HomeMy WebLinkAbout072-00TOWN OF NANTUCKET
BOARD OF APPEALS
NANTUCKET, MASSACHUSETTS 02554
Date: September 18 ~ 20 00
To: Parties in Interest and. Others concerned with the
Decision of the BOARD OF APPEALS in the Application of the
following:
Application No.:_ 072-00
Owner/Applicant: WALTER J. GLOWACKI & SONS, INC., ET AL
Enclosed is the Decision of the BOARD OF APPEALS which has
this day been filed in the office of the Nantucket Town
Clerk.
An Appeal from this Decision may be taken pursuant to
Section 17 of Chapter 40A, Massachusetts General Laws.
Any action appealing the Decision must be brought by
filing an complaint in court within TWENTY (20) days after
this day's date. Notice of the action with a copy of the
complaint and certified copy of the Decision must be given
to the Town Clerk so as to be received within such TWENTY
(20) days.
Q~ Q
D. leil P rent, Vi e- Chairman
cc: Town Clerk
Planning Board
Building Commissioner
PLEASE NOTE: MOST SPECIAL PERMITS AND VARIANCES HAVE A TIME
LIMIT AND WILL EXPIRE IF NOT ACTED UPON ACCORDING~TO NANTUCKET
ZONING BY-LAW §139-30I (SPECIAL PERMITS); §139-32I (VARIANCES)
ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE CALL THE NANTUCKET ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS.
NANTUCKET ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
37 Washington Street
Nantucket, Massachusetts 02554
Assessor's Map 42.2.3, Parcel 35 Plan Book 24, Page 33
53 Washington Street Deed, Book 288, Page 230
Residential-Commercial
DECISION:
1. At a public hearing of the Nantucket Zoning Board of
Appeals, on Friday, September 8, 2000, at 1:00 P.M., in the
Conference Room, in the Town Annex Building, 37 Washington
Street, Nantucket, Massachusetts, the Board made the following
decision on the application of WALTER J. GLOWACKI & SONS, INC.,
WALTER J. GLOWACKI, DAVID D. GLOWACKI, GREG W. GLOWACKI and KIM
GLOWACKI, c/o Reade, Gullicksen, Hanley & Gifford, LLP, Post
Office Box 2669, Nantucket, Massachusetts 02584, File No. 072-00:
2. The applicants are seeking relief by SPECIAL PERMIT
under Nantucket Zoning By-law §139-33.A (alteration or expansion
of a pre-existing, nonconforming structure or use) to validate
the demolition and reconstruction of the primary single-family
dwelling upon the subject property (the "Locus") without change
in its prior dimensions, including side yard setback intrusion.
In the alternative, the applicants seek relief by VARIANCE from
the provisions of Zoning By-law §139-16A, to authorize
reconstruction of the primary dwelling with side yard setback of
about 4.3 feet from the northwesterly side lot line, being the
location of the present foundation, with minimum side yard
setback in this zoning district being five feet. In addition,
the applicants seek relief by SPECIAL PERMIT under Zoning By-law
§139-33.E(2)(a), to increase the permitted ground cover to enable
reconstruction of the dwelling with ground cover of about 893
square feet, for a total ground cover computed in accordance with
the Zoning By-law of about 1,179 square feet, for a ground cover
ratio of about 37.80; maximum ground cover ratio in this zoning
district for an undersized lot of record is 300, or about 935
square feet, the area of the Locus being about 3,117 square feet.
Further, the applicants seek relief by SPECIAL PERMIT under
Zoning By-law §139-18.B(2) to reduce the number of required on-
site parking spaces from two to one (with an additional space to
be provided in a "stacked" manner). The Locus is nonconforming
as to lot area, containing about 3,117 square feet in a zoning
district which requires minimum lot area of 5,000 square feet; as
to side and rear yard setbacks, with the foundation of the
principal dwelling under construction being sited about 4.3 feet
at its closest point from the northwesterly side yard lot line,
with a shed structure being sited about 2.52 feet at its closest
point from. the northwesterly side yard lot line, and with a
secondary dwelling being sited at about 2.98 feet at its closest
point from the southeasterly side yard lot line and about 1.31
feet at its closest point from the rear lot line, with the
1
minimum side and rear yard setback required in this zoning
district being five feet; and as to parking, with there being
only one conforming parking space provided, with two spaces being
required for the two dwellings upon the Locus. The Locus is
situated at 53 WASHINGTON STREET, Assessor's Map 42.2.3, Parcel
35, is shown upon plan recorded with Nantucket Deeds in Plan Book
24, Page 33, and is situated in a Residential-Commercial zoning
district.
3. Our decision is based upon the application and
accompanying materials, and representations and testimony
received at our public hearing. The Planning Board
recommendation was unfavorable. One letter from an abutted,
expressing concern about the granting of variance relief, was
received by the Board of Appeals, and the Building Commissioner
spoke in favor of the granting of relief; no other support nor
opposition, apart from the applicants' presentation, was received
at the public hearing.
4. As presented by the applicants, the Locus was improved
with three buildings: a primary dwelling with ground cover of
about 893 square feet, a secondary dwelling with ground cover of
about 286 square feet, and a shed with ground cover of about 103
square feet. (The shed is no longer required to be included in
the calculation of ground cover, by virtue of the adoption of
Article 29 of the 1999 Annual Town Meeting.) Because of the
dilapidated condition of the primary dwelling, the applicants
determined to proceed with its demolition and replacement with a
new dwelling having exactly the same location and dimensions,
horizontal and vertical, as the old structure. They proceeded to
obtain approval from the Nantucket Historic District Commission
("HDC") and a Determination of Applicability from the Nantucket
Conservation Commission that the project would not require the
filing of a Notice of Intent under state and local wetlands
regulations, and obtained two building permits, each issued by
the Nantucket Building Department on April 1, 1999. Permit No.
