HomeMy WebLinkAbout025-05
TOWN OF NANTUCKET
BOARD OF APPEALS
NANTUCKET, MASSACHUSETTS 02554
~~
Date:
1J6>r"f (
/2-
, 2 00.5"
\
To: Parties in Interest and Others concerned with the
Decision of .the BOARD OF APPEALS in the Application of the
following:
Owner/Applicant:
();( S~O S~
Oau/lrLI), {hif)T-ei{a
.
Application No.:
. .
,
,
"
Enclosed is th~ Decision of the BOARD OF APPEALS which has
this day been filed in the office of the Nantucket Town
Clerk.
An Appeal from this Decision may be taken pursu,a.nt to
Section 17 of Chapter 40A, Massachusetts General Laws.
Any action appealing the Decision must be brought by
filing an complaint in court within TWENTY (20) days after
this day's date. Notice of the action with a copy of the
complaint and certified copy of the Decision must be given
to the Town Clerk so as to be received within such TWENTY
(20) days.
~&.l ~C-< ~ (~\ Jf7710 '-
n ~Y..::t . r(l(lS) Cha irman
cc: Town Clerk
Planning Board
Building Commissloner
PLEASE NOTE: MOST SPECIAL PERMITS AND VARIANCES HAVE A TIME
LIMIT AND WILL EXPIRE IF NOT ACTED UPON ACCORDING-TO NANTUCKET
ZONING BY-LAW ~139-30I (SPECIAL PERMITS); ~139-32I (VARIANCES)
ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE CALL THE NANTUCKET ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS.
NANTUCKET ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
1 East Chestnut Street
Nantucket, Massachusetts 02554
Assessor's Map 60.1.2, Parcel 5
12 Tennessee Avenue
Residential-2
Land Court Plan 3092-S
Lot 2
Certificate of Title No. 15,790
DECISION:
1. At a public hearing of the Nantucket Zoning Board of
Appeals, on Friday, March 11, 2005, at 1:00 P.M., in the
Conference Room, in the Town Annex Building, 37 Washington
Street, Nantucket, Massachusetts, the Board made the following
decision on the application of DAVID V. CANTELLA, c/o Reade,
GUllicksen, Hanley & Gifford, LLP, Post Office Box 2669,
Nantucket, Massachusetts 02584, File No. 025-05:
2. The Applicant is seeking a MODIFICATION of SPECIAL
PERMIT relief granted under Nantucket Zoning By-law 5139-33.A
(alteration/expansion of a pre-existing, nonconforming structure)
in the Decision in Board of Appeals File No. 023-99. That
Decision allowed the expansion of the Applicant's pre-existing,
nonconforming single-family dwelling, by constructing a new
entryway on the southerly front of the house within the required
30-foot front yard setback area without coming any closer to that
lot line than the structure. The Applicant constructed that
addition pursuant to a validly-issued building permit. However,
the addition constructed was larger than the addition originally
approved by the Board of Appeals, although it came no closer to
the front lot line than was permitted. The Applicant is seeking
validation of the addition as constructed. A Certificate of
Occupancy was issued in 2000 for the addition. In addition, the
Applicant is seeking new SPECIAL PERMIT relief under By-law 5139-
33.A (alteration/expansion of a pre-existing, nonconforming
structure) to enlarge an existing addition on the northeasterly
side of the house, which is situated as close as about 1.8 feet
from the northeasterly side lot line, with the minimum side yard
setback allowed in this zoning district being ten feet, by
constructing an addition which would also enclose an exterior
access to the crawl space. The new addition would extend
vertically about two feet in height (for a maximum height in the
addition of about ten feet), extend horizontally about seven feet
in a southwesterly direction and about one foot in width, and be
sited within the side and front yard setback areas but not come
closer to the side or front lot lines than the structure as it
now exists. The new addition would continue to contain the
existing boiler and provide interior access to the crawl space.
The Locus would continue to comply with the maximum permitted
ground cover ratio of 12.5%. The Locus is nonconforming as to
1
lot size, having an area of about 12,682 square feet, with the
minimum required in this zoning district being 20,000 square
feet; as to front yard setback, with the structure being sited as
close as about 23.2 feet from the front lot line, with minimum
front yard setback in this district being 30 feet; and as to side
yard setback, with the structure being sited with zero setback
from the northeasterly side lot line, with the minimum required
in this zoning district being ten feet. The Premises is situated
at 12 TENNESSEE AVENUE, Assessor's Map 60.1.2, ParcelS, is shown
upon Land Court Plan 3092-S as Lot 2, and is situated in a
Residential-2 zoning district.
3. Our decision is based upon the application and
accompanying materials, and representations and testimony
received at our public hearing. There was no Planning Board
recommendation, on the basis that no matter of planning concern
was presented. Except for the presentation by the Applicant and
his legal representative, there was no support or opposition
presented at the public hearing and no letters on file.
4. As presented by the Applicant and his counsel, this
application was brought in order to correct a serious problem
with the boiler in the existing dwelling, which was inadequately
protected from winter weather conditions and had suffered
freezing damage in cold weather. In order to adequately insulate
and protect the boiler, Applicant represented that it was
necessary to expand the shed addition (which may include
demolishing the existing shed to construct a new larger shed) in
which it was currently housed. Applicant also proposed to enclose
the existing crawl space access area in the new shed addition to
permit interior access to this area and curtail freezing of the
structure. This addition was sited wi thin both the front and
northeasterly side yard setback areas. The expanded new shed
would not be sited any closer than the existing house to the
front or side yard lot lines. The shed would also include an
upward expansion within the setback area. Applicant stated that
the shed would be located in an area of the lot that immediately
abutted an unconstructed way that had little likelihood of being
opened given the proximity of the house and road to the wetlands
and Hither Creek, and there was substantial natural vegetation in
that area.
