HomeMy WebLinkAbout068-05
TOWN OF NANTUCKET
BOARD OF APPEALS
NANTUCKET, MASSACHUSETTS 02554
Date: J!1Q~€m her h 2000
To: Parties in Interest and Others concerned with the
- uDeClslon6f the BOARD O~ APPEALS in the Application of the
following:
Application No.: C!JtefS.-O:5'
Owner/Applicant: Rd0ed D. cSOrn:\bn Om
[OCr i7cPa ;3. GorrrsCJY1
Enclosed is the Decision of the BOARD OF APPEALS which has
this day been filed in the office of the Nantucket Town
Clerk.
An Appeal from this Decision may be taken pursuant to
section 17 of Chapter 40A, Massachusetts General Laws.
Any action appealing the Decision must be brought by
filing an complaint in court within TWENTY (20) days after
this day's date. Notice of the action with a copy of the
com.laint and certified copy of the necision must be given
to the Town Clerk so as to be received within such TWENTY
( 20) days.
cc: Town Clerk
Planning Board
Building Commissioner
PLEASE NOTE: MOST SPECIAL PERMITS AND VARIANCES HAVE A TIME
LIMIT AND WILL EXPIRE IF NOT ACTED UPON ACCORDING-TO NANTUCKET
ZONING BY-LAW ~139-30I (SPECIAL PERMITS); 9139-321 (VARIANCES)
ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE CALL THE NANTUCKET ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS.
-_..
,I
AMENDED
NANTUCKET ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
1 East Chestnut Street
Nantucket, Massachusetts 02554
11 Union Street, Nantucket
Assessor's Map 42.3.1, Parcel 44
Residential-Old Historic
Deed Book 333, Page 129
No plan on record
DECISION:
1. At public hearings of the Nantucket Zoning Board of Appeals,
opened on Friday, October 14, 2005, continued to November 18, 2005 for further
discussion, and concluded on January 6, 2006, at 1:00 P.M., in the Conference
Room in the Town Annex Building, 37 Washington Street, Nantucket,
Massachusetts, the Nantucket Zoning Board of Appeals made a Decision on the
Application (068-05) of ROBERT D. GARRISON AND LUCINDA B.
GARRISON, of 11 Union Street, Nantucket, MA 02554, in connection with
property known as 11 Union Street, Nantucket, Massachusetts. The Decision
was appealed in the action Sibley v. Waine, et al, Nantucket Superior Court Civil
Action No. 06-05. At further public hearing of the Nantucket Zoning Board of
Appeals on Friday, December 8,2006, the Nantucket Zoning Board of Appeals
modified the Decision in BOA File No. 068-05. The modified Decision of the
Board of Appeals is as follows:
2. Applicants are seeking relief by SPECIAL PERMIT under
Nantucket Zoning By-law Section 139-33A (alteration/ expansion of pre-
existing/ nonconforming use/structure). Applicants proposed to alter the
nonconforming use of the property, three dwelling units on one lot, by
renovating the existing duplex structure in the main building by relocating one
unit to the existing cottage and converting that structure into a duplex, thus
maintaining three dwelling units. An existing garage structure would be
demolished to provide room to expand the cottage. The height of the cottage
would increase within the required five-foot setback areas but would come no
closer to the lot lines than the existing structure. The new addition, constituting
the increase in ground cover, would be conforming as to setbacks. As part of the
project the main structure would also be renovated. Applicants are also seeking
relief by SPECIAL PERMIT under Nantucket Zoning By-law Section 139-33E(2).
As part of the renovation and expansion of the cottage, Applicants are asking to
increase the ground cover from about 41 % to no more than 50%, which is
allowed by a grant of special permit relief for sub minimum lots in the ROH
zoning district. One parking space is currently provided on site. Applicants
propose to add a second parking space if possible. The lot is nonconforming as
to lot size, with the lot containing about 4,400 square feet of area in a district that
requires a minimum lot size of 5,000 square feet; as to ground cover with the lot
containing about 41 % ground cover ratio in a district that allows a maximum
ground cover for undersized lots of 30%; as to setback, with the main house
being sited as close as about one foot from the southerly side yard lot line, and
the cottage being sited as close as about one foot from the westerly rear yard lot
line and about two feet from the northerly side yard lot line, in a district that
requires a minimum side and rear yard setback of five feet; as to parking with
the lot having one parking space where there are three required; as to use, with
there being three dwelling units on the property, rather than a maximum of two
as allowed in this district.
The Premises are located at 11 UNION STREET, Assessor's Map 42.3.1,
Parcel 44, no plan on record, Deed Book 333, Page 129. The property is zoned
Residential-Old Historic.
3. Our Decision is based upon the Application and accompanying
materials, affidavits, representations and testimony received at our public
hearings. The Planning Board made a negative recommendation. Over the
several hearings, an email was received from an abutter immediately to the west
in opposition to the height and massing of the originally proposed new cottage;
two letters were submitted from the direct abutter to the south and members of
the abutter's family appeared on her behalf expressing concerns about the size of
the proposed structure, parking and intensity of use, as well as unrelated issues
concerning the exact location of the common property line with the Locus and
the stability of the rear retaining wall below the embankment; and the direct
abutters to the north spoke against the Application, in person and through
counsel about concerns related to density of use on the property and negative
impact on the traffic situation in the neighborhood. The file also contained a
letter from the Applicants in which all of the changes that had been made since
the previous two hearings were outlined. The Applicants listed the names and
addresses of several nearby abutters that were not opposed to the project.
4. There was an Affidavit in the file from the predecessor-in-title that
verified that the property contained three separate dwelling units from a time
prior to the 1972 enactment of the Zoning By-law and prior to when the
Applicants purchased the property in 1989. The Affidavit also stated that the
structures had been in their present locations prior to 1972. The location of the
primary structure and the cottage was also verified by aerial photographs
contained in the Town records from 1938 and 1957. Such information was not
challenged at the hearing. Having reviewed this information and hearing no
contradictory evidence from any source, the Board found that the use of this
property for three dwellings was a validly grandfathered, pre-existing, non-
conforming use and proceeded with the hearing.
5. Applicants, through counsel and personal testimony, stated that
the existing improvements on the property are shown on the "Mortgage Plot
Plan" (the "plan") dated September 6, 1989, prepared by Nantucket Surveyors,
Inc., a reduced a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit A. The existing
primary wood frame dwelling situated on the south side of the Locus currently
2
contains two dwelling units (referred to herein as the "primary structure") and is
sited as close as I.:!:. foot from the southerly property line. The existing one-story
cottage is situated in the northwesterly corner of the Locus (referred to herein as
the" cottage structure"), contains a third dwelling unit and is sited as close as I.:!:.
feet from the northerly property line and 2.:!:. feet from the westerly property line,
according to the attached plan. There is also a garage situated on the north side
of the Locus that the Applicants are proposing to demolish. The total ground
cover ratio of all structures on the Locus is currently about 41 % according to the
plan. According to the plan, the Locus contains about 4,400 square feet of lot
area; with there being no recorded plan of the Locus. Applicants stated that a
review of the surrounding Union Street area indicated that lot sizes, placement of
dwellings and parking areas was comparable to the Locus. In addition, said
review showed that only two lots were conforming as to minimum lot size and
most contained ground cover rations far in excess of the maximum allowed for
subminimum lots of 30% and 50% for conforming lots in the ROH zoning
district. The property was also serviced by town water and sewer and thus there
was no other limitation on number of bedrooms on the site.
6. Applicants, through counsel and personal testimony, stated that
they purchased the property in 1989 and have lived in the primary structure
year-round since then. Applicants represented that when they bought the
property the primary structure had been used more like a lodging house with
several rooms used as bedrooms. They reduced the intensity of use in the
primary structure and maintained the existing cottage structure with little
changes. They have rented the apartment located in the primary structure as
well as the dwelling unit in the cottage structure located to the rear of the lot.
Applicants stated that they needed to undertake a substantial renovation of the
historic primary structure and needed to move out of the structure to do so. They
wished to remove the garage structure from the property and enlarge and
renovate the existing cottage structure to accommodate their family of four in
one new unit and upgrade the current one-bedroom unit in the existing
structure. The lot would continue to contain three separate dwelling units with
there being one in the primary structure and two in the cottage structure, with
the relocation of the apartment in the primary structure to the cottage structure,
with an increase in number of bedrooms from six to nine. One parking space
had historically been provided on site and the Applicants proposed to provide
two conforming spaces on the property to help mitigate the parking situation in
the neighborhood, as many other properties did not have on site parking and
parked on the street. Applicants were asking the Board to define a building
envelope and not restrict the design elements as they had not applied to the
Nantucket Historic District Commission ("HDC") for approval of the design.
Applicants explained that they had felt that going to the Zoning Board of
Appeals prior to going to the HDC would be prudent given the costs of
architectural plans should the Board alter the proposal or deny the requested
relief.
3
7. The Board expressed concerns related to intensity of use, density of
structures on the lot, parking, setback intrusions, massing of the proposed
cottage structure, and actual size of the lot. In response to such concerns and
suggestions of the Board and abutters expressed at the several public hearings on
the Application, the Applicants made several changes to their initial submission.
At the third public hearing, Applicants presented their proposal to renovate the
primary structure into a single-family dwelling with a maximum of four
bedrooms. The kitchen would be removed from the apartment space and the one
bedroom dwelling unit would be relocated to the cottage structure, maintaining
a maximum of the three dwelling units on the site. The southerly portion of the
cottage structure would be removed from the site and the remaining
nonconforming northerly portion of the cottage structure containing about 160
square feet of ground cover would be relocated to a site so as to conform to the
setback requirements. It would then be renovated and expanded in order to
maintain the existing unit and accommodate the relocated one-bedroom unit
from the primary structure. The expansion and renovation of the cottage
structure would result in above ground floors that would be dedicated to one
dwelling unit with a maximum of three bedrooms and a separate basement
dwelling unit with a maximum of one bedroom. Due to the Applicants'
agreement to relocate the remaining portion of the cottage structure, the
necessity for relief to expand the cottage structure within the required setback
areas is eliminated. The existing garage would be demolished with the
expanded cottage structure to be sited substantially on that site, and the
Applicants further agree not to expand the footprint of the relocated, renovated
and expanded cottage structure beyond a maximum ground cover of 880 square
feet and construct the new addition so as to have a maximum ridge height of no
more than 25 feet above mean grade, with the remaining portion of the cottage
structure to have a maximum ridge height above mean grade of 15 feet. The
cottage structure would be conforming as to setback requirements in all respects.
The Board finds that these design constraints would ensure that the structures on
the site would retain the massing relationship between the primary structure on
the Locus, and the expanded and renovated cottage structure and would be in
keeping with the neighborhood.
8. Applicants further agreed to restrict the use of the two dwelling
units in the cottage structure to year-round occupancy and agreed to the
imposition of same as a condition of the grant of special permit relief. The Board
expressed that imposing the condition as to year-round occupancy was an
important factor in their willingness to grant the requested relief. Applicants
represented that although the Locus is grandfathered for one parking space,
Applicants would, as a condition of the grant of relief, provide two conforming
parking spaces, in the location shown on the Proposed Site Plan, which is Exhibit
A as marked up by the Applicants, a reduced copy of which is attached hereto as
Exhibit B. Applicants further agreed to reduce the number of bedrooms
contained on the lot from the originally proposed nine to a total of eight, four in
the primary structure, one in the basement apartment and three in the other
dwelling unit.
4
s
SlU<3w<3J!nb<3J >I::mql<3S IPOl Ol WJOjUOJ IIBl{s 'p<3pUBdX<3 pUB p<3lB1\OU<3J
'P<3lBJOI<3J SB 'sHun '3UHl<3Mp OMl '3U!U!BlUOJ <3JnpnllS <3'3BllOJ <3ql (J)
~pJBOg S!l{l WOJj j<3H<3J J<3l{llnj jO <3JU<3SqB <3l{l U! 'suoqBln'3<3~
l{lIB<3H jO pJBogl<3>IJnlUBN jO UMol IBJOI <3ql JO <3poJ '3u!Pung
<3lBlS sll<3Snl{JBSSBW <3ql jO Slu<3w<3J!nb<3J <3ql J<3pun "WOOJp<3q"
B SB AHlBnb IIBl{s <3JnpnJlS <3l{l u~ SlliOOJ J<3l{lO OU pUB SWOOJp<3q
<3<3Jl{l UBl{l <3JOlli lOU qHM sJOog J<3ddn <3ql uo l~un '3UHl<3Mp
<3lBJBd<3s B pUB WOOJp<3q <3UO UBql <3JOlli lOU qHM l!un '3UHl<3Mp
lU<3lli<3SBq B U!BlUOJ IIBqs 'sHun '3uHl<3Mp OMl '3U!U~BlUOJ <3JnpnllS
B OlU~ p<3pUBdX<3 pUB p<3lB1\OU<3J 'P<3lBJOI<3J SB '<3JnpnJlS <3'3BllOJ <3l{l (q)
~Hun U<3l{JH>I <3UO U~BlUOJ lHM
<3JnpnllS AJBllipd <3l{llBl{l OS lU<3llillBdB <3l{l WOJj p<31\OW<3J <3q IIBqs
Hun U<3qJH>I <3l{l pUB 'SlliOOJP<3q JnOj UBql <3JOlli lOU qHM '3UHl<3Mp
AUlliBj-<3I'3U!S B OlU~ p<3lB1\OU<3J <3q IIBl{s <3JnpnllS AJBWpd <3l{l (B)
:SUOmpUOJ '3U!MOIIOj <3l{l uodn p<3SBq P<3lUBJ'3
Aq<3J<3l{ S~ j<3H<3~ 'l<3<3j <3JBnbs 088 uBql <3JOlli lOU jO IBlOl B Ol <3JnpnllS <3'3BllOJ <3ql
'3u!pUBdx<3 J<31\OJ punoJ'3 U! <3SB<3JJU~ <3l{l MOIIB Ol (Z)m::E-6E1 UO~p<3S J<3pun pUB
~sHun '3UHl<3Mp OMl U!BlUOJ Ol snJ01 <3l{l UO <3JnpnJlS <3'3BllOJ <3ql jO UO!SUBdX<3
pUB uoqBJOI<3J pUB '<3JnpnllS <3'3BllOJ <3ql Ol <3JnpnllS AJBllipd <3qllliOJj Hun
lU<3llilJBdB <3l{l jO uoQBJOI<3J '<3JnpnJlS AJBllipd <3ql jO uOqB1\OU<3J MOIIB Ol VEE-6E1
UO~p<3S MBI-Ag '3u~uoZ l<3>IJDlUBN J<3pun lIW~Hd lYIJHdS Aq j<3H<3J p<3ls<3nb<3J
<3ql SlNY~~ '<3l01\ SflOWINVNfl B Aq 'SIB<3ddy jO pJBOg <3l{l '01
'pOOl{Joql{'3!<3U <3l{l U! P<3lUBJ'3
j<3H<3J JBUW!S qHM '3u!d<3<3>I U! <3q PlnoM j<3H<3J jO lUBJ'3 B pUB slOI Wnlli!U!wqns
JOj %OE jO <3lqBMolIB <3l{l jO SS<3JX<3 U~ SOqBJ J<31\OJ punoJ'3 ql~M 'slol J<3IIBWS
lOU H 'P<3Z!S APBUlli!S jO p<3spdwOJ S~ B<3JB <3ql SB pooqJOqq'3~<3U '3u~punoJJns
<3ql OlIBlU<3lli!ll<3P <3JOlli AIIBquBlsqns <3q lOU PlnoM % U lnoqB lliOJj %L.v
lnoqB UBl{l SS<31 Ol J<31\OJ punoJ'3 <3ql '3U!SB<3JJU! pUB l<3<3j <3JBnbs 088 jO WnW!XBW
B U!BlUOJ PlnoM lBql <3JDlJnJlS <3'3BllOJ B MOIIB Ol J<31\OJ punoJ'3 U! <3SB<3JJU!
