The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About037-99TOWN OF NANTUCKET BOARD OF APPEALS NANTUCKET, MASSACHUSETTS 02554 Date: July 27 ~ 19 99 To: Parties in Interest and. Others concerned with the Decision of the BOARD OF APPEALS in the Application of the following: Application No.: 037--99 Owner/Applicant: RICHARD GALLAGHER APPEAL OF WAYNE AND HARBAJAN SILTANEN BUILDING PERMIT Enclosed is the Decision of the BOARD OF APPEALS which has this day been filed in the office of the Nantucket Town Clerk. An Appeal from this Decision may be taken pursuant to Section 17 of Chapter 40A, Massachusetts General Laws. Any action appealing the Decision must be brought by filing an complaint in court within TWENTY (20) days after this day's date. Notice of the action with a copy of the complaint and certified copy of the Decision must be given to the Town Clerk so as to be received within such TWENTY (20) days. -~.~'~a ~------ Nancy Se~rens ~ Chairman (Acting.; For Linda F. Williams cc: Town Clerk Planning Board Building Commissioner PLEASE NOTE: MOST SPECIAL PERMITS AND VARIANCES HAVE A TIME LIMIT AND WILL EXPIRE IF NOT ACTED UPON ACCORDING~TO NANTUCKET ZONING BY-LAW §139-30I (SPECIAL PERMITS); §139-32I (VARIANCES) ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE CALL THE NANTUCKET ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS. TOWN OF NANTUCKET ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS 37 WASHINGTON STREET NANTUCKET, MASSACHUSETTS 02554 Assessor's Map: 39 Address: 5 Douglas Way Parcel: 54 Plan File '48-0, Lot 3 Zoning District: LUG-2 Deed Ref. 547-182 At a public hearing of the Nantucket Zoning Board of Appeals held at 1:00 p.m., Friday, May 14, 1999, in the Conference Room at the Town Building Annex, 37 Washington St., Nantucket, Massachusetts, the Board made the following decision on the application for relief filed by RICHARD GALLAGHER APPEAL OF WAYNE AND HARBAJAN SILTANEN BUILDING PERMIT, 721 Cedar Street, Walpole, MA 02081, Zoning Board of Appeals file no. 037-99: 1 The applicant is APPEALING, under Nantucket Zoning Bylaw § 139-31, the Building Commissioner's issuance of Building Permit No. 564-98, as amended 3/29/99, to Wayne and Harbajan Siltanen, 7804 Manor House Drive, Fairfax Station, Virginia 22039. The applicant alleges that the Building Commissioner issued the amended permit in error as the new single-family dwelling under construction on the locus violates Nantucket Zoning Bylaw §§ 139-16A (intensity regulations -frontage and front yard setback), 139-18 (parking requirements), and 139-20.1B(2)(e) (curb cut requirements). Applicant further alleges that while the owners of the property have maintained in their permit applications that Douglas Way is the legal frontage, Douglas Way provides less than the minimum legally required frontage with no access or parking shown upon the plan submitted to the Building Department on which the structure was based. In addition, the permitted structure arguable would be sited within the required 35-foot front yard setback. Applicant further requests that this Board make a finding that the front yard setback is to be measured from the frontage from which access must also be made, without variance relief having first been issued by this Board, as stated in § 139- 20.1 B(2)(e). The premises is located at 5 Douglas Way (AKA Renown Road), Assessor's Map 39, Parcel 54, Plan File 48-0, Lot 3. The property is zoned Limited-Use-General-2. 2. The Board's decision is based upon the application and accompanying materials, and representations and testimony received at the above referenced public hearing. The Planning Board voted to withhold any recommendation to the Zoning Board of Appeals. 3. The applicant/appellant's position before the Board is that the Siltanens and the Building Commissioner are interpreting the bylaw in a manner that circumvents the frontage requirement. The lot in question was part of a subdivision approved by the nantucket Planning Board as an ANR subdivision on March 25, 1996, that utilized frontage averaging to create a buildable lot with 88.20 feet of frontage on Eel Point Road, and specified Eel Point Road as the frontage for such purposes. Thus, under the subdivision control law, the frontage chosen by the party originally subdividing the lot was Eel Point Road. The Siltanens began construction of a dwelling on the lot, pursuant to a permit (number 564-98) issued by the Building Commissioner, which uses Renown Road as the address of the subject property but claims legal frontage from Eel Point Road for the setback requirements imposed by the zoning bylaw in section 139-16A. This section requires a 35-foot front yard setback as well as 15-foot side and rear yard