Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout033-98TOWN OF NANTUCKET BOARD OF APPEALS NANTUCKET, MASSAC~ItiTSETTS 02554 Date: May ~ 1998' TO: Parties in Interest and. Others concerned with the Decision of the BOARD OF APPEALS in the Application of the following: Application No.; 033-9$ Owner/Applicant: HEIRS OF GRANT W. LEFT Enclosed is the Decision of the BOARD OF APPEALS which has this day been filed in the office of the Nantucket Town Clerk. An Appeal from this Decision may be taken pursuant to Section 17 of Chapter 40A, Massac2ausetts General Laws. Any action appealing the Decision must be brought by filing an complaint in court within TWENTY (20) days after this days date. Notice of the action with a copy of the complaint and certified copy of the Decision must be given to the Town Clerk so as to be received within such fiWENTY (20) days. Dale W. Waine Chairman cc: Town Clerk Planning Board Building Commissioner PLEASE NOTE: MOST SPECIAL PERMITS AND VARIANCES HAVE A TIME LIMJT AND WILL $XPIRE IF NOT ACTED UPON AGCQRDING-TO NANTUCKET TUNING BY-LAW ~139~30I (SPECIAL FERMITS); §239-32I {VARIANCES) ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE CALL THE NANTUCKET ZONING f30ARD OF APPEALS. S0'd tiHZ 1BJiJf11N-~N 6~:SL 866ti-80-.ltiW BOARD pF APPEALS TOWN OF NANTUCKET NANTUCKET, MASSACHUSETTS 02554 DECISIQN: The BOARD OF APPEALS, at a public hearing held on Friday, Apri110,1998, at 1:00 P.M. in the conference room of the Town Annex Building at 37 Washington Street, Nantucket, Massachusetts, made the following DECISION on the application (033-9$} of the HEI12S OF GRANT W. LEFT, (Roselyn R. Leet, Jack Bruce Briganti and Dan Henry Brigand} c/o Marylyn Leet, 6113 Leitch Lane, Tracy's Landing, Maryland 20779, owners by virtue of Certificate of Title No. 18355 at the Nantucket Registry District for the Land Court. 1. The Applicants are seeking relief by VARIANCE pursuant to Nantucket Zoning $y-Law section 139-32A from the Intensity Regulations of Nantucket Zoning By-Law section 139-1bA (front yard setback) and a SPECIAL PERMIT under Nantucket Zoning By-Law section 139-16C(1), to reduce the westerly front yard setback from School Street from the required thirty {30} feet to then {10) feet, and to reduce the easterly side yard setback requirement from ten (10) feet to five (5) feet, respectively. Applicants propose to construct a 24+ x 33 +single-family dwelling. This 792 square - foot structure would result in a 3.7±% ground Dover ratio in a district that allows a maximum ground cover ration of 12.5% or 1500 square feet far this 21,106 ± square-foot lot situated in an 12-2 district that requires a minimum lot size of 20,000 square feet and in a LUG-2 district that requires a minimum lot size of 80,000 square feet. The structure will be built entirely within that portion of the Lot that is situated in the R-2 zoning district. Applicants applied fax and received a Variance and Special Permit from this Board on August 23,1991, BOA File No. 049-91. The Decision was appealed by various butters, with the Decision being upheld by the Superior Court and judgment entered in favor of the Applicants- The Special Permit relief has not expired by will do so during the hearing process for this Application. The Variance relief granted in BOA File No. 049-91 has arguably expired prior to this Application being filed and. Applicants are now before this $oard seeking re-issuance of both the Variance and Special Permit relief. A similar Application with submitted and subsequently withdrawn without prejudice in BOA File N~. (?0&-98. The Premises is located at 24 WEST'EItN AVENUE, Assessor's Map 87, Parcel 76, Land Court Plan No. 8256-B, Lot A. The property is zoned RESIDENTIAL-2 and LIMITED-USE-GENERAL-2. 