<3l{llBl{l spuB pJBog <3l{l J<3qllnd 'slU<3w<31\OJdlli! pUB S<3sn '3U!WJOjUOJUOU
'3uqS!X<3-<3Jd AIPHB1\ <3l{l UBl{l pooqJOql{'3~<3U <3ql Ol IBlU<3W!ll<3P <3JOW AIIBquBlsqns
<3q lOU PlnoM 'sl!un '3UHl<3Mp OMl U!BlUOJ U<3ql PlnoM lBql '<3JDlJnllS <3'3BllOJ
p<3pUBdX<3 pUB p<3lB1\OU<3J 'P<3lBJOI<3J <3ql Oll! '3uqBJOI<3J pUB Hun '3UHl<3Mp pJ!ql
<3ql '3U!1\Olli<3J Aq '<3JnpnJlS AJBllipd <3ql Ol S<3'3UBqJ p<3sodoJd <3qllBl{l spuB oSIB
pJBog <3l{l 'SUOmpUOJ MOI<3q <3l{l UO p<3SBq 'UOmppB UI 'AJUBdnJJo pUnOJ-JB<3A Ol
p<3P~llS<3J <3q PlnoM sHun <3qllBl{l <3JnSU<3 PlnoM lBl{l <3JDlJnllS <3'3BllOJ <3ql u~ sHun
'3UHl<3Mp OMl <3l{l UO p<3S0dlli~ <3q PlnoM UOmpUOJ B ''3u!snoq pUnOJ-JB<3A p<3p<3<3U
-qJnlli Alddns pUB B<3lB UMOlUMOP <3ql jO l<3pBlBqJ IBquap~sal aql jO '3u~u~BlU~Blli
al{l J<3qllnj Ol pUB ~aHs uo p<3lBaJJ <3q PlnoM saJBds '3U!>IJBd '3U!lliJOjUOJ OMl
~p<3lBU!WH<3 <3q PlnoM SB<3JB >IJBql<3S lOOj-a1\B paJ~nb<3J <3l{l U~qHM a'3BllOJ '3uqs!xa
aql jO '3ums al{l Ol p<3lBlaJ AHlliJOjUOJUOU aql SB 'pooqJOqq'3~au <3ql OllB<3uaq
B aq PlnoM aJaqllBql sPUB pJBOg al{l ''3u~o'3<3JOj aql uodn pasBg '6
9
.,/
'06 0 I C 18 P 3 :24
;
TO''j~ I
In
900Z'if laqillaJaQ :p<3lBQ
'alnpnllS AJBillpd aql
illOlj uaqJH>I B jO IBAOill<3l <3ql Ol JOpd S'3UHl<3MP OMl Ol alnpnllS <3'3BllOJ <3ql jO
uo!suBdxa aql '3U!MOIIB SB panllSUOJ aq IIBqs l{dBJ'3BlBd S!l{l U! '3U!l{lOU pap!AOld
'<3lnpnllS AUB JOj AJUBdnJJO jO <3lBJHqlaJ B jO aJUBnSS! aql '3u~puBlsqHMlOU
'Hilll<3d IBp<3dS S!l{l jO lU<3WPBU<3 <3lDlqSUOJ IIBqs U!<3lal{ p<3qpJS<3p
pa~OJd aql jO uoqJOd AUB jO UOqBAOU<3l lO /pUB UO!pnllSUOJ 'UOmIOill<3p
jO lU<3W<3JUaW1UOJ AI<3illq lU<3nbasqns al{l pUB l!Wl<3d IBp<3dS S!ql l<3pUn
lIilllad '3UIPUnq B jO '3UIU~BlqO al{l 'aillIl B lB '3u~Punq auo alBAOUal pUB SaS~illald
aql uo S<3lnpnllS <3WOS qSHOW<3P Ol p<3<3JOld SlUBJHddy <3l{llUaA<3 aql UI 'Il
'AJUBdnJJo pUnOl-lB<3A Ol paP!llS<3l
S! <3lDlJnllS <3<3BnOJ <3ql U! Sl!Un '3UHl<3Mp qlOq jO AJUBdnJJO (<3)
pUB ~g l!q!qXH
SB olalaq p<3l{JBnB S! qJ~qM jO AdOJ paJnpal B 'SlUBJHddy aql Aq dn
pa>IlBill UBld aHs paSOdOld al{l uo UMOqS uoqBJOI <3ql AHB!:j.UBlsqns
U~ 'SnJ01 <3ql uo pap~AOld aq IIBqs saJBds '3UI>IlBd '3U!illlOjUOJ OMl (p)
'apBl'3 UBaill aAoqB laaj SZ paaJXa lOU saop lBl(llq'3~aq
<3'3pp B aABl{ HBl{S alDlJnllS <3'3BllOJ aql Ol UOmppB aql pUB 'apBl'3
UB<3W <3AOqB l<3<3j Sl P<3<3JX<3 lOU S<30p lBqllq'3!<3q <3'3pp B <3ABl{ HBqS
pUB pauIBlal aq HBqS <3'3BnOJ IBUI'3PO aql jO uoqlOd lOOj-<3lBnbs 091
lnoqB palBJoI<3l '3u~U~BW<3l <3q.L 'plBOg S!ql WOlj j<3H<3l l<3qllnj jO
aJUasqB al{l u~ laAOJ punol'3 JO ld<3j alBnbs 088 p<3aJx<3 lOU HBqs pUB
<;1(1,/')&>1
;< :L 1'7 """<;:J7'vr><>-f{::r'lo;;rq-
;lo<c ;:is o=s;..PJ">"'" "1'7:,,/ 'fl>^"':?7J.,"'-'9'
;<. <'.9 .<>.I;~'-?,P"""..-.;?
,s. - -:ptJ'l?,,,P ~ I ~f'!9
~....jt - ~,u~r'-..:r
,.95' - ..fo;lJ<U,jj' . ".'N
\/ ..:ts;:oa:><;; "'r r '7 v'h
~v: f::>!7~J7 ~C? rl'lAJ>!~ - 6u~~I?Z
.". ~ Nl-YJHS
\' S'V ~ 3l-lI. NO 51 NV'Li
~ STIlI. NO NffillS ~mma 3H.L
JNH.1 J..!I.UlID Xmi I : aIDN
Ofil~
; ?!3n- 1"
. .x::>lWV
~ X)~ '1Vll::IillLiI 3lU. XII
9B-~-9 :MIJ.?:;w:;I .SS'VW :oaO~'l
'ON ~ ilO'dVH ,J-mIil,. mtLNO
. a:;LI.V:3N:I'm S'V :ilNOZ <nNZVH CKXf1[
mIL NllIJJ.l1 cmv.xn J.ON :alIV
NV'Li SIlU NO NroHS ~
3H.I. J.\IH.l 3fXlZ1l'Y)fl)l m .ilO
Js.N 3lU. 01 MLU1ID X\IIDt!IH I
1]~SZO VW 'J3)O!l.IN\lN
A~.^aNlM.~- LE6 XOII 'O'a
':)NI 'Sllox:!llillflS .I.IDOm.tNN
(Ntl (~.'hl"7:.a1VU
,Olc,I'::;rooS
~1~eppp"1 ~ t-'''''I''Z! ~lIQil amNamIcl
. . _ V'1' - /"'];7 :mrm-nN:w1
. <JNIl mJS S .1l0SS3SS'V
''''''''';,1 ~oN ::;t)~ NV'Li
,;t:;1: ~~~i1f/ ~ !iLl"; I~" ~"':.~ a:;uIU
'VW J;r:;Dt)CUNVN
lIT CINVl
.!IO NV'Li J.01<l ~rn
~'8'llt
:;I 1: .
ll-o.'e
i ~Ul'~
~i-~(
] p~
1l1'~1 t'::' .2.'::
~ t .S1 ~
";s'll';;
~ ~ ,:I ~
:tt .
-3 ~ ~ ,:.
-., i: ~ ~
OCUIGUm:mI all Q.1 J.ON . J..'lNO
S3S0cIU0cI ~rn l1Qil NMVl!U
S'V11 NV'IcI snu. 'J.N3.TNI 'lVNTIID1O
S ..LI NVH.1 mIH.1D' :;rsQ(!lli)d
],fN 110 . s:;rn:m-l I S3NTI l.Dl3clO&I
~ 11Qil CUlS{l :ilea 01 JON
'J.3fillilS 3:clV.I.. V 51 SIlU : 3.IDN
to!J:JSep -lJcl/ :up 'If up.'vf7' ~ / ? b,t
1'1iF1 ")=1 J~ "'~ V-<rJ?OU,J II'?'
" ".:.
::;~j:;
-pzz {j L/I;:,.g
VI> "'"'''/.:1 VlIP''I j"Cf .; '!i .. VJ j..<ri't{? ;1/ f'/
.?/-zTZt .
~
U"1:d"HS
J.nlLtS NOINll 11
~.
~
..........
"\J
.2:
\
~ hi
~"
. ~ ~
't~ ~
'i',~ l
'--\ $:
. )J ~
~. ..~
<' ~
J1 ~
~
\l .. i
1;'
~ ~
\l;".. .
l~
D All.....
t :>':'l ~
~~.....\)j
. ~.S-~
l~ti
'\l) fl.
C) ,
'(1 ..
.~. -.-...
...ti!!.r. 1"';.---.
:h..
~
t
.-
~ Cl,
J .~
~ I~
Jlo.,
:1 >:f CAp'P/7 ':' 'D"s~,[7__
(1)
'l
i\j
fti
lh '-
'\
"
0
C)
-I
N
Q)
ill
to
<.n
"
f'.
~.:" .
,-'.
~
O.
, .
~
t' ~
~ f
t-,l~
(k:t1~
~~r1l',
~" U .'~
~ ;t:'"
:::: ~
\lI Y
,~ t
~ ~
r>1I.'-'O ~ "I0I'O/
~
~.
l
f'!
'. .~~ II,
:;r~' F i,' V)
~'7) 2 .
P-~No~ "-
~...I1""
(iJf;T 1ft. Q:":::/9, "%1.
. 'p!; '21 Z~/':r9
C:~/7!.s'7 us>a>rf.'p' II"'-:;S'ncr .::1//'1
. J 01 - I'f'~ ,
- -
?~n-f' .
.. . .~~
JlGmVN\IH Kl~ 'lVlillCIThI 3HI. XII
. . 9a-~-9 :3l\!J.:)3imI 'SS\IH !OEZOSZ
'ON ~ dO 'dVH ,~, mll.NQ.
~ SV :ilNOZ 0lNZVH O<Xn:I
mll NIHJ'.Ii'i a:moo:r J.OO amr
N\'Id SIH.L NO N!1:lHS ~
mu J:\IH.I. ~ m .!IO
.IS:!l1l 3HL OL k!LDI3:) J..micmH I
iJSSZO VW · J3)Oll.INVN
XVM J:.<nIDl S- L~6 XCS:' '0' d
'8NI . Sll6X:irA1J11S J.IDOfUNVN
(Rt, (,.J.J..'7 :.3J.va
,01-.1 ":<rooS
~loU$';?" pvpn1 ~ ~""l"'O :iJai! amIlfdIDld
. . _' 7P - 1"'~'" '1riI\IWfIN:r.a1.
: CINV .T.mlHS S I 'UOSS:!ISSV
" .. "'r"-;t ~ON :IDNml3.rnI NV'ld.
.,-,:' "'CdiS..~..Ag~~Lf".J/~~ ,,~r~~ mr:Ia
. VH '.IIDJ:}flIN\IN
NI <INV'I
.irO NV1d JC1Id ~Gl
.--;.....
......
~.
".'
f
ii.l.......
.;"j-'
'..
~,
~.
U"ld "~lS
J.lllUs NOlllJ1 n
~.
<
.........
'.()
'.<-
.. :~ 1.
o f1J
~"
'. -t ~
:.tl () ; .
. ~~ ~
t~ .~.
rj ~
~ fIl
~ "i;.
.~
:tI. III
,~: i
~
0-
.~.
<8'<'~
.;;: :L '/7 ~ f'Vf'C-li.;:r7<;.rq-
~~.f" ;:i<;. 0=,$ -'7'LH> "}'7 .~ ..a;~/,"n""9'
;X. P:9 ....;r'V'........-:;> ,,c"""'J-;/
,S; - -:pI>'1;'''~ -'PP-/ I "r!~
........;r - '?J"'I'f.pf: r"".1'
,p.s: - ,t:..;.~.:t . ".'H
\/ ~s: ~9 n,&" 17 V'h
0,tr' f~.'7>P/ /'W rl"?~~'" - b..,:~"Z
<:r -:;...- 'Nl'DHS
(" ~ ~ 3111 NO SI NV1d
c-> SIll1 NO NnJllS :NI:GTIfl\I :ilIl.1
lVlU MLDJ3:) }'\GU3H I : 3.I.ON
~ ~'E ~
,.~ ]:- ~:E
.t:J - :l ::t E
~ l ;~ ~
.'~ Ii.t.;!....
.:~. : -~ ~ t .E ~
..~~- ~~..~ ~
.' .... ~ t
,:> ~ ~ ('
'C13<nIO::J.:IU ~IT Q.l.ICt<. 'J..1NO
S:!IS0dlll1:I Dl:ID]G,J 1lCli! Nl'lVlla
SVl1 NV1d SIIl.l . IN:IDIT lVNWnIO
. S. J.I NVIU mnu.o 3SOdlli1J
1J;N 110 '~I 'S3NI'I J..ImdOUd:
~l1V.IS:il 'UCli! CI3Sll aIT OL .ION
'X3lIW1S 3dVl. V s:;: snu : 3.lON
;'d{.J.JS0,o -lJol/ 'J'" 'If '''.'1.//7 ~ / 1 6,
/,1.1/1 ~1l':>1 -'if ~-I" v"",POtu /1'7
~.~
i
'0)
........\
~
!h.
I
C) :
Cl
-I
N
0>
m !i
tSi ~'
,.,
~
. . '!l----! It,
'1''tI ' " \,{)
. ':r!"~ ~ .i".
:5>l'Yo-.(
~...
...,9
'f
)::.
~"
~.
t
~
\)\,
.}
:)-
Cli
....
J{
-l:l
R.....
~-
,6'~
r----i
I I
I I
I I
I I
J
I I
.., J I.
I L L_.,'
I ---,
I
I
I
~I
I
I
I
"'.. L_____J
m
)<
~ri~.~~-~--- - --
~_iz--.J:t:."
(J)~~.~~~
PG')g(/)~O
""Tlnt.f)PC;Z
',' p::j ~
I ::j'
I .
l_________
"1.
~,:;;:/'O~ """':I
''''''f:t$f'~
-as ~ €i: -;ig =/d ~, "..~t" ~ ""':7.
Gg' ~ ~Ii. L4>/d.
. .: 1'9'~ Z~/';rS
(;;/715"7 vP"'I'/' 'P' //'D<:'-'ncr .::IllY
. )0) - n'z:t
t'
~ '>\-
\l. ..