setbacks. From the plans they submitted to the Building Department, the Siltanen's dwelling appears to be situated several hundred feet from Eel Point Road, the front lot line for setback purposes, and 17.7 feet from Douglas Way, which would be the rear lot line. Thus, by designating Eel Point Road as the frontage, the building complies with setback requirements. In March of 1999, the Siltanens submitted a request to amend the building permit in which they specified 5 Douglas Way as their address, showing no access to the property at all, as would be required by the bylaw. But, if Douglas Way were considered the frontage, as the Siltantens now propose for purposes of their driveway and curb cut, the dwelling would illegally lie inside the 35-foot front yard setback off of Douglas Way. The applicant/appellant argues that what the Siltanen's essentially have done, is designate two different frontages (or three), one from Eel Pont Road and one from Douglas Way, permitting them to ignore the overall intent of the bylaw and build a dwelling that violates either the intensity/setback elements of the bylaw contained in § 139-16A, or the curb cut element of the bylaw contained within § 139-20.1B(2)(e). The applicant notes that the Siltanens have never amended their subdivision plan to allow frontage to be considered from Douglas Way. Thus their legal frontage remains Eel Point Road. The curb cut bylaw, §139-20.1B(e) requires that driveways shall derive legal access solely from the legal street frontage of the lot, unless otherwise permitted herein. Beyond that, the applicants raise safety and traffic concerns about bringing the driveway off of the private Douglas Way. They note that the road serves a limited number of homes and that adding another, the Siltanens, who have the means of accessing the more trafficked Eel Point Road, places an unnecessary burden on the lesser developed, private, Douglas Way, as well as the adjoining neighborhood. They further note that as an unimproved way, under the definitions of both frontage and street, contained within the definitions section of the bylaw, Douglas Road may not provide legal frontage for the Siltanen's lot. 4. The position advanced by the Siltanen's in defense of their permit, is that the bylaw regulating curb cuts explicitly provides: "Driveways servicing a building or use shall derive legal access based on the owner-designated frontage on the street." §139- 20.1B(2)(e). The Siltanen's maintain that this clearly permits them to choose the street from which their driveway enters their property. If the bylaw required that the driveway come from some frontage already established, either by the zoning bylaw in general, or the Planning Board in the course of endorsing an ANR subdivision, it would not specify that the owner may designate the frontage. 5. Upon consideration of the testimony and exhibits presented in the application and at the hearing, the Board concluded that although the bylaw permits an owner to designate the frontage for a curb cut and driveway, the Siltanen's already made this designation when they chose Eel Point Road for purposes of front yard and rear yard setbacks. Having built their house within what would have been the front yard setback from Douglas Way, had Douglas Way been the frontage, the Siltanen's may not now change their designation and choose Douglas Way as their frontage for purposes of the curb cut law. Although the bylaw permits them to pick their frontage, it does not permit them to keep switching it back and forth for whatever advantage doing so serves at the moment. The Board has consistently held that front yard setback must be maintained from the stated frontage. Any amendments to the building permit must maintain Eel Point Road as the frontage, in conformity with the choice made earlier by the Siltanens in siting their dwelling. And according to the Zoning Bylaw, §139-20.1B(2)(e), driveway access must be from the legal frontage, Eel Point Road absent any relief from this Board or the Planning Board. The amended Building Permit thus was issued in error, and no driveway access or parking was shown as required by the bylaw. Accordingly, upon a motion made by Mr. Murphy to overturn the Building Inspectors amendment to the building permit designating Douglas Way as the frontage, a motion seconded by Mr. Toole, the Board voted unanimously to approve the motion. The APPEAL is GRANTED and the amended building permit designating Douglas Way as the frontage is hereby void. Dated: July ~ ~ 1999 Linda Williams Na cy Sevrens DECEIVED TOW~1 ~.LERi<'S OFFICE NANTt,IC;KET, MA 02554 JUL 2 7 1999 TIM[_: ._._ _.. CLERK: ~ j', j ~ (~ Ne a ent TOWN OF NANTUCKET ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS 37 WASHINGTON STREET NANTUCKET, MASSACHUSETTS 02554 PHONE 508-228-7215 FAX 508-228-7205 NOTICE A Public Hearing of the NANTUCKET ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS will be held at 12:00 P.M., FRIDAY, MAY 14, 1999, in the CONFERENCE ROOM, TOWN ANNEX BUILDING, 37 Washington Street, Nantucket, Massachusetts, on the Application of the following: RICHARD GALLAGHER APPEAL OF WAYNE AND HARBAJAN SILTANEN BUILDING PERMIT BOARD OF APPEALS FILE N0. 