302-99 authorized the demolition of the old dwelling, and Permit
No. 303-99 authorized the construction of the replacement
dwelling. The applicants represented at the public hearing that
they proceeded in good faith, unaware of any need for zoning
relief or any further permits and assuming that the issuance of
the building permits confirmed the applicants' authority to
proceed with the work.
5. In the autumn of 1999, the applicants proceeded to
demolish the old dwelling. In the winter of 1999-2000, they
proceeded to install a poured concrete foundation in the exact
location, and with the same dimensions, as the old structure.
However, when the foundation was inspected by the Building
Department on or about March 10, 2000, the issue of need for
zoning relief was for the first time raised by the Building
Department. On March 28, 2000, the Building Commissioner issued
a letter, purporting to revoke Permit No. 303-99 and ordering the
immediate cessation of all construction upon the site. This
2
letter also raised various other non-zoning issues, all of which
have been addressed by the applicants. This application has been
brought in order to address the need for zoning relief as
suggested in the March 28 letter.
6. As described in Paragraphs 2 and 4, the old dwelling
was nonconforming dimensionally as to side yard setback, with the
ground cover upon the lot being in excess of the 30% permitted
for an undersized lot of record, and with the stacked parking
arrangement resulting in only one valid, conforming parking space
although as a practical matter two spaces were provided. The
foundation for the new dwelling having been placed identically to
the location of the old dwelling, the new dwelling would have
exactly the same nonconformities as the old one. The applicants
contend that, if they had properly applied to the Board of
Appeals for relief to permit their project before undertaking the
demolition of the old dwelling, they could have been granted a
special permit under Zoning By-law X139-33.A, for the demolition
and reconstruction of their existing dwelling, and that the Board
of Appeals could consider their present application as one for
that same relief. This overlooks the facts that (a) the
demolition has now already occurred, and there is now no
nonconforming structure to modify, and (b) the Board of Appeals
has in other cases taken the position that such demolition and
reconstruction cannot be done without a variance. (If the
applicants had had this position in mind when planning their
project, they might have been able to accomplish it by preserving
enough of the original structure so that the project could have
been considered an alteration, requiring only special permit
relief, not a variance.) Accordingly, the Board of Appeals
declined to consider the project, as it involves the side yard
setback issue, as a special permit, and determined that any
relief to be granted would have to be in the form of a variance.
7. As presented by the applicants, they understandably
thought that, having proceeded through the Building Department
and secured building permits, they had complied with all legal
requirements for their project. They aver that, considering that
the dimensions and use of their structure would be unchanged,
they did not realize that any zoning relief would be needed. At
the same time, the fact that the completed project will be
identical in both dimensions and use to the pre-existing,
nonconforming conditions upon the site leads inescapably to the
conclusion that the granting of the requested relief will have no
adverse impact upon :the neighborhood and generally upon the
interests protected by the Zoning By-law.
8. With regard to the side yard setback issue affecting
the foundation which the applicants have placed upon the Locus
(and which identically affected the demolished dwelling), the
Board of Appeals made the finding, by UNANIMOUS vote, that, owing
to circumstances relating to the topography of the Locus and the
structures thereon (consisting of the pre-existing location of
the dwelling and the placement of the existing foundation), and
3
especially affecting the Locus and not affecting generally the
zoning district in which the Locus is situated, a literal
enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning By-law would involve
substantial financial hardship to the applicants (in that the
removal of a portion of the poured concrete foundation which
already exists would be required), and that desirable relief may
be granted without substantial detriment to the public good and
without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent or
purpose of the Zoning By-law (for the reasons set forth in
Paragraph 7, above). Accordingly, by UNANIMOUS vote, the Board
of Appeals voted to GRANT relief by VARIANCE from the side yard
setback requirement of five feet to authorize the placement of
the_ existing foundation upon the Locus, about 4.3 feet at its
closest point from the northwesterly side yard lot line, and the
construction of a replacement dwelling thereon, subject to the
conditions set forth in Paragraph 11, below.
9. Since the proposed (and pre-existing, prior to
demolition) ground cover upon the Locus exceeds the 30o maximum
for a pre-existing lot of record with less than 5,000 square feet
of lot area, but is less than the 50o ground cover ratio
permitted in the Residential-Commercial zoning district in which
the Locus is situated, relief to permit the proposed ground cover
may be granted by Special Permit under Zoning By-law ~139-
33.B(2)(a), upon a finding that such increase in ground cover
shall not be substantially more detrimental to the neighborhood
than the existing nonconformity. Based upon the reasons set
forth in Paragraph 7, above, the Board of Appeals, by UNANIMOUS
vote, made this finding and GRANTED relief by SPECIAL PERMIT
under §139-33.E(2)(a), to permit ground cover of the structures
upon the Locus to be about 1,179 square feet, for a ground cover
ratio of about 37.80, subject to the conditions set forth in
Paragraph 11, below.
10. Under By-law X139-18.B(2), relief from parking
requirements in the Residential-Commercial zoning district may be
given by Special Permit, provided that the Special Permit
Granting Authority makes the findings that (a) the granting of
the relief is in harmony with the general purposes and intent of
the Zoning By-law, and (b) that compliance with the parking
requirements contained in X139-18 of the Zoning By-law would (i)
be physically impossible for the applicants to provide, (ii) have
a significant and adverse effect upon the scenic and historic
integrity of the neighborhood, or (iii) be contrary to sound
traffic and safety considerations. Based upon the reasons set
forth in Paragraph 7, above, and the fact that the provision of
more than one conforming parking space upon the Locus would be
physically impossible, the Board of Appeals, by UNANIMOUS vote,
made these findings and GRANTED relief by SPECIAL PERMIT under
§139-18.B(2), to waive one of the two required parking spaces
upon the LocL:s, subject to the conditions set forth in Paragraph
11, below.
