HomeMy WebLinkAbout066-98TOWN OF NANTUCKET
BOARD OF APPEALS
NANTUCKET, MASSACHUSETTS 02554
Date: August ~`~ 19 98
To: Parties in Interest and. Others concerned with the
Decision of the BOARD OF APPEALS in the Application of the
following:
Application No.:
066-98
JAMES M. WATERBURY, JR. AND LINDA
Owner/Applicant:
P. WATERBURY
Enclosed is the Decision of the BOARD OF APPEALS which has
this day been filed in the office of the Nantucket Town
Clerk.
An Appeal from this Decision may be taken pursuant to
Section 17 of Chapter 40A, Massachusetts General Laws.
Any action appealing the Decision must be brought by
filir!g an complaint in court within TWENTY (20) days after
this day's date. Notice of the action with a copy of the
complaint and certified copy of the Decision must be given
to the Town Clerk so as to be received within ~uch TWENTY
(20) days.
e W. Waine hair EIVED
TOWN CLERK'S OFFICE
NANTUrK~' nn? 02554
cc : Town Clerk AUG 17 1998
Planning Board TIME: ~'. -33 ~ ,k,
Building Commissioner ~5s}~
CLERK:
~• PLEASE NOTE: MOST SPECIAL PERMITS AND VARIANCES HAVE A TIME
LIMT.T AND WILL EXPIRE IF NOT ACTED UPON ACCORDING~TO NANTUCKET
ZONING BY-LAW §139-30I (SPECIAL PERMITS); §139-32I (VARIANCES)
ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE CALL THE NANTUCKET ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS.
NANTUCKET ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
37 Washington Street
Nantucket, Massachusetts 02554
7 Willard Street Plan Book 25, Page 54
Assessor's Map 42.4.1, Parcel 17 Lot 24B
Deed Book 504, Page 54 Residential-1
DECISION:
1. At a public hearing of the Nantucket Zoning Board of
Appeals, on Friday, July 10, 1998, at 1:00 P.M., in the
Selectmen's Meeting Room, in the Town and County Building, Broad
Street, Nantucket, Massachusetts, the Board made the following
decision on the application of JAMES M. WATERBURY, JR., and LINDA
P. WATERBURY, c/o Reade & Alger Professional Corporation, Post
Office Box 2669, Nantucket, Massachusetts 02584, File No. 066-98:
2. The applicants are seeking a VARIANCE under Nantucket
Zoning By-law X139-17.A (Height Limitations). The applicants
propose to elevate an existing single-family dwelling so as to
conform to floodplain requirements. The existing height of the
structure above mean grade is 29.5± feet to the peak of the roof,
with the new height to be 33.5± feet; the maximum height allowed
under the By-law is 30 feet above mean grade. The subject
property is nonconforming as to setback, with the structure being
situated 4.3± feet at its closest point from the southerly side
,yard lot line in a district in which minimum side yard setback is
five feet. The applicants also seek a MODIFICATION of a VARIANCE
granted in Board of Appeals Case No. 079-86, or a new VARIANCE
from the requirements of Nantucket Zoning By-law X139-16.A, to
allow said expansion upward within the side yard setback area,
without expansion of the existing footprint and without coming
any closer to the southerly side yard lot line than the present
setback of 4.3± feet as set forth above. The decision in Case
No. 079-86 validated the siting of the existing structure. The
northwesterly boundary line of the subject property has
subsequently been changed, and it is now shown as Lot 24B while
relief was granted in Case No. 079-86 for Lot 24A; however, this
lot line change related to the northwesterly boundary of the
subject property, not the southerly lot line from which the
structure's side yard is nonconforming, and accordingly had no
effect upon the nonconformity of the relief granted in Case No.
079-86. In the alternative, the applicants request a SPECIAL
PERMIT under Nantucket Zoning By-law X139-16.C, to validate an
unintentional setback intrusion of not more than five feet and
not closer than four feet to a lot line, and allow the alteration
as proposed. The subject property (the "Locus") is situated at 7
WILLARD STREET, Assessor's Map 42.4.1, Parcel 17, shown on plan
recorded with Nantucket Deeds in Plan Book 25, Page 54, and is
situated in a Residential-1 zoning district.
3. Our decision is based upon the application and
accompanying materials, and representations and testimony
received at our public hearing. The Planning Board
recommendation was that the subject application was not of
planning concern. There was no support nor opposition presented
at the public hearing.
4. As presented by the applicants at the public hearing,
the existing single-family dwelling upon the Locus, constructed
in 1981 and not conforming to the side yard setback requirement
of five feet from the southeasterly boundary of the Locus, has a
problem with water infiltration on the first floor, and
accordingly the applicants seek to elevate the structure in its
present location so that the first floor will be above ambient
water levels. Under applicable building code requirements in the
area subject to coastal flooding, if the structure is altered it
must be elevated so that the first floor is at least eight feet
above sea level. This would result in the peak of the roof being
raised from its present elevation of about 29.5 feet above mean
grade to about 33.5 feet above mean grade, with the maximum
elevation above mean grade under applicable zoning requirements
being 30 feet. (The structure has an existing roof walk, which
is now elevated above mean grade by about 33.66 feet and will
accordingly be raised to about 37.66 feet above mean grade; this
is not calculated as height above grade, as an ornamental roof
structure.) Furthermore, the nonconforming portion of the
structure will be altered by upward extension within the setback
area.
