Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout025-04 TOWN OF NANTUCKET BOARD OF APPEALS NANTUCKET, MASSACHUSEITS 02554 Date: j U'fle.-.- 9 , 200t.{ To: Parties in Interest and. Others concerned with the Decision of the BOARD OF APPEALS in the Application of the following: Application No.: bwner/Applicant: o G~-O 4- D-e \ocYU h ~n &.0LS'C){) Enclosed is the Decision of the BOARD OF APPEALS which has this day been filed in the office of the Nantucket Town Clerk. An Appeal from this Decision may be taken pursuant to Section 17 of Chapter 40A, Massachusetts General L~~. c. d A ......... "- Any'action appealing the Decision must be brought ~y ~ filing an complaint in court within TWENTY (20) days afte~ this day's date. Notice of the action with a copy or the complaint and certified copy of the Decision must be giveE8 to the Town Clerk so as to be received within such TWENTY~ (20) days. \okJ6A \ S;~ r\)()JV\ ~ \J, JQ.~ Cbairman cc: Town Clerk Planning Board Building Commissioner PLEASE NOTE: MOST SPECIAL PERMITS AND VARIANCES HAVE A TIME LIMIT AND WILL EXPIRE IF NOT ACTED UPON ACCORDING'TO NANTUCKET ZONING BY-LAW ~139-30I (SPECIAL PERMITS); ~139-32I (VARIANCES) I ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE CALL THE NANTUCKET ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS. ~ NANTUCKET ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS 37 Washington Street Nantucket, Massachusetts 02554 Assessor's Map 55.4.4 Parcel 96 27 Mill Street Residential-1 Certificate of Title No. 20,994 Certificate of Title No.20,994 Plan No.17887-D, Lot 3 DECISION: At a Public Hearing of the Nantucket Zoning Board of Appeals, on Friday April 2, 2004, at 1:00 P.M. in the Conference Room, Town Annex Building, 37 Washington Street, Nantucket, Massachusetts, the Board made the following Decision on the Application of DEBORAH ANDERSON, Owner, of 27 Mill Street, Nantucket, Massachusetts 02554, File No. 025-04. 1. Applicant is seeking relief by SPECIAL PERMIT under Nantucket Zoning By-law Section 139-33A (alteration/expansion of a pre-existing/nonconforming structure/use). Applicant is asking the Board to allow the alteration and extension of a pre-existing nonconforming secondary dwelling. In the event it is determined that the renovations to the cottage did not amount to a demolition and the cottage retained its grandfathered status as to setbacks, the Applicant is now requesting relief under this section to regularize the alterations already undertaken and completed within the required side/rear and front yard setback areas, which included construction of a new foundation, repairing of rotting walls, replacing of doors and windows, and adding an addition onto the northerly rear side of the structure that came no closer to the lot lines than the pre-existing structure had been sited. Should the Board find that there had been a de facto demolition of the structure, then the Applicant is seeking relief by VARIANCE, in the alternative, under Nantucket Zoning By-law Section 139-16A (Intensity Regulations - setbacks) to validate the secondary dwelling as reconstructed on substantially the same footprint, with the new addition. The cottage is sited as close as about 8.5 feet from the northwesterly rear yard lot line (if the frontage is taken from Mill Street), and as close as about 2.1 feet from the southwesterly side yard lot line (with a deck that is sited at zero), and as close as about 6.0 feet from the front yard lot line along Mill Street. For corner lots in the Residential-1 zoning district side yard setbacks shall be increased from five feet to ten feet from any abutting street or way, whether constructed or not. The primary dwelling is also nonconforming as to setbacks with the structure being sited as close as about 5.4 feet from the northwesterly rear yard lot line. The Locus is conforming as to lot size, frontage and ground cover requirements. The Premises is located at 27 MILL STREET, Assessor's Map 55.4.4, Parcel 96, Land Court Plan 17877-0, Lot 3. The property is zoned Residential-I. 2. Our Decision is based upon the Application and accompanying materials and representations and testimony received at our public hearing. The Planning Board made no recommendation and indicated that this Application presented no issues of