5. Applicant represented that in addition, upon review of
the site plan for the Locus, by Blackwell & Associates, Inc.,
dated August 4, 2000, a reduced copy of which is attached hereto
as Exhibit A, it was determined that the front entryway addition
constructed pursuant to the relief granted in the Decision in BOA
File No. 023-99 was larger and in a different configuration than
what was shown upon the plan submitted therein, although it came
no closer to the front yard lot line than the existing house, as
required by the Board at the time. Therefore, the Applicant was
seeking a modification to said relief to validate the addition as
built, which had already received a Certificate of Occupancy. The
2
"""..--."- --..---, ..,.... ".-..--. ...~._~ ...-...---- ----- -- - --- --- .-."..-- ------ -------.
site plan in 1999, was a site plan that was submitted with the
first application for special permit relief in 1994 when the
Applicant had received permission to expand the front entryway
and which the Applicant never exercised prior to the expiration
of the permit. When the Applicant made application in 1999 for
the same purpose, the Decision stated that relief was based upon
the plan and information contained in the 1994 file. The addition
shown in both 1994 and 1999 was actually sited further into the
front yard setback area and when application was made to the
Building Department a new plan had been done showing the addition
spread out more and not in the front yard setback area. However,
said corrected site plan was never submitted to the Board. There
was no issue of any violation of ground cover requirements.
6. Therefore, based upon the facts as presented, the Board
of Appeals, by UNANIMOUS vote, makes the finding that the
proposed addition would be an intensification of the
nonconformity in that the shed would be expanded both vertically
and horizontally within the front and side yard setback areas.
However, the Board also finds that said expansion of the shed
would not be substantially more detrimental to the neighborhood
than the existing nonconformity. In addition, the Board also
finds that the addition completed in 2000 would not be
substantially more detrimental to the neighborhood than the pre-
existing, nonconforming location of the existing dwelling.
Neither the new shed nor the front entry way as constructed would
be closer to the lot lines than portions of the pre-existing
nonconforming dwelling. Accordingly, by UNANIMOUS vote, the Board
of Appeals votes to GRANT the requested relief by SPECIAL PERMIT
under Nantucket Zoning By-law 5139-33.A to expand the shed as
proposed and by MODIFICATION of the SPECIAL PERMIT issued in BOA
File No. 023-99 to validate the front entryway, subj ect to the
following conditions:
a. The addition shall be constructed in substantial
conformity to the plans submitted to the
Nantucket Historic District Commission and
approved under Certificate of Appropriateness
No.45,497, as may be amended from time to time;
and
b. The front entryway shall be substantially as
shown on Exhibit A, which plan refers solely to
the existing footprint of the structure and is
not indicative of the new shed to be constructed.
3
(ZBA Decision 025-05)
Dated: April ,~ 2005
p U~ G, \; '~Va&M-
Nanpy-. yr ps ~
/
\
c.
, ,...;
4
#
IONING tl~SSlflCAllnN: 1(- Z EXISTING:
MIN. AREA: . ZoC?OO. SX. . . . :~~~~~SF
MIN. FRONTAGE: . . .75, . FT.. . . 5F:~ . PL;A;N
FRONT YARD S.B.: ' ' :3~.~, . , . ',' , , , :1,
REAR & SIDE 5:8.:, ~q ,F.T:. , "f.
GROUND COVER (7.): . . 12; ':! "!-. . , .c:qi. ~.
//
~'?- _c.,!:.. /
rl-;.'\f>/
/'
GO. /.2 -4
l<.IfF
P.1v(. REIS TRUCKING-, INe.
LOT 1 L.C 30~Z-6
FlOOD 7.oIJE '8
f"Lfi:5D'Zo~
wATER 5tJ'PfLY
EASE MEI--IT
DOC. 01<35058
Blackwell At Associate! Inc.
v
~f+
ONLY ORIGiNAllY STAMPED AND
ENDORSED COPIES OF THIS plJiN
SHALL BE ACKNOWLEDGED BY
THE CERTlFtlNG LAND SURVEYOR.
Go.l.2. - 3
N/r
BROAD CREEK R. T.
LDT A L,C 3092-8
'"
..l
'1
..;:
ffo
~
<J
"
- - " ~
f-
tj
~
tn
8
o
(J'
CROSS
5T.
-FlOOD 7ol-/E;; A5
. -. FLOOD--=z.O~8-'--
,tl
00
'1:
1 .sTORY
DwELLING
(IJ
: I I I :
-; ~- ~ -{ - ~-:-
~+I: ,,-tJ; .. I I.. 1..( . ,tl;:r
OJI ~l ~l lIT? I{T)' ,- N:.1
~: I'i': ~I :~ :<'i.'~l(j:1
N: : I :~...J:i' ~1
7:500 ,,!.LJw':'
.: .> " ",'
!'C2&" :
/.0;0:/
TENNESSEE:
;---
INOT TO BE RECORDEP]
UNOYv'ERED
CRAWL 5PACE
ACCE5'3
!~
I
---(
LJ
TO: .-rYE. . . t?O.5!~lJ. .~/'(~. <;:~f-!-r:S. .SA'!!t-.!G:~
. .BM~.)F~.'!3:........ AND NO OTHERS.
I CERTIFY, TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE, THAT THE
PREMISES SHOWN ARE LOCATED IN FLOOD HAZARD ZONE:
Ap) ~J. C; . . DEUNEATED ON F.I.R.M. / COMMUNI1Y PANEL
NUMBER: 250230-00 . .I~ . . .0, BY THE FEDERAl
EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY. EFFECTIVE DATE OF
MAPS: JUNE 3, 1986 AND AS PERIODICALLY REVISED.
