Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout039-98TOWN OF NANTUCKET BOARD OF APPEALS NANTUCKET, MASSACHUSETTS 02554 Date: To: Parties Decision of following: in Interest and. Others the BOARD OF APPEALS in Application No.: Owner/Applicant: 039-98 May ~ 19 98 concerned with the the Application of the RICHARD G. COREY, TRUSTEE OF COMMERCIAL WHARF NOMINEE TRUST Enclosed is the Decision of the BOARD OF APPEALS which has this day been filed in the office of the Nantucket Town Clerk. An Appeal from this Decision may be taken pursuant to Section 17 of Chapter 40A, Massachusetts General Laws. Any action appealing the Decision must be brought by filing an complaint in court within TWENTY (20) days after this day's date. Notice of the action with a copy of the complaint and certified copy of the Decision must be given to the Town Clerk so as to be received within such TWENTY (20) days. a acne rman cc: Town Clerk Planning Board Building Commissioner PLEASE NOTE: MOST SPECIAL PERMITS AND VARIANCES HAVE A TIME LIMIT AND WILL EXPIRE IF NOT ACTED-UPON ACCORDING~TO NANTUCKET ZONING BY-LAW §139-30I (SPECIAL PERMITS); §139-32I (VARIANCES) ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE CALL THE NANTUCKET ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS. NANTUCKET ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS 37 Washington Street Nantucket, Massachusetts 02554 1 21 Commercial Wharf Assessor's Map 42.2.4 Land shown on Land Court Plan 27017-A Parcel 6 Certificate of Title No. 18107 Residential-Commercial DECISION: 1. At a public hearing of the Nantucket Zoning Board of Appeals, on Friday, April 10, 1998, at 1:00 P.M., in the Conference Room, in the Town Annex Building, 37 Washington Street, Nantucket, Massachusetts, the Board made the following decision on the application of RICHARD G. COREY, TRUSTEE OF COMMERCIAL WHARF NOMINEE TRUST, c/o Reade & Alger Professional Corporation, Post Office Box 2669, Nantucket, Massachusetts 02584, File No. 039-98: 2. The applicant is seeking a SPECIAL PERMIT under Nantucket Zoning By-law §139-33.A(4) and {5)(alteration or expansion of a pre-existing nonconforming structure or use). The applicant proposes to alter the existing single-family dwelling upon the subject property (the "Locus") by adding an enclosed foyer, an unenclosed stoop and storage area on the northerly side of the structure fronting on Commercial Wharf; by adding a mudroom/pantry and unenclosed stoop on the westerly side of the structure, to be sited 3.1± feet from the wes_te~ly lot line but not closer to that side lot line than the existing structure; and by increasing the size of a first-story deck extending over Nantucket Harbor on the south side of the structure, and adding a second-story deck over the expanded first-story deck. The existing rear first-story deck is sited at zero setback from the southerly (or rear) lot line, with the new decks also being sited with zero setback from that lot line. Current ground cover is 846± square feet (for a ratio of 65fo), with the new proposed ground cover being 950± square feet (for a ratio of 73±%). The Locus is nonconforming as to lot area, having an area of 1294± square feet in a district in which minimum lot area is 5,000 square feet; as to ground cover, having a ratio of 65±% in a district where a maximum of 30a is allowed for lots smaller in area than 5,000 square feet; as to side and rear side yard setbacks, with the structure being sited 3.1± feet at the closest point from the westerly side lot line, 0.1± feet at the closest point from the easterly side lot line, and with zero setback at the closest point from the rear (southerly) lot line, in a district that requires minimum side and rear yard setback of five feet; and as to parking, with one parking space being required for the single-family dwelling upon the Locus, and no conforming parking space being provided (the parking space now provided being situated only partially