~~.
~ =".() i'.,
~ 't.:-t ~
~\..<ro.::'''u.,
-1>.........
I:lo::h ,
!~r&
\D
<>
\.D
~
fl
'"
..
"
b' ~
~ if
th-
1;, ~
~~;}~
~\ ;;: ~ ~
-t"S~
\I ~
~ ~N
" 111
" )'
\1, t
~ >;-
i) ..
~
ARTHUR I, READE, JR" P.C.
KENNETH A, GULLICKSEN
MARIANNE HANLEY
WHITNEY A, GIFFORD
READE, GULLICKSEN, HANLEY & GIFFORD, LLP
SIX YOUNG'S '\VAY
NANTUCKET, MASSACHUSETTS 02554
508-228-3128
FAX: 508-228-5630
MAILING ADDRESS
POST OFFICE BOX 2669
NANTUCKET,MASS.02584
STEVEN L, COHEN
February 9, 2006
By Hand
Catherine Flanagan Stover, Town Clerk
Town Building, 16 Broad Street
Nantucket, Massachusetts
Re: Civil Action No. 06-05
near Mrs. Stover:
Enclosed for filing are a copy of the complaint and notice
of filing that were filed with the Superior Court on February 9,
7-006 in the above-referenced case,
Sincerely,
L~~U-L-/ ../UU-
Kenneth A. Gullicksen
Enclosure
CC: Elizabeth B, Sibley
Emily Avery
''': \ \\I}1:; \:;ibley~ Liddle \Union \GarrisonZBA \clerkl tr. doc
Nantucket, ss,
COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS
Superior Court
Civil Action
No, 0/;-'-0
ELIZABETH B, SIBLEY, TRUSTEE
OF SIBLEY NOMINEE TRUST
Plaintiff,
v.
DALE W. WAINE,
NANCY J. SEVRENS,
C. RICHARD LOFTIN,
DAVID WILEY and
KERIM KOSEATAC, as they
are the members of the
NANTUCKET BOARD OF APPEALS,
and
ROBERT 0, GARRISON and,
LUCINDA B. GARRISON,
Defendants.
NOTICE OF
FILING
You are hereby notified, pursuant to Section 17 of Chapter
40A of the Laws of Massachusetts, that Elizabeth B, Sibley, as
Trustee of Sibley Nominee Trust, has filed an appeal of a
decision of the Nantucket Board of Appeals dated January 20,
2006 and filed with the Nantucket Town Clerk on January 20,
2006, granting relief by Special Permit to Robert 0, Garrison
and Lucinda B. Garrison.
Dated:
February 9, 2006
Respectfully submitted,
Elizabeth B. Sibley
as Trustee as aforesaid,
Plaintiff
By her attorney,
~~~u~-4t'a
Kenneth A. Gullicksen
BBO# 550765
Reade, Gullicksen, Hanley
& Gifford, LLP
Post Office Box 2669
Nantucket, MA 02584
Tel. (508) 228-3128
t':\WpS\Sibley-Liddle\Union\GarrisonZBA\Notice.do~
COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS
Nantucket, ss,
Superior Court
Civil Action
No, 0"-05
ELIZABETH B, SIBLEY, TRUSTEE
OF SIBLEY NOMINEE TRUST
Plaintiff,
v,
DALE W. WAINE,
NANCY J. SEVRENS,
C. RICHARD LOFTIN,
DAVID WILEY and
KERIM KOSEATAC, as they
are the members of the
NANTUCKET BOARD OF APPEALS,
and
ROBERT D, GARRISON and,
LUCINDA B. GARRISON,
Defendants,
COMPLAINT
1, The plaintiff, Elizabeth B. Sibley, Trustee of Sibley
Nominee Trust (Sibley), is the record owner of the property at 9
Union Street, Nantucket, Massachusetts (the Sibley Property) by
virtue of a deed recorded with Nantucket Registry of Deeds In
Book 556, Page 29,
2. The defendants, Dale W. Waine, Nancy J. Sevrens, C.
Richard Loftin, David Wiley and Kerim Koseatac (the "Board of
Appeals"), are members (in the instance of Wiley and Koseatac
al ternate members) of the Nantucket Board of Appeals, and are
all of the members of the Nantucket Board of Appeals who
participated in the matter which is the subject of this action;
1
they reside
at
the
following addresses,
all
situated in
Nantucket, Nantucket County, Massachusetts:
MEMBER RESIDENTIAL ADDRESS
Dale W. Waine 11 Bishops Rise
Nancy J, Sevrens 24 Vesper Lane
C, Richard Loftin 36 Madaket Road
David Wiley 68 Union Street
Kerim Koseatac 30 North Water Street
3.
The defendants Robert D,
Garrison and Lucinda B,
Garrison ( collectively Garrison), are individuals who reside at
11 Union Street, Nantucket, Nantucket County, Massachusetts (the
Garrison Property).
4, The Sibley Property directly abuts the Garrison
Property,
5, The Garrison Property consists of an undersized lot
which contains a dwelling which also contains a one bedroom
apartment, a separate one bedroom cottage and a garage,
6. Garrison submitted an application to the Board of
Appeals proposing to: renovate the main dwelling by converting
it
into
a
single
family
dwelling;
demolish
the
garage;
substantially expand the size of the cottage and turn it into a
duplex; and expand the ground cover, which already exceeded that
permissible for an undersized lot.
7. Sibley appeared at the hearing of the matter,
personally and through counsel, and objected to the application
2
on various
grounds including that the relief sought exceeded
the authority of the Board and the project, if allowed, would be
substantially more detrimental to the neighborhood than existing
conditions,
8. The Board of Appeals entered a decision dated January
20, 2006, and filed with the Nantucket Town Clerk on January 20,
2006, (a certified copy of which is attached) which subj ect to
certain conditions, grants relief by Special Permit to Garrison,
as owner of the Garrison Property, as follows:
(a)
Under Nantucket
Zoning By-law
(the
"By-law" )
~139-33A,
to
allow
renovation
of
the
primary
structure,
relocation of the apartment unit from the primary structure to
the cottage structure and relocation and expansion of the
cottage structure to contain two dwelling units; and
(b) Under By-law ~139-33E(2) to allow the increase in
ground cover by an additional 880 square feet,
9. The plaintiff is aggrieved by reason of the action of
the Board of Appeals in granting said decision, because said
decision exceeded the authority of the Board of Appeals, was
arbitrary and capricious,
was not justified by the facts
presented before the Board of Appeals and is inconsistent with
the vote taken by the Board,
Wherefore, the plaintiff brings this action pursuant to
M.G.L., c. 40A, ~17, and By-law ~139-30.G, to appeal from the
3
granting of Special Permit relief to Garrison by the Board of
Appeals as set forth above, and requests this Honorable Court to
grant the following relief:
(a) Determining that the decision of the Board of Appeals,
granting Special Permit relief to Garrison in this matter, was
not justified by the facts and exceeded the authority of the
Board of Appeals;
(b) Annulling the decision of the Board of Appeals in this
matter; and
(c) For such other and further relief as this Court shall
deem appropriate,
Dated:
February 9, 2006
Respectfully submitted,
Elizabeth B, Sibley
as Trustee as aforesaid,
Plaintiff
By her attorney,
~->>ti-
Kenneth A, Gullicksen
BBO# 550765
Reade, Gullicksen, Hanley
& Gifford, LLP
6 Young's Way
Post Office Box 2669
Nantucket, MA 02584
Tel. (508) 228-3128
Fax (508)228-5630
r~: \WpS\S ibley- Liddle \Union \GarrisonZBA \Complaint. doc
4
TOWN 'OF NANTUCKET
BO'ARD OF APPEALS
NANTUCKET, MASSACHUSETTS 02554
Date:
J o.nuoV''1 020, 20C!(P
To: Parties in Interest and. Others concerned with the
.._,,- .._.._n-"'DeCISIOn-'oT' the BOARD OF APPEALS in the Application of the
following:
Application No.:
Owner/Applicant:
_( A)C A, &0- F7.
(J~~- OS
~dheY'~ b. G-n.rV1J'~\bv)
G-art'"'I'So 1\
dVlci
Enclosed'is the Decision of the BOARD OF APPEALS which has'
this day been filed in the office of the Nantucket Town
Clerk.
An Appeal from this Decision may be taken pursuant to
Section 17 of Chapter 40A, Massachusetts General Laws,
Any action appealing the Decision must be brought by
filing an complaint in court within TWENTY (20) days after
this day's date. Notice of the action with a copy of the
com~laint and certified copy of the necision must be given
to the Town Clerk so as to be received within such TWENTY
(20) days.
~
Chairman
cc: Town Clerk
Planning Board
Building Commissioner
PLEASE NOTE: MOST SPECIAL PERMITS AND VARIANCES HAVE A TIME
LIMIT AND WILL EXPIRE IF NOT ACTED UPON ACCORDING'TO NANTUCKET
ZONING BY-LAW ~139-30I (SPECIAL PERMITS); ~139-32I (VARIANCES)
ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE CALL THE NANTUCKET ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS,
NANTUCKET ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
1 East Chestnut Street
Nantucket, Massachusetts 02554
11 Union Street, Nantucket
Assessor's Map 42,3,1, Parcel 44
Residential-01d Historic
Deed Book 333, Page 129
No plan on record
DECISION:
1, At public hearings of the Nantucket Zoning Board of Appeals,
opened on Friday, October 14, 2005, continued to November 18, 2005 for further
discussion, and concluded on January 6, 2006, at 1:00 P,M., in the Conference
Room in the Town Annex Building, 37 Washington Street, Nantucket,
Massachusetts, the Nantucket Zoning Board of Appeals made the following
Decision on the Application (068-05) of ROBERT D. GARRISON AND
LUCINDA B. GARRISON, of 11 Union Street, Nantucket, MA 02554, in
connection with property known as 11 Union Street, Nantucket, Massachusetts.
2, Applicants are seeking relief by SPEGAL PERMIT under
Nantucket Zoning By-law Section 139-33A (alteration/ expansion of pre-
existing/nonconforming use/structure). Applicants proposed to alter the
nonconforming use of the property, three dwelling units on one lot, by
renovating the existing duplex structure in the main building by relocating one
unit to the existing cottage and converting that structure into a duplex, thus
maintaining three dwelling units. An existing garage structure would be
demolished to provide room to expand the cottage. The height of the cottage
would increase within the required five-foot setback areas but would come no
closer to the lot lines than the existing structure. The new addition, constituting
the increase in ground cover, would be conforming as to setbacks, As part of the
project the main structure would also be renovated, Applicants are also seeking
relief by SPECIAL PERMIT under Nantucket Zoning By-law Section 139-33E(2),
As part of the renovation and expansion of the cottage, Applicants are asking to
increase the ground cover from about 41 % to no more than 50%, which is
allowed by a grant of special permit relief for sub minimum lots in the ROH
zoning district, One parking space is currently provided on site, Applicants
propose to add a second parking space if possible, The lot is nonconforming as
to lot size, with the lot containing about 4,400 square feet of area in a district that
requires a minimum lot size of 5,000 square feet; as to ground cover with the lot
containing about 41 % ground cover ratio in a district that allows a maximum
ground cover for undersized lots of 30%; as to setback, with the main house
being sited as close as about one foot from the southerly side yard lot line, and
the cottage being sited as close as about one foot from the westerly rear yard lot
line and about two feet from the northerly side yard lot line, in a district that
requires a minimum side and rear yard setback of five feet; as to parking with
the lot having one parking space where there are three required; as to use, with
there being three dwelling units on the property, rather than a maximum of two
as allowed in this district.
The Premises are located at 11 UNION STREET, Assessor's Map 42,3.1,
Parcel 44, no plan on record, Deed Book 333, Page 129. The property is zoned
Residential-Old Historic,
3, Our Decision is based upon the Application and accompanying
materials, affidavits, representations and testimony received at our public
hearings, The Planning Board made a negative recommendation. Over the
several hearings, an email was received from an abutter immediately to the west
in opposition to the height and massing of the originally proposed new cottage;
two letters were submitted from the direct abutter to the south and members of
the abutter's family appeared on her behalf expressing concerns about the size of
the proposed structure, parking and intensity of use, as well as unrelated issues
concerning the exact location of the common property line with the Locus and
the stability of the rear retaining wall below the embankment; and the direct
abutters to the north spoke against the Application, in person and through
counsel about concerns related to density of use on the property and negative
impact on the traffic situation in the neighborhood. The file also contained a
letter from the Applicants in which all of the changes that had been made since
the previous two hearings were outlined. The Applicants listed the names and
addresses of several nearby abutters that were not opposed to the project,
4. There was an Affidavit in the file from the predecessor-in-title that
verified that the property contained three separate dwelling units from a time
prior to the 1972 enactment of the Zoning By-law and prior to when the
Applicants purchased the property in 1989, The Mfidavit also stated that the
structures had been in their present locations prior to 1972. The location of the
primary structure and the cottage was also verified by aerial photographs
contained in the Town records from 1938 and 1957. Such information was not
challenged at the hearing, Having reviewed this information and hearing no
contradictory evidence from any source, the Board found that the use of this
property for three dwellings was a validly grandfathered, pre-existing, non-
conforming use and proceeded with the hearing.
5. Applicants, through counsel and personal testimony, stated that
the existing improvements on the property are shown on the "Mortgage Plot
Plan" (the "plan") dated September 6,1989, prepared by Nantucket Surveyors,
Inc., a reduced a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit A. The existing
primary wood frame dwelling situated on the south side of the Locus currently
contains two dwelling units (referred to herein as the "primary structure") and is
sited as close as Ii. foot from the southerly property line. The existing ODe-story
cottage is situated in the northwesterly comer of the Locus (referred to herein as
the" cottage structure"), contains a third dwelling unit and is sited as close as 1.:!:.
2
feet from the northerly property line and 2.:!:. feet from the westerly property line,
according to the attached plan, There is also a garage situated on the north side
of the Locus that the Applicants are proposing to demolish. The total ground
cover ratio of all structures on the Locus is currently about 41 % according to the
plan, According to the plan, the Locus contains about 4,400 square feet of lot
area; with there being no recorded plan of the Locus, Applicants stated that a
review of the surrounding Union Street area indicated that lot sizes, placement of
dwellings and parking areas was comparable to the Locus, In addition, said
review showed that only two lots were conforming as to minimum lot size and
most contained ground cover rations far in excess of the maximum allowed for
subminimum lots of 30% and 50% for conforming lots in the ROH zoning
district. The property was also serviced by town water and sewer and thus there
was no other limitation on number of bedrooms on the site.
6. Applicants, through counsel and personal testimony, stated that
they purchased the property in 1989 and have lived in the primary structure
year-round since then. Applicants represented that when they bought the
property the primary structure had been used more like a lodging house with
several rooms used as bedrooms. They reduced the intensity of use in the
primary structure and maintained the existing cottage structure with little
changes. They have rented the apartment located in the primary structure as
well as the dwelling unit in the cottage structure located to the rear of the lot,
Applicants stated that they needed to undertake a substantial renovation of the
historic primary structure and needed to move out of the structure to do so, They
wished to remove the garage structure from the property and enlarge and
renovate the existing cottage structure to accommodate their family of four in
one new unit and upgrade the current one-bedroom unit in the existing
structure. The lot would continue to contain three separate dwelling units with
there being one in the primary structure and two in the cottage structure, with
the relocation of the apartment in the primary structure to the cottage structure,
with an increase in number of bedrooms from six to nine. One parking space
had historically been provided on site and the Applicants proposed to provide
two conforming spaces on the property to help mitigate the parking situation in
the neighborhood, as many other properties did not have on site parking and
parked on the street, Applicants were asking the Board to define a building
envelope and not restrict the design elements as they had not applied to the
Nantucket Historic District Commission ("HDC") for approval of the design,
Applicants explained that they had felt that going to the Zoning Board of
Appeals prior to going to the HOC would be prudent given the costs of
architectural plans should the Board alter the proposal or deny the requested
relief.
