HomeMy WebLinkAbout077-06
TOWN 'OF NANTUCKET
B'OARD OF APPEALS
NANTUCKET, MASSACHUSETTS 02554
Date:
0Y0~ r;
, 20a~
To: Parties in Interest and, others concerned with the
- '-"}5eclsIon- of the BOARD OF APPEALS in the Application of the
following:
..
Application No.:
Owner/Applicant:
()7 )-()( ()
;h~ ((12 Lc l ()(\ (Jue,('nr)
Enclosed is the Decision of the BOARD OF APPEALS which has'
this day:been/filed in the office of the Nantucket Town
Clerk.
An Appeal from this Decision may be taken pursuant to
Section 17 of Chapter 40A, Massachusetts General Laws.
~,Anx action appealing the Decision must be brought by
fiiing an complaint in court within TWENTY (20) days after
this day's date. Notice of the action with a copy of the
com~laint and certified copy of the necision must be given
to the Town Clerk so as to be received within such TWENTY
(20) days.
4rQV~~~
~~ ~ - tYel13 Chairman
cc: Town Clerk
Planning Board
~uilding CommissJoner
..
.
PLEASE NOTE: MOST SPECIAL PERMITS AND VARIANCES HAVE A TIME
LIMIT AND WILL EXPIRE IF NOT ACTED UPON ACCORDING'TO NANTUCKET
ZONING' BY-LAW 9139-301 (SPECIAL PERMITS); ~139-32I (VARIANCES)
ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE CALL THE NANTUCKET ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS.
NANTUCKET ZONING BOAIID OF APPEALS
Two Fairgrounds Road
Nantucket, Massachusetts 02554
Assessor's Map 77, Parcel 7.9
Certificate of Title No. 22005
Limited-Use-General-3
Lot 803
Land Court Plan No. 5004-50
22 Wigwam Road
DECISION:
1. At a public hearing of the Nantucket Zoning Board of
Appeals, on Friday, September 8, 2006, at 1:00 P.M., in the
Conference Room at 2 Fairgrounds Road, Nantucket, Massachusetts,
the Board made the following Decision on the application of
JANELLE LYNN OVESON, c/o Sarah F. Alger, Attorney, Two South
Water Street, Nantucket, Massachusetts 02554, File No. 077-06:
2. The Applicant is seeking relief by VARIANCE from the
provisions of Nantucket Zoning By-law (the "By-law") ~139-16A
(Intensity Regulations - ground cover) in order to validate the
existing ground cover of a single-family dwelling. The Locus
contains about 2,365 square feet of ground cover (resulting in a
ground cover ratio of about 3.26%) in a district that allows a
maximum ground cover of 2,175 square feet (3%) for this
undersized lot. The Applicant purchased the Locus with the
dwelling under construction pursuant to validly issued Building
Permit No. 904-04 (the "Permit"), which indicated that the
structure was to have a ground cover of about 1,602 square feet.
The Applicant obtained a Certificate of Appropriateness from the
Nantucket Historic District Commission ("HDC") to construct an
additional about 573 square feet of ground cover for a total of
2,175 square feet. When the project was completed and an "as-
built" surveyed plan was done, it was found that the ground cover
exceeded the allowable by about 190 square feet. The Locus is
also nonconforming as to lot size, containing about 72,522 square
feet of area in a district that requires a minimum lot size of
120,000 square feet. In all other respects the lot and structure
are conforming. Also see the Application in BOA File No. 045-06
which was withdrawn without prejudice. The Premises is located
at 22 WIGNAM ROAD, Assessor's Map 77, Parcel 7.9, Land Court Plan
No. 5504-50, Lot 803 (the "Locus"). The Locus is zoned Limited-
Use-General-3 ("LUG-3").
3. Our decision is based upon the application and
accompanying materials, and representations and testimony
received at our public hearing. The Planning Board indicated
that this matter was not of planning concern. There was no
opposition presented at the public hearing, personally, by
representati ves, or in writing. There was one letter from an
abutter in favor on file. Applicant's previous contractor was
present at the hearing and submitted a detailed letter to the
Board about the structural aspects of each side of the existing
structure and concluded that there was no reasonable way to
remove any part of the dwelling in order to make the structure
conform to ground cover.
4. The Applicant, through counsel and personal testimony,
stated that she is seeking a variance pursuant to Nantucket
zoning By-law ~139-16.A (Intensity Regulations) to validate the
total ground cover of the single-family dwelling on the Locus of
about 2,365 square feet (3.2% ground cover ratio), which is about
190 square feet more than the 2,175 (3%) square feet allowed
under current zoning in the Limited-Use-General-3 ("LUG-3")
zoning district in which the Locus is situated. The ground cover
violation was created through an inadvertent error in connection
with an addition to the dwelling. The Locus is situated in an
LUG-3 zoning district and is a pre-existing, nonconforming lot of
record, containing about 72,522 square feet in a district that
requires a minimum of 120,000 square feet. The Locus is improved
with a two-story single-family dwelling and an in-ground
residential swimming pool. with the exception of lot area and
ground cover, the Locus complies with all dimensional
requirements of the By-law, including frontage and setbacks.
5. Applicant, through counsel and personal testimony,
represented that in 2000, a predecessor in title to the Applicant
obtained Building Permit No. 686-00 to construct a single-family
dwelling with an attached garage, having a total ground cover of
about 2,131 square feet, upon the Locus. The foundation was
constructed, but the house was never completed. No as-built was
filed with the Nantucket Building Department at the time of the
foundation construction as the Building Permit was still open.
The Applicant now believes that the foundation constructed was
actually about 2,205 square feet, about 30 square feet more than
what was permitted under zoning and stated on the Building Permit
Application.
The property was sold with the existing foundation and
in 2004, the Applicant's immediate predecessor in title obtained
Building Permit No. 804-04 (the "Permit") to construct a single-
family dwelling on the existing foundation. According to the
first page of the Permit application, this dwelling was to have a
ground cover of about 1,602 square feet. In other words, the
proposed house was about 600 square feet smaller than the
actually existing foundation. As a result, when the house was
constructed, a large area of the unused foundation was covered by
exterior decking. Construction on this dwelling was never
completed, and no as-built plan was filed with the Nantucket
Building Department showing the construction to this point and
the Permit was again left open.
In 2005, Applicant purchased the Locus, with the
dwelling still under construction. The existing Permit was re-
assigned to the Applicant, and she took over the construction as
general contractor. Although the Applicant was represented by an
attorney and retained the services of an architect, she did not
have a survey of the Locus and the dwelling under construction
prepared at the time of the purchase. Instead,
professionals relied upon the records in good
Building Department and assumed that the house was
accordance with the Permit with a maximum ground
1,602 square feet.
she and her
fai th in the
being built in
cover of about
Using the figure of 1,602 square feet, the Applicant
and her professionals calculated that there was about 572 square
feet of available ground cover. They designed an addition to the
existing dwelling using this available ground cover figure of 572
square feet based largely upon the remaining unused portion of
the foundation that had been decked over. This addition also
included adding a second story to the existing dwelling under
construction, but this additional story is not at issue in this
case. The revised design was approved by the HDC, and the
Applicant's builder proceeded to complete the construction in
accordance with this approval.
