HomeMy WebLinkAbout025-04
TOWN OF NANTUCKET
BOARD OF APPEALS
NANTUCKET, MASSACHUSEITS 02554
Date:
j U'fle.-.-
9
, 200t.{
To: Parties in Interest and. Others concerned with the
Decision of the BOARD OF APPEALS in the Application of the
following:
Application No.:
bwner/Applicant:
o G~-O 4-
D-e \ocYU h
~n &.0LS'C){)
Enclosed is the Decision of the BOARD OF APPEALS which has
this day been filed in the office of the Nantucket Town
Clerk.
An Appeal from this Decision may be taken pursuant to
Section 17 of Chapter 40A, Massachusetts General L~~.
c.
d
A
......... "-
Any'action appealing the Decision must be brought ~y ~
filing an complaint in court within TWENTY (20) days afte~
this day's date. Notice of the action with a copy or the
complaint and certified copy of the Decision must be giveE8
to the Town Clerk so as to be received within such TWENTY~
(20) days. \okJ6A \ S;~
r\)()JV\ ~ \J, JQ.~ Cbairman
cc: Town Clerk
Planning Board
Building Commissioner
PLEASE NOTE: MOST SPECIAL PERMITS AND VARIANCES HAVE A TIME
LIMIT AND WILL EXPIRE IF NOT ACTED UPON ACCORDING'TO NANTUCKET
ZONING BY-LAW ~139-30I (SPECIAL PERMITS); ~139-32I (VARIANCES)
I
ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE CALL THE NANTUCKET ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS.
~
NANTUCKET ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
37 Washington Street
Nantucket, Massachusetts 02554
Assessor's Map 55.4.4
Parcel 96
27 Mill Street
Residential-1
Certificate of Title No. 20,994
Certificate of Title No.20,994
Plan No.17887-D, Lot 3
DECISION:
At a Public Hearing of the Nantucket Zoning Board of
Appeals, on Friday April 2, 2004, at 1:00 P.M. in the
Conference Room, Town Annex Building, 37 Washington Street,
Nantucket, Massachusetts, the Board made the following
Decision on the Application of DEBORAH ANDERSON, Owner, of
27 Mill Street, Nantucket, Massachusetts 02554, File No.
025-04.
1. Applicant is seeking relief by SPECIAL PERMIT under
Nantucket Zoning By-law Section 139-33A
(alteration/expansion of a pre-existing/nonconforming
structure/use). Applicant is asking the Board to allow the
alteration and extension of a pre-existing nonconforming
secondary dwelling. In the event it is determined that the
renovations to the cottage did not amount to a demolition
and the cottage retained its grandfathered status as to
setbacks, the Applicant is now requesting relief under this
section to regularize the alterations already undertaken
and completed within the required side/rear and front yard
setback areas, which included construction of a new
foundation, repairing of rotting walls, replacing of doors
and windows, and adding an addition onto the northerly rear
side of the structure that came no closer to the lot lines
than the pre-existing structure had been sited. Should the
Board find that there had been a de facto demolition of the
structure, then the Applicant is seeking relief by
VARIANCE, in the alternative, under Nantucket Zoning By-law
Section 139-16A (Intensity Regulations - setbacks) to
validate the secondary dwelling as reconstructed on
substantially the same footprint, with the new addition.
The cottage is sited as close as about 8.5 feet from the
northwesterly rear yard lot line (if the frontage is taken
from Mill Street), and as close as about 2.1 feet from the
southwesterly side yard lot line (with a deck that is sited
at zero), and as close as about 6.0 feet from the front
yard lot line along Mill Street. For corner lots in the
Residential-1 zoning district side yard setbacks shall be
increased from five feet to ten feet from any abutting
street or way, whether constructed or not. The primary
dwelling is also nonconforming as to setbacks with the
structure being sited as close as about 5.4 feet from the
northwesterly rear yard lot line. The Locus is conforming
as to lot size, frontage and ground cover requirements.
The Premises is located at 27 MILL STREET, Assessor's
Map 55.4.4, Parcel 96, Land Court Plan 17877-0, Lot 3. The
property is zoned Residential-I.
2. Our Decision is based upon the Application and
accompanying materials and representations and testimony
received at our public hearing. The Planning Board made no
recommendation and indicated that this Application
presented no issues of planning concern. There was no
opposition presented in person at the public hearing.
