Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout066-98TOWN OF NANTUCKET BOARD OF APPEALS NANTUCKET, MASSACHUSETTS 02554 Date: August ~`~ 19 98 To: Parties in Interest and. Others concerned with the Decision of the BOARD OF APPEALS in the Application of the following: Application No.: 066-98 JAMES M. WATERBURY, JR. AND LINDA Owner/Applicant: P. WATERBURY Enclosed is the Decision of the BOARD OF APPEALS which has this day been filed in the office of the Nantucket Town Clerk. An Appeal from this Decision may be taken pursuant to Section 17 of Chapter 40A, Massachusetts General Laws. Any action appealing the Decision must be brought by filir!g an complaint in court within TWENTY (20) days after this day's date. Notice of the action with a copy of the complaint and certified copy of the Decision must be given to the Town Clerk so as to be received within ~uch TWENTY (20) days. e W. Waine hair EIVED TOWN CLERK'S OFFICE NANTUrK~' nn? 02554 cc : Town Clerk AUG 17 1998 Planning Board TIME: ~'. -33 ~ ,k, Building Commissioner ~5s}~ CLERK: ~• PLEASE NOTE: MOST SPECIAL PERMITS AND VARIANCES HAVE A TIME LIMT.T AND WILL EXPIRE IF NOT ACTED UPON ACCORDING~TO NANTUCKET ZONING BY-LAW §139-30I (SPECIAL PERMITS); §139-32I (VARIANCES) ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE CALL THE NANTUCKET ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS. NANTUCKET ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS 37 Washington Street Nantucket, Massachusetts 02554 7 Willard Street Plan Book 25, Page 54 Assessor's Map 42.4.1, Parcel 17 Lot 24B Deed Book 504, Page 54 Residential-1 DECISION: 1. At a public hearing of the Nantucket Zoning Board of Appeals, on Friday, July 10, 1998, at 1:00 P.M., in the Selectmen's Meeting Room, in the Town and County Building, Broad Street, Nantucket, Massachusetts, the Board made the following decision on the application of JAMES M. WATERBURY, JR., and LINDA P. WATERBURY, c/o Reade & Alger Professional Corporation, Post Office Box 2669, Nantucket, Massachusetts 02584, File No. 066-98: 2. The applicants are seeking a VARIANCE under Nantucket Zoning By-law X139-17.A (Height Limitations). The applicants propose to elevate an existing single-family dwelling so as to conform to floodplain requirements. The existing height of the structure above mean grade is 29.5± feet to the peak of the roof, with the new height to be 33.5± feet; the maximum height allowed under the By-law is 30 feet above mean grade. The subject property is nonconforming as to setback, with the structure being situated 4.3± feet at its closest point from the southerly side ,yard lot line in a district in which minimum side yard setback is five feet. The applicants also seek a MODIFICATION of a VARIANCE granted in Board of Appeals Case No. 079-86, or a new VARIANCE from the requirements of Nantucket Zoning By-law X139-16.A, to allow said expansion upward within the side yard setback area, without expansion of the existing footprint and without coming any closer to the southerly side yard lot line than the present setback of 4.3± feet as set forth above. The decision in Case No. 079-86 validated the siting of the existing structure. The northwesterly boundary line of the subject property has subsequently been changed, and it is now shown as Lot 24B while relief was granted in Case No. 079-86 for Lot 24A; however, this lot line change related to the northwesterly boundary of the subject property, not the southerly lot line from which the structure's side yard is nonconforming, and accordingly had no effect upon the nonconformity of the relief granted in Case No. 079-86. In the alternative, the applicants request a SPECIAL PERMIT under Nantucket Zoning By-law X139-16.C, to validate an unintentional setback intrusion of not more than five feet and not closer than four feet to a lot line, and allow the alteration as proposed. The subject property (the "Locus") is situated at 7 WILLARD STREET, Assessor's Map 42.4.1, Parcel 17, shown on plan recorded with Nantucket Deeds in Plan Book 25, Page 54, and is situated in a Residential-1 zoning district. 