Unfortunately, due to inexperience, the Applicant did
not seek to amend the existing Permit to incorporate the new
construction. Once the work was complete, the Applicant's
builder went about obtaining a Certificate of Occupancy. At this
point, the need to amend the Permit was discovered, and the
Applicant had an as-built prepared. The first surveyor who
prepared the as-built made a number of errors, including assuming
that an interior chimney did not need to be included in the
ground cover calculation. This as-built was subsequently
rejected by the Zoning Enforcement Officer.
The Applicant then retained a second surveyor and had a
new as-built prepared. This as-built "Building Location Plan",
dated May 9, 2006, done by Jeffrey L. Blackwell, licensed land
surveyor, a reduced copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit
A, revealed that the dwelling, as constructed by the Applicant's
predecessor in title, had an actual ground cover of 1,793 square
feet, rather than the 1,602 square feet set forth in the Building
Permi t Application, which was the figure relied upon by the
Applicant and her professionals. As a result of this inadvertent
error, the dwelling as constructed by the Applicant exceeds the
permitted ground cover of 2,175 by about 190 square feet, the
difference between the 1,602 square feet permitted under Building
Permit 804-04 and the 1,793 square feet actually constructed by
the Applicant's predecessor.
Upon discovering the error, the Applicant attempted to
cure the issue by either (a) acquiring additional land from the
one abutter who is in a position to convey additional land to the
Applicant, or (b) reducing the ground cover by eliminating
existing portions of the structure. The Applicant's negotiations
with the abutter came to naught, and as set forth in the attached
letter from the Applicant's builder, the construction of the
structure makes modification to reduce the existing ground cover
extremely difficult, rendering this option not viable.
6. Applicant, through counsel and personal testimony,
stated that unlike many other situations, the Applicant in this
case acted in good faith and unintentionally exceeded the maximum
total ground cover allowed under the By-law and made every effort
to abide by the statements made in the Permit. The Applicant has
tried to find a cure for this ground cover issue by doing a
detailed survey of the structure in an effort to identify a
portion of the structure that could be modified or eliminated and
by investigating the possibility of acquiring additional land to
cure the deficiency. Unfortunately, as set forth in the letter
from the Applicant's builder submitted to the Board as part of
the Application, due to the size and shape of the structure no
such modifications could be made. The Applicant also presented
testimony that the only abutting land available to her was
offered at a price that she could not possibly afford and that
would cause significant financial hardship.
7. Therefore, based upon the particular facts of this
case, the Board of Appeals finds that owing to circumstances
relating to the unique shape of the Applicant's land and
topography of the building but not affecting generally the zoning
district in which the Locus is situated (consisting of the
undersized nature of the Locus, the size and shape of the
structure with no warts or jogs or easily removable or modifiable
areas, and the unintentional nature of the violation), a literal
enforcement of the provisions of the By-law would involve
substantial financial hardship (consisting of the lack of
marketability, the possible need to demolish a substantial
portion of the structure, and the burdensome value of any
available adjacent land) to the Applicant, and that the desired
relief may be granted without substantial detriment to the public
good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the
intent or purpose of the By-law (since the. intent of the By-law
is not to create a hardship in such cases, and this Board has
generally granted similar relief to other applicants in unique
circumstances). The Board further finds that the Applicant acted
in good faith and built in reliance upon advice from others and
the representations made by predecessors in title, which was
based upon an inadvertent error in ground cover calculation. The
excess ground cover could not readily be eliminated. The Board
also notes that the Applicant agrees to permanently waive her
ability to construct an ancillary shed having a ground cover of
121 square feet or less, usually allowed as a matter or right and
not counted towards ground cover calculations as defined in
Zoning By-law ~139-2. The Board also notes the minimal impact of
the excess ground cover of about 190 square feet due to the
location of the lot, bordered to the east by open conservation
land and in a subdivision with similarly sized structures on
large lots.
8. Accordingly, by UNANIMOUS vote, the Board of Appeals
GRANTS relief by VARIANCE from the requirements of Nantucket
Zoning By-law ~139-16.A as to ground cover ratio to validate the
Locus, as currently
conditions:
(BOA File No. 077-06)
improved,
based upon
the
following
a. The improvements on the lot are substantially as
shown upon Exhibit A with a maximum ground cover
of about 2,365 square feet;
b. Applicant has waived the right, as an exclusion
from ground cover under the definition of "Ground
Cover" in By-law ~192-2, to construct a shed
having a maximum ground cover of 121 square feet;
and
c. There shall be no further expansion of the
structure without further relief from this Board.
Dated: October ~ ' 2006
~~
Burr Tupp r --
"""r-. tlHO I
. , ,,~!'f\ ._
S(: ll\i 9- 1JO 90.
, .
CURRENT ZONING CLASSIFICATION: EXISTING:I
Limited Use General 3 (LU.G.-3)
MINIMUM LOT SIZE: 120,000 S.F.
MINIMUM FRONTAGE: 200 FT.
FRONT YARD SETBACK: 35 FT.
REAR/SIDE SETBACK: 20 FT.
GROUND COVER 70 : 3%
72,522 S.F.:f:
SEE pLAN
SEE PLAN
SEE PLAN
3.26%
77-4.1
~o
DIRT DRl\ItWA Y
~
o
fT1
\
-,;)
~
.~
'-/
__..Jl~---
::t1
a
~
b
~
~
THIS PLOT PLAN WAS PREPARED fOR THE TOWN
OF NANTUCKET BUILDING DEPARTl.IENT ONLY AND
SHOULD NOT BE CONSIDERED A PROPERTY UNE
SUR\'EY. THIS PLAN SHOUl 0 NOT Sf:: lJStDoB
ESTABUSH PROPERTY UNES. fENCES. HED OR
ANY ANCILLARY STRUCTURES ON THE PREMISES.
THE PROPERTY UNES SHOWN lID. Y ON CURRENT
DEEDS AND PLANS Of RECORD.
THIS PLOT PLAN IS NOT A CERTIFICATION. AS TO
TIllE OR OWNERSHIP OF THE PROPERTY SHOWN.
OWNERS OF ADJOINING PROPERTIES ARE SHOWN
ACCORDING TO CURRENT ASSESOR RECORDS.
~
77-Z
~
CONSUlVAlIOH
FOUHlloIIlIOH
vN:Nfr
PORCH
0.0.5:
o.o.s.
.>>.~
Jlo~
POOL
UHOER
COHSlRUCllOll
f
~f
if
f
f
77-Boa
fER~
BUILDING LOCATION PLAN
OF LAND IN
NANTUCKET, MASS.
SCALE: ,". 50' DATE:MAY 9. 2006
. JANELLE OVESON
Owner. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0 . 0 0 0 .
Cert: . . 2;299~ . . 0 Pion: :59q4.-.59. LPT . 8.0~ .
Locus: 0 . 0 . 0 .#.2~. VfI9Vf~~ .R.Of'.~. . . . . .
BLACKWELL and ASSOCIATES, Inc.
