Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout009-00TOWN OF NANTUCKET BOARD OF APPEALS NANTUCKET, MASSACHUSETTS 02554 Date: March `,5 20 00 Application No.: Owner/Applicant: DONALD H. WARD AND KATHERINE S. WARD To: Parties Decision of following: in Interest and. Others concerned with the the BOARD OF APPEALS in the Application of the 009-00 Enclosed is the Decision of the BOARD OF APPEALS which has this day been filed in the office of the Nantucket Town Clerk. An Appeal from this Decision may be taken pursuant to Section 17 of Chapter 40A, Massachusetts General Laws. Any action appealing the Decision must be brought by filing an complaint in court within TWENTY (20) days after this day's date. Notice of the action with a copy of the complaint and certified copy of the Decision must be given to the Town Clerk so as to be received within such TWENTY (20) days. V ~~ William P. Hourihanu~ Chairman cc: Town Clerk Planning Board Building Commissioner PLEASE NOTE: MOST SPECIAL PERMITS AND VARIANCES HAVE A TIME LIMIT AND WILL EXPIRE IF NOT ACTED UPON ACCORDING~TO NANTUCKET ZONING BY-LAW §139-30I (SPECIAL PERMITS); §139-32I (VARIANCES) ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE CALL THE NANTUCKET ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS. TOWN OF NANTUCKET ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS 37 WASHINGTON STREET NANTUCKET, MA 02554 Assessors Map: 55.4.1 Parcel: 165.1 Residential Old-Historic 4A Silver Street Plan Book 23, Page 69 Deed Book 431, Page 021 At a Public Hearing of the NANTUCKET ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS held at 1:00 p.m., Friday, January 14, 2000 and continued until Friday, February 11, 2000, in the Conference Room, Town Annex Building, 37 Washington Street, Nantucket, Massachusetts on the Application of DONALD H. WARD AND KATHERINE S. WARD, of 800 Bloomfield Avenue, #202, Nutley, New Jersey 07110, Board of Appeals No. 009-00, the Boazd made the following decision: 1. Applicants are seeking relief by VARIANCE under Nantucket Zoning By-Laws Section 139-17 (Height Restrictions). The Locus is presently improved with asingle-family dwelling and lot conforms with all dimensional requirements of the ROH Zoning District in which it is situated. Applicants propose to construct a 24 foot ~ two story addition to the north side of the existing structure which would meet the set back requirements. Do to the topography of the Locus, wherein the land drops from elevation of about 40 feet ~ on the north side, to an elevation of about 26 feet ~ on the south side over a distance of about 100 feet, the addition, when constructed, would exceed the maximum height allowed in the By-law of 30 feet. The Premises is located at 4A SILVER STREET, Assessors Map 55.4.1, Parcel 165.1, Plan Book 23, Page 69, Lot 1. The Property is owned residential old historic. 2. The Decision is based upon the application and the material submitted with and the testimony and evidence presented at the Hearing. The Planning Board made no recommendation as the matter was not a planning concern. There were no letters on file in favor of or in opposition to the Application. 3. Applicants, through counsel, stated that the Lot of land that comprises the Premises is unique in the Zoning District because of the steep drop in elevation from Silver Street southeasterly to the reaz of the Property. Over the length of the Property, a distance of approximately 116.78 f feet, the Property drops from an elevation of 40f feet to an elevation of 26f feet. Based on a plan entitled "Mortgage Inspection Plan in Nantucket, Mass." by Jeffrey L. Blackwell, PLS, dated October 27, 1999, presented by the Applicants through their counsel, it was demonstrated that the most dramatic drop in elevation occurs within the middle half of the lot of land; in other words, that portion of the Property improved by the single-family dwelling and containing the area for the proposed 24 foot ~ by 24 foots addition. 