THIS INSPECTION PlAN WAS PREPARED FOR MORTGAGE PURPOSES
ONLY AND IS N01 TO BE CONSIDERED A FULL INSTRUMENT SURVEY.
THIS PLAN SHOULD NOT BE USED TO F5TABUSH PROPERlY UNES.
FENCES, HEDGES OR ANY ANCILlARY STRUCTURES ON THE PREt.llSES.
THE PROPERTY LINES SHOWN RELY ON CURRENT DEEDS AND PlANS
OF RECORD.
THIS INSPECTION PLAN IS NOT A CERTIFlCA110N AS TO THE TITlE OR
OWNERSHIP OF THE PROPERlY SHOWN. OWNERS OF ADJOINING PROPERTIES
ARE SHOWN ACCORDING TO CURRENT TOWN OF NANTUCKET ASSESSOR
RECORDS.
THIS plJiN SHALL NOT BE USED FOR ANY OTHER PURPOSE OTHER 1lWl
ITS INTENDED USE STATED ABOVE.
AVE.
Owner:
\Mil@~lf@&@[g
~~~~~~liil@~ ~[b&[M
Bllil
~~@~~D ~@~
SCALE: r = 2':5 DATE: APRIL 30, 19'73
1?E,VISED: AUGA, 2000
. P.4,Y,IJ) ,(~.t:-"!-r:E.L0. . . . . . . . , . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . L~T 2' . . . .
DeedjCert.: .cgT; .'?n9 Pion: V~ :?09't-: :;3. . .
Tax Map: ~..'.?~ .5. Locus:-J.2.T:E!-i!-l~i=A~',
FBK.:
BLACmLL ct ASSOCIATES, Inc.
i"ro!esrio'nGL Land SUT1J81IOTS
6 Young's fey
Na:n,tucket, ~tts 02554
131; -7Z (6. .-9826 B- 38~
\'
TOWN OF NANTUCKET
ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
1 EAST CHESTNUT STREET
NANTUCKET, MASSACHUSETTS 02554
PHONE 508-228-7215
FAX 508-228-7205
NOTICE
A Public Hearing ofthe NANTUCKET ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS will
be held at 1:00 P.M., FRIDAY, MARCH 11,2005, IN THE CONFERENCE ROOM,
TOWN ANNEX BUILDING, 37 Washington Street, Nantucket, Massachusetts, on the
Application ofthe following:
DAVID V. CANTELLA
BOARD OF APPEALS FILE NO. 025-05
Applicant is seeking a MODIFICATION of SPECIAL PERMIT relief granted
under Nantucket Zoning By-law Section 139-33A (alteration/expansion of the pre-
existing nonconforming structure/use), in the Decision in BOA File No. 023-99. Said
Decision allowed the expansion of Applicant's pre-existing nonconforming single-family
. dwelling, by constructing a new entryway onto the front of the house within the required
30-foot front yard setback area without coming any closer to that lot line. Applicant
constructed the addition pursuant to a validly issued building permit. However, the
addition constructed was larger than the addition originally allowed by this Board, though
it came no closer to the front yard lot line than what was permitted. Applicant is seeking
validation of the addition as constructed. A Certificate of Occupancy was issued for the
work in 2000. In addition, the Applicant is seeking new SPECIAL PERMlT relief under
Nantucket Zoning By-law Section 139-33A (alteration/expansion of the pre-existing
nonconforming structure/use) to enlarge an existing addition on the northeasterly side of
the house, that currently is sited as close as about 1.8 feet from the northeasterly side yard
lot line in a district that requires a minimum side yard setback often feet, by constructing
an addition, that would also enclose an existing exterior access to the crawl space. The
new addition would extend vertically about two feet in height (for a maximum height of
about ten feet), extend horizontally about seven feet in a southwesterly direction, and
about one foot in width and be sited within the required front yard setback area as well,
though come not closer to the side or front yard lot lines than the existing structure. The
new addition would continue to contain the existing boiler and provide interior access to
the crawl space. The Lot would continue to meet the maximum allowed ground cover
requirement of 12.5%. The Lot is nonconforming as to lot size with the Lot containing
about 12,682 square feet oflot area in a district that requires a minimum lot size of
20,000 square feet; as to front yard setback with the structure being sited as close as
about 23.2 feet from the front yard lot line in a district that requires a minimum front yard
setback of 30 feet; and as to side yard setback with the structure being sited at zero feet
from the northeasterly side yard lot line in a district that requires a minimum setback of
ten feet. The Premises is located at 12 TENNESSEE AVENUE, Assessor's Map 60.1.2,
Parcel 5, L. C. Plan 3092-S, Lot 2. The pr e is zoned Re .de~I-2.
j\~" ~rcut\/Y
N cy 1. Sevrens, C man
THIS NOTICE IS AVAILABLE IN LARGE PRINT OR OTHER
AL TERNA TIVE FORMATS. PLEASE CALL 508-228-7215 FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION.
NANTUCKET ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
1 EAST CHESTNUT STREET
NANTUCKET, MASSACHUSETTS 02554
CASE NO. CJ 6>-05
FEE: $300.00
APPLICATION FOR RELIEF
Owner's name(s):
Mailing address:
Applicant's name(s):
Mailing address:
Locus address:
David V. Cantella
c/o Reade. Gullicksen. Hanlev & Gifford. LLP
Same
6 Youn2's Way. Post Office Box 2669. Nantucket. Massachusetts 02584
12 Tennessee Avenue. Madaket Assessor's MaplParcel: 60.1.2-5
Land Court PlanIPlaR :Beek & Page!PlaR File N e.:
Date lot acquired: 5/25/93 Cert. of Title:
Uses on Lot - Commercial: None -L Y es (describe)
Residential: Number of dwellings-L Duplex_ Apartments _Rental Rooms
Building Date(s): All pre-date 7n2? x or C ofO(s)?