5. In Case No. 079-86, the Board of Appeals granted relief
to the former owners of the Locus, to permit them to maintain
their structure by validating its siting. At the time of that
decision, in 1986, there was no provision in the Nantucket Zoning
By-law for the granting of such relief by special permit, and
accordingly relief was granted by variance. Subsequently, the
present §139-16.C(2) was added to the By-law, authorizing the
granting of special permit relief to validate unintentional, pre-
1991 setback intrusions of not more than five feet and not closer
than four feet to a lot line, where the Board finds that the
burden of correcting the intrusion substantially outweighs any
benefit to an abutter of eliminating the intrusion. The
dimensional extent of the intrusion in this case now falls within
the parameters for the granting of this special permit relief.
6. By UNANIMOUS vote, the Board of Appeals voted to grant
the requested VARIANCE from the maximum height requirement of 30
feet above mean grade to enable the structure to be elevated by
about four feet so that the roof peak will be about 33.5 feet
above mean grade, upon the condition herein set forth, finding
that owing to circumstances relating to the soil conditions and
topography of the Locus and especially affecting the Locus but
not the Residential-1 zoning district generally, literal
enforcement of the provisions of the By-law would involve
substantial hardship to the applicants, and that desirable relief
may be granted without substantial detriment to the public good
and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the
2
intent or purpose of the By-law. Specifically, the damp
conditions at the Locus and the situation of the Locus within the
floodplain create a hardship for the applicants, and the
elevation .of the structure to comply with building requirements
in the floodplain will result in a public benefit.
7. The Board of Appeals further voted UNANIMOUSLY to issue
a SPECIAL PERMIT under X139-16.C(2), replacing the 1986 variance
and validating the present placement of the structure upon the
Locus, also upon the condition herein set forth, finding that the
burden of correcting the intrusion substantially outweighs any
benefit to an abutter of eliminating the intrusion, and further
authorizing the upward extension of the structure by about four
feet to comply with applicable floodplain requirements as set
forth above.
8. As requested by the applicants in open hearing, the
Board of Appeals further voted UNANIMOUSLY to allow the
withdrawal of the alternative re est for modification of the
1986 variance. ~~ ~~C~,~°~'~~ ~ ~~
9. The relief hereby granted is upon the condition that no
new construction, except for the upward extension as herein
described, shall be performed upon the Locus more than 30 feet
above mean grade without the granting of further relief from the
Board of Appeals.
_ i i l ~.
Dated: August ~7 1998
f:\wp\waterbry\zbadecn.doc
RECEIVED
TOWN CLERK'S OFFICE
NANTIi~K~ rna 02554
AU G 17 1998
TIME: ~'. 33 ~ .+~-c ,
--~
CLERK:
3
Dale W. aine
D
T~inda F. Williams
TOWN OF NANTUCKET
ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
37 WASHINGTON STREET
NANTUCKET, MASSACHUSETTS 02554
PHONE 508-228-7215
FAX 508-228-7205
NOTICE
A Public Hearing of the Nantucket Zoning Board of Appeals will be
held at 1:00 P.M., FRIDAY, JULY 10, 1998, in the CONFERENCE ROOM, TOWN
ANNEX BIIILDING, 37 WASHINGTON STREET, Nantucket, Massachusetts, on the
Application of the following:
JAMES M. WATERBURY, JR. AND LINDA P. WATERBURY
BOARD OF APPEALS FILE N0. 066-98
Applicants are seeking a VARIANCE under Nantucket Zoning By-Law
§139-17A (Height Limitations). Applicants propose to elevate an existing
single-family dwelling so as to conform to floodplain requirements. The
existing height of the structure above mean grade is 29.5+ feet to the
peak of the roof with the new height to be 33.55+ feet in a district that
allows a maximum height limitation of 30 feet. The Locus is non-conforming
as to setback with the structure being sited 4.3+ feet at its closest
point from the southerly side yard lot line in a district that requires a
minimum side yard setback of five (5) feet.
Applicants also seek a MODIFICATION of a VARIANCE granted in BOA
Decision in File No. 079-86, or a new VARIANCE under Nantucket Zoning
By-Law §139-16A, to allow said extension upward within the side yard
setback area, without expansion of the existing footprint or coming any
closer to the southerly side yard lot line than the aforementioned 4.3+
feet. Said Decision validated the siting of the existing structure. The
northwesterly boundary line of the Locus has subsequently been changed,
and the Locus is now shown as Lot 24B while relief was granted in 1986 to
Lot 24A. However, this lot line change is said to have had no effect upon
the non-conformity or the relief granted therein.
In the alternative, the Applicants request a SPECIAL PERMIT under
Nantucket Zoning By-Law §139-16C(2), to validate the unintentional
setback intrusion of not more than five (5) feet and not closer than four
(4) feet to a lot line and allow the alteration as proposed.