037-99 Applicant (Gallagher) is APPEALING issuance of Building Permit No. 564-98 as amended 3/29/99, by the Building .Commissioner, under Nantucket Zoning Bylaw §139-31. Applicant alleges that said Building Permit was issued in error as the new single-family dwelling being constructed upon the Locus in the current location is said to be in violation of Nantucket Zoning Bylaw §139-16A (Intensity Regulations - frontage and front yard setback), §139-18 (Parking Requirements), and §139-20.1 B(2)(e) (Curb Cut Requirements). It is said that the owners of the property have indicated that Douglas Way is the legal frontage, which has subminimum frontage with no access or parking area shown upon the plan submitted to the Building. Department on which issuance of said amended Building Permit was based upon. In addition, said structure would arguably be sited within the required 35-foot front yard setback area. Applicant is further asking the Board to make a finding that the front yard setback is to be measured from the frontage from which access must also be made, without Variance relief having been issued by this Board, as stated in §139-20.1 B(2)(e). The Premises is located at 5 DOUGLAS WAY (AKA 6 RENOUWN ROAD) Assessor's Map 39, Parcel 54, Plan File 48-0, Lot 3. The property is zoned Limited-Use-General-2. ~~~~~~ 1 Dale W. Waine, Chairman THlS NOTICE IS AVAILABLE IN LARGE PRINT O~R C~THCR ALTERNATIVE. FORMA_ TS FOR _ ASS~ISTANC~E %ALL _ _._ _! .r '~' ;,`~ ~y,; ~.~ . +,;; ~BoA Form 1-89 .:.. owner's name (s) : ~,'`° Mailing address: ,' Applicant's name: Mailing address: NANTIICRET ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS TOWDT AND COIINTY BIIILpINO NAN'~'IIC~ET, MA 02554 Location of lot: Assessor'h map and parcel number~3~' -, ~ ~` Street address: Registry Land Ct 'Plan, $l~+n Bk & Pg Date lot acquired: ~,_/_ Deed Ref _,_ D~-Q CASE No~~- ~j ~,g ~ Q I~ot 3 district LUG'-a Uses on lot -.commercial:'None or MCD?_ - number of: dwellings / a plex~ spar ments_ rental rooms- Building date(s): all pxs-8/72? or / C of o?_ &uilding Permit appl'n. Nos. S~~f~B' / f G Case Nos. all 8oA applications, lawsuits: State fully all toningg relief sought and respective Code sections and subsections, specifically what you ppropose compared to present and what grounds You urge for BoA to make each finding per Section 139-32A if Variance, 139-10A if a Special Permit (and 139-33A ~Bif to alter or extend a nonconforming use). If appeal per 139-3]~A _ , attach decision or order appealed. OK to attach addendum . C~~ Items enclosed as part of this Application: orderl addendum2 Locus map- Site pplan showing present +plan~ structures Floor plans present proposed- elevates (HDZ approved?_). Listings lot area frontage setbacks,- G~ parking data Assessor-certifiecTadc}ressee• Tit 4 sets- ma~l~ng labels 2 sets= 200 fee payable to Town of Nantucket ppragf 'cap' covenant (I! an appeal, ask Torm Clerk•to send~ldg ComrT reoord to BOAT I certify that the requested information submitted is substantially complete and true to the best of my knowledge, under the pains and penalties o~perjury. SIGNATURE: ~~~ ~,.~-2p,-e~1~.hpplicant /Attorney/agent _ 3(If not ownex or owner's attorney, enclose proof of authority) 1 ~. 9 W ~ U~ -, ~~ ~0~.. rn r~ Q7 V W L~Li ~ ~ -s Y c~ U ~~ ~` ~~~ ~ ~. i.: FOR BoA OFFICE USE Application copies recd: 4_ ~or for ~Bo~A on ~by One copy tiled with Town Clerk on~~~J'l[L by complete~?v~' 4 "'~- one copy each to Planning Sd and Building Dept~~/~- by~~~~ 5200 fee check giyeri T wn~Trgeasurer on~t' /2_/r~- by waived?_ Hearing notice posted, L/~~ l/ ~ malled~/L~ f~ I & M ~~/~ ~ ~~~ Hearing (s) on___/,_/_ cont' ~~ to_/~_, ~~_ withdrawn?