Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout046-04 . , . TOWN OF NANTUCKET BOARD OF APPEALS NANTUCKET, MASSACHUSETTS 02554 Date: ~'Iem~ /5 ' 200c( To: Parties in Interest and, Others concerned with the Decision of the BOARD OF APPEALS in the Application of the following: Application No.: Oc,lC,/'Dt( Owner/Applicant: IOtLn O~ A./an'f-c/cb-t- ~ Ji-S-elf as (') W()Pr. (] fA dl ~ Alan Yo cJc{J"7t ~ d u ('0 "'h h YJ , TnJST (NPT) Jessee Enclosed is the Decision of the BOARD OF APPEALS which has this day been filed in the office of the Nantucket Town Clerk. An Appeal from this Decision may be taken pursuant to Section 17 of Chapter 40A, Massachusetts General Laws. Any action appealing the Decision must be brought by filing an complaint in court within TWENTY (20) days after this day'S date. Notice of the action with a copy of the complaint and certified copy of the Decision must be given to the Town Clerk so as to be received within such TWENTY (20) days. d .c~ cc: Town Clerk Planning Board Building Commissioner (~::J N -.J PLEASE NOTE: MOST SPECIAL PERMITS AND VARIANCES HAVE A TIME LIMIT AND WILL EXPIRE IF NOT ACTED UPON ACCORDING'TO NANTUCKET ZONING BY-LAW ~139-30I (SPECIAL PERMITS); ~139-32I (VARIANCES) ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE CALL THE NANTUCKET ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS. NANTUCKET ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS 1 East Chestnut Street Nantucket, Massachusetts 02554 Assessor's Map 55 Parcels 613 and 614 R-10 2-4 Cow Pond Lane Plan Book 2, Page 52, Lot 3 Plan Files 54-X and 2-04, Lot 4 Deed Ref. 622/321 and 842/247 DECISION: 1. At a public hearing of the Nantucket Zoning Board of Appeals, on Friday, August 13,2004, at 1:00 P.M., in the Conference Room in the Town Annex Building, 37 Washington Street, Nantucket, Massachusetts, the Board made the following Decision on the Application (046-04) of TOWN OF NANTUCKET FOR ITSELF AS OWNER, AND FOR NANTUCKET EDUCATION TRUST (NET), LESSEE, with a mailing address of 16 Broad Street, Nantucket, MA 02554 and PO Box 1465, Nantucket, MA 02554, respectively, in connection with property known as 2 - 4 Cow Pond Road, Nantucket, Massachusetts. 2. Applicant (NET) is seeking relief by V ARlANCE pursuant to Nantucket Zoning By-law Section 139-32 from the provisions of Nantucket Zoning By-law Section 139-16A (Intensity Regulations - side/rear yard setback). Applicant is asking to be able to reduce the northerly side yard setback from the required ten feet to as close as one foot in order to re-site a single-family dwelling closer to the lot line. The Massachusetts Historical Society (MHS) has done an archeological review as part of the overall review process for a muhi-unit housing development associated with the Nantucket Public School system and has determined that there may be a potential Native American campsite on a portion of subject Lot 4. MHS is requiring that the structure be sited a minimum of20 feet way from the protected area. The Lot also would contain a separate conforming duplex structure, having obtained a Multi-Family Special Permit from the Nantucket Planning Board. The Premises is located at 2-4 COW POND LANE, Assessor's Map 55, Parcels 613 and 614, Plan Book 2, Page 52, Plan File 54-X and Plan File No. 2-04, Lot 4. The property is zoned Residential-l O. 3. Our Decision is based upon the Application and accompanying materials, plans, photographs, representations and testimony received at our public hearing. The Planning Board made no recommendation, as the matter was not of planning concern. There were no letters on file other than those submitted by the Applicant and there was no support or opposition expressed at the public hearing. 