The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About014-04 TOWN OF NANTUCKET BOARD OF APPEALS NANTUCKET, MASSACHUSETTS 02554 Date: ;((yn ( 30 , 20Cyl To: Parties in Interest and. Others concerned with the Decision of the BOARD OF APPEALS in the Application of the following: Owner/Applicant: o 14-0tf ;]o..S~n m- .f'cJlIl'VanDrx:Q F l~" o..hil. ;it- m ail Q f ( (I S'u (.tt 'Un.f\ Application No.: Enclosed is the Decision of the BOARD OF APPEALS which has this day been filed in the office of the Nantucket Town Clerk. An Appeal from this Decision may be taken pursuant to Section 17 of Chapter 40A, Massachusetts General Laws. Any action appealing the Decision must be brought by filing an complaint in court within TWENTY (20) days after this day's date. Notice of the action with a copy of the complaint and certified copy of the Decision must be given to the Town Clerk so as to be received within such TWENTY (20) days. Chairman cc: Town Clerk Planning Board Building Commissioner PLEASE NOTE: MOST SPECIAL PERMITS AND VARIANCES HAVE A TIME LIMIT AND WILL EXPIRE IF NOT ACTED UPON ACCORDING'TO NANTUCKET ZONING BY-LAW ~139-30I (SPECIAL PERMITS); fi139-32I (VARIANCES) ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE CALL THE NANTUCKET ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS. Zoning Board of Appeals 1 EAST CHESTNUT STREET Nantucket, Massachusetts 02554 Assessor's Map 67 Parcel 48.4 ResidentiallCommercial-2 6 1/2 Bartlett Road Plan Book 22, Page 14 Book 717, Page 64 At a public hearing ofthe Nantucket Zoning Board of Appeals, on Friday, March 12, 2004 at 1 :00 P.M., in the Conference Room, in the Town Annex Building, 37 Washington Street, Nantucket, Massachusetts, the Board made the following Decision on the Application of JASON M. SULLIVAN AND ELIZABETH A. MULLALLY SULLIVAN, PO Box 2154, Nantucket, MA 02584, on Board of Appeals File No. 014-04; 1. Applicants are seeking relief by V ARlANCE under Nantucket Zoning By-law Sections 139-16A (Intensity Regulations - setbacks). Applicants are asking the Board to validate the easterly and westerly side yard setback intrusions created by entry "stoops" for the duplex units that both contain fIrst floor living space. There are three stoops on the westerly elevation and two on the easterly elevation that extend to the property lines, and are made out of gravel infIll and pressure treated landscape timbers. In the alternative, Applicants are asking that the Board deny relief on the grounds that no relief is necessary, as the stoops in their current construction do not constitute structures. The Locus is conforming in all other respects to zoning. The Premises is located at 61'2 BARTLETT ROAD, Assessor's Map 67, Parcel 484, Plan Book 22, Page 14, Registry Plan No. 01-21. The property is zoned Residential- Commercial-2. 2. The Decision is based upon the Application and materials submitted with it and testimony and evidence presented at the Public Hearing. The Planning Board made no recommendation in this matter. There was one letter from an abutter in support of the Application. Applicants were represented at the Public Hearing by counsel. 3. Applicants, through counsel, explained to the Board that the design of the dwelling and its siting on the Lot was decided by a previous owner and his New Hampshire architect. The house was designed in 2001 and approved by the Nantucket Historic District Commission in Certificate of Appropriateness No. 38,203, without the Applicants' participation. Building Permit No. 1201-01 was duly issued by the Town of Nantucket Building Department on November 16,2001 showing no stoops and a foundation height that would negate the need for steps to enter the duplex units. In October 2002, Applicants bought the Premises from the prior owner using a seller fmanced purchase money mortgage. In the fall of2002, the Applicants refmanced the Premises through a local bank with a construction loan and discharged the mortgage given to the successor in title. In order to convert the construction loan to a mortgage with a more favorable interest rate this matter had to be settled fIrst. Applicants further stated that they were a young couple and had run out of money under the loan and could not afford to bring the grade up to solve the problem as the construction of the structure was finished. They could not purchase