~~_ Decision due by_,/_/_ made_,/~_ filed TC~~_ mailed~~_ Sse related cases lawsuits ~ other I ~, r ,~ ,rn ~; r r 'J ADDENDiJM Applicant (Gallagher) is APPEALING issuance of Building Permit No. 564-98 as amended 3/29/99, by the Building Commissioner, under Nantucket Zoning Bylaw §139-31. Applicant alleges that said Building Permit was issued in error as the new single-family dwelling being constructed upon the Locus in the current location is said to be in violation of Nantucket Zoning Bylaw §139-16A (Intensity Regulations - frontage and front yard setback), §139-18 (Parking Requirements), and §139-20.1 B(2)(e) (Curb Cut Requirements). It is said that the owners of the property have indicated that Douglas Way is the legal frontage, which has subminimum frontage with no access or parking area shown upon the plan submitted to the Building Department on which issuance of said amended Building Permit was based upon. In addition, said structure would arguably be sited within the required 35-foot front yard setback area. Applicant is further asking the Board to make a finding that the front yard setback is to be measured from the frontage from which access must also be made, without Variance relief having been issued by this Board, as stated in §139-20.1 B(2)(e). The Lot was created by ANR plan filed with the Planning Board that indicated that Eel Point Road was the legal frontage of the property using frontage averaging to create the subdivision. ~ Q €a~ Z 1 ~~~~~ ~~. ~~i C) i .I I ~ ~ €~; . ~ ~ .~ Z ~~~ ~ ~ ~ y ~ ~ ~~~ i i Z Z I )~ i C~ ~~ c ~ •~N.2 3 J '1. 4 ~ C ~~ J Q ~ 2A ~\ ~ I ~ ~ i i 1 . \\, J' ~ ' s ~ a o~` ~( ~ ~ I t I ~~~ , yn~ ~ ~./ V ~ 9 ~~ ~iDD ~ ~ b W . „unt ~ ~ ? `a1'~I~vi ti a ~~x~i g N ~~~ ~~~ a C N N~Q< ~~~1~~ W O ~ - ~ z y ~ ?? 4{ FO ~ ~ 2 m ~ O ~ '~ o E fi fi ~ o ~ s s <' ~ ~, ~ ~~~; o~~ ~ ~ ~ m =ao~ ~~~ ND/gT8 ,,- ., ~ ~ < ) 1 1 ,O~ ~ ~ o. r 1 ~ _.~ ~ION3d r-090LfI Nrld'0'7 1 o~' a S I ,O r 1 t/ g~P~ ~ ASK E S $ ti a ~. ~ - _ D1~NI ~ ,~ ~/' pry' ;~ , i h ~ ~~ ~ ~• I p ,i V ~ 1 I 1) 1 i A ~• 1 A ~ 1 ~ A ~ 1 b~ 1 ~ V h' 1 , ~~ AO . . ~ ;/ wwv A ^, 1 ' _ -' - 11 II lJ'~v 11 ~I 11 1, h II • ~~ i J V 52 25 ~ ~ ~d ^ K vS • ' W 1 1 ry ~ ~ gXQ ~~~F 7 ~~ pp O~~~K ~~~~~ ~ <~ ~~ u g ~~ q ~ ~ o H N ~J ~ O~Z J S~~ E ~ O{ ~ ~~~ _ ~ $ 0 N ZS 7~ ~}~7 ~~ ~~ F' _~ N it ~ W ~~~~ g 1 r. h=~~ of ~+~ : ~~ - H ~}. ~pE) (vR~R'Ei~s RpAp W ~o Z N m Z k' p ~~ U ~.{ N ,_ = J `~'~i ^ i~ ^ "` ~~ ~ ~1 i .. ,. _., ~pROP 1~~~.~~C~p _ ,, . n , ~ ~. R v -~ J g~ ri a X N a a ~ ~1 1 ,9 t'0 M O 0 h~ O h O N s H O M O "O u N~ ~e ~ . ~. w~ ~ ~~ W a ~s w m ~e ~~ ~~ 4 OI n V • S i <~ n ~ ~- ~~ i ~~ Zi yaF o % ,. ,~~--- ..,'~S, ,~ f-• C~ ~ 1 0.70 i ~ ~ ~ - U U w oWc ~~ .0 0 ~~ I 0 o <; ~J Z ~ Z~ j~ W ~~ 2 2 ~ ~ ,~ 1 < ~ 1 Nag ~S„ o~n ~i~ s~Jp h UZ~^a N ~. <~on ~~~ ~ ~~ag ~~~~ v rc~~ ~~ ~_~~Z~ FW~#O ~g~~ n °~~ oz#~$ ~~~~~ ~~a d~~ =~o ~ ~~;~~ m 5~ a~m~~ ~o='~ N = ~ gNk'~ N~~~ ~~~ ~ ~=o~ ~ ~ 2~ m ~~~~ N b ~~~~o N < p = N J < G 2 0 N ~~ 3 a° ~+ g `.~ < n ~ N Cl tN ~ w N Vu`1 V< .~ ~°~~ •Ne:~~°u ~~ u~a~~~ at. )r_yp/ ~" p N W N N ;~~~j m~~ ~~ g~~ ~~~ ~ .. .. y~~ N W ~,/ y q ~ O h ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ QQ X , V O ~ ~ O ~ LI s~,h O ~O g ~j ^+ ~ O ~ W~~h ~•' ~ ~ ~ n ^V ~. M ^ ~ ~ 2 $ ~ ~ ~ ~/1 _ _ 8 A 0 A 1 ,9L'0 ..1 1 eo 0 } ~ Z 4 i ~ O F 0~ _ ~a a 0 u~ 0 a ~' u° _ ., ~ry ~ r ~ J2 .~ ~ 1 ,~ r \ `~ FF~ p°/Nr _ R°'40 MAP: PARCEL: zoNING: LUG ~ ~' ~, MIN. LOT SIZE: SO,~m SQ FT. ~ MIN. FRONTAGE: 15m FT. ~ FRONT YARD SETBACK: 35 FT. ~ ~ ~ ~ REAR ~ SIDE SETBACK: 15 FT. ~ ~ MAX. CsROUND G01/ER RATIO: 4~o i ~ PROPOSED CsROI,iND CO~/ERACsE: ~ ~ ~ r i ~ i ~ i ~ i i ~ r i i ~ i ~ i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ r / ~ ~ r i ~ i ~ ~ ~ i ~ i ~ i ~ ~ ~ i ~ i ~ i t J 1' ~ / ~ / ~ ~, 1 / % 1 ~ I ~5 ~ ~ ~ \~ -i ~ rS ~\- ~\ t no word ~d tha ~m ~~;ur ~~ed s wtth~«t ~~'0~ ,,r i ~' ,_~.._^- ~-.• _ ~ -- ;; _ ~^ I ~' !~ ~ 'I'~, II ~ y~ L_--- 1 1 ~~ ,, ~, 1 ~ `'G ~ ~ 1 ` ~, ~~, ~~ ~1 ~~~, 1~ ~ _ :. ~ ,~,o ~, ~r z~ ~ rr .~~ I RECEI APPLI yION WILL NO B • ~ ~~` ~~ ~u, I PLICATION NUMBER DEEM OMP-LET~_U[~lT 1L' . ! 3 APPLICATION FOR REVIEWED- BY BUILDING PLAN EXAMINATION AND INSPECTOR ~ l BUILDING PERMIT ,4, and 5 IMPORTANT - Appllunt to compiata all ms In tilactlons: 1,2,3 SIL ~~ i !~/A~lN~ u r~ I~ ~ OWNERS NAME: ' Last First Middle Initial LOCATION ~ nDU4 ~ ~4S ~~ ~} OF BUILDING No. street village rj4 !~ ~ ~~ Assessor's Map No. .3 T Assessor's Parcel No. 2. TYPE AND COST OF BUILDING -All applicants complete Parts A-D A. TYPE OF IMPROVEMENT O. PROPOSED USE - (For "Demolition" most rece nt use) ^ New Building Residential Detail scope of work by ik~or 8 provide the ^ Addition (If residential, enter number ^ One Family square footage. of new housing units added, ^ Two or more family -Enter ~ •. if any, in Part D, 13) ^ Alteration (See 2 above) ~ h number of untils ^ Repair, replacement ^ Transient Hotel, Motel or , ~ ~ H ~S / ~~/ t ^Demolition (If multifamily residential, dormitory; or INTERVAL enter number of units in OWNERSHIP -enter number of units C l~K~ building in Part D, 13) ^ Garage ^ Moving (relocation) ^ Carport ^ Foundation only B. OWNERSHIP ^ Other -Specify O Private (individual, corporation, nonprofit Institution, etc.) ^ Public• (Federal, State, or local government) omit cents E. DIMENSIONS C. COST