ProfessionaL Land Surueyors
20 TEASDALE CIRCLE
NANTUCKET, MASS. 02554
(508) 228-9026
~. vr--
TOWN OF NANTUCKET
ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
J 2 FAIRGROUNDS ROAD
NANTUCKET, MASSACHUSETTS 02554
PHONE 508-228-7215
FAX 508-228-7205
NOTICE
A Public Hearing of the NANTUCKET ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS will be held at
1 :00 P .M., FRIDAY, SEPTEMBER 8, 2006 in the Conference Room, at l
FAIRGROUNDS ROAD~ Nantucket, Massachusetts, with a vehicular entrance from
Old South Road and a pedestrian entrance from the front of the former Nantucket Electric
Company building, on the Application of the following:
JANELLE OVESON
BOARD OF APPEALS FILE NO. 077-06
Applicant is seeking relief by V ARIANCE pursuant to Nantucket Zoning By-law
Section 139-16A (Intensity regulations - ground cover) in order to validate the existing
ground cover of a single-family dwelling. The lot contains about 2,365 square feet of
ground cover (about 3.26% ground cover ratio) in a district that allows a maximum of
2,175 (3%) for this undersized lot. Applicant purchased the property with the house under
construction pursuant to validly issued Building Permit No. 904-04 (the "Permit"), and
which indicated that the structure was to have a ground cover of about 1,602 square feet.
Applicant amended the Permit to construct an additional about 573 square feet of ground
cover for a total of 2,175 square feet. When the project was completed and an ~'as-built"
surveyed plan was done, it was found that the ground cover exceeded the allowable by
about 190 square feet. The locus is also nonconforming as to lot size with the lot
containing about 72,522 square feet of area in a district that requires a minimum lot size
of 120,000 square feet. In all other respects the lot and structure is conforming. Also See
BOA File No. 045-06 which was withdrawn without prejudice.
The Premises is located at 22 WIGWAM ROAD, Assessor's Map 77, Parcel 7.9,
Land Court Plan 5504-50, Lot 803. The property is zoned Limited-Use-General-3.
N~~~~~V-fANc--
THIS NOTICE IS AVAILABLE IN LARGE PRINT OR OTHER
ALTERNATIVE FORMATS. PLEASE CALL 508-228-7215 FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION.
NANTUCKET ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
1 EAST CHESTNUT STREET
NANTUCKET, MA 02554
CASE NO. 07/-06
EE: $300.00
APPLICATION FOR RELIEF
lwner's name(s): Janelle Lvnn Oveson
failing address: 30 Parks Drive. Sherborn. Massachusetts 01770
.pplicant's name(s): Janelle Lvnn Oveson
ilailing address: 30 Parks Drive. Sherburn. Massachusetts 01770
JOcus address: 22 Wi2Wam Road Assessor's Map/Parcel: 77-7.9
...and Court Plan/Plan Book & Page/Plan File No.: 5004-50 Lot No.: 803
)ate lot acquired: 11/3/05 Deed Ref.lCert. of Title: 22005 Zoning District: LUG-3
.
o
u\
::0
-:~:,'
n
:')
n
r"j
.i~
..-
.;
,,)
Uses on Lot - Commercial: Nonel Yes (describe)
Residential: Number of dwellings-L Duplex_ Apartments_Rental Rooms
Building Date(s): All pre-date 7/72? ~ or C of O(s)? No.
Building Permit Nos: 686-00
Previous Zoning Board Application Nos.: 045-06 (withdrawn without prejudice)
State below or on a separate addendum specific relief sought (Special Permit, Variance, Appeal), Section of
the Zoning By-law, and supporting details, grounds for grant of relief, listing any existing nonconformities:
See Addendum attached hereto.
I certify that the information contained herein is substantially complete and true to the best of my
knowledge, under the pains and p nalties of perjury.
SIGNATURE: Applicant Attorney/Agent X
(If not owner or lea e enclose p of agency to bring this matter before the Board)
FO~ BA FICE USE , /
Application received on: ?ILL y: L~ Complete:l/ Need copies?: r---.. I \
FiledwithTownClerk:W-t- lannin Boar' 109 ePt.:-,__BY:~~
Fee deposited with Town Treasurer:_f : aiver requested?:_Granted:_/_/-
Hearing notice posted with Town Clerk: ~i}JjJiMailed: ? il::!iI6C:J.&M: Q--' 1~::Jj& 03( I dG
Hearing(s) held on:~~_ Opened on:~_/_ Continued to:_/_/_ Withdrawn?:_/_/_
DECISION DUE BY:_/_/_ Made:_/_/_ Filed wffown Clerk:_/_/_ Mailed:~~_
DECISION APPEALED?:~~_ SUPERIOR COURT: LAND COURT Form 4/03/03
ADDENDUM
(Oveson, 22 Wigwam Road, Nantucket, Massachusetts)
Applicant is seeking a variance under Nantucket Zoning By-law
(the "By-law") ~139-30.A from the ground cover requirements of
By-law ~139-16.A (Intensity Regulations) to validate total
ground cover of the main dwelling on the Locus of about 2,365
square feet, which is about 190 square feet more than the 2,175
square feet allowed under current zoning. The ground cover
violation was created through inadvertent error in connection
with an addition to the main dwelling.
In 2000, a predecessor in title to the Applicant obtained
Building Permit 686-00 to construct a single-family dwelling,
with attached garage, having ground cover of about 2,131 square
feet, upon the Locus. The foundation was constructed, but the
house was never completed. No as-built was prepared at the time
of the foundation construction. Applicant now believes that the
foundation constructed was actually about 2,205 square feet,
about 30 square feet more than what was permitted under zoning.
In 2004, Applicant'S immediate predecessor in title obtained
Building Permit 804-04 to construct a single-family dwelling on
the existing foundation. According to the permit, this dwelling
was to have ground cover of about 1,602 square feet. In other
words, the proposed house was about 600 square feet smaller than
the existing foundation. As a result, when the house was
constructed, a large area of the foundation was covered by
exterior decking. construction on this dwelling was never
completed, and no as-built plan was prepared showing the
construction to this point.
In 2005, Applicant purchased the Locus, with the house under
construction. The building permit was assigned to the Applicant
and she took over the construction as general contractor.
Although the Applicant was represented by an attorney and
retained the services of an architect, she did not have a survey
of the Locus and the dwelling under construction prepared at the
time of the purchase. Instead, she and her professionals relied
upon the records in the building department and assumed that the
house was being built in accordance with the permit with ground
cover of about 1,602 square feet.
Using the figure of 1,602 square feet, they calculated that
there was about 572 square feet of available ground cover. They
designed an addition to the existing dwelling using this
available ground cover figure of 572 square feet. This addition
also including adding a second story to the existing dwelling
under construction, but this additional story is not at issue in
this case. The revised design was approved by the Nantucket
Historic District Commission, and the Applicant'S builder
proceeded to complete the construction in accordance with this
approval.