within the Locus, and partly within the roadway layout of Commercial Wharf). See Board of Appeals File No. 032-73. In addition, or in the alternative, the applicant is seeking relief by VARIANCE pursuant to Nantucket Zoning By-law §139-32.A from the Intensity Regulations of §139- 32.A to validate the structure as currently sited and to allow construction of the project as proposed. The Applicant is also seeking relief by SPECIAL PERMIT under Nantucket Zoning By-law 139-18.B(2) and (3) (Parking Requirements) to waive the one required parking space. The Locus is situated at 21 COMMERCIAL WHARF, Assessor's Map 42.2.4, Parcel 6, shown on Land Court Plan 27017-A, and is zoned RESIDENTIAL-COMMERCIAL.` 3. Our decision is based upon the application and accompanying materials, and representations and testimony received at our public hearing. The Planning Board made a favorable recommendation upon the proposed alterations to the dwelling, but an unfavorable recommendation as to the proposed changes and additions to the decks over Nantucket Harbor. An abutter appeared at the public hearing, expressing concern as to the proposed decks, but no opposition to the changes to the dwelling provided that there be no extension of the decks; no other concerns were presented at the public hearing. 4. The single-family dwelling upon the Locus was constructed by a former owner in 1973, pursuant to a validly- issued building permit; a Certificate of Occupancy was issued for this dwelling in 1975. A Special Permit issued by the Board of Appeals in File No. 032-73 on December 19, 1973, purported to allow building upon the Locus with ground cover of 838 square feet; however, the lot area and calculations in that decision are faulty, the purported basis for the entry of the decision is not supported by a review of the by-law as then in effect , and the decision was made by two members of the then three-member board, and applicable law then, as now, required the favorable vote of at~ least three members where the board is composed of only three members. At the time of construction,, the applicable maximum ground cover ratio was 50o under the by-law as then in effect, and there were no side or rear yard setback requirements. The existing dwelling is therefore in a pre-existing, nonconforming status as to side and rear yard setbacks, and further has the benefit of protection against enforcement of dimensional zoning requirements by virtue of its having been in existence for more than ten years (and more than six years, having been erected pursuant to a validly-issued building permit) pursuant to M.G.L., c. 40A, §7, and Nantucket Zoning By-law §139-25.C. As per the site plan presented with the application and attached hereto as Exhibit A, and a letter from Leo C. Asadoorian, P.L.S., of Blackwell & Associates, Inc., attached hereto as Exhibit B, the correct calculation of the ground cover ratio at the time of construction in 1973 was 1,014 square feet, for a ratio of 78±%; at that time, all porches, enclosed or unenclosed, and other areas under overhangs of the structure, were included in ground cover. Based upon the present exclusion of unenclosed porches 2 from the definition of ground cover, the ground cover of the structure as it now exists is calculated at 846 square feet, for a ratio of 65±0, with the proposed ground cover to be 950± square feet, for a ratio of 73±%, as set forth in the Asadoorian letter. Subsequent to construction of the dwelling, the By-law was amended to provide for a maximum ground cover of 30% of lot area for all lots, including the Locus, having lot area of less than 5,000 square feet. Accordingly, the applicant noted in his presentation that the proposed ground cover ratio would be less than the ground cover ratio for the existing structure at the time of construction, as calculated under the respective provisions of the By-law as in effect now and then, respectively. The applicant presented, as justification for the proposed changes affecting ground cover, the fact that these changes will enable the applicant to correct the condition of interior stairs, which do not now comply with Building Code requirements and will be brought into compliance. 