4
11. The relief hereby granted is subject to the following
conditions:
a. The structures upon the Locus shall be constructed
in substantial conformity with the site plan by John J. Shugrue,
Inc., dated July 10, 2000, a reduced copy of which is attached
hereto as Exhibit A, and the plans as approved by the HDC in
Certificate of Appropriateness No. 30613.
b. In addition to the conforming parking space upon
the Locus, additional driveway area for stacked parking shall be
provided, substantially as shown upon the site plan attached
hereto as Exhibit A. ~ ~~~ ~ ~
Dated: September ~, 2000
~EGE~19E®
TOWN CLERK'S OFFICE
~IANTL~CKE?", ~,~A 02554
SEP 1 8 2000
l1ME:
- - ,1- -G--------_._--._
agLERK:_ ~=.~.3 : o
Edward J. Sanfor
F:\WP\GLOWACKI\walter\53 Wash St\ZHA DEC.doc
5
D.~ Neir Parent ~ ~
I~IIBIT A
'9~y ,S,~q~T
f' ,~ G~,
WASHINGTON STREET
~ S39.48'16'E
~, 41,76'
ml
~~
o,ssroa
2.s
w
o~ g
~ ~;
o
~ 3
z ~
N
W
0
O) in
ck C p, (7
~ U
6d
a~
.a'
r' • LET
3,117 S.F.
~ ~.JS'.
~~
g
'back HVILDDlG 12
~ 286 Sf.
~~ ... 2.98'
~ ~ 41.88'
.;~ N4q'29'07'W ~.
N^TE~ LOT []F RECORD
BUILDINGS PREDATE Z^NING,
SITE PLAN OF LAND
In
NANTUCKET, MASS,
SCALES 1'=15'
DATES JULY" 10, 2000
JOHN J, SHUGRUE INC.
57 OLD SOUTH ROAD
NANTUCKET, MA,
F^R~ WALTER GLOWACKI
5 0
scale In feet
~~
~,~,f LOCUS J,~
O,y ~,~•
sT ~~~ 5~•
P~~ ~v~ i
~` ~~P~ `tiS
f`0`tP SS Q```P~
LOCUS MAP
SCALE 1" = 400'
Z^NING~ RC
MINIMUM LOT SIZES 5,000 S.F.
MINIMUM FR^NTAGE~ 40 FT
FRONT YARD SETBACK~N^NE
REAR & SIDE SETBACKS 5 FT
GROUND C^VER RATI^~ 50%
APPR^VED~
NANTUCKET BOARD of APPEALS
DATE
FILE NUMBER
ASSESS^RS MAP 42.2,3 PARCEL N^, 35 #3466
TOWN OF NANTUCKET
ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
37 WASHINGTON STREET
NANTUCKET, MASSACHUSETTS 02554
PHONE 508-228-7215
FAX 508-228-7205
NOTICE
A Public Hearing of the Nantucket Zoning Board of Appeals will be held at 1:00 P.M., FRIDAY,
SEPTEMBER 8, 2000, in the Conference Room, Town Annez Building, 37 Washington Street,
Nantucket, Massachusetts, on the Application of the following:
WALTER J. GLOWACKI & SONS; WALTER J. GLOWACKI; DAVID D. GLOWACKI; GREG W.
GLOWACKI; AND KIN GLOWACKI
BOARD OF APPEALS FILE NO. (072-00)
Applicants are seeking relief by SPECIAL PERMIT under Nantucket Zoning Bylaw Section 139-
33A (alteration expansion of apre-existing nonconforming structure/use) to validate the demolition and
reconstruction of the primary single-family dwelling without change in its prior dimensions, including side
yard setback intrusion. In the alternative, Applicants are seeking relief by VARIANCE under Nantucket
Zoning Bylaw Section 139-16A to authorize reconstruction of the primary dwelling with a side yard
setback of about 4.3 feet from the northwesterly lot line, being the location of the present foundation in a
district that requires a minimum side yard setback of five (5) feet. In addition, Applicants are seeking
relief by SPECIAL PERMIT under Bylaw Section 139-33E(2xa), to increase the permitted ground
cover ratio to about 37.8% (about 1,179 square feet) in a district that allows a maximum ground cover
ratio of 30% for undersized lots; and under Section 139-18B(2) to reduce the number of required on site
parking spaces from two (2) to one (1) (with the additional space to be provided in a stacked manner).
The Locus is nonconforming as to lot size with the Lot containing about 3,117 square feet of area in a
district that requires a minimum lot size of 5,000 square feet; as to side and rear yard setbacks with the
principal structure's foundation being sited at about 4.3 feet at its closest point from the northwesterly
side yard lot line; with the shed structure being sited at about 2.52 feet at its closest point from the same
lot line; and with the secondary dwelling being sited at about 2.98 feet at its closest point from the
southeasterly side yard lot line and about 1.31 feet at its closest point from the rear yard lot line in a
district that requires a minimum side and rear yard setback distance of five (5) feet; and as to parking with
there being only one (1) parking space provided on site with two (2) being required.
The Premises is located at 53 WASHINGTON STREET, Assessor's Map 42.2.3, Parce135, Plan
Book, Page 33. The property is zoned Residential-Comnier ial. ~
Michael J. O'Mara, Cha' n
THIS NOTICE IS AVAILABLE IN LARGE PRINT OR OTHER ALTERNATIVE
FORMATS. FOR FURTHER ASSISTANCE, PLEASE CALL THE OFFICE AT
(508) 228-7215.
