HomeMy WebLinkAbout012-06
TOWN OF NANTUCKET
BOARD OF APPEALS
-'
NANTUCKET, MASSACHUSETTS 02554
Date:
~OJLtrlf, 2cO({J
To: Parties in Interest and. Others concerned with the
Decrslon of the BOARD OF APPEALS in the Application of the
following:
Owner/Applicant:
0[2- -0(0
WCLQii?r ondJ rJYbnLyV) RO-bd7_
Application No.:
Enclosed is the Decision of the BOARD OF APPEALS which has
this day been filed in the office of the Nantucket Town
Clerk.
An Appeal from this Decision may be taken pursuant to
Section 17 of Chapter 40A, Massachusetts General Laws.
Any action appealing the Decision must be brought by
filing an complaint in court within TWENTY (20) days after
this day's date. Notice of the action with a copy of the
complaint and certified copy of the Decision must be given
to the Town Clerk so as to be received within such TWENTY
(20) days.
cc: Town Clerk
Planning Board
Building Commissioner
PLEASE NOTE: MOST SPECIAL PERMITS AND VARIANCES HAVE A TIME
LIMIT AND WILL EXPIRE IF NOT ACTED UPON ACCORDING' TO NANTUCKET
ZONING BY-LAW ~139-30I (SPECIAL PERMITS); ~139-32I (VARIANCES)
ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE CALL THE NANTUCKET ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS.
NANTUCKET ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
1 East Chestnut Street
Nantucket, Massachusetts 02554
Assessor's Map 56, Parcel 8
25 Hummock Pond Road
Residential-2
Deed Book 155, Page 306
Plan Book 19, Page 13
Lot 9
DECISION:
1. At a public hearing of the Nantucket Zoning Board of
Appeals, on Friday February 10, 2006, at 12:00 P.M. in the
Conference Room, Town Annex Building, 37 Washington Street,
Nantucket, Massachusetts, the Board made the following Decision
on the Application of WALTER AND MARILYN RABETZ, c/o Sarah F.
Alger, P.C., Two South Water Street, Nantucket, Massachusetts
02554, BOA File No. 012-06.
2. Applicants are seeking relief by SPECIAL PERMIT under
Nantucket Zoning By-law (the "By-law") Section 139-16 (C) 1, to
reduce the northerly rear yard setback from ten feet to eight
feet and the easterly side yard setback from ten feet to seven
feet in order to validate the siting of a 1986 addition and deck
(permitted in the Decision in BOA File No. 109-86). The addition
and deck are sited as close as about 8.8 feet from the rear lot
line and as close as about 7.6 feet from the side yard lot line
in a district that requires a minimum side and rear yard setback
of ten feet. In the alternative, Applicants are seeking relief
by SPECIAL PERMIT under Section 139-16C (2) in order to validate
the unintentional rear yard setback intrusion as stated above.
In addition, the Applicants are seeking relief by VARIANCE under
By-law Section 139-16A (Intensity regulations frontage) to
validate the sub minimum frontage of about 28.49 along Hummock
Pond Road in a district that requires a minimum frontage of 75
feet; and under By-law Section 139-160, (Intensity regulations -
regularity), to the extent necessary, to validate the
noncomplying regularity factor, which is calculated at .50 rather
than the required .55. The Locus is also nonconforming as to the
minimum ten-foot side yard setback requirement as the primary
dwelling is sited as close as about 8.3 feet from the westerly
side yard lot line. The Locus conforms to all other dimensional
requirements of the Zoning By-law.
The Premises is located at 25 HUMMOCK POND ROAD,
Assessor's Map 56, Parcel 8, Plan Book 19, Page 13, Lot 9. The
property is zoned Residential-2.
3. Our Decision is based upon the Application and
accompanying materials and representations and testimony received
at our public hearings. The Planning Board did not have an
opportunity to review this matter and thus rendered no
recommendation. There was no opposition presented in person or
by counsel at the public hearing.
in the file from abutters.
There were letters of support
4. The Applicants, through counsel, stated that they were
seeking relief by Special Permit under Nantucket Zoning By-Law
Section 139-16(C)1 to reduce the easterly side yard setback
distance from ten feet to about 7.6 feet and the rear yard
setback to approximately 8.9 feet as shown on the "Building
Location Plan" dated January 18, 2006, done by Charles W. Hart &
Associates, Inc. (the "Plot Plan"), a reduced copy of which is
attached hereto as Exhibit A. Applicants received a building
permit dated July 2, 1985, pursuant to the original Decision in
BOA File No. 109-86, to construct an addition consisting of an
artist studio to an existing garage. Applicants constructed the
addition and the deck; however, they never obtained a final sign
off or a Certificate of Occupancy for their work. In their
building permit application, they indicated that the proposed
addition would be at least ten feet from the side and rear yard
lot lines. Unfortunately, in siting the addition, they were
under the mistaken impression that a fence thought to be located
on the property defined their lot lines, and they set the
addition ten feet from the fence. Now, twenty years later, it
has been brought to their attention that the addition is actually
sited within the ten foot setback required in the R-2 District.
5. Applicants represented that during the course of the
permitting process for the 1985 addition, Applicants were
informed by letter dated July 16, 1986 by the Building Inspector
that they had to obtain zoning relief to validate the inadequate
frontage and noncompliance with the regularity factor. The Lot,
as well as the lot located immediately north of the property, was
created in 1975 as a result of a division of "Land of Charles F.
Davis", shown on a plan prepared by Josiah S. Bartlett dated May
19, 1975, a reduced copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit
B, which plan was endorsed by the Nantucket Planning Board as an
Approval Not Required Plan as the property consisted of two
buildings that had existed since a time prior to 1955. This
subdivision, and the fact that the Locus was put into ownership
separate and distinct from all adjacent land by the conveyance of
the adjacent lot on October 14, 1975,and has remained separate to
the present. By Decision dated October 3, 1986, the Zoning Board
of Appeals granted relief by Special Permit to allow the addition
but, for reasons not explained in said Decision, did not grant
the Variance relief requested and necessary to cure the
nonconforming frontage and regularity factor.