2. The Board's decision is based upon the application and materials submitted with it, plans, and representations and testimony received at the hearing on April 10,1998. There was one letter of opposition to the requested Variance and Special Permit, and one abutter appeared in opposition at the hearing. Based on the previous Superior Court ruling, the Planning Board recommended that the requested relief be granted, ~~d dSZ l~~i~(11NhJN G1b~Ci s~~.~-s~G-aHi,i 3. The Applicant applied far and received a Variance and a Special Permit from the Board an August 23,1991, in conn4~ction with this property at 24 Western Avenue (,Assessor's Map 87, Parcel 76; ZBA File No. 049-91). That decision was appealed by various abutters (Nantucket Superior Court Case No. 91-83) aril the Board's decision was upheld by the Superior Court after a trial. The Judgment in that case was entered on October 18,1993. Because this property consists of land subject to the state and local wetlands protection act, rua Building Permit could have issued for any structure on the site without a valid Order of Conditions undex both the state and the local wetlands laws. After extensive hearings and litigation the Nantucket Conservation Commission issued an Order of Conditions under the Nantucket Wetlands By-law on November 2i, 1995, and under the state wetlands protection act, the Department of Environmental Protection issued a Superseding Order of Conditions approving the project on November 10, 1995. This Superseding Order was appealed by abutters to an administrative law judge at DEP, and the final derision of that judge dismissing the abutters' appeal of the Superseding Order was dated .~pril 16, 1996. The 1Taritance issued by the Board of Appeals was therefore valid until May 16, 1997. Before the Variance expired, the Applicant applied for asix-month extension wl-uch was granted by the Board on May 15,1997. The Variance has expired as of November 16,1997. The Special Permit granted by the Board is still valid and will not expire until May 16,199$. 4. The Applicants represented through counsel that the lot, which is a~n existing vacant lot of record that was created in 1922 and has been held in separate ownership, is 40 feet wide and has an area of 21,106 square feet according to the record plan (which area is in fact much larger given the accretion of the beach along this part of the Island). The property is bounded by School Street to the west and Western Avenue to the north, both of which are public ways shown on the Land Court Plan. The Applicants request that the School Street fxontage be consid-erect the #rflnt yard and that the setback from School Street be diminished from 30 feet to 1p feet, which relief may be granted by a Variance under the Nantucket Zoning By-Law. The Applicant also requesfis that the side yard setback be reduced from 10 feet to 5 feet along the easterly lot line, which relief may be granted by Special Permit in this RESIDENTIAL-2 zone under the Nantucket Zoning By-Law. At the public hearing, the Applicants agreed to maintain a 17 foot setback from the southerly elevation of the dwelling to Western Avenue, exclusive of an entry or stairs, though the required minimum setback under the By-Law is only 1iJ feet. 