planning concern. There was no opposition presented in person at the public hearing. There was a letter from the Applicant detailing her efforts to obtain a Certificate of Occupancy and two letters and one email in support from abutters in the file. One letter stated that at no time did the abutter, Nancy Kaye at 16 New Mill Street, observe the ~tearing down of all four walls" as she lived across the street from the Lot where she ~can clearly see that dwelling". She also stated that the nonconforming setback of the cottage had been affected by heavy equipment utilizing accessing the area and eroding the dirt road layout. Applicant also submitted a letter from John H. Stover, P.E., of Stover Engineering Associates, Inc., dated April 1, 2004, which stated that, after his review of the structure and related documents, a new foundation had been constructed under the entire cottage and new addition, and it was his belief that: The approved construction plans show the new addition would be built by moving the north wall 7'0". Therefore, the then-existing north wall had to be demolished and rebuilt on the new foundation 7' further north. The plans do not indicate any reason why any of the other walls should have been demolished, and we do not believe that they were. However, it appears that much of the old structure was in poor condition, requiring the replacement or sistering of certain structural members. The letter also states that the December 2001 HDC photos indicate that the east, south and west walls were all standing at the time, with new sheathing and studs where necessary, causing a visible mix of old and new material. He concludes his statement with the following: By comparing the 1995 survey with the 2003 survey, it is clear that the only wall that has moved is the north wall, where the new addition was built. Thus, the west, south and east walls are all in their original positions, with a new CMU foundation under them...The new foundation was approved by both the HOC and the Building Department. In summary, we believe that since none of the walls has moved, and we have photos showing a true and conscientious reconstruction of the south wall, it would be impossible for anyone to make an ex post facto case that any wall, other than the north, was ever completely demolished. 3. Applicants, through counsel, represented that she was seeking relief by Special Permit under Zoning By-Law Section 139-33A to allow the alteration and extension of a pre-existing nonconforming secondary dwelling located at 27 New Mill Street (the ~Premises"). By way of background, the cottage on the Premises has existed at the Premises since at least the 1930's and is clearly shown in its present location on a 1938 and a 1957 aerial photograph in the Town records. On the April 20, 1995 As-Built (the ~1995 Plan") approved by the Nantucket Building Department (the ~Building Department"), it is noted that the cottage pre- dated zoning, thus making the setback nonconformities grandfathered. The Applicant's predecessors-in-title obtained Building Permit No. 611-01 dated May 31, 2001 (the ~Building Permit") from the Building Department to construct a new foundation, a deck, and a 66 square-foot addition on the northeasterly rear of the cottage. The addition, as proposed in the Building Permit Application, complied with current zoning requirements, being set outside the 10-foot required setback area. The Zoning Enforcement Officer (~ZEO") also approved the Building Permit Application. In October 2003, the Applicant entered into a Purchase and Sale Agreement to purchase the Premises. In the course of her due diligence, the Applicant's attorney reviewed the Building Department records and inquired of the owner as to the status of the renovation and the Building Permit. Although she understood that a Certificate of Occupancy (the ~CO") had not yet been issued for the Building Permit, the owner informed her that the renovations were almost complete and only the sign-offs remained. The Applicant also obtained an As-Built plan of the Premises, titled ~Mortgage Inspection Plan" (the ~Plan"), done by Jeffrey Blackwell of Blackwell & Associates, Inc., dated November 7, 2003, and revised March 17, 2004, a reduced copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit A. The Plan showed the cottage in substantially the same location as the 1995 Plan, which was consistent with the status of the cottage as a pre-existing nonconforming structure. The Applicant purchased the Premises on November 17, 2003. The agent of the previous owner, who was also the individual responsible for the renovations, was required by contract to obtain the CO. When he had not obtained the CO by January 2004, the Applicant proceeded to take action to obtain the CO. In February 2004, the Applicant was informed that the Building Department had received information that the previous owner had, in violation of the Building Permit, demolished the cottage in the course of his renovations and constructed an addition approximately 46 square feet larger than had been approved in the Building Permit and sited within the northwesterly ten-foot setback area. 4. Applicant presented evidence at the hearing demonstrating that the structure was not demolished, as alleged by the Building Department, in spite of a handwritten note on the outside of the Building Department file. No action had been taken against the owner and no ~Stop Work Order" had ever been issued as a result of said note, and work was allowed to continue to completion. The Building Permit allowed the builder to put in a new foundation under the existing structure, add windows to the northeasterly and northwesterly walls and add windows and doors to the southeasterly wall. In addition, the permit allowed the addition of a deck/entry steps on the front (southwesterly) side of the cottage and a 66 square foot addition in the rear (northeasterly) side of the structure. The new entry deck is smaller than the previous deck that was shown on the 1995 Plan and the new deck eliminated the encroachment of the older deck into the layout of Mill Hill Lane. The addition in the rear of the cottage conformed with the Zoning By-law requirements at the time of the application for the Building Permit, as it was in the buildable portion of the yard. The engineer, as stated above, concluded that the northwesterly, southwesterly and southeasterly walls had remained in their original positions, and only the northeasterly wall, were the addition was built, was ever demolished. In addition, the Applicant submitted an Affidavit from the agent/builder, William Cassidy, dated April 2, 2004, in which he stated the following: While I was constructing the foundation, I had the cottage jacked up, poured the foundation on the existing footprint and put the house back Down on that footprint...ln undertaking to add the windows on the east and west sides of the cottage and the windows and door on the south side, as permitted by the HDC and the Building Permit, I took great pains to save the existing studs. At not time during the course of construction were the east, west or south walls of the cottage demolished. 5. Applicant represented that two on-site parking spaces would be provided on the Locus. The 1995 Plan showed that there were two spaces on the Locus at that time. Applicant will provide those spaces again. The Locus would also continue to comply with ground cover and front yard setback requirements. 6. Therefore, based upon the foregoing, the Board makes the following findings: (a) That based upon the letter submitted by Stover Engineering, Inc. and testimony, both written and oral, the renovations to the cottage did not constitute a demolition to the point of loosing its grandfathered status as to setback nonconformities; rather it was a renovation of an existing structure. (b) That the cottage on the Premises pre-exists the 1972 effective date of the Zoning By-law, and as such, its violations of the required front, side and rear yard setback requirements of the Zoning By-law are exempt from enforcement as validly pre-existing nonconformities, and as a result, the proposed alteration and extension of this ,. '. pre-existing nonconforming structure may be allowed by Special Permit, and relief by Variance is not required, with the latter relief being allowed, by unanimous vote, to be withdrawn without prejudice, upon a request from the Applicant. (c) That the granting of a Special Permit to allow the alteration and extension of the pre-existing nonconforming structure on the