5. The Board of Appeals took no action upon the portion of the application which requested relief for addition to the first story deck and addition of a second story deck, each connected to the structure upon the Locus and extending over Nantucket Harbor, on the basis that the Board had no jurisdiction over these decks since they would be outside the Locus and upon land of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts in Nantucket Harbor. 6. Accordingly, by a vote of four members(Waine, Williams, O'Mara and Toole) in favor and one (Sevrens) in opposition, the Board of Appeals GRANTED relief by SPECIAL PERMIT under Nantucket Zoning By-law §139-33.A(4) and (5), to allow the proposed changes, excluding the alterations and additions to decks extending over Nantucket Harbor, and to waive the one parking space required for the single-family dwelling now existing upon the Locus as is required under By-law §139-18.A(1) because the structure is being enlarged, finding that the existing dwelling is a pre-existing, nonconforming structure with respect to the side and rear yard setback requirements of the Nantucket Zoning By-law, that the proposed alterations to the dwelling will not be substantially more detrimental to the neighborhood than the existing nonconformities, that the granting of parking relief is in harmony with the general purpose and intent of the Zoning By- law, and that compliance with the parking requirements of §139-18 would be physically impossible for the applicant to provide, subject to the following conditions: (a) The alterations shall be constructed in substantial conformity to the plans submitted to the Nantucket Historic District Commission and approved under Certificate of Appropriateness No. 31875. (b) The structure upon the Locus, as altered, shall be no closer to any lot line than the structure now is. 3 as the (c) The ground cover of altered, shall not exceed 950 Nantucket Zoning By-law as r Dated: May ~ 1998 f:\wp\corey\coreyzbadec.doc RECE11/EC TOWN CLERK'S OFFICE NANTIIf',G(~T, nen +2554 MAY d 6 1998 TIME:_~___.__ CLERK:_ 4 the structure upon the Locus, square feet, as measured under TOWN OF NANTUCKET ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS 37 WASHINGTON STREET NANTUCKET, MASSACHUSETTS 02554 PHONE 508-228-7215 FAX 508-228-7205 NOTICE PLEASE BE ADVISED: AS THE MEETING IS SCHEDULED ON GOOD FRIDAY/PASSOVER, SHOIILD YOII HAVE RELIGIOIIS CONSTRAINTS PROHIBITING ATTENDANCE, PLEASE CALL THE OFFICE ASAP AND-EVERY EFFORT WILL BE MADE TO ACCOMMODATE YOII A Public Hearing of the NANTUCKET BOARD OF APPEALS will be held at 1:00 P.M., FRIDAY, APRIL 10, 1998, in the CONFERENCE ROOM, TOWN ANNEX BUILDING, 37 WASHINGTON STREET, Nantucket, Massachusetts, on the Application of the following: RICHARD G. COREY, TRUSTEE OF COMMERCIAL WHARF NOMINEE TRUST BOARD OF APPEALS FILE N0. 039-98 Applicant is seeking a SPECIAL PERMIT under Nantucket Zoning By-Law §139-33A (4) and (5) (alteration/expansion of a pre-existing non-conforming structure/use). Applicant proposes to alter the existing single-family dwelling by adding an enclosed foyer, an unenclosed stoop and storage area onto the northerly side of the structure that fronts on Commercial Wharf; by adding a mudroom/pantry and unenclosed stoop onto the westerly side of the structure that will be sited 3.1+ feet from that side yard lot line but will come no closer to that lot line than the existing structure; and by increasing the size of a first-story deck extending-over Nantucket Harbor on the south, and adding a second-story deck over the expanded first-story deck. The existing rear first-story deck is sited at zero feet from that lot line with the new