5. Therefore, the Board finds that due to the extrerxte narrowness of the lot and the embankment which separates the house site from the beach are unique circumstances relating to the shape, topography and soil conditions which specifically affect this lot but do not generally affect the zoning district, Iiteral enforcement of the front yard setback provisions of the Zoning By-Law off School Street would render this validly pre-existing lot unbuildable and cause a substantial hardship to the Applicants. ~0 ' d t1HZ 13:~i~fllNyhl 8b : S ti 866 ti -BED-ndW With respect to the Variance, concern was expressed at the public heaxing regarding safety at the intersection of School and Western Avenue. However, the Board finds given the topography of School Street, the gate at the entrance to School Street that is locked by the Town to prohibit vehicular beach traffic during sununer days, the siting of the existing houses in this area, and general traffic patterns, the Board finds a 10 foot setback from School Street will be adequate and will not create a traffic hazard pattern- Itwas represented to the Board of Appeals that the Applicant proposed a structure with no more than 792 squarn feet of ground cover. Such a structure is consistent with other houses in the neighborhood and the Board further finds that the relief requested to allow the construction of a house of this size is consistent with the neighborhood and thus may be granted without detriment to the public good and without nullifying the intent and purpose of the By-Law. 6. With respect to the Special Permit for the reduced sideline setback, the proposed structure's setback is consistent with the separation between other structures in the neighborhood- The $oard finds that the side-yard reduction from XO to 5 feet is in harmony with the general purpose and intent of the Zoning By-Law, and will not be substantially more detrimental to the neighborhood. 7. For the reasons set forth herein, the Board by a unanimous vote hereby GRANTS a VARIANCE to the extent necessary under Section 139-16A so as to reduce the required front yard setback from School Street from 30 feet to 10 feet and hereby GRANTS a SPECIAL 1'ERN11T under Section 139-16C(1) so as to reduce the side yard setback from 10 feet to 5 feet along the easterly boundary on the following conditions: (a) that the ground cover as defined in the Zoning By-Law far the structure to be constructed on the Premises not exceed 792 square feet, with a maximum building envelope (exclusive of decks} of approximately 24x33 feet; (b) there shall be screening maintained along the upland portion of the easterly boundary; (c) the dwelling, exclusive of an entry or stairs, be constructed no closer than 17 feet from Western Avenue; and {d} that one parking spacersl~all~e provided on-site, ~ Dated: May ~ 7.948 RECEIVED TOWN C K~ S ~ 02554 NANT1-1C MAY 0 8 1998 TIME:.-...---- CLERK: Dale W. Waiv.,e~1,~Chairman b@'d dH2 13~i~f11NaN tib:SZ 866:-88-~.t1W Timothy R. Madden TOWN OF NANTUCKET ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS 37 WASHINGTON STREET NANTUCKET, MASSACHUSETTS 02554 PHONE 508-228-7215 FAX 508-228-7205 NOTICE PLEASE BE ADVISED• AS THE MEETING IS SCHEDIILED ON GOOD FRIDAY/PASSOVER, SHOIILD YOII HAVE RELIGIOIIS CONSTRAINTS PROHIBITING ATTENDANCE, PLEASB CALL THE OFFICE ASAP AND EVERY EFFORT FTILL BE MADE TO ACCOMMODATE YOII A Public Hearing of the NANTUCKET BOARD OF APPEALS will be held at-1:00 P.M., FRIDAY, APRIL 10, 1998, in the CONFERENCE ROOM, TOWN ANNEX BIIILDING, 37 WASHINGTON STREET, Nantucket, Massachusetts, on the Application of the following: HEIRS OF GRANT W. LEET BOARD OF APPEALS FILE N0. 