The premises is located at 7 WILLARD STREET, Assessor's Map
42.4.1, Parcel 17, Lot 24B, Plan Book 25, Page 54. The property is zoned
Residential-1. ~.AXk W' (~J~
Dale W. Waine, Chairman
THIS NOTICE IS AVAILABLE IN LARGE PRINT OR C~THCR
ALTERNATIVE FORMATS. FOR _ ASSISTANC;~ LALL _ ~_ _!
(.SORr ~~=721 ~ . ~ - - ~- ~ - -
BOA Form 1-89 NANTUCKET ZONING BOARD OF APPEAL:
37 WASHINGTON STREET
NANTUCKET, MASSACHUSETTS 02554
APPLICATION FOR RELIEF
April 1, 1998
CASE No.
Owner's name(s): James M. Waterbury, Jr., and Linda P. Waterbury
Mailing address: c/o Reade, Gullicksen, Hanley & Gifford, LLP
Applicant's name: Same
Mailing address: P.O. Box 2669, Nantucket. Massachusetts 02584
Location of lot: Assessor's map and parcel number 42.4.1-17
Street address: 7 Willard Street
Registry ' ~~~'~~ Plan, Plan Bk & Pg N- "' ,^ °" ~ 25-55 Lot 24B
Date lot acquired: 5/15/96 Deed Ref 504-54 Zoning district RR=1
Uses on lot - commercial: None x or _ MCD? _
- number of: dwellings 1 duplex _ apartments _ rental rooms _
Building date(s): all pre-8/72? No or 1981 C of O? Yes
Building Permit appl'n Nos. 1550-80; 7625-90
Case Nos. all BoA applications, lawsuits: 079-86
State fully all zoning relief sought and respective Code sections
and subsections, specifically what you propose compared to present
and what grounds you urge for BoA to make each finding per Section
139-32A x if Variance, 139-30A x if a Special Permit (and 139-33A
if to alter or extend a nonconforming use). If appeal per 139-31A
& B _, attach decision or orders appealed. OK to attach addendum2
See attached addendum.
Items enclosed as part of this Application: orders- addendum' x
Locus map x Site plan x showing present x + planned x structures
Floor plans present T proposed _ elevations x(HDC approved? _)
Listing lot area x frontage x setbacks x GCR x parking data x
Assessor-certified addressee list 4 sets x mailing labels 2 sets x
$200 fee payable to Town of Nantucket x proof' 'cap' covenant _
1(If an appeal, ask Town Clerk to send Bldg Comr's record to BOA.)
I certify that the requested information submitted .is substantially
complete and true to the best of my knowledge, under the pains and
penalties of perjury. /1
SIGNATURE: ! ~ r~~ "_=~.t _ Attorney/agent x
'(If not owner or owner's attorney, enclose proof of authority)
FOR Bo~A OFFICE USE ~/
Application copies recd: 4 ~/ or € on /~/~a by
One copy filed with Town Clerk on ~~~ by co plete?
One copy each to Planning Bd and Building Dep / / by
$200 fee check given ow ~~urer on / by waived?
Hearing notice posted/76 mailed ~ I & M ~ ~~,' 7/Z~~
Hearing (s) on _/_/_ cont' d to _/_/_, _/_/_ withdrawn? _/T/_
Decision due by _/_/_ made _/_/_ filed TC _/_/_ mailed _/_/_
See related cases lawsuits other
~iECEIVED
T~Ir~IN CLERK'S OFFICE
NAh~TUCKET, ~nA n?554
JUN 2 4 1998
~~ ~1=:
,___ iK: m
f:\wp\Waterbry\waterburyzbaapp.doc
ADDENDUM TO APPLICATION OF
JAMES M. WATERBURY JR. AND LINDA P. WATERBURY
The subject property (the "Locus") is a dimensionally conforming
lot, upon which a dwelling was constructed in 1981 with the
southeasterly side lying 4.3± feet from the southeasterly side
line; minimum setback in this district is five feet. In Case No.
079-86, the Board of Appeals granted variance relief to permit
the then-owners of the Locus to maintain their existing
structure. (The northwesterly boundary line of the Locus has
subsequently been changed, and the Locus is now Lot 25B while
relief was granted in 1986 to Lot 25A, but this lot line change
has no effect upon the nonconformity or the relief granted
therein.)
The applicants now propose to alter the dwelling by elevating it
so as to conform to floodplain requirements. The present
elevation above mean grade is 29.5± feet to the peak of the roof;
the structure will be elevated by about four feet, so elevation
of the roof peak will be 33.5± feet. (The structure has an
existing roof walk, which is now elevated above mean grade by
33.66 feet and.will accordingly be increased to 37.66 feet; this
is not calculated as height above grade, as an ornamental roof
structure, under Zoning By-law §139-17.B(1).
Accordingly, the applicants request relief by Variance, to permit
the existing dwelling to be extended upward within the side yard
setback area, without expansion of the existing footprint, with
the dwelling continuing to have a southerly side yard setback of
about 4.3 feet.