BOA Form 1-89
NANTUCKET ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
37 WASHINGTON STREET
NANTUCKET, MASSACHUSETTS 02554
APPLICATION FOR RELIEF
August 2, 2000
~~ D~a^/tie
CASE No.(. jt'G~
Owner's name(s): Walter J. Glowacki & Sons, Inc; Walter J. Glowacki;
David D. Glowacki; Gre W. Glowacki• and Kim Glowacki
Mailing address: c/o Reade, Gullicksen, Hanlev & Gifford
Applicant's name: Same
Mailing address: Post Office Box 2669, Nantucket, Massachusetts 02589
Location of lot: Assessor's map and parcel number 42.2.3-35
Street address: 53 Washington Street
Registry T""nurm-cz Plan, Plan Bk & Pg ^'-- ~"'- 24-33 Lot
Date lot acquired: 11/15/87 Deed Ref 288/236 Zoning district R-C
Uses on lot - commercial: None x or MCD? _
- number of: dwellings 2 duplex _ apartments _ rental rooms _
Building date(s): all pre-8/72? x or C of 0? _
Building Permit appl'n Nos. 303-99
Case Nos. all BoA applications, lawsuits:
State fully all zoning relief sought and respective Code sections
and subsections, specifically what you propose compared to present
and what grounds you urge for BoA'to make each finding per Section
139-32A x if Variance, 139-30A x if a Special Permit (and 139-33A
x if to alter or extend a nonconforming use). If appeal per 139-31A
& B _, attach decision or orders appealed. OK to attach addendumz
See attached Addendum.
Items enclosed as part of this Application: orderlx addendum2 x
Locus map x Site plan x showing present _ + planned x structures
Floor plans present _ proposed _ elevations _ (HDC approved? _)
Listing lot area x frontage x setbacks x GCR x parking data x
Assessor-certified addressee list 9 sets x mailing labels 2 sets x
$200 fee payable to Town of Nantucket x proof3 'cap' covenant _
I(If an appeal, ask Town Clerk to send Bldg Comr's record to BOA.)
I certify that the requested information submitted is substantially
complete and true to the best of my knowledge, under the pains and
penalties of perj y.
SIGNATURE: Applicant _ Attorney/agent x
3(If not owner or owner's attorney, enclose proof of authority)
Application copies recd: 9
One copy filed with Town C1 ?
One copy each to Planning B
$200 fee check given
Hearing notice posted / ~,\
Hearing(s) on _/_/_ cony
Decision due by _/_/_ mad j j
See related cases
F:\WP\GLGWACXI\va lCe r\53 Wash SC\2HA APP.000
FOR ~oA OFFICE U5E
,L,L/ or oA on / by
erk on ~ ~~ by complete
d and Buildin De / by
surer on y aive
~' ~"`~ mailed / & M
d to _/_/_, _/_/ withd a~? _
e _/ / filed TC _/ /_ mailed
lawsuits other
RECEIVED
TOWN CLERK'S OFFICE
NANTUCKET, MA 02554
AUG 2 5 2000
TIMSE~: I. 3(J pM
CLERK: 1_
ADDENDUM TO APPLICATION OF
WALTER J. GLOWACKI & SONS., INC., ET AL
The applicant requests issuance of a Special Permit under
Nantucket Zoning By-law §§139-33.A, 139-33.E(2)(a), and 139-
18.B(2), and in the alternative a Variance from the Intensity
Regulations in §139-16.A, in connection with the demolition and
reconstruction of a pre-existing, nonconforming single-family
dwelling upon the locus. The locus is nonconforming as to lot
area, containing about 3,117 square feet in a district where the
minimum is 5,000 square feet. As of April 1, 1999, the locus
contained three buildings: a primary dwelling with ground cover
of 893 square feet, a secondary dwelling with ground cover of 286
square feet, and a shed with ground cover of 103 square feet(no
longer to be included in the ground cover computation, pursuant
to Article 29 of the 1999 Annual Town Meeting), for total ground
cover of 1,179 square feet, or about 37.80; a maximum of 300, or
about 935 square feet in the case of the locus, is permitted for
an undersized lot of record. The primary dwelling was also
nonconforming as to side yard setback, having northwesterly side
yard setback of about 4.3 feet at the closest point; a minimum of
five feet is required in this zoning district. The secondary
dwelling is nonconforming as to side and rear yard setback,
having southwesterly rear yard setback of about 1.3 feet at the
closest point and southeasterly side yard setback of about 2.9
feet at the closest point. The shed is nonconforming as to
northwesterly side yard setback, having northwesterly side yard
setback of about 2.5 feet at the closest point. The locus was
also nonconforming as to parking, having one legal parking space
(with provision also of an additional but nonconforming,
"stacked" parking space). The applicant obtained Building Permit
No. 302-99 for the demolition of the primary dwelling, and
Building Permit No. 303-99 for the reconstruction of the primary
dwelling in the same location and with the same dimensions as the
old structure, both dated April 1, 1999. After the applicant had
demolished the old structure and constructed the new foundation,
the Building Commissioner revoked Building Permit No. 303-99 on
March 28, 2000, citing zoni-~.g issues among the reasons for the
revocation.
Accordingly, the applicant seeks relief_ as follows:
_ ?~ Special. Permit ~~.der 5i 39-3~ .A, for the alterat-c--
(by reconstruction and cmoiitionj of the pre-existing,
nonconforming primary dwelling upon the locus, without change in
its prior dimensions, including the side yard setback.