any additional land to cure the violation and the structure could not be moved on the site. Applicants represented that at the time of purchase the structure was partially completed with it being "tight to weather" and the Applicants continued on with the project to its completion, not being aware that there was a problem with the top of foundation height. Applicants represented that the type of foundation had been altered, apparently due to fmancial constraints, without their knowledge from a mudsill construction, which would have kept the height ofthe first floor low enough to enter the structure from grade. The decision had been made during construction to place a traditional foundation under it, which raised the fIrst floor height about 10", a point that then would require entry steps to comply with building code requirements. The Locus was conforming in all respects to Zoning and the structure itself conformed to the five-foot side yard setback requirement, having a long and narrow confIguration at about 22' x 84' in dimension. Applicants represented that as the lot was only about forty feet wide, the terraced entry steps had to be placed in the setback areas and they never thought it was going to be in violation of said setback requirements due to the type of construction. Applicants represented that neither the surveyor nor previous owner informed them of the change and need for a step, and the new owners did not notice the problem until during fmal inspection for the Certificate of Occupancy. The Zoning Enforcement Officer has refused to sign off on until there was a resolution of this issue. Applicants stated that bringing the Locus into compliance with setback requirements would cause an undue financial burden on them and submitted an estimate for raising the grade from a landscape architect that indicated that it would cost about $13,430.00 to eliminate the need for entry steps. In order to bring the grade up to eliminate the need for a stoop, it would be necessary to make the grade substantially higher than either of the two abutting lots containing commercial structures and flooding would result on those lots. If the duplex is viewed from Bartlett Road, the structure appears to be sited below grade with the driveway on a higher grade than the duplex. The grade in that area tended to be uneven and actually rose in the back on the south side towards Boynton Lane where more commercial structures are located. Applicants further stated that there were existing window wells that would be adversely affected and rendered useless to an extent, or would require substantial retention around them to secure them from flooding should the grade be changed. In addition, the option of leaving the house as constructed and surrounding it with a 12-18 inch high backfilled retaining wall, running the perimeter of the property lines in order to bring grade up to stoop level to provide access without a step down out ofthe door would be economically unfeasible for the Applicants and would be difficult to get approval for from the Historic District Commission. Applicants' counsel stated to the Board that in 2001, the year the Building Permit was issued, the interpretation of the Nantucket Zoning By-law was such that landscaped steps were not considered "structures" for the purposes of interpreting encroachments into required side yard setbacks. The five entryways (three on the westerly side and two on the easterly side of the structure) were comprised of terraced pressure-treated landscape timbers with gravel infill with a flat piece of flagstone placed at the top level. There were no railings and the height from grade to the last terraced area was about 22 inches. The doors were necessary for access for each duplex, which have ground floor living space. Further, Applicants' counsel presented the Board with a 2001 building permit for a house constructed with a similar terraced gravel in-filled timber pathway and steps within a required fIve-foot side yard setback that had in fact been signed by the current Zoning Enforcement Officer and signed by the current Nantucket Building Commissioner with a Certificate of Occupancy duly issued, and were not considered in violation of the setback requirement. In other words, Applicants and Applicants' counsel argued that in 2001, the year the building