033-98 Applicants are seeking relief by VARIANCE pursuant to Nantucket Zoning By-Law §139-32A from the Intensity Regulations of Nantucket Zoning By-Law §139-16A (front yard setback) and a SPECIAL PERMIT under Nantucket Zoning By-Law §139-16C(1), to reduce the westerly front yard setback from School Street from the required thirty (30) feet to ten. (10) feet, and to reduce the easterly side yard setback requirement from ten (10) feet to five (5) feet, respectively. Applicants propose to construct a 24+~ x 33+~ single-family dwelling. This 792+ square-foot structure would result in a 3.7+% ground cover ratio in a district that allows a maximum ground cover ratio of 12.5% or 1500 square feet for this undersized 2,106+ square-foot .lot situated in an R-2 district that requires a minimum lot size of 20,000 square feet and in an LUG-2 district that requires a minimum lob size of 80,000 square feet. The structure will be built entirely within that portion of the Lot that is situated in the R-2 zoning district. Applicants applied for and received a Variance and Special Permit from this Board on August 23, 1991, BOA File No. 049-91. The Decision was appealed by various abutters, with the Decision being upheld by the Superior Court and judgement entered in favor of the Applicants. The Special Permit relief has not expired but will do so during the hearing process for this Application. The Variance relief granted in BOA File No. 049-91 has arguably expired prior to this Application being filed and Applicants are now before this Board seeking re-issuance of both the Variance and Special Permit relief. A similar Application was submitted and subsequently withdrawn without prejudice in BOA File No. 008-98. The Premises is locate at 24 WESTERN AVENUE, Assessor's .Map 87, Parcel 76, Land Court Plan 8256-B, Lot A. The property is zoned Residential-2 and Limited-Use-General-2. Dale W. Waine, Chairman :'C:+ F~- .•~ ; - ~_ ~ IQiuiTUCI':ET ZONING BOARD OF I',PPF.ALS TOP]DI AND COUNTY BUILDING Date ~ / NANTUCKET, MA 02554 mac- (sue/ Case ATo.V~-_ APPLICATION FOR RELIEF Oc,~ner's name(s): Heirs of Grant lJ. Leet Maillrig address: c/o fioselen Leet, 6113 Leitch lane Tracy's L~ndine• `iP '0779 Applicant's Name: Sa1nC Mailing Address: Location of Lot: Assessor's map and parcel number 47 - 76 Street Address: _ 2y 4destcrn Avenue, Nantucket AtA 02554 Registry Land Court Plan 556-B Lot n L.C. Cent Date lot acquired: 6 /~ /~ ~C~1.CTSyXY:S~K 1165 Zoning district x-2/LUC-2 Uses on lot - commercial: None XXX or i~ICD? - number of: dwel'_ings duple:i_ apartments rental roans Building date(s): all pre-9/72? or \one C of 0? Building Permit appl.Nos. None Case Nos. all BOA application Nos. 049-91 State fully all zoning relief sought and respective Code sections and subsections, specifically what you propose compared to present and what grounds you urge for BoA to make each finding per Section. 139-32A \ if Variance, 139-30A ~ if a Special Permit ;and 139-33A _ if to alter or extend a nonconforming use). If appeal eer 139-31A B _, attach decision or order appealed. OK to attacl: addenduT. . See Addendum A attached. RECEIVE TOWN CLERK'S O~~ll:o~` NANTUCKET, M>n (32:~~~ MAR 2 41998 " DIME: ~". ~a P!