Dimensions (New) of Dimensions of Structure Cost of: a $ Dwelling or Addition: Additional Structures: . Electrical b No. of Stories: Garage: . Plumbin c First Floor Area: Accessory Bldg. g . Heatin d Second Floor Area: Swimming Pool: g . Other e Third Floor Area: Other. . TAL COST OF IMPROVEMENT Total Floor Area: TO STIMATE ' Full Cellar Area: S E BUILDING INSPECTOR 3. SELECTED CHARACTERISTICS O F BUILDING For new buildings and additions, complete Parts E-N for Demolition, complete onl Part i., for all others skip to 4. F. PRINCIPLE TYPE OF FRAME H. TYPE OF SEWAGE DISPOSAL K. ACCESSORY HEAT SOURCE No. of fireplaces ^ Masonry (wall bearing) ^ Public or private company No. of Wood Stoves ^ Wood frame ^ Private (septic tank, etc.) No. of Coal Stoves ^ Structural steel Solar Collector ^ Reinforced concrete I. TYPE OF WATER SUPPLY Other: ^ Other -Specify ^ Public or private company L. SMOKE DETECTORS O Private (well, cistern) No. of Dectectors Type (Battery or AC) G. PRINCIPLE TYPE OF HEATING J. SPECIAL CHARACTERISTICS See plan for Location ^ Gas ^ Air Conditioning ^ Oil ^ Heat Pump M. RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS ONLY ^ Electricity ^ Central Vacuum Number of Bedrooms ^ Coal ^ Other Number of Bathrooms ^ Other -Specify Full Partial 3. Continued N. ENERGY CONSERVATION Type Thickness R Value Foundation or Floor insulation - WaII Insulation Ceiling or Root Insulation Window Glazing: Insulated Glass Doubte Glass Storm Doors: Insulated Yes No Weatherstripped: Yes No Percentage of Window Area to Wall Area: Maximum BTU loss per hour of structure: . (Do not fill in if % of window to wall area is less than 20%) O. STRUCTURAL CHARACTERISTICS OF BUILDING Applicant is required to submit complete structural framing planswith application due to the complexity of the structure, if the following information is insufficient for proper plan review. Foundation Footing size: Footing reinforcing: Wall material: Wall thickness: gw A' (~ Wall height Wall reinforcing: Pier or column size: Pier or column spacing: Pier or column footing size: Pier lumn reinforcing: No. of crawl space vents: Crawl space• Full ^ Partial FRAMING: Main Carrying members: Size: First Floor Framing Joist size: ~~Z Support Spacing: Maximum Span: Maximum Spacing: Second Floor Framing Joist size: Maximum Span: Maximum Spacing: Gelling Framing Joist size: Maximum Span: Maximum Spacing: Roof Framing Rafter size: Maximum Span: Maximum Spacing: Roof Truss Applicant must submit design calculations for all wood trusses stamped by a Registered Profession Engineer. INTERIOR FINISH Walls Floors Ceiling Bedrooms Living Room Family Room Dlning Room Bathroom Utility Room Special-(specify) -_ ._ - Attic Cellar EXTERIOR FINISH Wall Material I Roof Material Qi~ ~~a~ ~1~~ ~ Roof Type NOTES AND DATE (For Department Use) FEE CALCUALTIONS 4. ZONING COMPLIANCE To b. compNtad by all appllcanb Applicant is required to submit a registered plot plan with application, showing location of all structures. Zoning District: Total Land Area: Frontage on Street: Plan Book No. and Page: Date Lot Purchased: SUBDIVISION INFORMATION Name of Owner: Date of Plan Approval: Lot No. Land Court Plan No. Certificate No. Name of Previous Owner: Type of Approval: ANR AR Planning Board File No. Is the Subdivision subject to a Covenant: YES NO Is a Release required: YES NO Has Plan been filed with the Registry of Deeds? YES NO If YES: Plan Book and Page No. Date DIMENSIONS Dlstancefirom-Property Lines-FRONT REAR LEFT RIGHT Distance between Principal and Secondary Dwellin~ (12tt. minimum.) Height of structure above finish grade: N~ E S w Number of off-street parkig spaces: Enclosed On-site GROUND COVER Principal Dwelling: Secondary Dwelling: Total: SF. Addition: Allowable: ~• Garage: Accessory Building: Swimming Pool: Other: MISCELLANEOUS Was a request to "Determing Applicability of the Wetland Protection Act" filed with the Nantucket Conservation Committee? YES tf answered YES, inclde "Order of Conditions" with application. What date was the "Order of Conditions" with application. What date was the "Order of Conditions" filed with the Registry of Deeds? Is the property located withing a Flood Hazard district? YES NO Was a Variance or Special Permit granted by the Board of Apeals? YES NO If answered YES, what date was the decision filed with the Town Clerk? FOR BUILDING DEPARTMENT USE ONLY Minimum Lot Size: . Frontage on Street: _ Front Yard: Additional Comments: NO Ground Cover Ratio: _ Side and Rear Setback: Date: ~ APPROVED BY: Zoning Officer TIME SHARING INFORMATION Is there a declaration of Covenants and Restrictions of Interval Ownership noted on your Title or Deed? Yes No /fin !