4. Applicants, through counsel, stated that their professional land surveyor had computed that the height of the proposed addition, when calculated from Average Mean Grade, as defined in Section 139-2 of the Nantucket By-law, will exceed the maximum heights allowed in Section 139-17A(1) ofthe By-law. However, counsel for the Applicant stated that the height measurement from that same ridge pole down to the yard directly below is 27.5 f feet. Therefore, the actual height of the house as viewed from Silver Street will be lower than 30 feet when measured from the yard immediately surrounding the proposed addition and will only exceed the restrictions of Section 139-17A(1) when measured from Average Mean Grade. Applicants' counsel filed a letter with the Nantucket Zoning Board of Appeals, dated February 10, 2000, interpreting the requirements of the height restriction portion of the Nantucket By- Law, pursuant to his conversations with Jeffrey Blackwell, Professional Land Surveyor. This letter explained the requirements of By-Law Section 139-17; applied those requirements to the proposal by the Applicants and concluded with the need for the Variance as requested, given the extreme drop in elevation for this building lot. 5. Therefore, the Board specifically finds that owing to the topography of the land comprising the Premises and especially affecting the Premises by not affecting generally the Zoning District in which it is located, that a literal enforcement of the provisions of Section 139- 17A(1)would involve substantial hardship to the Applicant, and further that the desirable relief may be granted without substantial detriment to the public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent or purpose of this By-law. 6. Accordingly, by a UNANIMOUS vote, the Board GRANTS the requested VARIANCE, under Nantucket Zoning By-law Section 139-32 from the Height Restrictions of Nantucket Zoning By-law Section 139-17A(1) to allow construction of the addition as proposed upon the following condition: (a) The average height of all sides of the building when constructed, shall not exceed 33.5 f feet as measured from the Average Mean Grade to the highest point of the building or structure and no one building side shall exceed 33.5 f feet; and (b) The addition as proposed shall be constructed in substantial conformity with Certificate of Appropriateness No. 35,539 issued by the Nantucket Historic District Commission. Dated: March ~J , 2000 Nantucket, MA ~e.~~,~ LIAM P. HOURIHAN, JR. J. O ARDSANFORD NANCY SE NS 7OW~ CLERfCS OFFICE ~lARlTUCKET, MA 02554 MAR 1 5 2000 ASS }. ~ - . ~'-"~ ~^ TOWN OF NANTUCKET BOARD OF APPEALS NANTUCKET, MASSACHUSETTS 02554 Date : March `,5 20 00 To: Parties in Interest and. Others concerned with the Decision of the BOARD OF APPEALS in the Application of the following: Application No.: 009-00 Owner/Applicant: DONALD H. WARD AND KATHERINE S. WARD Enclosed is the Decision of the BOARD OF APPEALS which has this day been filed in the office of the Nantucket Town Clerk. An Appeal from this Decision may be taken pursuant to Section 17 of Chapter 40A, Massachusetts General Laws. Any action appealing the Decision must be brought by filing an complaint in court within TWENTY (20) days after this day's date. Notice of the action with a copy of the complaint and certified copy of the Decision must be given to the Town Clerk so as to be received within such TWENTY (20) days. V ~~ William P. Hourihanu~ Chairman cc: Town Clerk Planning Board Building Commissioner PLEASE NOTE: MOST SPECIAL