There was a letter from the Applicant detailing her efforts
to obtain a Certificate of Occupancy and two letters and
one email in support from abutters in the file. One letter
stated that at no time did the abutter, Nancy Kaye at 16
New Mill Street, observe the ~tearing down of all four
walls" as she lived across the street from the Lot where
she ~can clearly see that dwelling". She also stated that
the nonconforming setback of the cottage had been affected
by heavy equipment utilizing accessing the area and eroding
the dirt road layout. Applicant also submitted a letter
from John H. Stover, P.E., of Stover Engineering
Associates, Inc., dated April 1, 2004, which stated that,
after his review of the structure and related documents, a
new foundation had been constructed under the entire
cottage and new addition, and it was his belief that:
The approved construction plans show the new
addition would be built by moving the north wall
7'0". Therefore, the then-existing north wall had
to be demolished and rebuilt on the new foundation
7' further north. The plans do not indicate any
reason why any of the other walls should have been
demolished, and we do not believe that they were.
However, it appears that much of the old structure
was in poor condition, requiring the replacement
or sistering of certain structural members.
The letter also states that the December 2001 HDC photos
indicate that the east, south and west walls were all
standing at the time, with new sheathing and studs where
necessary, causing a visible mix of old and new material.
He concludes his statement with the following:
By comparing the 1995 survey with the 2003 survey,
it is clear that the only wall that has moved is
the north wall, where the new addition was built.
Thus, the west, south and east walls are all in
their original positions, with a new CMU
foundation under them...The new foundation was
approved by both the HOC and the Building
Department. In summary, we believe that since none
of the walls has moved, and we have photos showing
a true and conscientious reconstruction of the
south wall, it would be impossible for anyone to
make an ex post facto case that any wall, other
than the north, was ever completely demolished.
3. Applicants, through counsel, represented that she was
seeking relief by Special Permit under Zoning By-Law
Section 139-33A to allow the alteration and extension of a
pre-existing nonconforming secondary dwelling located at
27 New Mill Street (the ~Premises"). By way of background,
the cottage on the Premises has existed at the Premises
since at least the 1930's and is clearly shown in its
present location on a 1938 and a 1957 aerial photograph in
the Town records. On the April 20, 1995 As-Built (the ~1995
Plan") approved by the Nantucket Building Department (the
~Building Department"), it is noted that the cottage pre-
dated zoning, thus making the setback nonconformities
grandfathered. The Applicant's predecessors-in-title
obtained Building Permit No. 611-01 dated May 31, 2001 (the
~Building Permit") from the Building Department to
construct a new foundation, a deck, and a 66 square-foot
addition on the northeasterly rear of the cottage. The
addition, as proposed in the Building Permit Application,
complied with current zoning requirements, being set
outside the 10-foot required setback area. The Zoning
Enforcement Officer (~ZEO") also approved the Building
Permit Application. In October 2003, the Applicant entered
into a Purchase and Sale Agreement to purchase the
Premises. In the course of her due diligence, the
Applicant's attorney reviewed the Building Department
records and inquired of the owner as to the status of the
renovation and the Building Permit. Although she
understood that a Certificate of Occupancy (the ~CO") had
not yet been issued for the Building Permit, the owner
informed her that the renovations were almost complete and
only the sign-offs remained. The Applicant also obtained
an As-Built plan of the Premises, titled ~Mortgage
Inspection Plan" (the ~Plan"), done by Jeffrey Blackwell of
Blackwell & Associates, Inc., dated November 7, 2003, and
revised March 17, 2004, a reduced copy of which is attached
hereto as Exhibit A. The Plan showed the cottage in
substantially the same location as the 1995 Plan, which was
consistent with the status of the cottage as a pre-existing
nonconforming structure. The Applicant purchased the
Premises on November 17, 2003. The agent of the previous
owner, who was also the individual responsible for the
renovations, was required by contract to obtain the CO.
When he had not obtained the CO by January 2004, the
Applicant proceeded to take action to obtain the CO. In
February 2004, the Applicant was informed that the Building
Department had received information that the previous owner
had, in violation of the Building Permit, demolished the
cottage in the course of his renovations and constructed an
addition approximately 46 square feet larger than had been
approved in the Building Permit and sited within the
northwesterly ten-foot setback area.
4. Applicant presented evidence at the hearing
demonstrating that the structure was not demolished, as
alleged by the Building Department, in spite of a
handwritten note on the outside of the Building Department
file. No action had been taken against the owner and no
~Stop Work Order" had ever been issued as a result of said
note, and work was allowed to continue to completion. The
Building Permit allowed the builder to put in a new
foundation under the existing structure, add windows to the
northeasterly and northwesterly walls and add windows and
doors to the southeasterly wall. In addition, the permit
allowed the addition of a deck/entry steps on the front
(southwesterly) side of the cottage and a 66 square foot
addition in the rear (northeasterly) side of the structure.