~ ~~ S. IDENTIFICATION - To be completed b al ppllcants ~ 0 _ - ~ ~p Name Mialing address -Number, street, city, and State Zip Code Telephone No. t. Owner or Lessee 2 Builder's License General Contractor ~ 3. Date Contractor Signature 4. Architect or Engineer I hereby certify that the proposed work is authorized by the owner of record and that I have been authorized by the owner to make this application as his authorized agent and we agree to conform to all applicable laws of this jurisdiction. Signature f licant Address ~~~~~3 / ,~~z7 21~~ %/ ~ DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE 6. PLA IEW RECORD -For Ofec~ ua Plans R Required HISTORIC DISTRICS-COMMISSION •k, _ Z -Cj - - ~ - ~ ` - SEPTIC SEWER WATER WELL COMPLETION REPORT CONSERVATION COMMISSION BOARD OF APPEALS SECONDARY DWELLING APPROVAL (Planning Board) FIRE CHIEF OVER-THE-ROAD (Board of Selectmen) RELEASE FORM (Planning Board) ROAD OPENING PERMIT (DPW) PLUMBING ELECTRICAL Ar"Qi1JTBr.t ~ ' 3 0? {>,-:pru~jal Date ___-~-- , Type - • - Building Otficiai 7. VALIDATION Building Permit number Building Permit issued Date of Reissuance Building Permit Fee Date of Issuance of Certificate of Occupancy FOR DEPARTMENT USE ONLY Use Group - Fire Grading Live Loading _ Occupancy Load Census No Approved by: Building Inspector . W W ~~ ~~ NZ Qa W o Q ° 0 ~~ ~~ O u~u ~~~~ T 4 ~ V ~- J ~~ V > ~ ;'~~. -.:~~ o~ • ~ ~- v U N .nv~ Q 3t ~ W ~ ~ O ~ ~` ~ •- J ~ ~~ ~ o -- = j ~ ~ X ~ ~ •~ d O v u ° ~ w ~ 0 f- Q _. _ H W w~ ~ F- ~ U O H Z ~ ~ a N ~ ~ O ~ Z H a Q H °w a 0 w Q 0 J O=O~ Q p Z U ~_Zo~ ~a~w a~wo Q~W..G.V ~aZz O~Z~ W "' ~~Wm wOzQ W ~ Z ~ Z 1- ~ f- o-z~, ~oa~ ~o~.~v a ~=0c~n OHF-Q J ~ ~ W QZ~c N ~~oa W v ~ ~ ~ W Y U aaH ~n a O ~~'~Z w 0 ZZZo a~~~ W Um~W Q = N O~U~ Z ~ . Z Q W J Z Z W W ~ = Z ~ ~ ~.-.pOm ~ ~ tW- ~ ~" U aW }a ZZ o- H Q ~~ a~ a ~Q O~ Z ~,,, ~ m ww ~~ O~ a~ ~Q D ~ wW ~z wz mw Jm Z <t N az 0 UV O W a OZ Wp Q W U~ H U ~w W ~ U -~ QQ oCp Q W ~O ~ w~ ~ =J W ~ ~ a°C. wV W ~O = ~ ~ F- ~ Z ~. ~ o w0 V ~? W ZO ~ ~v O oz ~ V ~w ~ ~ ~p Z za O V ~o Q ~y Z o- QOW W Z W m J ~WU ~ Via mva m Qo} u~ _ (~ Z ~ W W ~ N (~ ~~~ ~ Haua. E.- r------~. ~._, ~ ,, ~v~~ -, ~~ - - . I T 1998 ~ A ~ c ..: RECEIVE - l ~~ APPLICA WILL NOT 6E ;:, BUILDING APPLICATION NUMBER DEEMED TE UNTIL ~ / 9 REVIEWE TLDTR~ - APPUt:I-TION FoR / PLAN EXAMINATION AND INSPECTOR / /7 ~ - BUILOINti PERMIT IMPORTANT - Ap nt to compl~ta all Items in S~ctlons: 1,2,3,4, and S ~ ~ ~ OWNERS NAME: ' LOCATION Last First Middle Initial ~ ~ ~~i~ H/h ~ BUILDING No. Street village s4 Assessor's Map No. ~ Assessor's Parcet No. 2. TYPE AND COST OF BUILDING -All applicants complete Parts A-D A. TYPE OF IMPROVEMENT D. PROPOSED USE - (For "Demolition" most recent use) N ew Building Residential Detail scope of work by floor & provide fhe /^ Addition (If residential, enter number Leone Family square footage' .. of new housing units added, J/ti\ if any, in Part D, 13) ^ Two or more family -Enter ^ Alteration (See 2 above) number of untils ^ Repair, replacement ^ Transient Hotel, Motel or demolition (If multifamily residential, dormitory; or INTERVAL . enter number of units in OWNERSHIP -enter number of units building in Part D, 13) ^ Garage ^ Moving (relocation) ^ Foundation only ^ Carport ERSHIP ^ Other -Specify /~ ivate (individual, corporation, nonprofit institution, etc.) O Public (Federal, State, or local government) omit cents E. DIMENSIONS C. COST Dimensions (New) of Dimensions of Cost of: a. Structure $ Dwelling or Addition: Additional Structures: b. Electrical No. of Stories: ~ Garage: Plumbing c S y f First Floor Area: Accessory B . Heating d Second Floor Area: ~S~T ~~ Swimming I: . Other - e Third Floor Area: ~L- Other: _ . TOTAL COST OF IMPROVEMENT ~ ~~ o7 S~ Total Floor Area: 3? ECTOR'S ESTIMATE C Full Cellar Area: ~ ~/~ ~~ BUILDING INSP 3. SELECTED CHARACTERISTICS O F BUILDING For new buildings and additions, complete Pans E-N for Demolition, complete onl Part 1., for all others skip to 4. F. PRINCIPLE TYPE OF FRAME H. TYPE OF SEWAGE DISPOSAL K. ACCESSORY HEAT SOURCE No. of fireplaces 7 -- ^ Masonry (wall bearing) ^ Public or private company No. of Wood Stoves Wood frame rivate (septic tank, etc.) No. of Coal Stoves ^ Structural steel Solar Collector ^ Reinforced concrete 1. TYPE OF WATER SUPPLY Other; ^ Other • Specify ^ Public or private company rivate (well, cistern) L. SMOKE DETECTORS " No. of Dectectors C Type (Battery or AC) ~G G. PRINCIPLE TYPE OF HEATING SPECIAL CHARACTERISTICS J Gas . i See plan for Location ng ^ Air Condition ^ Oil ^ Heat Pump M. RESIDENTIAL BUILDIN S ONLY ^ Electricity ^ Central Vac Number of Bedrooms ^ Coal ^ Other 3 Number of Bathrooms ^ Other -Specify Full / Partial Z 3. Continued _, C ~ ~ o+.