover ratio
allowed.
As such, the Property is non-conforming with respect to lot size, frontage, westerly side
yard setback, and ground cover. As evidenced by the Special Permit and Variance on record, a
copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit B, the existing dwelling on the Property was
constructed prior to 1972 and therefore, the Property is pre- existing nonconforming with respect
to the current zoning regulations in the R -OH Zoning District.
PROPOSED ALTERATIONS
As shown on the proposed plans prepared by Boticelli & Pohl Architects ("Proposed
Plan"), attached as Exhibit C the Applicants propose to add a 40 square foot two story addition
to the existing dwelling on the Property. As a result, the Applicants plan to extend the total
ground cover on the Property from 660 square feet to 700 square feet, creating a total ground
cover ratio of 35 %, well within the permitted ground cover ratio for the R -OH Zoning District of
50% with a Special Permit.
While the proposed addition simply extends the current westerly line of the dwelling 7.6'
further towards Charter Street, the proposed addition will create an additional five inch (5 ")
intrusion into the westerly side yard setback (3.3' to 2.10'). The reason for this minor intrusion
is that the shape of the lot on the west side is such that the Property line angles towards the house
so that any extension of the house on the same plane towards the street intrudes further into the
setback simply by virtue of the angled lot line. Also worth noting is that the topography of the
ADDENDUM TO ZONING APPLICATION
S Charter Street
The Applicants, Joseph W. Foley and Harris K. Doliner (hereinafter the "Applicants'j,
are the owners of 8 Charter Street, Nantucket, Massachusetts 02554 (the "Properly ").
Applicants hereby request Special Permit Relief pursuant to Section 139- 33.E(2)(a) as well as
Variance relief pursuant to Section 139 -32 of the Nantucket Zoning By -Law (the `By- Law").
The Property is located in the Residential Old Historic ( "R -OH'I Zoning District and is currently
improved with a single family dwelling.
The existing conditions of the Property are shown on a Mortgage Inspection Plan
prepared by Emack Surveying, LLC, dated August 30, 2013 (the "Site Plan"), a copy of which is
attached as Exhibit A. As shown on the Site Plan, the Property consists of a 2,000 square foot lot
in a zoning district with a minimum required lot area of 5,000 square feet; has frontage in the
amount of 38.5' where 50' is required; a front yard setback of 0.2' where none is required; a 9'
easterly and a 3.3' westerly side yard setback where 5' is required, a rear yard setback of 12'
where 5' is required; and a ground cover ratio of 33% (660 square feet) in a district where 30%
(1,000 square feet) (30% is required for undersized lots) is the maximum ground cover ratio
allowed.
As such, the Property is non - conforming with respect to lot size, frontage, westerly side
yard setback, and ground cover. As evidenced by the Special Permit and Variance on record, a
copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit B, the existing dwelling on the Property was
constructed prior to 1972 and therefore, the Property is pre- existing non - conforming with respect
to the current zoning regulations in the R -OH Zoning District.
PROPOSED ALTERATIONS
As shown on the proposed plans prepared by Boticelli & Pohl Architects ( "Proposed
Plan'), attached as Exhibit C, the Applicants propose to add a 40 square foot two story addition
to the existing dwelling on the Property. As a result, the Applicants plan to extend the total
ground cover on the Property from 660 square feet to 700 square feet, creating a total ground
cover ratio of 35 %, well within the permitted ground cover ratio for the R -OH Zoning District of
50% with a Special Permit.
While the proposed addition simply extends the current westerly line of the dwelling 7.6'
further towards Charter Street, the proposed addition will create an additional five inch (5 ")
intrusion into the westerly side yard setback (3.3' to 2.10'). The reason for this minor intrusion
is that the shape of the lot on the west side is such that the Property line angles towards the house
so that any extension of the house on the same plane towards the street intrudes further into the
setback simply by virtue of the angled lot line. Also worth noting is that the topography of the
lot is such that the lot slopes downward in the back of the lot, making it more difficult and
expensive to build in that area of the Property.
Under Section 139- 33E(2)(a) of the By -Law:
For a lot within the provisions of this Section 139 -E, the maximum ground cover upon
such lot shall be:
(a) In the case of a lot containing less than 5,000 square feet, 30% of the area of the
lot; provided, however, that the special permit granting authority may grant a special
permit to allow ground cover not to exceed the permitted ground cover ratio in the zoning
district where such lot is situated. Said special permit shall require a finding that such
increase in permitted ground cover shall not be substantially more detrimental to the
neighborhood than the existing nonconformity.
While the Applicants plan to extend the ground cover on the Property from 33% to 35 %,
the proposed new ground cover does not exceed the 50% ground cover ratio permitted in the R-
OH zoning district. Further, the proposed addition is modest in size. Therefore, the proposed
work will not be substantially more detrimental to the neighborhood than the existing
nonconforming structure on the Property.
Additionally, the mere five inch intrusion into the westerly side yard setback as a result of
the proposed work is due to the angle of the westerly lot line and is de- minimis. As such, the
shape and topography of the lot is such that a literal enforcement of the Zoning By -Law would
create a substantial hardship to the Applicants, financial or otherwise.
CONCLUSION
Granting the proposed Special Permit under the above referenced Sections of the By -Law
for the new addition will not be substantially more detrimental to the neighborhood than the pre-
existing non - conforming structure on the Property. The proposed addition is suitable for the
Property and will be in harmony with other houses in this area of the Island. Also, by granting
the requested Special Permit, the Board would be acting in a manner consistent with the spirit
and intent of the Zoning By -Law.
Finally, due to the shape and topography of the lot and the dwelling thereon, the literal
enforcement of the current R -OH zoning regulations would create a substantial hardship for the
Applicant. Granting this relief does not involve substantial detriment to the public good or a
derogation of the intent of the By -law.
The Applicant respectfully requests that the Board grant the requested relief.
lot is such that the lot slopes downward in the back of the lot, making it more difficult and
expensive to build in that area of the Property.
Under Section 139- 33E(2)(a) of the By -Law:
For a lot within the provisions of this Section 139 -E, the maximum ground cover upon
such lot shall be:
(a) In the case of a lot containing less than 5,000 square feet, 30% of the area of the
lot; provided, however, that the special permit granting authority may grant a special
permit to allow ground cover not to exceed the permitted ground cover ratio in the zoning
district where such lot is situated. Said special permit shall require a finding that such
increase in permitted ground cover shall not be substantially more detrimental to the
neighborhood than the existing nonconformity.