3. Our decision is based upon the application and accompanying materials, and representations and testimony received at our public hearing. The Planning Board recommendation was that the subject application was not of planning concern. There was no support nor opposition presented at the public hearing. 4. As presented by the applicants at the public hearing, the existing single-family dwelling upon the Locus, constructed in 1981 and not conforming to the side yard setback requirement of five feet from the southeasterly boundary of the Locus, has a problem with water infiltration on the first floor, and accordingly the applicants seek to elevate the structure in its present location so that the first floor will be above ambient water levels. Under applicable building code requirements in the area subject to coastal flooding, if the structure is altered it must be elevated so that the first floor is at least eight feet above sea level. This would result in the peak of the roof being raised from its present elevation of about 29.5 feet above mean grade to about 33.5 feet above mean grade, with the maximum elevation above mean grade under applicable zoning requirements being 30 feet. (The structure has an existing roof walk, which is now elevated above mean grade by about 33.66 feet and will accordingly be raised to about 37.66 feet above mean grade; this is not calculated as height above grade, as an ornamental roof structure.) Furthermore, the nonconforming portion of the structure will be altered by upward extension within the setback area. 5. In Case No. 079-86, the Board of Appeals granted relief to the former owners of the Locus, to permit them to maintain their structure by validating its siting. At the time of that decision, in 1986, there was no provision in the Nantucket Zoning By-law for the granting of such relief by special permit, and accordingly relief was granted by variance. Subsequently, the present §139-16.C(2) was added to the By-law, authorizing the granting of special permit relief to validate unintentional, pre- 1991 setback intrusions of not more than five feet and not closer than four feet to a lot line, where the Board finds that the burden of correcting the intrusion substantially outweighs any benefit to an abutter of eliminating the intrusion. The dimensional extent of the intrusion in this case now falls within the parameters for the granting of this special permit relief. 6. By UNANIMOUS vote, the Board of Appeals voted to grant the requested VARIANCE from the maximum height requirement of 30 feet above mean grade to enable the structure to be elevated by about four feet so that the roof peak will be about 33.5 feet above mean grade, upon the condition herein set forth, finding that owing to circumstances relating to the soil conditions and topography of the Locus and especially affecting the Locus but not the Residential-1 zoning district generally, literal enforcement of the provisions of the By-law would involve substantial hardship to the applicants, and that desirable relief may be granted without substantial detriment to the public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the 2 intent or purpose of the By-law. Specifically, the damp conditions at the Locus and the situation of the Locus within the floodplain create a hardship for the applicants, and the elevation .of the structure to comply with building requirements in the floodplain will result in a public benefit. 