Building Permit Nos:
Previous Zoning Board Application Nos.:
3092-S
15790
Lot No.:
2
Zoning District: R-2
State below or on a separate addendum specific relief sought (Special Permit, Variance, Appeal), Section of
the Zoning By-law, and supporting details, grounds for grant of relief, listing any existing nonconformities:
~ a 1to 0 ~ cY!-- OJ dJdJs;y ~
I certify that the information contained herein is substantially complete and true to the best of my
knowledge, under the pa. and penalties erjury.
SIGNATURE: Applicant Attorney/Agent x
(If not owner or ower's attorney, please enclose pro f of agency to bring this matter before the Board)
FOR ZBA 0 ICE USE
Application received on:..v./\... g[ By: Complete: Need copies?: m-
Filed with Town Clerk:~~ Plannin. Building Dept.: / By: a
Fee deposited with Town Treasurer:..2:d rC(" By: W aiver req~te .: _ r n.!ed: _/.--!_
Hearing notice posted with Town Clerk: /.l:!:1.!J Mailed:--2!~~OJ I&M:.2 rz,v;/O; & 3J~/.QJ:.,;::-
Hearing(s) held on:_/_/_ Opened on:_/.--!_ Continued to:_/-"_ Withdrawn?:.--!_C
DECISION DUE BY:-"_/_ Made:.--!_/_ Filed wrrown Clerk:_I_I_ Mailed:_/_I_
DECISION APPEALED?:_/.--! _ SUPERIOR COURT: LAND COURT Form 4/03/03
F:\WpC\Cantella\ZBA APP 2005.doc
ADDENDUM
Applicant is seeking a MODIFICATION of SPECIAL PERMIT relief granted under
Nantucket Zoning By-law Section 139-33A (alteration/expansion ofthe pre-existing
nonconforming structure/use), in the Decision in BOA File No. 023-99. Said Decision
allowed the expansion of Applicant's pre-existing nonconforming single-family dwelling,
by allowing the construction ofa new entryway onto the front of the house within the
required 30-foot front yard setback area without coming any closer to that lot line.
Applicant constructed the addition pursuant to a validly issued building permit. However,
the addition constructed was larger than the addition originally allowed by this Board,
though it came no closer to the front yard lot line than what was permitted. Applicant is
seeking validation of the addition as constructed. A Certificate of Occupancy was issued
for the work in 2000.
In addition, the Applicant is seeking new SPECIAL PERMIT relief under Nantucket
Zoning By-law Section 139-33A (alteration/expansion of the pre-existing nonconforming
structure/use) to enlarge an existing addition on the northeasterly side of the house, that
currently is sited as close as about 1.8 feet from the northeasterly side yard lot line in a
district that requires a minimum side yard setback often feet, by constructing an addition,
that would also enclose an existing exterior access to the crawl space. The new addition
would extend vertically about two feet in height (for a maximum height of about ten
feet), extend horizontally about seven feet in a southwesterly direction, and about one
foot in width and be sited within the required front yard setback area as well, though
come not closer to the side or front yard lot lines than the existing structure. The new
addition would continue to contain the existing boiler and provide interior access to the
crawl space. The Lot would continue to meet the maximum allowed ground cover
requirement of 12.5%.
The Lot is nonconforming as to lot size with the Lot containing about 12,682 square feet
oflot area in a district that requires a minimum lot size of20,000 square feet; as to front
yard setback with the structure being sited as close as about 23.2 feet from the front yard
lot line in a district that requires a minimum front yard setback of 30 feet; and as to side
yard setback with the structure being sited at zero feet from the northeasterly side yard lot
line in a district that requires a minimum setback of ten feet.
:')18.:1
':JUt s;~opossv ~ n;JA)j:JOI8@
3^OSV 031VlS 3Sn 030N3lNI SlI
NVH1 ~3HlO 3SOd~nd ~I3HlO ).J-N ClO.:l 03Sn 38 10N 1WHS NVld StH1
'SO~0~3~
HOSS3SSV 13>lOru.N'VN .:10 NM01lN3HHnO 01 ~NIOHOOOV NMOHS 3W
S3ml3dOHd ~NINIOrov .:10 SH3NMO 'NMOHS AlH3dOHd 3Hl .:10 dlHSH3NMO
~O 311ll 3Hl 01 SV NOIl'f.)I.:IlUl3~ V iON SI N\f1d NOU~3dSNI StHl
'O~0~3H .:10
SNV1d ONV sma lN3HH~ NO ,l,13H NMOHS S3NI1 AlH3dOHd 3Hl
'S3Slrrnld 3Hl NO S3HfUonHlS ,QIVTlIONlf }.IN HO S3~03H 'S30N3.:l
.S3Nn .l.ilI3dOHd HSnSV.153 01 03sn 38 LON 01nOHS N\f1d SIHl
'J..Wlns lN3vtnWSNI l1n.:l v 03H301SNOO 38 01 iON SI ONV A1NO
S3S0dHnd 3~"f-)lHOYi HO.:l 03HVd3Hd SVM NVld NOl103dSNI StH1
'03SIA3H Al1Y.:lIOOICl3d SV ONV 9B6l '~ 3Nnr :Sdlffl
.:10 3lVO 3AU03.:l.:l3 'AON3~V 1N3W3~~ AON3~H3Yi3
"MJ303.:1 3Hl AS 10' . , gl ' OO-O~ZOgZ :(l39YinN
13NVd )JJNOYiYiOO / 'VfHT.:I NO m1\f3Nn30 ' . J "9: ( ~v
:3NOZ OWZVH 0001.:1 NI 031Y.>01 3t1V NMOHS S3SIYi3Hd
3Hl1\fH1 13~031MON)t AYi .:10 1$38 3Hl 01 '}jIlH30 I
'S~3H10 ON GNV' ' . , . . . . , : g ':S~' ( . )IJ'(Y'S' .