While the Applicants plan to extend the ground cover on the Property from 33% to 35 %,
the proposed new ground cover does not exceed the 50% ground cover ratio permitted in the R-
OH zoning district. Further, the proposed addition is modest in size. Therefore, the proposed
work will not be substantially more detrimental to the neighborhood than the existing
nonconforming structure on the Property.
Additionally, the mere five inch intrusion into the westerly side yard setback as a result of
the proposed work is due to the angle of the westerly lot line and is de- minimis. As such, the
shape and topography of the lot is such that a literal enforcement of the Zoning By -Law would
create a substantial hardship to the Applicants, financial or otherwise.
CONCLUSION
Granting the proposed Special Permit under the above referenced Sections of the By -Law
for the new addition will not be substantially more detrimental to the neighborhood than the pre-
existing non - conforming structure on the Property. The proposed addition is suitable for the
Property and will be in harmony with other houses in this area of the Island. Also, by granting
the requested Special Permit, the Board would be acting in a manner consistent with the spirit
and intent of the Zoning By -Law.
Finally, due to the shape and topography of the lot and the dwelling thereon, the literal
enforcement of the current R -OH zoning regulations would create a substantial hardship for the
Applicant. Granting this relief does not involve substantial detriment to the public good or a
derogation of the intent of the By -law.
The Applicant respectfully requests that the Board grant the requested relief.
Town and County of Nantucket November 7, 2013
zw
2130
1
`,62.& 120 'x23.263 m r
62.3!2^25 � 4 2
. 2126: .\ `
6323
121111 3 d
d 321 131
6 12]
I 0 126
• x232122 a 16
is
62.3.2180
6
�i 1 1st
` az3zl I
223.2 Men - p
12195 /-
x
/212
At 1B
1 I
J 1 V - z163 6
1n2 \
3s -.'32 Tt2117.1
1.
1 A; azi 232
a S. 42.a 21
z
3 32
11 d \ ,
.�"
-� at 161
-r IYJ.2 H3
Properly Information
Property ID 0232165
Location 8CHARTER ST
Owner SOMOROFF MICHAEL S AJJJA I b.
i
MAP FOR REFERENCE ONLY
NOT A LEGAL DOCUMENT,\
The Town makes no claims and no wamentles,
as passed or implied mncernln8 the vd sd in
ccorad, of the GIS data presented on fps map.
Parcels updated December, 2012
NOTE: NO PLAN FOR LOCUS WAS FOUND. THIS
CHARTER STREET RECORD AS SHOWN HE HEREON. ABUTTING PLANS PLAN
P
SHOULD NOT BE USED TO ESTABLISH LOT LINE
I N atone step 36.5'
+ —I
7 /
LOT AREA:
2,000 ± SF
jw/deck nclosure I +
on grade
41.6'
ADDITIONAL NOTES: 1.) LOT DOES NOT MEET CURRENT
ZONING REQUIREMENTS WITH RESPECT TO MINIMUM LOT
42.3.2 -164 p, pFUND SIZE AND `NTH RESPECT TO MINIMUM FRONTAGE.
N/F GERARLD R k REBECCA n`1N 0_t`gq� 2.) DWELLING DOES NOT CONFORM TO CURRENT ZONING
ROBERT ey REQUIREMENTS WITH RESPECT TO SIDE YARD SETBACK
s A AND WITH RESPECT TO ALLOWABLE GROUND COVER..
CURRENT ZONING: ROH 3 EMACK 5 3.) STONE STEP IS OVER STREET LINE.
No
MINIMUM LOT SIZE: 5,000 SF }dy, F
V730 P
MINIMUM FRONTAGE: 50 FT a pC E
FRONTYARD SETBACK: 0 FT 41 Apo L
SIDE AND REAR SETBACK: 5 FTC
ALLOWABLE G.C.R.: 50% (30% FOR LOT < 5000 SF)
EXISTING G.C.R.: 33% ±
FOR PROPERTY LINE DETERMINATION THIS PLOT PLAN
RELIES ON CURRENT DEEDS AND PLANS OF RECORD,
VERIFIED BY FIELD MEASUREMENTS AS SHOWN HEREON.
THIS PLAN IS NOT REPRESENTED TO BE A ORE
EXAMINATION OR A RECORDABLE SURVEY.
I HEREBY CERTIFY TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE
THAT THE PREMISES SHOWN ON THIS PLAN ARE
LOCATED WITHIN THE C ZONE AS DELINEATED
ON THE "FIRM" MAP OF COMMUNITY NO. 250230;
MASS. EFFECTIVE: 6 -3 -86, REVISED 7 -2 -92 BY
THE FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY.
MORTGAGE INSPECTION PLAN
IN
NANTUCKET, MASSACHUSETTS
SCALE: 1 " =10' DATE:AUG. 30, 2013
DEED REFERENCE:DBK 897, PG 216
PLAN REFERENCE: NONE FOR LOCUS
ASSESSOR'S REFERENCE:
MAP: 42.3.2 PARCEL: 165
PREPARED FOR: JOSEPH W. FOLEY
and HARRIS K. DOLINER
EMACK SURVEYING, LLC
2 WASHAMAN AVENUE
NANTUCKET, MA. 02554
(508) 325 - 0940(508) 325 -0940 J_t206
A T
+
1 1/2 sty
3.3'—
w/f dwelling
v
m
ao g w
m
ao =m
F
Np
N O
d
d
deck
a
9 ± n///
LOT AREA:
2,000 ± SF
jw/deck nclosure I +
on grade
41.6'
ADDITIONAL NOTES: 1.) LOT DOES NOT MEET CURRENT
ZONING REQUIREMENTS WITH RESPECT TO MINIMUM LOT
42.3.2 -164 p, pFUND SIZE AND `NTH RESPECT TO MINIMUM FRONTAGE.
N/F GERARLD R k REBECCA n`1N 0_t`gq� 2.) DWELLING DOES NOT CONFORM TO CURRENT ZONING
ROBERT ey REQUIREMENTS WITH RESPECT TO SIDE YARD SETBACK
s A AND WITH RESPECT TO ALLOWABLE GROUND COVER..