Premises, including the extension of such structures within the front, side and rear yard setback areas, with such nonconforming setbacks not being made more nonconforming, is not substantially more detrimental to the neighborhood than the existing nonconformities and a grant of relief would be in harmony with the general purpose and intent of the Zoning By-law. 7. Accordingly, by UNANIMOUS vote, the Board of Appeals GRANTS the requested relief by SPECIAL PERMIT under Nantucket Zoning By-law Section 139-33.A, to ratify the existing alteration and extension of the pre-existing nonconforming cottage on the Locus, including the extension of such structure within the side yard setbacks with the construction of the addition, with such nonconforming setbacks not being made more nonconforming, subject to the following condition: a. The Premises and structures contained thereon shall remain configured substantially as shown on Exhibit A, unless further relief from this Board is granted. Dated: June q ,2004 Michael Edward Murphy David R. Wiley [.e- ~ ~ Edward J. Sanford . . IOIIN6 CLASSIFICATION: R-I MIN. MfA:. . . ?OP.Q . S'.~. . MIN. FRONTAGE: . . ),0. rr . . FRONT YMD S.B.: . . ~o. fT . . REAR &: SIDE S.B.: . . ~ .fT. . . GROUND COVER (X): . ~. . (.'. / W \..J ~ t) ..J -1 ~ PRoPOSED pARKI"'C; 6PAC~ E)(IsnNG: . . .~Q-:I~.~'F. or SEE 'PLAN . . ... . . . II II . . ; . . . ii' : :;?'l : : ~ :% c~ ft ONLY ORIGINALLY STAMPED AND ENDORSED COPIES OF THIS PlAN SHALL BE ACKNOWLEDGED BY TH~. CERTIFYING lAND SURVEYOR. . 55".4./ - '?G./ t-t/F GERon 'r' FIELD 'WILU TOBIAS FJELl~ C;;9.3'3 :?:.~ '> \..l-l :z ~\0-- INOT TO BE RECORDED I UNDE.R~ROLJI-/D UTIi..lTY 1:ASEME}...(T ~. 53745 -...J -...J -... TO: .\1f;~~S. . FA~q .1f9t1/'f-. tv(OJi~:-rr;AG-.E. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . AND NO OTHERS. I CERTIFY, TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWlEDGE, THAT THE PREMISES SHOWN ARE LOCATED IN FLOOD HAZARD ZONE: . . .c. . . , DELINEATED ON F.I.R.M. / COMMUNITY PANEL NUI.lBER: 250230-00 . J.l. . . . 0, BY THE FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY. EFFECTIVE DATE OF MAPS; JUNE 3, 1986 AND AS PERIODICALLY REVISED. THIS INSPECTION PlAN WAS PREPMED FOR MORTGAGE PURPOSES ONlY AND IS NOT TO BE CONSIDERED A FULL INSTRIJI.IENT SURVEY. lHS PlAN SHOUlD NOT BE USED TO ESTA@USH PROPERTY U~. FENCES, OOlGES OR 1& ANCIlliRY STRUClURES ON THE PREMISES. THE PROPERTY LINES SHOWN RELY ON CURRENT DEEDS AND PlANS OF RECORD. nus lNSPECl1QN PlAN IS NOT A CERTIFICATION AS TO THE TITLE OR OWNERSHIP OF THE PROPERTY SHOWN. OWNERS Of ADJOINING PROPERTIES ARE SHOWN ACCORDING TO CURRENT TOWN OF NANTUCKET ASSESSOR RECORDS. THIS PlAN SHALL NOT BE USED FOR ANY OTHER PURPOSE OTHER THAN ITS INTENDED USE STATED ABOVE. @Illackwell " Associales Inc. r.' rnDl#t. aa\ U'DII I-- W 0.J t U) ~ \--t\\...\... '-4 N E Owner: ~@~IJ@l&@l[g ~~~~[g@iO@~ ~&~ DIfil ~&~li'l1:!J@J({[gli' B ~@@. REVISED: 3-17- 04 SCALE: r = zoo DATE: NOv', 7) l. 00'3 . P~1?9RA~. ANP~9Qlj. . . . . .. . ., ..... ... ... 't...CT'3 . . . . DeedjCert.: .C~J?r: f(9'f1:4. Plan: L.~..17~77~ 1;:>. . . <I' Tax Mop: .5~.:4:4: .9~ Locus: .2.:7. . 0!LL. ~~'. . FBK.: BLACKWELL & ASSOCIATES, Inc. P-roJessional. Land SUTVey01'S 6 Young's Way Na.nt'UCket, Massa.chusetts Of554 "47 -134 (508) 228-9026 B- G 227 TOWN OF NANTUCKET ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS 1 EAST CHESTNUT STREET NANTUCKET, MASSACHUSETTS 02554 PHONE 508-228-7215 FAX 508-228-7205 NOTICE A Public Hearing of the NANTUCKET ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS will be held at 1:00 P .M., FRIDAY, APRIL 2, 2004 in the Conference Room, Town Annex Building, 37 Washington Street, Nantucket, Massachusetts, on the Application of the following: DEBORAH ANDERSON BOARD OF APPEALS FILE NO. 025-04 Applicant is seeking relief by SPECIAL PERMIT under Nantucket Zoning By- law Section 139-33A (alteration/expansion ofa pre-existing/nonconforming structure/use). Applicant is asking the Board to allow the alteration and extension of a pre-existing nonconforming secondary dwelling. In the event it is determined that the renovations to the cottage did not amount to a demolition and the cottage retained its grandfathered status as to setbacks, the Applicant is now requesting relief under this section to