7, The Board expressed concerns related to intensity of use, density of
structures on the lot, parking, setback intrusions, massing of the proposed
cottage structure, and actual size of the lot. In response to such concerns and
suggestions of the Board and abutters expressed at the several public hearings on
3
the Application, the Applicants made several changes to their initial submission,
At the third public hearing, Applicants presented their proposal to renovate the
primary structure into a single-family dwelling with a maximum of four
bedrooms. The kitchen would be removed from the apartment space and the one
bedroom dwelling unit would be relocated to the cottage structure, maintaining
a maximum of the three dwelling units on the site, The southerly portion of the
cottage structure would be removed from the site and the remaining
nonconforming northerly portion of the cottage structure containing about 160
square feet of ground cover would be relocated to a site so as to conform to the
setback requirements. It would then be renovated and expanded in order to
accommodate maintain the existing unit and the relocated one-bedroom unit
from the primary structure. The expansion and renovation of the cottage
structure would result in above ground floors that would be dedicated to one
dwelling unit with a maximum of three bedrooms and a separate basement
dwelling unit with a maximum of one bedroom. Due to the Applicants
agreement to relocate the remaining portion of the cottage structure, the
necessity for relief to expand the cottage structure within the required setback
areas is thereby eliminated. The existing garage would be demolished with the
expanded cottage structure to be sited substantially on that site, and the
Applicants further agree not to expand the footprint of the relocated, renovated
and expanded cottage structure beyond a maximum ground cover of 880 square
feet and construct the new addition so as to have a maximum ridge height of no
more than 25 feet above mean grade, with the remaining portion of the cottage
structure to have a maximum ridge height above mean grade of 21 feet. The
cottage structure would be conforming as to setback requirements in all respects,
The Board finds that these design constraints would ensure that the structures on
the site would retain the massing relationship between the primary structure on
the Locus, and the expanded and renovated cottage structure and would be in
keeping with the neighborhood.
8, Applicants further agreed to restrict the use of the two dwelling
units in the cottage structure to year-round occupancy and agreed to the
imposition of same as a condition of the grant of special permit relief. The Board
expressed that imposing the condition as to year-round occupancy was an
important factor in their willingness to grant the requested relief, Applicants
represented that although the Locus is grandfathered for one parking space,
Applicants would provide conforming two parking spaces, in the location shown
on the Proposed Site Plan, which is Exhibit A as marked up by the Applicants, a
reduced copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit B. Applicants further agreed
to reduce the number of bedrooms contained on the lot from the originally
proposed nine to a total of eight, four in the primary structure, one in the
basement apartment and three in the other dwelling unit.
9. Based upon the foregoing, the Board finds that there would be a
benefit to the neighborhood, as the nonconformity related to the siting of the
existing cottage within the required five-foot setback areas would be eliminated;
4
two conforming parking spaces would be created on site; and to further the
maintaining of the residential character of the downtown area and supply much-
needed year-round housing, a condition would be imposed on the two dwelling
units in the cottage structure that would ensure that the units would be restricted
to year-round occupancy, In addition, based on the below conditions, the Board
also finds that the proposed changes to the primary structure, by removing the
third dwelling unit and relocating it to the relocated, renovated and expanded
cottage structure, that would then contain two dwelling units, would not be
substantially more detrimental to the neighborhood than the validly pre-existing
nonconforming uses and improvements, Further the Board finds that the
increase in ground cover to allow a cottage structure that would contain a
maximum of 880 square feet and increasing the ground cover to less than about
47% from about 41 % would not be substantially more detrimental to the
surrounding neighborhood as the area is comprised of similarly sized, if not
smaller lots, with ground cover ratios in excess of the allowable of 30% for
subminimum lots and a grant of relief would be in keeping with similar relief
granted in the neighborhood,
10. The Board of Appeals, by a UNANIMOUS vote, GRANTS the
requested relief by SPEGAL PERMIT under Nantucket Zoning By-law Section
139-33A to allow renovation of the primary structure, relocation of the apartment
unit from the primary structure to the cottage structure, and relocation and
expansion of the cottage structure on the Locus to contain two dwelling units;
and under Section 139-33E(2) to allow the increase in ground cover by an
additional 880 square feet. Relief is hereby granted based upon the following
conditions:
(a) The primary structure shall be renovated into a single-family
dwelling with not more than four bedrooms, and the kitchen unit
shall be removed from the apartment so that the primary structure
would contain one kitchen unit;
(b) The cottage structure, as relocated, renovated and expanded into a
structure containing two dwelling units, shall contain a basement
dwelling unit with not more than one bedroom and a separate
dwelling unit on the upper floors with not more than three
bedrooms and no other rooms in the upper dwelling unit shall
qualify as a "bedroom" under the requirements of the
Massachusetts State Building Code or the local Town of Nantucket
Board of Health Regulations, without further relief from this Board;
(c) The cottage structure containing two dwelling units, as relocated,
renovated and expanded, shall conform to all setback requirements
and shall not exceed 880 square feet of ground cover without
further relief from this Board, The remaining relocated about 160
square-foot portion of the original cottage would be retained and
shall have a ridge height that does not exceed 21 feet above mean
5
grade, and the addition to the cottage shall have a ridge height that
does not exceed 25 feet above mean grade, without further relief
from this Board;
(d) Two conforming parking spaces shall be provided on the Locus, in
substantially the location shown on the proposed site plan are
marked up by the Applicants, a reduced copy of which is attached
hereto as Exhibit B; and
(e) Occupancy of both dwelling units in the cottage structure is
restricted to year- round occupancy, without further relief from
this Board,
11, In the event the Applicants proceed to demolish some structures on the
Premises and renovate one building at a time, the obtaining of a building permit
under this Special Permit and the subsequent timely commencement of
demolition, construction and/ or renovation of any portion of the project
described herein shall constitute enactment of this Special Permit,
notwithstanding the issuance of . Certificate c:- n'~r any structure.
D.ted: January AQ2006 ~ ~_~) Q ~
Dale Waine
p
-'
..J
ATTEST: A TRUE COpy
~~
...,
.J!
'Jl
~_! ,'rq-r, L"-!/i::T ~''''':~~A!t'J CLERK
6
.!!
~'_.-:s-7b.v
1;.-4~
. . Ii. z~;t-,.
0'\ ',<f;j, {'ncL.
"', '
'It ~ .
J
'42,'./- /of
"'IF" RII$->~II A.fJ...,snt.,S;t1c::J'
Sk.I!>2 ~. 54 ~' . .
"-Pl&-, '8J:.7b .;; Se
~
'.~"~' .'
'll .fi' .
i ~
~ .~
N~ ~
1 ~'1,1'
i<:\~~~
, ~ "f'
~~L '}
'.' ,"":'''f'~
'. ..'''<{ 8
. "-
.1'..:.
~. ....
-,3' ~:'
'UrIC ~ <&4,,.,,,;' Pkv7 ~ 23 ,.,. Il&
~.5'5 /40;:.
GQ.';t:". .
. ;
;
'0
~
.0
ffi
<0'
N
1-
e::>
o
'.~-'
Cone. r:n-;..ta
k
.~
''-11
,01
\,
.tr) .
',,::
'"
.,:;~
.::
;
,," !
:i
"
t
!:. ~.
III !
it. .It
~. ~
~. ~,l
.t\ I\~'
'. ~ ~l:
\) >:....
:::; .j
.!}
nJ ~.
: \ ....
~.
\)<
....... .
.% .
~I
<:i ........)..,
'1lO' ~
~
--
-.4R~4:~t:S':
i
."'t
~ ~'}f z;;;:r
~
t'
.' \n
'::>-
.1
~.
~
o ~.
~:
').'.
........ .~...
.. \7"\ .
:'~"~;
.' t:: \t' ~
'~~,'I\\ "
'.I;:'t:~'~> .
.....v ~ .
.ott~t~l
~~~l.1
'~l"'"
........ ,~
.". -\.. 1:
I
'"',
~
l
\'J
. "
11 mnoll STREET
site Plan
'j/' .
. .
", ".
~......~..,
. i'" .
, o(h;~ . '. . 4z.3.Z-IC;'
. 4;: c.hOJrle-s ,.. f R."II,Ann t:'11l,.,qn
. BJt.. if? IJ 2%4-
.' All mocl.m ~ ,t:r /.CMSo. 4(1./ .
;1 f IJ . V/lI'" or/.. ..re "an- "'.~il'f
NOrE: THIS IS A'TAPE SURYE'l.
. NOr 'IO BE USED 'FOR ESl'.ABLISllIID
~ LINES; HEDGES. OR M!r{
PURPOSE onIEJ1 'l'lWt rr I 5 .
'. ORIGINAL INrEm. THIS i>LAN WAS
DRAm FOR MJR1'G<'IGE l'URl'OSES
. OOLY. oor TO BE EECOnDE:D.
", ,'I:
,..... '.
i;",; .~'_.~
',', ....
M)Rl'GAGE PJ.Dr l'U\N OF
LAND IN
NANJ,'!JC[<Er, MA'
DEED REmBENCE:,6Il1.~lr;, .17'; ~l5e'~5.!P',)
PLAN ~CE: lJo- s:;,.,...J. ..
ASSFSSOR'S SHEEr AND .
'1.JJI: NlJ1BER: 4-t.'" - M ." . . .
PREPARED FOR~ e..~....j , L.udr.\d.~I~
. '
~ i & ~.
, <'l ,
;j ll>.t.
l? ",,, ..'~.
t.. "" ..;J; n ~~-~~~
~'e;:!t '" 'C,(.:
~ -9 .,..
" .a - .
f U E. ::;:..
? ~ 6 ~ C.
3,E~:;. q:
tIE i r-~.,
SCAlE: 1"./0'
DATE':?..f'f.:~) 17~
NlINIUCKET SURVEYORS. INC.
p .a.BOX 937 _s'WlNDY'WAY
NlINIUCI<Er. MA 02554
I HImEBY CERrIFY TO THE BEST
OF .MY ~ 1HAT 'IHE
PREMISES SlmN 00 THIS PLAN
ARE oor I..CXArED W111lIN '1llE
FLOOD HAZARD ZOOE AS J)ELlNEATED.
'OO'THE ''FI!lI-t' MAP. OF cx:M-WrlY NO.
250230; MASS. EFJi'EGrIVE: 6-3-86
BY 'l1lE FEDERAL FMERGD'lct ~
. N>>lC{.
00l'E: I HEREBY c::mm:F'i THAT
THE BUIIDm; S1.nJN ON TIllS .~ .
.... PLAN IS 00 THE GROOND. AS .J
'. snao/N. ; ~ ~
.' . . / ,~ '(j
ZAn;nt9 -~;~i';l ~ ./tfsi.....k.. ~
/of,;'1..1 ~/., S~:SF 1\
.:i.(,'II' ,/rnN:7r")# - 56'
:.p..."f. :sqtkA: - ,v'...,<<.
6>del /:-r <s~~j,~ - 5' .
. c;,."""c/ c;.WI" ,a,1/,,'56 'X
. 4i:-u'f.d...a,v~~ ~ tJtIoId- '5'0:>0!>r= .30/
Ou '~~:?::T~c&o<V,d.G_4.fi ~ r
d-.:u5C'
'+<'f-.:1.1 - ,"',
"'IF R":s=>a.!I ,4, (J.orS17 't... S/tIe.:J .
SJt./~2 ~.~:'. .
''''/~ '81: ~ ," Sf'
0"\
"rt
jjVoVot:
. . II Z:5t>il:t&
. '\' Ad,
, .
",. ,
~ .
~
~
'to.' ~ .
'-'\<
~ ,~
.1. "-
~ "
N:t J
<;) . lI:
i ~~ ~>
:". 'C). ~
l(\",,\!
. ~ 'If
~ . )
."':"f '~
. "'{ ~
~ '-
~ ~
:3 ~.
- -,
~ I
~ ~u, I
lMc>u,gUj-
o~gociU,
. W-'o.:!1-,O
lIl-'N <1Il
ow",. CJ l- 0
~i5~~O~
0: Wl-I-.-J
- - - ---n.--z~-
W
&,
.' 11.4-
'L:_ ~ ~t,,.,, ,;, p~ ee. ~111t Se.
oM, ~'5 -"Co:.
ffl'"
bO.'t;;"
-.
r-----' ~
I '"
I
I
I _
I~
I
I
I
,1._, L_-1:
'I I L
I I
I I
I
I I
I I
I I
L____-1
, '$t!>'
.'. ... .
~:~ .' ~ ..'
\:'
'- 't
.. U"\
.') <;
0\
~~.~l
\ 'I:: "1\
....,,'f
'''''''~ ~
... ' '<; ~
..". U'f: 13
"'S ~. "4
. ~ t
..:r:
ol:
t
, .\(\
~
':?i,. .~,
....
~ OJ
::.t
~ ~
~.
6'..-
~
~
tl
~
.....~
~
~
to
N
. .,'. I-
c.
0
.'
k
.\J.l
\.ij.
~
.(f) ,
'0
~
I:' l)',
" ~
III .,
it' ....
~. ~ .
~ ~'l'
it' ~
~ ~ .
~ !n,
. I 0'" .
>:-. ' '
.:1" .
~
....
~
'.:::J
Qj ~ ...,
: I ""-,
;('.
<:J' ,
......
.;(
':j
^
~
.~
.:.....
:.....,.. .
':.~
".
.' '.,
l.....;t..
...1"
::~
..:....
.~
,. "
~. '. .....
(;. ",
i/" .
. ,
. v."'
. ~..r>. .:
"'h;cJf'~' , .
~ .' 41.,3,1. -Ie. '.
4,: ChOJrle!J ~'f Ru/1 Ann n,,1l8Jqt1
~ 117 IJ 1z4-
. All moc/""," ~ ~ /.CMSo 11"./
;.,? I ~ . tin;", or!. <Ire "D17' o'eScril'i
NOTE: nus IS' A' 'TAPE SlJRVE'{.
NOr TO BE USED 'FOR ESrAIlUSlIIN;
PRDPEIllY LINES, 1~, OR AA'f
PURPOSE OIlIER TIIAN IT'S .
ORICllW. INrENr. THIS Pr.J\N WAS
D1WlN FOR M:lRTGlIGE PUlU'OSES
OOLY, NOr TO BE Ilf':.CORDED.
"
H~f
, -
~ "1: l>: F:
to. [ s: fi ~i1-~.:
(is' ~ i1 'c".:"
l!-;-9 -,
!:. ~.o ( ..,-'
· li.;t ;;
~g.~ C,
3 l"I:.. tt.
. R. .. ...,.
~;~... ~ 8""
t Q' t B.t.::~~.
.);'
OOI'E: I HEREIlY CElU.'llY THAT
TIlE BunnING S1la1N ON TIllS ~ .