CURRENT ZONING: ROH 3 EMACK 5 3.) STONE STEP IS OVER STREET LINE.
No
MINIMUM LOT SIZE: 5,000 SF }dy, F
V730 P
MINIMUM FRONTAGE: 50 FT a pC E
FRONTYARD SETBACK: 0 FT 41 Apo L
SIDE AND REAR SETBACK: 5 FTC
ALLOWABLE G.C.R.: 50% (30% FOR LOT < 5000 SF)
EXISTING G.C.R.: 33% ±
FOR PROPERTY LINE DETERMINATION THIS PLOT PLAN
RELIES ON CURRENT DEEDS AND PLANS OF RECORD,
VERIFIED BY FIELD MEASUREMENTS AS SHOWN HEREON.
THIS PLAN IS NOT REPRESENTED TO BE A ORE
EXAMINATION OR A RECORDABLE SURVEY.
I HEREBY CERTIFY TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE
THAT THE PREMISES SHOWN ON THIS PLAN ARE
LOCATED WITHIN THE C ZONE AS DELINEATED
ON THE "FIRM" MAP OF COMMUNITY NO. 250230;
MASS. EFFECTIVE: 6 -3 -86, REVISED 7 -2 -92 BY
THE FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY.
MORTGAGE INSPECTION PLAN
IN
NANTUCKET, MASSACHUSETTS
SCALE: 1 " =10' DATE:AUG. 30, 2013
DEED REFERENCE:DBK 897, PG 216
PLAN REFERENCE: NONE FOR LOCUS
ASSESSOR'S REFERENCE:
MAP: 42.3.2 PARCEL: 165
PREPARED FOR: JOSEPH W. FOLEY
and HARRIS K. DOLINER
EMACK SURVEYING, LLC
2 WASHAMAN AVENUE
NANTUCKET, MA. 02554
(508) 325 - 0940(508) 325 -0940 J_t206
L-4k-4(t" k
NOTE: NO PLAN FOR LOCUS WAS FOL
CHARTER STREET RECORD AS SHOWN ON THISPPLI
o SHOULD NOT BE USED TO ESTABUSH
L tl atone stsP 38.5'
+
a
a a
g A� T z
+ \1 1/2 sty +�
3.3'- w/f dwelling
0 ow
ON
� O
J b W N =m
me a �F
a
wx q O
K
deck
LOT AREA:
± 2,000 ± SF I^
shower enclosure I+
w/ deck on grade +
42.3.2 -184
H/F QERARLD R, & REBECCA P.
eF A.
CURRENT ZONING: ROH EMACIC
MINIMUM LOT SIZE: 5,000 SIF
MINIMUM FRONTAGE: 50 FT '�' 'r215iERE0`�,t
FRONTYARD SETBACK: 0 FT
SIDE AND REAR SETBACK: 5 FTC
ALLOWABLE G.C.R.: 50% (30% FOR LOT < 5
EXISTING G.C.R.: 33% ±
FOR PROPERTY LINE DETERMINATION THIS PLOT PLAN
RELIES ON CURRENT DEEDS AND PLANS OF RECORD,
VERIFIED BY FIELD MEASUREMENTS AS SHOWN HEREON.
THIS PLAN IS NOT REPRESENTED TO BE A TITLE
EXAMINATION OR A RECORDABLE SURVEY.
I HEREBY CERTIFY TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE
THAT THE PREMISES SHOWN ON THIS PLAN ARE
LOCATED WITHIN THE C ZONE AS DELINEATED
ON THE "FIRM' MAP OF COMMUNITY NO. 250230;
MASS. EFFECTIVE: 6 -3 -88, REVISED 7 -2 -92 BY
THE FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY.
ADDITIONAL NOTES: 1.) LOT DOES NOT MEET CURRENT
ZONING REQUIREMENTS WITH RESPECT TO MINIMUM LOT
SIZE AND WITH RESPECT TO MINIMUM FRONTAGE,
2.) DWELLING DOES NOT CONFORM TO CURRENT ZONING
REQUIREMENTS WITH RESPECT TO SIDE YARD SETBACK
AND 1WTH RESPECT TO ALLOWABLE GROUND COVER..
3.) STONE STEP IS OVER STREET LINE,
MORTGAGE INSPECTION PLAN
L
IN
NANTUCKET, MASSACHUSETTS
000 SF)
SCALE: 1 " =10' DATE:AUG. 30, 2013
DEED REFERENCE: DBK 897, PG 216
PLAN REFERENCE: NONE FOR LOCUST
ASSESSOR'S REFERENCE:
MAP: 42.3.2 PARCEL: 165
PREPARED FOR: JOSEPH W. FOLEY
and HARRIS K. DOLINER
EMACK SURVEYING, LLC
2 WASHAMAN AVENUE
NANTUCKET, MA. 02554
(508) 325 -0940 J -1206
����� C5
pug Us eta 40
T}(H COMgOIjWP,ALTH OF MAgSAGiHV$HifB
BOARD OF Are"
))eta Natob 21 .., Ip 45
Cetflt{ dofo otl1 or adanceor al a t
Oaa w. cTs ="0 ono 11
Tba Bawd orappnls otthe(5ty or Town of Nantucket t���
hereby anlrics that a Vanance� isio VmWd
TO Use# HYYea SS-p1 617 -85)
Address 7 Yalr SC hee
agwTown Nentucket ^� �
pffedfns Is rights of the owner with rgpat to land or 6Wldings at j Ostrow stpdot
--- .- ....T_
And the said Hoprd of Appeal funha eertl(IM that the dec{tlIooqq 4raehddhligo 6 a Wpaod
WneWt ropy of Its decisloh sranthog said Oadanep — apeehF +paiah, toil (hat poptes of dald
decision, and or air plshs afeI Itl In the it 1'01141100 have been filed with the pl"Ins bore and
thedryortown Berk,
T'ht Word of Appeals also calls to the atlentian It the awn, or applldani tqt Demand Laws,
Chapter eoA, Section I l But paragraph) provides that no variances oryevl.lpam{t, or my a-
Instep, modincenon or renewal t11610f, shall take prim until a copy of the des slon badngthe
anlncaston of the town or city clerk that twenty days have elapsed after the dddon has been
flied in the office of the city or town clerk and n' appeal has been filed or that, if such appal has
been filed, that It has been dismissed or d{nk+J, is raorded In the registry of deeds for the county
and district In which the land Is locoed and Indexed In the grantor Index under the name of the
owner of rmord or Is r,,ordeQ and noted on the owner's cminm, of title. The fee for such noM,
ding or reglsteringshall beptslil by the owner or applies nt.
ng iw,.x i. T r
.act u.. Nom car...............