In the alternative, the applicants request that relief by Special
Permit be granted (as now provided for under §139-16.C(2), which
was not in effect at the time of the decision of the Board in
Case No. 079-86 granting variance relief) to validate the
unintentional, pre-1991 setback intrusion of not more than five
feet and not closer than four feet to a lot line, on the basis
that the burden of correcting the intrusion substantially
outweighs any benefit to an abutter of eliminating the intrusion,
and that such Special Permit provide that the structure may be
altered upward within the existing footprint as proposed.
The applicants further request that relief by variance from the
height limitation of thirty feet above Average Mean Grade under
X139-17.A be granted in order to enable the structure to be
elevated to a height at the roof ridge of about 33.55 feet as
proposed.
w:\wp\waterbry\waterburyzbaadd.doc
1
_~_
ss
MANTUCNE7 tOMlERYATION fOUMOA710M. INt,
A 1!
pN
~a
i la
~ iT
~e
s, o S
_~ ~
~ 'f =o
19
\ !e
!9
sSa~~t
14
s1
~~
d
N
~~
t
d
KET ~ °~
M7Ut
~ MA \fC\
IN O y,\ \Y\V'
_ IT'M~ ~ ~ IDS' \v
INH~9 12.1.E-9
8pP•
,.
~~
~,
i
1
i'
J'
1
i
~ I~
0
•-s
At.~.
f~
i
w
'I
z
' fi
it
1 I~
!{
ff
1 ~I.
;i
:i
~~
j li
~ .c
f is
O i !~
O ~ .6
N) ~ ~I
i
N f Da 000 m ! ~`
r
:i.
i~
;~
:~
I.
1~
~~
_`
`~ sy
s.
/V I >`
wt ~uAl~ -~\ c MARY S, Oo'UGyCiZTy
r
~
--
~
~
O ~r-, zs \
E
~
t
CN
y
I
u
1
~ D
•v 8,6 ~r
~ Lo-r Z 4 8 p N
SOT A2EA Go 63 ± S, F ~ G ~
~ s
I
o ~ ~
~
P ~ ~ ~ ~
~°
~
a
ti
' ,zn
~ Z STy W . F; p r ~ ~ ~ ,.
Z CRuSNED S-rctiE UR\vE ~, ~ ~
I
I ~c SEE NwrE I W ~ TI
o
-- //3.37 -' C
t
~ ~
~ ,: ~ g
m ~ ~- i F
~
>
W~41-TEfL FL ~ K ESS
v
I
d x"2.4. f' - l 3
L
N o-rE t SEE Z f3 A
~A R I An-C£
2ELo0.0~,D
,Inl Book- Zr,4~ PAGE 9S
CURRENT ZONING MAP: R-- -%"'~`'
,.-~" ~ ~„ o, 'r\
9
MORTGAGE INSPECTION PLAN
~
MINIMUM LOT SIZE: ~ooo S, ~. ~~r'~~
S~a
~ti/ rv;;cH~AEL cs
MINIMUM FRONTAGE: s~• FT `l
IN
NANTUCKET
MASSACHUSETTS
,
~ ,
~l ~
o Fr.
FRONTYARD SETBACK: / ~ ggCFiM,p.N N SCALE: /'= z ° DATE: A P~ZtL s -9 9 c~
SIDE AND REAR SETBACK: s, Fr. y No
2-ress ,
.
ALLOWABLE G.C.R.: 30'/~ .,°~. ~ ~
.
•
~F
fC PREPARED FOR:
.
_
SS,
IJ~
c
: ZZ.S/o
EXISTING G
C
R DAMES M , c LINDA WATc'~$v/Ly
.
.
. a,~a c.-1asE MA1~µATTA~ i3AK ~
PROPERTY UNES SHOWN ARE TAKEN FROM R COR
DEED AND PLAN REFERED TO HEREON. BUILDINGS, MONUMENTS, NANTUCKET SURVEYORS INC.
ETC. ARE PLOTTED FROM. FIELD MEASUREMENTS. 5 WINDY WAY
I HEREBY CERTIFY TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE NANTUCKET, .MA. 02554
THAT THE PREMISES SH
OWN ON THIS PLAN ARE
A
LOCATED WITHIN THE ELEV, g ZONE AS DELINEATED DEED REFERENCE:Dd ~3~- 3S1 Pv, t4'S
ON THE "FlRM" MAP OF COMMUNITY N0. 250230; PLAN REFERENCE: P~ (itt Zs oL , S.~
MASS. EFFECTIVE: 6-3-86 BY THE FEDERAL ASSESSORS MAP:4Z•4•t PCL. 17
EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY.