permit for the Premises was issued, the landscaped steps and stoop would not have been considered an encroachment into the side yard setback and to burden Applicants with a new interpretation ofthe Zoning By-law was inequitable. Applicants further argued that on inspection it was clear that all items were easily removable and the timbers were not nailed to the duplex structure, which they stated would not make the steps part of the structure. Said steps should be considered landscaping elements and thus not in violation of setback requirements. Applicants stated that they had acted in good faith in that they were under the impression that this type of construction did not count for setback relief 4. The Board was disinclined to accept that explanation out of concern that it would confuse the defmition of "structure" for the purpose of determining side yard setback intrusions in the future. The Board did not desire to establish a precedent by fmding that stoops required for access and made out of landscaping materials could be placed in the setback areas. Applicants' counsel and Applicants accepted the consensus of the Board and argued for the alternative reliefby Variance. Applicants' counsel stated that, inasmuch as the Locus was only forty (40') feet wide by one hundred seventy-fIve (175') feet deep in a zoning district that required 40 feet of frontage, due to the shape of Locus any dwelling built within said lot constructed with five (5') foot entry stoops on either side sited outside of the required side yard setback, would result in a house twenty (20') feet wide by whatever length that may be approvable by the Nantucket Historic District Commission. In any event, the resulting house would be so narrow as to be at a minimum very uncomfortable to live in if not virtually inhabitable. 5. Based upon the foregoing, the Board fmds that owing to circumstances relating to the shape ofthe very narrow and long lot (about 40' x 175') and topography of the lot and existing structure and especially affecting this lot and structure, and not affecting generally the zoning district in which they are located, a literal enforcement of the provisions of this chapter would involve substantial hardship, financial and otherwise, and the desirable relief may be granted without substantial detriment to the public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent or purpose of the Zoning By-law. The Board further fmds that in this case the Applicants acted in good faith and the error was inadvertent, and that there is no other remedy, with no property being available to the Applicants to purchase on either the easterly or westerly sides to correct the intrusion, other than to substantially change the grade ofthe Lot at considerable expense to the owners. 6. Accordingly, by a UNANIMOUS vote, the Board GRANTS the requested V ARlANCE under Nantucket Zoning By-law 139-16A to validate the easterly and westerly side yard setback intrusions created by entry "stoops" for the duplex units that both contain fIrst floor living space upon the fo llowing conditions: (a) There shall be no further change to the footprint of the dwelling without further relief from this Board; (b) The stoops shall not increase in area without further relief from this Board; and (c) The structure and stoops shall be sited substantially as shown upon the "Plot Plan of Land", done by Coastal Engineering Co., dated March 11, 2004, a reduced copy of which is marked as Exhibit A and attached hereto. April::b 2004 cJ~ -I Q...... ~- ....- ~, \,. ~! r- ~ := co ;;0 LV o \J N o _'" ... .- "' " "". .,,--.-....... ~~Y)- ~ ~--- ..II!>> e \10TH PUBLIC "'''' SARTlETT ROAD (VARJNIfoIiO _. _ _ __ , PLAN REF: PLAN BOOK: 22 PAGe: 14- ASSESSMS MAP 67 PARCEl. 484 ..- .... I 0.. NOTE:: "STOOP" CONSTRUCTED OF LANDSCAPE TIMBERS AND GRA VEL (NOT PART OF STRUCnJRE). ASSESSORS MAP 67 PARCEL. 4IU AREA · 5,901:i .. f. N ~ I f ASSESSORS MAP 67 PARCEL 14.1 ASSESSORS MAP 67 PARCEL 14 STOOP \.... TOP Of FOUNDA 110N ELEV. = 27.4-0 I I I ASSf'SSMS MAP 67 PARCEL 14.2 I HEREBYaRTIFY THAT THE DELING IS LOCA TED AS IT CXlSTS ON THr ,'_ ~~\ .s,s"!;:; .. yt.'..... ~ l~lAR' ~.~...'. . .,9 f\I.. c. OA rEo' 31!,1 elf PLS: /~~ _~. ,~\ Ii'. . -'I)' . i : '. -p t,'/ .. Plot PIal'} of Lan(f~~JifJ~/'" Nantucket, OassachusfJtfs .., prepared for Joson Sullivan Scale: 1" =20' March 1" 2004 Coastal Engineering Co., Inc., Orleans, Moss. .