The new entry deck is smaller than the previous deck that
was shown on the 1995 Plan and the new deck eliminated the
encroachment of the older deck into the layout of Mill Hill
Lane. The addition in the rear of the cottage conformed
with the Zoning By-law requirements at the time of the
application for the Building Permit, as it was in the
buildable portion of the yard. The engineer, as stated
above, concluded that the northwesterly, southwesterly and
southeasterly walls had remained in their original
positions, and only the northeasterly wall, were the
addition was built, was ever demolished. In addition, the
Applicant submitted an Affidavit from the agent/builder,
William Cassidy, dated April 2, 2004, in which he stated
the following:
While I was constructing the foundation, I had
the cottage jacked up, poured the foundation
on the existing footprint and put the house
back Down on that footprint...ln undertaking to
add the windows on the east and west sides of
the cottage and the windows and door on the
south side, as permitted by the HDC and the
Building Permit, I took great pains to save
the existing studs. At not time during the
course of construction were the east, west
or south walls of the cottage demolished.
5. Applicant represented that two on-site parking spaces
would be provided on the Locus. The 1995 Plan showed that
there were two spaces on the Locus at that time. Applicant
will provide those spaces again. The Locus would also
continue to comply with ground cover and front yard setback
requirements.
6. Therefore, based upon the foregoing, the Board makes
the following findings:
(a) That based upon the letter submitted by Stover
Engineering, Inc. and testimony, both written and oral, the
renovations to the cottage did not constitute a demolition
to the point of loosing its grandfathered status as to
setback nonconformities; rather it was a renovation of an
existing structure.
(b) That the cottage on the Premises pre-exists the
1972 effective date of the Zoning By-law, and as such, its
violations of the required front, side and rear yard
setback requirements of the Zoning By-law are exempt from
enforcement as validly pre-existing nonconformities, and as
a result, the proposed alteration and extension of this
,.
'.
pre-existing nonconforming structure may be allowed by
Special Permit, and relief by Variance is not required,
with the latter relief being allowed, by unanimous vote, to
be withdrawn without prejudice, upon a request from the
Applicant.
(c) That the granting of a Special Permit to allow
the alteration and extension of the pre-existing
nonconforming structure on the Premises, including the
extension of such structures within the front, side and
rear yard setback areas, with such nonconforming setbacks
not being made more nonconforming, is not substantially
more detrimental to the neighborhood than the existing
nonconformities and a grant of relief would be in harmony
with the general purpose and intent of the Zoning By-law.
7. Accordingly, by UNANIMOUS vote, the Board of Appeals
GRANTS the requested relief by SPECIAL PERMIT under
Nantucket Zoning By-law Section 139-33.A, to ratify the
existing alteration and extension of the pre-existing
nonconforming cottage on the Locus, including the extension
of such structure within the side yard setbacks with the
construction of the addition, with such nonconforming
setbacks not being made more nonconforming, subject to the
following condition:
a. The Premises and structures contained thereon
shall remain configured substantially as shown on Exhibit
A, unless further relief from this Board is granted.
Dated: June q ,2004
Michael
Edward Murphy
David R. Wiley
[.e- ~ ~
Edward J. Sanford
. .
IOIIN6 CLASSIFICATION: R-I
MIN. MfA:. . . ?OP.Q . S'.~. .
MIN. FRONTAGE: . . ),0. rr . .
FRONT YMD S.B.: . . ~o. fT . .
REAR &: SIDE S.B.: . . ~ .fT. . .
GROUND COVER (X): . ~. . (.'.
/
W
\..J
~
t)
..J
-1
~
PRoPOSED
pARKI"'C;
6PAC~
E)(IsnNG:
. . .~Q-:I~.~'F. or
SEE 'PLAN
. . ... . . .
II II
. . ; . . . ii'
: :;?'l : : ~ :%
c~ ft
ONLY ORIGINALLY STAMPED AND
ENDORSED COPIES OF THIS PlAN
SHALL BE ACKNOWLEDGED BY
TH~. CERTIFYING lAND SURVEYOR. .
55".4./ - '?G./
t-t/F
GERon 'r' FIELD
'WILU TOBIAS FJELl~
C;;9.3'3
:?:.~
'>
\..l-l
:z
~\0--
INOT TO BE RECORDED I
UNDE.R~ROLJI-/D
UTIi..lTY 1:ASEME}...(T
~. 53745
-...J
-...J
-...
TO: .\1f;~~S. . FA~q .1f9t1/'f-. tv(OJi~:-rr;AG-.E. .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . AND NO OTHERS.
I CERTIFY, TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWlEDGE, THAT THE
PREMISES SHOWN ARE LOCATED IN FLOOD HAZARD ZONE:
. . .c. . . , DELINEATED ON F.I.R.M. / COMMUNITY PANEL
NUI.lBER: 250230-00 . J.l. . . . 0, BY THE FEDERAL
EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY. EFFECTIVE DATE OF
MAPS; JUNE 3, 1986 AND AS PERIODICALLY REVISED.
THIS INSPECTION PlAN WAS PREPMED FOR MORTGAGE PURPOSES
ONlY AND IS NOT TO BE CONSIDERED A FULL INSTRIJI.IENT SURVEY.
lHS PlAN SHOUlD NOT BE USED TO ESTA@USH PROPERTY U~.