6. Applicants argue that although garage/studio zoning
nonconformities are now protected from enforcement action due to
the passage of time under the provisions of the curative statute,
Applicants are seeking relief by Variance and Special Permit to
cure all of the nonconformities and validate their lot as
separately marketable and buildable. The Locus meets all other
dimensional requirements of the By-law, including parking, with
2
the exception of the nonconforming side yard setback of the
primary dwelling, with is a pre-1972 structure and clearly shown
on a 1957 aerial in the Town records.
7. Therefore, based upon the foregoing, the Board makes
the following findings:
(a) That relief under Section 139-16(C)1 of the Zoning
By-law to allow the reduction in the rear yard set back to 8.9
feet and the easterly side yard set back to 7.6 feet is in
harmony with the general purpose and intent of the By-law and the
minimal impact to the abutters is far outweighed by the burden of
removing the structure. The Board notes that the setback
intrusions have existed for twenty years without incident or
comment from abutters.
(b) That Variance relief under Section 139-16A
(frontage) and Section 139-160 (regularity factor) is justified
due to the unique circumstances relating to the history of the
property, the irregular shape of the Lot, and topography of the
structures, particularly the siting of the structures to the rear
of the lot and up against a steep slope, and especially affecting
the Locus and not affecting generally the Residential-2 zoning
district in which the lot is situated. Literal enforcement of
the By-law in this case would involve substantial hardship,
financial and otherwise, to the Applicants, and the desired
relief may be granted without substantial detriment to the public
good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the
intent or purpose of the By-law. In addition, granting such
relief would be consistent with the relief granted by this Board
in similar cases involving lots created by ANR due particularly
to the presence of pre-1955 structures on the lots.
8. Accordingly, by UNANIMOUS vote, the Board of Appeals
GRANTS relief by SPECIAL PERMIT under Nantucket Zoning By-law
Sections 139-16(C)1 to allow the side yard setback on the
easterly side of the Premises to be reduced from ten feet to
approximately 7.6 feet and the rear yard set back from ten feet
to about 8.9 feet; and relief by VARIANCE under Sections 139-16A
(frontage) and 139-160 (regularity factor) to validate the Lot as
presently configured with about 28.49 feet of frontage on Hummock
Pond Road and the noncomplying regularity of the Lot at about
.50; based upon the following conditions:
(a) The structures are located substantially as shown
on Exhibit A; and
(b) There shall be no further building or expansion
within the required ten-foot side yard setback
areas.
3
(BOA File No. 012-06)
Dated: February 14, 2006
Edward Murphy
4
SCALE: 1 "= 50' DATE: JANUARY 18. 2006 ~
Owner: . . . . WA~TJ~ .&:. f.,/.4R{Lm ~" f1Af3~l. . . . . ~#a
V'~ Po
W/}
.tf>04/}
CURRENT ZONING CLASSIFICATION:
Residential 2 (R-2)
EXISTING:
20,000 S.F.
75 FT.
30 FT.
10 FT.
12.5%
MINIMUM LOT SIZE:
MINIMUM FRONTAGE:
FRONT YARD SETBACK:
REAR/SIDE SETBACK:
GROUND COVER % :
.2.6.6.39* . $.F:.
. SE:E. fL.AN. .
. SE:E. fL.AN. .
. $E;E. fL,AN. .
. SE;E. fL.AN. .
PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR
THIS PLOT PLAN WAS PREPARED FOR THE TOWN
OF NANTUCKET BUILDING DEPARTMENT ONLY AND
SHOULD NOT BE CONSIDERED A PROPERTY LINE
SURVEY. THIS PLAN SHOULD NOT BE USED TO
ESTABLISH PROPERTY LINES. FENCES. HEDGES OR
ANY ANCILLARY STRUCTURES ON THE PREMISES.
THE PROPERTY LINES SHOWN RELY ON CURRENT
DEEDS AND PLANS OF RECORD.
THIS PLOT PLAN IS NOT A CERTIFICATION AS TO
TITlE OR OWNERSHIP OF THE PROPERTY SHOWN.
OWNERS OF ADJOINING PROPERTIES ARE SHOWN
ACCORDING TO CURRENT ASSESOR RECORDS.
ASSESSOR MAP: . . q6. . , PARCEL: . E} .
BUILDING LOCATION PLAN
OF LAND IN'
NANTUCKET, MASS.
Deed: . . .105.-,306. . . . Pion: . . .1.9:-1J . . . . . .
Locus: , . . . .#.2~ .H.UMMOCK. fQN.D. ~O.AO. . .
CHARLES Jr. HART cmd ASSOCIATES, Inc.
Professional Land Surueyors
49 SPARKS A VENUE
NANTUCKET. MASS. 02554
(508) 228-8910
56-7
N/F
R. &: L. FEDER
56-277
N/F
J.P. RAY
.....
It)
~
10
56-9
N/F
M. WERNICK
i
~
~
~
.....
56-10
N/F
P.J. &: D.A. LEARY
H-6914
LAND OF,
CHARLES F. DAVIS
IV1 A '< I "I. I q "15
/, ,
I ~ 1>0
-oCALE.
00S1AH 5. 13AR.R.E.'T, Su~ve:'(oR.
o ~~-r
s l' "-
M \ I- Y( . 5 i' l<
.._"..~r-l 8-;': ~~~ 8 ~
.r' ~ 0
(.0')...66 ;': ... 00 ~
'~ " . A tt..,q 1 7 a ~ s. F". :
s.~ - 579" oS"7"/:
.....
~
IT
/38,07
~tJ
>-
Q
c(
Ik'
t1 \!I
S.M."
E
III
>
<(
o
III i;,
\- :j:
- ~
9
... ~
o 0
o.i:f-
f'l
- i--
o
<(
It!
<t
-I
'V
t...
\l1
w
J
t:I!
q:
I
\J
::l.tDw38
s_~
.
co(
~
l')
I-
Q
-J
""
<i
A ~EA
"-.
<.
;~"'r .
~r,,'''3<t,~-7It;,
"". c.o.
Ii
~
10
o
t{
>-
Q
Cf
~
\!)
i
...
-3
'i
<t
~
<r
.J
V
-5 ue DIVISID~ OF
LOT 1 -PLAN
DATED .JUNE lS:l~7'
LAN!) OF CflAI?LES F.