decks also being sited at zero feet. Current ground cover is 846+ square feet, (65±%), with the new ground cover being 950+ square feet, (73+%). The Locus is non-conforming as to lot size, having an area of 1294+ square feet in a district that requires a minimum of 5,000 square feet; as to ground cover having a ratio of 65+% in a district that allows a maximum ratio of 30% for undersized lots; as to side and rear yard setbacks, with the structure being sited 3.1+ feet at its closest point from the westerly side yard lot line and 0.1+ feet at its closest point from the easterly side yard lot line and zero feet at its closest point from the southerly rear yard lot line in a district that requires a minimum side and rear yard setback of five (5) feet; and as to parking, with the one (1) required parking space not situated entirely on the Locus. See BOA File No. 032-73. In addition, or in the alternative, Applicant is seeking relief by VARIANCE pursuant to Nantucket Zoning By-Law §139-32A from the Intensity Regulations of §139-16A to validate the structure as currently sited and to allow completion of the project as proposed. Applicant is also seeking relief by SPECIAL PERMIT under Nantucket Zoning By-Law §139-18B(2) and (3) (Parking Requirements) to waive the one (1) required parking space. The Premises is located at 21 COMMERCIAL WHARF, Assessor's Map 42.2.4, Parcel 6, Land Court Plan 27017-A. The property is zoned ~ Residential-Commercial . 1~ n ( ~ ~ ^ ~~', ~~G~-~C lXJ /~J Dale W. Waine, Lf~a~xman BOA Form 1-89 NANTUCKET ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS 37 WASHINGTON STREET March 4, 1998 NANTUCKET, MASSACHUSETTS 02554 CASE No. ~- APPLICATION FOR RELIEF Owner's name(s): Richard G. Corey, as Trustee of Commercial Wharf Nominee Trust Mailing address: c/o Reade & Alaer Professional Corporation, 6 Youna's Way P O. Box 2669 Nantucket, Massachusetts 02554 Applicant's name: Same Mailing address: Same Location of lot: Assessor's map and parcel number 42.2.4-6 Street address: 21 Commercial Wharf n^^~~~~'•• Land Ct Plan, ~-lar °n-~~~~-ar "~ ° ~'~-° 27017-A Lot Date lot acquired: 10/31/97 Cert. No. 18107 Zoning district R-C Uses on lot - commercial: None _ or _ MCD? s - number of: dwellings 1 duplex _ apartments _ rental rooms Building date(s): all pre-8/72? _ or 1973 C of O? Yes Building Permit appl'n Nos. 446 Case Nos. all BoA applications, lawsuits: 032-73 State fully all zoning relief sought and respective Code sections and subsections, specifically what you propose compared to present and what grounds you urge for BoA to make each finding per Section 139-32A x if Variance, 139-30A x if a Special Permit (and 139-33A x if to alter or extend a nonconforming use). If appeal per 139-31A & B _, attach decision or orders appealed. OK to attach addendum2 See attached addendum. Items enclosed as part of this Application: orders _ addendum2 Locus map x Site plan x showing present x + planned x structures Floor plans present x proposed x elevations x(HDC approved? Pending) Listing lot area _ frontage _ setbacks _ GCR _ parking data s Assessor-certified addressee list 4 sets x mailing labels 2 sets _ $200 fee payable to Town of Nantucket x proof3 'cap' covenant _ 1(If an appeal, ask Town Clerk to send Bldg Comr's record to BOA.) I certify that the requested information submitted is substantially complete and true to the best of my knowledge, under the pains and penalties of perj,~ry. SIGNATURE: /,I~i~~E~ `• ~~~~~~(/,• (~_ Applicant _ Attorney/agent x 3(If not owner or owner's attorney, enclose proof of authority) FOR BoA OFFICE USE Application copies rec' d: 4 1/ or for BoA/on ~ ~ / ~~ by ~~~ One copy filed with Town Clerk on ~!'~/~0 by complete? ~ One copy each to Planning Bd and Building Dept /1 /~ by ~~ $200 fee check given T wn Tre~a/~urer on by-~,,~ vwwaived? --~ Hearing notice posted ~/~~J`~a mailed ~~/ I & M ~/~/ ~~ ~/7~/ Hearing (s ) on _/_/_ cont' d to _/_/_, _/_/_ withdrawn? _/_/_ Decision due by _/_/_ made _/_/_ filed TC _/_/_ mailed _/_/_ See related cases lawsuits other f:\wp\corey\coreyzbaapp.doc ~tE~E1~0EC? TOWN CLERK'S OFFICE NANTIJC~!