N.B. N- ~,2 6 z
1
I
!J
~~
~i.'r •,
~'. ,
~ ~. i
r.,,
l
a'
t
i
1
1
I
. _.~,~
u
Z
2
e
0
2
J
0
On
ova
"~2
~~
NVV
N ~
Z V
U V
W
i
i
~~
S
`s
°¢
0
U
' Z
9
I
M
`~
~C
~ ,~
~ `~~
~r ~ ~ ~ ,
~.w: ~ ~~ ,v~ ,~
C- ~ M `~~
~~ ~ .• ~~~
"J~ ~ •~/.
a
2
0
a
a
h
V
W
L 88 t '1Jr77
~. SZSCt- NN'1d '7'7
7b17 S71b/~OSSb 3iyyn8y7NS
B/ - /'h'lh
0
~
'
~
~~ 7 !O SZ ~G7N
r ~
r
2 ~
W ~
, a
:° ,: >• u
,0 m oc
~
~ J
ti 1
C
'' ~' 2 N rJ
~ K VW
~ ~ 0
J u
~-
0 ~ ~ ~ aJ
a N ~~
,,
a ,
?~
ry M
~J
00
~~
e , O O ~ ~
~~
Q w
Q ~ j ~
t~Y
~
e
V ~ ~ eN~
o
~ 3' W'^ N 0e~~ ~
C.
v ~ 0 ~ ~ H N
~
(~ ~ 4'` ~oec
0 2N~2
,
~ v
Q Q
N
a
' {~
L£
F// ~ ~
., ,
~
~
~ '
W
H
,~
J N
o
J i N
V
N
Q
J
L®Bt '1y7'
y t'7L ~1C Nb7~ •p"/
7Y 17 S'71b/70SSb 7Nynpy7,y5
S/ - /'h'lh
0
o p
o a
a
„~ 0
1 ~
'~ Q
.. 1
o
J
H
V N
Z
~ ~ N H W
C ~ ~ ~ e
a3t ~J
MWW
~~~
~~0
N
2u2
{, ~ 0
? ~`
~?J N
WWW ~
v~c~
e
> ~ Qz
~ ~ ~ W
~ZWO~
.W,~
mno
/ 'f
Q ~ r,~'~'
333x. ~ ~ ~ r~ ~{
\~
\~~ ,~,
~~W;rn~ ~~"~~
N
~I
~ ~ ~ 6~
h 0 J ~ ~~ I o
0 8~ ~ ~ QJ 2
N ~~ ~ 0 O ~ Q \ W
~ Jf
n ~ Q ?nom „~ ~
~~~ m F~ P 2~ ~ ~ a
2 .. Y 2~3 N
4 O W ~ t Q V
`; ~ h 4 ~ J ~ ~w0
~ H ono ~ o ~ b VJO ~~ ~ ~ ~
.~` 2 o Q ~ . ,~ 4
v ~. ~' ,~' W o a o °v .'~ c N
0
2 N~~~ ~ 4 0 ~ i e
c ;, ~\ p p
S 4
~,
i
~ ~ sic
~ ~ ~
~ ~
~ ~ ~
ASSESSORS MAP 42.4.1
tLtV.= guts
PROPOSED TOP OF FOUNDATI[7N
ELEV. = 8.1
SITE PLAN
in
NANTUCKET, MASS.
SCALES 1' = 20'
DATES DECEMBER 10, 1997
JOHN J, SHUGRUE INC.
57 OLD SCIUTH ROAD
NANTUCKET, MA.
JAMES & LINDA P. WATERBURY
PARCEL N0. 17
# 5492-1
',L ~'
I~~ ~ ___
~i0~i
'~C
r~~
ILA
m ~
I__ ~~J
I ~.~-
~/
,__i
-~~
fi
T~i
~~
U /
_-~
/S%
BoA Form
NANTUCKET ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
TOWN-AND COUNTY BUILDING
NANTUCKET, MA 02554
ASSESSORS LIST OF PA~tTIES IN INTEREST
PROPERTY OWNER:
2-89
APPLICANT FOR RELIEF (rS-SAME? ) ~ h'~~t-
ADDRESS OF PROPERTY : .t If"1~~ ~~ -
ASSESSORS MAP & PARCEL: ~Z y . ~ -" Oa ~'~'
LIST OF PARTIES INCLUDING ADDRESSES*(OR SEE ATTACHED
I certify that the foregoing (or the attached-) lists
all persons natural or legal, who are owners of abutting
property owners of land directly opposite cn any public
or private street or way; and abutters of the abutters and
all other land owners within three hundred feet of the
property line of Owner's property, as they ( a^d their
address) appear on the most recent applicable tax list
{per M.G.L. c. 40A, Section 11 Zoning Code Chapter 139,
Section 139-29D (2)}-
~ ~ ,
Date P.ssessors Office
Town of Nantuckz~
*NOTE: Applicant (petitioner) should include with the lot
for which zoning relief is sought, any coml-~only-owned
abutting lots which might beco:~e involved ire the zoninc
matter. List rap and parcels for ea c?. abutter.