9606-e66 (e09)
t9960 'ssvn '.L:iX:Jfl.LNVN
:i7:J~I:J :i7VaSV:i.L 06
S.Lofi,a(l.J,'nS pU:D7 1'DuO'!-SsaJo.Ld
'o'Uf 'S:i.LVI:JOSSV PU'D 77:iJdJI:JV711
, , , . . . d"';o"i y.fiM~IM . iz'f . . . . . :snoOl
'~Og' 101' Og'-'vb09 :UOld ,., i;oozz' , ::pa:)
. . , . . , , , , . . , , . . . , . , . . . , , , , 'J9UMQ
NOSaAO 311~NVr '
gOO?; '6 );v'~:31 va ,OC; =. ~ :31"1:)5
'SSVW '.L3)l:JfllNVN
NI CINV1 .10
NV'1d NOLLV:J01 DNIG1Ifla
NosnlllW
;!/N
s'a-LL
I
I
/,t:
I~
I
NOllonlUSNOO
1I30N1\
100d
00'18
'so~oa3~ ~OS3SSV 1N3~~no 01 ~Nlo~oaav
NMOHS 3~V S311~3dO~d ~NINlorov JO S~3NMO
'NMOHS ,U~3dO~d 3HL JO d'HS~3NMO ~o 31111
01 SV N0I1VOIJI1~3a v 10N SI NVld 101d SIHL
'0~003~ JO SNVld ONV S0330
1N3~~no NO )'13~ NMOHS S3Nn )'HI3dO~d 3Hl
'S3S,re~d 3HL NO S3~ruon~s ).~Vll'aNV ).NV
~O S3~03H 'S30N3J 'S3Nn ,U~3dO~d HsneV1S3
01 03sn 38 LON 0 lno~ NVld SIHl 'A3A~ns
3Nn ,U~3dO~d v 03~0ISNOO 38 lON 01nOHS
ONV ).lNO lN3ru~Vd30 ~N1011n8 13>1aruNVN JO
NMOl 3HL ~OJ 03~Vd3~d SVM NVld 101d SIHl
~
rJ
..
.!.
q
~
a
~
o
~
Z
i:t.
Cl-
\
W
9
~
'$'0'0
'S'O'O
HOllOd
---mr--
"1:.\'tr"
~.<<"
JHr.H^
NOIJ.'YONno.:l
NO\lV.-.lI3SNOO
.l)>lOl'\I.tMl
;!/N
7.-LL
~
;
'~
), VM3^1ll0 .L1I10
ONVflnl
;//N
S't-LL
%9Z'~
NVld 335
NVld 33S
NVld 33S
=F'.:fS C;Zg'U
%r : % ~3^0~ aNno~~
'1.:1 OC; :>1:)'<18135 3aI5/~V3~
'1.:1 g~ :>I~V8135 a~'v'^ 1NOH:l
'1.:1 OOZ :3~'v'lNOH:I rlMIINIr-l
'.:J'S 000'07, ~ :3ZIS 101 rlnrllNIr-l
(~-'~'n'l) r IOJeua~ esn pew.un
1:~NI1SIX3 :NOIl'v'::>1.:J15SVl::> ~NINOZ 1N3~~n::>
900Z/lZ/~ ". 8 € I =qlP~A\ dUW~qlP!ft\=dAl;)S;)ld~xdS'rdUW;)NUlUPdfUund)pmUUUfUIO~'od'ilddtqSoqj j:dUl{
pasodwo:) dew
ssew 'l<l~JnlUeN JO UMOl
~~Y:1Y qUPN rHn tiIOJ.!
<.:;p,-1,JU \l?np\i\ipUl JDJ A1!nq(l~pb
t:\ Hi SJdSfj 'E4PP
d~}IUtupn6 jlJU s:aop
MIU 'f'IUO sasod.mc! ;nu~:UJpJ
)0 UN\OJ aqJ Aq rl~unpc',Jd
SlLn uOn~~~ll.lOJUi
\; ;.;...,
. JO~PUlpJOO:) SID 1<J>\J[1jUI?N
dln LUG.!) Cllq12I!\?M' all? 1?1I2P Sill) bu:sn
uaqM p;ciJaplsuoJ <)q 1Snw lPlqtI, S)I?CliW',
jUI2)JodWI : AltiO C'l)UaJd)ClJ JO;j
.IN:H-Jn:Joa Tlf931 '<;j JON
"
'\.
\
'\
\,
\,
~.
:. 'i~~
---...~-
,,-'"
;of"
~5
1i
IlV
saD\? 99'l
5860(00)
000'568$
(oozl Loin
v55Z0 'lfW '13)t:)fU.N'lfN
1.S ~31.N3) L(
1.S}J1.
( ml'lfH)lli N3aan9 0/)
NA 10~'If) ~OZVl
a~ W'If M9IM ZZ
6'L LL
aZIS lO,
a6ed/llooB
a:>!.Jd ales
aleo ales
JaUMO
ss.uPPV
01 dOJd
:>>090Z
o
::t
'~"~
SIO qaA\ :}all:)n:}u'8,N}O UA\.oJ,
dllTAI dlQlllUU,l - ~Tf) QdM ld){~muel\T 10 UM.O T
900Z:/Z:Z/~ ... ~ t t =qlP~M. dBW1S'qlP~M. =dAldSdJd(,xdsB'dBWdNBlUPd(BUlld){~t1lUBUflUO:r odIlddB'lsoq;;: dUq
pasodwoJ dew
ssew 'l.npnweN jO UMOl
\
,
\
\
sane 99'1
58601:00J
000'568$
(OOZILO/n
vSSZO \fW '.i3)tJO.LN\fN
1.S 'tl31.N3J L(
l.S'tl1.
[ G'tl\fHJI'tl N3GGI1~ O/J
NA lO'tl\fJ ~OZ\fl
G'tl W\fM~IM ZZ
6.L LL
JaUMO
ssaJpp"
01 dOJd
F3>prqiJ\?N ;inn LUO,q
!CnpL!\\PU\ .lOJ A)!pq\?llns
aJt! "P.jPP
aq) d;.:nU2J(!f{) :lOU SdOp r~)prqlJCN
:;14 i' j'IUG s:)stH1JniJ ;Y.Hh).Hjd j
JO UMDl. ~HU_ Aq p~nnpojcl
lIOq!-?tUJOjUi
aZIS to,
a6ed/>lOo9
a::>IJd ales
a~eo ales
JO~I?U,pJOOJ SII) ~d>rmNI'N
Clq.) tUGJj 31Q12III?M.' cue I?1\2P slln BillS!)
U;JljM pc)JaplsuoJ aq 4smu tjJ!l!iV\ SW2Mn
Wl?lJOdUlI :;'luO ;:)JuaJdJ2J JO.:\
1.f\J3wn:JOO l\f93l \i l.ON
t ~.""''''''''''-I" ,/
11',\ ~Sl~ S _,:\<0/
1\1,~. \ \, \ \ \ \'-.