FENCES, OOlGES OR 1& ANCIlliRY STRUClURES ON THE PREMISES.
THE PROPERTY LINES SHOWN RELY ON CURRENT DEEDS AND PlANS
OF RECORD.
nus lNSPECl1QN PlAN IS NOT A CERTIFICATION AS TO THE TITLE OR
OWNERSHIP OF THE PROPERTY SHOWN. OWNERS Of ADJOINING PROPERTIES
ARE SHOWN ACCORDING TO CURRENT TOWN OF NANTUCKET ASSESSOR
RECORDS.
THIS PlAN SHALL NOT BE USED FOR ANY OTHER PURPOSE OTHER THAN
ITS INTENDED USE STATED ABOVE.
@Illackwell " Associales Inc.
r.' rnDl#t. aa\ U'DII
I--
W
0.J
t
U)
~
\--t\\...\...
'-4 N E
Owner:
~@~IJ@l&@l[g
~~~~[g@iO@~ ~&~
DIfil
~&~li'l1:!J@J({[gli' B ~@@.
REVISED: 3-17- 04
SCALE: r = zoo DATE: NOv', 7) l. 00'3
. P~1?9RA~. ANP~9Qlj. . . .
. .. . ., ..... ... ... 't...CT'3 . . . .
DeedjCert.: .C~J?r: f(9'f1:4. Plan: L.~..17~77~ 1;:>. . .
<I'
Tax Mop: .5~.:4:4: .9~ Locus: .2.:7. . 0!LL. ~~'. .
FBK.:
BLACKWELL & ASSOCIATES, Inc.
P-roJessional. Land SUTVey01'S
6 Young's Way
Na.nt'UCket, Massa.chusetts Of554
"47 -134 (508) 228-9026 B- G 227
TOWN OF NANTUCKET
ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
1 EAST CHESTNUT STREET
NANTUCKET, MASSACHUSETTS 02554
PHONE 508-228-7215
FAX 508-228-7205
NOTICE
A Public Hearing of the NANTUCKET ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS will be held at
1:00 P .M., FRIDAY, APRIL 2, 2004 in the Conference Room, Town Annex Building,
37 Washington Street, Nantucket, Massachusetts, on the Application of the following:
DEBORAH ANDERSON
BOARD OF APPEALS FILE NO. 025-04
Applicant is seeking relief by SPECIAL PERMIT under Nantucket Zoning By-
law Section 139-33A (alteration/expansion ofa pre-existing/nonconforming
structure/use). Applicant is asking the Board to allow the alteration and extension of a
pre-existing nonconforming secondary dwelling. In the event it is determined that the
renovations to the cottage did not amount to a demolition and the cottage retained its
grandfathered status as to setbacks, the Applicant is now requesting relief under this
section to regularize the alterations already undertaken and completed within the required
side/rear and front yard setback areas, which included construction of a new foundation,
repairing of rotting walls, replacing of doors and windows, and adding an addition onto
the northerly rear side of the structure that came no closer to the lot lines than the pre-
existing structure had been sited. Should the Board fmd that there had been a de facto
demolition of the structure, then the Applicant is seeking relief by VARIANCE, in the
alternative, under Nantucket Zoning By-law Section 139-16A (Intensity Regulations-
setbacks) to validate the secondary dwelling as reconstructed on substantially the same
footprint, with the new addition. The cottage is sited as close as about 8.5 feet from the
northwesterly rear yard lot line (if the frontage is taken from Mill Street), and as close as
about 2.1 feet from the southwesterly side yard lot line (with a deck that is sited at zero),
and as close as about 6.0 feet from the front yard lot line along Mill Street. For comer lots
in the Residential-1 District side yard setbacks shall be increased from five feet to ten feet
from any abutting street or way, whether constructed or not. The primary dwelling is also
nonconforming as to setbacks with the structure being sited as close as about 5.4 feet
from the northwesterly rear yard lot line. The Locus is conforming as to lot size, frontage
and ground cover requirements.
The Premises is located at 27 MILL STREET, Assessor's Map 55.4.4, Parcel 96,
Land Court Plan 17877-D, Lot 3. The property is zoned Residential-I.
/-,1;( (l~. (~ [eu'tt
Nancy J. Sevre , hairman
TillS NOTICE IS AVAILABLE IN LARGE PRINT OR OTHER
ALTERNATIVE FORMATS. PLEASE CALL 508-228-7215 FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION.