} 4
t r
•'!F).
it
, "'
.�.:y a,4..
ir19 ?fir. ::
,
T g ,' :
A
Ra Wily
T}IB COM4ONWBALTH OF Kk%AdHO8BTT8
p e k t
i ave<r—
BOARD OF AFF"
Deter latch •21 ,iq 05
Cett�({I rteotO ntl Ch V�iaT 11 PaWt.
(Omer we CTSD tt/OA, Qonll
Tha 9oardotsppealsofthcClayor Town of Nantucket
hereby ttrtifietthat a Vadaoce�s grgn�d
To Clara Nurra 81a 1 617 -m
Agdrn/ 37 Pair St rat
Clrym Talvn Nantucket
affecting We rights of the owner with respect to land or bWlding tat. 9 �et•�.sr 8trieOX
II
And the Wit 1loprd of Appeals further certifies six, the dec{aluq slashed heEso h a true and
extract copy of Its decision granting said hulsnce _ aptctaFSe,iut, and that copies of Wit
decision• and of at plan! refeMai «1 in the decWdo, have been fled with the plahfdng boars and
the city or town clerk,
The Baird of appals ale, calls to the attention of the owner or app's root, that Oeneru Laws,
Chapter 40A, Secretors I l tiara paragraph) provldes that no variance arapauJ.parath, or any ex-
hearten, modification or renewal thereof. $hW take Affect until a copy of the d don hating the
cenificatiats of the town or city clerk that twangy days have elapsed after the d�c slon has been
filed in theoffi" of tfie city or town clerk and no appeal has been filed or that, If inch appeal has
been filed, that It has been dismissed or denied, is recorded In the registry of deeds for the county
and district In which the land is twilled and Indexed In the grantor Index under the name of the
owner of record or is recorded and noted on the owner's ttnlficete of title. The fee for ouch recu,
ding or tightening shirt beprl�l by the owner a,applica4,;
i
..aa,... pn.a.. w....r.,ae..a,,.. I
r >
<•.tir :'b : .. }.. fits...' a +5° "e�' ai •''48r'g� -'d„ r'J..
' if:':r.�r % 4'...he7 .M.`)'�t ..' +'. ". r_. C• ty, .n,... .f'' •! �`'
Lc1.F x%~ee xx7<
•g�tp r,
Y :N2 r31 rv£t, <Iz ..
I /�.l
f�
i m 228 'rut U '
i
TOWN OP NANTUCEET i
BOARD OP APPEALS
4MMCMET, MASSACHUSETTS 0255;
DECISION.
At A. Public Hearing of the SOARD OP APPEALS held et 1130 •?
° M._en_Nednseday,,Maroh 13, 1986 in the.Town and County Buildi_
.gcMantuoket, In 'the matter of the Application of Clara Murtay
=.4
'• '" ' Slepin 1017 -85), the -Board £lode. ' ' -
1. This is an Application for a Variance pursuant to
Sebtion 7H granting relief from Section 5, l iIntenalty Regulations=
Minimum Lot Size) of the Zoning ey -Lew. The Applicant seek.
a variance to cure the technical defect as to marketability with .I
respect to preniees owned by her end situote at No. a Charter — "-
Street.
2. Said promisee (shown as Lot 165 on Assessor'. Map No.
#2.3.2) consists of A lot containing approximately 2,178 square
fast, with A dwelling house located thereon since of least 1925:
eituete in the Residential Old Historic Eon. in which the Minimum
Lot Size Ss 5,000 square feet. ,
3. The Applicant purchased the premises on January 30,
1984 in the belly that it conetitutod a prp- existing non-
conforming parcel and thus was exempt from said Minimum Lot Sire
requirement.
4. The Applicant subsequently discovered that, subsequent
to the adoption of the Zoning Sy -Law in 1972, the premises had
bean held in -OM. ownership with adjoining land fronting on
Hillera Lane (Lot 2, Plan Book 19, Page 1331 Aseaesor•a Map No.
42.3.2, Lot 164) by one Alice M. Collins, a predecessor in title.
Said adjoining land, also of leas than minimum lot size, had
been conveyed to a third party Subaequsnt to the adoption of
the By -Law. The dwelling house situated thereon was constructed
more than six years ago.
5. The resulting technical violation of the Zoning By-
Law arguablyy affects the marketability of the premises, has
caused the la" of A pia thereof end creates An extreme hardship
to the Applicant.
6, The ales and shape of the premises and its location
in A densely developed area leaves the Applicant with no appertunity
to acquire adjacent land to 0 tiefy the Minieue Let Site requlra-
rnt..
I
,_... _..___ •"~)'_'.�-^•^ +�_
.ear,....,....._
0
:f
)
:1TAWEr.
. ... .; ...
1111
••
�`a�i;''
�
%:.,iii
i MO. 228 'MA 41 '
Town OF NANTUCKET f
BOARD OF APPEALS
NANTUCKET, MASSACHUSETTS 01594
DECISION,
! )
At e.PUbliO Hearing of the BOARD OF APPEALS held at 1,30
M._on_Nadnesday,.Heroh 13, 198¢ in ahe,TCwn and teunty Building__ 'I
_ __ Nantucket, in the matter of the Application of Clara Hurray
'- Blepin (017 -85), the Board find.,
-' 1. This Ss an Application for a variance pursuant to
SeDlSOn 7H granting relief from section 5,4 (Intensity ReguletiOns -:
Minimum Lot Sim) of the Zoning Sy -Law. The Applicant teak. -
e variance to cure the technical defect as to marketability with
respect t0 premises owned by her end situate at No. B Charter
Street.