regularize the alterations already undertaken and completed within the required side/rear and front yard setback areas, which included construction of a new foundation, repairing of rotting walls, replacing of doors and windows, and adding an addition onto the northerly rear side of the structure that came no closer to the lot lines than the pre- existing structure had been sited. Should the Board fmd that there had been a de facto demolition of the structure, then the Applicant is seeking relief by VARIANCE, in the alternative, under Nantucket Zoning By-law Section 139-16A (Intensity Regulations- setbacks) to validate the secondary dwelling as reconstructed on substantially the same footprint, with the new addition. The cottage is sited as close as about 8.5 feet from the northwesterly rear yard lot line (if the frontage is taken from Mill Street), and as close as about 2.1 feet from the southwesterly side yard lot line (with a deck that is sited at zero), and as close as about 6.0 feet from the front yard lot line along Mill Street. For comer lots in the Residential-1 District side yard setbacks shall be increased from five feet to ten feet from any abutting street or way, whether constructed or not. The primary dwelling is also nonconforming as to setbacks with the structure being sited as close as about 5.4 feet from the northwesterly rear yard lot line. The Locus is conforming as to lot size, frontage and ground cover requirements. The Premises is located at 27 MILL STREET, Assessor's Map 55.4.4, Parcel 96, Land Court Plan 17877-D, Lot 3. The property is zoned Residential-I. /-,1;( (l~. (~ [eu'tt Nancy J. Sevre , hairman TillS NOTICE IS AVAILABLE IN LARGE PRINT OR OTHER ALTERNATIVE FORMATS. PLEASE CALL 508-228-7215 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION. NANTUCKET ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS 1 EAST CHESTNUT STREET NANTUCKET, MA 02554 CASE No6c>s-=-o <I FEE: $300.00 APPLICATION FOR RELIEF Owner's name(s): Deborah Anderson Mailing address: 27 Mill Street" Nantucket, Massachusetts 02554 Applicant's name(s): Same Mailing address: Same Locus address: 27 Mill Street" Nantucket, Massachusetts 02554 Assessor's Map/Parcel: Map 55.4.4, Parcel 96 Land Court Plan/Plan Book & Page/Plan File No.: Plan 17877-D, Lot 3 Date lot acquired: 11/17/03 Deed Ref./Cert. of Title: 20,994 Zoning District: R-l Uses on Lot - Commercial: None X Yes (describe) Residential: Number of dwellings 2 Duplex_ Apartments_Rental Rooms Building Date(s): All pre-date 7/72? yes C ofO(s)?All CO's issued except CO for Permit No. 611-01. Building Permit Nos: Previous Zoning Board Application Nos.: State below or on a separate addendum specific relief sought (Special Permit, Variance, Appeal), Section of the Zoning By-law, and supporting details, grounds for grant of relief, listing any existing nonconformities: See Addendum attached. d A ,:~!J ::3: :I::> ::u 01 v I certify that the in~ r knowledge, undevtl I I ntained herein is substantially complete and true to the best of my d penalties of perjury. SIGNATURE. ~/ Applicant Attorney/Agent ~ (If not owner s torney, please enclose pro \ of agency to bring this matt 'before the Board) (Ad FO FICE USE Application received on:Jj10Q.l By: Complete: ,. Need copies?: : Filed with Town Clerk:2J((P1Q't1'l.nll;"gB6~BUildingDept.: - I I ~: (f2<;J Fee deposited with Town Treasurer:s3..r/!iP-f!fBY:. ., aiver requested?:_Granted:_/~-----; Hearing notice posted with Town Clerk: 3/KQI cffM:ailed::SljJjJj&M:-3I{2JQ!/&3J2)'-; O~ Hearing(s) held on:~~_ Opened on:~_I_ Continued to:_I_I_ Withdr~wn?:_/~_ DECISION DUE BY: I I Made: I I Filed wIT own Clerk: I I Mailed: I I --- --- --- --- DECISION APPEALED?: I I SUPERIOR COURT: LAND COURT Form 4/03/03 --- ADDENDUM Assessor's Map 55.4.4,Parcel 96 Certificate of Title No. 20,994 Plan No. 17887-D, Lot 3 27 Mill Street Residential-1 The Applicant seeks relief by Special Permit under the Nantucket Zoning By-law (the "By-law") ~139-33-A (al teration/ expansion of a pre-existing non-conforming structure/use) to allow the alteration and extension of a pre-existing non-conforming structure on the property located at 27 Mill Street, Nantucket, Massachusetts (the "Premises") . The renovations included building a foundation, repairing rotting walls, replacing