4. Applicant (NET) represented that they had entered into a long-term lease with the Town of Nantucket and the Nantucket School Committee to construct housing that would be dedicated to use by the school on Town-owned property. There were four lots in the subdivision, with the Locus being the northernmost lot on Cow Pond Lane. The Planning Board granted Special Permit No. 02-04 which approved 12 units in eight structures on four lots, under the Multi-family Overlay By-law and allowed second driveway access. The Locus was to be improved with two structures, the subject structure known as "Building 8", a single-family dwelling, and a separate duplex structure known as "Building 7". The Lot and Building 7 are conforming in all respects to the dimensional requirements of the Zoning By-law. However; as a result of a report from the Massachusetts Historical Commission (MHC), which determined that there was a possible Native American "dwelling site" covering a substantial portion of the Lot, Applicant has been required to relocate Building 8 as far away from the specified restricted area that encompasses the easterly portion of the Lot. As a result, Building 8 bas to be sited as close to the northerly side yard lot line, which is proposed to be zero feet. MHC had asked for at least a 20-foot setback from the outer perimeter of the crrcle and even with the zero setback they would not,be able to meet the 20-foot requirement. Applicant stated that the proposed site was the only location that would possibly satisfy the MHC and still be able to construct this dwelling unit. Applicant stated that this situation appeared to be unique to this particular lot as no other sensitive archeological sites were determined to exist on the other three lots in the same subdivision. 5. Based upon the foregoing, the Board :fu.tds that the unique situation created by the possible archeological discovery related to the Native American population that historically inhabited the Island and affecting Applicant's land and not affecting the Residential-l0 zoning district generally and the possible loss of Applicant's ability to construct much needed school related housing on the Locus due to restrictions on the location of Building 8, would result in substantial hardship to the Applicant and the community. The Board further finds that relocating the dwelling to a point no closer than one foot from the northerly side yard lot line would result in a desirable public benefit in creating more school related housing and be in harmony with the general purpose and intent of the Zoning By-law and would have minimal impact as the property immediately abutting the Locus is school property. The Board further finds that Variance relief may be granted without substantial detriment to the public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent or purpose of the Zoning By-law. 6. Accordingly, the Board of Appeals, by a vote of four in favor (Waine, Loftin, O'Mara, Toole) and one opposed (Sevrens), the Board GRANTS the requested relief by VARIANCE under Section 139-16A to permit the single-family dwelling (shown as Building 8 on a plan done by Nantucket Surveyors, Inc., dated July 13. 2004, a reduced copy of which is attached hereto and marked as Exhibit A, and attached for the sole purpose of identifying the subject Lot 4 and structures contained therein, and not for the purpose of siting the structures in the specific locations shown), based upon the following condition: (a) The relocated structure shall have a minimum ofa one-foot setback from the northerly side yard lot line, and there shall be a minimum often feet between Building 7 and the subject Building 8 on this tot 4. (OY~/.O ~) Dated: September15-, 2004 Nancy 1. Sevrens ~Ia -:( NIl "'l .