--- drawn by. .lOR file: C14186cpp-J.dwg C14186.01 TOWN OF NANTUCKET ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS 1 EAST CHESTNUT STREET NANTUCKET, MASSACHUSETTS 02554 PHONE 508-228-7215 FAX 508-228-7205 NOTICE A Public Hearing of the NANTUCKET ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS will be held at 1:00 P.M., FRIDAY, MARCH 12,2004 in the Conference Room, Town Annex Building, 37 Washington Street, Nantucket, Massachusetts, on the Application of the following: JASON M. SULLIVAN AND ELIZABETH A. MULLALL Y SULLIVAN BOARD OF APPEALS FILE NO. 014-04 Applicants are seeking relief by V ARlANCE under Nantucket Zoning By-law Sections 139-16A (Intensity Regulations - setbacks). Applicants are asking the Board to validate the easterly and westerly side yard setback intrusions created by entry "stoops" for the duplex units that both contain fITst floor living space. There are two stoops on the westerly elevation and three on the easterly elevation that extend to the property lines, and are made out of gravel infill and pressure treated landscape timbers. In the alternative, Applicants are asking that the Board deny relief on the grounds that no relief is necessary as the stoops in their current construction do not constitute structures. The Locus is conforming in all other respects to zoning. The Premises is located at 61'2 BARTLETT ROAD, Assessor's Map 67, Parcel 484, Plan Book 22, Page 14, Registry Plan No. 01-21. The property is zoned Residential- Commercial-2. ~~Q~ THIS NOTICE IS AVAILABLE IN LARGE PRINT OR OTHER ALTERNATIVE FORMATS. PLEASE CALL 508-228-7215 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION. " .. , NANTUCKEt ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS it 1 EAST CHESTNUT STREET NANTUCKET, MA 02554 APPLICATION FOR RELIEF CASE NO. (J I!I-o 1 FEE~~300.00 Owner's name(s): ~ /Y):. Soli, 'vOl') anceGi (2 n ~ef-f" 4-. fn oLio. If y Sud/ua '(J Mailing address: (/0 2/j y/ NanY-orlnf-/ /hI)- 0 ZS-tf'1 Applicant's name(s): ( J 0 me...) . . Mailing address: . ( So lTf\e) . _ . Locus'address: 6l \(2 . Pnrf:i..clf- ~C)(l& Assessor's Ma.l,PlParcel: UJ7/.tf i q _ _ / 0/ - 2/' · Land Court PlanlPlan Book & PagelPlan File No.: 2. 2- ( I tj . . Lot No.: ,_':? Date lot acquired: IOI-fO( Deed Ref./Cert. ~TitIW(jiU. ZonlngDistrict: [2. -C ;;L . it. ( - 2-/ . Uses on Lot - Commercial: None l::f.... Yes (des crib ) . o. . Residential: Number of dwellings_ DuplexA Apartments Rental Rooms . Building Date(s): All pre-date 7/721 or_lK)OOern fo..e~ 2a) r C ofO(s)1 Building Permit Nos: Previous Zoning Board Application Nos.: State below or on a separate addendum specific relief sought (Special Permit, Variance, Appeal), Section of the Zoning By.;.law, and supporting details, grounds for grant of relief, listing any existing nonconformities: d -;~ ~ a'fi'9~r1 O-cQ~oWvY\j " f"Ti co N ~:::.. "'n ^'.) 1 .- .' -J 7'J '-", I :;J '..0 nu,...TClTn.....T "Dnr.o"... r.on". Cl...TDr.on....n.n r<r;....rnT. T .l .....Tn r<nTrnT r.o___ "/n"J/n'2 ADDENDUM Applicants are seeking relief by Variance under Nantucket Zoning By-law Section 139- 16A (Intensity Regulations - setbacks). Applicants are seeking relief to validate fIve entry stoops that were inadvertently placed within the required five-foot side yard setback areas on the easterly and westerly sides ofthe duplex structure. Applicants had constructed entryways that are comprised of pressure-treated landscape timbers with gravel inside the terraced areas. A flat piece of flagstone is placed at the top level. There are no railings and the height from grade to the last terraced area is about 22 inches. The doors are necessary for access for each duplex, which have ground floor living space. Applicants had acted in good faith in that they were under the impression that this type of construction did not count for setback relief Applicants' lot is very narrow and the structure is 22' x 84'. There is no other remedy other than to substantially change the grade of the Lot at considerable expense to the owners. There are existing window wells that would be adversely affected and rendered useless to an extent, or require substantial retention around them to secure them from flooding. The lot has varying grade changes from the north to the south and the driveway