`'1 - ? s-f ,~ ~1~ ~RK:_~ __ Items enclosed as part of this Application: order ,i addendum- ~1.L Locus map~L Site plan~yy showing present_ +plannedy~ structures Floor plans present_ proposed- elevations- (HDC approved Listings lot areay~ frontage,~yl setbacks Xxx GCRy~ parking data Assessor-certified addressee list 4 sets XXX mailing labels 2 sets S200 fee payable to Town of Nantucket proof3 'cap' covenant 1(If an appeal, ask Town Clerk to send Bldg Comr's record to 30 .) I certify that the requested information submitted is substantially complete a nd true to the best of my knowledge, under the pains and penalties of perjury. SIGNATURE.: By: Attorney/Agent ys 1 Melissa D. Phi rick . 3(If not etmer or oa:ner's attorney enclosA nronf ^f ~tr~~t^ ,~t FOR~BoA OFFICE USE //~~ ~ ,Q~~~ Application copies rec' d: ~// or_ for BoA on c~ //~,/1~~b.~ `"- -" One copy filed with Tot:~n Clerk on~/~/~~by ~-f~~-C/ complete? 1~ One copy each to Planning Bd and Building)Dfept/~~'~~by ~G~ $200 fee check given Totan Treasurer on~/"GI/~~~by?c~C~-~~:•aived? ~-J Hearing notice posted~~~/c/~ailed~,~/(4I&i~'k-~/~<~~?f~d Hearing(s) on_/_/_ cont'd to_/_/_, _/_/_ withdra'.:'n?_/_/_ Decision due by_/_/_ ntade_/_/_ filed TC_/_/_ mailed-/_/_ See related cases lawsuits other /** all t:'ith proper sign-offs; 13875-96 open permit for cn.go~r.q net;ovations. - ADDENDUM The Applicant owns Lot A on Land Court Plan No. 8256-B (a copy of which is attached). This forty foot wide Lot has been held in separate ownership since acquired in 1923. This lot of record has an area of 21,106 square feet. Since the 1922 Land Court plan, more than 10,000 square feet for additional land has been added as a result of accretion. The Applicant applied for and received a Variance and a Special Permit from the Board on August 23,1991, in connection with this property at 24 Western Avenue (Assessor's Map 87, Parce176; ZBA File No. 049-91). That decision was appealed by various abutters (Nantucket Superior Court Case No. 91-83) and the Board's decision was upheld by the Superior Court after a trial. The Judgment in that case was entered on October 18,1993. Because this property consists of land subject to the state and local wetlands protection act, no Building Permit could have issued for any structure on the site without a valid Order of Conditions under both the state and the local wetlands laws. After extensive hearings and litigation the Nantucket Conservation Commission issued an Order of Conditions under the Nantucket Wetlands By-law on November 21,1995, and under the state wetlands protection act, the Department of Environmental Protection issued a Superseding Order of Conditions approving the project on November 10,1995. This Superseding Order was appealed by abutters to an administrative law judge at DEP, and the final decision of that judge dismissing the abutters' appeal of the Superseding Order was dated Apri116,1996. The Variance issued by the Board of Appeals was therefore valid until May 16, 1997. Before the Variance expired, the Applicant applied for asix-month extension which was granted by the Board on May 15, 1997. The Variance has expired as of November 16,1997. The Special Permit granted by the Board is still valid and will not expire until May 16,1998. None of the circumstances under which the initial application was filed have changed, and the Applicant merely seeks a re-issuance of the Variance and the Special Permit. The Applicant still proposes to construct a 24 foot by 33 foot single family dwelling at the top of the embankment adjacent to Western Avenue as shown on the attached plot plan. This 792 square foot structure would