Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout026-78 In the mat er 01 the'petitior' 01 Allee Carey \\llllalll,=>, U':'~-IU. Aft eviewed t e minut s of the meeting of September 19 d the his ory of he subdivision and conveyance The 1978 and made the the Bard found: tX{{P 73 stantia that purchase as to use was a - the us l. was a no and dime nulled b factor, 2. event the the loss itioner ming lot r a peri cis ion of s preser itioner this lot tantial f ship in hough t n years achuset that the lot a be guar ntee The d cisio s court , and On motion m de by Member Bartsch and seconded by Member Hyde, it was unanimously voted to grant the variance. ~F~ In the matter of the petition of David Murray et ux, 026-78: The Board reviewed the minutes of the meeting of September 19, 197 and received the report of the inspection of the property. After due deliberation the Board found: 1. The relief sought by the petitioner could be granted with out any detriment to neighborhood properties and within the scope of relief anticipated by the by-law; 2. The garage addition would contain no living area and woul not affect the density factors in this area; and, 3. The petitioner has a hardship in that his personal pro- perty is without adequate safeguard and his delivery of fuel oil cannot be maintained without other facilities as now exist on the property. On motion of Member Hyde and seconded by Member Bartsch, it was unanimously voted to grant the variance. ~c In the matter of the petition of Harvey L. Pasten, Trustee, 025-78: The Board reviewed the minutes of the meeting of Septembe 19, 1978 and received the reports of the members who had visited the locus. , """''''_ t..__ A "nnl"'\rr"rann;~_ u ~ IfrvrV- In the matter of the petition of David Murray, 026-78: Attor- ney Richard Glidden appeared for the petitioner. Mr. Glidden stated that this was a rehearing on a prior application made by Philip C. Murray et ux and that the Planning Board had consented to a rehear- ing. Mr. Glidden stated that the petitioner owns land at Monomoy Road, which is presently improved with a single-family dwelling unit. The lot size is 36,202 sq. ft., and the present ground co- ver exceeds the allowed cover. The area is zoned to allow five percent ground cover, and the improvements now occupy 6.5% of the area. The petitioner desires to construct a garage building of ap- proximately 24' in width and 24' in depth and to use the same for storage of his automobiles and equipment. At the present time ther are no storage facilities or garage facilities on the site. In ad- dition, the petitioner was been advised that oil delivery to his house, made prior to this time by the means of a rear access road ver private property, will be cut off by denial of continued use f the rear access road and that his need for access from Monomoy Road is now crucial for the continued supply of oil. The petitione -3- ---......1.-.,..--___ stated that he would not have any living quarters in the garage facility and would use it solely for storage and safe keeping of equipment. Letters were presented by Mr. Glidden from all abutters stat- ing that they had no objection to the garage addition. Mr. Philip Murray appeared and stated that he owned land op- posite the locus and that he had no objection to the petition. Mr. Murray also stated that he was the former owner and that the pre- mises had always been insufficient by reason of the lack of a gar- age. There was no oPposition to the petition. The chairman read a letter from the Planning Board advising the Board of Appeals that the Planning Board recommended the peti- tion be granted. The Board advised Attorney Glidden that the matter would be taken under consideration pending a view of the premises. /~'~ 6J.IG~ ~. . ~~~ /0 JYI ,., ~ Lf'.[)O ~m. 13al~ 'L. ,€. .;(otc:J.c".~ g<t4J.ot. -r~ ~ 1""\1=' -.L Od& --7 ~ FEE ~::;i) .1)0 Case No. APPLICATION TO THE BOARD OF L~.PPEjI.LS Nantucket August " ~", 1078 To the Members of the Board of Appeals: The undersigned hereby applies for relief from the terms of the (ZOl'JIN~ BY-LAW) (BUILDING CODE) on property described below: :16, .,7 ilnd 47 ~!onomoy Road, Nantucket, >Iass. Cert. of Title ~o. 5445 Plan No. 1()9.'7!' (36) (37) (-17) Pl. 10937- Location of Property Lot No. District is Zoned for Rcsirlential Use - LlJC Type of structure (Existing or Proposed) or proposed use: (;angc Owner's ]\lame ([ ntcndcd Owner) David 'I. 'Iurray Owner's Address Present Address- Walsh Street, >;antucket. :!ass. Vv'hen did you acquire this property? Contingent upon appeal resul ts Has application been filed at Building Department? No - has been \1i th flDC P as any previous appeal been made? :\0 Section of By-law or Code from which relief is requested: Intensity - Sec. ~ )'Ieason for asking relief: There is no storage space or garal'(e on prer.liees and the l,:resent on ground access to rear of property where Oil truck services fuel oil tan,k is over private property which applicant is on notice will not be allowed afti.~r the end of Sept. Present variance would provide for storage and g;> rage and tt,':e dri veway wou I d provide access to fuel oi 1 tank. David II. 'l11rrJJY / By his atto;f~y ~.' > Signatur.e o~.a2Plican.t ~~::'i':~ ~.( ~/:'.-'. -> . /' . ames K. ..J:j en, [:sq. ,\ TT ~CIl: (1) A list of the name~9.Pa-.c;'>~e.ss-e-s-'Of-;;~Ch abdlt[rftfBWn~t-. sn'ifntlld owner abutting th~abutters. (2) Check in the amount of $50.00 made pa:)'!able to the Town of Nantucket. (3) Map or plan showing the location of the property to be considered. (4) If the applicant is other than the owner, please indicate your authority to make this application. BOARD'S DECISION C\.pplication submitted to Board !\dvertising dates Hearing date Decision of Board fled,::io!) filed with the Town Clerk ~'-s"'...~~ ~\...S"l'LC. ~.\___ --~ -\ .. c, ~. '.. .. fy,