is actually on a grade higher than the structure. In the alternative, Applicants are asking that the Board deny relief on the grounds that no relief is necessary as the stoops could be considered landscape elements and not part of the structure. The timbers are not attached to the structure and can be moved easily. Applicants argue that this type of situation has been allowed by the Building Department in the past when there is a setback problem, and the terraces have been fIlled in with another easily removable material, grass. In the original HDC approved plans the doorsill was shown at the top of the foundation due to a proposed mudsill construction plan. During construction the property was transferred to the Applicants and due to fmancial constraints a conventional foundation and sill were constructed. The original plans did not show the need for a stoop or any encroachment into the setbacks. However, with the change in foundation the doorsill was raised about 10" which necessitated one step. This problem was not noticed by the surveyor, the previous owner, nor the new owner until during fmal inspection for the Certificate of Occupancy. If the grade were raised to eliminate the steps there would be a possibility of flooding the neighbors to the east and the west. TO: ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS MEMBER DATE: FEBRUARY 13,2004 Due to difficult fmancial circumstances, my wife and I would respectfully like to ask for a fee waiver. All our money is tied up in this property and we cannot get the final payout from the bank without getting a Certificate of Occupancy, which is being held up due to the setback issues. Ifnot a full waiver, we would appreciate a reduction in the filing fee amount from the required $300. Sincerely, Jason Sullivan 9~~~ " of 325 1.2 I, 5" \ \ / / / 5 ' ~";i ~"' .-,--;..,1 ') > ) /' ---------------- ',,,", ""' ~- .~ \.? ------- v .- I a.. N N I lD a.. ABLE .wOTH PUSUC WAY) BARn.ETT ROAD (VARI _. . --- PLAN REF: PLAN BOOK: 22 PAGE: 14 ASSESSORS MAP 67 PARCEl.. 14.2 --- NOTE: .STOOp. CONS7RUCTED OF LANDSCAPE nMBERS AND GRA VEL (NOT PART OF S7RUCTURE). ASSESSORS AlAP 67 PARCEl.. 14.2 AREA = 5,901:1: Sot N ASSESSORS MAP 67 PARCEL 14.1 ASSESSORS MAP 67 PARCEL 14 STOOP OVERHANG I HEREBY CERTIFY THA T THE D IS LOCA TED AS IT EXISTS ON DATE: /(/~/o3 PLS: . 39.37 Plot Plan of In . Nan tucket, Massachusetts prepared for AIr. Len Campanale Scale: 1- = 20' November 4, 2003 Coastal Engineering Co., Inc., Orleons, Mass. C14186.0l --- I I I drown by. JDR tile; C141 86cppJ.dwg CERTIFICATE NO: ~ 5? ;) 0=3 DATE ISSUED: / Application to the HISTORIC DISTRICT COMMISSION, Nantucket, Massachusetts, for a . CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS I for structural work. All blanks must be filled in using BLUE OR BLACK INK (no pencil) or marked N/A. NOTE: It Is strongly recommended thst the eppllcsnt be fsmlllar with the HOC guidelines, Building with Nantucket In Mind, prior to submittal of application. Please see other side for submittal requirements. Incomplete applications will not be reviewed by the HOC. This is a contractuai agreement and must be filled out in ink. An application is hereby made for Issuance of a Certificate of Appropriateness under Chapter 395 of the Acts and Resolves of Mass., 1970, for proposed work as described herein and on plans, drawings and photographs accompanying 1his application and made a part hereof by reference. The certificate is valid for three years from date of issuance. No structure may differ from the approved application. Violation may impede issuance of Certificate of Occupancy. G // 9 ./ t1 , , , Chairman: / ~~:~-- k/~JI?TfjCUr1~"" Member: OwL 0)/ ~- Member: ! Member: ilif1G0QXlO~ Notes - com,(iQtsi- Rrstri ions - Conditions. FOR FFICE USE ONLY )- / H t) I 7 II?)" ( I I Fee Paid: $ ...)