~! N. ENERGY CONSERVATION Type Thickness R Value Foundation or Floor insulation Wall Insulation Ceiling or Roof Insulation Window Glazing: Insulated Glass Double Glass Storm Doors: Insulated Yes No Weatherstripped: Yes No Percentage of Window Area to Wall Area: Maximum BTU loss per hour of structure: . (Do not fill in if ~ of window to wall area is less than 2096) O. STRUCTURAL CHARACTERISTICS OF BUILDING Applicant is required to submit complete structural framing plans with application due to the complexity of the structure, if the following information is insufficient for proper plan review. Foundation '~ ~ ~' ~' l '~ Footing reinforcing: Footing size: ~ X q Wall material: ~'`~ Wall thickness: - ld i , Wall height 8~ 9 Wall reinforcing: Pier or column size: ~ ~ Pier or column spacing: Pier or column footing size: ~ Pier or column r 'nforcing: No. of crawl space vents: Crawl spaces' " II ^ Partial FRAMING: Main Carrying members: Size: Support Spacin~; lG ~~~G ~-/L~~'~~'I Joist size: , X~l ~ a First Floor Framin an: ~9~ Ma m S im i i S g x u p x mum ng: pac /v / Second Floor Framing Joist size:! ~ ~ Maximum Span: ~~ I v~aximum Spacing: ~ ~ ~~ ~ Gelling Framing Joist size: 7Kti Maximum Span: ~~Maximum Spacing: G i '/ Roof Framing Rafter size: 1...~5~ Maximum Span: ~ Maximum Spacing: G fOG Roof Truss Applicant must submit design calculations for all wood trusses stamped by a Registered Profession Engineer. FloorsCeiling INTERIOR FINISH Wal l ~ Bedrooms Uving Room ~' ~' ~~ Family Room /~ N ~~ ~~ Olning Room ie ~~ ~~ ~ ~ Bathroom ~ + ~ ~ / Utility Room Special (specify) _ __ Attic ~~ _ Cellar " ~OH~X L.OH~ EXTERIOR FINIS ~/_/ /r % ~~ h ~ ~Q Wall Material Root Material ~~ Roof Type NOTES AND DATE (For Department Use) FEE CALCUALTIONS .3 ~ ~ ,~ Y . /Y £3 ~ 4. ZONING COMPLIANCE 7o t>• wmpNt~d by all applk:ants ~ Applicant is required to submit a registered plot plan with application, showing location of all structures. Zoning District: / 1Total Land Area: ~03~ ~0~ Frontage on Streer• l33•G 9 ~ b-o 'S'CG /Ql!-•Ol4s A of No. /3 flan Book No. and Page: / `Land Court f Ian No. L-~~% 3 d~~ Date Lot Purchased: ~ ~ ~ r Certificate No. Name of Previous nwnwr ~' ~Q~ Off SUBDIVISION INFORMATION~~ ~ ~~~~ Name of Owner: Oate of Plan Approval: Type of Approval: ANR AR Planning Board File No. ~8 Z Is the Subdivision subject to a Covenant: YES NO ~._ Is a Release required: YES NO ~~ Has Plan been filed with the Registry of Deeds? YES ~ NO If YES: Plan Book and Page No. ate fta ~2'j•~ ~ Q~ DIMENSIONS ~ / d I i~ Distance from Property Lines: FRONT ~'~ REAR SZo''o LEFT TIME SHARING INFORMATION Is there a declaration of Covenants and Restrictions of Interval Ownership noted on your Title or Deed? Yes No RIGHT 7i~ ~~ Distance between Principal and Secondary Dweliing~ N~'~ ~ (12f~. minim~m.) ~ ~~r Height of structure above finish grade: N Z9 ~~/ E ~ Sal _ W Number of off-street parkig spaces: Enclosed ~~~On-site GROUND COVER Principal Dwelling: 7~« Second; Addition Garage: Accessc Swimmi Other: Total: Z SF. Allowable: SF. MISCELLANEOUS Was a request to "Determing Applicability of the Wetland Protection Act" filed with the Nantucket Conservation Committee? YES ~t0--, If answered YES, incide "Order of Conditions" with application. What date was the "Order of Conditions" with application. What date was the "Order of Conditions" filed with the Registry of Deeds? Is the property located withing a Flood Hazard district? YES NO Was a Variance or Special Permit granted by the Board of Apeals? YES NO If answered YES, what date was the decision filed with the Town Clerk? FOR BUILDING DEPARTMENT USE ONLY Minimum Lot Size: Y-o~ o u o Frontage on Street: ~ b ~ Front Yard: 3 ~ Ground Cover Ratio: •y lO Side and Rear Setback: ~ ~ Additional Comments: Date: APPROVED BY: Zoning Officer 5t IDENTIFICATION - To b. completed b all applicants Name Mialing address -Number, street, city, and State Zip Code Telephone No. Cs7 v 4~' d ~- O Owner or Lessee :~ ,b~ - Zi-~3 - ZLo.3 J -/GZ 2. Builder's License General Contractor 3• ntr r t C Oate o ac o Signature a. i t }/G so or Arch tec Engineer Q ~ --OZf"f - Zi~-;~j ~' I hereby ce y that the proposed work is authorized by the owner of record and that I have been authorized by the owner to make this application as his authorized agent and we agree to conform to all applicable laws of this jurisdiction. Signature of plicant Address L ~ /~ Q DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE 6. PLAN REVIEW RECORD -For Ofnoe use Plans Review Required HISTORIC OISTRICS COMMISSION ~~G _cj SEPTIC o-J~t' ~(-/(o'S~ SEWER WATER WELL COMPLETION REPORT v lG 3 -/ ~' - S~ d~ f~u c{ ' CONSERVATION COMMISSION BOARD OF APPEALS SECONDARY DWELLING APPROVAL (Planning Board) FIRE CHIEF OVER-THE-ROAD (Board of Selectmen) RELEASE FORM (Planning Board) ROAD OPENING PERMIT (DPW) PLUMBING ELECTRICAL 7. VALIDATION Building !