:.,....,1...1, \ ' \'.\
11\\\\ \ \1\
\',\ \ \ \ 1,\ \\ \
\\ \ \, \ \ \\\
i -~ \\ \ \..-~~
__,---~-r\----~\ ~~\ '\ \ \
~--r"- 1 \',' 1 I',' \ \ '
~_-~~I --r-\ \ \ \ 1\ \ j' '\ I, 'I
~_~ I ,1':':\., I ,'...---- ,',
._~_ f;) \ ) I 1:5:.,.. , , _Lr.,-----~-, ',f
: OJ \ \ ,\ L--- - ':lb I I \
'I <.~, \ L ....J.:.....-r-c.;..-..;:--..;1--l~~: 11l:ii ; \ \ " ....------
, ' f:J \, '" ,__~ ~~_~"""\ ~ I, l:::lJ ,t::J II \ l 'I \---...----------
\_~~ ~_' \ ' . \ '~" \ J I ,
\ :t...,...~~ 1\ II \ m,' \c"1iJ :" -:\~- ,I,) \ \
~j / \ I \ \ c ,.___-- I' 1
'_ ;< "1, ", 1\, I, \ _----~---\-- \ I? \ lD \ \ \ \
(. \ _---r I I t:r3, ,_'''~ "\ \'
, '. _J-----r I, D I, nei \,~ \ -'.':+, w""'", )', \
\ ".-- ~ 'I I .... \" -'~-b"~:-' \ ,\--
\ ./'~[;J '!\ '1('1:.. I~\ J.t.::-~. '--~i-!'-~-i-- 1\, \. \\ \\ ---..-------
"> / I>. .~~'1'C'.,;d \ '!
\'-, '<_ . ,\ ._, _....:;:.. , I \, I,
I ~ "r;~-' :'1q? \ \ IL 'I _-\ .'~ \ 1\
\ h J! II, \ '-~ \ -~---- - \\.'\ \
\ '> 1'\\ \ \----
, . '1. \ \
\ 'I \
\\ \ I,
\'\\ \ \
\ \',A \ ~---
~~ % \\
-~_~ W~ \ \\
----.:::-.:::::-,......~- ' \
............ .-.......... _____-------~ I
SIO qaA\ :lal{on:lu'BN JO UA\O~
dv.w ~namuu..l- ~Tc) Q~M l~){:)mue"T 10 UMOT
\j\:--
~.
I
'C
~
x:
~
r
(\\.
~
.\)
L
I:
I.
I>
I,
I
I
I
l'
.li,
I
I
I
\
'. I..........".',......................
........ .........'............
......................................................".....................:....,
'. ...... . '. -," -"- ,: , -,', ":~.
-i;f',':-,,:.};, /,":
i<\":' -.Pt
.' , .' ,~..: ,
........
, '. :', .,;>,. .', ~..' :". >,
..... '. ..... i.'~,:!..
.. . ..<.<
i; ...... .... ..' '.,;ii';5~ .f;'
~.
f\\
J'
~
\
~
<:
y
\:').
z
,I :
~ i
,
~
I
1
;j'
I
\
\
, '\
\
\
\ .,'
\ .I
\,i
: .",,--
i./
//~-~'--~~'J~" .f!
.' I
. !
'~_/'----~" i
\J'i.
,.i ,._>.....
m
T
.<
III......
..... .....................'............................................
..., .' -. " "
. , . - .
,. .- ..'.... ,.
o . . '. . .
i .
~
~
~-------_._-
11
. -~-------~---~
'h''''1
IIO"'\~
---(3)
Ho<nlm<d <d-al,,~tr:
\,
L
__"",-=,i~ "lq ()
-. - .:.;[ool;t------a N (
--{J)- - -
-w
'=~=r
I~
\~~
!
: -'W I
--I-
I
\
\ \
\,
----c@-----4
;:
/ I
/
/
Ii ,
~'lr-1
" '
->I'~ '\ '
..
~ \"
~ I
~
1
'1'
'"
>d
r;
o
3.
~
1
,
(1:1
'"
o
k
4-;
~
\J
1'l
~
:I
J\
jc-\ /LL<n~ 1\
/ It I:
{/'i ,.I~___
~,; ~("-c<-,~
,.~'..~
;!;'~1
) 'J~
"'---
To Whom It May Concern:
July 24, 2006
This letter states my profesSiOnal opinion regarding the over ground cover situation
of the property located on 22 Wigwam Road, owned by Ms. Janelle Oveson.
Specifically, this letter defines what would be involved in rebuilding or removing a
portion of the building to reduce the ground cover by 190 sq. ft.
Simply, I cannot see a viable solution for taking any section of the building off.
This is due to the fact of the way the structure had been initially constructed and
modified by two previous builders and then recently modified by us. This situation
seems to have come about through a culmination of over-sites and discrepancies
in the actual building process by the previous two owners prior to the purchase by
Ms. Oveson. The building Ms. Oveson purchased was not the building on record
at the building department, nor, which we now know, was the foundation as on file
by the owner 2 times ago. Having used previous plans to modify the house, it
became obvious near building completion that the foundation purchased by Ms.
Oveson was over ground cover, then made worse by working off of plans assumed
to be correct. Through the permitting process, albeit very late in the construction
stage, when an as-built survey was completed, it became apparent that the
foundation was, indeed, over ground cover by 190 sq. ft.. At that point we looked
into what would be involved in removing a section of the building. That is when I
concluded that de-construction of any pornon of the house would be practically
infeasible and cost prohibitive.
I have provided herein a brief analysis of what would be involved in adjusting each
fSyade:
North Elevation:
To remove the needed square footage we would need to remove or modify:
. Exterior Gable (2 stories)
. Garage slab and foundation
. Radiant Heat
. Reconfigure roof line and ceiling into central part of house
. Master Bedroom
. Master bathroom
. Air-conditioning system
. 1 st floor bedroom
. Powder Room
. 2nd floor Deck
. 1 st floor porch
. Outdoor shower
. Driveway
. Pool fencing and gate
. landscaping
East Elevation:
Must like the northern elevation, the portion of the east elevation would entail:
. Fireplaces and chimney foundations (2)
. Septic lines
. Exterior Gable (2 stories)
. Garage slab and foundation
. Radiant Heat
. Reconfigure roof line and ceiling into central part of house
. Master Bedroom
. Master bathroom
. Air-conditioning system
. 1st floor bedroom
. Powder Room
. 2nd floor Deck
. 1 lit floor porch
. Outdoor shower
. Driveway
. Pool fencing and gate
West Elevation:
. Basement and poured foundation
. Plumbing mechanica&&
. Refit boiler and HV AC units
. New foundation wall
. Remove 2 bedrooms
. Remove 1 bathroom
. Modify leftover space currently used as 2 bedrooms and a bath
. Open 2nd floor kitchen, dining, loft, roofwalk.
. Address major structural beam that carries roof
. New porch system
South Elevation:
This would appear to be the most economical way to address the problem,
however the way that the house has been rebuilt three times this section is now a
structurally complex part of the building. To address:
. Reconfigure fireplaces
. Roof system carried on interior wall
. Basement poured foundation I concrete watf
. Bulkhead basement access
. Pool mechanicals
. 4 condensers
. Electrical panels
. Remove the shower
. Reconfigure the plumbing for the septic
. Remove bedroom
. Remove bathroom
. Gable end
My rough estimate of costs to reconfigure the complex and integrated design of 22
Wigwam would be $225,000 +/- $50.000.