the front door and windows and, with respect to the addition in the back, extending the westerly line of the building. All of the alterations and extensions are minimal, and none of them are more detrimental to the neighborhood than the existing non-conformities. By way of background, the cottage on the Premises has existed at the Premises since at least the 1950' s and is shown in aerial photographs dating back to that time. On a 1995 As-Built (see attached) approved by the Nantucket Building Department (the "Building Department"), it is noted that the cottage predates zoning. The Applicant's predecessors in title obtained a building permit (No. 611- 01) dated May 31, 2001 (the "Building Permit") from the Building Department to construct a new foundation, a deck, and a 66 square foot addition on the back of the cottage. The addition, as proposed at that time in the Building Permit, complied with current zoning requirements being located outside the 10-foot setback areas. However, the size of the addition was increased and a small portion of which was sited wi thin said setback area though no closer than the existing structures, and not bringing the total ground cover on the Lot over the maximum allowable of 30%. The Zoning Enforcement Officer also approved the Building Permit Application. In October 2003, the Applicant entered into a Purchase and Sale Agreement to purchase the Premises. In the course of her due diligence, the Applicant's attorney reviewed the Building Department records and inquired of the owner as to the status of the renovation and the Building Permit. Al though she understood that a Certificate of Occupancy (the "CO") had not yet been issued for the Building Permit, the owner informed her that the renovations were almost complete and only the sign-offs remained. The Applicant also obtained an As-Built plan of the Premises (the ~Plan") (see attached) . The Plan showed the cottage in the same location as the 1995 As-Built, which was consistent with the status of the cottage as a pre-existing non-conforming structure. The Applicant purchased the Premises on November 17, 2003. The agent of the previous owner was required by contract to obtain the CO. When he had not obtained the CO by January 2004, the Applicant proceeded to take action to obtain the co. In February 2004, the Applicant was informed that the Building Department had received information that the previous owner had, in violation of the Building Permit, demolished the cottage in the course of his renovations. Although the cottage remains on its previous footprint, arguably it may have lost its grandfathered status as a pre-existing, nonconforming structure as a result of the alleged demolition. In the alternative, the Applicant is seeking Variance under the Nantucket Zoning By-law the ("By-law") ~139-16 (Intensity Regulations) to regularize the alterations and extensions undertaken within the zoning setbacks in the event it is determined that the renovations to the cottage amounted to a demolition, and the cottage lost its grandfathered status. The Premises is located in the R-1 District and is considered a corner lot as it is bounded on three sides by streets, New Mill Street to the west, Mill Hill to the south, and Mill Street to the east. Corner lots in the R-1 District are required to maintain side yard setback of 10 feet from any abutting street or way, whether or not constructed. The cottage is approximately 8.5 feet from New Mill Street on the northwest, and approximately 6.0 feet at it closest point from Mill Street on the southeast. The cottage has approximately zero side yard setback from Mill Hill on the southwest. As a result, the Applicant is seeking relief to regularize the existence of the cottage wi thin the setbacks. Owing to the circumstances relating to the shape of the land and the location of the dwellings, a literal enforcement of the provisions of the By-law would involve a substantial hardship to the Applicant. The variance relief requested would bring the Premises into compliance with the By-law without substantial detriment to the public good. / "'.? 1 .) ,. .) ,. \J' -;(., bD ~ -Z <::l" ~ ?-]"' ~ ~ ~EvJ Ibt;,SO ~, ~; ~~ M\ \-\, ?1'~e.~,:f ..9\ ~,\s rt') N'l ~ ..9 '\.01.. -- - MILL ST/:'E/::r {VOTE ~ eorrl1-t;..E ,A/5.