I'UIN IS ON TIlE GROOND !IS .J
S1~~. ~ ~
. / 'j 'f;)
Z<>n;nt; - ~;'&'?f~/ C4f/ /tsr'_k' ~
AI';' [.1 .:1;., Seve;SF 1\
?(,...., r~r"':!c - 5d'
I,..."r' :u(k:K.. N'.",~
S)c:I~ / r"fMr C1"~;'lH:/:- _ ~'
c;rou.,a' c;_ ..:u1'f~' .54";/. .
..GI':-,..../..c,wr ~':. ~ <Kleier 5=0 s,: .'!-~ f
-~..,.t_c:Tro..vtrl. ~ ./.;f,:;7. r
j ~:
F.1le '0(. , e
. ....
11 UNION STREET
Site P1a~.
MJRTGAGE FUJr PIm OF
.' UNO IN
lWl1Ua<ET, MA'
DEED REFERENCE:~ :t~' 'r;,.I7!i~~~:~?:.~:tl,,'. '.:"'" .
PLIIN~: I-Jorw,. s::;-..J... .. "
ASSESSOR 'S SHFZJ: AND " .
'1JJJ: Ntl1BER: .(4.' ,/ - 4A ..., .
PIlEPARED:FOR:. J?,W;....{ , L.~nd,,~6<TI~
SCAIE:.'".'O'
DA'1E: '~rr,:{.) '7~
NANllJa(ET SUR.VEYORS, me.
P.O..BOX: 937 -5 'WINDY 'WAY
NANnJa<ET, MA 02554
I l\E11jmY cmrnY TO '!HE BEST
OF .M'll<NCNlUXGE mAT nm
PREMISES SH~ ON 'lltIS PLIIN
ARE NJ'r I.OC.A1'F1> WInlIN 'I1lE
FlCOD HAZARD ZONE JoS DEL.l1<EAIED.
00''I1lE ''Fm1' I MAP. OF a:M1IJNTI'Y NO.
250230; MASS. EFFECTIVE: 6-3-86 .
DY'l1tE FEOOP.AL ~CY ~
AGfll(;{. . .
. tl-.245C-
....
...
. .~'.
"'':.
........
TOWN OF NANTUCKET
BOARD OF APPEALS
NANTUCKET, MASSACHUSETTS 02554
Date:
J C";[WG"'! 0<0, 20CJ(P
To: Parties in Interest and, Others concerned with the
-Decision' aT the BOARD OF APPEALS in the Application of the
following:
Application No.: (j&<g' - 05
Owner/Applicant: ~c)~ert- b, (rn.rlf1l "(hv., dVld
Loc ~'nJ2o. ~. G-arrl '.$'o f)
Enclosed is the Decision of the BOARD OF APPEALS which has
this day been filed in the office of the Nantucket Town
Clerk.
An Appeal from this Decision may be taken pursuant to
Section 17 of Chapter 40A, Massachusetts General Laws.
Any action appealing the Decision must be brought by
filing an complaint in court within TWENTY (20) days after
this day's date. Notice of the action with a copy of the
com.laint and certified copy of the necision must be given
to the Town Clerk so as to be received within such TWENTY
(20) days.
,
i
\
\i
'., \
\i
.uJ
-~..-
Chairman
cc: Town Clerk
Planning Board
Building Commissioner
"
PLEASE NOTE: MOST SPECIAL PERMITS AND VARIANCES HAVE A TIME
LIMIT AND WILL EXPIRE IF NOT ACTED UPON ACCORDING-TO NANTUCKET
ZONING BY-LAW ~139-30I (SPECIAL PERMITS); fi139-321 (VARIANCES)
ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE CALL THE NANTUCKET ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS,
NANTUCKET ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
1 East Chestnut Street
Nantucket, Massachusetts 02554
11 Union Street, Nantucket
Assessor's Map 42.3.1, Parcel 44
Residential-Old Historic
Deed Book 333, Page 129
No plan on record
DECISION:
1. At public hearings of the Nantucket Zoning Board of Appeals,
opened on Friday, October 14, 2005, continued to November 18,2005 for further
discussion, and concluded on January 6, 2006, at 1:00 P.M., in the Conference
Room in the Town Annex Building, 37 Washington Street, Nantucket,
Massachusetts, the Nantucket Zoning Board of Appeals made the following
Decision on the Application (068-05) of ROBERT D. GARRISON AND
LUCINDA B. GARRISON, of 11 Union Street, Nantucket, MA 02554, in
connection with property known as 11 Union Street, Nantucket, Massachusetts.
2. Applicants are seeking relief by SPECIAL PERMIT under
Nantucket Zoning By-law Section 139-33A (alteration/ expansion of pre-
existing/nonconforming use/structure), Applicants proposed to alter the
nonconforming use of the property, three dwelling units on one lot, by
renovating the existing duplex structure in the main building by relocating one
unit to the existing cottage and converting that structure into a duplex, thus
maintaining three dwelling units, An existing garage structure would be
demolished to provide room to expand the cottage, The height of the cottage
would increase within the required five-foot setback areas but would come no
closer to the lot lines than the existing structure. The new addition, constituting
the increase in ground cover, would be conforming as to setbacks. As part of the
project the main structure would also be renovated. Applicants are also seeking
relief by SPECIAL PERMIT under Nantucket Zoning By-law Section 139-33E(2).
As part of the renovation and expansion of the cottage, Applicants are asking to
increase the ground cover from about 41 % to no more than 50%, which is
allowed by a grant of special permit relief for sub minimum lots in the ROH
zoning district. One parking space is currently provided on site. Applicants
propose to add a second parking space if possible. The lot is nonconforming as
to lot size, with the lot containing about 4,400 square feet of area in a district that
requires a minimum lot size of 5,000 square feet; as to ground cover with the lot
containing about 41 % ground cover ratio in a district that allows a maximum
ground cover for undersized lots of 30%; as to setback, with the main house
being sited as close as about one foot from the southerly side yard lot line, and
the cottage being sited as close as about one foot from the westerly rear yard lot
line and about two feet from the northerly side yard lot line, in a district that
requires a minimum side and rear yard setback of five feet; as to parking with
the lot having one parking space where there are three required; as to use, with
there being three dwelling units on the property, rather than a maximum of two
as allowed in this district.
The Premises are located at 11 UNION STREET, Assessor's Map 42.3.1,
Parcel 44, no plan on record, Deed Book 333, Page 129. The property is zoned
Residential-Old Historic.
3. Our Decision is based upon the Application and accompanying
materials, affidavits, representations and testimony received at our public
hearings. The Planning Board made a negative recommendation, Over the
several hearings, an email was received from an abutter immediately to the west
in opposition to the height and massing of the originally proposed new cottage;
two letters were submitted from the direct abutter to the south and members of
the abutter's family appeared on her behalf expressing concerns about the size of
the proposed structure, parking and intensity of use, as well as unrelated issues
concerning the exact location of the common property line with the Locus and
the stability of the rear retaining wall below the embankment; and the direct
abutters to the north spoke against the Application, in person and through
counsel about concerns related to density of use on the property and negative
impact on the traffic situation in the neighborhood. The file also contained a
letter from the Applicants in which all of the changes that had been made since
the previous two hearings were outlined. The Applicants listed the names and
addresses of several nearby abutters that were not opposed to the project,
4. There was an Affidavit in the file from the predecessor-in-title that
verified that the property contained three separate dwelling units from a time
prior to the 1972 enactment of the Zoning By-law and prior to when the
Applicants purchased the property in 1989. The Affidavit also stated that the
structures had been in their present locations prior to 1972, The location of the
primary structure and the cottage was also verified by aerial photographs
contained in the Town records from 1938 and 1957. Such information was not
challenged at the hearing. Having reviewed this information and hearing no
contradictory evidence from any source, the Board found that the use of this
property for three dwellings was a validly grandfathered, pre-existing, non-
conforming use and proceeded with the hearing.
5. Applicants, through counsel and personal testimony, stated that
the existing improvements on the property are shown on the "Mortgage Plot
Plan" (the "plan") dated September 6, 1989, prepared by Nantucket Surveyors,
Inc., a reduced a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit A. The existing
primary wood frame dwelling situated on the south side of the Locus currently
contains two dwelling units (referred to herein as the "primary structure") and is
sited as close as 1.:t foot from the southerly property line. The existing one-story
cottage is situated in the northwesterly comer of the Locus (referred to herein as
the" cottage structure"), contains a third dwelling unit and is sited as close as 1.:t
2
feet from the northerly property line and 22:. feet from the westerly property line,
according to the attached plan, There is also a garage situated on the north side
of the Locus that the Applicants are proposing to demolish, The total ground
cover ratio of all structures on the Locus is currently about 41 % according to the
plan. According to the plan, the Locus contains about 4,400 square feet of lot
area; with there being no recorded plan of the Locus. Applicants stated that a
review of the surrounding Union Street area indicated that lot sizes, placement of
dwellings and parking areas was comparable to the Locus. In addition, said
review showed that only two lots were conforming as to minimum lot size and
most contained ground cover rations far in excess of the maximum allowed for
subminimum lots of 30% and 50% for conforming lots in the ROH zoning
district. The property was also serviced by town water and sewer and thus there
was no other limitation on number of bedrooms on the site.
6. Applicants, through counsel and personal testimony, stated that
they purchased the property in 1989 and have lived in the primary structure
year-round since then, Applicants represented that when they bought the
property the primary structure had been used more like a lodging house with
several rooms used as bedrooms. They reduced the intensity of use in the
primary structure and maintained the existing cottage structure with little
changes, They have rented the apartment located in the primary structure as
well as the dwelling unit in the cottage structure located to the rear of the lot.
Applicants stated that they needed to undertake a substantial renovation of the
historic primary structure and needed to move out of the structure to do so. They
wished to remove the garage structure from the property and enlarge and
renovate the existing cottage structure to accommodate their family of four in
one new unit and upgrade the current one-bedroom unit in the existing
structure. The lot would continue to contain three separate dwelling units with
there being one in the primary structure and two in the cottage structure, with
the relocation of the apartment in the primary structure to the cottage structure,
with an increase in number of bedrooms from six to nine, One parking space
had historically been provided on site and the Applicants proposed to provide
two conforming spaces on the property to help mitigate the parking situation in
the neighborhood, as many other properties did not have on site parking and
parked on the street, Applicants were asking the Board to define a building
envelope and not restrict the design elements as they had not applied to the
Nantucket Historic District Commission ("HDC") for approval of the design.
Applicants explained that they had felt that going to the Zoning Board of
Appeals prior to going to the HOC would be prudent given the costs of
architectural plans should the Board alter the proposal or deny the requested
relief.
7. The Board expressed concerns related to intensity of use, density of
structures on the lot, parking, setback intrusions, massing of the proposed
cottage structure, and actual size of the lot. In response to such concerns and
suggestions of the Board and abutters expressed at the several public hearings on
3
the Application, the Applicants made several changes to their initial submission.
At the third public hearing, Applicants presented their proposal to renovate the
primary structure into a single-family dwelling with a maximum of four
bedrooms. The kitchen would be removed from the apartment space and the one
bedroom dwelling unit would be relocated to the cottage structure, maintaining
a maximum of the three dwelling units on the site. The southerly portion of the
cottage structure would be removed from the site and the remaining
nonconforming northerly portion of the cottage structure containing about 160
square feet of ground cover would be relocated to a site so as to conform to the
setback requirements. It would then be renovated and expanded in order to
accommodate maintain the existing unit and the relocated one-bedroom unit
from the primary structure. The expansion and renovation of the cottage
structure would result in above ground floors that would be dedicated to one
dwelling unit with a maximum of three bedrooms and a separate basement
dwelling unit with a maximum of one bedroom. Due to the Applicants
agreement to relocate the remaining portion of the cottage structure, the
necessity for relief to expand the cottage structure within the required setback
areas is thereby eliminated. The existing garage would be demolished with the
expanded cottage structure to be sited substantially on that site, and the
Applicants further agree not to expand the footprint of the relocated, renovated
and expanded cottage structure beyond a maximum ground cover of 880 square
feet and construct the new addition so as to have a maximum ridge height of no
more than 25 feet above mean grade, with the remaining portion of the cottage
structure to have a maximum ridge height above mean grade of 21 feet. The
cottage structure would be conforming as to setback requirements in all respects.
The Board finds that these design constraints would ensure that the structures on
the site would retain the massing relationship between the primary structure on
the Locus, and the expanded and renovated cottage structure and would be in
keeping with the neighborhood.
8. Applicants further agreed to restrict the use of the two dwelling
units in the cottage structure to year-round occupancy and agreed to the
imposition of same as a condition of the grant of special permit relief. The Board
expressed that imposing the condition as to year-round occupancy was an
important factor in their willingness to grant the requested relief. Applicants
represented that although the Locus is grandfathered for one parking space,
Applicants would provide conforming two parking spaces, in the location shown
on the Proposed Site Plan, which is Exhibit A as marked up by the Applicants, a
reduced copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit B. Applicants further agreed
to reduce the number of bedrooms contained on the lot from the originally
two conforming parking spaces would be created on site; and to further the
maintaining of the residential character of the downtown area and supply much-
needed year-round housing, a condition would be imposed on the two dwelling
units in the cottage structure that would ensure that the units would be restricted
to year-round occupancy, In addition, based on the below conditions, the Board
also finds that the proposed changes to the primary structure, by removing the
third dwelling unit and relocating it to the relocated, renovated and expanded
cottage structure, that would then contain two dwelling units, would not be
substantially more detrimental to the neighborhood than the validly pre-existing
nonconforming uses and improvements. Further the Board finds that the
increase in ground cover to allow a cottage structure that would contain a
maximum of 880 square feet and increasing the ground cover to less than about
47% from about 41 % would not be substantially more detrimental to the
surrounding neighborhood as the area is comprised of similarly sized, if not
smaller lots, with ground cover ratios in excess of the allowable of 30% for
subminimum lots and a grant of relief would be in keeping with similar relief
granted in the neighborhood.
10. The Board of Appeals, by a UNANIMOUS vote, GRANTS the
requested relief by SPECIAL PERMIT under Nantucket Zoning By-law Section
139-33A to allow renovation of the primary structure, relocation of the apartment
unit from the primary structure to the cottage structure, and relocation and
expansion of the cottage structure on the Locus to contain two dwelling units;
and under Section 139-33E(2) to allow the increase in ground cover by an
additional 880 square feet. Relief is hereby granted based upon the following
conditions:
(a) The primary structure shall be renovated into a single-family
dwelling with not more than four bedrooms, and the kitchen unit
shall be removed from the apartment so that the primary structure
would contain one kitchen unit;
(b) The cottage structure, as relocated, renovated and expanded into a
structure containing two dwelling units, shall contain a basement
dwelling unit with not more than one bedroom and a separate
dwelling unit on the upper floors with not more than three
bedrooms and no other rooms in the upper dwelling unit shall
qualify as a "bedroom" under the requirements of the
Massachusetts State Building Code or the local Town of Nantucket
Board of Health Regulations, without further relief from this Board;
(c) The cottage structure containing two dwelling units, as relocated,
renovated and expanded, shall conform to all setback requirements
and shall not exceed 880 square feet of ground cover without
further relief from this Board. The remaining relocated about 160
square-foot portion of the original cottage would be retained and
shall have a ridge height that does not exceed 21 feet above mean
5
grade, and the addition to the cottage shall have a ridge height that
does not exceed 25 feet above mean grade, without further relief
from this Board;
(d) Two conforming parking spaces shall be provided on the Locus, in
substantially the location shown on the proposed site plan are
marked up by the Applicants, a reduced copy of which is attached
hereto as Exhibit B; and
(e) Occupancy of both dwelling units in the cottage structure is
restricted to year- round occupancy, without further relief from
this Board.