NANTUCKET ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
1 EAST CHESTNUT STREET
NANTUCKET, MA 02554
CASE No6c>s-=-o <I
FEE: $300.00
APPLICATION FOR RELIEF
Owner's name(s): Deborah Anderson
Mailing address: 27 Mill Street" Nantucket, Massachusetts 02554
Applicant's name(s): Same
Mailing address: Same
Locus address: 27 Mill Street" Nantucket, Massachusetts 02554
Assessor's Map/Parcel: Map 55.4.4, Parcel 96
Land Court Plan/Plan Book & Page/Plan File No.: Plan 17877-D, Lot 3
Date lot acquired: 11/17/03 Deed Ref./Cert. of Title: 20,994 Zoning District: R-l
Uses on Lot - Commercial: None X Yes (describe)
Residential: Number of dwellings 2 Duplex_ Apartments_Rental Rooms
Building Date(s): All pre-date 7/72? yes C ofO(s)?All CO's issued except CO for Permit No. 611-01.
Building Permit Nos:
Previous Zoning Board Application Nos.:
State below or on a separate addendum specific relief sought (Special Permit, Variance, Appeal), Section of
the Zoning By-law, and supporting details, grounds for grant of relief, listing any existing nonconformities:
See Addendum attached.
d
A
,:~!J
::3:
:I::>
::u
01
v
I certify that the in~ r
knowledge, undevtl
I
I
ntained herein is substantially complete and true to the best of my
d penalties of perjury.
SIGNATURE. ~/ Applicant Attorney/Agent ~
(If not owner s torney, please enclose pro \ of agency to bring this matt 'before the Board)
(Ad FO FICE USE
Application received on:Jj10Q.l By: Complete: ,. Need copies?: :
Filed with Town Clerk:2J((P1Q't1'l.nll;"gB6~BUildingDept.: - I I ~: (f2<;J
Fee deposited with Town Treasurer:s3..r/!iP-f!fBY:. ., aiver requested?:_Granted:_/~-----;
Hearing notice posted with Town Clerk: 3/KQI cffM:ailed::SljJjJj&M:-3I{2JQ!/&3J2)'-; O~
Hearing(s) held on:~~_ Opened on:~_I_ Continued to:_I_I_ Withdr~wn?:_/~_
DECISION DUE BY: I I Made: I I Filed wIT own Clerk: I I Mailed: I I
--- --- --- ---
DECISION APPEALED?: I I SUPERIOR COURT: LAND COURT Form 4/03/03
---
ADDENDUM
Assessor's Map 55.4.4,Parcel 96
Certificate of Title No. 20,994
Plan No. 17887-D, Lot 3
27 Mill Street
Residential-1
The Applicant seeks relief by Special Permit under the
Nantucket Zoning By-law (the "By-law") ~139-33-A
(al teration/ expansion of a pre-existing non-conforming
structure/use) to allow the alteration and extension of a
pre-existing non-conforming structure on the property
located at 27 Mill Street, Nantucket, Massachusetts (the
"Premises") . The renovations included building a
foundation, repairing rotting walls, replacing the front
door and windows and, with respect to the addition in the
back, extending the westerly line of the building. All of
the alterations and extensions are minimal, and none of
them are more detrimental to the neighborhood than the
existing non-conformities.
By way of background, the cottage on the Premises has
existed at the Premises since at least the 1950' s and is
shown in aerial photographs dating back to that time. On a
1995 As-Built (see attached) approved by the Nantucket
Building Department (the "Building Department"), it is
noted that the cottage predates zoning. The Applicant's
predecessors in title obtained a building permit (No. 611-
01) dated May 31, 2001 (the "Building Permit") from the
Building Department to construct a new foundation, a deck,
and a 66 square foot addition on the back of the cottage.
The addition, as proposed at that time in the Building
Permit, complied with current zoning requirements being
located outside the 10-foot setback areas. However, the
size of the addition was increased and a small portion of
which was sited wi thin said setback area though no closer
than the existing structures, and not bringing the total
ground cover on the Lot over the maximum allowable of 30%.
The Zoning Enforcement Officer also approved the Building
Permit Application. In October 2003, the Applicant entered
into a Purchase and Sale Agreement to purchase the
Premises. In the course of her due diligence, the
Applicant's attorney reviewed the Building Department
records and inquired of the owner as to the status of the
renovation and the Building Permit. Al though she
understood that a Certificate of Occupancy (the "CO") had
not yet been issued for the Building Permit, the owner
informed her that the renovations were almost complete and
only the sign-offs remained. The Applicant also obtained
an As-Built plan of the Premises (the ~Plan") (see
attached) . The Plan showed the cottage in the same
location as the 1995 As-Built, which was consistent with
the status of the cottage as a pre-existing non-conforming
structure. The Applicant purchased the Premises on
November 17, 2003. The agent of the previous owner was
required by contract to obtain the CO. When he had not
obtained the CO by January 2004, the Applicant proceeded to
take action to obtain the co. In February 2004, the
Applicant was informed that the Building Department had
received information that the previous owner had, in
violation of the Building Permit, demolished the cottage in
the course of his renovations. Although the cottage
remains on its previous footprint, arguably it may have
lost its grandfathered status as a pre-existing,
nonconforming structure as a result of the alleged
demolition.