DAVIS -13 \8 to I;LIP
lq
....
.
r<I
:t
I-
o
-J
A PP~OVAL
CONI'ROL
IV 6a:'1o-t ~8.S'o'
L. -2",
'"7U^,/ -<'8' <'13
, "1oC f( '"
~O"'D
UNDER. THE 5ueDIV1StON
LAW NOT R.E..~UIR.E 0
~04D
e>>.6
N
w
E
lDtS il$ shewn hi,,'- In\t~oa~~f'
wn~j1 w:I~; ~r~;~n: mlli.'l.Illeq"ir~men!s.
BOAR.D
MAY :~ :.' 1975 ' c'
RFCEIVCSI AND fHIT.I;~l) WI\ H
,N.A.NTlJCt;U COUNt '( !.'!~'U~; FlOOK 1/1=
/ C:.i i -:-':
:~C-j_~
~ j}L~-
TOWN OF NANTUCKET
ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
1 EAST CHESTNUT STREET
NANTUCKET, MASSACHUSETTS 02554
PHONE 508-228-7215
FAX 508-228-7205
NOTICE
A Public Hearing of the NANTUCKET ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS will
be held at 12:00 P.M.. FRIDAY, FEBRUARY 10, 2006, IN THE CONFERENCE
ROOM, TOWN ANNEX BUILDING, 37 Washington Street, Nantucket,
Massachusetts, on the Application of the following:
W ALTER AND MARILYN S. RABETZ
BOARD OF APPEALS FILE NO. 012-06
Applicants are seeking relief by SPECIAL PERMIT under Nantucket Zoning By-
law Section 139-16C(1) to reduce the northerly rear yard setback requirement from ten
feet to eight feet and the easterly side yard setback requirement from ten feet to seven feet
in order to validate the siting of a 1986 addition and deck (permitted in the Decision in
BOA File No. 109-86). The addition and deck are sited as close as about 8.8 feet from the
rear yard lot line and as close as about 7.6 feet from the side yard lot line. In the
alternative, Applicants are seeking relief by SPECIAL PERMIT under Section 139-
16C(2) in order to validate the unintentional rear yard setback intrusion as stated above.
In addition, the Applicants are seeking reliefby VARIANCE under Section 139-16A
(Intensity regulations - frontage) to validate the subminimum frontage of about 28.49
feet and under Section 139-16D, (Intensity regulations - regularity), to the extent
necessary, to validate the noncomplying regularity factor. The Locus is also
nonconforming as to regularity factor; as to the ten-foot side yard setback requirement as
the main house is sited as close as about 8.3 feet from the westerly side yard lot line; and
as to frontage with the lot containing about 28.49 feet of frontage on Hummock Pond
Road in a district that requires a minimum frontage of75 feet. The Locus conforms to all
other dimensional requirements of the Zoning By-law.
The Premises is located at 25 HUMMOCK POND ROAD, Assessor's Map 56,
Parcel 8, Plan Book 19, Page 13, Lot 9. The properly\) zoned Residential- 2.
(V ~ (i) CUJv\ ()
Dale Waine:Chairman
THIS NOTICE IS A V AILABLE IN LARGE PRINT OR OTHER
ALTERNATIVE FORMATS. PLEASE CALL 508-228-7215 FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION.
NANTUCKET ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
1 EAST CHESTNUT STREET
NANTUCKET, MA 02554
CASE No.6 \ ~/O Co
FEE: $300.00
APPLICATION FOR RELIEF
Owner's name(s): Walter and Marilyn S. Rabetz
Mailing address: 41 Batchelder Road, Windson, Connecticut 06095
Applicant's name(s): Same
Mailing address:
Locus address: 25 Hummock Pond Road Assessor's Map/Parcel: 56/8
Land Court Plan/Plan Book & Page/Plan File No.: 19-13 Lot No.:9
Date lot acquired: 10/19176 Deed Ref.lCert. of Title: Book 155, Page 306 Zoning District: R-2
Uses on Lot - Commercial: None X Yes (describe)
Residential: Number of dwellings 1 Duplex_ Apartments_Rental Rooms
Building Date(s): All pre-date 7172?Main dwelling and garage predates 1972; Studio addition is 1986C of
O(s)? No
Building Permit Nos 3675-84
Previous Zoning Board Application Nos.: 109-86
State below or on a separate addendum specific relief sought (Special Permit, Variance, Appeal), Section of
the Zoning By-law, and supporting details, grounds for grant of relief, listing any existing nonconformities:
See Addendum attached
I certify that the information .?}t~d herein is substantially complete and true to the best of my
knowledge, under the pains ~/FI};rIties of perjury.
SIGNATURE: .' :"-l~ Applicant Attorney/AgentV
(If not owner or ow' ttorney, please enclose pro of agency to bring this atter before the Board)
;' f/l FOR B ICE USE
Application received on:.L20 I~BY: I ~ Complete: Need copies?~/7\')(/~ \
Filed with Town Clerk:ll12/~rd:---1_I_ Building Dept.:_I_I_ B~
Fee deposited with Town Treasnrer:WG7 d.a. 'J~l(I!h. Waiver reqnested?:~ Granted: _I-.J_
Hearing notice posted with Town Clerk:-LtV IUQM.ailed:LI '2-74QI&M:~/ZCedO& d-t~J:2!p
Hearing(s) held on:---1_I_ Opened on:_I_I_ Continued to:_I---1_ Withdrawn?:_I_I_
DECISION DUE BY:_I_I_ Made:_I_I_ Filed wffown Clerk:---1---1_ Mailed:_I_I_
DECISION APPEALED?: 1 1 SUPERIOR COURT: LAND COURT Form 4/03/03
ADDENDUM
Assessor's Map 56, Parcel 8
25 Hummock Pond Road
Residential-2
Deed Book 155, Page 306
Plan Book 19, Page 13
Lot 9
Applicants are seeking relief by SPECIAL PERMIT under
Nantucket Zoning By-law (the "By-law") 5139-16 (C) 1, or in the
alternative By-law 5139-16 (C)2, to validate a reduction of the
rear yard setback from ten feet to about 8.9 feet and the
easterly side yard setback from ten feet to about 7.6 feet at its
closest point. In addition, the Applicants are seeking relief by
VARIANCE under By-law 5139-16A (Intensity regulations - frontage)
to validate the Locus which has frontage of only about 28.49 feet
in a zone where minimum frontage of 75 feet is required and, to
the extent necessary, under By-law 5139-160, (Intensity
regulations - regularity) to validate the noncomplying regularity
factor.