11. In the event the Applicants proceed to demolish some structures on the
Premises and renovate one building at a time, the obtaining of a building permit
under this Special Permit and the subsequent timely commencement of
demolition, construction and/ or renovation of any portion of the project
described herein shall constitute enactment of this Special Permit,
notwithstanding the issuance of a Certificatetf ~ ~y structure.
Dated: January AQ2006 _ . ~~k~
Dale Waine
6
.~ cn
m
tJ ill
<.0
N
I--
C)
0
k
,~
~
\,
tr)
M:)RTGAGE PLOr PLAN OF
UNO IN
NANIUCI.<Irr, MA'
DEED REFERENm:B1l Z'71 ';.17<; ~ ~~ ~?'9 ,."
PLAN REFERENm: ~o~ l"'"..,n,J,
ASSESSOR'S SHEEr AND
r.ar NU1BER: 4-2.',/ - 44 ' ,
PREPARED FOR: e.~.....j Ij. L.uc.ind1l6........;"""'1
SCAlE: I'~ 10'
DATE: -';;"f'f.~) IJa<)
NANIUCI.<Irr SURVEYORS. me.
P.O. BOX 937 -5 WINDY 'WAY
NANIUGKET. MA 02554
I HEREBY CEltL'J}Y TO 'lllE BEST
Of ,MY l(NCMU:LGE 1lIAT THE
PREMISES SHOON 00 1lIIS PLAN
ARE NJr LOCATED WI11lIN TIlE
FLOOD HAZARD ZOOE AS DELINEATED
ON 'TIlE ''FIRM' MAP. OF aMIllNrlY NO.
250230; MASS. EFmCrIVE: 6-3-86
BY TIlE FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGE2-lENl'
AGENCY ,
~ II)
Ii '&:'
~ '1\
~ ~
I\l ~ ,~
~ 1\
~1~1
~~~)
':1'~
~ "-
::!: 'l..
:3 ~
42.~.1 - fef
/-.IIF .,!;?l/~~g.!I A.;'Jd>..r7 L..s;tlc.:J
Sk. 152 ~. 54" .
, P!.sn ' BK.no '~Sf'
~..;::r7'1
o.v~-4~
{/ <: ~ity.
0'\ · ,~,;! , f'ncL.
0'\'
'1/ ~~, '
'\-.
-..
/-;"g J-" ",4....n ,n Plan Be. 23 t;. 6&
M.55 -"Ce.
GO,' :t'~
""',...~
G>n~, Dr;va
~/,+",
J ~I
g ~
"t 'Q
'l!
It..
",>-
='"
~
-
-i:
{
,'\(\
- .L'rRG4 ,: 44-cO ts::
~ ~'.-f 'Zh9
~l
~
'- ~
~ l!:'
"- \)
,tj ~
"~~,~l
~~,'"
~.,,~~
t-41:"'~
"l'U~ ~
'~~.~
," t
"'{ .:r
. ~r'IGJ";t
1'1-1'.,l/:: ,4z.3.Z-/~
4p c.h;vle~ G. f 1<"'./1, Am' ;:'/"n8J;;n
~ 1/7 If 224-
All mOdg...,., ~ ~r /.CMSo S(1,f
"'''' f I!> . L/"'/6n orl. 4r... ""''7- cleSGr'ipf
NOrE: 1lIIS IS A TAPE stJm7EY,
NOT TO BE USED ,fOR ESrABLISHING
PROPEro.Y LINES. ltEDGES, OR Nif{
PURPOSE 0lliER THAN IT'S
ORIGINAL INIEN1'. TIllS Pr..AN WAS
DRAWN FOR M:)R1'G!IGe PUlU'OSES
ONLY, NOT TO BE RECORDED.
NOrE: I HEREBY cmum TIIAT
TIlE BUIlDING SllOON ON nus ~
PLAN IS ON TI-IE GROUND fl.') ,.)
Sllao/N. , /~ ~ ~
ZAn;NJ - ~;.!mt~1 cPA:/' /;fst.....k .s
11';' L. f ":/:21 sa::o:SF 1\
U,'n.,c:-,..""t."c - 56'
,r"1'W'l1 :5,,1kA:. - ,.; 'Vle
Sid. I /"Itdr <$",~j,04:- - 5' ,
c;r"""c:i c;,v;rr' ,t:Q1/,.. 56 ';/.
.4:r;sU'ld...GvlV!-'; ""~ ""c:i-:;;o:>o -sF .36i/.
_w."l,_C.,rO<.Vlcl G..c.- 4.f,;7.:t-
, /::et:, ICl'/I}e
j ~ :. 0"
~ (j ~ L
~ ~ ": E-
,. !i !:l:,;
~R!1"
'4 ~ ;'" ~ ~~!.
~!iJ [ ::
;>~oRC:
;! E~ :;.
ii-Ii
....;_'n.;.,
~"', :'
~
~
.
IJ
~
'0
~
I
~
Il.l ~
~, ~
~ ~.~
1 ~~
~ ~n
() , '
t
u
~
~
Q ~
i
;(
\)'.
........
%
11 UNION STREET
Site Plan
tJ - 245C-
~< ~"B
/I <: ""itlo
C1'\ . ",W . Ad, D
,,;;.
~ ~. .
r
j
.';
b'
.~ ~ '0
ri ill
<.0 D ~
N
1,-
c>
Q
."
k
.'-U
01
\,
.tr) . ..~
. .
! . ~'"
Q) ~
~. .ll
~. .~ .t
tlJ ij ...
~ ~.!
1 ~ .:::
~ S~ .
() ~ .'
~ >:-....
.... -:1
.~ 0
llJ ~.
I
;( , .
()".. '.
......
.~
42."./- fef
1-// F 1?i/~~rz.!I A. ~:;J"'dl7 L. sltle:;
Bk. 1~2 ~,54: .
. PI,." . BJ: ~ ." Sf'
MJRTGAGE PIJJr PLAN OF
IMID m
NANllJa<ET, MA'
DEED REFERENCEiBI!1<';' r,.17';~S~~?~:I::7'
PLAN REFERENCE: lJo~ ;:;"'".1.
ASSESSOR'S SHEEr AND .
wr NUMBER: ,f.t.',1 - 4.4 . . .
PIlEPARIID FOR:. e..bvor-! ~ L.~r:1dtl6&rr';~
SCAlE:. '".'0'
DATE:..;;...f'/.') '7W'J
NANlUCKET SURVEYORS, me.
P,O. BOX 937 -5'WINDY'WAY
NANl'UCI<E'l', MA 02554
I HEREBY CElmFY 'IO THE BEST
OF .M'i I<NCMLErGE mAT THE
PREMISES SHa-JN CN nrr.s PLAN
ARE NO! LOCATED Wl1HIN THE
FLOOD HAZARD ZOOE AS DELINEATED
OOM ''Fml1' MAP. OF cx:IffJNrl'Y NO.
250230; MASS. EFFECl'IVE: 6-3-86
BY 1HE FEDERAL fIolERGENCY MANAGE2oIEN1'
. AGENCY.
./k.
,- (1.4
~."
bo;t;"
~ t(\
~ ~ lk'
I()
-~ ~
- ~
~ N:t J
I:> I\:
i~'-l1
.... ~ '()
~'-'~ \'l
~4. )
:-l~
J "-
'L
... --.1
?
,;"*- ~ rr:4",,,,,,;' PI= Be ~J I? 8e.
,M,1<;;.<iCc.
;------'1 '"
I
I
I ,
I ~
I
I
,
L_, L--1:
'I I L
I I
I I
I
1 I
I I
I I
L____-1
- --1
r: I
3: . L1- I
UJ ti: ci . "
ZCld"'~t;:
O~",OCl .
~::J~~<i~
~~""~b:il
003:i=>-'"
_ _ _ ___g:__~!Q_....l
)(
w
3<9'
'- "'t
.. I['
"- <:>
!I 0\
~~.~l
I 't 01:\
..... " ':!-
""" ~ .....
~ \; '<; ~
~ U'h d
~~"'(\
\" t
"( .J
..c
:f
'1fI
~
~ ~I
....
~ IlJ
~i
^ Gt
i.
6'".
~ ~ G ~.
~ ~ ~ L;.
€ ~. 5;;; ..;,~.
~'5' ~ "\ L.,.::
..... i! ':;" g D;'Y;'
~ t~ I g
3. Ii ~ ~
~;" .... ~
. :l ==
jfnl.5
F.f'.;;
NOTE: I HEl\lIDY am'nY llIAT
TIlE BUnmNG S1IONN ON TIITS ~\
PLAN IS ON TIm GROUND liS -'
S1lo:m, -:. ~
/ 'j "0
z,n;n<J - ...~;.Iu,i~1 au' /,f.5'f_k ~
011';" LoI ..:/:.. Sax:>:5F 1\
M,'". rn-nf-,c - 56'
F,...,,! ~rlk:.I,: - "';""'<f.
s;c/../ ~<1r~"~ _~'
C;r"""c;/ c;...... .-Qrj:' 56";/.
,6rou"d'..CDvIV' ~,; ~(,. ....,~5=O 5{: ~o/
_0<.t....I"c}77x.V1r:! G.a- 4'.1,;?::r-
lOt- I e
-;\-..
rl
~
....)$
r.-t-
'~
'N
....><
~
11 UNION STREET
Site Plan
tJ -:U5C.
6-89
Form
NANTUCKET ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
TOWN AND COUNTY BUILDING
NANTUCKET,MA 02554
File NO.~-()~
Assessor's Parcel
THIS AGREEMENT TO EXTEND THE TIME LIMIT FOR THE BOARD OF
APPEALS TO 'MAKE A DECISION (or to hold a public hearing or
take othe.r act~n) ~~erns the Application of:
~Jn G Y\ ~ l,.:.QlI4 Go yY'1 Y'O (J
Pursuant to the provisions of the Acts of 1987, Chapter
498, amending the State zoning Act, Chapter 40A of the
Massachusetts General LaWs, Applicant(s)/petitioner(s) and
the Board of Appeals' 'hereby agree to extend the time limit
_ for a public hearing ~on the Applicatron, or '
fo'r a d~cision ~ of the ,Board, or
for any other action
'by the Board,
(whether such Appl!cation,is an appeal from the
decisi?n of an~'a~i~istrativeoff~cial~ petition for
'a SpecIal Perna t, or _for a Var1.ance , or for 'any
extension mod1. f1.cat ion or: renewal ther~of)
, -" ' -' -
"~
to the NEW TIME LIMIT of midnight on F.Q.1Drrn~ VJ Co
but not earlier than a time limit set by statut~ or bylaw.
The ~pplicant(s), or the attorney _ or a~ent _ for.-
Appl1.cant(s) represented to be duly author1.zed to act 1.~
th~s,~atter ~or Ap~licant(s), in executi~9 this Agre~ment
wa1ves any r1.ghtsunder the Nantucket zon1.ng Bylaw and the
state Zoning Act, as amended, tot&e extent, but only to
,xtent inconsistent with this Agreement.
Effec~JJ!-L~!:: Agreement
cc: Town Clerk
Planning Board
Building Commissioner
Agreement filed in the office of the Town Clerk:
, Il" '6'"L(O r-
Date ~ Town Clerk
TOWN OF NANTUCKET
ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
1 EAST CHESTNUT STREET
NANTUCKET, MASSACHUSETTS 02554
PHONE 508-228-7215
FAX 508-228-7205
NOTICE
A Public Hearing of the NANTUCKET WNING BOARD OF APPEALS will
be held at 1:00 P.M., FRIDAY, OCTOBER 14, 2005, IN THE CONFERENCE
ROOM, TOWN ANNEX BUILDING, 37 Washington Street, Nantucket,
Massachusetts, on the Application of the following:
ROBERT D. GARRISON AND LUCINDA B. GARRISON
BOARD OF APPEALS FILE NO. 068-05:
Applicants are seeking relief by SPECIAL PERMIT under Nantucket Zoning By-
law Section 139-33A (alteration/expansion of pre-existing/nonconforming use/structure),
Applicants propose to alter the nonconforming use of the property, three dwelling units
on one lot, by renovating the existing duplex structure in the main building by relocating
one unit to the existing cottage and converting that structure into a duplex, thus
maintaining the three dwelling units, An existing garage structure would be demolished
to provide room to expand the cottage. The height of the cottage would be increased
within the required five-foot setback areas but would come no closer to the lot lines than
the existing structure, The new addition, constituting the increase in ground cover, would
be conforming as to setbacks. As part of the project the main structure would also be
renovated. Applicants are also seeking relief by SPECIAL PERMIT under Nantucket
Zoning By-law Section 139-33E(2). As part of the renovation and expansion of the
cottage, Applicants are asking to increase the ground cover from about 41 % to no more
than 50%, which is allowed by a grant of special permit relief for subminimum lots in the
ROH zoning district. One parking space is currently provided on site, Applicants propose
to add a second parking space if possible. The lot is nonconforming as to lot size, with
the lot containing about 4,400 square feet of area in a district that requires a minimum lot
size of 5,000 square feet; as to ground cover with the lot containing about 41% ground
cover ratio in a district that allows a maximum ground cover for undersized lots of 30%;
as to setback, with the main house being sited as close as about one foot from the
southerly side yard lot line, and the cottage being sited as close as about one foot from the
westerly rear yard lot line and about two feet from the northerly side yard lot line, in a
district that requires a minimum side and rear yard setback of five feet; as to parking with
the lot having one parking space where there are required; and as to use, with there being
three dwelling units on the property, rather than a maximum of two as allowed in this
district.
The Premises is located at 11 UNION STREET, Assessor's Map 42.3,1, Parcel
44, no plan on record, Deed Ref. Plan Boo 333, Page 129'rThKfroperty is zoned
Residential-Old-Historic. ~
Dale Waine, Chairman
THIS NOTICE IS AVAILABLE IN LARGE PRINT OR OTHER
ALTERNATIVE FORMATS. PLEASE CALL 508-228-7215 FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION.
~
NANTUCKET ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
1 EAST CHESTNUT STREET
NANTUCKET, MA 02554
CASE NO. ~~
FEE: $300.00
APPLICATION FOR RELIEF
Owner's name(s): Robert D. Garrison and Lucinda B, Garrison
Mailing address: 11 Union Street, Nantucket, Massachusetts 02554
Applicant's name(s): same
Mailing address: same
Locus address:
11 Union Street
Assessor's Map 42.3.1, Parcel 44
Land Court Plan/Plan Book & Page: Deed Book 333, Page 129 Lot: deed only
Date lot acquired: 10/16/1989 Deed Ref: Deed Book 333, Page 129 Zoning District: ROH
Uses on Lot - Commercial: None~ Yes (describe)
Residential: Number of dwellings~ Duplex-L- Apartments_Rental Rooms_
Building Date(s): All pre-date 7/72? Yes C ofO(s)? n/a
Building Permit No: 7315-90 interior renovation; 13413-96 insulation; 242-03 repair fire dama2e
Previous Zoning Board Application Nos.: none
State below or on a separate addendum specific relief sought (Special Permit, V ariance, App~l), Section of
the Zoning By-law, and supporting details, grounds for grant of relief, listing any existing no~onformities:
r ',~
r..)
See Attached
-" -j
,
,
,
';'1
I certify that the information contained herein is substantially complete and true to the best of my
knowledge, under the pains and penalties of perjury.