7. The Board of Appeals further voted UNANIMOUSLY to issue a SPECIAL PERMIT under X139-16.C(2), replacing the 1986 variance and validating the present placement of the structure upon the Locus, also upon the condition herein set forth, finding that the burden of correcting the intrusion substantially outweighs any benefit to an abutter of eliminating the intrusion, and further authorizing the upward extension of the structure by about four feet to comply with applicable floodplain requirements as set forth above. 8. As requested by the applicants in open hearing, the Board of Appeals further voted UNANIMOUSLY to allow the withdrawal of the alternative re est for modification of the 1986 variance. ~~ ~~C~,~°~'~~ ~ ~~ 9. The relief hereby granted is upon the condition that no new construction, except for the upward extension as herein described, shall be performed upon the Locus more than 30 feet above mean grade without the granting of further relief from the Board of Appeals. _ i i l ~. Dated: August ~7 1998 f:\wp\waterbry\zbadecn.doc RECEIVED TOWN CLERK'S OFFICE NANTIi~K~ rna 02554 AU G 17 1998 TIME: ~'. 33 ~ .+~-c , --~ CLERK: 3 Dale W. aine D T~inda F. Williams TOWN OF NANTUCKET ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS 37 WASHINGTON STREET NANTUCKET, MASSACHUSETTS 02554 PHONE 508-228-7215 FAX 508-228-7205 NOTICE A Public Hearing of the Nantucket Zoning Board of Appeals will be held at 1:00 P.M., FRIDAY, JULY 10, 1998, in the CONFERENCE ROOM, TOWN ANNEX BIIILDING, 37 WASHINGTON STREET, Nantucket, Massachusetts, on the Application of the following: JAMES M. WATERBURY, JR. AND LINDA P. WATERBURY BOARD OF APPEALS FILE N0. 066-98 Applicants are seeking a VARIANCE under Nantucket Zoning By-Law §139-17A (Height Limitations). Applicants propose to elevate an existing single-family dwelling so as to conform to floodplain requirements. The existing height of the structure above mean grade is 29.5+ feet to the peak of the roof with the new height to be 33.55+ feet in a district that allows a maximum height limitation of 30 feet. The Locus is non-conforming as to setback with the structure being sited 4.3+ feet at its closest point from the southerly side yard lot line in a district that requires a minimum side yard setback of five (5) feet. Applicants also seek a MODIFICATION of a VARIANCE granted in BOA Decision in File No. 079-86, or a new VARIANCE under Nantucket Zoning By-Law §139-16A, to allow said extension upward within the side yard setback area, without expansion of the existing footprint or coming any closer to the southerly side yard lot line than the aforementioned 4.3+ feet. Said Decision validated the siting of the existing structure. The northwesterly boundary line of the Locus has subsequently been changed, and the Locus is now shown as Lot 24B while relief was granted in 1986 to Lot 24A. However, this lot line change is said to have had no effect upon the non-conformity or the relief granted therein. In the alternative, the Applicants request a SPECIAL PERMIT under Nantucket Zoning By-Law §139-16C(2), to validate the unintentional setback intrusion of not more than five (5) feet and not closer than four (4) feet to a lot line and allow the alteration as proposed. The premises is located at 7 WILLARD STREET, Assessor's Map 42.4.1, Parcel 17, Lot 24B, Plan Book 25, Page 54. The property is zoned Residential-1. ~.AXk W' (~J~ Dale W. Waine, Chairman THIS NOTICE IS AVAILABLE IN LARGE PRINT OR C~THCR ALTERNATIVE FORMATS. FOR _ ASSISTANC;~ LALL _ ~_ _! (.SORr ~~=721 ~ . ~ - - ~- ~ - - BOA Form 1-89 NANTUCKET ZONING BOARD OF APPEAL: 37 WASHINGTON STREET NANTUCKET, MASSACHUSETTS 02554 APPLICATION FOR RELIEF April 1, 1998 CASE No. Owner's name(s): James M. Waterbury, Jr., and Linda P. Waterbury Mailing address: c/o Reade, Gullicksen, Hanley & Gifford, LLP Applicant's name: Same Mailing address: P.O. Box 2669, Nantucket. Massachusetts 02584 Location of lot: Assessor's map and parcel number 