1. Said premise. ).how. as Lot 155 on A.seeaox'e Hap No.
41.3.1) cone fate of a lot containing approximately 3,178 square
• feat, with a dwelling how.. located thereon -Inca at least 1915;
situate in the Residential Old Historic Bone in which the Minimum
Let Size is 5,000 squard feet. ,
3. The Applicant purchased the premises on January 30,
1904 in the belief that it uonstitut9d a prp- existing non-
conforming parcel and thus was exempt from laid MinimuM Lot Site -
requirement.
d. The Applicant subsequently discovered that, subsequent
to the adoption of the Zoning Sy -Law in 1971, the premises had
been held in COMM. ownership with adjoining land fronting on
Millers Lane )Let 1, Plan Book 19, Page 133, Aegee-Or'a Hap No.
4 ?•3.1, Lot 164) by one Alice H. Collins, a predecessor in title,
Said adjoining land, also of leas than minimum lot alas, had
been conveyed to a third party aubesqusnt to the adoption of
the ey -Law. The dwelling house situated thereon vas constructed
more than six years ago.
S. The resulting violation the ise., by-
Law arguably a MCX0el
he
the premises, - hea
affect* the mhereof
caused the loss and re
seated the loss Of a tale thargof end Oeeakaa as extreae hudebip
4o the Applicant.
f
6. The else and shape Of the premises and its location
In a densely dtveloped area leaves the Apylieant with ne o=rtenity
to acquire adjacent land
to satisfy the Minimum Lot sit require•
manta.
n
to '40 Mat ix
i
A teviw el the Appllaltian, t due, to
7, taaed &pod the ware flnde lMt 6w to
Qoowntatlon, end Ng to tY, aMya and location of the I
oirawtaneoe :eldkkSn9 to ! aiw. and -- peciall affecting .
-__ __- -w .irrotor. !hereon, _,,,, M e„- ao dieltSOi .._....._-
J. which it stt a be granted without
-- of the SY-"w vcald relief May na
the Applicant• a r.9uP aad -w thout ulll, {y_ig��,�,
r_auD4CantiaL •e• "• ^h [O eha_9pm the inter f-_ - o[.t�i-' �=:
-tor substantially dexoget�ng from the intent or guspo
By�Law.
B'tbc A plicantwee eet(jV. haigin5 the ethe Zoning _ 1
aRANrb Cha ApPlScenyuantrelief
to aECTiON R bYSWanLaaue vote.
9Y
few by VARIANCE PVx ..
patadl nGUpkpt e' RA802554
Y✓.M�f�il ,li4te` f
C. tit it-O ti b., M xqw J. Y, �x•
II+�ii .:wA
1
COUNTY '�,
!�•i-
NANTUCKET
Received and Entered
"a
APR 12 1985 9:2aAn
i1_,*:
Atteej anafi C .
ji
Repleler �!
el � •.
•s
Gf �. T'�> f, __mat c
i + ', T-'i4' f i t 'e ( .
�' 6: 1 �; �.1- r
.;.'t � r �,ijt. ' 4 ry;
�'Y*. _I.i�,., ri
`*'
, ,� • . .
,.. ,..
i rr ,
y i 4%el {e �rlK Spplatl v;
�1Ya
It +} rd�•
{
V -
1
a .vi" o! tM APplb•t ' five
rice! =ntaetirAt tho 8o+ta !!Ma tMe dw eo
doou ntt roe_i �nN to the 011.0, nMw•P!o location of eq I
lall •LLeatinq
thKaon. _ __'�... ds.eriot -
-'
In whion it s. a - - - I�w.tMtiel rsne= = +e• - -
-' of the ey-LY Yowl: xi.qupelep xe11.L may be granted without S
the APP ST 9ggy_end xitha4RJLl�� r
as,sr._aobhtantl+L � at- CP- f= o^Wblia.' - 0101
or .ob•tmtt•Lly darogdi�n9 from the intent o: Eorgoee of.+
ayLaw. 0101.
8.-Por the- reawne get forth hpr4S
n, the Onard- hereby
"w by by YARSANC81Pwteuantlto VSCTIONC77'B0by - OnSmoue voting 8Y
b•cedr march dl , 1985
Nantupkpt, NA 02554
-WTI x�
L .1.i ?t � I
4.O P.tw. rgW J. Y. .7r.
I I _n.1 � :0101.. 1.i., war•"
NANTUCKET COUNTY )
Received and Entered
APR 12 1985 1
Atteaj
W.
0e71eler u 'M,
i.
f
sir
0101 �
�ts�=• +'— — �,t -- - r.. s.,.:t; '`'. � `0101 •
•a'? .i,. '.,�:e` 0101
16 7CrF�.4
.�....,...'.y.�,Y.l�:.n�., •. r:.., �:.- . 01,01 0101 •. 0101
RICK MSPm23J
TOWN OF NANTUCKIEr
AA, �
ass'
BOARD OF APPEALS
+roraTte` NANTUCKET. MASSACHUSETTS 02554 .
Date, December /1 20 00
Tor Parties in Internet and. Others concerned with the -
Decision of the BOARD OF APPEALS in rho Application Of the
tol3ovio9,
Application No., 093 -00
Owner /Applicant, BRADLEY J. ESTY AND GUNNEL K. NEW,
FOR THEMSELVES AS OWNRRS, AND FOR EIGHT CHARTER MEET,
LLC, KIM ■ONDEAD, MANAGER, CONTRACT PURCHASER -
Enclosed in the Decision of the BOARD OF APPEALS which ham
this day been filed In the office of the Nantucket To"
Clerk.
An Appeal true this Decision may be taken pursuant to
Section 17 of Chapter 40A, Massachusetts General Lava.
Any action appealing the Decision must be brought by
filing an complaint In court Within TWENTY (20) days altar
this day's date. Notice of the action with a copy of the -
complaint and certified copy of she Decision ..at be given
to the Town Clerk so ad to ON received Within such MUTT
(20) days. .
Michael J. O'Mara, Ch roan
cez Town Clerk
Planning Board
Dullding Commissioner
PLEASE NOTE. MOST SPECIAL PERMITS AND VARIANCES HAVE A TIME
LIMIT AND NI LL EXPIRE IP NOT ACTED UPON ACCORDING TO NANTUCKET
ZONING BY -LAN 0139 -301 (SPECIAL PERMITS), 9139 -321 (VARIANCES) ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE CALL THE NANTUCKET. ZONING. BOARD OF APPEALS.