Robert D, Garrison nd Lucinda B. Garrison, by their attorney Emily Avery
SIGNATURE: Applicant Attorney/Agent X
(If not owner or ow rney, ase enclose proof of agency to bring this matter before the Board)
FOR z;II, FFIC SE F ______
Application received on::])!?t 0 rn; {}J # omplete: ~ Need copies?: ,
Filed with Town Clerk:-=:r~jO~3RBin.g Boartl:=:::?~.)-J- Building Dept.:_/_~~ cJ
Fee deposited with Town Treasnrer::lJ ~c:;; - ~ aiver req~ested?: Granted: --! _1_
Hearing notice posted with Town Clerk: tV iJ ~ailed:5t./bl cJ~M:!lj22tcr& )4 (a~
Hearing(s) held on:_/_/_ Opened on:_/_/_ Continued to:_/~_ Withdrawn?:_/_/_
DECISION DUE BY:_/_/_ Made:_/_/_ Filed wffown Clerk:_/_/_
Mailed: / /
---
DECISION APPEALED?:_/_/_ SUPERIOR COURT:
LAND COURT
Form 4/03/03
ADDENDUM TO APPLICATION
Applicants are seeking a Special Permit under Nantucket Zoning By-Law
Section 139-33 (alteration/ expansion of pre-existing non-conforming
structures/ uses).
Applicants' property is a pre-existing, nonconforming lot in the ROH
District, having approximately 4,400 square feet of area where a minimum of 5,000
square feet is required. The property is conforming as to frontage, having
approximately 82 feet of frontage where a minimum of 50 feet is required.
There are three structures on the property; a duplex, cottage, and garage.
All structures are conforming as to front yard setback, being located as close as 5
feet from Union Street where there is no front yard setback requirement. The
duplex is pre-existing, nonconforming as to side yard setback, being located
approximately 1 foot from the southerly side yard setback. The cottage is pre-
existing, nonconforming as to side and rear yard setbacks, being located as close
as 1 foot from the rear yard setback and as close as 2 feet from the northerly side
yard setback. The structures are pre-existing, nonconforming as to ground cover,
having a total of approximately 41 % ground cover where 30% is the maximum
ground cover for lots with area less than 5,000 square feet. The structures on the
property are pre-existing, nonconforming as to use, with three dwellings on the lot
begun before 1972.
Applicants propose to renovate the duplex to a single-family residence,
demolish the garage, and renovate and expand the cottage to a duplex, thereby
retaining three dwelling units on the property. Applicants seek Special Permit
relief under Section 139-33(A)(5) to increase the height of the cottage in the rear
and side yard setback (the addition to the cottage will otherwise comply with
minimum setback requirements) and to renovate the main dwelling located within
1 foot of the southerly property line, and Section 139-33_ and (E)(2) to
increase the ground cover ratio to no more than 50% which is the maximum
allowed for conforming lots in the ROH zoning district.
Although the property is pre-existing nonconforming as to parking, having
one parking space, Applicants propose to add a second parking space so as to
provide two ~ parking spaces on the property.
The property is located at 11 Union Street, Tax Assessor's Map 42.3.1,
Parcel 44. The property is zoned Residential Old Historic.
f
A~
.,9,.'
---
--
11 UNION STREET
Locus Map
&'
,
1o~'
\.
10'
· <E,
lb'
\'lJ
o'/.
14
,#
3:r.: ?~
BOO~ '--1 J PAGE >_ l,l
AFFIDAVIT
WE, MARILYN I.GAROFALO and GAETANO GAROFALO of
Boca Raton, Florida on oath depose and say:
1. We are familiar with the property known and
numbered as 11 Union Street, Nantucket, MA.
2. The buildings and structures that are now on the
property were so located from before 1972 and have been
in the same location, to date.
3. There are three (3) dwelling units at II Union
Street which have been in existence prior to 1972 and
in continuous use to date.
WITNESS our hands and seals this 230
day of Octo~er, 1989.
STATE OF FLORIDA
County of
4.; In Sc-i)
,ss
October 4 1989
Then personally appeared the above-named MARILYN I.
GAROFALO and acknowledged the foregoing instrument to be her
free act and deed, before me.
/~~
Notary Public
HANfu6K€T c6UNTV
Rttctoived and Entered
NOV 0 9 198~_~ jfil!t:~
Attest )t!P- Register
My Conunission expires: ^
NOTARY PUBLIC ST~TE ~~ ~~c~~~;
~. / ~ / // /~,7~-:-- I / ,/
O " ,',' / / .~
' -' / .' / ' "
/ // //X<>/" "// /./;':>,. /</>/ /'
// //'i// /' // / ./ // / / .'./ / / /
/ ?X/ /. ///'i./ ~/ />/ /0/ //..>/ ~
// // ./ /// ///..'~' //,/ ,/ ,/,., /' , / ./ ~
.//~/~///~//. //'~/ /"'/~;<<<'/ //)%.", "//./ ~
, / \. /';;;; "/~/ " / /~,.-' /./ (' ~
.// /,'/ / '/f'(/ ,",' ,/"'/ ///~/ "
~/~/ / / ,...\-oJ/ ,.,.' /~/ / /~,. '0
~' //'~;",>~/ // > '~~' ,.'/~>><~j}/;'<%~,>:~; ') ~;J'""'\
/ / //>/ //, ~'~/,/~ // ////>/ / /' ~t '~
%/ ~ /,/ , ./.... .It//,'///j~4</< ','J.
~//.//' ~/ ~<;/ /~ ;</ " " ~
I~ /' '/~/>., // / I//~&'''//:'//<'--:'< /<//~
... / / / . /~/' /...-. ~ ,.-' ./ .... ~
s'ka~ / /'/0 /' ,//'/'/', /////. i
"" ~ / / / ,/ /... / ,/ ' // /: ."
':-/e/q/ ~t~.. w..!/. // ,/ // /~~,/ .. <. '></j' / /. \
t / / / / /, /" ",,' ... .' ,/ .' / ~t IS ~
._- 5'4':t:
yO o. ..' '\
. "0 "'i
)( ~~'~~6~';';-:!O~~ ~ri-~ .r, ~~
t~__~.o~ 0 0 00 u ~i~
~-' c:-or1 G. ...p...
. ..~ / J/ / ..' J
. . vrlO' / / .
..,h'~ ,4z,3.Z -Ie,;
f.J/~ c..niJr/e-:s G'f Ruff, Ann t:/iilflSJ:Jn
~ 117 fJ 22'"
, All mod~t-n ~ /lr ,l.GMSo 8f1d
t <1 If, /$ U/1/4n .rf. 4re n017 ~ cleseript
Nom: THIS IS A TAPE SURVEY.
. Nor TO BE USED ,FOR ESTABLISHING
PRDPEltlY LINES. HEDGES, OR JtN{
PURPOSE .anIER THAN IT'S .
. ORIGINAL INrENr. THIS Pr...AN WAS
DRAWN FOR MJRTGAGE PURPOSES
ONLY, Nor TO BE RECORDED.
. ~ (\.
'l ,~
.~ "-
~ "-
N ~ .~
~. ~
i .8"''\....., .
~.~ ~'~
.~~..~.~.
. 4: '{.
~ ~
, e
';~'t<~
, -q: ~
"-
J ~
:3' .J,
I .'
.~.
0"\
....
~:'
0'\
'.\t\ ~ ~ t
"'l~.~~
~.'t.. 'f.
.." '"
'l'(\':..~ ....
~ ( "'"'. 3
"'-t-U~ t3
'~ ~"'\\
~ t.
..(1... .
'-
~
'"
.. ij
<#
!~
42.~.1 -Iof
/-.II F l;!1.I:S:>a.// A. rf;JcfJc:lnL. s/t/e.::J
Sk, 1~2 19. 54." "
P/.an '8~ ~ 'l7.Be
-. '3"7"OtV &- -4
~r;;;'y
II ~ 6r;K~ ,/
q,; {hcl..
'" '
(/'\'
t-J'
v.~
r
1
,'1
Ii
(J"\
'1t
/.;ne;;]~ ~4,,'rn I;' P/<3J1 Be. 23 " Be.
4.6,5'5 kCC.
." ...
ffl(;f' bQ.~ t:
l[)
Q')
ill
<..0
N
\..--
r -J
;=j
'0
w".c ~c.""
~
.\'/
~
ftI
i,.I
'llQ
~
~ '
Con~ . Onva
~
k
."li
~.
0.t
\",
V),
..('
~.
'\{\
~
';;
.... '
~
~
" ~
-l-,
~
~.
lU
~
It.
"1...)...
~
'::1
-(t
I ' ~.
I .
l!) ~
...J \l
en .~
"
....'
~ .\j
~ ~,)
.t' ~
-- "
?! :) ~ .
; () ~ '
... \) ~
~ .....
1- -...J
\) .~
OJ 0
~, ,
, I ,
I
~. ~. .
\J""
""-.
,~
'-ARG4 :.44oo1:.5{:
J
g
~
.--
..~'t'If Ih9
v)~
~~
.'+ '"
1-- 0 - --')0
11 UNION STREET
Site Plan
. .
~ ~~ ~i ~...
~ ~~. ~~ ~;
'", $., ~."
~,;,.~,~;' .~
-, e, ''t ",
a..~, ~
,,"'. ~ ;h ~ f.l~:)~\
~ 1':. ~ ~r;..
" ;0:1 ;s ~ /ill,"'"
""' ~ tlm!"
"J J g. 'a ~'l" ~""'.';
~. 5. ~ ~~_~ t_l!f
~. ~\ ~i
~:t,~," '""'~ '1"4-
;,,, .., t::
:to S. ~ ;j
~.Cl.{~
MJRrGAGE PLCJr PLAN OF
LAND m
NANIUQ<ET MA'
,
DEED REFERENCE:Bll 2.t; I r~, .17~ ~ J3~.:~'5',~ : I::J'. '.'~ .n';,
PLAN REFERENCE: !-lone F~r1J,. -
ASSESSOR'S SHEET AND
wr NUMBER.: 4-t.~.1 - M
PREPARED FOR: e:,~....J ~ LUGir1dt36.srr;~
.
SCAlE: I" ,,/0
DATK:~f=.Pr.--~) 17w:)
NANTUCKET SURVEYORS, INC.
P.O. BOX 937 -5'WINDY'WAY
NANrUCKET, MA 02554
NOTE: I HEREBY CERl'IFY THAT
TIIE BUILDING Sna.1N ON THIS ~.J
PLAN IS ON 'TIiE GROUND AS
... SHCX~. . /~ j ~
ZAn;nt/ - ..(.~;~i,;/ c;,t/ /O$1'c?r,.'c' ~
A(,;,t.1 .:s:UI .;$ct:lO 'SF 1\
,M,'". ~l"OI7rv"c. 56'
,.r-r.nr :rql~ . N.....,~
.Side I ~ t:51C~/.fIC/;:.. - 5' .
c;rot.N)c:/ a.vo:r ~f/~' '64 /!
"6r.tJu~cLCOvfU'~';. ~~ vncler 5c:oo SF 3o.;t
_~~.t,~,.C.,r(>(jndGIlftV'4.f.;;: :r
P.& .1r::J~
I HElmBY CEKrIFY TO THE BEST
OF MY' KNcw..EI:GE 11IAT THE
PREMISES SH<H1N ON THIS PLAN
ARE NOT :r.oc.ATED WITHIN THE
FLOOD HAZARD ZONE AS DELINEATED
'ON'THE "FIm-t' MAP, OF CCM1lJNlTY NO.
250230; MASS. EFFEctIVE: 6-3-86"
BY THE FEDERAL El1ERGENCY MANAGEMENT
AGENCY .
,J -.245G.
~."""':~:'.'":~ =.~~
'\
":.'
. ."1
"
. ',.1
, ,
.,
.
.'j
'.
.... i
!
", 'j
"
..1":
,
;\',. .
" .
. \":'
"
"j
.:',";
,...;1
,.
, :.
..~. ,; .'h;..h oM
. ,
IJ /3,dO
Town of Nantucket
RECEIVED
BOARD OF ASSE~SORS
JUL 0 5 2005
. TOWN OF
NANTUCKET, MA
ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
LIST OF PARTIES IN INTEREST IN THE MATTER OF THE PETITION OF
PROPERTY OWNER..~~,. .~. ...tALC< J:J.PA... ,~.~~,,J
MAIUNG ADDRESS....... .IL ..u..J.!.\ .O.N....~........................
PROPERTY LOCATION.... .le.. .l.J.JJ.\Q.N.,... .~......................
ASSESSORS MAP/PARCEL......-4.~.~. ~.L.I... oJ-.... .4.4:.........................
A P P LI C A NT. . . ..Sl\M .e. .. . .. . . . C4 0. .. .. 'f. 4I:t.~ .tK.- . f:,J.JY?. . Avef!.-Y U1'
-, I ~ (2-00$
SEE ATTACHED PAGES
I certi fy that the foregoing is a list of persons who are owners of abutting property, owners of
land directly opposite on any public or private street.or way; and abutters of the abutters and all
other land owners within 300 feet of the property line of owner's property, all as they appear on
the most recent applicable tax list (M.G.L. c. 40A, Section 11 Zoning Code Chapter 139.
Section 139-29D (2)
Jt:7II,H2~~'[
/J.. Il#
,-r:~........J
ASSESSOR'S OFFICE
Town of Nantucket
t!l
Z
~~
Ul
H .
..:IE-<
IZl
Ull>4
ll::U
IZlP
E~
IllZ
~
8
...
., f< f< f< f< f< f<
I'lS mD1tr.ltntnOJE-tE-tE-tE-ti-lE-t
u V1t1!O'JtIlD1O!
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~5 E E E
~ oooooo~~8888
I'lS r-I CJ\ to- Ln \Q Cll) r"l ...
!:l4 Nr-lMM....'I""IM1""I
f< f< f< 'f< f< f< f< f< f< f<
tn D1 E-t ~ E-t ~ E-t D1 OJ OJ m m E-t E-t m m m
m m m V1 en m m
~ m ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ m ~ =
~ a ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ t t t ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
o 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 8 8 8 0 0 ~ ~ 0 0
I
CJ\ ~ Cll) ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
... '"
o ...
... 0
"? '-:
~ Cll) 0 CJ\ W 0 ~ ~ Cll) Cll) M . M
N 0 ~ 0 0 CJ\ Ln Ln ~ ~ M Ln ...
Pi O'll'Or-lOCOlllU'll""'l"'o\D\I')O
.... OE""I""'I'" r--\DN Nt'l"Ir"lNNO\
N '"'NNO'Ir--OOOOOf'l"lO....
Cll) M r"l 0 0\ 0 \D t'l"I ~ M M 0 ... ... " to-
g ~ : s ~ : ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ : ~ ; ~ ~
o CJ\ \D M .... "'"' tot 0 N M N \D NOr-- 0
r-I MOM 0 '1""1 0 '1""1 0 N N 0 0 tot 0 N
t; ~~ilfJtlt~~!l!!l!;;:~~~O':t;;:~~:'n;~!i~t~il~g
~
><
5 I
o
~ CJ
o j ~
'" H CJ
:il to ~
~ B .. ~
~ 8 ~ I
~
f< f< f< j f<
~ ~ 8 ~ 8
I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~
=
~ ~ ~ Cl
e ~ j ~ ~
~ ~ re = ~
o H 0 E-t rn ~ ~
~ ~ i ~ i ! a ! B j
a ~ a ~ a I ~ ~ ~ I
Cl =
t; ~
~ ~
!it tl
~ a
..