42.4.1-17 Street address: 7 Willard Street Registry ' ~~~'~~ Plan, Plan Bk & Pg N- "' ,^ °" ~ 25-55 Lot 24B Date lot acquired: 5/15/96 Deed Ref 504-54 Zoning district RR=1 Uses on lot - commercial: None x or _ MCD? _ - number of: dwellings 1 duplex _ apartments _ rental rooms _ Building date(s): all pre-8/72? No or 1981 C of O? Yes Building Permit appl'n Nos. 1550-80; 7625-90 Case Nos. all BoA applications, lawsuits: 079-86 State fully all zoning relief sought and respective Code sections and subsections, specifically what you propose compared to present and what grounds you urge for BoA to make each finding per Section 139-32A x if Variance, 139-30A x if a Special Permit (and 139-33A if to alter or extend a nonconforming use). If appeal per 139-31A & B _, attach decision or orders appealed. OK to attach addendum2 See attached addendum. Items enclosed as part of this Application: orders- addendum' x Locus map x Site plan x showing present x + planned x structures Floor plans present T proposed _ elevations x(HDC approved? _) Listing lot area x frontage x setbacks x GCR x parking data x Assessor-certified addressee list 4 sets x mailing labels 2 sets x $200 fee payable to Town of Nantucket x proof' 'cap' covenant _ 1(If an appeal, ask Town Clerk to send Bldg Comr's record to BOA.) I certify that the requested information submitted .is substantially complete and true to the best of my knowledge, under the pains and penalties of perjury. /1 SIGNATURE: ! ~ r~~ "_=~.t _ Attorney/agent x '(If not owner or owner's attorney, enclose proof of authority) FOR Bo~A OFFICE USE ~/ Application copies recd: 4 ~/ or € on /~/~a by One copy filed with Town Clerk on ~~~ by co plete? One copy each to Planning Bd and Building Dep / / by $200 fee check given ow ~~urer on / by waived? Hearing notice posted/76 mailed ~ I & M ~ ~~,' 7/Z~~ Hearing (s) on _/_/_ cont' d to _/_/_, _/_/_ withdrawn? _/T/_ Decision due by _/_/_ made _/_/_ filed TC _/_/_ mailed _/_/_ See related cases lawsuits other ~iECEIVED T~Ir~IN CLERK'S OFFICE NAh~TUCKET, ~nA n?554 JUN 2 4 1998 ~~ ~1=: ,___ iK: m f:\wp\Waterbry\waterburyzbaapp.doc ADDENDUM TO APPLICATION OF JAMES M. WATERBURY JR. AND LINDA P. WATERBURY The subject property (the "Locus") is a dimensionally conforming lot, upon which a dwelling was constructed in 1981 with the southeasterly side lying 4.3± feet from the southeasterly side line; minimum setback in this district is five feet. In Case No. 079-86, the Board of Appeals granted variance relief to permit the then-owners of the Locus to maintain their existing structure. (The northwesterly boundary line of the Locus has subsequently been changed, and the Locus is now Lot 25B while relief was granted in 1986 to Lot 25A, but this lot line change has no effect upon the nonconformity or the relief granted therein.) The applicants now propose to alter the dwelling by elevating it so as to conform to floodplain requirements. The present elevation above mean grade is 29.5± feet to the peak of the roof; the structure will be elevated by about four feet, so elevation of the roof peak will be 33.5± feet. (The structure has an existing roof walk, which is now elevated above mean grade by 33.66 feet and.will accordingly be increased to 37.66 feet; this is not calculated as height above grade, as an ornamental roof structure, under Zoning By-law §139-17.B(1). Accordingly, the applicants request relief by Variance, to permit the existing dwelling to be extended upward within the side yard setback area, without expansion of the existing footprint, with the dwelling continuing to have a southerly side yard setback of about 4.3 feet. In the alternative, the applicants request that relief by Special Permit be granted (as now provided for under §139-16.C(2), which was not in effect at the time of the decision of the Board in Case No. 079-86 