PERMITS AND VARIANCES HAVE A TIME LIMIT AND WILL EXPIRE IF NOT ACTED UPON ACCORDING~TO NANTUCKET ZONING BY-LAW §139-30I (SPECIAL PERMITS); §1'39-32I (VARIANCES) ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE CALL THE NANTUCKET ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS. TOWN OF NANTUCKET ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS 37 WASHINGTON STREET NANTUCKET, MA 02554 Assessors Map: 55.4.1 Parcel: 165.1 Residential Old-Historic 4A Silver Street Plan Book 23, Page 69 Deed Book 431, Page 021 At a Public Hearing of the NANTUCKET ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS held at 1:00 p.m., Friday, January 14, 2000 and continued until Friday, February 11, 2000, in the Conference Room, Town Annex Building, 37 Washington Street, Nantucket, Massachusetts on the Application of DONALD H. WARD AND KATHERINE S. WARD, of 800 Bloomfield Avenue, #202, Nutley, New Jersey 07110, Board of Appeals No. 009-00, the Board made the following decision: 1. Applicants are seeking relief by VARIANCE under Nantucket Zoning By-Laws Section 139-17 (Height Restrictions). The Locus is presently improved with asingle-family dwelling and lot conforms with all dimensional requirements of the ROH Zoning District in which it is situated. Applicants propose to construct a 24 foot t two story addition to the north side of the existing structure which would meet the set back requirements. Do to the topography of the Locus, wherein the land drops from elevation of about 40 feet f on the north side, to an elevation of about 26 feet f on the south side over a distance of about 100 feet, the addition, when constructed, would exceed the maximum height allowed in the By-law of 30 feet. The Premises is located at 4A SILVER STREET, Assessors Map 55.4.1, Parcel 165.1, Plan Book 23, Page 69, Lot 1. The Property is owned residential old historic. 2. The Decision is based upon the application and the material submitted with and the testimony and evidence presented at the Hearing. The Planning Board made no recommendation as the matter was not a planning concern. There were no letters on file in favor of or in opposition to the Application. 3. Applicants, through counsel, stated that the Lot of land that comprises the Premises is unique in the Zoning District because of the steep drop in elevation from Silver Street southeasterly to the rear of the Property. Over the length of the Property, a distance of approximately 116.78 f feet, the Property drops from an elevation of 40f feet to an elevation of 26f feet. Based on a plan entitled "Mortgage Inspection Plan in Nantucket, Mass." by Jeffrey L. Blackwell, PLS, dated October 27, 1999, presented by the Applicants through their counsel, it was demonstrated that the most dramatic drop in elevation occurs within the middle half of the lot of land; in other words, that portion of the Property improved by the single-family dwelling and containing the area for the proposed 24 foot f by 24 footf addition. 4. Applicants, through counsel, stated that their professional land surveyor had computed that the height of the proposed addition, when calculated from Average Mean Grade, as defined in Section 139-2 of the Nantucket By-law, will exceed the maximum heights allowed in Section 139-17A(1) ofthe By-law. However, counsel for the Applicant stated that the height measurement from that same ridge pole down to the yard directly below is 27.5 f feet. Therefore, the actual height of the house as viewed from Silver Street will be lower than 30 feet when measured from the yard immediately surrounding the proposed addition and will only exceed the restrictions of Section 139-17A(1) when measured from Average Mean Grade. Applicants' counsel filed a letter with the Nantucket Zoning Boazd