•03/26/98 TOWN OF NANTUCKET PAGE 1
14:28:33 OWNER'S MAILING ADDRESS LIST MUAS750 8.5
Map Block Lot Owner's/Co-Owner's Name Mailing Address/City State Zip Property Location
4241 0014 NEWELL THADDEUS & SHERLEY S 0120 TREVOR COURT RD 0015 WILLARD ST
ROCHESTER NY 14610
4241 0015 HESS WALTER R TR PO BOX 1139 0013 WILLARD ST
C/0 WHITE ELEPHANT RESORT NANTUCKET MA 02554
4241 0016 MONROE JAMES L & SANDRA R TRST 15 STANTON CIRCLE 0009 WILLARD ST
MONROE WILLARD ST REALTY TRUST BOXFORD MA 01921
4241 0018 HESS WALTER R TR PO BOX 1139 0003 WILLARD ST
C/0 WHITE ELEPHANT RESORT NANTUCKET MA 02554
4241 0019 HESS WALTER R TR PO BOX 1139 0043 EASTON ST
C/0 WHITE ELEPHANT RESORT NANTUCKET MA 02554
4241 0020 NICHOLSON JEFFREY J DEBORAH E PO SOX 373 0041 EASTON ST
HARDY JANE NICHOLSON NANTUCKET MA 02554
4241 0051 BROWN STILLMAN B 180 FERN STREET 0015 WALSH ST
W HARTFORD CT 06119
4241 0052 JACOBS STEPHEN R & SUZANNE C 1625 STOCTON RD 0013 WALSH ST
MEADOWBROOK PA 19046
4241 0053 KOPACZ JOHN E $ MARTHA E M 0011 CRANBERRY LN 0012 WILLARD ST
NORWELL MA 02061
4241 0055 MURRAY DAVID H JR & KAREN 0 PO BOX 374 0007 4JALSH ST
NANTUCKET MA 02554
4241 0056 REIN HARRY T & SUSAN D 0174 TURTLEBACK ROAD 0003 WALSH ST
NEW CANAAN CT 06840
4241 0057 HESS WALTER R TR PO BOX 1139 0004 WILLARD ST
C/0 WHITE ELEPHANT RESORT NANTUCKET MA 02554
4241 0058 POLLARD GILDA C PO BOX 343 0045 EASTON ST
NANTUCKET MA 02554
4241 0059 POLLARD EDMUND T PO BOX 343 0047 ,EASTON ST
NANTUCKET MA 02554
4241 0081 FORSTER ALAN M & NANCY ANN C 0011 GODFREY LN 0001 SWAIN ST
WESTPORT CT 06880
4241 00824 JAFFE LAURENCE & IMOGENE 4515 DEXTER ST NW 0010 WALSH ST
WASHINGTON DC 20007
4241 0083 SHEA FELICE K 32 WASHINGTON SQ W - APT 7E 0008 WALSH ST
NEW YORK NY 10011
4241 0084 FAIR WIND PARTNERS 5280 N OCEAN DR - APT 5C 0006 WALSH ST
C/0 HOUGHTON ANTHONY J SINGER ISLAND FL 33404-2612
4241 0085 GLIDDEN RICHARD J TR 0037 CENTER ST 0053 EASTON ST
53 EASTON STREET REALTY TR UST NANTUCKET MA 02554
4241 0086 BURTON ROBERT M TR PO BOX 3105 0055 EASTON ST
BURTON FAMILY REALTY TRUST NANTUCKET MA 02584
4241 0013 *BATES BRUCE B ETAL TRUSTEES 507 ALLENS CREEK ROAD 0017 WALSH ST
WILLARD STREET NOMINEE TRU ST ROCHESTER NY 14618-3405
4241 006C HESS WALTER R TR PO BOX 1139 C060 EASTON ST
C/O 41HITE ELEPHANT RESORT NANTUCKET MA 02554
4241 0023 HESS WALTER R TR PO BOX 1139 005D EASTON ST
C/0 WHITc ELEPHANT RESORT NANTUCKET MA 02554
4241 0022 LINCOLN BAYARD R TR 0018 CAMBRIDGE ST 0046 EASTON ST
LINCOLN FAMILY TRUST CHELMSFORD MA 01824
4241 00532 BROWN STILLMAN B 180 FERN STREET 0014 WILLARD ST
W HARTFORD CT 06119
4241 00533 JACOBS STr=PHEN R & SUZANNE 1625 STOCTON RD 0010 WILLARD ST
MEADOWBRGOK PA 19046
• CERTIFICATE NO: "~D q '~ ~~ DATE ISSUED: ~
Application to the HISTORIC DISTRICT COMMISSION, Nantucket, Massachusetts, for a
CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS
for structural work.
Incomplete applications will not be reviewed by the HDC. All blanks must be filled in using BLUE OR BLACK INK (no pencil) or marked N/A.
'This is a contractual agreement and must be filled out in ink. An application is hereby made for issuance of a Certificate of Appropriateness under Chapter 395 of the Acts and
Resolves of Mass., 1970, for proposed work as described herein and on plans, drawings and photographs accompanying this application and made a part hereof by reference.
The certificate is valid for three years from date of issuance. No structure may differ from the approved application. Violation may impede issuance of Certificate of Occupancy.