~ I \\J08S\N7199\Z8A07-12-lU >- ~ Id C8\DlSl< FHO. ~-<~<' ~11N ac-~lS ac- ~~ till ~~~if" ~i~# ~}I II ----. NOlES 1) SEE LEASE RECORDED IN DO.8K.842. PG.247, 2) lHE LOTS _ HEREON HAW: tHE IlENEFIT cYF AND ARE SUB.ECT TO A SProAL PERIllT GRANtED BY lHE NANlUCI<ET P\.ANNINO 8OARD, FOR PROPERTY UNE OETERtoIlNA nON THIS PlOT PlAN REUES ON CURRENT DEEDS AND PlANS cYF REcORD, \UllFIED BY FlElD lIEASUREt.lENl'S AS SHOIIN HEREON. nilS PlAN IS NOT REPRESENm> TO BE A TI'lU: EXAIlINAlION OR A RECDRDAIlI.E SUR~. .e. 281 38 PLOT PLAt-{ TO ACCOMPANY Z.B.A. APPUCA TlON IN NANTUCKE~ MASSACHUSETTS SCALE: 1"=40' DATE:JULY 13, 2004- DEED REFERENCE: DD.BK.622,PG.321 PLAN REFERENCE: PL.NO. 03-52 ASSESSOR'S REFERENCE: MAP: 55 PARCEL: 613 & 614 PREPARED FOR: THE NANTUCKET EDUCATIONAL TRUST NANTUCKET SURVEYORS INC. 5 WINDY WAY NANTUCKE~ MA. 02554 OVERLAY DISlRICTS: pueuc WEllHEAD RECHARGE; I.IULllFAMILY CURRENT ZONING: R-l0 MINIMUM LOT SIZE: 10,000 S.F. MINIMUM FRONTAGE: 75 FT, FRONlYARO SETBACK: 20 FT. SIDE ANO REAR SETBACK; 10 FT. ALLOWABLE G.C.R.: 20:1 N 7199 TOWN OF NANTUCKET ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS 1 EAST CHESTNUT STREET NANTUCKET, MASSACHUSETTS 02554 PHONE 508-228-7215 FAX 508-228-7205 NOTICE A Public Hearing of the NANTUCKET ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS will be held at 1:00 P.M., FRIDAY, AUGUST 13,2004, IN THE CONFERENCE ROOM, TOWN ANNEX BUILDING, 37 Washington Street, Nantucket, Massachusetts, on the Application of the following: TOWN OF NANTUCKET FOR ITSELF AS OWNER, AND FOR NANTUCKET EDUCATION TRUST (NET), LESSEE BOARD OF APPEALS FILE NO. 046-04 Applicant (NET) is seeking relief by VARIANCE pursuant to Nantucket Zoning By-law Section 139-32 from the provisions of Nantucket Zoning By-law Section 139- 16A (Intensity Regulations - side/rear yard setback). Applicant is asking to be able to reduce the northerly side yard setback from the required ten feet to as close as one foot in order to re-site a single-family dwelling closer to the lot line. The Massachusetts Historical Society (MHS) has done an archeological review as part of the overall review process for a multi-unit housing development associated with the Nantucket Public School system and has determined that there may be a potential Native American campsite on a portion of subject Lot 4. MHS is requiring that the structure be sited a minimum of20 feet way from the protected area. The Lot also would contain a separate conforming duplex structure, having obtained a Multi-Family Special Permit from the Nantucket Planning Board. The Premises is located at 2-4 COW POND LANE, Assessor's Map 55, Parcels 613 and 614, Plan Book 2, Page 52, Plan File 54-X and Plan File No. 2-04, Lot 4. The property is zoned Residential-l O. ~~ ~('€JYvv Nancy J. Sevrens, irman TillS NOTICE IS AVAILABLE IN LARGE PRINT OR OTHER ALTERNATIVE FORMATS. PLEASE CALL 508-228-7215 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION. CJ .\-~ ::-J ,;1 I \ l.....,j -l"\ ",;II . ;J \d . \ j '-\ 01 t\ . ')",., . .. I NANTUCKET ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS " 1 EAST CHESTNUT STREET NANTUCKET, MA 02554 APPLICATION FOR RELIEF CASE NO. 0 Yfo~ Y FEE; j300.00 Owner's name(s): Mailing address: Applicant's name(s): Mailing address: . . Locus' address: Land Court Pia /Plan ~ ge n File N .: Date lot : . / ~/a3.. Deed Ref./Cert. of Title: Co :Uses on Lot - Commercial: None )( Yes (describe) Residential: Number of dwellings_ Duplex-...: Apartments Rental Rooms . B~ilding Date(s): All pre-date 7/721 or ~~rr-( JCY-r'CfO) C ofO(s)? B,uilding Permit Nos: fJ;plAllYl'i-0 C~Yrvr11Jr.l t: S;:-flvr~ II%; foJ Y /2 ,O/) }/JI/'!1J5 Previous Zoning Board Application Nos.: '6fJ ~ Ic State below or on a separate addendum specific reli~f sought (Special Permit, Variance, Appeal), Section of the Zoning By.:.law, and supporting.details, grounds for gr.ant of relief, ljs.til!,g aJll e!i~ti~g 1}0ncoA.for~i~: ~ romY 0 J)Q. ' . UOn'''M..