The Locus was created in 1975, after the enactment of By-
law, by a plan endorsed by the Planning Board, presumably on the
basis that the structures on the Locus and the adj oining lot
predated the 1955 adoption of the Subdivision Control Law in
Nantucket. This subdivision, and the fact that the Locus was put
into ownership separate and distinct from all adj acent land by
the conveyance of the adjacent lot on October 14, 1975, created
what is commonly referred to as a Dale Doctrine violation.
Applicants received a building permit dated July 2, 1985 to
construct an addition consisting of an artist studio to an
existing garage. During the course of the permitting process,
Applicants were informed by the Building Inspector by letter
dated July 16, 1986 that they had to obtain zoning relief to
validate the inadequate frontage and regularity issue. By
decision dated October 3, 1986, the Zoning Board of Appeals
granted relief by Special Permit to allow the addition but, for
reasons not explained in the decision, did not grant the Variance
relief necessary to cure the so-called Dale Doctrine issue (See
BOA Decision 109-86).
Applicants constructed the addition and the deck; however,
they never obtained a final sign off or a CO for their work. In
their application, they indicated that the proposed addition
would be at least 10 feet from the rear and side yard lot line.
Unfortunately, in siting the addition, they were under the
mistaken impression that a fence on the property constituted
their lot line, and they set the addition ten feet from the
fence. Now, twenty years later, it has now been brought to their
attention that the addition is within the ten foot setback
required in the R-2 District. Although all of the zoning
nonconformi ties are now protected from enforcement due to the
passage of time, Applicants are seeking relief by Variance and
Special Permit to cure all of the nonconformi ties and validate
their lot. The Locus meets all other dimensional requirements of
the By-law, including parking, with the exception of the side
yard setback on the main house, with is a pre 1972 structure.
Applicants request that the Board grant the requested relief
as it is in harmony with the intentions and purposes of the By-
law and the minimal intrusion to the abutters is far outweighed
by the burden of removing the structure. Variance relief is
justified due to the unique circumstances relating to the soil
conditions, shape or topography of the Locus and its structures,
and especially affecting the Locus and not affecting generally
the Residential-2 zoning district. Li teral enforcement of the
By-law in this case would involve substantial hardship, financial
and otherwise, to Applicants, and the desired relief may be
granted without substantial detriment to the public good and
without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent or
purpose of the By-law. In addition, granting such relief would
be consistent with the relief granted by this Board in similar
so-called Dale Doctrine cases.
2
SCALE: 1"= 50' DATE: JANUARY 18. 2006 ~
Owner: . . . . W~TJ~ .~ f.,/.4RILYN. ~" 8Af3~l. . . . . ~#a
V'~ Po
WL)
~04L)
CURRENT ZONING CLASSIFICATION:
Residential 2 (R-2)
EXISTING:
MINIMUM LOT SIZE: 20.000 S.F.
MINIMUM FRONTAGE: 75 FT.
FRONT YARD SETBACK: 30 FT.
REAR/SIDE SETBACK: 10FT.
GROUND COVER % : 12.5%
.2.6.6.39* . $.f.
. SE:E. fL.AN. .
. $E:E. fL.AN. .
. $E;E. fL.AN. .
. $E;E. fL.AN. .
I CERTIFY. AS OF: . . ld8.-~OQ6. . . THAT
THE BUILDING(S) IS/ARE LOCATED ON THE
GROUND AS SHO~ HEREON.
~~M/J)ItJJI1itL ,/
PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR
THIS PLOT PLAN WAS PREPARED FOR THE TOWN
OF NANTUCKET BUILDING DEPARTMENT ONLY AND
SHOULD NOT BE CONSIDERED A PROPERTY LINE
SURVEY. THIS PLAN SHOULD NOT BE USED TO
ESTABLISH PROPERTY LINES. FENCES, HEDGES OR
ANY ANCILLARY STRUCTURES ON THE PREMISES.
THE PROPERTY LINES SHOM'-l RELY ON CURRENT
DEEDS AND PLANS OF RECORD.
THIS PLOT PLAN IS NOT A CERTIFICATION AS TO
TITLE OR OWNERSHIP OF THE PROPERTY SHOWN.
OWNERS OF ADJOINING PROPERTIES ARE SHOWN
ACCORDING TO CURRENT ASSESOR RECORDS.
ASSESSOR MAP: . . ~6. . , PARCEL: . E) .
BUILDING LOCATION PLAN
OF LAND IN
NANTUCKET, MASS.
Deed: . . .1 !)5.-;3Q6. . . . Plan: . . . 1.9:-1 J. . . . . . .
Locus: . . . . .#.2~ .H.UMMOCK. fQNP. f1QAO. . .
CHARLES W. HART cmct ASSOCIATES,
Professional Land Surveyors
49 SPARKS A VENUE
NANTUCKET, MASS. 02554
(508) 228-8910
56-7
N/F
R. & L. FEDER
Inc.
56-277
N/F
J.P. RAY
....
lC)
~ EXISTING
(Q 1 S1Y W/F
BUILDING
1.450:1: S.F.
(BLDG. CORS.)
56-9
N/F
WERNICK
i
~
;t
56-10
N/F
P.J. &: D.A. LEARY
H-6914
Certificate No.
Date Issued:
APPLICATION TO THE HISTORIC DISTRICT COMMISSION
Nantucket, Massachusetts for
CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS - STRUCTURAL WORK
An application is hereby made for issuance of a Certificate of Appropriateness under Chapter 395 Acts and Resolves of
Massachusetts, 1970 proposed work as described below. and on plans, drawings and photographs accompanying this appli-
cation. This is a contractual agreement. Fill out in ink.
TAX MAP NO.
PARCEL NO.
'i
"
OWNER OF RECORD:
/./
DATE:
HOME ADDRESS:
"'1.
i "
,J t."