SbN i}'-is' 'S1-j..c3~ ' 3;"'~' NoiGos' . '3}li' :01
8~ -EI 9aJ8-BIf li89J 'ZL:" ~a
r99Z0 sJ~asmpt1Sft1l ';a'lmrUlD N
1i'a:Al S ,Bu.ftO 1: 9
sJ.04an..ms putYf Jf1UDJ$S3Jo.I.cI
.:mI 'S<fI:JOSSf " n:IJV!:JV7<<
rCJ3mlOa3~ 38 OllONI
. ,'3/-:'v'3Ss3Nl'.i3J..z'I :sn:X>l S ":i''''re :dori xOl
....
i' . . S .: tbo~ '~'i :uOld 6 6i.~" :..t2J.3:J' :.p;O /p~;O
2 ..1.01 .
. .. . . . . . .. . .. .. .. .. . . .. . .. . . .. .. .. . . .
'...,".'.'.' 'VT73lf(~j-;a'^'va'
oooz 'rfJrl'r;' :Q3S/A1Ci
~b61 'O~ 11;:td.'v' :JIV'O ~z =.~ :31V'OS
~~~ o~~@~m
lYID
.
~Wj]@] ~@llJh@~€l~~~
~@)\!7@)J1~@~
:J;UMO
'3A'V
l::ci0::/ 33583/'11'/3.1
: '''!5l . ./
.-.. : .......<./ J :
. I el"{'1- f I I I
~ (:N~rN: I: :N
I:!-'I~. .~: ~: I~ :~
,.:1\\_ .' '~l till IN ;1\\
~ H-. '. .) I -, I , '1+-
, -./ _ ~ 1--1 -i--
_~- I I I I -
: I I I :
C:XygL
---,1
I
ss::r:X)Y
,3.:>"V'dG '.M11<l.)
a:::r<!13AO;Jtm
I
,
,
.
-1\\
:~
:eo
,1-1-'
gSQg8-i1O ';)00
. J.l'I3V'13S'v'3
,)..l.Jd. n s ~3.L '\1/'1
. --:--
~02 aOOi..::l
s. 3J'i 07. a 001.:1
o
~l'llT1.3.Mcr
.J.~O$ ~
~
c:c
It-
')10/ d
J..S
ssO;;:tJ
g 3/'10Z <100'=:1
. - '---,g'v~N'oZ-cioo'::l-
.'-.!)
9
8
~
~
-I
5-2601:: ';)'1 'V.L0l
'..1.';:J >(3.3~J a'rtoCtfJ
. ..:if /II
g - 'Z'ro<:)
./
~
/.;>-,y-
- -- /:;'}'
../ :-~:> (:\.
..-~
:~~$:G:: :
'1. t :z,' , ;(~) ~oo ONno~~
, i:J' oj . , ;'a:s 301S '1J HV3~
. 'i.d '08 . , :'9'S O~A 1NO~.:I
. . :i.~' s;'L' , . :3~\f1NO~j 'NIYi
, . '~:8' 00002 ' :v3~ 'NIl'l
Z -;;t :N0l1Y31:HS,SY13 StUNOl
.. "
. , . . . . . .
'~ns OtM ~NlA:lilll3~ 3Hl
AS 03~OtOOV' 38 11VHS
N'fld SlHi .:10 S3k100 03SH00N3
aNY <BclVNlS Al1v.NI~tHO A1NO
.. ..
NY:Y . 3:3S .
. . . . . . . .
.:::!'S-.=Z8:)ZI
::>NUSIX3
t::J,~ ,
/'
/'
/'
/'
/'
UllIZ
rrC)
ij\)>n\
I;Z:..
r1:IZ
-()>C)
"11-{-l
~2)>
:Iil~
UlmiU
~iU~
~ ~
-{
C::=
Z C====.. =--
/'
/'
/'
/'
/'
Z
<t
-1
(L
oc
()
()
-1
11-
t- ~
U) I
(i II
11- :;
=
.
-<1
z
()
t-
<t
>
ill
-1
ill
-:I
t-
=:J
()
d) !
~
I
II
IS3~ VI l::LLI\JVJ II
r I
-<1
II
mB
z
<(
-I
0- ~
I
ill "
t- -
N
d) ~
m
z
0-
t-
<(
>
ill
-1
ill
t- ~
<f) I
<( "
"<I:
ill ~
~\\
()
~I
-l)
I
11\
,,<;1-,""
,,('-,6
,,(.-,<;1
I:
I..'J()
Z()
i=[}I
~O
XW
w[Q
( 1
I..'J
~"
I-z
Q)-
-z
x-
wO
00
D"
00
~z
_llJ
I-:I
Q)U
X~
llJ~
~ .'It-\ ~ of(Jft'({rc(/
n. l'.t
~ \
.11 "/[j<1
'1 . V
(~~j\(
r
. i~l
';) 1\J
rJ \1:1 \. ' 'Y"
.\it)J '-\ '( \J
('r:... [.. +-,'. (
l,,\ "'\ \ [,(J
Cd~~)' '
TOWN OF NANTUCKET
BOARD OF APPEALS
NANTUCKET, MASSACHUSETTS 02554
Date:
May
, I
, 19 99
To: Parties in Interest and, Others concerned with the
Decision of the BOARD OF APPEALS in the Application of the
following:
Application No.:
023-99
Owner/Applicant:
DAVID V. CANTELLA
Enclosed is the Decision of the BOARD OF APPEALS which has
this day been filed in the office of the Nantucket Town
Clerk.