If you need any information, please call me on 508 685 1775
Kind regards,
Christopher Skehel
CEATlF1CATENO: '-l~011J ' OATEISSUEO:~
~IC8tiOnIOC~~~:r~I~~~.;g;;~E~' fora C{ \~ O~
for structural work.
All bi8nkS must be flIted In U$Ing SLUE OR 6lAOK lNt< (110 pencil) C1t merk6dNlA.
IOTE: It It strongly recommenc:l.ct that the Applicant be famllle, wlth the HOC guldelln.., SuI/ding WIth Nantuc/cet In MInd, prior to lubmlttel of application.
PI4SS9 sae other II de for eubmltlell'llllulramentll. Incomplete eppl\CIUO", will not be reviewed by the HOC.
1Ils II e contractual agreement and mUlt be filled out in Ink, M ~ Is herebY mads fo!' ~ 01 a CertifiCIItI of I\ppropriaten88ll under Chapter 395 of tl\e Acts and
leSOlVes of Mass" 1970. lor plopoBed work as described herein and on plans. Clraw1ngs and photDgraphs accompanying tl\lS application and made a part hereof by reference.
lie certificate is valid lor thre9 years from date of Issuance. No t\J'U(l\Ute may differ from the apptoIIed application. ViOlllllon may impecte issuance of Certffica1e of occupancy,
r\;
TAX MAP N": -=l-":l- PARCEL NO, ...., . q
Street & Numbelol Proposed Work: 2'2. v,J\(.,\lJAM RoAb
owner of record: ~6 J e. l:N P--~
MaMlngAddfess: ."", 'P~~ nl'Z.I"E.
':;~E.e>UlZ-lJE; ,HA
TelephOne: '1...29-.- '7.u...LL(on Island) - (ofOlland)
AGENT ~"'i-C ,MAnoN (If applicable)
Name: ~J If) W \ I..'-'M , .Nl..CJ+i~ ,ItoK.-
'~RIng Addfess:_ ~~;L~ ~~
,
Telephone: ~(onISIar1ll) -
'PROPERTY DESCRIPTION
FOR OF"'fE USE ON!. y
Dale appHoaton ~ ~ 17 (r I c:; Fee Pllid: $ ~
......_M.. ~ 11"/ -vtli>S. .-
~~\~~(~~~c~v
:J New OweRI!1g ~on :: Garage
o Color Ch8nge 0 FeMe :: Gate
o Other (p1- apeclfy)
Slze of Structure or AddltIon: l.engtl" u.~oz,'V Sq. Footllg& 1st floOr. 1511,. ~ DeckS:
Wld1h: lIP"...', Sq.footage 2nd~:kO~+I31~e'
~ l'~ "t- Sq. footage 3rt! ftoor: t.J ^ -
OlffartlOCl be\W88I1 exls1lng grade and propoeed f1ntsl1 grade: Nortl1 '" c... r South ~~ East '" €- west N €-
Height 01 rtdge abOVe final finish grade: NOl1II .z.~ '..." " Soutl\ ~~ -<00> .. East 'l- "l '...G.. j< West '2.1 \..c" M
aMffinnAlAemark$ . REVISI~ 1'EastEleva\lOll~et-'. ~ e",-\Sl1t030 S~O ft..
HltltoriC Name: (describe) 2. South EIeYaIlon f\..^t'J
Origlnal Date: CoN '3TfWc..r ~ ON
3,WestEJevalion E1QSoTINc"" FOV""O~110N
OrIgInal Builder: 4. North Bevation c.oloJS]1'Wc-T ~ 51 M .
_ "".. '~ ~\'Z-lCJZ- p..f>t'(I.oI'A:'\-
111here an HOC survey form for thll building? W Yes CJloNO '<;loud on drawingS and submil photographS of e ., elevations.
,I DETAIL OF WORK TO BE PERFORMED
Foundation: Height Expo8Ild .1.1" I'L ::: Block C Block Parged 08rk:i< (type) /&:Poured Concrele 'J Pie1'S
Maaonry Chimney: 0 Block Parged ~ (type);ee'\) COMMO t-.L Ci Other
RoofP~oh: Main Maas.-ts;u12_Secondary Mees---'12_ Dormer ---"2_ Other
Roofing ma1erial: ~a1t Manufaelllftl( \ ~ F'.LIL'- ~t\ f-rea-ua.AL. IFence.: HeiltlI:1
:: Flberglaas Menuf8e\Ul8f Lengll1:
C Wood !Type: Red Cedar, Whlte Cedar, $hakes. etc.) _'" Type:
Skylights (flat only): Manufacturer Model No, Size Location
Manufacturer Model No. Size Location
..utters: C Wood (type) ! Aluminum I' Copper
..slIderS (material and Ilze):
Sidewall: '8. WMe cedar shingles ,= ClapbOard (exposure: tu f\; inches) Front only
C Other
Trim: Lumber type :] Pine :: Redwood ~Cedar ...., Other
Treatment ~Palnt C Staln-8olkl :: Natural 10 w88lhel 0 Clear oil flri8h
DimensIonS: Faacle 11-\ e Rake I1-'l E: SoffIt (Overhang) l1-\E. Comer bollrds ~t
Frie%At :J'"t"\E. WIndow Casing ~ Door F"""e Posts: Round .it!- Square -
. Windows: ~Ooubte Hung :l Casement:] All Wood ~ _ /!or; '" D eTl-Sa-..)
C True Olvlcled Ughl8(muntlns) "SOL'S (Simulated 0Mded Ughts)
. Doors (type end materl8l): Front E'lG\S-r Rear \5 LI. ~ Side "\ l-IbH-T
Garage ooor(s): Type LV ~'\OH e.~ Matel1aI \fJ OOh
\.&nd&cape ma1erials: OrIveways- Walkways ~ eo;;.,oN~ Wella IJ A
, ,Note: Complete door and windOW sehadule& are required.
(off island)
COLORS
Clapboeld (ff applieallle) ~ fit
8a8h W ~ lTI::
Foundation eo. tle'1
::.~ ~
Fence "-l r\ Shutters
Sidewall tJ~
= ~~ML
. Al\aCh manulacture(e colot' eamplel.
t heleby authoriZe the agent named aboV8 to aeI on my behalf to make chang" In the apeciIlCaIion& or !he plans contained in \hI$ applical\Oll in order 10 bring lI1e
eppllCIIlOn Into compliance with lI1e HOC guldelln88. I he~ agree 10 ablde by and with lI1e I and condltlons CIf this application. I hereby agree thaI "a
submlulon of ftrIY to this appIioation wllllnitlale I new alxty-day review
...,/\
AUG f 7 ''ntlt.
RECEIVED Luu-r
APPLICATION WIUl'MtWfM<('r
DEEMED COMPL~D ·
REVIEWED BY BUILDING EPT
INSPECTOR
· I &..... l",..d::: f
. ~ECE'VED
AUG 1 3 2004
~
c
9 ~\.f-~. 'f
J
~
APPUCAnOHFOR
PLAN EXAMINATION AND
BUILDING PERMIT
IMpORTANT - AppIIc8nt to ..o.,~ .. ..... In ~ 1.u.... Mdl
1.