~T ~!~A 02554 MAR 2 4 1998 TME: ~~,n ~~' ~y~ CLERK:___ ~~ '~ ADDENDUM TO APPLICATION OF RICHARD G. COREY, TRUSTEE OF 21 COMMERCIAL WHARF NOMINEE TRUST This application is a request for relief to alter a nonconforming single-family dwelling at 21 Commercial Wharf (the "Locus"), which was constructed in 1973 by its former owner pursuant to a validly-issued building permit; a Certificate of Occupancy was issued in 1975. The existing dwelling is nonconforming as to side and rear yard setback, being at its closest point zero feet from the easterly side line, zero feet from the southerly rear line, and 3.1 feet from the westerly side line. Side and rear yard setback is 5 feet in this zoning district. In addition, the current ground cover ratio is about 846 square feet, or 65±0, measured under the present zoning by-law definitions; at the time the structure was built, ground cover as measured under definitions then in effect was about 1,014 square feet, or 78±0. The Locus, a pre-existing lot of record, is nonconforming as to lot A Special Permit issued by the Board of Appeals in File No. 032-73 on December 19, 1973, purported to allow building upon the lot with ground cover of 838 square feet; however, the lot area and calculations in that decision are faulty. At the time of construction, the applicable maximum ground cover ratio was 700 under the by-law as then in effect. The applicant wishes to alter the structure by doing the following work, as shown upon the plans attache d, hereto: 1. Altering areas under the existing roof, by adding an enclosed foyer, an enclosed mudroom/pantry, and unenclosed stoops. These will affect ground cover as set forth below; in addition, work will be performed and the building will be changed within the side yard setback area. 2. Adding an enclosed storage area. This will affect ground cover, but will meet applicable setbacks. 3. Increasing the size of a first-story deck extending over Nantucket Harbor, and adding a second-story deck over the expanded first-story deck. This will be performed at the perimeter of the Locus, which is already constructed up to the edge of the stone pier at Nantucket Harbor. There will be no effect upon ground cover, as decks are excluded from its calculation. According to the attached calculations by Blackwell & Associates, Inc., the effect of these changes will be to increase ground cover to about 950 square feet (73±0), an increase from the presently-calculated 65±o but less than the 78±% calculated under the rules in effect when the structure was constructed. The existing nonconforming dwelling was constructed more than ten years ago, and accordingly is exempt from enforcement as to its zoning nonconformities and any noncompliance with the 1973 special permit. Under case law, the applicant is therefore entitled to request a special permit for its alteration under Nantucket Zoning By-law X139-33.A(4), on the basis of a finding that the alteration will not be substantially more detrimental to the neighborhood than the existing nonconformity. In addition, X139-33.A(5) permits the Board of Appeals to issue a special permit for the extension of an existing structure which violates a setback distance, making no requirement that such a structure be pre-existing of the zoning requirements with which it does not conform. Accordingly, the applicant requests that the Board of Appeals find that the proposed alterations will not be substantially more detrimental to the neighborhood than the existing nonconformity, and grant a special permit for the proposed work under both §139-33.A(4) and (5). In addition, the applicant requests a variance from the setback and ground cover requirements of the by-law to validate the present siting of the structure, and, if required, to approve the proposed work. ~ ~~~ ~~ h3~ f:\wp\corey\coreyzbaadd.doc ~-~-~ ~- ~..