( ,) PROPERTY DESCRIPTION TAX MAP W 67f PARCEL NO. /4 c_ Street & Number of Proposed Work: 6 (1)0 v i I.R./t:f K-,,-{. Owner of record: L e '^ (' n VIA v:J0.. ~,Le I vlk'c!N Mailing Address: fief)< Ie) \ - ' I "}UU,A ,/1rrJ "5 ! vf'r:; UiA !J?.i Mi', Telephone: ')/)8 ,)2 r - '-1';--7 t(on island) (off island) AGENT INFORMATION (If applicable) Date application received: Must be acted on by: Extended to: Approved: Member: Name: Telephone: (on island) (off island) Mailing Address: . ~ew Dwelling D Addition D Garage D Color Change D Fence D Gate D Other (please specify) flu peE x Size of Structure or Addition: Length: q G, 0 I Sq. Footage 1 st floor: Width: 72, cJ ' Sq. footage 2nd floor: Sq. footage 3rd floor: Difference between existing grade and proposed finish grade: North ~1{.ff...!.1 Height of ridge above final finish grade: North 2<../' J I' South 2 <..f 1 Y Additional Remarks DESCRIPTION OF WORK TO BE PERFORMED See reverse for required documentation. D Garage/Apartment D Commercial D Historical Renovation D Deck D Paving D Move Building D Demolition D Revisions to previous Cert. No. D Steps D Shed /672. '!s~ <;f.? Decks: Size: Size: .AI} Iv) D 1 st floor D 2nd floor D 1 st floor D 2nd floor West ( . /, WestJ:-1-l-::....{J- ZL/',r' , ~I\ South L:-' -;.. rJ East t, East 2l/' [ I' ~..,~.f ~)~., Historic Name: BEVISIONS. ( describe) 1. East Elevation 2. South Elevation Original Date: Original Builder: Is there an HOC survey form for this building? DYes D No 3. West Elevation 4. North Elevation .Cloud on drawings and submit photographs of existing elevations. I' DETAIL OF WORK TO BE PERFORMED Foundation: Height Exposed I ;) 0 Block D Block Parged D Brick (type) Masonry Chimney: ~IOCk Parged D Brick (type) D Other Roof Pitch: Main Mass ..1.D12_ Secondary Mass ~12_ Dormer ~12_ Other Roofing material: 0 Asphalt Manufacturer D Fiberglass Manufacturer [}K\Jood (Type: Red Cedar, White Cedar, Shakes, etc.) f/( 1/.,,;( ea-k...- Skylights (flat only): Manufacturer AI J Model No. Size Manufacturer Model No. Size Gutters: ~Wood (type) < 1I?I'u. a D Aluminum f, I _ Leaders (material and size):' f ~ VI ~!-, ~ Sidewall: 0'Whlte cedar shingles D Clapboard (exposure: DOther l3'Poured Concrete DPiers Fence: Height: Length: Type: Location Location D Copper inches) Front only Trim: Lumber type D Pine Treatment D Paint D Redwood medar D Other D Stain-solid D Natural to weather D Clear oil finish I Fascia S '. Rake J ' Soffit (Overhang) !r . Corner boards 8 ,. Frieze N A Window Casing ~ Door Frame if ,. Posts: Round _ Square_ . Windows: Gl'Double Hung D Casement D All Wood 0 Other . /,V / tW.f l7i(,f 6-11.V1N..t bnH U! / /l~.(V-l.-t1/VL r(:n a. ffi...,,,,Z,,,/ o True Divided L1ghts(munllns) 0 Snap-In ~~lIes . . ';" /, . r I / ~ , .;;':f11vh ) . Doors (type and material): Front c,,{{/uf,'l'11. I; (e> h/ ReadAA./lr/\M ~__ Id hie l.U;lh,; Side ,'y.ec Cij:71u 4. , / ' Garage Door(s): Type A / A Material' Landscape materials: Driveways 7''1''rl / Walkways J..f-Wr' j~ . Note: Complete door and window schedules are required. Dimensions: Walls /V 111 COI-ORS Clapboard (if app)lcable) Sash ilv ( (I1rW {j ~ Foundation Roof Doors Fence -I, I :' -,,'_ / i..' i i I ,.' (. ~ " 'V'c, if IvecP I:: f//liihl dIYl./A, I ' Shutters Sidewall Trim I\j ~ . Deck . Attach manufacturer's coior samples. I hereby authorize the agent named above to act on my behalf to make changes In the specifications or the plans contained In this application in order to bring the application into complia~ce with ~he HD.C g.uidell.nes. ! hereby agr~e to abide by and comply with tpaterm~ and cond~ti6l's of thlll application. I h?,reby agree that the submlssllJP P!,any,r.~vlslons to thiS applicatIOn will Initiate a new Sixty-day review period/ . /. ~~"/'~I /. ' Date .". '. Si nature of owner of record '/0 f,., ,-' ,. ./. tel. ./ Bart\ett Road (Variable wi~th.. Public Way)__ N84'20 14 E - 4 . 0 <.:> d. ~ I ~ I HEREBY CERTIFY THA T THE CONDITlONS SHOWN HEREON COMPLIES WITH THE MINIMUM SETBACK REQUIREMENTS FOR THE TOWN OF NANTUCKET, MASSACHUSETTS. DA TE: ~ ?uJ '0 EXISTING try MANHOLE ~9.37' L N84'~14"E I. COASl'ALENGJNEERINGCO. ~ DC ~""""""jONAI. eNGINeeRS a ~ SUlvEYORS 2~Cra';"'~~" ~~M3 Certified Plot Plan prepared for Leonard M. Campanale Boynton Lane; NantuCket, MA March. 26, 2001, C141B6.01 Cf41~J.dwo1 .. " ~ 0.. ----z '1: -x \\ '''' ~ m~"O Cl 0<= . Gl_OG.>(DOm .c -- rtJ ~:5.e.!:E~ .o::J>OW",<= "'ii"O~~~g~ o ~ - E - 0.'- :a 0 g.o oo."E 9D. 8:~g~ ~~ ~ :.!:~~E~ (a;gJ!o..; <:J .. dl Q.!l ~ 7i lij-;Ec:oBlIi ii.....8 ~o::: c:~ <<D g ~ CD ~ Cog ........ c.~'E.!'5:O ~~ ~.J::. '" - lj= 'O::J .. .......:zS..IXI::Jc:C1.. iii .... as... 0 >- c... C) c.,:) LW --1 - ...... jH "1 ' 'I; ~-Jl J~"'" .I--u.,:::-:..- ~-"".I.' I .... ... .. '1" ~~~_',.- ~ r'~"--'- ~ -1 ii .-L---' j i- ,=,=~-"} 1_' ..f . i', k=<d:- i: &~q~~~, J' t.u. -:1 -= J. "!! _~~~t II! II I' i'1 ii I Ii I II! --Jl I___~:"- ~---.'" !