granting variance relief) to validate the unintentional, pre-1991 setback intrusion of not more than five feet and not closer than four feet to a lot line, on the basis that the burden of correcting the intrusion substantially outweighs any benefit to an abutter of eliminating the intrusion, and that such Special Permit provide that the structure may be altered upward within the existing footprint as proposed. The applicants further request that relief by variance from the height limitation of thirty feet above Average Mean Grade under X139-17.A be granted in order to enable the structure to be elevated to a height at the roof ridge of about 33.55 feet as proposed. w:\wp\waterbry\waterburyzbaadd.doc 1 _~_ ss MANTUCNE7 tOMlERYATION fOUMOA710M. INt, A 1! pN ~a i la ~ iT ~e s, o S _~ ~ ~ 'f =o 19 \ !e !9 sSa~~t 14 s1 ~~ d N ~~ t d KET ~ °~ M7Ut ~ MA \fC\ IN O y,\ \Y\V' _ IT'M~ ~ ~ IDS' \v INH~9 12.1.E-9 8pP• ,. ~~ ~, i 1 i' J' 1 i ~ I~ 0 •-s At.~. f~ i w 'I z ' fi it 1 I~ !{ ff 1 ~I. ;i :i ~~ j li ~ .c f is O i !~ O ~ .6 N) ~ ~I i N f Da 000 m ! ~` r :i. i~ ;~ :~ I. 1~ ~~ _` `~ sy s. /V I >` wt ~uAl~ -~\ c MARY S, Oo'UGyCiZTy r ~ -- ~ ~ O ~r-, zs \ E ~ t CN y I u 1 ~ D •v 8,6 ~r ~ Lo-r Z 4 8 p N SOT A2EA Go 63 ± S, F ~ G ~ ~ s I o ~ ~ ~ P ~ ~ ~ ~ ~° ~ a ti ' ,zn ~ Z STy W . F; p r ~ ~ ~ ,. Z CRuSNED S-rctiE UR\vE ~, ~ ~ I I ~c SEE NwrE I W ~ TI o -- //3.37 -' C t ~ ~ ~ ,: ~ g m ~ ~- i F ~ > W~41-TEfL FL ~ K ESS v I d x"2.4. f' - l 3 L N o-rE t SEE Z f3 A ~A R I An-C£ 2ELo0.0~,D ,Inl Book- Zr,4~ PAGE 9S CURRENT ZONING MAP: R-- -%"'~`' ,.-~" ~ ~„ o, 'r\ 9 MORTGAGE INSPECTION PLAN ~ MINIMUM LOT SIZE: ~ooo S, ~. ~~r'~~ S~a ~ti/ rv;;cH~AEL cs MINIMUM FRONTAGE: s~• FT `l IN NANTUCKET MASSACHUSETTS , ~ , ~l ~ o Fr. FRONTYARD SETBACK: / ~ ggCFiM,p.N N SCALE: /'= z ° DATE: A P~ZtL s -9 9 c~ SIDE AND REAR SETBACK: s, Fr. y No 2-ress , . ALLOWABLE G.C.R.: 30'/~ .,°~. ~ ~ . • ~F fC PREPARED FOR: . _ SS, IJ~ c : ZZ.S/o EXISTING G C R DAMES M , c LINDA WATc'~$v/Ly . . . a,~a c.-1asE MA1~µATTA~ i3AK ~ PROPERTY UNES SHOWN ARE TAKEN FROM R COR DEED AND PLAN REFERED TO HEREON. BUILDINGS, MONUMENTS, NANTUCKET SURVEYORS INC. ETC. ARE PLOTTED FROM. FIELD MEASUREMENTS. 5 WINDY WAY I HEREBY CERTIFY TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE NANTUCKET, .MA. 02554 THAT THE PREMISES SH OWN ON THIS PLAN ARE A LOCATED WITHIN THE ELEV, g ZONE AS DELINEATED DEED REFERENCE:Dd ~3~- 3S1 Pv, t4'S ON THE "FlRM" MAP OF COMMUNITY N0. 250230; PLAN REFERENCE: P~ (itt Zs oL , S.~ MASS. EFFECTIVE: 6-3-86 BY THE FEDERAL ASSESSORS MAP:4Z•4•t PCL. 17 EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY. N.B. N- ~,2 6 z 1 I !J ~~ ~i.'r •, ~'. , ~ ~. i r.,, l a' t i 1 1 I . _.~,~ u Z 2 e 0 2 J 0 On ova "~2 ~~ NVV N ~ Z V U V W i i ~~ S `s °¢ 0 U ' Z 9 I M `~ ~C ~ ,~ ~ `~~ ~r ~ ~ ~ , ~.w: ~ ~~ ,v~ ,~ C- ~ M `~~ ~~ ~ .• ~~~ "J~ ~ •~/. a 2 0 a a h V W L 88 t '1Jr77 ~. SZSCt- NN'1d '7'7 7b17 S71b/~OSSb 3iyyn8y7NS B/ - /'h'lh 0 ~ ' ~ ~~ 7 !O SZ ~G7N r ~ r 2 ~ W ~ , a :° ,: >• u ,0 m oc ~ ~ J ti 1 C '' ~' 2 N rJ ~ K VW ~ ~ 0 J u ~- 0 ~ ~ ~ aJ a N ~~ ,, a , ?~ ry M ~J 00 ~~ e , O O ~ ~ ~~ Q w Q ~ j ~ t~Y ~ e V ~ ~ eN~ o ~ 3' W'^ N 0e~~ ~ C. v ~ 0 ~ ~ H N ~ (~ ~ 4'` ~oec 0 2N~2 , ~ v Q Q N a ' {~ L£ F// ~ ~ ., , ~ ~ ~ ' W H ,~ J N o J i N V N Q J L®Bt '1y7' y t'7L ~1C Nb7~ •p"/ 7Y 17 S'71b/70SSb 7Nynpy7,y5 S/ - /'h'lh 0 o p o a a „~ 0 1 ~ '~ Q .. 1 o J H V N Z ~ ~ N H W C ~ ~ ~ e a3t ~J MWW ~~~ ~~0 N 2u2 {, ~ 0 ? ~` ~?J N WWW ~ v~c~ e > ~ Qz ~ ~ ~ W ~ZWO~ .W,~ mno / 'f Q ~ r,~'~' 333x. ~ ~ ~ r~ ~{ \~ \~~ ,~, ~~W;rn~ ~~"~~ N ~I ~ ~ ~ 6~ h 0 J ~ ~~ I o 0 8~ ~ ~ QJ 2 N ~~ ~ 0 O ~ Q \ W ~ Jf n ~ Q ?nom „~ ~ ~~~ m F~ P 2~ ~ ~ a 2 .. Y 2~3 N 4 O W ~ t Q V `; ~ h 4 ~ J ~ ~w0 ~ H ono ~ o ~ b VJO ~~ ~ ~ ~ .~` 2 o Q ~ . ,~ 4 v ~. ~' ,~' W o a o °v .'~ c N 0 2 N~~~ ~ 4 0 ~ i e c ;, ~\ p p S 4 ~, i ~ ~ sic ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ASSESSORS MAP 42.4.1 tLtV.