HomeMy WebLinkAbout038-78
CJ3~.-7~
'1\p
BOARD OF APPFALS
Nantucket, Massachusetts
DECISION:
At a regular meeting of the Board 0f Appeals held
December 19, 1978, at the Town Buildinq, in the matter of
the petition of WILLIN1 YAroW (038-78), after due
deliberation, the Board found:
1. The petitioner owns a one-acre lot in Pocomo
in a district zoned LUG-3 requiring 120,000 square feet.
Under the by-law, he could construct a house of 1,429
gquare feet, but requests a variance to construct a
house of 2,784 square feet on Lot 20, Land Court Plan
No. l6220-A. Of this area, the house itself will cover
1,684 square feet and the balance will be garage space.
The area is sparsely populated and the petitioner's lot
is in an area dedicated to open-space preservation.
2. The petitioner has owned this land since
1974, has recently sold his previous home and desires to
construct a suitable residence for his family. He has
encountered a hardship since the configuration of his
lot in this area would dictate an unusually small house
under the allowable ground cover ratio. The policy of
the Board favoring construction of garages in area such
as this, the actual extent of the dwellinq are~is not
detrimental to the neighborhood. Therefore, a literal
enforcement of the by-law would involve substantial
hardship.
3. Relief may be qranted without substantive
detriment to the public good and without nullifying or
substantially derogating from the intent or purpose of
the by-law.
4. 'T'he variance is gTanted~ unanimous 'lote.
~~~~~~~ \Ll L,t'l~
'\ '. ~ ~ ~\>v...
~~~.~~
\ ~~~~
BOAED OF 1'.PPEAI.S
rMJL (l
f ' /Jl~
\ \ "
'...;., I
-~--
I
I
/
,
I
, I
",.. ,/
.0'_,__
~..,,- .,.,... '." ..~
FEE
'''''"''~''''''''''''''~'''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''.''''"'''''''''' '''''''''''''''''~~''.S'''''''N''~'~~,i'''''!J!O'''~
a e' 0.'.... .' '. ~
APPLICATION TO THE BOARD OF APPEALS
Nantucket
'\-''So - Lb
To the Members of the Board of Appeals:
The undersigned hereby applies for relief from the terms of the
(ZONING BY-L.~W) (BUILDING CODE) on property described below:
Location of Property O~ \'
\"::. '-0 . U)
~
Lot No.
Plan No. ~ l'J
(I '-\
District is Zoned for
\._'....) \...~1
'.>1.1.. C),,( ~'.l.. /
Type of structure (Existing or Proposed) or proposed use: \" -J ~0
Owner's Name I.') V-"-\\ ~.: \ '-l. 'tI."II.( l \ /Y
Owner's Address ';,\.~\",)~\':.F\
\\.c ),,,,,'~ .
When did you acquire this property?
\'\ l ~
Has application been filed at Building Department?
\.......... i,J
Sectlon,
';l,,- .~L
\j\iLl~ 't_j~",,-\.t,,1.;>
,J\ \\
O~ G. 'l c;2,,-\ ~
(::'il...:'--,b ...) -1',.;, :..? . ,:U\.j '\'~ ~,)') ,. '-
\. - \ -\ ... "\ \\:-
Signature of applicant ,j , "
ATTACH: (1) A list of the names and addresses of each abutting owner and
owner abutting the abutters.
(2) Check in the amount of $50.00 made payable to the Town of
Nantucket.
(3) Map or plan showing the location of the property to be
considered.
(4) If theapplif,antis other thaD the owner, please indicate your
authority to make th,.'<l1J)phcation.- -~
BOARD'S DECISION
Application submitted to Board
.~ dvertising dates
Hearing date lo/Jr
Decision of Board
Decision filed with the Town Clerk
~-
1..'".__
In the matter of Robert C. Murray, et ux (039-78), Attorney
Michael Driscoll appeared for the petitioner and stated the
Murrays wish to expand a non-conforming use on land on Atlantic
Avenue. The property presently contains four rental cottages and
they would like a Special Permit to add an additional four cottages
for rental purposes. He stated this use would not be substantially
more detrimental to the neighborhood. He also stated it was
uneconomical to operate at the present capacity of four cottages
due to the increasing maintenance cost in relation to the potential
return. He also mentioned the possibility of providing winterized
cottages for school teachers in the area.
Mr. Murray also spoke in favor of his petition. The Board
requested the size and location of the buildings.
Mr. Wayne Jacquith commented in opposition that four
cottages and an additional house would be an excessive request in
light of the notice relating to four cottages only.
There were no other speakers and no correspondence except
a letter from the Planning Board recommending unfavorable action
on the Special Permit.
The Board requested Mr. Driscoll to submit plans showing
the size and location of the proposed buildings.
The Board then took the matter under advisement, the plans
to be submitted by Decewber 30, 1978.
In the matter of the petition of William Yarmy (038-78),
Mrs. Cahoon retired from the Board and Associate Member, John L.
McLaughlin sat on the Board.
The petitioner was represented by Attorney Richard Glidden
who requested a variance to construct a house off Pocomo Road on
Lot 20, Land Court Plan No. l6220-A, which house would exceed the
allowable ground cover under Section V. The allowable ground
cover of this one-acre lot is l,429 square feet, and the house
requested would cover 2,784 square feet.
The petitioner is suffering a hardship in that he is being
deprived of the proper use of his property. He has owned this
land since 1974 and has recently sold his home in Sconset.
Although the house will exceed the ground cover by a substantial
amount, the majority of this excess is accounted for by the pro-
posed garage, which will have no living area or plumbing facilities.
He stated that the Board has traditionally excluded garages from
computations of ground cover. In addition, the property is
located in a sparsely populated neighborhood and is bounded on
two sides by property will be preserved for conservation purposes.
It was noted that the 3-acre zoning applicable to the
majority of Pocorno permits only a 3% ground cover, which creates
an unusually small hou~e on a l-acre lot.
There were no persons heard in opposition to the petition.
Letters were received in support of the petition from Nantucket
Planning Board, Christine Carter, Albertand Amy Brock, and John
and Loretta Mendonca, being all the immediate neighbors of the
property.
mkn n"~rA ~nn~ ~h~ n~tition under advisement.
., , ~
.// -
/y
/-
....----'
Ii
I
Ii
II There beinq no further business to come before the b,
"
ion motion duly made and seconded, the meeting adjourned.
I'
I
r
'\~~~~'-~ \~\ ~~ \"l,
~~ ~~ \..............
~.~~
\ ~~--- . - ~
\
BOARD OF APPEALS
,/) / rj
i '{dc.)1: /c,~~~7
,
.~ -j
/, ~ {rlt . 1<. ~~)d~7.:L-r .f(
~ ---' #~"""'I
-/
(
;y~ J
V.,;A-!?;,f ~. G-L.-F-.-<-'
~+-l