~., cJnClX-Qr' ~o:Jlr CYI Lsy-Jrc> . '1!!>{'(?thJ~ ~(I) '. . J:tblL ~ot~bOQtlJo7YJ ~pif, ?o ~ ~itdcf' ~cJ?- ~.. Rti-/rQ- f1?[{J ~,-'RLm/Zu cOtm?r~J t 'fk m~, W ~ufl. . CJA,C~cr: (NJ /2QrfiW- /~~~~~J;'-I ~t:~1:~,~ ~~~V~yt;~ O/?1fl1itnodly ~~. I certify that the information contained herein is substantially complete and true to the best of my knowledge, under the pains and penalties of perjury. SIGNATURE: 6t.~. , Applicant /" Attorney/Agent (If not owner or owner s attorney, please enclose pro f of agency to bring this matter before the Board) FO FleE USE 'V Application received on:.:iJ.:l ct By: Complete: Need copies?: ~ Filed with Town Clerk:_1}&/~Planning Bo . / : Fee deposited with Town Treasurer:_I_/_ By: Waiver requested?: Granted:~_I_ Hearing notice posted with Town Clerk:~/~K2!f- Mailed: / 1-0 I&M:/ iZY./oC( & ?Id/Qi Hearing(s) held OD:_I_I_, Opened on:_I_I_ Continued to:~_I_ Withdrawn?:_I_I_ DECISION DUE BY:_I_I_ Made:_I_I_ Filed wfrown Clerk:_I_I_ Mailed:_I_I_ n14'r"TC;:!Tn'M A DUt;" A I' t;"n'l. C'lI'Tnr.onl'nn r<^I'TnT. I' ... 1lo.Tn .ronl'Tn"" "'" _ u_u .. 'A" 'A" I ! I I I ! I I r I ( . "~-- ~ / ;- / ~ / < I I / / ( / / I I ! I / I I / / /;: ~ ~ ( '~, ; \~ ~~...." ('" / _, 1 "~ &/ 0~ _ _ ~ :I :\~~~$$f >\<r ~, \~ "~ ') ~ / """ / " ( ( ~> -", <, \': '/ fil' e) ,~l ~ 0' ~.~ r'\\ ~"'-J '- ",-:, ~ 'P< '\) ~ ~~ ~ ~ ('\ ,-, J;. Q\ \) (,,' ,\J C)) (~ V) ~ 'j"-0~' ~ \5~};y/~ \J r",~~^v~ ~ '~"f f\~ ~ -i5 C':i Cry \J ~ 1'\ 0' ~J)~ ............... .. \ ,~ v 5J: -53 o~ OF NANTUCKl T 1',2 12.14 6' I. 7 A MILES 100, f I N 98 000 --L ~L~ w".'31 PR~~:~'~~~~~NG~N~~~H~~I~;.I'~~'l::::YORS 'Il ~ .' ~ ,f' LU y. FEOEPAl S'.. NANIUCKET. MASS. O' 0 Z . <<ji~~' ~~i~I~ '-I'm ~~8 ~r"':"''''..', ',\,' /1, :o:>"\t"\ J!TE~ ~ ..,1, ; ", ,_, ' .:\ '.,~~.I';i I ';~:{ ,:~~ J.,~. ~ ~ -. 3 ~:- ,'~:' ,~ . ..' ,,:. r .. '\ ,,",'\'IlJ\,~ ,3,-...",.,)" (j C ~ iI: . <;. ' '.~'\: ", .-;:=--=--~ ,I> ." - .\(:'~::~,t:.:/.&:~'.';' :~-._<<~, [;,.- , ~' "'::a..~, "'_,:_~_ _~ ,"," _~ ~ -u'. ,_1<'" "'Jt;.r J.. .~... ,,' \. ~.(,,~<$r." ""'@" ".~' ~~, ,1 .. J> t~.",",- _cA' ,". ~",'.."r.l',>""'''''.'' t"\'''I..t;''~. ......~115 ,'" 1 ;~~ i>~:; ,''' ;;~~~ i ~~i'~1~R;&,ti;t!:~''';,;~'' "":.~"" 1.:" ' :'(" ,~"!..' . ,. .. (J~l_,.~..SI',_ _ ~,... '1>'",-, '-. ') ,HEET INDEX ~\:t"-J~ ...... ~ " July 13, 2004 Ms. Unda Williams 1 East Chestnut Street Nantucket, MA 02554 Dear Ms. Williams, We have submitted the paperwork for a zoning variance. lbis is necessitated by the restrictions placed on us by the Massachusetts Historical Commission following there archaeological site examination. The Town of Nantuck as waived all fees associated with this project (Copy attached) and we are hoping that your board ~7 f~ ~ well1b.nk you in ,d=e fo' cou.wemtiou of tlli eeqoe," Treasurer Nantucket Educational Trost PO BOX 1465 NANTUCKET, MA 02554 ~ Town and County of Nantucket Board of Selectmen. County Commissioners Finn Murphy, Chairman Matthew G. Fee Timothy M. Soverino Frank T, Spriggs Bruce L. Watts 16 Broad Street Nantucket. Massachusetts 02554 Telephone (5081 228-7255 Fa~e(5081228-7272 www.town.nantucket.ma.us C, Elizabeth Gibson Town & County Administrator October 24, 2003 Nantucket