of Appeals, dated February 10, 2000, interpreting the requirements of the height restriction portion of the Nantucket By- Law, pursuant to his conversations with Jeffrey Blackwell, Professional Land Surveyor. This letter explained the requirements of By-Law Section 139-17; applied those requirements to the proposal by the Applicants and concluded with the need for the Variance as requested, given the extreme drop in elevation for this building lot. 5. Therefore, the Boazd specifically finds that owing to the topography of the land comprising the Premises and especially affecting the Premises by not affecting generally the Zoning District in which it is located, that a literal enforcement of the provisions of Section 139- 17A(1)would involve substantial hazdship to the Applicant, and further that the desirable relief may be granted without substantial detriment to the public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent or purpose of this By-law. 6. Accordingly, by a UNANIMOUS vote, the Board GRANTS the requested VARIANCE, under Nantucket Zoning By-law Section 139-32 from the Height Restrictions of Nantucket Zoning By-law Section 139-17A(1) to allow construction of the addition as proposed upon the following condition: (a) The average height of all sides of the building when constructed, shall not exceed 33.5 f feet as measured from the Average Mean Grade to the highest point of the building or structure and no one building side shall exceed 33.5 t feet; and (b) The addition as proposed shall be constructed in substantial conformity with Certificate of Appropriateness No. 35,539 issued by the Nantucket Historic District Commission. Dated: March ~~2000 Nantucket, MA WII.,LI,AM P. HOLTRIHAN, JR. SWARD SANFORD J. O ~ C,c~t °~fi7~ t-~---- ~°~ECIEIVED ~ ~OiNN CLER1<'S OFFICE NAN Y SE , NS ~VAIVTUCKET, MA 02554 l~A~ 15 2000 _. Ass }..._ ..~. TOWN OF NANTUCKET ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS 37 WASHINGTON STREET NANTUCKET, MASSACHUSETTS 02554 PHONE 508-228-7215 FAX 508-228-7205 NOTICE A Public Hearing of the Nantucket Zoning Board of Appeals will be held at 1:00 P.M., FRIDAY, JANIIARY 14, 2000, in the Conference Room, Town Annex Building, 37 Washington Street, Nantucket, Massachusetts, on the Application of the following: DONALD H. WARD AND KATHERINE S. WARD BOARD OF APPEALS FILE N0. 009-00 Applicants are seeking relief by VARIANCE under Nantucket Zoning Bylaw §139-17 (height restrictions). The Locus is presently improved with a single-family dwelling and the Lot conforms with all dimensional requirements of the ROH zoning district in which it is situated. Applicants propose to construct a 24'+ x 24+' two-story addition to the north side of the existing structure which would meet the setback requirements. Due to the topography of the Locus, wherein the land drops from an elevation of about 40' on the north side to an elevation of about 26' on the south side over a distance of abut 100 feet, the addition, when constructed would exceed the maximum height allowed in the Bylaw of 30 feet . The Premises is located at 4A SILVER STREET, Assessor's Map 55.4.1, Parcel 165.1, Plan Book 23, Page 69, Lot 1. The property is zoned Residential-Old-Historic. ~~ECEiV~® TOWN CLERK'S OFFICE `NANTUCKET, MA 02554 _ DEC 2 3 X999 ~a~}-. \ ~ l.~-~ William P. Hour' an, Jr., Chairman THIS NOTICE IS AVAILABLE IN LARGE PRINT OR OTHER ALTERNATIVE FORMATS. FOR ASSISTANCE PLEASE CALL (508) 228-7215. . BoA'.Form 1-139 owner's name(s): Mailing address: 27'127TIICIZET ZO27I27O IlORI2D OF ]1PPEALB TOW27 ]127D COU27TY TSUILDINCi~ ~ D to NA27TUCI~ET, DSA 02554 CA£,E No - TPPLICATION FOR R7;LrFP Donald H. Ward and Katherine S. Ward Vaughan, Dale and Hunter, P'.C., Whaler's Lane, Nantucket, P(A Applicant's name: Same Mailing address: Same Location of lot: Assessor's map and parcel number 55.4.1 Street address- 4A Silver Street Registry Land Ct Plan, Plan Bk & Py or Plan File Bk 23/PQ 69 Lot 1 Date lot acquired: ~~ 93 Deed Ref 43/21 Zoning district RoH Uses on lot - commercial: None _ or 1dCD?