2. In the alternative, a Variance from the side yard
setback regtairement under §=~9-16.A, to authorize reconstruction
-,
-_ . - ~ _. "' ^ r \' '~ /~ ~...:. ~' ~ ... %Y r~ ~ 7 ~, _. ~ a c F? r 1-' ~ !- V /~ r a .~~ / ~ ] t .. G _ r F~ C '_
1
from the northwesterly lot line, being the location of the
present foundation upon the locus.
3. A Special Permit under X139-33.E(2){a), to increase the
permitted ground cover ratio upon the locus to-about 37.8 (about
1,179 square feet, with the shed excluded).
4. A Special Permit under X139-18.B(2), reducing the
number of required legal parking spaces upon the locus from two
to one {with an additional nonconforming space to be provided by
"stacking").
F:\WP\GLOWACKI\walter\53 Wash St\ZBA ADD.doc
2
;~ ~
. ~jj
3
I u32 .. T ~j
I
~ a
Y
•2 32-N
9
,3 syi Ic
yC
I ~
3~ Oy 11
a
37
• Ss Ss
Ia
I ~ 12.32- 2t
i ~~ ~ a
I
~'~ ~ ~P~ ;
5 µ
32
w '
u
~~
oF4 Ia
\ ~Y~~y ~.
~~ ~ '
\ 4i It
~~~
F 31 ~D 9 Is
F
k ~ . F~
I -
P~~ 10MN OT NANTUCKET
~~ 19
I
~ 30 ~3 TOM'N lEACN
11
:: 1 ~ ~~~
I ~~ ^O.~ -~,O.B
~ N ~P~ '1 20
2s 5
~z
13
~..In ~ f
i
~ IMNTUCKE7
I r 21 GO 21
z• P
p .(' ~~ ze Gig NnNTUCKe 2i 8
p G'O~ ~~'P Q.P~ NarRUaE f
F /
I - `~ ss l ~-~ ~
M
i ».LS-1 FFj, r
w I
ss Ls-z ss i.+- d $
REVISIONS IfGEND
~ DALE oARGE1 DIE VwRCEI O~iE i~kCEl ~~1 ~ 1 E' ~~1( )
///-A~~~
1 ` ~~ ~ mT ~~t Y~
INFORMATION $HOwN HEREON wA$ I I I I- 1 1 1,-- ~1
eocr~s~a,iar.
COMPIlEO FROM AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHS, DEEDS.
AND PLANS OF 2KORD AND IS NOT TO BE - ~ ~ ; ~_
CONSTRUED AS HAVING SUFFICIENT ACCUR-
ACY FOP. CONVEYANCE. io s o
r-~--~~ -
Z.
~ n n n
BUILDING AND CODE ENFORCEMENT DEPT.
TOWN BUILDING ANNEX
37 WASHINGTON STREET
NANTUCKET, MASSACHUSETTS 02554
Telephone 508-228-7222
Tele Fax 508-228-7249
John H. Dunn
Building Commissioner
March 28, 2000
Walter Glowacki
PO Box N
Nantucket, MA 02554
Dear ~^,r. Glowacki,
Your permit #303-99 to build a dwelling located at 53 Washington St (42.2.3-35)
has been reviewed pursuant to §139 of the Code of Nantucket and 780 CMR the
Massachusetts State Building Code and is for the following reasons revoked.
All construction is hereby ordered to cease and desist immediately.
The requested footing inspection on Friday March 10, 2000 did not meet the
requirements of 780 CMR 3604.3.1 note #5due to the soil conditions and was not
"signed off'. As a result of the site inspection the file for the above permit was
reviewed. The following information has not been provided or has been found to
be misrepresented on the plans and documentation presented to this office;
• The zoning compliance section of the application has not properly completed
as required. §139-2B of the Code of Nantucket
J The property is within 100' feet of land subject to tidal action. Approval by the
Conservation Commission has not been provided. X139-26C(3) of the Code
of Nantucket
The building is over the permissible ground cover allowed for a lot with less
than 5000 square feet. X139-33{E)(2){a) of the Code of Nantucket
~= A sewer entry permit from the DPI.,, X139-26C(2)(b) of the Code of
,,_n~, ,
.~,~„ ,~cr;e~
The property is located within the Flood-hazard zone (A Zone) 780 CMR
3107.5 the Massachusetts State Building Code
• The foundation plan submitted is not "...prepared ~y a qualified registered
nrofes~~ional engineer or architec~._ " 780 Ctv1R 3iC7 5 the Massachus~~a
Deny 2000\4223-35~gtowacki
~• The foundation plan submitted does not show the proper elevation above the
flood level. 780 CMR 3107.5.1 the Massachusetts State Building Code
~• The foundation plan submitted shows an enclosure below the flood level. 780
CMR 3107.5.3 the Massachusetts State Building Code
• The Plumbing and Electrical permits for the disconnection of utilities for
Building permit #302-99 are required to be "signed off' by the inspectors and
the permit card returned to this office. 780 CMR 112.1 the Massachusetts
State Building Code
You were informed of the above sited violations at a site meeting Monday March,
27 2000. Due the amount of missing information and the time constraints of this
office a complete code review has not taken place, there maybe other code
violations not cited. Please review all applicable codes thoroughly prior to any
re-submission.
Please be advised that you may appeal this decision of the Building
Commissioner to the Zoning Board of Appeals pursuant to §139-31 of the Code
of Nantucket and/or to the Board of Building Regulations and Standards pursuant
to 780 CMR 122. If you require any additional information please contact my
office.