LOCATION
OF
BUILDING
OWNERS NAME:
LaSt Firat Middle Initial
'1-1_ Lt)\ blU,a..u1
No. Street Village 11
Atl1l8I8Of'a Map No. --L! AIIeMOf'8 Percel No.
2. TYPE AND COST OF BUILDING - AI ",,1IantlJ i:ompI... PartS A-D
At TYPE OF IMPROVEMENT
sa New Building
o Addition (If residential. enter number
of new housing units added.
if any. in P.n D. 13)
o Alteration (See 2 abOve)
o Repelr. replacement
(DemOlItion (If multifamily reeldentlal.
enter number of units In
building In Part D. 13)
D Moving (relocation)
o Foundation only
B(OWNERSHIP
151 Prlvale (Individual. corporation.
nonprofit In.mutton. etC.)
D Public (Feclet'Bt. State. or lOea!
government)
Ie. eoST
Cost of: a. Structure
b. Electrical
c. Plumbing
d. Heating
e. Other
TOTAL COST OF IMPROVEMENT
BUIl.DING INSPECTOR'S EST1MATE
1.'1
D. PROPOSED USE - (For .'[)emOIItton- most recent Ull8)
R8lIldentlal DeI8I scope of work b>/ floOr & provide !he
"One FIllYlIIy square footage.
o Two or more family - Enter
number of untiI8
o Tranalent Hotel. Motel or
dOrmitory: Dr fNTawAl
OWNERSt-UP - enter number of units
OQarage
o Carport
o Other - SpecIfy
~tk) I ;'TbP'J ~U,t~6
b~ ~il;-rU}" frJW.
~YJ \ ~ fl,J. ~ltJb
r
I
\
I
i
I
omltcents
E. DIMENSIONS
DtmeneiOnl (New) of
Dwelling or Addition:
No. of Stories: \
Rret Roar Ar8IC ~ Sf
Second FloOr Area: -
-
Third Floor ArM:
Total Roar Area: ~ ~f
Full Cellar ATIlII: \Ii'" S'f
Dlm8flIlol'Ia of .
Additionlll Structure8:
Garage:
~BIdg. -
SWImming Pool: -
Other.
For new buildings and eddItIons. comP.lel8 Parts EoN .
for DemoHtlon. com on! Part 1.. for all otherS eldp to 4.
H. TYPE OF SEWAGE DISPOSAL K. ACCESSORY HEAT SOURCE .. t" J 1\
o Public or private company NO, of fireplllC88 ~
ill PrIvate (leptic tank. etc.) :: : :: :::
Solar Collector
Other:
3. SELECTED CHARACTERISTICS OF BUILDING
F, PRINCIPLE TYPE OF FRAME
D M880nry (wall bearing)
J WOOd frame
o Structural steel
o Reinforced concrete
o Other - Specify
G, PRINCIPLE TVPE OF HEATING
!JGas
DOil
D Electricity
DCaal
o Other - Specify
I. TYPE OF WATER SUPPLY
o PublIC or private company
~ Private (well. cl8t8m)
L. SMOKE DETECTORS
NO. of 0ecteCt0rI AS 9~(l.. HA~<;
Type (Bat1erY or AC) ( J)t{)r;i
See Plan for Location
J. SPECIAL CHARACTERISTICS
o AIr Conditioning
o HMt Pump
o Central Vacuum
o Other
M. RESIDENTIAL BU"-DlNGS ONLY ?
Numb<< of BedJOOlllS
Number of BathfoOlM
Full .!1- PartIal
KlIA
3. ContInUed
N. ENERGY CONSERVATION Type
Foun,datlon or FloOr Insulation ~
Walllnaulatlon ~
Ceiling or Roof Insulation
Window Glazing; Insutlited Gt...
J
~nya
li)B
Double Glus ~.
Wealherstripped: Ves
I
~I Jl::.
rrm No
. (Do not fill in if'" of window to wall area is less than 2lJ4lb)
O. STRUCTURAL CHARACTERISTICS OF BUILDfNG
Applicant Is RlqUired toaubmlt complete structural framing plans with application due to the complexity of the structure, If the following information
18 Insufficlant for proper plan review.
Foundation tx \ "1'1 ~b
Footing sIZe;
Wall rMterIal:
Wall height
PIer or column size:
PIer or column footing alZe:
No. of crawlspace venta:
Footing reinforcing:
Wall thlcknees;
Wall reinforcing:
PIer or COlumn spacing:
Pier or COlumn reinforcing:
Crawllpace: 0 Full 0 Plirtial
y}.\c,{\~
FRAMING: Ualn Carrying member8: SIze:
\rat FloOr Framing JoIR 8Ize: ,'l, "^ \0
--
second FloOr Framing Joist siD;
CeIling Framing Joist site: j:>J. '6
Roof fnImIng Rafter size: 1..1-\0
Maximum Span: It.. 0
Maximum Span: .:--
Maximum Span: .Jt..14..~u
Melctmum Span: n..O
S'm Spacing:
M8Xlmum Spacing: · 0.17.
MaxImum Spactng: -
Maximum Spacing; \lit" ON.
Maximum Spacing: \"" D.lt.
Roof Truss
Applk:ant must submit design calculations for all wood truI8eS stamped by a Reglatered Prof8l!81on engineer.
INTERIOR FINISH
Bedrooms
Uving Room
Family Room
Dining Room
Bathroom
Utility Room
Special (specify)
Attic
Cellar
EXTERIOR FINISH
Wall Materl8t \J.)H\ '1:lLL&.n~ ~ \))b~~
:::::al A~~~~}~ J
Walls
~~1t.."V "sLf.L,\~~.tt-
AooI'8
tA>OOO
, CeIling ~
~AJ.l? 1!l:J '
NOTEI AND DATE (For D......... UIe)
FEE CALCUALTlONS
I
/~O2.' r
1079 .>' t!7/i'C/0
~
'~ 7 l> !..
X'7'>
I
I
.
!
! .
4. ZONING COMPLIANCE To ... oomp....d .., III .........
Applicant la required to submit a reglattnd plot plan with application. Ihowlng . location of aD atructures.
I Zoning District: I Vlr-.:J Total Land Area: ...,., r J2. t. sF
, Frontage on Street:. ? q 2. . s-o Lot No.
Plan Book No. and Page: ITFq Land Court Plan No.
Date lot PurchaSed: I I ., t' Certificate No. ,
Name of Prevloua Owner: ~1!J1PI ~
SUBDIVISION INFORMATION tJ I " (otJ P\ \M )
Name of Owner:
Date of Plan Approval:
Type of ApproVal: ANR AR
Planning Board file No.
la the Subdlvialon subject to a Covenant: YES NO
Is a ReIeIlN requIrecI: YES NO
Hal Plan been filed with the AegIstry of DeecIs? YES NO
If YES: Plan Book and Page No. Date
TIME SHARING
INFORMATION
Is there a declaration of
Covenan1S and Restrictiona of
Interval Ownership nol8d on
your Tille or Deed?