___.__ _ ~~ _. ~~~-.~ ~ r ~~ , ~~ . _____ BLACKWELL ~ ASSOCIATES INC. PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYORS 6 YOUNG'S WAY NANTUCKET. MA 02554 B-4967 (508) 228-9026 March 4, 1998 Attorney Arthur I. Reade, Jr. Reade & Alger, P.C. Six Young's Way Nantucket, Massachusetts 02554 Re: Richard G. Corey (Map 42.2.4-006) Board of Appeals Application L.C. PL. 27017-A, #21 Commercial Wharf Dear Arthur: Enclosed for your use is our Plot Plan to accompany Board of Appeals Application. After additional review in the field, a discussion with Building Department personnel and several conversations with Mr. Mark Poor, I can offer the following determination as to existing and proposed ground cover areas. * G C P (c~ Time Building~Permit Was Issued (January 1, 1973 /Permit No. 466) 1,014 sf ± or 78% ± (Note: Does not include decks that overhang Nantucket Harbor and therefore are not on/over subject parcel). * Currently Existing G.C.P. (March 1998) 846 sf ± or 65% ± * Proposed G.C.P. 950 sf ± or 73% ± (Reference to: Proposed Additions to Corey Residence by M.W.P. Residential Design; dated: 12-27-97) I trust the above data will assist you in your application to the Nantucket Zoning Board of Appeals. Please do not hesitate to call if you have any additional questions. Sincerely, CMG C'~~;~ Leo C. Asadoorian, PLS w/Enclosures CC: Mark W. Poor, MWP Designs ZONIIV6 CtASSIFICATI0IV: RC EXISP,NG MIN. AREA:...... 5000 S;F., , 1294fS.f: MIN. FRONTAGE:..... ,4Q ,f7:, , $E~, PLAtJ , FRONT YARD S.B.:.... NQN~ . $F,E. PLAN . REAR do SIDE S.B.:.... J` . F.T. , $FE, PLAN . GROUND COVER (7):.. , ,5,Or, COPlCRETE BOUND FND ~ SURVEY h1ARKER FND O DENOTES 12" DIA PILE ONLY ORIGINALLY STAMPED AND ENDORSED COPIES OF THIS PLAN SHALL BE ACKNOWLEDGED BY THE CERTIFYING LAND SURVEYOR. L A I c 0 c 42.2.4-3 n/f WALTER R. HESS TR. _,._ _.- - - --"- - 42.2.4-5 ~ n/f H.B. & MARY P. WALKER \ N' ~ 4t < _k C.. I.~~~Gf . .. nrnnrmrrruFT T~ARBOR ORIGINAL SIGNED AND STAMPED COPIES OF THIS PLAN MAY BE PHOTOCOPIED BY THE BOARD OF APPEALS OR THE NANTUCKET COUNTY REGISTRY OF DEEDS FOR RECORDING PURPOSES. IN CASES OF DISCREPANCIES REGARDING INFORMAT1oN CONTAINED HEREON AND UNAUTHORIZED PHOTOCOPIES OF THIS PLAN, ONLY ORIGINALLY STAMPED AND ENDORSEDED COPIES SHALL BE ACKNOWLEDGED BY THE CERTIFYING LAND SURVEYOR. THIS PLOT PLAN WAS PREPARED To ACCOMPANY AN APPLICATION TO THE NANTUCKET BOARD OF APPEALS AND IS NOT TO BE CONSIDERED A FULL fNSTRUMENT SURVEY. THIS PLAN SHOULD NOT BE USED TO ESTABLISH PaOp~g~~~ FENCES, HEDGES OR ANY ANCILLARY STRUCTURES ON THE PREMISES. THE PROPERTY LINES SHOWN R~..Y ON CURREM' DEEDS A,`ID PANS OF RECORD. TIiIS PLOT PLAN IS NOT A CERTIf1CATi0N AS TO TO T'r1E TITLE OR OWNERSHIP OF THE PROPERTY SHOWN. OWNERS OF ADJOINING PROPERTIES ARE SHOWN ACCORDING TO CURRENT TOWN OF NANTUCKET ASSESSOR RECORDS. THIS PLAN MAY NOT BE USED FOR ANY OTHER PURPOSE TN~r~N ITS INTENDED USE NOTED ABOVE. ©Blockwelt do Associates Inc. f=ETiC 3' Plot Plan to Accompany Board of A~eals Alrplicattion tin Nantucket, Massachusetts SCALE: 1 "= 10' DATE: MARCH 3, 1998 Owner: RICHARD. G. COREYi TRUSTEE. OF , , 21, COMMERICAL WHARF NOMINEE.TRUST . Deed/Cert.: , C• ,18107 , Plan: LC.C. 27017-A Tax Map: 4?.2; 4-6 . Locus: . #21 COMMERCIAL ,WHARF BLAL'K~lsLL ~ ASSOCIATES, Inc. FYOf83S1<0ltQ~ Lend SWVet/01's 6 Young's 1Pay .l~a~ztucket, Massachusetts 02554 Q7o/120 (50S) 228-9026 B-4967 zo~iws c~~ssi~cAnoN: Rc MIN, AREA: , , , , , , 5000 S ;F MIN. FRONTAGE:..... 4O .FT . FRONT YARD S.B.:.... NQN~ . REAR do SIDE 5.6.:.... ~ . FT, GROUND COVER (z):..: ,S,Or, IXIS1ING: ~294fS.F. $E,E. ~~ . . $E,L, PLAFv . r~;E. N4~:f . ® CONCRETE BOUND FND ~ SURVEY FAARKER f~VD ~> DtNtJTES 1?" U~Ar'(? ~~ ONLY ORIGINALLY STAMPED AND rNf10R<<E; COFIF~S OF THIS PLAN SHkL!. 3F_ ACKtdOWLEDGED BY THY CER11FY1NG LAND SURVEYOR. 42.2.4-3 n/f _ WALTER R. HESS TR. _ ___._ _--- -' ~`- --._--- 1~,~.