_ - number of: dwellings- duplea_ apartments- -rental rooms~ Building date(s): all pre-II/72? or C of O?_ Building Permit appl'.n. Nos. ~• Case Nos. all IIoA applications, lawsuits; State fully all zoning relief sought and respectivc'Code sections and subsections, specifically what you propose compared to present and what grounds xou urge for BoA to make each finding per Section 139-32A _ if Variance, 139-30A if a Special Permit.(;a}~d 139-33A if .to alter or'•ext'end 'a noncon~onning use) . If appeal per 139-3~A & B _ , atL-ach decision or order appealed. Ori to attach addenduml. SEE ADDENDUM ATTACHED HERETO .. + ,}~ ~ U • !L N • Items enclos m ed as part of~his Application- orderl a dendum2 Site lan h i ~" W ~ ~ ~ ipp/ Floor P Listin s lo p - s ow ng present •t-planned+ structures present proposed elevations / (~iDC~ approved? «o~ t ~ ~ ~ W ~ ~..: .~ g area rontage etbacks / GCR / parking data' A ssessor-certified addressee l t ~• •' - ~} W W ~ Q S pa ~•2IP a~c is 4 et~ mayling labe lYY 2 set- ablc...to.._1'osm of 27antuc}:et ~ proofs - ' cap' COfi'enant - --1 Y ~ U ~~ U ~ a ( pp al, ask Town Clerk to sencT-llldg Comr?~ record to BoA.~f- ~ ~ ~ W Y I certify th complete and t the re quested information submitted is substantially true.to tie best-of my knowlecjge under the i ~~ ~ i',;,_•~ • ~ ' ' 1 j N perTalties of , w ns and rjur / 1 ~•••~'~~• ~•~ }--;~ ;~ l _n'~FA .~ =~ ' ~' SIGNATURE: V ~ Applicant Attorney/agent x ~; ~ - 3 Wtlli F Hunter, Esquire (If not owner o o ner's attorney, enclose proof of authority) PO BoA I'FICE USE /'~ /yy' ( ////~1~^ Application copies rec' d: 4 or for- Bo on .. 7 L/ i by 'J, ~;•.i• L~J/ One copy filed with Town Clerk on C ___, y plete. One copy each to Planning.Bd and Building,De~t by ~.. $200 fee checY, given Town Tr asurer//on~~ by waived? Rearing notice posted~~~mailedl~~I ~ b~~~, ~. "" vv Hearing(s) on_/_ /_ cont'd to_/_/_, ~~_ withdrawn?_/_/_ Decision d~~._ by~/_../_ made~~_ filed. TC_/~_ mailed`/~_ Sce related cases lawsuits other 165.1 ADDENDUM Applicants, Donald H. Ward and Catherine S. Ward, seek a Variance pursuant to Section 139-32 of the Nantucket Zoning By-Law from the requirements of Section 139-17 of the By-Law as amended. Locus is presently improved by asingle-family wood frame dwelling. The Premises are located in the ROH Zoning District and conform in all respects with the dimensional requirements of said District. Applicants propose to construct a 24'+ by 24'+ two story addition to the north side of the existing dwelling. Due to the topography of the Locus, wherein the Locus drops from an elevation of 40' on the north side to an elevation of 26' on the south side over a distance of 100 + feet, the addition when constructed will exceed the maximum height allowed in the By-Law. The requested relief is in harmony with the intents and purposes of the Nantucket Zoning By-Law. Given circumstances relating to the soil condition, shape or topography of the locus and especially affecting this locus and not affecting generally the zoning district in which it is located, a literal enforcement of the provisions of the By-Law would involve substantial hardship to the Applicants. This desired relief may be granted without substantial detriment to the public good, and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intents and purposes of the By-Law. The Applicant asks the Board to vote in favor of the Variance as requested. .. ; MAP 55.4.1 .PARCEL_ 165. 