..
"
"
~
~
...
...
i
~
..
f
H
..
o
N
N
~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ >< H '" ~ f<
~ ~ ~ H ~ M ><
... ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ !it ~ a f< f< t a ~
o = ~ 0 !it >< 0 ~ ~ ~ s
= ~ : ~ ~ E ~ ~ = mas "' ~ ~ ~ ~ tl
N ~ N ~ ... ~ Cl ~ ; ~ ~ ~ ~ ! ~ t i ~ S
M ~ M ~ M ~ g"'"' ~... ~ ~ ~ ~ 8 8 '" ~
I:Q t:) PI I:Q co f-4 0 ~ 0
r-- 0 0 u 0 M r-I OJ 0 Cll) r-l 0 t"-
an 0 ... 0 0 III Cll) ... CJ\ CJ\ t'l"I to- 0 M ~ CJ\
... ~ M ~ ~ ~ ~ Cll) CJ\ .... "'"' Cll) r-- CJ\ .... N M M \D r-I
~ ~
~ ~ t; a ~
,dl ~ ~:il III
f ~ E B ~ S
i ;:~=~iGi
~ ~~~E~
.c .-t............ r-I
J
f<
~
'"
~
H
r:l
~
~
H
~ f<
M ~
a ~
= ~
~ a
B ~
H 0
= N
~ ~
'tJ2
2
H
'"
~
"
'"
M
S
III
"
><
~
..
~
:0: :0:
~ ~
~ 5
~ ~
~ ~ B i
~ ~ i ~
........ ....
CJ CJ 'I
..
,
"
Il
~
"
to
o
U
'"
!
i
o
....
CJ
~
~
:0: CJ ~
i ~~~; ~ a I~ f<
~ ~ M e g ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~ : "' ~ ~
~ H g ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ CJ ~ ~ ~f< ~ ~ ~
~ "0 ~ ~ ~ ~ f< H CJ" ~
g ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ f< ~ ~ H a ~ E ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ A H > ~ H ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ w
""H =~~~~HH~"'", ~ Clrli~Qlil
! dH~;H~H~!;~~~~~t: ~~~"g~~=
Z -~~ 101 a _..:rea~j8!jglf<~~
j ~~~lj~~i~~mIE;I~I~~i~1
.,
...
II
...
o
o
...
...
~
~
N
o
...
..
l
~ ~ ~
~ ::1 ~
"' ~ 0 8
0:> U IIQ C
'4) Ul f-t p:;
M ~ ~ ~
~... 0
o III 0
o U') 0 r--
Po. "" 1"'4 C"t
CJ
~
M
~
~
~
o
tl
~
f< ~
~ :
~ =
!it ~
!il '"
pS~
~
M
a
=
i
"'
~
~
e i
,,~ = ~
~ 0
~ ~ =
I:! Ii ~ ~ ~ ~ "
~ ~ ~ H f< ~ 8
III ~ H tl Cl ~ !>
~ ~ a t ~ : ~
M 2 t: ~ a e ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ii! III a
Iii .., iil ~ ~ !il ~
"'
~
4J ...Itt\Or--VlIttO
3 ~ ~ ~ ~ = ~ ~ ~ = ~ ~ ; : ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
N N N M N N N N N M N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N
_It ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~::~~::::::~:::
x ............ . . . · . · · - · · ... · · · · · · · · · ·
N
Q)
01
III
00
---
~
N
M
It)
It)
o
...
o
o
N
.....
\D
.....
...
CJ
Z
~~
tIl
H .
,~ Eo!
tile!
P:t.l
~~
Ill:;!;
~
. ,
I< t; I< I<
tIl tIl tIl
III l!i III III
o I< 0 0
I< I< a I< I< I< I<
tIl ~ ~ tIl ~ tIl t; t; ~
~ = ~ ~ a = l!i l!i III =
~ a ~ a ~ a ~ ~ i ~
0\ r-- 1"- 1ft P:l
1ft M ~ M .... 1ft M ~ ~ 0\ N
t; t; !il i
I I i a
o
o I"i 0 N
.... co r-I rI co rI
t ~ t
I< I<
R tIl tIl
o
j i i
~ a a
I<
.. ........
.. '" '"
III l!i
~ !; t; I< ~
! ~ l!i ~ ~
a a ~ ~ I<
0< tIl
., .... ....
I<
U) E-t fo4 1-1
fo4 E-t tQ U1 VI E-t
tD tI1 M u.I
~l!i~III~
8 ~ 0: 0 0 0 ~
o .. .. N '"
,.., rot M M M 1""1
I< I< I<
U) en fJl E-t
tIl
I I I ~
\D 1ft 0\ ....
....
o
...
'i'
~ .. .. ~ .... \D 1ft 1ft N N .. .. .. m N ~ .... .. N ~ .. .. ... .. ~ 0 .. . .... N ...
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ e a i a ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ; ~ ~ ~ E 5
N 0 0 0 N 0 0 ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 N N .... 0 0 0 ~ 0 0 0 0 0 MOO 0 ... 0
III
01
t()ttt E-t ~
U1 U) U1 ~ U1 E-t E-t t E-t ~ tD
! I I ! ! ; i i Iii I
~ M ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ : N ~ ~ ~
I< I<
tIl tIl
l!i l!i
~ ~
'D
o
'"
'"
,
... .. 1ft ... .. ~ \D .. .. .. M .. ... ... ..
1ft 1ft M 1ft ~ N N ~ 1ft 1ft 0 1ft 1ft 1ft 1ft
1ft 1ft 0 1ft 1ft l"- 1"- 1ft 1ft ~ .... 1ft 1ft 1ft ~
N N 1ft N N \D \D N N N co N N N N
001"- 0 0 N N 0 0 0 MOO 0 0
t; ;! ;! ;!
g t ;! 8 ;! ;! ;! ;! ;! ;!
~ ;! ;! ;! .::
;! ;! ;! ;! ;!
~ ;! ;! ;! ~ ;! ;! ;! ~
v v
r:l r:l
III
I< I< .. ~ is
BBB~i
~ ~~~~~
~ ~
~ ~
~ ~
tIl tIl
r: =
~
I I ; I i I i I I I I I ; I I I I I
~ ~ ~
o ... 0
III r:l III
HI
'"
..
..
"
I<
'tl
'.i!
8'
..
....
..
..
:II
lil
...
...
...
=
~
o
0:
....
'"
'"
..
~ ~
tIl
a : ~
~ ~ tIl
.... Ltt .... 0 ~ E-I 1ft
'" '" '" f:'l ~ 'D
: :::O~8::1
Q) 000 Iw::o a III
k Pl~",\D
'tl .... 0
'tS 0 0 0 r-- .......
..c Pi P4 P. N t.I l"- Pi
lil
~ ~ ~ ~
o 0 .. ..
P' P:l U1 U1
~
~ g i
Ii! v g
:j ~ t; ~
I e ~ :
... '"
~ ~ ~ ~
.. lil
'" tIl
t; ~ .
~ ; ~
~ III 0
o
.. '"
r:l
...
~ ~ ~
0: 0:
r:l r:l
~
.. '" '" '" !
VI NON
rt"I Ch ... 0\
~""""!
~ : CQ CQ al 4"l
0000'"
M III P. Pi Pi M r---
i i ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ;
~ ::! !l
iQ IQ \D \D 00
.... ....
.... .... 'D
'" '" ....
tIl
0:
~ l'J l'J ;l;
~ a a ~
Ul U1 00 H
o In! g
....
N III 1ft 0 ... ...
rI N N I1t N N
'"
.,
tIl
0:
..
~
!il
l!i
..
I
~
!!l
tIl
o
,
<,l
..
..
.. tIl
tIl 0
!l Ii!"
13 .. 0
III .. ~
! ~ ~
~ ~:
~ E-4 ~
o ... ~
v III ..
..
8 ~
ii
~ ~
o III
,...
V tIl
..
tIl
~
i
.. ..
.. 00
.. ..
r:l r:l
tIl tIl
.. ..
a a ~B
.. ..
o 0
0: 0:
.. ..
o 0
"..
v v 0
.. Ill"
~ ~ S
r:l i 8
~ 0< ~ ..
r:l ......
r:l 0: '::i
~S~i
~ Q U o.M
E
~
.... ....
B B ~ B B
i ~ ~ i I
....
..
l; c:
... ...
~ H
o
.... ..
o
... 0
'" ..
~ ~
.. ..
re : ~
tIl 0 H
~ ~ g
o 0
'" ..
;! ;! ~ ~ ~ ;! ;! ..:
;! ;! ;! ;!
!:l :I
a ~
B B B ~ B 8 8 B
~ I ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~
t
'"
! ;
o
.... ..
tl
~ :j ..
0< : g
p. 0 t) CD
~~~ES
: '" ~ g 2
U'I'" 0 0
M '"' '"' Pi Pi
..
tIl
~
l::
0; ..
tIl
::l Ii!
!< ..
i ~
~ ~
i 0:
tIl ~
..
..
::l
..
tIl
..
!:'l
~ ~ ~
o III III
....
000
'" 00 ..
co 0\ 0\ IlI1
... '" '" ~
'" .... ....
H
o 0
III
o '"
.. '"
..
~
::l l::
a :
v ..
g !<
~ tl
o
~ S
a ~
tIl l:l
~ f;!
V tIl
... 0:
~.. !:l
: ~ a :
2 0; ~ ~
l!i '" .. ::!
~ B ~ g
~ ~ ~ :
Iii!
~
N
M
.. ..
.. 0<
: ~~ a i ~ ~~ ae
... ~ ~~ ... !!l :O:..tIl ItIl re~ L1~~
..., vv ..~~.. ~~..
... tIl l!i'" tIl ~ tIl 0: ~..:
; ~ ; ~ ~ ~ i E i ~ ~ ; ; ~ ~ ~ ! i i tIl : ~ ~ ~ ~ i ~ s ~; g ~ ;.. i i ~ ~
i ~ ~ ~ III = ;! a I" .. ~ g ~ ~ III III ~ 8 a H I ~ l'J ~ ~ ... :I i ~ ~ ~ a = v ~ i ~ s ~ 5 ::! ~ ...
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ E m B B ~ : i ~ ~ ~ i ~ ~ 0: : ~ ~ ; i ! ~ ~ i ~ ~ ; : 5 ~ : ~ ! ; ~ ; ;
j i i i i i I ~ .. i i 5 i Iii ~ a i I i Ii; s ~ ! ~ ~ !il ~ ~ ~ i ~ ~ i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a
~ ~
8~ ~
a 1"'1 N ... "
~ .
.... OOrolNff)...anNNM...\Dr-.COo\O....lttl"-tDCDCOcococnOM...r-CO 0
S ~~;~~:=!;:O:~::~::~:::~:::~~::::=:=:!::!::!:;!;=~~:=~=~=====~~~~~CD ~
....
'"
tIl
..
V
...
~
.. .,
tIl ....
....
I ;
~ .. ~
... 100: ..
l'J 8 !!l
0:
.. III ~
~ ~ III ..
:j ~ e ~
:z; lilt t:Q IlI1
... ..
~ 0 0 0
,,0;
V V ..
....
rt N M ... III
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ '"' '"' '"' '"' '"' rt '"' N
i ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~r:~~~~~~~~~~~~~~::r:~~5SS55S6S ~
....
---
..
tIl
iJl
iJl
o
....
?'!31'Z - r'
'3'11 '01' -:1-il"?
7' x: 1'7 ~ f>v"'U9'l"'I>~:r
:is OQ:;>..G -;alA> ?7-''I AD",,??,",noJ-!;T
;L. rG ";'.'/~ ~ pc""",:?
,oS - -:pa'h~~9 ~ f "/"(.9
~"'" />' - ;:y::Ff~> f---.;f
,9S - ::>k.I-<t<M..;7' '''.'W
..:is: QCl:>S; ..,.,. -1"7 (J'fy
j!7$J/ /W rl'lAf>[~ - 6u~u~
, 'NfoUlS
fN ~ 3lU m SI NV1I
SIIl1 m NfoYJlIS ~crnna 3H.1
.L\IH.1 MI.nIID lJIIDI3H I : 3.I.CN
'ffiIffiIW"m :;III OJ. Jrn . J."lNO
S'.!lSOdllild ~rn 11M NMVlla
SIJl1 NVId SIHL . IN:IDU '1\INl::lTIlO
, S. J.I NVHJ. lliIIUD aSOdlli1d
J..NV 110 . s:;rnml . S'.!lNTI ;mrndcmd
~avJS:;I 11M Cl3SIl :;III. OJ. Jrn
'}3lillilS &lVJ. V SI SIHL : 3.I.CN
f"l..nsap -I.tcv :>-'t> 'If iJPfvf7 'i I 1 b,;
/"'fl '),lpi' -'(/ o/'~ V4J?Of..lJ lIP'
;/.Q~
.~
~ Xl~ 'I\flI:3.CIlli: 3H.1 xu
98-(-9 :3L\I~ 'SSVW ~oaO!;l:
'ON XLINfll-HD .ill 'dVW l,wmd" 3H.1 NO
G:Wf.3NI'UKI sv 3NOZ ffiIVZVH (]()()'J.i
3H.1 NIH.I.Il1 aaur.xn .TOO 3.mt
NV1I SIHJ. NO NfoYJllS S'.!lSIWiIUd
:!I1-!.L J.VHJ. ~ m .!IO
JS:;IlI 3H.1 OJ. MI.nIID XlIIDillH I
i]!;!;l:O vw . J.IDDfUN\IN
XVM., XCINIM.. s- LE6 XOII '0' d
'~1I . sao1S/ill!lS .I.IDDm.N\IN
~tl ( .,' .w...";7 :atVa
.OI~..1 ::;nvJS
nRta a~lS pasodo~d
~aa~~s nOlnn n
~
--....
CJ
2:
1
~ 'tJ
~
~ ~
~.L () ()
'l:.~ ~'
~~ 1
~'~\ ~
~ ~
~,
" ~
.l1 \l;
~
t;)l
~
CJ)
'\
IV
flI
111
\
'-""':"~~ ep\-lpn1 ~ ,.-':7<l"3:11M ffiffiVdIDld,
_ VI' - ,"'Z'Y :l1:;IUWflN J.Cf1
GNV J.3mlS S;llOSs:;rSSV
',...~ 'AJON :3:)NmIaDU NIfId
(,(..1- €ls.<;i';lf/ ~ ~LI .6; I ~~ il~ ::DNIDillil3a a:;ma
,VW i J.IDJ:)fUN\IN
NI CJN\/'l
.ITO N\I"LI JGICI :oJ:JVmliCR
Q,
~
/;\
,
.
, ,~
-
'"
?;:-
"""(;:..
~
N--
~
n-
1\
, .~~! h
'.,.'1} , " , \,{) '"
~:t!J'i' l, '
477",.. ~ .
:5'^,o~ _
ez; ~ r;:z' ';IS . LfPjd,
. ; n'2<- Z~I ',"'If!
r:~/71.s'7 uS'",,!,f.'P' //?J=,net .:1/1'1
JOJ -/'V?:P
t'
;t }
P--r\":!-..
~ fl
~ :1-...(\ '"
c :>. ~ ~
\. ~"'~
'1\.1\.....
Ilo~ \
~~t&
~ 6
(0 ;-
~ "
L' ~'
:- f
tt:
(t>o..:t1f>
l,\ ">,O'"\ll
\~3:'
\I ~
f ~N
~ ~
~ t
i) .t