Educational Trust ATTN: Douglas T. Williams P.O. Box 1465 Nantucket, MA 02554 Dear Mr. Williams: At the meeting of October 22, 2003, the Board of Selectmen voted to waive the following fees in association with the construction ofthe school employee housing project: . Building Permit . Sewer Permit . Electrical Permit . Plumbing Permit . Gas Permit . Landfill Fees Please feel free to contact this office if you have any questions. Thank you. Sincerely, i1i:ll!!.!J1(f~ Office Administrator pc: Public Works Department Building Department Waste Options, Inc. ~ The Commonwealth of Massachusetts William Francis Galvin, Secretary of the Commonwealth Massachusetts Historical Commission , , June 30, 2004 Daug Williams Nantucket Education Trust P.O. Bax 1465 Nantucket. MA 02554 RE: Nantucket School Staff Hausing Project, Caw Pand Lane and First Way, Nantucket, MHC #RC.3378I DearMr. Williams: Staff .of the Massachusetts Histarical Commissian have reviewed the campletian memorandum for the archaealagical site examinatian of the Dwelling Site at the prapased Nantucket School Staff Housing Praject, which was prepared by PAL and received at this office June 23, 2004. The fallawing paragraphs address the findings of:the site examination and the recomnieIi.daliansin the 'campletionmemorandum. The site examination cOIi.sisted oran investigatian .of the Dwelling'Site;' which was identified in an intensive archaeblagical surveyofllie project':area iri December2003:,:Resrilts'afthe:intensive survey indicated that the Dwelling Site included,a complex of archaeologicillfeatures' lotated1n the nartheast corner .of the project area. The site represents a dwelling and associated a:i::tivityareasassociated with members of the late seventeenth ta eighteenth-century Miacomet Indian community. Upon review of the results of the intensive survey. the MHC found the Dwelling Site eligible for listing in the Natianal Register of Historic Places (36 CFR 60). MHC concurred with the recommendatian in the completion memorandum that the Dwelling Site be avoided during constructian .of the propased Nantucket School Staff Housing Project, and that an archaeological site examination be conducted to gather additional information including identifying possible .owners or occupants .of the site, as well as to detennine the exact horizantal and vertical boundaries of the site, so that the feasibility .of avoiding the site cauld be evaluated. The results of the site examinatian confirmed the special significance .of the Dwelling Site and discavered additional unusual and noteworthy aspects of the site. The investigation revealed a remarkable complex of archaeological features including the complete outline of a Native American wigwam or wetu with a central fire area and the remnants of a sleeping platform, a larger structure similar in form to a'longhause, and between the twa structures several'autdaor coaking areas. Documentary research and artifacts associated with these features indicate thafthe site dates tothe eight~enth centu'ry and is :assbc'iated with the Miacomet Indian'community:- The report concludes thatthe largeistructurelikelY:fepresenfs the remains of the Miacomet meetinghouse. "",,' , , ' Thepresertationand clarityoffeatures at this site is extraordinary: The cambination of the complete identifiable dwelling structure, the larger structure with a probable institutional functian, and the 220 Morrissey Boulevard, Boston, Massachusetts 02125 (617) 727-8470 · Fax: (617) 727-5128 www.state.ma.us/see/mhe .,I domestic work area is unique not only in Nantucket, but in all of Massachusetts, possibly all of New England. The identification