In the alternative, the Applicant is seeking Variance
under the Nantucket Zoning By-law the ("By-law") ~139-16
(Intensity Regulations) to regularize the alterations and
extensions undertaken within the zoning setbacks in the
event it is determined that the renovations to the cottage
amounted to a demolition, and the cottage lost its
grandfathered status. The Premises is located in the R-1
District and is considered a corner lot as it is bounded on
three sides by streets, New Mill Street to the west, Mill
Hill to the south, and Mill Street to the east. Corner
lots in the R-1 District are required to maintain side yard
setback of 10 feet from any abutting street or way, whether
or not constructed. The cottage is approximately 8.5 feet
from New Mill Street on the northwest, and approximately
6.0 feet at it closest point from Mill Street on the
southeast. The cottage has approximately zero side yard
setback from Mill Hill on the southwest. As a result, the
Applicant is seeking relief to regularize the existence of
the cottage wi thin the setbacks. Owing to the
circumstances relating to the shape of the land and the
location of the dwellings, a literal enforcement of the
provisions of the By-law would involve a substantial
hardship to the Applicant. The variance relief requested
would bring the Premises into compliance with the By-law
without substantial detriment to the public good.
/
"'.? 1
.) ,.
.)
,. \J'
-;(., bD
~
-Z <::l"
~ ?-]"'
~
~
~EvJ
Ibt;,SO
~,
~;
~~
M\ \-\,
?1'~e.~,:f
..9\
~,\s
rt')
N'l
~
..9
'\.01..
-- -
MILL
ST/:'E/::r
{VOTE ~ eorrl1-t;..E
,A/5.()RrE~ i!O~/#~
~~~[pd~w~,rQ)
THE STRUCTURES SHOWN
ZONING: ~-I
MINIMUM LOT SIZE 5';000 61~
MINIMUM FRONTAGE: SO'
FRONT YARD SETBACK :10'
REAR & SIDE SETBACK:Sr
GROUND COVER RATIO: 30 t'
PLOT PLAN OF LAND IN
NANTUCKET, MASS.
ri~i'i~1-'UC~';:~~f GlElDH'!]G [~ ~.
~;?~~ !'15?S
,
SCALE 1" = ;;"D
_ ,,,_r
v~/~~/~vv~ ~~.~~ rfiA ~VO~'O~,~,
..
lDIII& CLASSIFICATlal: R-I
t.ItN. AAfA:. . . ~9P.Q ,~..Fj. .
Wtl. FRONTAt;E: . . SP. rr.. . .
fRONT YAAD S.B.: . . ~o. r:r; . .
REAR & SIDE S.B.: . .~.FT. . .
GROUNO COVER (X): . ~. . 7..
EXIST1NG:
. . . ~Q-:1:7. S.F. ~
. ~~E; . ~L!:'"
II .,
. .. . ....
. .,
: :~'7.: :~:*
'l!dU",
\,
ONlY ORIGINAllY STAMPED AND
ENDORSED COPIES OF THIS PlAN
SI-W.L BE ACKNOWLEDGED BY
THE CERTIFYING lAND SURVEYOR.
55.4./- ")G./
tJ/F
GE'KOD ~. F/EL.D
'WILLI TOBIAS FJELD
. (.;9. ~'3
C'HLAR\oIAY~:
U'
w
w
~
I-
If)
-1
-l
~ ~
\ci
Q
...)
-.J
-
'> ~
\J..l
:J.
"^ \ \.J-.
TO: . \{;:L;.k;S. . f4~q . Jf9~~. Mo,li:,rrrAG-.E. .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . AND NO OTtIIERS.
I CERTIFY. TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE, THAT THE I
PRENlSES SHOWN ARE LOCATED IN FLOOO HAZARD ZONE:
. . . ~ . . . ()(UNEA TED ON t.!. R.M. / COllllUNrTY PANEL
NUMBER: 250230-00 . 1.1. . . . 0, Frf 1HE FEDERAL
EMERGENCY ilANACEMENT AGENCY. EfFECTPJE DATE Of
lW'S: JUNE 3, 1986 AND AS PERlOOICAU.Y REVISED.
THIS INSPECTION PlAN WAS PREPAAED FOIl MORTGAGE PURPOSES
ONLY AND IS NOT TO BE CONSIDERED A F\JI..l lNS'TRUWENT SURVEY.
TItS PlAN SHOULD NOT BE USED m fSTABUSH PROPERlY UNES.
F'ENCES. HEDGES OR NlY ANCIU.ARY .sTRUCJURES ON THE PREIIISES.
THE PROPERTY LINES SHOWN RELY ON CURRENT DEEDS AND PlANS
OF RECORD. .