/PROPERTY DESCRIPTION
TAX MAP N°: ~ ~ , 1, ~ PARCEL N°. ~- 2» FOR OFFICE USE ONLY
o~-
Street & Number of Proposed Work J 1-t ~~ ~.~". Date application received: ~ ee Paid: $ ~
Owner of record: - ~~(. ~A~-~ ~~/, ~ RuP~~•~ Must be acted on by: ~ I I
Mailing Address: j ~FIE~..~ ~. Extend`eCt't
c ~R Approved: ~ is~,p roved:
~ ~ 12a5co~i `~ ~
`75 on island off island Chairman: ,
Telephone: 2~~ - ~~ ( ) ( )
I hereby authorize the agent named below to act on my behalf to make changes in Member: ~ >'-~-~ -
.~,..the specifications or the plans contained in this applic :qh~' rder to bring the ~~ ;'r~" ~____~
application into compliance with the HDC guide ' s. ti:~ Member: - 1 l ` ~ r'-- ~ .. C ~
.. Member: ~---G
re o T Mcner of Record
AGENTT~ INFORMATION (if applicable)
._ ~~' ~`S
' ~ Name: c,~t~rz~s oc~ft~-,_~
~ Mailing Address: ~ ~~/it~.. i~--~~7 ~•~.
Telephone: 22~ ` G`~6~ (on island) (off island
New Dwelling Addition
Color Change .Fence
.Other (please specify)
-_
Size of Structure or Addition: Length: ~` Sq. Footage 1st floor: ~~'. Decks: Size: ~X!~ - _~t floor ._- 2nd floor
Width: lg ~ I ~ Sq. footage 2nd floor: Size: __ 1st floor - 2nd floor
Sq. footage 3rd floor:
Difference between existing grade and proposed finish grade: North ~ South yes East ~ West
Height of ridge above final finish grade: North ~ ~r -~~~ South ~~ ~ h ~~ East `(r~~ - ~ r' West I ~~' Io "
Additional Remarks '/ REVISIONS` 1. East Elevation
Historic Name: \\/.dae ~~-~t ~ (describe)
2. South Elevation
Original Date:
3. West Elevation
Original Builder: 4. North Elevation
Is there an HDC survey form for this building? ^ Yes ^ No 'Cloud on drawings and submit photographs of existing elevations.
DETAIL OF WORK TO BE PERFORMED
Foundation: Height Exposed ~~~ Block ~_~ Block Parged IJ Brick (type) !'"Poured Concrete ..Piers
Masonry Chimney: Block Parged 'Brick (type) ~'o~~~ro~-~ w~ ~~ ~~ _' Other
Roof Pitch: Main Mass x/12 Secondary Mass ~ /12 Dormer 'J -/12 Other
Roofing material: ~sphalt Manufacturer ~ -`v Fence: Height:
Fiberglass Manufacturer Length: _ ~
l Wood (Type: Red Cedar, White Cedar, Shakes, etc.) Type:
Skylights (flat only): Manufacturer Model No. Size Location
Manufacturer Model No. Size Location
Gutters: ~ /Wood (type) 4 K S' ^ Aluminum ^ Copper
Leaders (material and size): ~ ~ ~~/onc>
Sidewall: /White cedar shingles ^ Clapboard (exposure: inches) Front only
l J Other
Trim: Lumber type Pine
Treatment t/~'aint
Dimensions:
Redwood -~edar '_~~ Other
~__: Stain-solid r__. Natural to weather ^ Clear oil finish
Fascia (x P~ Rake ~ ~'~
Frieze
' Windows: 'Double Hung 'Casement Other
True Divided Lights(muntins) Snap-in Grilles
' Doors (type and material): Front
Garage Door(s): Type
r•
Soffit (Overhang) ~~_ Corner boards ~
Door Frame E '~ ~~ Other
Rear E~.,7v..j. - l err wc~tiL%
Material
Side _.;cL;r> ~~.~rt,y 1_ ~..~-~.~
a
Landscape materials: Driveways Walkways ~,a_~,-~.~_ Walls.
Note: Complete door and window schedules are required.
,. s COLORS
Sidewall Clapboard (if applicable) Roof
Trim Sash Doors
Deck Foundation Fence Shutters
' Attach manufacturer's color samples.
Window Casing X`
Note: It is strongly recommended that the applicant be familiar with the HDC guidelines, Building with Nantucket in Mind, prior to submittal of application. Please see other
_. _
side for submittal requirements.
I hereby agree to abide by and comply with the terms and conditions of this application. ~, ~~~ ~ ~'
Date Signature of owner of record f ~~.~<`~~~' r Signed under penalties of perjury
Member:
Notes -Comments -Restrictions - Condit~'ortis
~ ~~ ~~~ ~
DESCRIPTION OF WORK TO BE PERFORMED
See reverse for required documentation.
Garage Garage/Apartment Commercial Historical Renovation Deck
Gate Paving Move Building Demolition 1 Revisions to previous Cert. No
Steps Shed
IIr _= ~~;i
Lt~I
------1
.L I /
~ I
~ '~
~
II
_.. L---- --~--
~.A~ --
Ii ~\ ~ 1
~,
I ' ' 'l
a__
~, ~ _T
_ -.
----- --
~._.__
r
c~
+.r
~ .C
~
~ ~
O
U '~
~
.C
~
~ v
~
U ~
~
~ ~ U
CJ
b aj
~ Q
~1 c~
.,
C
w ~ xo
„ ~ ~ c~:
~ ~ C,V
c,
V'
~
~ ~ ~
, _
j l~
r
7 . ~ ~+
f ..
` ~~
nn~
L~ ~J
D co
r
' ~ d.
W
~n~ C!~
1~:~
I
«-i
I
~I
'~
~!