-~ / ~~ Permit number ~~p Building f~ ~ ~ ~~ ICj Permit issued Y " ~ r, L ~ FOR DEPARTMENT USE ONLY Use Group Fire Grading Live Loading Occupancy Load Census No. ~~~ Date of Reissuance Building Permit Fee ~yB3 Date of Issuance of Certificate of Occupancy Approved by: Building Inspector ~~ TOWN OF NANTUCKET ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS - - LIST OF PARTIES IN INTER~EaST IN THE MATTER OF THE PETITION OF rROrERTY OWNER:...~.~-Q~Q4.~?.......~.........~ ................ ....................... MAILING ADDRESS :........................................................................................ PROPERTY LOCATION:........5 .................. .................w.......1.................... ASSESSORS Mp,p/pARCEL:...........0 0.3.9 -0.5.~ ...................................... SUBMITTED BY :............................................................................................... SEE ATTACHED PAGES 1 certify that the foregoing is a list of persons who are owners of abutting propem~, o~~-ners of land directly opposite on any public or private street or way; and abutters of the abutters and all other land o~~ners «~ithin three hundred feet of the property line of owner's property, all as they appear on the most recent applicable tax list. (M.G.L. c. 40A, Section 11 Zoning Code Chapter 139. Section 139-29D (2) ). ....................................... DATE ............................................. SSOR'S OFFICE TOWN OF NANTUCKET 04/21/99 TOWN OF NANTUCKET 15:41:.?6 OWNER'S MAILING ADDRESS LIST Map Block Lot Owner's/Co-Owner's Name Mailing Address/City State Zip 0039 00102 GALLAGHER RICHARD A & ANNE E C721 CEDAR ST I `"' WALPOLE MA 02081 0039 0010 POTTER ELIZABETH F ETAL TRS 0075 STATE ST C/0 WARNER & STACKPOLE BOSTON MA 02109 0039 0011 REGAN DIANA M 0055 CIRCLE DR IRVINGTON NY 10533 0039 0008 *NANTUCKET TOWN OF 0016 BROAD ST NANTUCKET MA 02554 0039 0053 BONAFAIR THOMAS H & CYNTHIA J 10136 MASTERS DR NE ALBUQUERQUE NM 87111 0032 0062 HADDON WILLIAM V PO BOX 247 NANTUCKET MA 02554 0032 0063 HADDON WILLIAM V PO BOX 247 NANTUCKET MA 02554 0032 0055 ZODDA MARIA L 16 STORYBROOK ROAD AMHERST NH 03031-2604 0032 00552 NEFF LINDA D 5 WEST 86TH STREET NEW YORK NY 10024 0039 0052 GLICK ADAM & SCRUTON DENISE 155 EAST 72ND ST # 13-B NEW YORK NY 10021 0040 0081 WILSON WARREN A & SUSAN A 0034 ROCKVILLE AVE LEXINGTON MA 02420 0040 00441 *FRITZ DAIN T & HILLARY J 14 MOSS LEDGE LN WESTPORT CT 06880 0040 0044 HADDON WILLIAM V & ASSOC PO BOX 247 NANTUCKET MA 02554 0040 0042 EVERETT RICHARD M III & CORDEL 0115 PATTON AVE PRINCETON NJ 08540 0040 0043 UPTON JOSEPH III & LINDA M 0024 FAIRWAY RD BROOKLINE MA 02445 0040 0040 NEWMAN MARSHALL F TRS 84 STATE STREET BCD TRUST BOSTON MA 02109 0040 0039 BAMBER RONALD K PO BOX 26 NANTUCKET MA 02554 _ / 0040 0032 v VERETT RICHARD M III & CORDEL 0115 PATTON AVE lll ~~~ PRINCETON NJ 08540 NUMBER OF RECORDS = 18 ~ ~/ ~ ^ 1 C~ Ov1v1 Property Location 0012 DOUGLAS WY 0014 DOUGLAS WY 0010 GREENLEAF RD 0000 EEL POINT RD 0032 EEL POINT RD 0003 HUCKLEBERRY LN 0006 DIONIS BEACH RD 0003 DIONIS BEACH RD 0001 DIONIS BEACH ~~ 0031 EEL POINT RD 0029 EEL POINT RD 0030 EEL POINT RD 0028 EEL POINT RD 0008 BISHOPS RISE 0028 SWIFT ROCK kD 0020 SWIFT ROCK RD 0016 SWIFT ROCK RD 0020 BISHOPS RISE PAGE 1 MUAS750 9.2 S ea~ ~~ 1« fslwl . itirS~.% . 3Y-tA t s "y ~~ ,.-i ;. 1 ~~ t-~ N (~ 000 2 a Q ' 9 .~~ 3z-2o 0 3 ~i 8 ~.= y4•~• s to-p st-s 0 ``:. Lin ~;~ s 1O~! .~ ~ ~~ ; \ ly . ~ 1 t 1 H %~ /~ ~~ •~` ~ `~ „- ~ ` P . LsA u~ 4 d .~ ,; // `, { , i ; t /~ // 33 ` . ~ pal ¢ YT / % - to gyp.. 1 to I.OA I.aA !t Il ~ / ~ \ . ; /~ f ~ ~ M 1 ~/ / , ~. ~~ 1S I.IA a.lA ~~ 0 ~ yl-,~a ~ . ~! I ~ a.a~A ~ ~` a a w , ~! ~z , ~~ LIA I/ ~~ .,•, pu I.A , ~? . h ®Is ~ yo.l a/ > `~ • ' / ~. i •1 q~ Z~ J/c. i a. d ~ O.O A 11 _ 1 a , t 1 ~ si , ~ f ~ ,. , . 1/ r ~ ~ ~ r w 11 b ~ v ~ ye•4 ~ n.sA a: ~ - ~.' ~ ~ ~ -}- I ' ~, - 17 w I. t A 10.11 - M ~_ ~ - I ~ *-r.l i 1a t t ' ~ LM _ .. ~. 11.1A Air,- 1` J ~_ !' :: A 1 ~ ~ I.{A 1• 1t A ~ tT N SI A ~' ~,J . LTA 61A a. 0 A , 11 t A 1.1A ~ L i >• 1.OA 40 t u~1.A1Ns 1A2 ae ~.N i. iA S b -~ ,10_~ w . 1. It ~ / I i /k f i IIG6 M.Y ~j A Z ` Rit ' - ~ AM q' .. I 1~R ~xt 1 ~.s ~ ~°v' ' :CMOPIELO BROTHER=~ INC. C7~ rROft.SS1011A1 tXgl~f • alceKTCl~cs SAIp ~Y~Y=t10R3 . h SHEET INDEX ~ l1a st0[RAl EIT~ MAMTYCNtT. a>,ASS. ps W 2 vOjl F ~ }{' .. v o l A' 1~Ptt~ ,„ °` .~~ ~r+~" ~~~~ ~ o „/ ~~ ..~~ ; t . . n '1. f ~.' i00 7 0001!7 i ADAM! $ hL ~~ r' s tCIWA010 . • A 19 ,• ~ 10 !S 2~ y AO rl 4 Y tl b r, - ~/ : tJ :.. ,.AwMw, -.'h. ;~ ~'.z" , ,~ w~ c i 1'~; ''L'y ' ~ ~ - ~ ~ ~` i aS r r F ~ ~ . .d c. i . - ~. ..s. +~ ~-•~'34 ' - t * ;. 4w i