An Appeal from this Decision may be taken pursuant to
Section 17 of Chapter 40A, Massachusetts General Laws.
Any action appealing the Decision must be brought by
filing an complaint in court within TWENTY (20) days after
this day's date. Notice of the action with a copy of the
complaint and certified copy of the Decision must be given
to the Town Clerk so as to be received within such TWENTY
(20) days.
J1% (j} \Utli~Q
Dale W. Waine Chairman
cc: Town Clerk
Planning Board
Building Commissioner
PLEASE NOTE: MOST SPECIAL PERMITS AND VARIANCES HAVE A TIME
LIMIT AND WILL EXPIRE IF NOT ACTED UPON ACCORDING' TO NANTUCKET
ZONING BY-LAW ~139-30I (SPECIAL PERMITS); ~139-32I (VARIANCES)
ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE CALL THE NANTUCKET ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS.
TOWN OF NANTUCKET
ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
37 WASHINGTON STREET
NANTUCKET, MASSACHUSETIS 02554
PHONE 508-228-7215
FAX 508-228-7205
Assessor's Map 60.1.2
Parcel 5
R-2
12 Tennessee Avenue, Madaket
Land Court Plan 3092-S, Lot 2
Cert. of Title No. 14,197
At a Public Hearing of the Nantucket Zoning Board of Appeals held
at 1:00 P.M., Friday, March 12, 1999, in the Conference Room, Town and
County Building, 37 Washington Street, Nantucket, Massachusetts, on the
Application of DAVID V. CANT ELLA , of 191 Marlboro Street, Apt. 3, Boston,
MA 02116, Board of Appeals File No. 023-99, the Board made the following
Decision:
1. Applicant is seeking relief by SPECIAL PERMIT under Nantucket
Zoning Bylaw ~139-33A (alteration/expansion of a pre-existing
nonconforming structure/use). Applicant proposes to construct a 64+
square-foot enclosed entry room onto the front of the said to be
pre-existing nonconforming single-family dwelling. The Lot contains
12,682~ square feet of lot area in a district that requires a minimum lot
size of 20,000 square feet. The dwelling is nonconforming as to setbacks,
being sited 23.2~ feet at its closest point from the front yard lot line
in a district that requires a minimum of a 30-foot front yard setback and
has a zero easterly side yard setback at its closest point in a district
that requires a minimum side yard setback of 10 feet. The proposed
addition would be sited 20.31+ feet from the front yard lot line.
In the alternative, Applicant is seeking relief by VARIANCE
pursuant to Nantucket Zoning Bylaw ~139-16A (Intensity Regulations _
setbacks) in order to construct the aforementioned addition as proposed.
A Special Permit, allowing construction of a similar addition that
was to come no closer to the front yard lot line than 23.2+ feet, was
issued by the Board of Appeals in Case No. 072-94; however, the Applicant
was unable to proceed with the project at that time, and the Special
Permit has accordingly lapsed.
The Premises is located at 12 TENNESSEE AVENUE, MADAKET,
Assessor's Map 60.1.2, Parcel 5, shown on Land Court Plan 3092-S as Lot
2. The property is zoned Residential-2.
2. The Decision is based upon the Application and materials submitted
with it and the testimony and evidence presented at the Hearing. There
was one (1) letter on file that expressed no objection provided that
there be no further encroachment in the setback area as measured from
"G" Street. The Planning Board made no recommendation as the matter was
not of planning concern.
3. Applicant, through counsel, represents that the proposed project
is the same as that which was approved in 072-94 with no other
alterations planned. Applicant proposes to construct a 64~ square-foot
enclosed entry-way onto the front of a pre-existing nonconforming
single-family dwelling. Said addition would encroach further into the
nonconforming front yard setback area, sited 20.31~ feet from Tennessee
Avenue rather than at the current 23.2~ feet, in a district that requires
a minimum front yard setback of 30 feet. The ground cover ratio would be
increased from l,l03~ square feet (8.7~%) to 1,167~ square feet (9.2~%)
with the maximum ground cover ratio allowable in the R-2 zoning district
being 12.5%.
4. As it did in its 1994 Special Permit Decision No. 072-94 in this
matter, the Board finds that the proposed addition would be an
intensification of the nonconforming front yard setback, further
encroaching into said setback area, and is unable to justify grounds for
a grant of Variance relief under Nantucket Zoning Bylaw g139-16A and
literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Bylaw would not
involve a substantial hardship, financial or otherwise, with said
hardship being created by the Applicant. Therefore upon a request by
Applicant to WITHDRAW WITHOUT PREJUDICE the request for VARIANCE relief,
the Board so voted unanimously.
5. However, the Board does find that a proposed alteration that would
come no closer to the front yard lot line than the existing structure,
though an intensification of the massing of the structure within the
setback area, would not be substantially more detrimental to the
neighborhood than the existing nonconformities, with the addition being
modest in size with minimal impact on the area and no increase in
intensity of use.
6. Accordingly, by a unanimous vote, the Board GRANTS the requested
SPECIAL PERMIT under Nantucket Zoning Bylaw g139-33A to alter and extend
the single-family dwelling by adding an entry-way room onto the front of
the structure subject to the following conditions:
a. The addition shall not increase the nonconforming front yard
setback and be sited no closer to that lot line than 23.2+ feet at its
closest point; and
b. The addition shall be constructed in substantial conformance
with the Certificate of Appropriateness No. 32,507 issued by the Historic
District Commission. The Board notes that the Order of Conditions No.