of these features with an identifiable Native American community for which written records are extremely sketchy, gives it exceptional potential for research and education. The site is also extremely vulnerable to disturbance. The soil stains and artifact deposits that delineate the structures and their individual components are thin and lie close to the ground surface. Impacts from construction, traffic, and landscaping will permanently disfigure and irretrievably destroy the unique patterning that the site examination has made visible, Only through careful protection can this significaFlt site be preserved. Current plans for the housing project as shown in the completion memorandum call for the construction of Building 8 less than two feet from the Dwelling Site, and contain no provisions for the protection of the site once construction is completed, Given the proximity of the site to the planned building, the Dwelling Site will certainty be damaged during construction, even if some protective measures are taken, After construction, the site will suffer further damage and degradation of its research v:1lue through landscaping, gardening, construction of outbuildings, installation of utilities, and other activities and construction projects of twenty-first-century residential land use, Given the exceptional significance and fragility of the Dwelling Site, M.HC has determined that the construction of the Nantucket Education Trust Staff Housing Project will have an will have an "adverse effect" on the Dwelling Site through the physical destruction of all or part of this historic property (950 CMR 71.05(a)). MHC requests that the project proponent avoid the adverse effect by avoiding and protecting the site by implementing the following measures, which are based on the recommendations in the completion memorandum, . Altering the proposed location of Building 8 so that it is located at least 20 feet from the site, . Prior to construction, marking the area containing the Dwelling Site as well as a surrounding 20-foot buffer zone in the field with highly visible material such as snow fencing posted with "No Trespassing" signs as a no-access no-traffic zone. An archaeologist from PAL should participate in or approve the layout of the field markings, The fence line should be clearly marked on project maps and labeled as "Sensitive Resource Area. No Access Allowed." Contract specifications should be written to indicate that this area is a no-access no-traffic zone. Construction personnel and contractors shall be informed verbally and in writing that no impacts or access are permitted in the fenced area, After the completion of construction, the fencing may be removed. . After construction is complete, avoiding landscaping, fence installation, or other construction within the Dwelling Site area. . Placing a preservation restriction on the part of the project area that contains the Dwelling Site, pursuant to Massachusetts General Law, Chapter 184, section 31. This will ensure that the site will be protected from impacts after construction is completed and the housing project is in use, . Initiating consultation between MHC the Nantucket Education Trust, and the town/county authorities with jtlrisdiction over Cow Pond Lane, the improvement or expansion of which may threaten the adjacent Dwelling Site, If these avoidance and protection measures do not appear to be feasible, MHC requests the opportunity to consult with the project proponent, the MDFA, the Nantucket Historical Commission, and the Nantucket Historic District Commission pursuant to (950 CMR 71.07(3), in order to consider alternatives that