Sincerely,
i
e i~~ ~ ~~,-''tom-`~
John H Dunn
Building Commissioner
Deny 2000\4223-35~glowacki
7
"J
~ Z
V
~i
~ W
~~
~~
~~
NZ
as W
O~
= Q
J '
Q
w
z
oO
O~
U
~~
O
~J
z
w
:? f~-
ri~ Q
~. U
C, ti
r
:' = t.u
r ;_r [/~
^._l rr
:_L a
r:.', U
.ter
~.,_
r.Lr ~-
<~~ o
U~
W
I~
1
m
i~
.~
T
W
W J
LL ~
O
u
bA
.~
d
O
U
w
0
z°
W
a
z
0
Q
W
F-
w
W
m
H
0
O
_~
w
a
O=Om
H ~
Z
C4jZOc$
J a F- W
a~Wo
a ~ a v
__
F=-QZZ
w m m
OwZ-
~ ~ W m
WOza
,~'cnati
=pwm
E--_~~
m
Off?
~°a.=
p~ a ~ U
a
0=~~
F-
UOU
JF-~W
QZ~o
= a ~ Z ,
~... Z O a
~wv~,
W~=U
m~~
v~a~
~ ~ ~ Z
~~~~.
zZZO
a~a~
W -~
UmW
U ~ W
Z F- W Z
o ?Z~,
W W~a Z
aJZ._
W~o9
= Z m ~
I-OOm
wo
U
a
}
zz
O-
~ W
Q
m m
ap
~ °C
~~- Q
of
z}
OC m
~w
O~
a~
~Q
O ~
W W
~z
~.
W Z
m W
J_ m
~~
U=
Z m
aZ
~o
UW
O
OZ
Wp
Q W
U=
V.
~" W
m ~
W J
UJ
a .a
~ Q (~
OZ W
~O _
=W W
~-- a ~
~o a
wU W
c= OO E-
~ Z
w~ O
wO U
oZ. ~
~ ~ a
w z ~;~
H V ..
~z " :.,,~
~o v
w 'l' O.
w
mU ~
~O Z
zm O
Oa U
~o a
cp Z Z
~- ~
J m W
a~0 LLj
zwm ~-
Ua
~ W ~ ~
~~a o
wpm W
m U o. m
~~} ~
a Z Q ~
Sao ~
0
~W~ a
W m (~
a~m
~ ~ ~ ~
i=- a ua. E-
0
U
w
a
Z
z
0
J_
m
w
Q
0
0
U
W
Z
Z
O
Z
W
Q..
b
~~
1
~ ~ ~ i
I z
g
= J O U = = C~ Q ~ U
~ Z ~ ~ ~ Q c~ Q -' ~ ~ ~° ~ ~g~
~ ~ w w o Z o z z g = o° o o v~ z
f- cn ~ ~ ac ~ ~ Q w w u.. ~ ? ~ ~
'+
I I I I I I I I I I I i~ ~sE?rs .4i '.
Z
W
~
Q
J
'q
=
~
Q Z
J
~
0
1 v
a~.h
~V.2
u + ~
Z p
oc v~ V w
_Z
~ ~~~
m .~
~: ~ ~ .~ ~,
c~~` ~
~~~''~
~a~Mm
0
Z
Z
-~
rn
n
O
~ '~ ~ -~ D D 0 0 0 -
2 D
~ m
~ =
~ r
r
m c
~ ap
v z =
m
V1 cDn ~ .~ rn ~
-1 °-
Z z ~
~= v
m
D m ~ ~ c „ ~ Z m
z ~
~0
~ D v ~
=-~ ~
m p
rn
~ n
= 0
z
O D v m ~
C y
0o Z =
D Z
cn O
-n
-i ao
m ~
c n
~ ~ ~ rr- m n ~ D o ~
~ ~ n
O oo n
~
n Z =~ -
z
~ ~
n
~ m
~
z
~
o
o
o ~
_
(n
=~
m
~
~
z
D
-~
m ~
=
~ D n m D ~ ~zj O D cn
v
m
~ -i
m -o
~
-~ m < ~ ~
~ O
~ D
r oo r
r
~
n
Z
~
_ m O
z
Z z °' ~ m Z
v c
i~ D i
D on = ~ °
n
-v o
z Z
m c
m
c
-~ ~
Z ~o ~ v o ~ n O C~
,(n m ~ z ~ ~ 0 = -z
n v ~ Z ~
C ~ ~ v
m Z n D ~
O ~
O rn c
~
C
cn n
O ~
= °
v ~
v
~ z
-+ ~
- 0
-~
~ ~ o ~ Z ~ z Z m
c -Di m ~ D z m
C7 O m D -a -~ (~ O
~ ~o
I't1 c O -o = m m -~ ~
O ~ ~ ~ _
~ c D m ~
z -~
-~ -
~ o
•o ~
m r=-
v z
v
~ o
~
_
m O m -y ~ ~ z Di =
m
'O O
~ .
..~.i -~
m ~ n
O cn
~ c
~ D
~ ~ -•~ z
~ Z v
m r" cmi~ ~°
~
~ ~ m o ~ •., ~ Z
~ z ~ ni D ~ z v ~
~ D ~ O
~ ~ ~
~ 0 = 0
• u~ 7C ? ao ? -n m z
r
D
m
v
Z
0
m
2
m = Z
~ ~ O
~n m
_~
z ~
p mmT ~
~I
m
0 ~'
~ ~
~ ~
`~ O
F ~
b ~
J
v
O
~ m
m
~6R
~ v\
co 0
S ~
rv,
n c,>
d ~> >
:c ~,_,'
__~,
~, .