= guts PROPOSED TOP OF FOUNDATI[7N ELEV. = 8.1 SITE PLAN in NANTUCKET, MASS. SCALES 1' = 20' DATES DECEMBER 10, 1997 JOHN J, SHUGRUE INC. 57 OLD SCIUTH ROAD NANTUCKET, MA. JAMES & LINDA P. WATERBURY PARCEL N0. 17 # 5492-1 ',L ~' I~~ ~ ___ ~i0~i '~C r~~ ILA m ~ I__ ~~J I ~.~- ~/ ,__i -~~ fi T~i ~~ U / _-~ /S% BoA Form NANTUCKET ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS TOWN-AND COUNTY BUILDING NANTUCKET, MA 02554 ASSESSORS LIST OF PA~tTIES IN INTEREST PROPERTY OWNER: 2-89 APPLICANT FOR RELIEF (rS-SAME? ) ~ h'~~t- ADDRESS OF PROPERTY : .t If"1~~ ~~ - ASSESSORS MAP & PARCEL: ~Z y . ~ -" Oa ~'~' LIST OF PARTIES INCLUDING ADDRESSES*(OR SEE ATTACHED I certify that the foregoing (or the attached-) lists all persons natural or legal, who are owners of abutting property owners of land directly opposite cn any public or private street or way; and abutters of the abutters and all other land owners within three hundred feet of the property line of Owner's property, as they ( a^d their address) appear on the most recent applicable tax list {per M.G.L. c. 40A, Section 11 Zoning Code Chapter 139, Section 139-29D (2)}- ~ ~ , Date P.ssessors Office Town of Nantuckz~ *NOTE: Applicant (petitioner) should include with the lot for which zoning relief is sought, any coml-~only-owned abutting lots which might beco:~e involved ire the zoninc matter. List rap and parcels for ea c?. abutter. •03/26/98 TOWN OF NANTUCKET PAGE 1 14:28:33 OWNER'S MAILING ADDRESS LIST MUAS750 8.5 Map Block Lot Owner's/Co-Owner's Name Mailing Address/City State Zip Property Location 4241 0014 NEWELL THADDEUS & SHERLEY S 0120 TREVOR COURT RD 0015 WILLARD ST ROCHESTER NY 14610 4241 0015 HESS WALTER R TR PO BOX 1139 0013 WILLARD ST C/0 WHITE ELEPHANT RESORT NANTUCKET MA 02554 4241 0016 MONROE JAMES L & SANDRA R TRST 15 STANTON CIRCLE 0009 WILLARD ST MONROE WILLARD ST REALTY TRUST BOXFORD MA 01921 4241 0018 HESS WALTER R TR PO BOX 1139 0003 WILLARD ST C/0 WHITE ELEPHANT RESORT NANTUCKET MA 02554 4241 0019 HESS WALTER R TR PO BOX 1139 0043 EASTON ST C/0 WHITE ELEPHANT RESORT NANTUCKET MA 02554 4241 0020 NICHOLSON JEFFREY J DEBORAH E PO SOX 373 0041 EASTON ST HARDY JANE NICHOLSON NANTUCKET MA 02554 4241 0051 BROWN STILLMAN B 180 FERN STREET 0015 WALSH ST W HARTFORD CT 06119 4241 0052 JACOBS STEPHEN R & SUZANNE C 1625 STOCTON RD 0013 WALSH ST MEADOWBROOK PA 19046 4241 0053 KOPACZ JOHN E $ MARTHA E M 0011 CRANBERRY LN 0012 WILLARD ST NORWELL MA 02061 4241 0055 MURRAY DAVID H JR & KAREN 0 PO BOX 374 0007 4JALSH ST NANTUCKET MA 02554 4241 0056 REIN HARRY T & SUSAN D 0174 TURTLEBACK ROAD 0003 WALSH ST NEW CANAAN CT 06840 4241 0057 HESS WALTER R TR PO BOX 1139 0004 WILLARD ST C/0 WHITE ELEPHANT RESORT NANTUCKET MA 02554 4241 0058 POLLARD GILDA C PO BOX 343 0045 EASTON ST NANTUCKET MA 02554 4241 0059 POLLARD EDMUND T PO BOX 343 0047 ,EASTON ST NANTUCKET MA 02554 4241 0081 FORSTER ALAN M & NANCY ANN C 0011 GODFREY LN 0001 SWAIN ST WESTPORT CT 06880 4241 00824 JAFFE LAURENCE & IMOGENE 4515 DEXTER ST NW 0010 WALSH ST WASHINGTON DC 20007 4241 0083 SHEA FELICE K 32 WASHINGTON SQ W - APT 7E 0008 WALSH ST NEW YORK NY 10011 4241 0084 FAIR WIND PARTNERS 5280 N OCEAN DR - APT 5C 0006 WALSH ST C/0 HOUGHTON ANTHONY J SINGER ISLAND FL 33404-2612 4241 0085 GLIDDEN RICHARD J TR 0037 CENTER ST 0053 EASTON ST 53 EASTON STREET REALTY TR UST NANTUCKET MA 02554 4241 0086 BURTON ROBERT M TR PO BOX 3105 0055 EASTON ST BURTON FAMILY REALTY TRUST NANTUCKET MA 02584 4241 0013 *BATES BRUCE B ETAL TRUSTEES 507 ALLENS CREEK ROAD 0017 WALSH ST WILLARD STREET NOMINEE TRU ST ROCHESTER NY 14618-3405 4241 006C HESS WALTER R TR PO BOX 1139 C060 EASTON ST C/O 41HITE ELEPHANT RESORT NANTUCKET MA 02554 4241 0023 HESS WALTER R TR PO BOX 1139 005D EASTON ST C/0 WHITc ELEPHANT RESORT NANTUCKET MA 02554 4241 0022 LINCOLN BAYARD