could eliminate, minimize, or mitigate the adverse effect including but not limited to mitigation through an archaeological data recovery program for the Dwelling Site. These comments are offered to assist in compliance with Massachusetts General Laws, Chapter 9, Sections 26-27C (950 CMR 71). If you have any questions concerning this review, please feel free to contact Eric Johnson at this office. Sincerely, ~~ Brona Simon State Archaeologist Deputy State Historic Preservation Officer Massachusetts Historical Commission xc: Allison Sweet Zieff, Vaughan, Dale and Hunter MDFA Nantucket Historic District Commission Nantucket Historical Commission Deborah Cox, PAL it 5.00 Town of Nantucket '":CEIVED . Pi" ':;": C)F ASSESSORS JU~ 0 9 2004 ')\NN OF '",.J TUCKET, MA ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS LIST OF PARTIES IN INTEREST IN THE MATTER OF THE PETITION OF PROPERTY OwNER... .Z;h?lf),...Q P... .&.~.~/.~~/:-::........... ~ . ~ MAILING ;DDREltl..r.~~.~~72'~(!."';;:~ PROPERTY LOCA TrON........... .y...................................... 0.....0....... 'ASSESSORS MAPfPARCE{.......~~=..{?,.f3..............:<:?.......G~ ~};J Cr9d~, .s:) -- <5 I 'l APPLICANT, &-:~.<'.k~,. .(?;,P~Cf!: T:(,0,.,....~ .L!.~.C..",.. SEE ATTACHED PAGES , I certify that the foregoing is a list of persons who are owners of abutting property, owners of land directl~ opposite on any public or private street or way; and abutter.s of the abutters and all other land owners within 300 feet of the, property Iirie of owner's property, all as they appear on the most recent applicable tax list (M.C.L. c. 40A, Section 11 Zoning Code Chapter 139. Section 139-29D (2) .. f2df/&'" "i?M.i DATE' , bJ-. /J~ f~../t(.?.. ASSESSOR'S OFFICE Town of Nantucket ----------- -' "- ,.... '" "- N o o g:~g:g:~g:~g:g:g::::g:~t:g:::::::g::::g: ! '" N f.1' N ~ o\o,\O'lO'lO'lO'lO'lO'lo\O'lO'lO\..NNNNN........ t-t ........OOOOOOOOOON......WWOO 0 ....O\,OCD..JO'lln,..WN....OlnN....OlDlD....O ct .... '" W 1 'f ~ ~~.. '" ~ k~~~~ M~t~ ~t;; ~.... ~ ~nnQgnn"lillll>II>II>I:II>II>II>"l"lll>~ a :giili!li!ii...II>"'''''''>iI'''''''''......~~ I>> ~ :g :g :g :g :g :g ~ ~ E E E ~ E E E ~ ~ ~ II> ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ i!i i!i ~ ~ ~ ~ t:I ~. n ~~~~~~ ~~~~ ~~~ ; ~. ~ e ~ ~ ~ lee I;; ;;;;; ~ e e.; ; I @1l1l1l~~~~BBSBBBB~~~8B ~ ~iii~III~~:~~~~~II~: E ill ~illillilliJiJ~iJiJ~HI~illilliJg ~ ; ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ : ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ :~~; ::l~~ 1: t!IJ t':I t-J ~ e l'!I P.I :< ~ a ~ III .... o n ... .... ~ ~. It ... ~ ~ ~ n ~ n n ~ ~ i "- 0 ~~ n l e : ~ ~ i ~~ to' " .. ~ !Z: !Z: .. I o~ II ~ 1li ~ ~ i';l !Z: ~ i ~~ '" 1li 1li n ~ H ... ;j '" '" tn "l lil ;j ;j ~~ ... ~ >iI <: d II> II> !2: >iI ~ (j) ;::~~~;~;::;::~~:;::;::;:~:;:O'l;::;:::;:~ ~ E888EEEEm~mmmmmiEE~~ i >iI a III III e >iI >iI >iI ~ 1; ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ II> >iI >iI ~ w ~ "l : : ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ... ~ ~ ~ ill ... ... ... ... ... ... ~ ~ ~ ~ if ~. .... ~, ~ oil i I>> II II '" I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I n ~. ~ >iI >iI >iI >iI >iI >iI >iI >iI >iI >iI >iI >iI >iI >iI >iI >iI >iI >iI >iI >iI ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ II> >iI l '" llJ o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .. '" N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N ~. CD l.n l.n l.n l.n l.n l.n l.n l.n l.n l.n l.n l.n l.n l.n l.n l.n l.n l.n l.n l.n '" f-' l.n l.n l.n l.n l.n l.n l.n l.n l.n l.n l.n l.n l.n l.n l.n l.n l.n l.n l.n CD ,.. ,.. ,.. ,.. ,.. ,.. ,.. ,.. ,.. .. ,.. .. ,.. ,.. .. .. ,.. .. ,.. ..