:oacQb(ii °ilir�
TOWN OF NANTUCKET
c BOARD OF APPEALS
+roaaae• NANTUCKET. MASSACHUSETTS 02554 .
Date; December /1 20 00
To, Pu C1ea !n InteceaC sad. Others concerned with LM -
Doclai0n o! a BOARD OF APPEALS in the Application of the
'...'a"
Application NO, 093 -00
Owner /Applicant, BRADLEY J. CITY AND GUNNEL N. ESTY,
FOR THEMSELVES AS OWNERS, AND FOR BIGHT CHARTER STREET.
LLC, KIM RONDEAO, MANAGER, CONTRACT PURCHASER
Enclosed Is the Decision Of the BOARD OF APPEALS which has
this day been filed In the office of the Nantucket Town
Clerk.
An Appeal from this Danielon may be taken pursuant to
Section 17 of chapter 40A, Wesachueette General Laws.
Any action appealing the Decision moat be brought by
filing an complaint in court within TWENTY (20) days alter
this day's date. Notice Of the action with a copy of the
Complaint and certified copy of the Decision must De given
to the Town Clerk so as to be received within sue TWENTY
(20) days. -
Michael J. O'Mara, Ch roan ( -
Cc, Town Clerk _
Planning Hoard
Ouildin9 Commissioner
PLEASE NOTE, MOST SPECIAL PERMITS AND VARIANCSS NAVE A TIME
LIMIT AND WILL EXPIRE IF NOT ACTED UPON ACCORDING'TO HAMTUOKET
ZONING BY -LAN 1139 -30I (SPECIAL PERMITS); 1139 -32I (VARIANCES)
ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE CALL THE NANTUCKET.=MING BOARD OF APPEALS.
.
300806lraal20
4tl�TUG'Fl
or
eggaoNANTUCKET,
- TOWN OF NAMTOCKEr
ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
37 WASTUNGTON STREET
MASSACHUSETTS 02554
PHONE508- 238-815
FAX 50&228 -805
Assessor's Map 42.3.2 8 Chanel Street
Parcel 165 oad Ref. 593276
RON
M a Public Hearing oftbe Nan salon Zoning Board of Appealnccld at 12:00
P.M., Friday. November 17,200D, in the Conference Room, Town Annex Building, 37
Washington Stmat, Nantucket, Mom mehmem, on the Application of BRADLEY 3. ESTY
AND GUNNEL K FSTY, FOR THEMSELVES AS OWNERS, do William F. Hunts,
P.O. Box 659, Nantucket MA 02554, and for EIGHT CHARTER STREET LLC, KIM
K RONDEAU, MANAGER, CONTRACT PURCHASER, do losepb M. Guay, P.O.
Box 1294, Nantucket, MA 02554, Board of Appeals File No. 093 -00, the Bound made the
following Decision:
1. Appliant(Ronisco)4 seeking reliefby SPECIAL PERMIT under Nantucket
Zoning Bylaw Sermon 139 -33A (a ocationrexpwion ofa pre<ais6ng mucces fa mina
structure/ use). Applicant proposes to expand the ear portion of the singlo-family
dwelling by raising the single -story ponion W 1 12 stories over the existing footprint.
There would be on ine .of the gmund coves ratio or fuMcr invasion into the utback
somas. The Locus is nonconforming as m lot size with the Lot containing about 2 .004
poem fact of arcs in a district that mquira a minimum let size of 5,000 Nnua fact; as
to ground cover ntio with the Lot containing about 33% in a district that «yuium a
maximum ground cover ratio of 30% Without relief; as to 6onwgc with the Lot having
about 36.68 fact along Chaser Street in a disuid that requires a minimum frontage of 50
fat; and as to side yard setback with the structure being sited at about 3.33 feet at its -
elow, point from the westerly side yard lot line in a district that squires a minimum side
yard setback of five (5) fact
The Premises is located d 8 CHARTER STREET, Aasasor's Map 42.3.2, Parcel
165, Deed Ref. 592/276. The progeny is mned Residentiol- Old- Hisodc.
2. The Decision is based upon the Application and materials submitted with it acrd
the testimony aM evidence ptesemed at the haring. The Plmming Bomd made no
snecrow dadon as the mmtd coos not ofpbmdng eoncam. There come an letters on file
and no opposition Presented at the hearing
adg6�ifaHPr�iO
TOWN OF NAMWICU[
aopxJgcy6r
g2 ZOMNG BOARD OF APPEALS
6e, 37 WASHINGTON STREET
nrbfle�o. NANTUCKET, MASSACHUSETTS 02554
PHONE 508. 228 -7215
FAX 508 - 228.7205
Assessor's MeP 423.2 a Charter Street
Pawl 165 Dad Ref. 592/276
R014
M a Public Hearing of the Nentootct Zoning Board of Appalsbeld U 12:00
P.M., Friday, November 17, 2000, in the Conference Rx*n Town Anna Bwld'usg, 37
Wasidngtov Sheet, Naotake, Massachusetts, on the Application of BRADLEY J. PEN
AND GUNNEL K. ESTY. FORTHEMSELVES AS OWNER$ do Wigimo F. Huntw,
P.O. Box 659, Nantucket, MA 02554, anti for EIGHT CHARTER STREET LLC, KIM
X. RONDEAU. MANAGER, CONTRACT PURCHASER, do Josepb M. Guay, P.O.
Box 1294, Nantucket, MA 02554, Board of Appeals File No. 093 -00, the Board made the
fallowing Decision:
1. Applienot(ReMau) R sealing relief by SPECIAL PERMIT order Neamcket
Zoning Bylaw Section 139- 33A(altenGontapandon of pre- tting nownerfmming
strucnuduec). Applicant proposes to expand the mar portion of the single - family
dwel ing by raising the single -story Portion to 1 in tactics ova the existing footprint
Them would be no increase of we gmaw cover ratio a further intrusion into the sctbads
arms. The now is conwnforming as to lot size with the Lot containing about 2 ,004
square Can of area in a district that requires a minimum lot 'I= of 5,000 square fact; as
.. m ground cover ratio with the Lot containing about 33% in a district met t requhna
maximhm ground cover ratio of 30 want relief. In
with the Lot having
about 36.68 far along Chana Strew in a district that rtquim a ndNmom Gonmgc of 50
feet; and as to side yard setback with the sbwxwe being sited at about 3.33 feet at Its
eleaat point from the watedy side yard lot line in a district that requires 0 minimum aide
yard setback of five (5) fat
The Prm isa is located w 6 CHARTER STREET, Assessor's Map 42.3.2, Parcel
165, Deed Ref 5921276. The pmpnny is vaned Residential- Old - Historic.