'. I
. ZIP: .. /
, ~. i
f, ;i.
TEL. NO.: :'~-.e-.
ADDRESS OF PROPOSED WORK:
c"- ,-,..,--
NAME AND ADDRESS OF AGENT:
ZIP:
TEL. NO.:
All drawings submitted must be of ,f" scale and will be retained by this office.
DESCRIPTION
OF WORK
DWELLING ADDITION
HISTORIC RESTORATION
GARAGE
PAVING
COMMERCIAL
STEPS FENCE
RAZING or DEMOLITION
GATE
OTHER
SI ZE OF STRUCTURE: Length
Width
Square Footage
WOOD DECK:
Size
1st Fl.
2nd FI.
DIFFERENCE BETWEEN EXISTING GRADE AND FINISH GRADE:
HEIGHT OF RIDGE ABOVE FINISH GRADE: N.
S.
E.
W.
DET AIL 1. Foundation: Height Exposed
Con. Blk.
Blk. parged
Brick type
2. Chimney:
Block parged
Brick Type
~
Ln
N
:z
=>
-,
(Flat Only) Type Size
i
;
110' rt r ~
".iu'
1'---"
I~I
,c:=Jj
~~D/I
@
I
n~"nf
L~~-''..!i____.
ood Garage Doors Wood Louvers
..,.' I
.~: :..
oof Pitch:
Dormer Pitch
Other
oofing Material: Asphalt
Wood
Other
. ,., - .'
AP'MIt ~ it). mlf'l!} I)
J' -".,..,
. ,'.f - t" .
. I a\ (;1 :'J
,-,.,' r-r-~-
{:
,
"
7. Leader Material
Size
./-': ,: {. -
8. Gutter Material
Size
9.
: __;=:.; 10.
11.
Fascia Size Soffit Overhang You are RA!wtindad,i:t~wt no W01llornerboard Size
Sidewall: White Cedar Shingles dM~oa4i/fer from J'()(Nhetil~d
specifications without pr KIt,
Window style: Double hung Crankout J1.f1Ilroval of duntGe9mmission. Snap-in Grills ,---.
12. Door type: Front
Rear
Other
Material
COLOR
Sidewall
Roo fin!!
Doors
Trim
Foundation
Fence
Sash
Shutters
Deck
Received by HDC office
)j,~ '
SIGtjATUREOF OWNER OF RECORD
VALID FOR 12 MONTHS FROM DATE OF ISSUANCE. MAY BE RENEWED. NO STRUCTURE MAY DIFFER FROM THE APPROVED
APPLICATION.
APPROVED
DISAPPROVED
e'halrman
(/
COMMENTS:
LAND OF":
IV! A '( I q.
CHARL.ES F.
rQ7S -SeAl-E:.
" ,
I", So
DAVIS
..) 0 SIA H S. BA R~ E. IT, Su~ve:.""'oR..
i" R <t:E.1
5
M \ \,... \( . 5':' E
e.e.,~~ 8,-0 ~~D 0
~. , 8 ~
tD'1-'oo' ;. g '. 0 ~
'.; ,I, A It'-A 17 a ::J.. OIl Q
~ S.r. ~
s.~".- $79" oS"7"t: ..
I '3 B, 47 . . rt
leU S. M. "
I:
-5U13DIVI5'o~ OF"
LOT 1 - PLAN
DATE D JUNE 1S:1'i7S'
;-- -____~~O OF" CI-IA~I.ES F.
:=-~,~l f' ~ I'> l.il#
IfrlnJ c:! o. ~
i e ~l:l.;:"
; I(D) ~ a ~ ~ :> I--f u
!'~ I:) 5' ~" - ^1Jv.o
N iUlI1} ,- ::l _ ~ - PI C I(
c..n r-J .... Co ". -0 ~o
c::~) i'y ~ [ ~ No
~ pp it~~ ~DER. THE SU6DIVISION ~04D
CON, ~ ~ NO,. R.E:.QOIR..EO
-.~--.-~
t' A TI:~-.f E a::::J r= I L. E No.
N :l;;-rufK "11L.A'N!" I NG 13 OAR~k'" 1,7S
~r--~ul
\n
~
I:r
~
In
>
<{
o
III \0
\... ~
- ~
9
l&.
\tI
t.cJ
J
Q!
((
I
\J
011
~
A ~fA
::Uo to 3 B
s,~
o
-
<
..vG;".
, 0., I
:Jt;,.63'fI. ~/z..
ae.
('.G.
*
oj.
...
...
~ .~
.
f""
If)
I-
o
.J
...
o
.
It)
~
"
>-
Q
<{
lk'
~
<{
141 O!
00. <(
~ 0 ..J
Ooj- 'J
1"\
... .
C"-
o
. (')
('/
... I-
~ 0
-J
>-
Q
((
~
\!>
...
~
q-
it'
~
-J
V
:f-
t-
o
-J
I~,~s ~ st.:',
u :~r~1 .;;:;1, i
~
h!CEI\.~.J \"J:,ri., -;'....,:q'l
1-L!\N;lJCf'~~-i cr,:..:rn I ~.. ~ ' i:[JG~ UF
~. / I'L F !
l
i..-1--t~::.-.k'
,
BUILDING INSPECl~OR
r-/
-:) t.
r
-~ ),-/
"
TOWN BUILDING ANNEX
2 EAST CHESTNUT STREET
NANTUCKET, MASSACHUSETTS 02554
Telephone 228-0588
July 16, 1986
Walter and Marilyn Rabetz
41 Batcheldor Road
Windsor, CT 06095
Dear Mr. and Mrs. Rabetz:
The enclosed permit is issued contingent on your applying to the Zoning
Board of Appeals of Nantucket, to correct the zoning violation that
~xists against your property: to wit, subdiyision of your lot without
benefit of a variance for inadequate frontage.
Yours truly,
e-~(~~~a;;:.~,
Elbert C. Ulshoefter?;~.
Building Commissioner
ELC/vtp
ENCL:
n
"'
'"
...
:;
n
.
...
"'
o
"II
o
n
n
c
~
Z
n
-<
Z
P
....
:z:
-
en
n
:s:-
:::u
C='
SI:
c
en
....
D1
1'1'1
C='
-
fn
."