SE-48-414 issued by the Conservation Commission, and included as
condition lib" in paragraph "5" of the Decision in BOA File No. 072-94,
has arguably expired and cannot be used as a valid condition in this
Decision as a new Order of Conditions had not been sought as of the date
of this Deci,7:n~ggg{~)~w CU(h~
D Ie W. Wain ~
!\0~
Edward Murphy
ZONING' CLASSIFICATION: 1(- Z EXISTING:
MIN. AAEA: . ~c?c;>9. ?X.. . . !:~~~~~.F
MIN. FRONTAGE: , . . ~ . F;J;. . . ?'!=~. ~A;N
fRONT YARD S.B.: . . :39, ':T. . . . ~ . . . : .
REAR & SIDE S.B.: . . ~q .FT. . . . . Of. . . : .
GROUND COVER (:1:): . .'.2: ~f!.. . . .8:~ ~ ~.
c.j(. ~ ~~ ~
~i'- _ - -
;l.\~rt.../ !
,/ ~I\
I
f-
~
GO./.2 - 3
N/r
8RoAD eRn:/( R. T.
lOT A L.c. 3092-8
ONLY ORIGINAlLY STAMPED mo
ENDORSED COPIES Of THIS PlAN
SHAll BE ACKNO'M..EDGED BY
THE CERTIFYING lAND SURVEYOR.
,;/;
~.
/;/
/'
./
~'
/e;;,
.---/
~'
I
u
~------
GO./.2. - 4
IVIF
P./v(. REIS TrcUCKlI-.fG. INC'.
LOT 1 L.e 3092 - 6
- - . L~.D_ ZO"'E: 4.5
FLOOD '-io..Jf.----i>-
CPQSS
ST
.+1
en
~
t :sTORY
DW'ELLi}jG
o
r---
I
I
I
I
!~
---,
t
~
FLooO 7.01-1f: 'B
F"LOOD 7.o'j.jE:c
~
WATER SUP'f'lY-/'
EASE'MENr
DOC." 3505"8
! 75.0')
TENN E:SSE:E:
AVE.
~FJ:'
~Fr
TO: . T}{E, . . ~~S!qA{ .~I'(~. ~~'f~S. .sA'!'!t1G;~
. .B.~~.,F~.~: . . . . . . . . AND NO OTHERS.
I CERTIfY, TO THE BEST OF !.IY KNO'll1..EDGE. THAT THE
PREMISES SHOWN ARE LOCATED IN flOOD HAZARD ZONE:
A~ J ~,. t:; . , DEUNfATED ON r.l.R.M. / COMMUNITY PANEl
NUMBER: 250230-00 . .I~ . . . D. BY THE FEDERAl
EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY. EfFECTIVE DATE or
MAPS: JUNE 3, 1986 AND 1S PERIODICAlLY REVISED.
THIS INSPECTION PlAN W1S PREPAAED rOR MORTGAGE PURPOSES
ONLY AND IS NOT TO BE CONSIDERED A FULlINSTRUI.fENT SURVEY.
THIS PlAN SHOULD NOT BE USED TO ESTAIlUSH PROPERlY UNES.
FENCES, HEDGEs OR }.NY ANCIllARY STRUC1URES ON THE PREl./ISES.
THE PROPERTY LINES SHOWN RELY ON CURRENT DEEDS AND PlANS
OF RECORD.
THIS INSPECTION PlAN IS NOT A CERnflCJ.TION AS TO THE TITlE OR
OWNERSHIP or THE PROPERTY SHOWN. OWNERS or ADJOINING PROPERTIES
ME SHOWN ACCORDING TO CURRENT TOWN Of NANTUCKET 1SSESSOR
RECORDS.
THIS PU.N SHALL NOT BE USED rOR my OTHER PURPOSE OTHER lrWi
ITS INTENDED USE STAlED ABOVE.
@Block..elJ " Associott3 Inc.
1NaI@~lr~@~
~!M@~[gg;iiil@~ ~[s&1M
il1il
~~~~'ii'D ~~
SCALE: r= z5' DATE: APRIL 30, 1'n3
Owner: . Q"1v,/J). ~~'!r:E:.'+4 AMP. -!~1{1{/f7P;. .
CAAlTE::LLA
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Lc;T' 2" . . . .
DeedjCert.: .Cf;~-r: . I~ !'7,7, Plan: ~.c;. ;?Q"J1. ~ $. . .
Tax Map: ~'."~~~.5. Locus:-!Z. r.9./!.f1f:S:S~.A:~. .
, .....ft...~I""'
[NOT TO BE RECORDED I
BLACKWELL ct ASSOCIATES, Inc.
ProJessioMJ. Land Surv~ors
6 Young's Way
Nantucket, Massachusetts 02554
B' -71 (508) 228-9026 n ~_ _ ,
F8K.:
Jts-.XJ
Town of Nantucket
ZONING BOARD OF APPEAL~
REcEIVED
BOARD OF ASSESSORS.
FEB - 82005.
TOWN OF
NANTUCKET, MA
LIST OF' P....~TlES rN INTEREST IN THE MAT!CR OFTIiE PETITION OF' .
p 3a ';'4 r: Ctld-e1ICL
ROPER TY OWNER........................... ......, .... ....... ......................,...
M^' LrNG A DqRESS... ~l9. .R~M.~.,.. .q.~~.FsJ.t~~~.,..,~.~~~.~!.. .~..~.~~~.~!~.~. LLP
PROPERTY LOCATION......,.....I.~..,~~r.~.~~
....S5 ES SORS M^ PrP A ReEL...... Ul1~. t. i?. ,"'::. ,?................................