result in a 3.7% ground cover given the area of the Lot shown on the recorded plan. The portion of the Lot where the structure will be constructed is zoned R-2 which has an allowable ground cover of 12.5%. In order to construct this dwelling, zoning relief is necessary with respect to the setback requirements. The Lot is bounded to the north by Western Avenue which is an improved public way, and to the west by School Street which is a 40 foot wide public way used for access to the beach. Under current interpretations the front yard setback of 30 feet would only be measured from one of the streets with a 10 foot side yard setback from the other street and from the eastern property line. The location of the coastal bank and the unusual shape of this lot makes adherence to the front yard setback impossible. The Applicant requests that a ~a~iance ber eissued reducing the~back from School Street from the 30 feet required to 10 feet. The Applicant's plan shows a 17 foot setback requested from Western Avenue instead of the 10 foot side yard setback required, which setback is consistent with the setback from Western Avenue of the immediately adjacent cottage. Similarly, the reduction in the side yard setback on the easterly boundary from 10 to 5 feet is consistent with the neighborhood and in harmony with tie general purpose and inte ,,f,,th.~J ~~~, Zoning By-law:- ~ } ~o ~ ~.~rn l~ 9 -lCu Cz C/) ~C~" ~ ~~ -.sr -e.-~-- C~C~ ~Pi ~c-~e Ycx~c~ G~ The extreme narrowness of the Lot and the embankment which separates the house site from the beach are unique circumstances relating to the shape of the land and its soil conditions which specifically affect this Lot but do not generally affect the R-2 Zoning District. A literal enforcement of the front yard setback provisions of the Zoning By-Law would involve substantial hardship to the Applicant given that the Lot would be rendered unbuildable. The relief requested is consistent with development in this area of Surfside and may be granted without detriment to the public good and without nullifying the intent and purpose of the By-Law. The Board's decision to grant this same Variance and Special Permit has been upheld by the Court, no circumstances have changed and accordingly, relief by Variance and by Special Permit as requested should be granted. Y .~ 0 O a ~ N C 1 ~ ~ C~ w b O O U > w p Z ~ cn N J ~ ~ O~ D ~- Z Y N $ ? ~ wg,. > z a z ti '' a -~ a ~ z W W ~ U ~ z ~ Q W a~ W ~ ~- p d J _~ o ~ t0 N ~ ~_ , ~ . ~: ~ U p a Z -. Z (,~ > Q 0 2 m~ _ ~ ~ ~ V ~ ~ C X tJ v V O Q O p Z LL a¢ ~' U ~ ~ ~ 7 ~ a ` N r] = "-' Q .~ d rJ ~ Z w a~ ~ N QQ a ~' C~ c i N W ~ ~ ~ ^ ~ ~ V ~WYY W~h~ Q "' o ~ w I L1J ~ o N O >- I w ~ J I p I I Z~ ~ I F~- o ~//•~~ ~ z I °° °' r Z I N= a . Q~ I v/ 2 I ~ W ~ J ~ ~g w~ ~ ~ I ~n Y w Q ~ ~ ~ W~4 O LL Z h~ `= W 3 Z ~ Y Q 4 O ~ s~ ~ 2 _ _ _ °~ '1d~ AVENUE s ~ W I~EI ~ 30' a ~OO' - ~ - WESTERN ~ ~PUg~~c N s~ z - ,~ h ~ ~ v.a / W3 ~ ~ `. -~ ~ ~. W~ ~ ~ ~ n V` r-QN3 iI] ~l] J J \~ I' ~/ `~\~ II 11 / ~: ~ , anoN`\y ~ ~ '~~ faL-~ O ti ` J W3 0 V Q U ~ ~ a c ~ .y W Z N 2 '~ 2 )NE LINE R~2 ~UG•2 z O ~, >~ ~~--"' 7i Y u ~ w~~ .v z, ~ , ~.