2. The Derision u based upro the Appticauon" material. submitted with it mW
the madmen, and avidwa Prmentod at the hcoring. The Planning Board made a,
rsommwdwion u the matter tom not ofplvming concern. There, were no letters on file
and no opposition presented w the hewing
1;nr06HL'eisAl
3. Applicant, through counsel, represented that the existing structure pre-dined the
1972 edactment of the Zoning Bylaw, and was thus validly gardfathmCd. Applicant
proposes, so part ofa renovation project, to add a second -rtory dement over an existing
single-smry rear portion ofthe single- family dwelling to expand interior living space and
add a bedroom and bath. The rear addition presently exists within the nut -ird fivo-fwt
side yard setback ar a. being sired at show 3.33 feet at its closest point and about 3.89
feet at its farthest point from the westerly lot line. The alteration would be in line with the
existing footprint, expanding in an upward direction from a roof ridge height of about
12.8 feet to about 20.3 rect, and would act inomer, the nonconforming setback nor would
it inmeue the nonconforming ground cover min Applicant fuller represents Nat the
damtion and expansion proposd is minor in nature and the enlargerncot would not
change the msummal use ofthe property or dnereasethe perking rrywrcuumt, with one
(I) space required and provided on sit -.
4. Theref ore, the Board finds that the Phonation and exparion as proposed, taising
the height ofthe one -sorry, rear addition from about 12.8 feet to about 20.3 feet, with the
main house having a roof ridge height ofabout 21.6 feet, without coming any closer Us -
the westerly side yard lot line than the existing addition and without inown,ing the
ground cover ratio, would be an increase in the massing of the stnmtune within the
mquird five -foot side yard setback discamm However, said inereasse, would not be
substantially mom detrimental to the neighborhood Nan the existing nonconforming
structure ad the addition would have little impact upon the ocighborlmod.
5. Accordingly. by avote of four (4)in favor (Parent, Hounhar, Toole, Murphy) ad .
one (1) opt, .d (Sevrem), Ne Board GEAKM ih,,egueamd SPECIAL PE8 ff tdief
udn Nentuckn Zoning Bylaw Section 139-33A m allow the alteration and eapamioa u
proposed, adding a second story b the exiting rear dnglo-story portion ofthe singh,
family dwelling over the existing footprint, without coming arty closer to the westerly -
side yard lot line and without increasing the ground cover ratio, upon the following
condidora: -
e. The bearing walls ofthe existingsin8le- rtory addition shall remain 1
aubsunually intact, and those portions of the addition within the westerly, frvo- foot 1
required side yard setback aura shag not be «moved; sod !
It. The addition shall le coruuucud m sulcusetid confonnanw with the _ 1
Ceruficen, ofAppropriments, No. 36, 886, as may be amended as Approved by the .
Nantucket Historic District Commiadon,
Dined; Dsembe//,2000
e
t
William P. Homihnm, Jr. '
- NK0681'ae24.1
3. Applicant, through couael, represented that the existing structure pre dated the
1972 enac urcut of the Tuning Bylaw and was thus validly gmndfathved. Applicant
propose; as pan alto renovation project, to add a second -atmy clement over an existing
single -nary ram portion of the single - family dwelling x expand interior living spent and -
add a bedroom and bath. The rear addition presently exists within the required five -lout
s[dg yard setback area, being sited at about 3.33 feet at its clams, point and about 3.89
fat at itsf aMat point from the westerly lot line. The altuaton would be in line with the -
existinglomprin4 expanding in an upward direction from a roof ridge height of about
12.8f Ix about 20.3fcc4 and would not immune the rmnconforsom, setback nor would
it humane, the, nenterformin6 grouts cover ratio. Applicant fuMa represents that 'be
alteration and expansion proposed is miner in mount and the enlargement would not
change the residential use oftht property am mar rout the parking requirement, with rare
(1) spent required and provided on site.
4. Therefore, the Board finds that the alteration and expamion as proposed, raising
the height ofthe one -story rear addition from about 12.8 feat to about 20.3 fat, with the
main house having a roof ridge height of about 21.6 feet, without naming my doscr as
the westeriy side yard lot line lam the existing addition and without inemossing Ore
ground cover ratio, would be an increase in the massing of the stmctum within the -
ox,drod five -foot side yard anback distance. However, said increase would rxt be
substenlially mare detrimental to the neighborhood than the existing nonconforming
structure and the addition would have little impact upon the neighborhood.
•
S. Accordingly, by a vox of four (4) in favor (Parent. Hounhen; Tool., Murphy) and
one (1) opposed (Sevran), the Board GRANTS the requested SPECIAL PERMIT relief
under Nantucket Zoning Bylaw Senior 139.33A to allow the alteration and expansion as
prop o..d, adding a second sorry to the exiting rear single -story ponion of the single
family dwelling over Ilse, exiling famprim, wi0,out coming any closer to the westerly
side yard lot line aed without increasing the ground cover ratio, upon the following -
aaditioa: - {
The bearing walls of Ne existingsiogle -story addition shall remain + .
substantiallY inmal and Nose pmtiom ofthoeddition within the westerly five -foot s
xquhed side yard setback axe shall aot be ranoved: and .
b. The addition shell be comtrattd in substantial wofomnarsce with the
Certificate of Appropriateness No. 36, 886, a may ho amended, as Approved by the
Neotuckee Historic District Commission.
Dated: December /(, 2000 }}
D'NeTRartau
William P. Hourihan, Jr. s
V.
wx0t;EU242
(093-M'
;9d,
TGWN Lti`gKB OFFICE
NMITIICNET, MA 76ma T
nMr DEC 11 2000
Nancy S.
x kl
• t@AW't"ixnrAGl'�+uKtLlesaAFfBI JIM
Til @pE090NwAStIfPDINTE5a4TCEOPTNE
rrqq��w(_h41;M9tNATNO,VPE/J, N,ls AL:A
Iqr :Repngzv7foar'�xu.uw5�,3�rdwu
Oaie; JNA' p 3G uZ�"'1 n�� cfa6
Mart �,.,.,�1. l gepluer of OsaOa
F.mi of
Inawm
;oodlbd M242 ,
ra
TOWN CL giVED '
NANiLCItET, MF OY%9ardT
DEC 1122000
nM� zi ru
Nancy
' iP�yTIIATAGT�HAKE]AtStDAPIWI x:08
' TI@�6♦bNWASP1LfDINTIR0..PIOi OPiHE •.