R TR 0018 CAMBRIDGE ST 0046 EASTON ST LINCOLN FAMILY TRUST CHELMSFORD MA 01824 4241 00532 BROWN STILLMAN B 180 FERN STREET 0014 WILLARD ST W HARTFORD CT 06119 4241 00533 JACOBS STr=PHEN R & SUZANNE 1625 STOCTON RD 0010 WILLARD ST MEADOWBRGOK PA 19046 • CERTIFICATE NO: "~D q '~ ~~ DATE ISSUED: ~ Application to the HISTORIC DISTRICT COMMISSION, Nantucket, Massachusetts, for a CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS for structural work. Incomplete applications will not be reviewed by the HDC. All blanks must be filled in using BLUE OR BLACK INK (no pencil) or marked N/A. 'This is a contractual agreement and must be filled out in ink. An application is hereby made for issuance of a Certificate of Appropriateness under Chapter 395 of the Acts and Resolves of Mass., 1970, for proposed work as described herein and on plans, drawings and photographs accompanying this application and made a part hereof by reference. The certificate is valid for three years from date of issuance. No structure may differ from the approved application. Violation may impede issuance of Certificate of Occupancy. /PROPERTY DESCRIPTION TAX MAP N°: ~ ~ , 1, ~ PARCEL N°. ~- 2» FOR OFFICE USE ONLY o~- Street & Number of Proposed Work J 1-t ~~ ~.~". Date application received: ~ ee Paid: $ ~ Owner of record: - ~~(. ~A~-~ ~~/, ~ RuP~~•~ Must be acted on by: ~ I I Mailing Address: j ~FIE~..~ ~. Extend`eCt't c ~R Approved: ~ is~,p roved: ~ ~ 12a5co~i `~ ~ `75 on island off island Chairman: , Telephone: 2~~ - ~~ ( ) ( ) I hereby authorize the agent named below to act on my behalf to make changes in Member: ~ >'-~-~ - .~,..the specifications or the plans contained in this applic :qh~' rder to bring the ~~ ;'r~" ~____~ application into compliance with the HDC guide ' s. ti:~ Member: - 1 l ` ~ r'-- ~ .. C ~ .. Member: ~---G re o T Mcner of Record AGENTT~ INFORMATION (if applicable) ._ ~~' ~`S ' ~ Name: c,~t~rz~s oc~ft~-,_~ ~ Mailing Address: ~ ~~/it~.. i~--~~7 ~•~. Telephone: 22~ ` G`~6~ (on island) (off island New Dwelling Addition Color Change .Fence .Other (please specify) -_ Size of Structure or Addition: Length: ~` Sq. Footage 1st floor: ~~'. Decks: Size: ~X!~ - _~t floor ._- 2nd floor Width: lg ~ I ~ Sq. footage 2nd floor: Size: __ 1st floor - 2nd floor Sq. footage 3rd floor: Difference between existing grade and proposed finish grade: North ~ South yes East ~ West Height of ridge above final finish grade: North ~ ~r -~~~ South ~~ ~ h ~~ East `(r~~ - ~ r' West I ~~' Io " Additional Remarks '/ REVISIONS` 1. East Elevation Historic Name: \\/.dae ~~-~t ~ (describe) 2. South Elevation Original Date: 3. West Elevation Original Builder: 4. North Elevation Is there an HDC survey form for this building? ^ Yes ^ No 'Cloud on drawings and submit photographs of existing elevations. DETAIL OF WORK TO BE PERFORMED Foundation: Height Exposed ~~~ Block ~_~ Block Parged IJ Brick (type) !'"Poured Concrete ..Piers Masonry Chimney: Block Parged 'Brick (type) ~'o~~~ro~-~ w~ ~~ ~~ _' Other Roof Pitch: Main Mass x/12 Secondary Mass ~ /12 Dormer 'J -/12 Other Roofing material: ~sphalt Manufacturer ~ -`v Fence: Height: Fiberglass Manufacturer Length: _ ~ l Wood (Type: Red Cedar, White Cedar, Shakes, etc.) Type: Skylights (flat only): Manufacturer Model No. Size Location Manufacturer Model No. Size Location Gutters: ~ /Wood (type) 4 K S' ^ Aluminum ^ Copper Leaders (material and size): ~ ~ ~~/onc> Sidewall: /White cedar shingles ^ Clapboard (exposure: inches) Front only l J Other Trim: Lumber type Pine Treatment t/~'aint Dimensions: Redwood -~edar '_~~ Other ~__: Stain-solid r__. Natural to weather ^ Clear oil finish Fascia (x P~ Rake ~ ~'~ Frieze ' Windows: 'Double Hung 'Casement Other True Divided Lights(muntins) Snap-in Grilles ' Doors (type and material): Front Garage Door(s): Type r• Soffit (Overhang) ~~_ Corner boards ~ Door Frame E '~ ~~ Other Rear E~.,7v..j. - l err wc~tiL% Material Side _.;cL;r> ~~.