I
G
~I
~; ,/ ~ ~
~ = cf) ;
{ ~ ~
; z
- -.. - _- -; _. - 2 9 3.58
- _
~ i.'-- ._ m~ _ -- - 203.55 (Field) (Held )
90.03(Field)SHeld) ~" - 203.46
- ~ ~~ - ~ ~ - (Rec, )
,,
... \- 90.00 (Rec.) ~ ~ ~ ~ •
,' ~ ~; 49.0 ~ ~ ~ .~ ~ ~ ~ - 04 ~~
r ~, 3 ~ ~ ,.. 46.
~-> ,~, EASEMENT-,~ 1 ~,~;~ 41.00: , . -,-..I~~ T. _
~ ~ 10.29 =_-~ .. _.. ~£~7D - 8.8G' i G ~ ~ rn ; ~_
~ 1 wo ~ f Tory ~ ~- ~!I I/Z sto ~' o.
- (`- .0.75 rome ~r'~ rY `~ '' `~ ~'
~~ - - dwellin ~ ~^rood frame, d• _..~,
~ ~ dwelling ' ~: a._ ~
r ~I ~ ~ C i L ~~~ ~ '~, i
i ',~.`' ,S ~ ~ 8rS Fbrch
~.
I ~ w ~~ ~~3, o - --- ~, ~ o col ' i~
' z~ ~ 2 M d
~.~ ~ ;,_ ., 51.10 __-- •..`(\ ~ l'T: 36 ~/ ,,, t ~
li ~ ~ r r
N ~a.~ N~ . , ; - _5,5..00 - ~}'~~~ o ~ 1
~ ( --47.10 - , ~(lo:,..Wi~p ~ ,v~ ~ 2 storryy i ~.
~ J ` -, -1 , /~ 59:Op»- ~ ~ j awed fry 1
d' '1 j~ ' g `a~ ~' ~ o ling
~ ... Z ~ ~ ~? ~ 8. F33 ~ ' Iii ~''~~J~ C/) S. OS ~
1-- ~ .. _ _ -~_~
,.~ ~` I 8.38 ~L ( r,
N ~ story wood ~ L.. I .I/2 ;story ~~ m .__..~ %~
~~ I ~ ( frame dwe~' ~ wood ' fYnme - - "' ; - ! ~
N i'~ _!3,3e- ~ i dwelling. ~ ~ ---~____ `~ _
~~._
-.--~ _ ~ ~ ,S 5.79 (Rc~cJ - ~ ~' ;~~ `;,~ S ?g ~ 4?~ 10" ~ _~___ 11
`~l 8 2 ° ~.` 18'.' I ao~ ~ `~,~ ,, ' ~ ` , ...~~ 130.1 ~
W ~ '~
. - ,; 9
. .
• ~,~ -
_...__ ^•4: --~;--.~ ~_ _..... ._.,. .~ i ~. ~ ~1 ~Y _ry. -111(
p w ~ ~~ j; ~ _ •• • ' .. s''ar•c are reminded t
' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~_ ~..,. ,. hat no work
~- ~ ~ ~~ r,_ I o •.~ ._ ... .. ,~~eetticatr~n,~ wit~,~t Irrinr - -
...~ LL Q1 9fi 'N .,-~'~ .:. " ~'; ~ b i ~/ ~ %If f1-f71.`i~~llill-
0 1, Q o ~ ~ ~. .,~Pi1 N ~j 16 i4 ~,V -
z ~ ~ i ,i, ' \2-~ 82~
~"`"" I 128.84 Rec.
~ 5.06 ~ _ ,._ ._~.,.......
~~~ I ~ N 86° IJ ~ 3 I ~~ W
.... . , 'i L I, r .
`~ S ~ ,, ~~ ,I .. ~
` ~; nJ Al
- ~~~ ~.,
S~. "' i I~ O ~ .
.~' vi'' I ~ .~. ~ $~ - L.IIV DA F9OL~q~~ D
~~ ~ ~ ~ LOT A
i ~ ~ I_.C. PI . 180?3 - 8
~~ ,~ ~ ~~ CST: 4593 C~
_ ~,. ~ ~ --
9,-3.95.
1 G'. i - I
~ L ,~ 1
1~-_~ ~ ___ _.-__~
-`0.05 ! ~ __" J I
,.
03/26/98 TOWN OF NANTUCKET
14:28:33 OWNER`S MAILING ADDRESS LIST
Map Block Lot Owner's/Co-Owner's Name Mailing Address/City State Zip Property Location
0029 0034 *BATES BRUCE B ETAL TRUSTEES 507 ALLENS CREEK RD 0021 WILLARD ST
WILLARD STREET NOMINEE TRUST ROCHESTER NY 14618-3405
0029 0028 NANTUCKET CONSERVATION FOUND I PO BOX 13 0039 EASTON ST
NANTUCKET MA 02554
0029 0077 LOWE SHERON C ETAL PO BOX 689 0028 HULBERT AV
C/0 CRAIG ALEXANDER M JR NANTUCKET MA 02554
PAGE 2
MUAS750 8.5
NUMBER OF RECORDS = 29