THIS INSPECTION PlAN IS NOT A CERTIFICATION AS TO lHE TITLE OR
OWNERSHIP OF THE PROPERTY SHOWN. OWNERS Of ADJOINING PROPERTIES
AAf. SliM ACCORDING TO CURRENT TOWN OF NANTUCKET ASSESSOR
M~~. .
lllIS PlAN SHALL NOT BE USED FOR Nf( OTHER PURPOSE OTHER THAN
ITS INTENDED USE STATED ABOVE.
INOT TO BE RECORDED I
~@~li@J&@~
U~~~~@ijj]@~ ~[L&~
IIJil
~~~D ~~. ,
SCALE; 1.:: ZOo DATE: NOI/. 7,200'3
Ownt:r: . ~~~~1:-<. .A~p~~J.,{. . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 'LOT '3' . . . .
Deec;jCert.: .q~ ~9"f)4. PIon: L~..17~77:-l;). . .
.
Tax Mop: .5?:4:4: .'1~ Locus: .2:7. . ~!L.L. ~-r:-.. . .
FBK.:
BLACKWELL d: ASSOCIATES, Inc.
PrD/asiaRGl Land Svrwyors
6 Young's relY
Na:niu.clcet. Massachusetts 02554
~:7-r.34 (508) 228-9026 B- GZ27
51-
el.TItOLIC ClilIlTCIIlV
d
o
o
.;
~
1&.1 N 101 000.
REVIS I N
D"'E ,"",en
COMPI~~:;~'f~~~I:HOWN HfREO~ WA$
~NO PlAI"4S Of' REeOROL PHOTOGItAPHS, OEms.
_..__..n .. ......:._".~.~.~~.~ TO IE
~,:t
..
..
:z
.. ..
.J ~
\
OAf( '''ltcn
rrhe rnn'
NAN'
1\In
A ~.......... .
I 1I111.1'1_111"1~lliL
-..,
~
\!~
If
., Q. (v
.11 0 ._--~-
'\
Town of Nantucket
ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
LIST OF PARTIES IN INTEREST IN THE MATIER OF TIlE PETITION OF
" !
"-,,_" c\ .. ." 1 "7 Cr'
PRO PER TY.o wrjER... .. -A.&.b.~ .r.~. h. ..%'.\.\0.. . 0 .\X.?'Q. ~--:1.. .-:-.l..T:'J. u. oS .y.0. C \ e 1-(
MAILING ADDRESS...........................:...................................... .....
. <') ~ '.h II -f
PROPERTY LOCATION,...... ..c:7..:1:,... .1. ../...... .J......;.......................
. . ;: 5 5'-1 <-I 9 to
ASSESSORS MAPfPARCEL:., ...... .., .......-:. ... ... ............... ,.. ......... ... ......
1 I \
rl/ll) .
APPLICANT....,......................................................................,...... ..
SEE ATIACHED PAGES
I certify that the foregoing is a list of persons who are owners of abutting property, owners of
land directl;- opposite on any public or private street or way; and abutter.s of the abutters and all
other land owners within 300 feet of the. property line of owner's property, all as they appear ~:>n
the most recent applicable tax list (M.G.L. c. 40A, Section 11 Zoning Code Chapter 139.
Section l39-29D (2) ..
lpl /, ( . "/
'::./, ~ l.~ . t. .!. .c.9 .C:.c:.'-
/"
( .... .'
! I ;' /. .
I.'. / l l )l 1/ .r'-\ /.
.~ "M.. it" ,.. v
. .1. ;::;{/:: . . . ",;';,,;:-:-!. (, . . . ,~- .
ASSESSOR'S OFFICE
Town of Nantucket
/
DATE'
<'
~
.....
,~
"-
N
o
o
o
-.l
N
>-'
"'
3:
"'
III
<0
<1>
>-'
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ g
~ ~ ~ . . ~ ~ ~ ~ . . ~ . ~ . ~ . ~ . . ~ . . ~ . . . ~ . . ~ . ~ ~ . ~ . .
'" ,...
,...
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 00 00 00 ~ CD m 00 m 00 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ m ~ m m ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ W W W ~ W W ~
~ m m ~ . W ~ ~ 0 ~ ~ m ~ ~ m W ~ ~ ~ . W N ~ ~ m ~ 0 m m . W N ~ ~ W ~ ~ ~ ~ 0
0\" rt
'" ,...
,...
,...