. 1g9gIC9 tRANDTNATNOAPPFA�.N0.43EiN
p{�ARFWLV?fID6c�RILLavn� 1w5�,Ttl1:1
i
Oats: ANN 0 3 2��`1 ��Eqa�.
Priam �,.�1.yt,T 3s0iw otWWa
F,nA of
Imttvmmt
P- � 1-�t C�, �
�- � I+t Ct, L T-
Q�
ARCHITECTS
r lif{ftlt 210M
Bits Plan
tI
:yoi� }•#
�
ti
bi
E6
66
c "IIIIIII ��
A`�iii€
FleerPa
i :.
[pa
il��
ilil{
t_s =E It
d i�
ii
Se
u
il(li
D IE E•f. '!.S
Floor Plms
1
t
•
III'I .
I
IIIIIIII-
•
11 �1
ilk
iuuuul. v
--------------------
9¢EAR TARD SEBAGK
II I�
ID!
Io
N
I ON
IR
PA 9LY I
I I
' - - ❑ KITCHEN
9R
I
'1[ R!F
I
N
TI- P -TI - Pr TI -PI -
�Q II II II II
It II 1
N If II . II II II II
m II II
It II II II I
I �� I II II I� II II I
' i II II II II II II ENTRT
I I II II II II II II I ti -T
I II II II II II II
I II II II II II II
I I II II II II II II
CHARTER STREET
EXI5TING FIR5T FLOOR PLAN
SCALE: 1 /4' = 1' -0"
7' I
WCt'
LI'
1
;i
1 I
1
1 I
i
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
�J
1RL-- -�� ---
T---
IR pry
I I
Dw-
R
PAMLY
QOM '
j I I
vu
0 T
CHARTER STREET
I EXITING FIRST FLOOR PLAN
SCALE I/4" = I'-0
I y�
E' I
i
ii
I i
II
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
00
- -
❑ KRC4gN
I I R
�
D
b
I
�
pit
REP
I
r -n -n - lF M-ter-
__.
I1°
I If II It II 11 11 1
-_ --
II II II 11 It II
I
�
Is
11 II 1�� II II I
II II I�� II 11 I
II II II II II II
ENTRY
I
I
I 11 II II II II II I
H�
I II II II II II II
�
II 11 II II II II
0
I
I
I II II II 11 II II
/
- --
--
CHARTER STREET
I EXITING FIRST FLOOR PLAN
SCALE I/4" = I'-0
I y�
E' I
i
ii
I i
II
I
I
I
I
I
I
ow
IR
FAMMILT
ROOI
GNARTER STREET
oy
3
IOR
I _
n an9Tws REST FLOOR PLAN
h
III
ROB FAMILY
oti
3
Y
f pN IR
1 � _
CHARTER 5TREET
/1 EXISTINn FIRST FLOOR PLAN
II
6mROO'I
�j II No.3
1 UPPER
HALL
0
No.l
3
m�� ���iry�5y�jp
�1
�EXI9TING SECOND FLOOR PLANSECOND FLOOR PLAN
Y
2
0
O
ry� aQ
/;�\ EXISTINC% SECOND FLOOR PLAN
0
E�
�I4
WIO
Lu '
T
w
O
O
a
z
ui
Mai
IS)
X
UJ
UI
�I4
WIO
Lu '
A
w
u
LU
-1
w
W
H
n
N <}
z w
i�l N
91b
I�
a
Q
�Q
iE-
4
a
U
0
a
ul
u
r�3
z
wl
v
ul
a
r�
Z
H
Q
LU
W
W
N
91
I
A
u
N
Pletiffat
4\tqllAre".
kpit;YR,t ' .k,
1p
1"*&':-....,...:q
1:41di-P›,
)
\\... '':---::::::4..-
...„„
TOWN OF NANTUCKET
BOARD OF APPEALS
NANTUCKET, MA 02554
File No.:oss,_ 13 Map 4232 Parce116 5
This agreement to extend the time limit for the Board of Appeals to make a decision,hold a public hearing,or
to take other action concerning the application of:
Ode'eilh;.W-;...:#61'eiK'44e1-14`rtiE14.102."-;661:1fiefftl:diiii•e6i-t.eieet:- .Me§:;;:f:i-i,:;Eil
Pursuant to the provisions of the Acts of 1987,Chapter 498,amending the State Zoning Act,Chapter 40A of
the Massachusetts General Laws,Applicant(s)/Petitioner(s)and the Zoning Board of Appeals hereby agree to
extend the "me limit
For a public hearing on the application
O For a written decision . . .. . . . . _
O For other action -. '.:::WA40-WaarMaVjA";114WM" 81`?Miq .
Such application is:
O An appeal from the decision of any administrative official
0.Z/ A petition for a special permit
oz/
A petition for a variance
O An extension
O A modification
The new time limit shall be midnight on::.:-:litit ,,1 .:10,41:-,::_.:,,::-.,.::_:.;,-,,which is not earlier than
a time limit set by statute or bylaw.
The Applicant(s),attorney,or agent for the Applicant represented to be duly authorized to acilthi;"ffiatter
for the applicant,in executing this agreement waives any rights under the Nantucket Zoning liyhiw agkhe
State Zoning Act,as amended,to the extent,but only to the xtent,inconsistent with this agraihentgo .70
Frl
For Applicant(s)
CD —to <
ie,----L'"------- ■- -..;ikAail='A:- : 'AR-WW.;4:1SNWRKUtgallf*:',=1.iR'.171 r71
C7
For Zoning Board of Appeals
• C..0
r-
fai:444‘20.1q: TownT:lerkmp:
-..,
Effective Date of Agreement --
2 Fairgrounds Road Nantucket Massachusetts 02554
508-228-7215 telephone 508-228-7298 facsimile
i
1