5
1'1'1
C='
-
Z
3=1
n
o
z
en
..
c
.r:
c
Z
Q
Z
en
"V
m
n
...
o
'"
~:Z::-I
m~:Z::
....",-
-< '"
..,Z..,
,,01'11
~-I"
nn~
:::!O-l
n~",
~~:J:
mm~
""Z""
!'In""
I'IIm
Om
on
,,0
~
c;;m
ZZ
~~
..,!:
"0
00\
n
:~
co
-z
Z-I
Ii) X
n'"
0""
Z"
-fO
z~
e:-I
Ox
e:m
'"
""0
-<~
-f-l
om
n~
0_
~'"
.,,'"
....e:
i'lli'll
-f_
-""
o
Z-I
X
~I'II
"'~
""0
~"
,,~
~."
"'I'll
""
m~
~-
~~
zm
.0
.o~
Sn
"m
m"
0-1
-
- "II
~n
.,,~
nm -I
m
:::!o
0""
~o
xn
~n
<~
m~
mZ
mn
z-<
"'~
Si=
z....
mm
Om
~-
z~
oe:
m
00
~e:
I'll ."
00
mZ
-<"
-fm
x-f
1'IIe:
~"
."z
"'0
~""
.,,-f
":Z::
--
~'"
-I .
I'll'"
I'll
-"
~~
.,,-
m-f
no
dZ
~!(
~
""
-I
m
"
~
....
....
"
I'll
.
-1on";~-1
:z:: " ~ ~ ~;: :J:
m 2 ::!-< '" in
0.... Z 0 ;:; ~ ."
~ziii!' m
~~OO~ ~
OClZ-I t' =i
"II:J: ~
"II"i=~ ! ~ n
Z~I'II-I ~ ~
~~-....~ -f
Z-fZx: =Ii
....Z-II'II ~ Iii
~ Ii) :J:." ! '"
~-fl'll~~-I
~o~~ ~~....
-I-Z-
:J:"" ~ :
1'115!~ ~! r-
n Z R,..-.. ~C--
o Ii) I'll i-4..... lS:-
Z 0'" r--. p _
'" I'll -I.... .
-f."z ~ :
~~Ii)~ . ~
g~~6 ~Z
01'11- n
Z Z '" ~ ':.~
.. ......, .... - 1 1
~~~a ~~ ~
~Z~ : ....,
Z---o :
""-f Z l
-fd", ~
z-f~ ~ 1t. 1"
~~~ ~~ b----a
f;l ill ::: V\ ~ .....
~ ~ ~ B::.~t -:l ...
- 0 ~ r-- .".
ZZ '"
'" '" -f ~. i:
;:oo~ ! i
n "" -f : i
-I-I:J: ~ ! :
-I'II~' .
Ox. l .-.l
Z I'll -f ~ : , !-
'" I'll ':Z:: l
o-f"~ ~ .
"II ~ ~ ~ '"
-f '" ~~
~~~ lbtJ= ;.
i=CI-f 1 ~
o if"'IlI..-
_~x ~ '"
Zzm ~ ~
Ii) 0 ~ i" 0
'" .,,:~ Z
-f.,,:
- :Z::'" . ....
ZI'II,! 0
~
m
c
z
p
.
W
~
N
~
! .
fE.m
c
-
r-
ac:
- _ 8
Z :z I
C)
~J
a z ~
1'1:z:-
-a z !
~ ~ i
::a n ~
-I =-= a
iI:~
1'1
Z
-I
o
~
~
,,",,-
~
~
Q
~
;:.
~
t=
=
,,",,-
~
~
"""-
=
CJQ
gc
00
~
~
~
""""
Q
"1
"II
m
i"--
l~
i~
ID
f
l..'
6
'.
VI
."
~
c:
...
-
~
...-
..:1
.
~'.'
",
~f""'.-r
.~.
.. )qJ~,
-0\
tJ ; ~! <, ~
.~.
- .
~i ~
~
f ! r I i I -...- I -.-
i ! ! I I f
! l ! i 1 j""i
i -I r !
! i
: i ! I
1 I r 1 :
i "- J . 'J
'"
.-
.-
f 1 ,
i : l 1 !
l- f :.
- 'i 1
~ .
I
':
~i
1
.--,"-~
r
f
:
,.
~
-.,
1 ! I ! ' -- ,,'
~1 ! ,r ' :
i --J '. -: -1
'. J J- j ~ i
.
. l f
i- i
. . ..
. i i
1" 0 .
"7: . '1 t'
.
,~ . 1-
..
. .
'f .
- " J
i- i of
.1 r '. f
I -i. . i I
.
. /
.Ill.
. -
."
. -. .0-
:1-. c-
a..em ."
... - -::;-
.!.--
-! '
...
i.'
,. --',
'l
,~
,I
1
i
J :. ~
:r
f
t
f ~-
-i
l'
f
1
i
i
:
i
i
: i
!'-
: .
i
_I .
1
r
:
1
i
. '-1-,
~F
"j
/ -.
. ,
"
w
.
~.
';" ,
....
...
::I
...-
..~-
, "....',
"
0:,
~
.-~,~
t.
;:L
.:.:-:
" fC--;',
(:,;
f
:/
i
-f
. 1
/:
1-
,.",
I.
f
<I
l
,I
:
.!-.
..
i-
t
t~
r
.r., _
i -,~
i
i
I
r
-..,.
.#'
- .-t.
.1
:1
'J 4>
-i
l'
i'
1.
'.
:
!
/1
:-.1.
'-"'1
>1
I
f'
F
--f ..
i-
i
i
'1
j
I
-t
r'
,(
r.
J.
I
i
-I,
i
i
t
- .
-~l
i
,
~-
..
- !
i
:
l'
-[/
i
i
r
"
-4 --1
I
\I
~
~...-....a~~...y.t'l!.,..r...~,-...::....~....:,'.~~:.......-;.o,.;.,'.~~...r...::~;~;,.~,,_....l'(._l~~~~""-
.,.......
,. ,
.
- ----
6~C~ 277 f':jr 280 .
.
. .