Yes_ No_
DIMENSIONS
J Di8tance from Property Unea: FRONT *=\ S, -. >_ .~33 :1)' LEFT 1'71. I S- RIGHT J16. z.~-
DIatanc:e between Principal and Secondary Dwelflng: -N1A (12ft. minimum.)
HeIght of Itructure abOVe finish grade: N . E S W
Number of off-street parklg spaces: EncIoIed 0n-sIte
.
GROUND COVER ~ 1."
Principal DwellIng: ~ . If .,
Secondary Dwelling: .--
Adc:IltIon: '
TOC8I: ~.Ir
A11ow8b1e/ ,.. S-1i2'
SF.
SF.
,.
Garage:
Accessory Building:
Swimming Pool:
Other:
'"
'"
'"
MISCELLANEOUS
Was a request to "Determing AppIiCabHity of the Weiland ProI8ctIOn /d' flied with the Nantucket COrIIerYatlon eommittee? YES _NO L-
If answered YES, Inclde "Order of ConditIOnS" with apptIcatIOn.
What date WIS the "Order of Conditions" with application.
What date WIS the "Order of Conditions" filed with the R8g18t1y of Deeds? J
Is the property located wlthlng a FloOd Huard dJatrict1 YES NO
was a VarIanCe or $pectal PermIt granted by the Boerd of ApeeIs? YES
If answered YES. what date was the declalon filed with the Town Clerk?
NO J
FOR BUilDING DEPARTMENT USE ONLY
Minimum L'ot Size: r
Frontage on 'Street. .
Front Yard:
AddltlonaJ Commen..:
Ground CcMr Ratio:
SIde and Rear SettleCtc:
Date:
APPROVED BY:
ZOnIng Officer
$. IOENTIFICAnON . To be complettICI b'" .........
NIIM Mlallng addl1lllS - Number. street. citY. and Stat,
Zip Code
TelephOne No.
1.
OWller or
Lessee
2.
General
Contraetor
& ~
Contractor
Signature
4.
Architect or
EngIneer
I hereby certify that the proposed work is authorized by the owner of lecord and that I have been aulhorizlld by the owner to malIe tbl& application as
his authorized agent and we agree to conform to all applicable laws of this jurisdiction.
Addr...
8. PLAN REVIEW RECORD. For Olllce Ute
Plans R8YIew Required
HISTORIC D1STRICS COMMISS10ij .I ~3 ?71f -,.:/~ ~c>>-y
SEPTIC ~.... -~. ffu 1'- -'.... r-.." -/2. 4A L- ~ -:a"_ ,A ~",,-7 of,,('i j
SEWER -:7 -/ -'" -.B/ ..Ji' ~
WATER WELL COMPLETION REPORT ." D I.L .,... j..:3 -00
CONSERVATION COMMISSION
BOARD OF APPEALS
SECONDARY OWELUNG APPROVAL (Planning Board)
FIRE CHIEF
OVER-THE-ROAD (Solid of Selectmenl
RELEASE FORM (Planning Boatd)
ROAD OPENING PERMIT (OPW)
PLUMBING
ELECTRICAL
t' tl>S/v",
DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE
~
:\
~
7. VALIDATION
Building FOR OEPARTME:NT USE ONLY
Permit number
Use Group
Fire Grading
Building Live Loading
Permit issued
occupancy Load ~ ~
Census No, ~,
Date of
Reissuance
Building 4c!U~
Permit Fee
Approved by:
Data of Issuance of ~~~
Certificate of Occupancy
Building Inspector
\.--/
-
Ji.!5J aO
RECEIVED
BOARD OF ASSESSORS '
MAY 1 0 Z006
TOWN OF
NANTUCKET. MA
I
Town of Nantucket
ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
LIST OF P ART1ES IN INTEREST IN THE MA TIER OF THE PETITION OF
PROPERTY OwN.ER....~ ........ ...... ..i..:...O~......
MAILING ADDRESS.....................;Z:...... j;1...:.............. ......... 'If) I
PROPERTY LOCATION......... .~.. ........... ...... ...~ ..p:;qt
, 77- 7Jf
ASSESSORS MAPfPARCEL:..........................,...................................
APPLlCANT......~...~........_..............
SEE A TI ACHED PAGES
1 certify that the foregoing is a list of persons who e.re owners of abutting property, owners of
land directly opposite on lIlY public or private street or way; and e..butter.s of the abutters and an
other land owners within 300 feet of the. property line of owner's property, a\l as they appear ?n .
the most recent applicable tax list (lvi.C.L. c. 40A, Section 11 Zoning Code Chapter 139.
Section 139-29D(2) .
~"(/r""~'4.(} 0
DATE'
R~a4i
ASSESSOR'S OFFICE
Town of Nantucket
...
Q)
tn
<= nl
0 '"
...
.. ~~~fiH!~~
as
tJ '"
0 P: ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
" i
...
.. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
tJ i!l
..
as '" 0 III ... ... .. '"
Po f< ... '" ... '" '" '" '"
.. '" '" '" '" '" '" ..
III .. III ... '" ... '" III
" III III ... 0 .. ... 0 III
... '" ... '" 0 '" '" 0 '"
to 0 0 0 ... 0 0 '" 0
f< ~ t;: ~ t;: ~ ~ " ~
'" ...
f< Oil f<
B ~ :0 ~ ~ ~ : ~
& ~~ii!i!~
'"
">~ CD
"
..
~
.0:
'"
<=
...
...
i
Cl
~~
tIl
H ~
..:IE-<
I!I::I
tIl~
P::CJ
I!I::I~
~~
~
~ !:l
... Po
S (04 ::
'" '" f<
~ ~ :0 = '" = :0
:0 ... g r: i'il r: "
~ !:l 8 '" ~ '" t
::::O:OIll"'IO!i\!~
:: Ht:~t;~ :;:5!
~ 2!",~li! ",lil
~ OOCJ\&n""O\~r4
.c PtC"lNN\DC"tI"'iO\
f<
'"
~
i
:0
"
.
..
"
~
f<
~ ~
a f<
~
Ii! a
i
; I
o
l>
f<
'"
P:
f<
i E ~ ~ '" ~
~~~..~ ~
~~~ail!;::II
~..!<g;"IIl",i
~ to) A fij m m A
l:l A .. ... .; ~ = ..
~ ~ ~ e Oil 0 ;
~ l>i<l> t!iS...f<
if AP:;:s::i! :11:0
:0 Bf<:o",,,Aa~1Il
.. 0 P: Oil to g
· "'tlP:f<
1 ~I~~~i~~
..
...
g
co 0\ co 0\ co co 010
~"'" s
"
\.\
N .... .... III '" r-- co co
r-- t"- r- too r--- r-- too
r-- r-- f"o r-- r-- f"o r--
l
)
.0
- ..><
) <>
.2
. ~f
:z
'-
o
c
3:
o
f-
,.
'"
..
..
N
...
M
o
o
N
.....
o
...
.....