1 ~ ~~ Q32-a4 +taz- a a ,. ,. ,,~• N ioz,ooo. ~~ a If 9/ /\ `t'•` a SSRE~'S zc o 9 f ~ ~, ~ j w~ .J a3U- 3 0 ly! 21 . S G Ej i ~ $~V~ SS.I.t 'I -2f ~~ 22 I i i SS u -z e zs ~ J 10 n s7 gS PEES d EA z+ es i ze I 72 ~ ~e ~ 5~. ~ ~~~~ i SSI,~-23 I 1 1 y01.~ ~ t5 -21 i - _± ~4 33 t~,tl ~_ i`1 . 2f r ~1 i >s '~ ~ 29 .~ ' 117 ~ 13 11• \ y0 11f 113 ~\ yl ~ ~ 1 7~~ ~ ~ II `1~ p'~ f 2 \~ ~~ f3 1 P~'~ ,I ~ SS.N-21 ~ •{ ` ~ t 91U•f ~ ~~ t0 ~ M S ~2 a7 a yaa. ZO~IIN~'CLASSI>:IC;ATION: ~ROK EXISTING: IAW.,ARfA . , ,5000 S.F:. , ,Go19.tS.F UW. FRONTAGE:. 50 Fr. .. .5>~F p~.AN FRONT YARD S.B.:. ~oN~ ... ... " REAR & SIDE S.8 :. ~ ~:.. .. " ~~ GROUND COVER (x):. ~~. ~ .. .. ~~•~. ~ .t PRO fUSL~D zA~ X z4' ADD1T/pX/ 55 4. I - /G4 /~/ /F ,41~ti/ L. S1IE~,YAN TI MSE'R 8~ G R,4Y>rL, W,4L.K~/A.Y 5.4.1- 188 To~lu of NQIJTLtCKI~T S ! L V~k ONLY ORIGINALLY STAMPED AND ENDORSED COPIES OF THIS PLAN SHALL BE ACKNOWLEDGED BY THE CERTIFYING LAND SURVEYOR. z6.5 D~'NoTES ~X/STING ~L.EViITION 37 D~IJOT~S ~X/STING Co~/ToL.TR _'. 3"/.50 4oxz DR/~1rWAY 40 ~ \ `~ o \ ' 3\9\~ 38 37 \ 36-- 35 -- _ 34 -_ 33 3z ~ :~ ooh . r~. C9z9 ~ ~ . Z8 ~ 24.0' \ ~. ~~ 0 ST. '~T3FNCl-/MAP.K~ PK.~UAI~ E~.F~ = 4z.oo ~_ .4sscln~D Arun-r -' 6 4ox ~~~~~ ~ I ~ 3 G 2Y 53.4• r - /G~ N/F N,d7"/(.4N/E~ f N/.E-L/SSA Pf(/L, f.3,e/C~ 0.9~ov~R TNR~SKOLD El~v = 4z.6 R/DG~ .~L~V.~ O 58.6 ~ , 3 * 31, ~DECK1~ 0.4* ' ~- . overt ~ ` ~ ~ STEPS-/ z9 Z8Y/ BRICK P,gTlO z.6 x 5 Z8 ~ X9 z6Y4 ~ xz 5/.50 .55.4. I - 189 r~l F GERTRcII~ Yi ~2A T0: , KATKERIN~ 5. w~,RD 4ND ......... . . . .... . DoNAL.D..klQJ:D .......AND NO OTHERS. I CERTIFY, TO THE BEST OF IIY KNOWLEDGE. THAT THE' -l~QNDSCAP~ TI M.BFR STS P5 SEE E,4SlrMEIJT DE)` D Z64 - 3Z8 ~~~~ZH OF A~Igss~~ o JEFFREY yGJ, L. B,L1A^CIMiELL ~' .Q ~. ~~~ _ G~OG°~4C~QC~~ ~G~~G°~~C~400G~ G°~d °. ~] ~~ G~lQ~J4M~~4r ~n1Q~~. :~~~0-~31P~~E021 QUITCLAIM DEED BENEFICIAL MORTGAGE CO. OF MASSACHUSETTS, a Delaware corporation having an usual place of business at 338 Main Street, Hyannis, Massachusetts, for consideration paid and in full consideration of $167,500.00 does hereby grant and convey to DONALD X. WARD and !CATHERINE 8. WARD, husband and wife, of 22 Canbrldge Dr., N. Caldwell New Jersey, as tenants by the entirety, with Qu tcla m Covenants, the land. and building thereon situated in the Town and County of Nantucket, Commonwealth of Massachusetts, bounded and described as follows: Lot ~1 on the Plan of Land in Nantucket Island, Mass., as prepared for David A. and Diana R. Murphy by Nart-Blackwell Assoc., Inc., Nantucket, MA 02554 and entered with the Nantucket . County Deeds in Plan Bk. 23, Page 69, more particularly described as follows: W Northerly by Silver Street, 51.50 feet; ~ Easterly by land now or formerly of David A. Murphy and Diana _I R. Murphy being 116.98 feet; iJ Southerly by land now or formerly oP Gertrude Viera Allen, 51.50 feet; and J ,'x Westerly by land now or formerly of George Davis, 116.78 feet. Said. premises contain 6,019 square feet, more or less, and are subject to easements, covenants and restrictions of record, if T any, insofar as the same remain in force and applicable. Hereby meaning and intending to convey the same property conveyed to the Grantor by foreclosure deed dated May 10, 1993 recorded in Nantucket Deeds, Bk. 422, Pg. 140, to which reference for Grantor's title may be had. The property hereby conveyed is conveyed in the normal course of business and does not constitute substantially all the Grantor's assets within the Commonwealth. IN WITNESS WHEREOF the said BENEFICIAL MORTGAGE CO. OF MASSACHUSETTS has caused these presents to be executed and its seal to be hereto affixed, in its name and on its behalf, by .Andrew J. Primo, its District Manager, hereunto duly authorized this 20th day of November, 1993: BE EFICI L M R GE O. OF MASSACHUSETTS .