~_--
G r ~~
r!
m
~~
TI .~
~7 •~
ry`'
1
m m
r~
v O
Z Z ~
0
Z
0 ~
"t'' m
v D
~_
Z
rn °
D
D~
~ Zn
~ (Cj"
~ ~
m
z
1
n
t
O
C ~ ~ D ~ ~ ~ m D
-
r m n cn ao C
D
~
~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ Z = Z
~
~
O
!N
~ ~
z~o~ooo
D mm ~ _ ~ ~O
-I D Z
m D ~ vOi
-. ~z I
ra
C ~ ?~ -n ~o ~ ~o cn -i - ~
m z z 0 z O m m O
r ~0 'D D C D C a0 ~ C
~~ r r= r= n 0~ D~
~ - m ~ r =
n ~
= I ,~
i
m
z
0
D
r
Z
-~
m
n
O
m
r
r
ti
9~ti tiq~tiTG
f~c~ ~°'~~~F~
Oti
WASHINGTON STREET
W
0
u~
Z
i LOCUS
X10 ~,~. `~~
~P ~~
~~P~ `~S
t~
~~O~P g'1 ~ ~~P
LOCUS MAP
SCALE lu = 400'
ZC]NING~ RC
~, MINIMUM LOT SIZES 5,000 S.F.
MINIMUM FRUNTAGE~ 40 FT
r FRUNT YARD SETBACK~NUNE
~ RGR^UND SCUVERE RATIU~ 50%T
N
0
O)~ N
0.6sronck ~ U
Ld
d 0-
a~
4.3'
LOT
~ ' z.'sz~ 3,117 S.F.
a 3.35' .
~N
9~
0.88rouck ~ ~ ' BUILDING It2
286 S.F.
2.b2' ... ?:98'.
~
'• •~,/ 41.88' ~
'`
~' .,~ N44'29'07 .
. ~,
N~TE~ LOT ^F RECORD
BUILDINGS PREDATE ZONING,
SITE PLAN OF LAND
in
NANTUCKET, MASS.
SCALES 1'=15'
DATES JULY 10, 2000
JOHN J. SHUGRUE INC.
57 OLD SOUTH READ
NANTUCKET, MA.
FURS WALTER GLUWACKI ~~P~,~cNaFMass~cti
o~' JOHN GJ,
o J.
~ 15 0 ~ SHUGRUE ~
No 23 0
q Pc~O ~C''
scale in feet ~a
ASSESSORS MAP 42.2.3 PARCEL ND. 35
APPROVEDS
NANTUCKET BOARD of APPEALS
DATE'
FILE NUMBERS
#3466BOA'
fir, w
S39'48'16'E ''':
41.76'
60gRo oc~~~~
F~SSF O
TOWN OF NANTUCKET SUN O ~ 240 RS
ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS ~ - NgN~O~N OF
TUCK~T
Mq
LIST OF PARTIES IN INTEREST IN MATT F THE PETITION OF
~, '~ JJ ~ _
PROPERTY OWNER:...........w~ ' ~-'~ ~ Gu~G C t_.t
.....................................................................
MAILING ADDRESS :...................................1.......1.............~......................
3 1G S tom, n, ~ ................................ .
PROPERTY LOCATION:.........~ ................ ...............
ASSESSORS MAP/PARCEL:.........~.a..~~...'~?..)-...~..~ ................................ .
SUBMITTED BY:.........~. ~'i~~ .............~:1.J.!.~.J1.~.rr1J~..........................
C/
SEE ATTACHED PAGES
1 certif}' that the foregoing is a list of persons who are owners of abutting propem~, o«ners of land
directly opposite on any public or private street or ~vay; and abutters of the abutters and all other
land o~~-ners within three hundred feet of the propert}' line of o«~ner's property, all as they appear
on the most recent applicable tax list. (M.G.L. c. 40A, Section 1 1 Zoning Code Chapter 139.
Section 139-29D (2) ).
D.aTE ASSESSOR'S OFFICE
TOWN OF N.Ai~'TliCKI/T
i
06 /12/00 TOWN OF NANTUCKET
11 :01:07 OWNER'S MAILING ADDRESS LIST
:4ap Block Lot Owner's/Co-Owner's Name Mailing Address/City State Zip P roperty Location
4223 0002 *NANTUCKET TOWN OF 0016 BROAD ST 0034 WASHINGTON ST
NANTUCKET MA 02554
4223 0003 NANTUCKET TOWN OF 16 BROAD ST 0036 WASHINGTON ST
NANTUCKET MA 02554
4223 0004 NANTUCKET TOWN OF 16 BROAD STREET 0038 WASHINGTON ST
NANTUCKET MA 02554
4223 0005 NANTUCKET TOWN OF 16 BROAD STREET 0040 WASHINGTON ST
NANTUCKET MA 02554
4223 0006 NANTUCKET TOWN OF 16 BROAD STREET 0042 WASHINGTON ST
NANTUCKET MA 02554
4223 0007 GLOWACKI WALTER J & ANNE PO BOX 28 0044 WASHINGTON ST
NANTUCKET MA 02554
4223 0009 SANGUINETTI LUCILLE 0020 LIBERTY ST 0054 WASHINGTON ST
NANTUCKET MA 02554
4223 0011 HERON JOANNE PO BOX 2200 0056 WASHINGTON ST
NANTUCKET MA 02584
4223 0038 *HOLDGATE ALMA A BOX 146 0060 WASHINGTON ST