~{I--~II 9 i ~ ~ LJ ' ~ ~ i -r z 1 p o° a i~ W ¢ I a 4 w / ~ F- O j4 ~ O Q U W LL J O - J~ ~ C - ~ l J // /~ SINE ~ ZONE RUG•2 1 a O _~y is ~m ao V m k~2 ~ Whti c t C i ~ ~~ _ ~ ~ , EOA FOR~4 PROPERTY OGINER NANTUCKET ZOl`IING BOAP.D OF APPEALS T0~~1N AND COUl`iTY BUILDIi•1G NANTUCKET, Pte? 02554 ASSESSOR'S LIST OF PARTIES IN Ii•1TEP,EST Grant I.eet F.PPLICANT FOR RELIEF (SAME? ); ADDRESS OF PROPERTY: 24 Western Avenue, Nantucket, I`W 02554 2/8~ Roselyn Leet, Daniel Briganti, Jack Briganti ASSESSOR'S C~IAP/PARCEL: i`[ap 87 _ Parcel 76 LIST OF PARTIES INCLUDING ADDRESSES * (OR SEE ATTACHED ) A I certify that tYie foregoing (or the attached ) lists all persons, natural or legal, who are owners of abutting property, owners of land directly opposite on any public or private street or way; and abutters of the abutters and all other land owners within three hundred feet of the property line of Owner's property, as they (and their address) appear o:1 the most recent applicable tax list [per M.G.L. c. 40A, §11 and Zoning Cc~'i: Chapter 139, §139-29D(2)]. Date Assessor's Office Town of Nantucket -;~TL: Applic~Int (P`tltlOn?r) should include ~•;ith the lot for ~•-hich <, _~'_ieE is sought, an~~ conunonlti~-o:•med abutting lots ~•;hich r.~.ight become ~:~•.•o1~,~zd in th? zoning matter. List map and parcels for each abutter. Submitted by: Melissa D. Philbrick, Attorn2~.~ Data : it,, .,,char 1 4, 1 X97 -- .. ,,., r '--= ~' -- i -~-~-- - _ - --- -- ---- ?i i3!=~i • ~ 3'':2" lh .?'~ M:.IL IVG A~D.RcS$ LIiT •'a:lock Lo_ O~Jrer's/Co-Ovner's tlan~ fleilirg Andres:/City State Z'~p Pra,c<r:y L xa:icn CJ27 C0.°.1 *A°THORP CARL R T_II TRUSTr:E 003 SOJTF! CCME P~ OG32 UEiT~Br: :,V THE MART LOUIS= APTH09P iR .;;T hU33Ar?~ST~r~i•A O1»;? GOe7 00?,C ~rIARTU;:KET N:.TERVIE.+ ASSOC L_C c T;.JT=h1J .,.;'! C;:C S:=STEP:: .., K~::TU~F=- r1:. C=~.4 GOG? G07L`~*NAtITUCKET 61ATERVIEd ASSGC LLC 1,i TAti'E;'G kA'! 0%%D '^~ STER;' A:' r:;NTUI.'KE` IiA C2554 ;0°7 :1072 J~MlSON CAROLYtI H Gi2C .100DLA;IC AVc OG?a kESTEn!~ A'! SUMMIT PI: C79r,i CCc7 0077 JEMISO)I STEVErI 0?2J uc09LAt+v AVE CC26 1JESTERrI AI Slrrl'".:T t:J 07SOo C087 007> HARVEY ELEAtIOR K :c:0? fiREEPiLA':Jil D,R GC22 w.5'i ERtI AV FSETrESDr MD 202i~ GO27 0074 HULLER JarlES E PO 3Gx 605 C02C WES'ERr~ AV 'r.OLLA1+~ P~ 1E9~6 0087 C073 ROP:TZKY STEVEN E CEC ILIA SOX 2= ::C.B IJCJIEKi: A'/ S'ILLL!~TER r.Y 12i7:; ~Oc7 0072 JARRELL rIANTUCKET RLTY TRUS' 0'.73 ALUM A:E OCi6 L.ES"fcRN A/ \E'dTOM MA 0:'i6° Opt? 0071 *DALTO`1 GEORGE E PAJLIN£ AN.; 2:5 F'.SErU DRIVE GC14 UESTER>. A'! ELOOr1FIELD ~:: 53045 pp37 009: AtiERICAtI YOJTH HOSTELS INC D5A 1020 COMMOrI~JEALTH AVE CC31 NESTERtI AV STAR CF T4"c SEA Y'(H rIS'L BOiTG;! Ma 0221; 0027 0091 AMES NOMINEE TROST G25G SA"IS r1ICHaAY GJ01 STAT!Crl ST C/0 MRS DOROTHY COOPER A;"Ei tIE'~ CARAAN CT 05440 OU?,7 0152 COFFIN HEPIR'( EST 0= 0102 CROSSERGO;< CD CC27 S~ESTEk?! AV C/0 COFFIY H=NRY Ne'n M'_LfCR: CT 0%76-3C65 0037 0096 ~MCMASTER CLAUDE H ETAL OC53 RACEERCCK RG 0025 tlEiTERN AV S "ERID(,r. CT Oc451 0087 OG97 DAMS HELEN V TR 0;12 NARVAEZI ST CG21 L:ESTERN AV THE DAMS FAMIL'( REALTY TRUST VctIICE FL 34285 G027 OG99 *FISHER JOHN N JR E DARCEY D 32 F: :M ST (`C15 WESTER?: AV DOVER F:A 02030 pp27 0100 RS ILLY FETER C R LETIZIA •'.i r!JMcUARp LN G;69 S'JRFSID E RD WALPGLE !1r OZO~i 6087 0117 TERRIO t1ARY c G127 SUNi1ER S'{ GC11 WESTER:] AV IJALTHAII MA C21:4 0087 0116 (~~ QCI_P,RIO ARTHUP, R ETAL C12% SUY.MER 5- 0004 CONGNICUS ST ;:A~THA'( t!A 02154 OOB7 012? KATZ FRAtIK D E GRAESER Eh!ILY T ?:iCC CASYGN RC 000.3 AURIGA S~~ SANTA FE MM 37501 G087 0151 ~OFFIN HENRY EST OF C102 CROSSBROOK P.D 0004 AURIGA ST C/0 COFFIN H"cNRY NEt+ r1ILFORD CT 06776-3065 C08' O1»8 MCPIAMUS AGNES M ETA! 0002 GXSO41 LPi 0006 AURIGA ST C/0 P rICMAtIUS DOVER trH 03820-2126 Cpg' 0149 FOLGER DAVID TR C00? :VY Lrl 0003 STATION ST MARION ALLEPI FOLGcR TP ~ALMO'JTri Mn 02540 PArE t1'JAS7~~.