~rt,y 1_ ~..~-~.~ a Landscape materials: Driveways Walkways ~,a_~,-~.~_ Walls. Note: Complete door and window schedules are required. ,. s COLORS Sidewall Clapboard (if applicable) Roof Trim Sash Doors Deck Foundation Fence Shutters ' Attach manufacturer's color samples. Window Casing X` Note: It is strongly recommended that the applicant be familiar with the HDC guidelines, Building with Nantucket in Mind, prior to submittal of application. Please see other _. _ side for submittal requirements. I hereby agree to abide by and comply with the terms and conditions of this application. ~, ~~~ ~ ~' Date Signature of owner of record f ~~.~<`~~~' r Signed under penalties of perjury Member: Notes -Comments -Restrictions - Condit~'ortis ~ ~~ ~~~ ~ DESCRIPTION OF WORK TO BE PERFORMED See reverse for required documentation. Garage Garage/Apartment Commercial Historical Renovation Deck Gate Paving Move Building Demolition 1 Revisions to previous Cert. No Steps Shed IIr _= ~~;i Lt~I ------1 .L I / ~ I ~ '~ ~ II _.. L---- --~-- ~.A~ -- Ii ~\ ~ 1 ~, I ' ' 'l a__ ~, ~ _T _ -. ----- -- ~._.__ r c~ +.r ~ .C ~ ~ ~ O U '~ ~ .C ~ ~ v ~ U ~ ~ ~ ~ U CJ b aj ~ Q ~1 c~ ., C w ~ xo „ ~ ~ c~: ~ ~ C,V c, V' ~ ~ ~ ~ , _ j l~ r 7 . ~ ~+ f .. ` ~~ nn~ L~ ~J D co r ' ~ d. W ~n~ C!~ 1~:~ I «-i I ~I '~ ~! I G ~I ~; ,/ ~ ~ ~ = cf) ; { ~ ~ ; z - -.. - _- -; _. - 2 9 3.58 - _ ~ i.'-- ._ m~ _ -- - 203.55 (Field) (Held ) 90.03(Field)SHeld) ~" - 203.46 - ~ ~~ - ~ ~ - (Rec, ) ,, ... \- 90.00 (Rec.) ~ ~ ~ ~ • ,' ~ ~; 49.0 ~ ~ ~ .~ ~ ~ ~ - 04 ~~ r ~, 3 ~ ~ ,.. 46. ~-> ,~, EASEMENT-,~ 1 ~,~;~ 41.00: , . -,-..I~~ T. _ ~ ~ 10.29 =_-~ .. _.. ~£~7D - 8.8G' i G ~ ~ rn ; ~_ ~ 1 wo ~ f Tory ~ ~- ~!I I/Z sto ~' o. - (`- .0.75 rome ~r'~ rY `~ '' `~ ~' ~~ - - dwellin ~ ~^rood frame, d• _..~, ~ ~ dwelling ' ~: a._ ~ r ~I ~ ~ C i L ~~~ ~ '~, i i ',~.`' ,S ~ ~ 8rS Fbrch ~. I ~ w ~~ ~~3, o - --- ~, ~ o col ' i~ ' z~ ~ 2 M d ~.~ ~ ;,_ ., 51.10 __-- •..`(\ ~ l'T: 36 ~/ ,,, t ~ li ~ ~ r r N ~a.~ N~ . , ; - _5,5..00 - ~}'~~~ o ~ 1 ~ ( --47.10 - , ~(lo:,..Wi~p ~ ,v~ ~ 2 storryy i ~. ~ J ` -, -1 , /~ 59:Op»- ~ ~ j awed fry 1 d' '1 j~ ' g `a~ ~' ~ o ling ~ ... Z ~ ~ ~? ~ 8. F33 ~ ' Iii ~''~~J~ C/) S. OS ~ 1-- ~ .. _ _ -~_~ ,.~ ~` I 8.38 ~L ( r, N ~ story wood ~ L.. I .I/2 ;story ~~ m .__..~ %~ ~~ I ~ ( frame dwe~' ~ wood ' fYnme - - "' ; - ! ~ N i'~ _!3,3e- ~ i dwelling. ~ ~ ---~____ `~ _ ~~._ -.--~ _ ~ ~ ,S 5.79 (Rc~cJ - ~ ~' ;~~ `;,~ S ?g ~ 4?~ 10" ~ _~___ 11 `~l 8 2 ° ~.` 18'.' I ao~ ~ `~,~ ,, ' ~ ` , ...~~ 130.1 ~ W ~ '~ . - ,; 9 . . • ~,~ - _...__ ^•4: --~;--.~ ~_ _..... ._.,. .~ i ~. ~ ~1 ~Y _ry. -111( p w ~ ~~ j; ~ _ •• • ' .. s''ar•c are reminded t ' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~_ ~..,. ,. hat no work ~- ~ ~ ~~ r,_ I o •.~ ._ ... .. ,~~eetticatr~n,~ wit~,~t Irrinr - - ...~ LL Q1 9fi 'N .,-~'~ .:. " ~'; ~ b i ~/ ~ %If f1-f71.`i~~llill- 0 1, Q o ~ ~ ~. .,~Pi1 N ~j 16 i4 ~,V - z ~ ~ i ,i, ' \2-~ 82~ ~"`"" I 128.84 Rec. ~ 5.06 ~ _ ,._ ._~.,....... ~~~ I ~ N 86° IJ ~ 3 I ~~ W .... . , 'i L I, r . `~ S ~ ,, ~~ ,I .. ~ ` ~; nJ Al - ~~~ ~., S~. "' i I~ O ~ . .~' vi'' I ~ .~. ~ $~ - L.IIV DA F9OL~q~~ D ~~ ~ ~ ~ LOT A i ~ ~ I_.C. PI . 180?3 - 8 ~~ ,~ ~ ~~ CST: 4593 C~ _ ~,. ~ ~ -- 9,-3.95. 1 G'. i - I ~ L ,~ 1 1~-_~ ~ ___ _.-__~ -`0.05 ! ~ __" J I ,. 03/26/98 TOWN OF NANTUCKET 14:28:33 OWNER`S MAILING ADDRESS LIST Map Block Lot Owner's/Co-Owner's Name Mailing Address/City State Zip Property Location 0029 0034 *BATES BRUCE B ETAL TRUSTEES 507 ALLENS CREEK RD 0021 WILLARD ST WILLARD STREET NOMINEE TRUST ROCHESTER NY 14618-3405 0029 0028 NANTUCKET CONSERVATION FOUND I PO BOX 13 0039 EASTON ST NANTUCKET MA 02554 0029 0077 LOWE SHERON C ETAL PO BOX 689 0028 HULBERT AV C/0 CRAIG ALEXANDER M JR NANTUCKET MA 02554 PAGE 2 MUAS750 8.5 NUMBER OF RECORDS = 29