NANTUCKET MA 02554
4223 0014 WOLFE RICHARD C PO BOX 778 0066 WASHINGTON ST
NANTUCKET MA 02554
4223 0015 WEBB VICTORIA Y TR PO BOX 778 0068 WASHINGTON ST
PIONEERS NOMINEE TRUST NANTUCKET MA 02554
4223 0016 CHRISTMAN GAIL PO BOX 1447 0070 WASHINGTON ST
NANTUCKET MA 02554
4223 0041 NISDA INC PO BOX 1848 0071 WASHINGTON ST
NANTUCKET MA 02554
4223 0039 PIETROWSKI MARION E 401 SOUTH AVE 0003 MEADER ST
NEW CANAAN CT 06840
4223 0040 PiETROWSKI MARION E 41 SOUTH AVE 0005 MEADER ST
NEW CANAAN CT 06840
4223 0037 *HOLDGATE ALMA A BOX 146 0057 WASHINGTON ST
NANTUCKET MA 02554
4223 0031 KUEHN ALFRED L 2171 COMMONWEALTH AVE 0004 FAYETTE ST
NEWTON MA 02466
4223 0036 HARLOW DORIS E 0127 LI VINGSTON CI P. 0055 WASHINGTON ST
NE°Dr'AM MA 02492
42'3 0033 AMICK ROBERT A ETAL 22 WALKER TEP.RACE 0001 FAYETTE ST
.-._~::.:TA GA ~E~09
4223 00331 CHAMBERS MA P,Y C 1001 '_.r.=_ DP.I VE =_PT 401 0003 FAYETTE ST
.~ :..~i MP_ C2_-1-1524
+__., 0032 NANTUCKET TOWN OF 16 EHC=.D ._F.FBT 0005 FAYETTE ST
_.___.-_CP_ET MA :554
--- 0034 GLO WP_C K: GiA LTER J ETAL PO =.. _. _-__ 00'9 WASHINGTON G_
..-., ~___„_ ...: =_554
4~~3 0045 CH P.ISTMAN GAIL PO ECX 1447 0015 MEADER ST
i1A tIT JC K.ET MF. 02554
4223 0030 GP.E ENBERG JEFFREY J & LISA 35 WEST LP. `dD RD 0006 FAYETTE ST
WE_TO;J MA 02z.=
4.._~ 0044 LEGG BRIAN W & SUZANNE L 001" _'~~= 1N 0021 MEADER ST
,.._.
,, ,. __
,..~
7. -. -...-_.__`_ .__ _-554
~
-
_--- ..
.~ _.. __ ..
.
NAI: 'JCKET MA 02554 _ _.. _~:N ~i
PAGE 1
MUA5750 9.3
1 ,
i
06/12/00 TOWN OF NANTUCKET
i1 :01:07 OWNER'S MAILING ADDRESS LIST
Map Block Lot Owner's/Co-Owner's Name Mailing Address/City Sta te Zip
4223 0028 LEGG LUCILLE PO BOX 464
NANTUCKET MA 02554
4223 0043 DICKSON WILLIAM J & FLORENCE 0007 EASTLAKE PL
MIDDLETOWN CT 06457
4223 0043 DICKSON WILLIAM J & FLORENCE 0007 EAS T[,AKE PL
MIDDLETOWN CT 06457
4232 0084 *NANTUCKET TOWN OF 0016 BROAD ST
NANTUCKET MA 02554
4232 0024 NANTUCKET TOWN OF 16 BROAD STREET
NANTUCKET MA 02554
4232 0026 *NANTUCKET TOWN OF 0016 BROAD ST
NANTUCKET MA 02554
4232 0142 PARKER JULIA W TRUSTEE 253 MEADOWBROOK ROAD
JWP NANTUCKET NOMINEE TR UST WESTON MA 02493
4232 0086 COYNE THOMAS A & SUSAN W 91 STEPHEN MATHER RD
DARIEN CT 06820
4232 0144 MCCLU RE FREDERICK P & MARGARET 1500 FLEET CNTR
PROVIDENCE RI 02903
4232 0087 WILLIAMS GEORGE & MARY V 19 ASSINIPPI AVENUE
NORWELL MA 02061
4232 0088 LEECH RICHARD E JR & LAURIE H 0005 HIGHLAND AV
BINGHAMTON NY 13905
4232 00891 SALPIETRO NANCY B PO BOX 2558
C/O DARRELL CRATE NEW YORK NY 10163
4232 00892 WEINMAN RHODA H PO BOX 1365
NANTUCKET MA 02554
4232 00893 ROBZNSON JANET LYNN 164 E 72ND ST APT 11A
NEW YORK NY 10021
4232 00894 CRATE DARRELL W PO BOX 6235
C\O TEMPLE-INLAND MORTGAGE CO. BOSTON MA 02114
4232 0028 LEWIS RICHARD E PO BOX 301
NANTUCKET MA 02554
_-4232 ---.~IlE21_ _RAVANIKE-R8Ad,3-Y-GROUP 0030---BERifSNI-RE~Q----- --
C/O ZISSI BARBARA WINCHESTER MA 01690
_--42.32- ----~----00 P.23 BARRETT PETER J & CLA RA H 0010 MARTINS LN -
.
~ _ ._ ~ ~, ~ 1 -H INGHAM _ _ _ MA 02D43
~ /
, . _
~ v ~
~ ~
N UMBEP. OF KECOE3~ = ~
4 c' ~
.
~
~
- y
PAGE 2
MUA5750 9.3
Property Location
0046 UNION ST
0001 FRANCIS ST
0001 FRANCIS ST
0037 WASHINGTON ST
0035 WASHINGTON ST
033E WASHINGTON ST
033R WASHINGTON ST
0034 UNION ST
0036 UNION ST
036- UNION ST
0038 UNION ST
040A UNION ST
040C UNION ST
040D UNION ST
040E UNION ST
0042 UNION ST
0033 WASHINGTON ST
0031 WASHINGTON ST
/.