~ 5 a
~ s
~ ~ ~
~ >< g
>1 t' ::c
n
~
"l
l'l
~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ; ~ ~ ~ ~ e e ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ! ~ ~ I ~ I ~ ~ e
~ s ~ ~ ~ B B B ~ ~ ! ~ a ~ S ~ ~ i ~ : ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ : ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ n ~ ~ n ~ >< e ~ ! HI ~ ~ ~ @ ~ ; g ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
III lnl n ~ e ~ ~ ~ g ~ ~ ~ >< ~ ~ ~ ~ >: "' t.i H ~ ~ ~ H ~ l'l ~ : ~
l'l C ~ a '" ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 ::c ~ > l'l ~ ~ ~ g g t' t' l'l ~
~ :: ~ : ~ ~ ~ : ~ i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ >< ~ ~ ~ ~t! l'l : : ~ ~I ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ : l'l > ~ ~ ~: ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a
....a ~ ~>HI ~~..- ~ ~n~t4><!ii '"
~ >< ~ ~ ie~ ~ ~~l'l>E ~ : ~
~ !;l!:l ~!'l '" >: ~ "l
'" III HI
> > ~
'"
CD
n n
"- "-
o 0
n n
~ ~
>< ><
it
HI
~
'"
HI
i!i
~
'"
tl
~
~
~
~
tll
'"
~
l'l
n
HI
'"
HI
~
~
i!i
Ui
l'l
HI
~
'"
HI
'"
HI
~
HI
><
HI
~
'"
HI
~
!;l
~ .... CD .... W
0\ '" 0\
~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ i!i ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~
t':l
~ ~ ~ . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
tl 0
~ ~ : ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~
E ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ i!i
w HI ~ ! HI ~ '" '" ~
~~t':l~ ~~~
'" ~
~
l'l
HI
0\ 6
~ ~ i!i
'" 0 ~
t-3 ~ ~
~ ~
tl n
i ~
: i
i a
~ ~
'" n
HI
n
"-
o
~
III
....
t'
....
~
n
n
"-
o
~
'"
llJ
t4
~
~
tl
gJ
~
~ I I
>: ><
~ ~
II! l'l l'l ~
~ ~ ~ m
~ ~ ~ ~
[Ii l'l III >:
~ ~Ul i
t;; "l "l
~ ~ ~ : :
>: ~
~ ~ 8 8
'" tll tll
HI HI
.. ..
>< ><
::c ::c
8
n
><
~ ~ ~
~ .... n
~ ~ 6
~ ~ ~
~ ~ !
~ fil ~
~ '" ~
HI '"
'"
>: >
!f
~
'"
HI
~ '"
~ I
\C .... .... w .... .... I-' ~
mOl\) .... .... ~
~~"II@i!ii!i =
~~ ~~~~ m
o m H H
~ : '" ~ ~ ~ ~
HI ~ i!l ~ ~
~ t;;
~
'"
S
!:l
~
S
n '"
SIC
'"
l'l ....
'"
l'l
; I !~ i i ~ ~ ~ i ~ I I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ I I I ~ I ~ ~ ~ i I~ ~ ; ; I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I ~
~ Q ~ ~ ~ III ~ tll ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ '" ~ tl ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ _ ~ ~ H~~ ~ Q ~ H ~ ~ ~ ~ H H H H ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
&l ~1.l i'J ~ ><
g ~ ~
o
0\
CD
...,
o
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ g
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ g ~ ~
'"
~
'"
CD
'"
o 0 0 woo 0 0 0 ~ 0 0 0 0 000 0 0
~ ~ ~ 0 ~ ~ w ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ m ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ . ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 ~ 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
. ~ N ~ . . ~ W . Nom . . . . . 0 .
,... ~ w
'"
I ~
'"
~ ~
~
~ ~ ~
'" III ~
~ ~ ~
~ ~
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~
OOOOOOONOOO.....OOOOOOO N
NNN....NNNNNN.....ONNNNNNN ....
O'lOu.~lnlnlJl"-1....U1CDOlJllJ1U1U1lJ1U1111 'd
W ~ lJI In UI In U1 . W UI ~ ..... U1 In lJ1 1JI In UI UI
.... 0 . N . . . O'l 0 . 0 . . . . . . . .
I\) ..... .... N ~ I\) '" '" N .... N ..... .... .... O'l ..... ..... w ..... .... N .... ~ . w w .... .... ..... ~ .... .... ....
. O'l m m ~ O'l lJI W ~ ..... ~ lJ1.... In 0 ~ m O'l .... . ~ ~ ~ I\) .....
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ : ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ HI ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ HI HI ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ HI ~
"'''' HI HI HI HI HI HI HI ~t<HI HI '" ~~ ",HI HI
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
\D ..... o,.J .... .....
0\ CD 0
~ ~ ~ ~ ~
a ~ ~ ~ ~
~ fil fil ~
'" '" HI
HI HI
........ ~
~ ~ ~
~ ~ ....
III III b
.... .... 0
~ ~ III
p:
~ ~ g
II!
....
o
~
'&
,..
rt
n
o
~
H
I
m
>:
i
-----
~
~~
~~
~(J)
1-3t"i
H
(J)
~~
l2:
Iil