A PPUCA NT. . r~..4~.,. ~~,lH<~~,~~,~, ~~~,leJ, .~ , ~~f!~',d, "L~P.j:r ,p,.vid' V. ':40?1~
SEE A1TACHED PAGES
I cenify that the: foregoing is Ilbl ofpcl'1ons who lle; ownel'1 oftbuninc propeny. ownel'1 of .
liU1d directl}' oj)~Osile On 11'I)' publie or private $lreet Or WI)': and abutters of lhe abutters and all
other land ""wner5 within 300 feet of the propel'T)' line of owner.s property, III as they lppCL'" On
the most rcecnl applicable IIX list CM.G.L. c. 40A. Section 11 Zoninl Co<1e Chapter J 39. .
Swion I )9-29D (2)
#-Rk./I;...P?~~
~41P~
D"TE .
ASSESSOR'S OFFICE
Town OrNanlue~et
t!l
~~
rJl
H .
~E-<
rJlr:}
Il:U
~~
~
...
" !<!< !<!<
~ !<"''''~'''l.lil~
~ ggaaaa =~H~ii~~
~ ~111111::lil~~~~~
: ~~~~=~:;Q)~cn~~~~~~~
"
tll
'"
'"
!<!< !< !< !< !<
.... ... ~ .... 1"'1 .... .. ... ... ... C"4 .. ... ,., .... .... ....
W'lIl'lIl'lOOU"lU'1lnll'lWlt--II1U'l...t....COIn
Clll'lltlll'lo\o\Il'IWlll'llOan"'II'IU'l"1""'41ft1l'l
.... C"tC'tC"tf'tNt"4NNNlNnNlNOONN
N OOOC'tNOOOOOriOOCDCOOO
In ~~~~~~~~~~~~~88s:!s:!
.. ..
.. ..
H H
:> :>
~ ~ ~ ~ ~
5Ummmmm
~ ~
.. ..
WI
WI
.
~
..
"
...
...
i
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ = ~ ~ =... ~ M ~ i ~ ~ ~ ·
W~=~~;:=~Jk=l>> ~AA~....
WI 5!"'~:'l:'l"'~"'Il",:",...tt.....
: lil~ ....~ ~~;OS:~~~~~
.::; lQIQ :::~tQ tQO~r;ttl)CQ~~iIIlQ
~ ~2===2~2""CJ\~...2~,.,22
.. ..
i
'"
WI
I
.
.
..
~
~
~ ..
'"
i ~
M
.. .. !:
~ .. !i1
~ '" ~
t: ~ ~
':3 .. 0
il .. ..
~ .. <l
'" ~ 9
" .. iil
8 0 ~
~...
.. "
~ ~
.. ..
..
E
t:
S
~ ~
o 0
~
gj '" ~
::d~
" " M
= = !:
a a !i!
<l <l ~
o 0
~ ~ ~H
... ...
" "
o
"
'"
..
..
~
'"
H
'"
H
H
'"
~ a gj
" M '" ~ '" '" = ~
~ " ~ E ~ ~ ~ E ~ ~ ~ i
e ~.... =- 8'.. ,,:;l ..
~ ...... ~ ~ .. ~ ...... ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ : M 0 ~ : ~ 0 0 a =
. ~~~~~~~:~~I~~~~~~
! ta~==l:a8~li!ldeli!li!lEt
. t';~=mfl)6 ,.;~.. ~II1Dat::tj
~ i::"'~"'~~"'~:2..aa~~~aa~i::
e ~..~ 98!:H<lt:....<l<l"'~
6 '" .. '" iil = ~ ~ ~ i 8 8 ~ ~ ~ '"
~
0\
o
r-
...
0\
..
...
l5
... ..
~ N"'\G:::=;~r--r--co:::~~~~~t;
o
o
'"
...
...
...
......
'"
rtNNrtC"l"f\lIl""'4...riMI"'fr1f"4r4....rt
i ~~~55S~~~~E~~EE~~
Town of Nantucket
16 Broad Street
Nantucket, MA 02554
T ennessee Avenue, LLC
1877 Field Road
Charlottesville, VA 22903
Roger 1. & Jacquelyn C. Jette, Tr
c/o James P. & Mary R. Taafee
PO Box 1241
Nantucket, MA 02554
Jacqueline K. Weyand
34-1094 St.
Jackson Heights, NY 11372
Lars O. & Nancy M. Soderberg
c/o Lars O. & Jane F. Soderberg
3 Sunset Drive
Cherry Hills Village, CO 80113
P&M Reis Trucking, Inc.
PO Box 113
Nantucket, MA 02554
Maddaquet Admiralty
PO Box 191
Nantucket, MA 02554
William E. & Ruth Grieder, Trs
The Maddequet Nominee Trust
4 Chapel Way
Nantucket, MA 02554
Cheryl K. Coffin, etal, Trustees
Six Sisters Realty Trust
4 S. Pasture Lane
Nantucket, MA 02554
William P. Westcott, Trustee
Lambi Nominee Trust
PO Box 2084
Nantucket, MA 02584
Randolph Sharp, Jr.
14 Tennessee Avenue
Nantucket, MA 02554
Mary Ann Brooks Trustee
Brooks Realty Trust
19 Tennessee Avenue
Nantucket, MA 02554
Lars O. & Nancy M. Soderberg
9 Tennessee Avenue
Nantucket, MA 02554
Cynthia Collins
PO Box 1339
Nantucket, MA 02554
Nantucket Conservation
Foundation, Inc.
PO Box 13
Nantucket, MA 02554