~ ~ 'l v 1 j; ~ a? d w stY ct Manager w v r._ r- cc ~ r~ o w Z T o u] y~ Z N o H q \ ~X IA ¢W "'~ ¢ +L h u N i ~ j - . ,, x m A w B ~ ~~R~ . ~' • ~~~ m a ' N ti ~. 1 (!IN ~ 1 ~, c~p ~1 ~ l ~ ~~~ is ~ ~ ~ 8 ~ ~ ~ J ~ ~• a N 27°37'30"W -L ~- ~ 72.47 ~ ~ ~ N 29• I s ~ ~` ,, - ~, paw ~c~ N ~ < ~ ~ ~ ~ N A a . .. ~' ~ 116.98 o g `-S 29.3 ' a 8~ , w N N ~ N~~ y v m tD W o ~' w ~~ ~ t D i~? ~ ~ rv ~6 c n m ~ Q- ~ ~ 33' ~ ~ ~~ ~ c~ " S~,Z~~ ~ ~a ~ ~~ ~.S ~ ~ ~~~ . ~ ~ . ~ ~m~. ~A~ x~~~ a~ ~ George Qwis Dd. 206,p.94 .,.,~^' ' '^- N ( i ..., r ,..~.~~ ~~ a ~I 111' m 0 o Z ~ ~ _ ~ ~, ~a £ - 1y ~ _ _ ~ SE - N ~ ~ m \ , 60.00 "~ ~~ R' O ASSDGE 2B B PAR~G~ :8 O T ~ ~ _ N li f \ * M N OS E N A ~~ ~ ~ _ ~ ~O ~ D ~o ~ ~ W fm*1 o ~ p• a w - to ~ ~O°1 O ?~ --~ c N o ~ O_ O A f A ~ 46 ~,; ~ S 28.56' Id' E ' z ~ K ~ ~' ~ N2Dg ~ ~ o m` ~~~ ° ° a ~ ~ ~ t I s ~I~ ~ ~ ~ n ~ v ~ ~ Z a .~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ A ~~ R ~" ~• ~ ~1~~~~r~~ ~ ~ ~ 11115+ ~' ~ V V p ~' 1/ ZONIN6j~CIASSiFICATION: RoK EXISTING: ONLY ORIGINALLY STAMPED AND ENDORSED COPIES OF THIS PLAN ~. ARC 5000 5. F. , GO 19, t S. F SHALL BE ACKNOWLEDGED BY MW. FRONTAGE: , 30, Fr. , , , ,s~>:~ ?t..A>:! THE CERTIFYING LAND SURVEYOR. FRONT YARD S.B.:.. ..... .... z6.5 D~NOTLcS EX/STING ELEVATION REAR do SIDE S.B.:. ~ F.T : .. ~~ ~~ GROUND COVER (X):. ~~. ~ .. .. if•5. ~ .t 37 D,~'NOT,ES EX/ST/1~lG COalTbL1R 0 S 1 lr ~ ~ ~ ST ~ BENCNMAKK ~ P.K. ~(/Ail- ~~.FV = 4z.oo ASSUMED DaruM ,~I.50 4o xz DR/~Ewar 40 ~ PROF~SED 2A• x Z4~ \ ~ o x6 ,4DD1T/Or./ ~ 55.4.! - /G5 zd.o \ N/F 39~ \ po ~ .o ~ NQTNAN/,EZ, 4 M~E'L/SS,4 \ !S ~40 ~ Pff/Z.,BR/C~ 38~ 37 ~ ~ ~ 35 4. / - /G4 3~- ~ K/F ~ 3 G,Z; _ 35-_ O aAllJ ~. Sl~lE~/(.QN 34 -._ 09 ov_rR 33 ~ .' TNRESHOI.D ~I.>`v = 4z.6 TIMSER&GR/SYEL, 3z ~ ~dNDSCAPE" WALKWAY 3i 6~~V.- R~D~ o T/ M,B~R STS P5 ao~• 8. SEE E,QSEMEI.IT 30 , 3:: .~. 31 DEED Z64 - 3Z8 _ - ` - - z8 ~ .. ' ~~ ~ OVER '~ ~ ~ 28 7 ~ BRICK PgTIO ~ Z,6 x 5 Z8 ~,ZH OF ~gss ~O r9 ~~ q ~v JEFFREY ~yGcP o~ ~- \~ ~' ' BLACKYY'ELL j 26 Y 4 ~ xz ~ ~~~~ ~aa ; ~~ 55:4.1- 188 5/,x'0 °~F ~~~fsrEa~~' ~~ ss' J~ TO~(-.! OF NtLI;JT~CKET O~'A< <aaos 5~.4. I - 189 ff~F GERTRUIJ~ VIE 2/~ ~iIOG°~4C~QC~C T0: . KATKERIN~, , S. warzD.. QED....... ~CnJ~[°~CSC~400U~ (~f~C°-J `(~ DoNAt~D. •k(A1:D ,AND NO OTHERS. 0~ I CERTIFY, TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE, THAT THE ~~° G~4MC~C~CSQa UVUL~-J°U°Uo PREM~ES SHOWN ARE LOCATED IN FLOOD HAZARD ZONE: OCT 27.1999 .. ,DELINEATED ON F.I.R.M. /COMMUNITY PANEL SCALE: 1'= Zo' DATE: //aV. z3, 1993 NUMBER: 250230-00 .. I ~ ... D, BY THE FEDERAL R>r V is ED ~ !2 - I - 99 EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY. EFFECTNE DATE OF ~Tl-(EK/N~ S. WA1eD A~/~~ Owner:. MAPS: JUNE 3, 1986 AND AS PERIODICALLY REVISED. `~Ol~/.4LD K. l,/,4TZ/7. THIS INSPECTKOV PLAN WAS PREPARED FOR MORTGAGE PURPOSES ' ONLY AND IS NOT TO Bf CONSIDERED A FULL WSTRUMENT SURVEY. Deed~Cert.: ,8K•.A31 x.121 Plan: gk•Z3 Fis.69 t~oT 1, THIS PLAN SHOULD NOT BE USED TO ESTABIJSH PROPERTY L1NES. ' FENCES, HEDGES OR ANY ANCILLARY STRUCTURES ON THE PREMISES. THE PROPERTY LINES SHOWN RELY ON Ci1RRENT DEEDS AND PLANS Tax Map:.~5.•4•~".165 /Locus: .'4'A SII~VE2 ,ST. OF RECORD. THIS INSPECTION PLAN IS NOT A CERTIFlCATION AS TO THE T1TLE OR OWNERSHIP OF THE PROPERN SHOWN. OWNERS OF ADJOINING PROPERTIES ARE SHOWN ACCORDING TO CURRENT TOWN OF NANTUCKET ASSESSOR RECORDS. THIS PLAN-SHALL NOT BE USED FOR ANY OTHER PURPOSE OTHER THAN fTS WTENDED USE STATED ABOVE _ ©gb~,,,~ ~ Associctes ~,~, NOT TO BE RECORDED FBK.: BLACKWELL & ASSOCIATES, Inc. Professiorwl La~r~d Surveyors 6 Young's A'ay Nantucket, 11~assachusetts 02554 (508) 228-9026 ~ - 4010 C'~..~, .' ~ •~ . ~a TOWN OF NANTUCKET ~~ HISTORIC DISTRICT COMMISSION LIST OF PARTIES IN WTEREST M THE MATTER OF THE PETITION OF OWNER: D°~°`- ~. vlI PROPER'T'Y .................................