IOAID or APPEALS'
TOWlI or IlAITUCUT
IWn'UCltET, HASSACHUSETTS 02"~
.... ;
DICISIO.h
the IOMD or.ArPIALS, at a rubUc ....rl... held on 1'UISDAY,
octOBD 7, 1916 at hio p... in the Town. and County lulldlnl, 'an-
tucket, .... thefollov1aa Decldon upon the Application of MAlILYI AID
VALTa IABErZ (109-86) eddr... 41 B.tchelder'lo.d, Vlnd.or, CT 0609S..
--.
1. Applicant. .e.k a SPECIAL PERMIT under Zonin. Cod~SECTIO"
139-33A or . VAlIAlCE Under SECTION 139-32 for pr..l... Whlch are non-
confoc.1aa a. to frontage (28.5 feet, not 75 f.et) aad a. to regularity'
fo~la. Applicantiwould alt.r and .xt.nd an .cc...ory building, vith-
out further or lncr....d &onlng non-conformity, to proyld.. an .rti.t'.
~-, .tudlo .bed to a=o-..I.te their work. 'nIe pre.h.. are loc.ted at 25
HUHHOCl POID lOAD, A.....or', Parc.l 56-8, Lot 9 of Plan 19 at P.g. 13,
.nd In the IESIDERTIAL-2 soning di.trict.
,
c
i-i'
:j
l
I:
2. Our findin.. ar. ba.ed upon the Appllcatlon papar., core..-
pond.ace .nd t..tllDony at our headng. It appe.n that Applicant.' tot .
9 va. or1.iully part of a parc.l of land own.d by Mr.. Clara McGrady.
. .
In 197' Charl.. r. Davi., purcha..r of that parcel of land, .ubdiylded
It into lot. varlou.ly lacking adequate .r.. and fronta.. to meet than
soninl requir...nta. 'nI... .hortcOllllns, vera noted on th.Plan by
l...nd of the Plannlns Board at the time of it. 1975 endor.ement "Appro-
val Mot Required". Subs.quently, the requir...nts of present Section'
139-16D vera .nacted, cau.ing the premi.es to be .dditionally non-con-
fo~ins and "pra-.xist~.~vith re.pect to r.gularity f.ctor.
.'
."l'll
. -.'
--.." \
3. Appl+c.nt. h.ye begun interior r.noyation of the garas. on
the preml... to provide them.ely.. vith .n Arti.t'. .tudio. 'nI.y .tat.
that they now wi.h to .lter and .xtend th.t building vithout furth.r or
incr....d soniag non-conformity; ..g., .. to .etback., ground coy.r or
u... Accordingly, .to the .xtent they vill b.' c.rrying on a "cu.tomary
'h~ occupation" per Section 139-7A(4),they vlll nec....rily .tay vlthin
t
I~ ...
i
.
I .-.....
~ .
I
" .
l
\ .
'.i .tj"''lJ. 11
h..4...._ v ~- r
..
-.
....,-..'..,..~:. ........;::.. '","';"":~ ~"..;.t'~-'.'.i"'''':'. ;'t, , ,,.......-';_...,~~.,,.-.:.'.I.h\......'.... ..~,..:~"...I;'~'.:.U:"'_--..,"~_.~ I1IV r ....A.\--
!!
f
t.
'f
~
..,
;
,.
.,
!
~
t
;
"
u
:1.~,..-:- (109..16)
/.:: ,.
;J."_...
I.! .
a.
. '. .
8~
277 1'aGE281
-2- .
ita bouad. daUned in Section 139-2. witb uaa penaU f~OIItba &u1ldine
In.peGtor.
_.
4. 'rid,. ...U 10' x 10' addition to tba bu1ldioa (vitb dack) baa
nalshborbood appcoval indicated by 9/25/86 lattar of .obert Fedar and
ta.t1ll0ny of. Hu. McCrady. Tha Plannine ~ceI'. ~ecoMeDdatMn va.. fa".
oubla. Tha lot. of .28.638 sr. b abova tbe 20.000 SF alnta.. and
.pacinS. a~a .-pla.
5. Ve fiad tbat the pnpo.eci .1tal'at~OD and axtaadon "Ul not be
8ub.uatt8U," aora dat~iIIaatal to tbe nei&bbochoocl but 1D baftlOll' witb
..:..:-. ,c, tha lnt...t .8aCt puzopo.a of tbe sonloa. cbapta~'i;)' ,.' ,-
I
!
6. Aceocellncly. by UlWUMOUS vota. thi.loa~~. C:IAITS to Applicdt.
the requa.ted.SPECIAL PUHtt'. UDCIa~. SEC'l'lOR 139-33A.' . . (but denla...
tbe alternaUVe caq....t fo~, caUafo by VadaDce fo~~ lack of caquldta
flacllnsa).
_.
r.;l.;~J(;t~;1 CO~N1V
Rcc;ei~:.;.i ;;::d t.~tilred
. ~~N.~. 8 19.87 . CJ : It. A~ H. '
Dat'&d, DcC....<<'3. 1986 ~h'1~k #~. -~".. '-
".ntucket teA 02554 t-ttcat_..'1'~
.. -~~
\?......:.u-~ (...(~ll'ltl. ~\L\"'r.-/ . /? L,
........,~~~ ~ .~~ . l...:U~~
~~ ; - ","VUU_ I. Shaman -
ICSIlFYIHAT2II1JA'/SHMElN'SED MTBllH(ll!ClSIllII
IlASfUD.HOfflCEOFHTOWNCWlIl.AHDIHAT
NONftM.~IlEEIIFUD.I'BlSUoVIt2:2l.AW$
4J" rB:fOf1t~tJ.. ~~?~:{l-.'
, ~lUMI_,....,". . .
~. . " ::~/-::' <. '. ,:.."....... .'".,
~ HI91'7:'or,'" '..~"'.'
:.;J~t~~t~~~r '
.i:..-:.7t.~It~
. -"
I
. i
-.
~ i
. I
,"
I
I
4,
&' / tJ {)
Town of Nantucket
BOARD RECEIVED'
OF ASSESSORS
JAN 1 9 2006
p.JJu.!E~ OF
, '''''"4' uCKEr.
( .MA
ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
.,
r'
LIST'OF PARTIES 'IN INTEREST IN THE MA TIER OF THE PETITION OF'
. .