~ ~ ~•••' . ~. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . k ... GRAVEL DRNE .. ~ . ~ . I~. •. ~. ~. ~.... ...... . ......... ........ 3.1'f ••~•••~ ~'.~.~'. WAY ~,~, ~ ~' N/IDE o~ ~i 1.7'f 42.2.4-5 n/f H.B. do MARY P. iNAUCER NANTUCKET HARBOR ~C1G°~ U G/~C~C~' T0: 80.STON SAFE DEPOSfT AND TRUST COMPAPa'Y ~l1V~p~~~~`~luV Q~~u'~1 ...................AND NO OTHERS. OGi) 1 CERTIFY, TO '(HE BEST DF MY KNOWLEDGE, THAT TTiE ~, ,/~!~~i~Nl~~~. ~ ;j n ~ ~~~~ PRF~~!ISFS SF!Ct~'~'rJ ARr !_OG~TFO tN Ft nnD ua~cRn ?OBE: ..V8 .. , DELItJEATED ON F.i.R.M. /COMMUNITY PANEL ~C~1LE. 1 r= 10' DATt: SEQZ ~ME1ER 25, 189? NUMBER: 25020•-00 ...11D .. , BY THE FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY. EF-FECTNE DA1E OF n ROBERT I_ FiAli MAPS: JUNE 3, 1986 AND AS PERIODICALLY REVISED. •- wner: . THIS 1NSPECTION PLAN WAS PREPARED FOR MORTGAGE PURPOSES ONLY AND IS NOT 70 BE CONSIDERED A FULL INSTRUMENT SURVEY. Deed~Cert,: ~• , 6549. Plan: ~-•C.C. 27017-A THIS PLAN SHOUID NOT SE USED TO ESTABLJSH PROPERTY LINES. FENCES, HEDGES OR ANY ANCILLARY STRUCTURES ON THE PREMISES. 42.24-b 21 COMMERCIAL WHARF THE PROPERTY LINES SHOWN RELY ON CURRENT DEEDS AND PLANS TQx Map: LOCUS: .i~ . OF RECORD. THIS INSPECTION PLAN IS NOT A CERTiFlCAT10N AS TO THE TITLE OR B~C~~~ ~ ~SS`OCIAT~'S, Inr. OWNERSHIP OF THE PROPERTY SHOWN. OWNERS OF ADJOINING PROPERTIES ARE SHOWN ACCORDING TO CURRENT TOWN OF NANiUCKEC ASSESSOR PPOfBSSiDfi~ ZlpEd Surs~eyors TH SOPLAN SHALL NOT BE USED FOR ANY OTHER PURPOSE OTHER THAW B ~03176g~ S lay rrs INTENDED USE STATED ABOVE NantuCketj ~uss~,chltsetts 02554 nBlackweq ac Associates Inc. NOT TO BE RECORDED FBK.: B70/120 (508) ~~-9026 B-4967. `Y ill ~Jl ~ ~/fL ~ L1 `~ \`` /~\ \~ aann'' ~i ~ OLD /TONE' •IER ~fL ~ ~ ®~ 1 I \ ~ ~. ~iL ~~~ -/ / / ' / ~ i ~ i i / ~ i ~ / ~ i ~ / ~ / ~ ~ / / / Yv ono souTN rNwR~• 2 ~ ' ~A i ' E" / / EAg£M 6 ~_,/ ~ ~ ~ ~ ,,- , A .~ (AAVVt H I ~ \ ` U ` ` ~~ STDNE v1ER Y~ ~`` ~ J ~ (OE SYROYED 1 ' i i i i i i ' 11 ~ . ' / ~ i ~+ ~' ~ A I t ~ 'Ri ~ ' ` •r 3 ' •/ ~ ~ ~ IAA\I\ 12.3.1-37 / ~ r~~O~ '~ 1 • Op ii 3 Z ~' y t , i~ ~i~ s ~Li ~' ~ Vipy ~ ~ W W EPg~~'`M /~~~ I ~ ~ w ;3 F~ A ~ Y ~ ~ ~ ~ ~.~ ~ 9\ 10 L~ ~ i \ / \~ ~ ~ •~ O O O 6.3.1 - S/ R. w 12.3.:-u REVISIONS LEGEND r1lllE~ r11~~~ pw1E MRCEI Dnit -wRCEI pwlE MRCEI ~I I III IIC ~1~ INFORMATION SHOWN HEREON WAS obplulruac COMPILED FROM AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHS. DEEDS. ^ fy ° AND PLANS OF RKORD AND IS NOT TO BE ~V4 T( 1~~ V a / o CONSTRUED AS HAVING SUFFIC IENi ACCUR- ~~~ ACY fOR CONVEYANCE. - - o ~~~ BoA Form 2-89 NANTUCKET ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS TOWN_AND COUNTY BUILDING NANTUCKET, MA 02554 ASSESSORS LIST OF PARTIES IN INTEREST PROPERTY OWNER: n APPLICANT FOR RELIEF (SAME? ) R~--~-j ~ t~t~ ADDRESS OF PROPERTY: ~t (~Mmes~~~. ~~ ASSESSORS MAP & PARCEL: ~~ . 2, y - ~UDC.e LIST OF PARTIES INCLUDING ADDRESSES*(OR SEE ATTACHED I certify that the foregoing (or the attached-) lists all persons natural or legal, who are owners of abutting property owners of land directly opposite cn any public or private street or way; and abutters of the acutters and all other land owners within three hundred feet of the property line of Owner's property, as they ( and their address) appear on the most recent applicable tax list {per M.G.L. c. 40A, Section 11 Zoning Code Chapter 139, Section 139-29D (2)}. ~" ~f i~R ~ Date P.ssessors Office Town of Nantucket *NOTE: Applicant (petitioner) should include with the lot for which zoning relief is sought, any com-~only-owned abutting lots which might beco^;e involved ire the zoning matter. List r.:ap and parcels fer each abutt°r• • 01/20/98 TOWN OF NANTUCKET 11:38:02 OWNER'S MAILING ADDRESS LIST Map Block Lot Owner's/Co-Owner's Name Mailing Address/City State Zip Pr operty Location 4224 0011 NANTUCKET ELECTRIC CO PO BOX 470 0012 NEW WHALE ST WESTBOROUGH MA 01581 4224 0012 NANTUCKET ELECTRIC COMPANY PO 80X 470 0009 NEW WHALE ST WEST80ROUGH MA 01581 4224 0014 SHERBURNE ASSOCIATES PO BOX 359 OC11 NEW WHALE ST NANTUCKET MA 02554 4224 0003 HESS WALTER R TR PO EOX 1139 0029 COMMERCIAL 4!