~. ............a.r.~............................. MA-II.TNG ADDRESS :........................:................................................................. PROPERTY LOCATION :............. ~ A:....`J..!..! VG~......~.~!~: e~:~................. ASSESSORS MAP/PARCEL :...............5?r..c~..y..~..::..1 IoS.:.l.............. .................. SUBMITTED BY :................................................................................................ SEE ATTACHED PAGES ! certify the foregoing is a list of persons tivho are owners of land directly adjacent to the subject propcrry or directly opposite the subject property on any public or private street or ~vay, all as they appear on the most recant applicable tax list. ..........!.~ . ~.9~.9..9 ............... DATE ASSESSOR'S OFFICE TOWN OF NANTUCKET e°~9o Fc O,~qs/~j~ No~,~ SFSO tiq~ TOE _ G 1999 ~'4S T~c~ ~~ FT tiiq .~~ TOWN OF Pl1.NTUCKET .~ 09'l,. OWNER'S ;".AILING ADDRESS LLST Map Elock Lot Cwnar's/Co-OUner's Name Mailing Address/City State Zip Property Location 5541 0165 FHILBRICK NATHANIEL B MELISSA 6004 SILVER ST 0004 SILVER ST NANTUCKET M4 G2554 5541 0164 SHEEHAN .4NN L 0006 SILVER ST 0005 SIL`lER ST NANTUCKET MA 02554 5541 0128 KI!~NEY VIRGINIA R PC BOX 611 0002 EAGLE L!~ PANTUCKET MA C2554 5541 0129 EVANS MiLDRED 0003 SILVE3 ST 0003 SILVER ST NANTUCKET MR 02554 5541 0188 *NANTUCKET TCWN CF 0016 BROAD ST 0000 W DOVER ST NANTUCKET MA 02554 p 0009 W DOVER SSy1 NUMBER OF ~a5 RECORDS = ~-n~. ~63~ ,~ 6 }~ e U2'( G `_ U~G~ Q t,~ ~~ r Je t ~-O`"~ ``~ ~9 e lloren ce C La{c,~,rnou~,N`i La•~- ~ 05 38 PACE 1 MUAS?50 9.2 J ~ ,~~ fi I . ~~~ ,' , ~% \ , ~ ~~ ~ <c~'I ;~ ~. --1 ~~~ ~ ... ~ i ~ ~ ~~ .~.. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ . ~ ~ ~ ~ _ . (14 M + r ~ ~9 ~j ~ y' x ~ +x t~~ ~ ~. ;, ' ''~ 1 ~ i~~ , ~}' r~Y i ~ ; i ~ r.! ~ ~ , , ~ ~ ~ ~ i • . . ~ ' . . ,. ~ ~ ~ ~~i~ I f I`~ ,, _~ . ¢J~ ~. I „_ ,~ ~ 1 .. . ~ ; ~Q~ I t i 1 { ~ .~.. ~. ti }~ I 1 - -- - ~i i „, ~ i ~~ , ~ '.~ 1 I ~!{~ ~ t ~~ ;,- 1,, 1 ;~ 1 r"T_'1 ~ ~ ;-~-=--T _ - ~ l ! ,I~.. .._.._ i r..._ ._.....». , i ~~ ~ ;. --.~ ~\f f \~ c~ v II l ~ ~~ ~-- ~~ t Q 1 ;1__. _... _._.~ -+ ~ j \~ ~ ~ ~- - . - ----~-- - ~--•-i ~ Q \ ~ .- (~I I~ I 1 i l I i i I 1 I n ~~ -~. ._.~~~ ~__ ----... f ~~ ~ i ~' ~ t i 1~~ ~~~ ' E ~ ~ i --------- a r ~, i I' r a ~, ,, ,; a -~ ,:~~ `. {r ~~ ,.`~, '~~ ,~~:' .,~ ,:,, ~~~, {~J.. '=a~. ~/ ,~ ~~ ~ I \ `I~, ~,, n 1,N / ,~•,.~"i14 .~ . ''•'~• ~a':Yti' t ,t' ~J,' l:., . ,. `ry . .. :4ti ~i ', ~~4- '".l V { ~y' ~ ~.. ' ;t ~wf~~ %)~ }~~ ty. .. 't~` ~ _ ~ ~ .. : ~~ '~r ~""~ .. ~...:.J:p.:..R y, :-',~! +~ ` Vii. ~ w y~>~F~ . ^,xX~r + ~' ,~`t. ~. " ~ ,~r~ti, r.'~''' ~ti/~ _•. .~ 1 5 .t :~* ~ ' :, , ,~. 1 •1~P ~, ; t •~ ;3 ~ ~ /i i ;ti _ ~,.1 -t I - ~ 1 _ I .~t ~ i -~- __~._.._ _ -__- 1 ~ ~ , + _ ~ ~ ~. ~ .; } ___--r_ ~ ~ I .f ~; !I ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~~ i , i i ~+ ~ t I (~ ;' c~ ~~ ~ ~:- ~ _. , t ~ .i_ ~ i ,~ i ~ t. + ~1 ~~ I ~ i ~ t~ I ~~ I' ~; ~ + I ~ ` ~1 • I ~ ~ ~ ,~ 1 I ', ,~ j --~--~ . .,. ~ i ~+ + r-- ' ~ ~ ~ , _.;_. ~ t i --1---' ~ I i . . - .. . Y .. ; ' t F~•: i;a~; , ..~_ ,. .zr di ~~+ ~,y. ;~' \~. ,._ ..~ ~ . ~i E . ---~~ (c~~ ~, _~., F ,~~' 1__ y.1 - - ~: - ~~~ ~ ~ _ - _ ~i ~~ ~ 1~ li 1 !I I is i j ~l ;~, i', I i ~ ,, ,: i .. i 1~ ~i ': I 4~~ III 1 ~ _ I i _...f --- i -- ~ ~~~ . . __.~.. 1 _ 1 1 1., .; ~`~ I 1 ', _ _ -:__-_ . ~.._ I, 1 ~~ f __ .__- i ~ j I ~ fl fi- ; x. ~ _ i ~~ ~ ~ !, ~` ~ ~ ~ <<: ~ ~ 1 i .~ i f ,. , 1 +-. _.._ ., ~r 0 4 ~ t .TM ..~ ;~ ,~ ' ~\ ' ~ '~• -~ r~x Ool 'i ~~ ~~ ~;~ i ~. --~ , lp~: f~ I` ~ ~ . +~ , t; '' r~ ---~ '~ ~ ~ ~p1 1 , ~~_ 1 t ;- ~, , ;. I ' , ,if ~t .1 .~ T ' ~ ~~~ ~i ' ~__ - ,x ,~ !~ ~' ~ ~ , . ~•