PROPERTYovmER:...'NQJ.;:ta.Q..X\&...\Y.lo,xj.\~....R.~ , '
MAILING ADDRESS....:4. 1: ..B.~cb!.:. ../RJ....... .W,l.0,d,$,Cl(h C T ()~095
PROPERTY LOCATION......QS. ..H:v.m.mQct... JP:o.cL.8.Q.aC/....
ASSESSORS 'MAPIPARCEL.. .5J.a..J8.....................................,......
APPLICANT.,."., .~.. E" .h'~"f.B. C. ,. ,......."........,
SEE A IT ACHED PAGES
I certify that the .foregoing is a list of persons w~o are ownerS ofabutting property, owners ~f
land directl;, opposite on any public or private street or way; and abutten of the abutters and all
other land owners within 300 feet of th~ property Iirie of owner's property, all as they appear ?n
the mo~t recent applicable tax list (M.G.L. c. 40A, Section 11 Zoning Code Chapter 139.
Section 139.290 (2) , .
'~I....23~...gtp6
tZTE ." .
..I?~,f!~
ASSESSOR'S OFFICE
Town of Nantucket
, ,
,
t!l
Z
~~
01
H
..:IE-!
IZl
011><:
U
~
I.
r
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ ~ ~ 0
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
I I I I I I I I I I I I ~
~
,~ ~
., Po
~
g ~
~ I
~
~
Po
~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~
f< f< f<
tIl tIl tIl
f< f< f< f<
tIl tIl ~ ~ ~ tIl tIl
~ ~ ~ ~ t; ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
f< f< f< f<
CIl 00 Ol 00
r<
~ ~
~ ~
Po Po
<Ii
tn
ro
'"
f< f<
tIl tIl
~ ~
~ ~
~ tl
I I ~ ~
f< f<
tIl tIl
M ~ ~ M ~ N ~ ~ ~ ~ .., . . N ~ ~ ~ . M ~ ~ M ~ . . 0 ~ . .., . M
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ : ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ N NON M N N N ~ N N N ~ N N M N N N N N N N N ~ N N N N M
N 0 0 0 MOM 0 0 0 ~ 0 0 0 ~ 0 0 MOO N N N N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
t; ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ t ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
tIl tIl
:z; tIl
H ..
E-t E-c ~ E-t U E-t E-t E-t
S S Po S ~ S B E tIl
g i~~;~~~~~~
... E-t E-t E-t E-t
B S S ~ B S
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~
~ B ~ ! ! a a B BIB B B B ~
i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
'"
..
..
"
.lJ
'tl
0<
'"
d
'..
r<
...
..
:II
~
>< f< ~
M f-4 00 "It'
.. ~; ~ ~ ;l;
e ~~!i1i~
:g 0
0< Po
~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~
Po Po Po
'"
...
..
~ ~ S S f< f< ~ :
M ~ i Po A A = = f<
~ ~ t; ~ ~ tIl ~ g gEE a'~
~ =0 ~ : ~ ~ s a a ~ ~ = ~
~ ~ = i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ g
o III 0 0\ C7\
o ~ 0 III N "It' .., . M 0 ~ .
~ ~ ~ ~ M M M M H ~ ~ . M
tIl
~
f<
~
tIl f<
H tIl
> r-- III III
~ ~ ~ ~ t;
~ 0 '"" f"') P:
~ ~ ~ B
co JQ "' j:Q
o ...
I""i M 0 Ul 0 0 0 0
N N N .,. Pt P. P. Q)
f"') "'*' co 0
. t'- l"'- <7\
tIl
8 ~ ~ ~
~ I I I
o
o
'"
'"
C!>
:z;
H
:<
tI1
~
..
'"
~
~
is
H
:II
~
tIl
~
B
!;:
..
tIl
~
f<
tIl
~
f<
II:
i:1
~
i
i
o
.....
u
I ~
~ ~
~ 0<
e
~
~
..
f.l
~
0<
H
~
f<
tIl
0<
o
.....
u
..
I
~
"
~
o
.....
u
'"
..,
o
u
:II
0<
H
U
H
~ ~ ..
~ flo4 ~
Po u~ gj
'" ~
.. ..
o Cl ... H
.., '" liS'" '"
~ >< gj :0: tl ::l ~
:z; ag~[;l~~;
~ i~..,~tlPo~
1 ~~~ii~e
0< tIl
~ t:i ~
0< tI1 ~ Ii!
>< :1 i !il ~
~: ; ~"' !il~tIl
"' ~ '" ~ A ~ ~ ~ 3
.. ~ II: ~"' ~ '" II: ~ '"
'" i ~ ~ : B ~ ~ ~ tIl Iii
I : ~ ! ~ : ~ a ; I ~ Po ~
g re ~ ~ 8 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a j
~ g g ~ ~ mEa Po 0< ~ ~ ~
u
0<
'"
H
:<
A
~ ~ i
is S tIl '"
~ : ~ ~
a g tIl m
tJ H b to
H ~ S ~
> '" tIl :0:
.,
...
g
... '"
l""'i N M ..,
...
... '"
. .., ~ Ul ~ ~ 0 0 ~ ~ 00 ~ 0 N
o M N MM. ~ . . . ..,. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 M M
~ ~ M ~ rl ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ m ~ ~ ~ " ~ ~ M " N N N N N M . .
o
o
'"
......
'"'
'"
.....
r<
.,
o
~
~
~
Po
~
0:
::: ti ~ ~
~ I ~ ~
o 0\ ..,. ..,.
~ N \D Ul
.,
I
~
a
A
f<
~
I
Ii!
~
><
'"
tIl
u
~
~
'"
'"
~ ~
~ ~
"' A
&l ., '" '" ~
g gj " ~
~ g Po ~ ~ ~ ~
..:l gj "'.., ~
g ~ g ~ ~ ~ i)
~ "Hi [g l5 0 Po
tIl i! 0: 0: f< f:! 5:
~
'"
Il1
o
o
..
H
H
o
...
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ \D ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ \D \D ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ \D ~ ~
X ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Ul Ul ~ Ul Ul Ul Ul Ul Ul ~ Ul Ul Ul Ul Ul Ul Ul ~ Ul Ul Ul Ul Ul