= C/0 WHITE ELEPHANT RESOR7 NANTUCKET MA 02554 4224 0004 BARNEY WILLIAM H III & RUTH M 0306 GRANT ST 0025 COMMERCIAL WF TROY OH 45373 4224 0005 WALKER H B & MARY P 0005 FAIR ST 00[3 COMMERCIAL WF NANTUCKET MA G2554 4224 0007 WALKER DAVID E 0032 LEDGEVIEW DR 0017 COMMERCIAL WF ASSONET MA 02702 4224 0008 WALKER DAVID BROOKS 32 LEDGEVIEW DR 0000 NEW WHALE ST ASSONET MA 02702 4224 0009 ROWLAND MILTON & ROBERTA 0015 DEER RUN RO G015 COMMERCIAL WF NANTUCKET MA 02554 4224 0010 GATTO MARY CATHERINE 13 COMMERCIAL WHARF 0013 COMMERCIAL kf NANTUCKET MA 02554 4231 0037 NANTUCKET ELECTRIC COMPANY PO BOX 470 0010 NEW WHALE ST WESTBOROUGH MA 01581 4231 0038 HESS WALTER R TR PO BOX 1139 0003 COMMERCIAL ST C/0 WHITE ELEPHANT RESORT NANTUCKET MA 02554 4232 0022 HESS WALTER R TR PO BOX 1139 Q024 WASHINGTON ST C/0 WHITE ELEPHANT RESORT NANTUCKET MA 02554 4232 0023 PARDI RICHARD J & ELIZABETH 0026 WASHINGTON ST 0026 WASHINGTON ST NANTUCKET MA 02554 4232 00231 MARIA MITCHELL ASSOCIATION 0002 VESTAL ST 0028 WASHINGTON ST NANTUCKET MA 02554 NUMBER OF RECORDS = 15 PAGE 1 MUAS750 8.5 V8SZ0 bW '13NOf11NVN ~ Q9£E X08 'O'd ~ £ l69 '8ZZ '80S / MOOd 'M )i2JV W ~ ICI ~ I S ~ Q 7 b .L I 1'ac~ ~ /~ ~~^~ G/ ~ mow}-1lu'~ '1'd I ~I~,W 3~J a~ I '7 ~ t ~ ~T`i~l i~'~ J,~ O ~ D'84Z0 VW '13N0(11NVN ~ E9EE XOB 'O'd ~ E L69 '8ZZ '804 ~ a00d 'M )lalf W ~ __...~.__ ICI J I S ~ Q -. _ _. _ .. ii i _.~_ ~_ __~, _~. G7.O_ _~-- b6sZ0 r/W '13N~f11NVN ~ E9£E X09 'O'd ~ E X69 '8ZZ '904 ~ 2lOOd 'M )iZIt/W ^ I~I J I S ~ Q -~ d i I ~~~ ~ ; ~~ I ~~~~~ - ,~~~rim ~Q~~~+~wwp~ ~z-. ~~~ ~a I~~ ~~ ~o~ VB5Z0 VW '13HOf11NVN ~ £9££ XOH 'O'd ~ £ l69 '8ZZ '808 ~ LOOd 'M )1?ItlW / ICI ~ I S ~ Q -~ ~ 1 1 ~~~ ~ ~~~~ ^ ~~ .~'~ v'H m ,'14'I ~~I~ W 1~J~ ~~ .. V84Z0 dW '13NOf11NdN / E9££ X08 'O'd /E~69'9ZZ'90S/s100d'MHZIVW/ l~I ~ I S 3 Q ~1011~'__ ._._.. 1 _ ~' ~7 b .L I ~; ~~ ~ -~-- ~~ ~ -~~ -' t t(1 ~ ~ '~ ; -' - - ;- , ~ ~ ;, , i ~, ~~ I ~ as ~ - ~~ ', ~~ _~ u ~- r- ~- s t= ~~ ~~ s `~ ~. C ~~]~G; \-~ YBSZO dW '13>IOf11NdN ~ E9EE X08 'O'd ~£L69'8ZZ'804~?100d'M~?JVW~ 11~ t ~ ~ ~ ~r„ _ - - v/ N J I S~ Q ~. 7 d ..L I ~ ~.~.~t~r:rn ~~~~Z~~.W h[~-2---1.~- r ;, .. 'e ~t ;~ V8SZ0 dW ~13N0f11NVN ~ E9EE X08 'O'd ~ E ~ 69 '8ZZ '80S ~ 2lOOd 'M H2! V W ~ ICI ~ I S ~ Q ~is~1d ~~-~;r~.~ ~.~ i.~ ,. ~ ~ n~ ~~ ' ' ^I d ~ 1; ;~ 3Q I ?~ ... ~ ' Y 1~~l~~w WD~ Hm .~~~ 12 V . `` V n h ~ C8GZ0 dW '13)17f11NVN ~ £9££ X08 'O'd ~E~69'8ZZ'80~i~a00d'MH21VW~ I~ J I S ~ Q _ ~ ~, ~ ~ ~ ~ ,1 y + - .,~'~}-11~ ~ ice! ~ 1~ 1~1 d~ I Z ,,, ~~Q~ _ ~~al~.vn~~ ,111n ~~'~ __ _ ~~ 1~;H 1x1 ~i q' I ~~ ~ lam! l~l d ~ I ZIP ~~ ~a 15~ ~I .a,~~ic?~_ ., ~; 0 ~~~ivl1~"1 ~ ~.~..~ - n~ . ~~t ~-iM 'rs~~~~ L~ 1~10~ _. ~ Z- - - -- - '~~ T-1 ~G1 I ~~?.~ ~~'~a~- -- .~+r~t-inn -~d~~r~~ w v~,~ ~ ~ - ~ ~ 1-1-~ Cl ~a'~ ?~ J.~ ZI4 ~~inut~~~~ .: ,y~ I n~_ :y~~ ~~ ~ 6ui~o uaor ~ 1 9ZG0/ 'oN ',7'7 h {-OOt~I ~~o~~saM ~Cr~~o ~ 00 ti, I ~3.OU,6S °E' S eo " _OZS - f~ 8-B -fS • ~,,, ~noJ ao} aaaui6u3 'uosuapud 7N ;j y~u~ ue o~ /aa~ p z ue~d s,~y; ~o a~eos s96/ 6Z 'Jl7b'--- 00%~.~0 NO/1 d~l1S/9.~t! ONt~7e., ~, y9 ~L 0 / ue/duo :{~ed~~o ~fdo,~ ~~ ~~ l1~ N '(1 ~~ ~~, ~~. .~ fd ;o x. i'II i' 4 Ili b III, o8s8 ~~ •~ ~. ~ ~ ~ Q ~, J ~ o ~ I o, ~~j ~ ~1~ ~ ~ 0 ~ ~1 ~' !y O C ( O ~\ N N y ( y 0~ .•. ~ ~ a~ I ~ o ' ~ ~ ~ ~ ti,_ I ~ ~ ~D i ~, ~ ~ ~,, i ~, I~ a ~ ,e., ,,- +sssz -_ \ I ~ , ~~.~o,ES ,s N~ ~ L, I 1 ' of ~ i ~ ( `~ ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ / 09%I r~ I i' % o ~~ al i~ i i ~ i ~ ~ I i ~ I Iry ~~ ~ w ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~,~ ~ ~ __ i ~ ~~ _ ~ I w ~'' ,~., ti, _ I of S ~ `~ i I ~oo~oi ~ I ° ~~ ,~ g ° 9 , (,~ 6 ~. •yD 0 Z Z fr ~ a ~ o ~S ' u,S~ 7d~~~~~/VINO N ° ~ ~I z 1 S No1JNl HS b'M 3 yL/OLZ ~~61 `ZT ~sn~ny °,z~~u~ ~~~a.z.z~g °S us~sor s~xonsNdu ~rz an~d~ ao nt~~a ,._ . ,I ~ ! .V Y 1 S6LSi6-SS`6•hIE '2•Q•7~'I wlo~