()RrE~ i!O~/#~ ~~~[pd~w~,rQ) THE STRUCTURES SHOWN ZONING: ~-I MINIMUM LOT SIZE 5';000 61~ MINIMUM FRONTAGE: SO' FRONT YARD SETBACK :10' REAR & SIDE SETBACK:Sr GROUND COVER RATIO: 30 t' PLOT PLAN OF LAND IN NANTUCKET, MASS. ri~i'i~1-'UC~';:~~f GlElDH'!]G [~ ~. ~;?~~ !'15?S , SCALE 1" = ;;"D _ ,,,_r v~/~~/~vv~ ~~.~~ rfiA ~VO~'O~,~, .. lDIII& CLASSIFICATlal: R-I t.ItN. AAfA:. . . ~9P.Q ,~..Fj. . Wtl. FRONTAt;E: . . SP. rr.. . . fRONT YAAD S.B.: . . ~o. r:r; . . REAR & SIDE S.B.: . .~.FT. . . GROUNO COVER (X): . ~. . 7.. EXIST1NG: . . . ~Q-:1:7. S.F. ~ . ~~E; . ~L!:'" II ., . .. . .... . ., : :~'7.: :~:* 'l!dU", \, ONlY ORIGINAllY STAMPED AND ENDORSED COPIES OF THIS PlAN SI-W.L BE ACKNOWLEDGED BY THE CERTIFYING lAND SURVEYOR. 55.4./- ")G./ tJ/F GE'KOD ~. F/EL.D 'WILLI TOBIAS FJELD . (.;9. ~'3 C'HLAR\oIAY~: U' w w ~ I- If) -1 -l ~ ~ \ci Q ...) -.J - '> ~ \J..l :J. "^ \ \.J-. TO: . \{;:L;.k;S. . f4~q . Jf9~~. Mo,li:,rrrAG-.E. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . AND NO OTtIIERS. I CERTIFY. TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE, THAT THE I PRENlSES SHOWN ARE LOCATED IN FLOOO HAZARD ZONE: . . . ~ . . . ()(UNEA TED ON t.!. R.M. / COllllUNrTY PANEL NUMBER: 250230-00 . 1.1. . . . 0, Frf 1HE FEDERAL EMERGENCY ilANACEMENT AGENCY. EfFECTPJE DATE Of lW'S: JUNE 3, 1986 AND AS PERlOOICAU.Y REVISED. THIS INSPECTION PlAN WAS PREPAAED FOIl MORTGAGE PURPOSES ONLY AND IS NOT TO BE CONSIDERED A F\JI..l lNS'TRUWENT SURVEY. TItS PlAN SHOULD NOT BE USED m fSTABUSH PROPERlY UNES. F'ENCES. HEDGES OR NlY ANCIU.ARY .sTRUCJURES ON THE PREIIISES. THE PROPERTY LINES SHOWN RELY ON CURRENT DEEDS AND PlANS OF RECORD. . THIS INSPECTION PlAN IS NOT A CERTIFICATION AS TO lHE TITLE OR OWNERSHIP OF THE PROPERTY SHOWN. OWNERS Of ADJOINING PROPERTIES AAf. SliM ACCORDING TO CURRENT TOWN OF NANTUCKET ASSESSOR M~~. . lllIS PlAN SHALL NOT BE USED FOR Nf( OTHER PURPOSE OTHER THAN ITS INTENDED USE STATED ABOVE. INOT TO BE RECORDED I ~@~li@J&@~ U~~~~@ijj]@~ ~[L&~ IIJil ~~~D ~~. , SCALE; 1.:: ZOo DATE: NOI/. 7,200'3 Ownt:r: . ~~~~1:-<. .A~p~~J.,{. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 'LOT '3' . . . . Deec;jCert.: .q~ ~9"f)4. PIon: L~..17~77:-l;). . . . Tax Mop: .5?:4:4: .'1~ Locus: .2:7. . ~!L.L. ~-r:-.. . . FBK.: BLACKWELL d: ASSOCIATES, Inc. PrD/asiaRGl Land Svrwyors 6 Young's relY Na:niu.clcet. Massachusetts 02554 ~:7-r.34 (508) 228-9026 B- GZ27 51- el.TItOLIC ClilIlTCIIlV d o o .; ~ 1&.1 N 101 000. REVIS I N D"'E ,"",en COMPI~~:;~'f~~~I:HOWN HfREO~ WA$ ~NO PlAI"4S Of' REeOROL PHOTOGItAPHS, OEms. _..__..n .. ......:._".~.~.~~.~ TO IE ~,:t .. .. :z .. .. .J ~ \ OAf( '''ltcn rrhe rnn' NAN' 1\In A ~.......... . I 1I111.1'1_111"1~lliL -.., ~ \!~ If ., Q. (v .11 0 ._--~- '\ Town of Nantucket ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS LIST OF PARTIES IN INTEREST IN THE MATIER OF TIlE PETITION OF " ! "-,,_" c\ .. ." 1 "7 Cr' PRO PER TY.o wrjER... .. -A.&.b.~ .r.~. h. ..%'.\.\0.. . 0 .\X.?'Q. ~--:1.. .-:-.l..T:'J. u. oS .y.0. C \ e 1-( MAILING ADDRESS...........................:...................................... ..... . <') ~ '.h II -f PROPERTY LOCATION,...... ..c:7..:1:,... .1. ../...... .J......;....................... . . ;: 5 5'-1 <-I 9 to ASSESSORS MAPfPARCEL:., ...... .., .......-:. ... ... ............... ,.. ......... ... ...... 1 I \ rl/ll) . APPLICANT....,......................................................................,...... .. SEE ATIACHED PAGES I certify that the foregoing is a list of persons who are owners of abutting property, owners of land directl;- opposite on any public or private street or way; and abutter.s of the abutters and all other land owners within 300 feet of the. property line of owner's property, all as they appear ~:>n the most recent applicable tax list (M.G.L. c. 40A, Section 11 Zoning Code Chapter 139. Section l39-29D (2) .. lpl /, ( . "/ '::./, ~ l.~ . t. .!. .c.9 .C:.c:.'- /" ( .... .' ! I ;' /. . I.'. / l l )l 1/ .r'-\ /. .~ "M.. it" ,.. v . .1. ;::;{/:: . . . ",;';,,;:-:-!. (, . . . ,~- . ASSESSOR'S OFFICE Town of Nantucket / DATE' <' ~ ..... ,~ "- N o o o -.l N >-' "' 3: "' III <0 <1> >-' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ g ~ ~ ~ . . ~ ~ ~ ~ . . ~ . ~ . ~ . ~ . . ~ . . ~ . . . ~ . . ~ . ~ ~ . ~ . . '" ,... ,... ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 00 00 00 ~ CD m 00 m 00 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ m ~ m m ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ W W W ~ W W ~ ~ m m ~ . W ~ ~ 0 ~ ~ m ~ ~ m W ~ ~ ~ . W N ~ ~ m ~ 0 m m . W N ~ ~ W ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 0\" rt '" ,... ,... ,... ~ 5 a ~ s ~ ~ ~ ~ >< g >1 t' ::c n ~ "l l'l ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ; ~ ~ ~ ~ e e ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ! ~ ~ I ~ I ~ ~ e ~ s ~ ~ ~ B B B ~ ~ ! ~ a ~ S ~ ~ i ~ : ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ : ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ n ~ ~ n ~ >< e ~ ! HI ~ ~ ~ @ ~ ; g ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ III lnl n ~ e ~ ~ ~ g ~ ~ ~ >< ~ ~ ~ ~ >: "' t.i H ~ ~ ~ H ~ l'l ~ : ~ l'l C ~ a '" ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 ::c ~ > l'l ~ ~ ~ g g t' t' l'l ~ ~ :: ~ : ~ ~ ~ : ~ i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ >< ~ ~ ~ ~t! l'l : : ~ ~I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ : l'l > ~ ~ ~: ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a ....a ~ ~>HI ~~..- ~ ~n~t4><!ii '" ~ >< ~ ~ ie~ ~ ~~l'l>E ~ : ~ ~ !;l!:l ~!'l '" >: ~ "l '" III HI > > ~ '" CD n n "- "- o 0 n n ~ ~ >< >< it HI ~ '" HI i!i ~ '" tl ~ ~ ~ ~ tll '" ~ l'l n HI '" HI ~ ~ i!i Ui l'l HI ~ '" HI '" HI ~ HI >< HI ~ '" HI ~ !;l ~ .... CD .... W 0\ '" 0\ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ i!i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ t':l ~ ~ ~ . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ tl 0 ~ ~ : ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ E ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ i!i w HI ~ ! HI ~ '" '" ~ ~~t':l~ ~~~ '" ~ ~ l'l HI 0\ 6 ~ ~ i!i '" 0 ~ t-3 ~ ~ ~ ~ tl n i ~ : i i a ~ ~ '" n HI n "- o ~ III .... t' .... ~ n n "- o ~ '" llJ t4 ~ ~ tl gJ ~ ~ I I >: >< ~ ~ II! l'l l'l ~ ~ ~ ~ m ~ ~ ~ ~ [Ii l'l III >: ~ ~Ul i t;; "l "l ~ ~ ~ : : >: ~ ~ ~ 8 8 '" tll tll HI HI .. .. >< >< ::c ::c 8 n >< ~ ~ ~ ~ .... n ~ ~ 6 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ! ~ fil ~ ~ '" ~ HI '" '" >: > !f ~ '" HI ~ '" ~ I \C .... .... w .... .... I-' ~ mOl\) .... .... ~ ~~"II@i!ii!i = ~~ ~~~~ m o m H H ~ : '" ~ ~ ~ ~ HI ~ i!l ~ ~ ~ t;; ~ '" S !:l ~ S n '" SIC '" l'l .... '" l'l ; I !~ i i ~ ~ ~ i ~ I I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ I I I ~ I ~ ~ ~ i I~ ~ ; ; I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ Q ~ ~ ~ III ~ tll ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ '" ~ tl ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ _ ~ ~ H~~ ~ Q ~ H ~ ~ ~ ~ H H H H ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ &l ~1.l i'J ~ >< g ~ ~ o 0\ CD ..., o ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ g ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ g ~ ~ '" ~ '" CD '" o 0 0 woo 0 0 0 ~ 0 0 0 0 000 0 0 ~ ~ ~ 0 ~ ~ w ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ m ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 ~ 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ . ~ N ~ . . ~ W . Nom . . . . . 0 . ,... ~ w '" I ~ '" ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ '" III ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~ OOOOOOONOOO.....OOOOOOO N NNN....NNNNNN.....ONNNNNNN .... O'lOu.~lnlnlJl"-1....U1CDOlJllJ1U1U1lJ1U1111 'd W ~ lJI In UI In U1 . W UI ~ ..... U1 In lJ1 1JI In UI UI .... 0 . N . . . O'l 0 . 0 . . . . . . . . I\) ..... .... N ~ I\) '" '" N .... N ..... .... .... O'l ..... ..... w ..... .... N .... ~ . w w .... .... ..... ~ .... .... .... . O'l m m ~ O'l lJI W ~ ..... ~ lJ1.... In 0 ~ m O'l .... . ~ ~ ~ I\) ..... ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ : ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ HI ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ HI HI ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ HI ~ "'''' HI HI HI HI HI HI HI ~t<HI HI '" ~~ ",HI HI ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ \D ..... o,.J .... ..... 0\ CD 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ fil fil ~ '" '" HI HI HI ........ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .... III III b .... .... 0 ~ ~ III p: ~ ~ g II! .... o ~ '& ,.. rt n o ~ H I m >: i ----- ~ ~~ ~~ ~(J) 1-3t"i H (J) ~~ l2: Iil