~~:- '~:.~.i I~' .~. .,' r'-:::7..c'~~~;! C.-,................. . ..,-... . r-~~.__. :. . ~ ; ,I ~. h=......II' ~-r~ --.,.L,,' '.~! c-.nn'=:"ll ~ t .JJ. 1l... r" <:l ..... +~ , ~l~ r---~,b >....1 e-' c.:,') c,..:) Lw ..... ...... ...... A /, k ,)'1 !Iii, Ii I I ~-'.:. ,:: r ,:::::;;' j l--1.':' -- ... ., . ~ . ' . ] j8~.J.. .' ...~.=J._- j r;-----. I fr-..,..---r-... -------1, . r--'---' .,_._ ;:---r.,~._7:.:r'"~ I' ............-- I'~ -- "':;1 rn-; r--'-'+: ILL. . . J ..n' .~! rr==;-....'...~ ..--=--:-.=" ...,....L"I j~'~liH ,-_",__.-01...__1 I I; i ~... I .11 1.1 ...;1 II[ ..:1'1 -- --'.;. .'! I.~-I IF=' ,._..~.,.....,.,..., '..' :=l~' ;,. ,.~l i (1-' -:~ ~I IlL..' f,." HI I""'~' _=..1 I ~::~] I r-:c:=--='::!l ... (j -1 I I ... _..J - & \\ '-'-J.. A ~. $' . .~.'~ ~ ~ . .' \\i " tL\: \- . ,\\ ~ --z. ~ \\. -t.. ~ ~ ~ ~, ~1~ 1~~ +--t I. I J\l~ "\ 9 '()\ "3 B '2. () :) NO t:J- \ t=.f\\OR Crlf>.N\j~ti \NtTHO\5n-\.o.C, A~PRO\lAL , ~.. \' I ...l 1\\.' ~- i -~ ~ - -" " N~ Ii . j \) II. _' C\ ~ ~ \Ai'll' \\)\)l Ii \ + f- ~/-::l I' <g.', b I +-------------------- -1- I t-- -1' __I- i ~- ----z. 1\ \- \l II i' ~ i ") I, " ill " ~ -= ~\ }- -.r " " \;. ~ -S- \~ \ " ~ ~ -+ . r--1 -, l I ! I lL ..---------- - -<' If==-,-~-,,~-=- - r ; r~----. 1~-_.- - , ~~~~=~~y '._- - r G .(..- i I ~~....-:. ~ i ~ --, , '::] I l:...~=~~i~~:..=ril 1[-=..., t-~i ;,..--- ,~,. T'[ I.~._....-... -,---=~--~ ~ '- _.JI_~~._..... ILL.I Jj __,.1 ,.- ,f'-"" ',,~~ ! I l u. \) 1 ~ ""'l. r 'P',.\.-:z; (}-t1"j1 ~'::_~.:::'~';<~"') ~-_._-- ~ ~ ,;,' t ~I ~ 'l\ .\. ..:. ~ ~ .II ~ \ t- .., - t , T r.. \= \II 11\ ~ " ~ -:I: -t- .t ~ ~ " T ~ \- ,\. ~ c. UI .:, IT--l I I I I L___ :..... ....,--.-. . :'J". It~-U "i.i ~-,-_J'==.b.~~_ .; r=-:-~.;----~~r--' '-._-'.:r::~1 Ie. . i I' ...., ji B. "J!do.~.~ ' --1 i' II I ~-';="r.o';'7 i:-~ . _...._-~ ~ ';"! !~~~L~~.~~~~ ,,-.-- - ~~.- . :ii lac jL~.L_~ r----~-.- I '~~-rl -_. '_._m_ j " ..+r-- . ~ I Ii-- 'ol==__c! ~ -.71 -- -- -: I L-___ '" ~'~~~---'-~~l i-- ....,~: ~ i 1GI:1J~LIJ rt:- -ll" J . '71 I I I j ., "i .1 --L .~ '. 1\ I~,I . '. I' ,=-. tdh. 11 -.=1 I " \- 1 ') l\ .'I .1'u \) t;=.: " -"'::1--- ::. ~, 1'-:-___ [j r-=. .. *" " '\'\ ~i\ \- .1 Ll I} ~ t- 11\ ~ I --:l I} ~ + .i. ~ ~ ~~ II.. . tI .. -:t ~ ~ - li..... i " J.I.. , \- ~ ~ 0 -----.--- r I' '-~-- i , I I I I ( I r~J.~A'." ~ ,/ ~ // ~ v;;///,' // / .--- / ,,-1 ~ @~1 ,'f-- p-., __ ._--;~' ,--- 4--[ ~ lfi~ii ~_..-~ C~- ~'~', "'~ , , ','''' II . i: I I ; . I I . =~~-=:7-1 ! I I I' , , j , ,__" ,--' "11 I ,- - j ~l I '~--J , I c"rp1' ,-..- '" ,\, j ~~,--"~,- , lL=. ..:L Ii ".? r' I <:I ..., I r'S ~f7iAl)<l7"1--l q,;'-t-.... II I I-f -~ .m ~f Di L::::..-=.,.L-" '1 ! -+ ~ .l. <:f:l -" _' ll. .. ~ .. - .", ~ 4 -- } ~ .l o I- ~ ~ .- , \- -= ~ ~ '\ \\'l ~ M - T ~ t- .' m ~ ) <t \ ,- - \I T I \l\ \II ....-1. ,.. I -,~+ r..... \ \~ .l.."l. \ -----" '~ ~ 1\ II 3- \-: 11 t "3. "3. ;; u"}~=~~~'=~ Il&';=d"_,,',~,,jl . :'\2 ~ '~'~>"'" - I ~< i '-,..",-- ;;J '<<:-...., I, I", ,i~," I II + ~I_ ~~ -ii ,,~' I .~-= '~> -- " r-'- =c 1.='''::~~i i '- I 'I I :"1 I, I .l-' I": ::-~ --=.- -~~-=.d 1 @ ;; r ; 2.. I +- -'- _ JI i -= ~-= =: ~~~ ~ +- -~ --- --- + --z. ~ \ ... ~ 1\\ } 1\.\ ~ 't ).. -~ \- \\ a. ~ ~ I) ~ .,. f '. L \,\\ Ii David Champoux Landscaping, Inc. . PO Box 3195 Nantucket, MA 02584 &rf-, fncdP ?<i> &. h 7 Of ro~ Estimate Date Estimate # 2/1612004 102 Name I Address Jason Sullivan 6 1/2 Bartlett Road Nantucket, MA 02554 Job Location Bartlett Road Description Qty Rate Total Remove Timber/Dump Dcbris Regrade Deliver and Spread Loamlyd.3 3/8" Stone/ton Deliver and Spread JCB Loader Wall Construction ft.3 38 8 8 84 370.00 90.00 90.00 65.00 100.00 370.00 3,420.00 720.00 520.00 8.400.00 Subtotal $13,430.00 Sales Tax $0,00 Total $13.430.00 ~ ()J)'Y- >r \ ~ WVv-d~J I~ ~ 1\ q,DO Town of Nantucket RECEIVED BOARD OF ASSESSORS FEB 1 7 2004 {TOWN OF NANTU.CKET, MA ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS LIST OF PARTIES IN INTEREST IN THE MA TIER OF THE PETITION OF ~ . PROPERTYO~EK'''''''~''''~'''t:..~. MAILING ADDRESS"........." 'c,' ;..;:..:.. ';5'''''''''''''' ,.....,.." '2J / PROPERTY LOCATION......... ... ..0........ .........~./.~----- . .' ;: / '1'" / j ! /~ ASSESSORS MAPIPARCEL:..... ... .fa..... ..7.: ...7........ ....... ...... .... ........ APPLICANT................................................................................... . SEE ATIACHED PAGES I certify that the foregoing is a list of persons who are owners of abutting property, owners of land directl" opposite on any public or private street or way; and abutters of the abutters and all other land owners within 300 feet of the. property lirie of owner's property, all as they appear ?n the most recent applicable tax list (M.G.L. c. 40A, Section 11 Zoning Code Chapter 139. Section 139-29D (2) ,. $d:::.../~..i? .t!.1! r /J 'Il~ r~........,'", DATE' ASSESSOR'S OFFICE Town of Nantucket '. " t!l ~~ tIl H ~ ...:IE-t tIltl P:u ~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ : : 3 3 3 3 : : : ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ : ~ 3 3 ~ : : : ~ ~ 3 ~ 3 3 3 : ~ ~ : o ...,....~'" ::i.................."':z;:z;:z;~..a..:z;:z; l!; ~.. ~ i I I I I ~ ! I I I ~ ~ ~ ~ I I I I I I ! ~ ~ ~ ! ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I ~ I I I ~ ! I I ~ ~ "N M ~ " ~ ~ ~ 00 M rl M rl ~ ~ ~ m ~ N ~ N M M ~ rl rl n N M N n ~ ~ 00 ~ ~ M M M "' "' .. .... .. <Xl o '" I I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ . . n M ~ m ~ m 00 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ m ~ ~ ~ ~ m ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ m m m N N ~ ~ ~ m ~ ~ . m ~ ~ ~ M M N ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ M ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ M M 0 ~ N N N N N N N M N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ 0 0 0 0 0 000 0 0 000 0 000 0 0 0 000 0 0 0 000 0 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .. .. ..: .. 8 8 8 8 ~ ~ ~ 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 W 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 ~ 8 8 8 ~ ~ ~ e e e e ~ ~ e ~ ~ e ~ ~ ~ e e ~ e ~ e e e ~ e ~ ~ ~ ~ <Xl ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ g I I ~ ~ ~ I I ~ ~ I I ~ ; I I ~ ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~ I I I ~ I I I I I I I I ~ I I I '" " " ell ~ t> d ... .... ... ;;! "' .... ltl ~::: re!il: 3 ~ ~~ f.1 ltl 22 ~ ~~ ~ 991il a ~ '" "''''~ t><:0~l"l......l5 lD!:: ~"'"'"'aa!::~ 0 l"l<Xl" ....0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ : : ~ ,,"'lD"''''ltl'' fi:8"'a....f:!"l"'a<Xl.."'.."'''''''ssai<"''''......'''~fj........s : ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ i ~ ~ ~ ~ i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 8 8 i i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 8 ~ III III III ltl l"l ~ S III III iil III III III t><: III III III III III III III III III 4 2 2 2 2 ~ 2 ~ .. "' 2 ~ 2 ~ ~ 2 .. 2 2 2 ~ 2 2 2 ~ ~ ~ ~ 2 2 2 2 2 2 ~ ~ 2 2 2 ~ .. <Xl U ~ :z; .... .. ~ <Xl ., ~ ~ ~ .. ~ tl !i1 01 .... <Xl ~ ~ t!l I!j ! ~ ~ I '" ~ .. I I I 9 !:: .. 15 <Xl :z; 0 ~ : .. e ! g ~ 3 :z; <Xl r.. " ~ ~ ~ I (5 e ~ ~ ~ I ~ .. lil a a J III 2 ~ (Oi r:! r:! .. '" I ; III i <Xl t!l 000 0 000 0 .... .-f.............. ...... " "" " u ., ~ 0 U U U U U U 4 ., )l ~ 1'1) E ~ ~ ~ ~u~ t!l ~ Ol~"~ liE ~~~ ~:~~ u~ ~ E:~~ t!l ;~)l~~~~~ 5~..:i ::l~)l ..: ~ ~ ~ : I!j 4 ..: i : ~ : a : : i i i ~ ~ ~ ~ III m ~ I ~a ~ j : ~ : : ~ I a I ; ~ i ~ ~ ~ i ~ ~ s e I I I I a a : : ! : ~ ! i ~ I I See a ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ u ~ .. g ~ m ~ ... t!l ~ ~ B i i i :z: :z: ~ ~ III g .. ~ e ~ <Xl <Xl ~ re re :z: " ; iil<XlI" ~ ~~!91>: C OlOl"'C ....!9<Xl B~ <Xl I ":::l~~ t! ~<Xl!figj~<Xl5<XlOOl~": ~~ ~l>loB~;""~ OlOlH j ~ ~1t I a I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ i i ~ ~ ~ i ~ ;~~! ~ ~ I ~ ~ 5 ~ 41{~ rl~t"\ "('II rtNP"I'lfIll'Dr-CD"'.... ......"',..(1)0.'1""4 .... NNNNMO\"""Nrr').., It)\Qr''''r''''r''''r-r-r--r-man''lIll.D o 0 0 0 0 0 M ., ., ., ., 0 rt N ~ (f) .., ., .., ~ .., ., ., ., . ., .... .... """ .... .... ..... ..... .... .... .... CD \Q \Q ~ M .................. rt ., ., ., .., ., .... .... .... " .... ..... ..... ..... ..... " .... .... " .... ..... " .... .... .... ..... .... ..... ..... .... .... .., \Q \Q \Q i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Q) tJ> '" 0.. --------------- - :;: 0.. '" '" '" '" '" o o N " r- rl " N " o .... ... ~ f;: f;: f;: f;: f;: f;: f;: o H ~~~~~~~ M i!HliiliH! e ~~~~~~~ <<I IlCJQUl'lCCQu~ P4 It) III III ('l') C"'I M ('I') .., "It' .., "It' .., .., t"- It) III 10 10 III ('Ill 'liP s;l.IIlIllIllIOUl"l:l'N .r-f C\I N N N C\I.., III N OOOCOrotr-- ~ ~~~~~~~ .. .. .. .. .. g g 11111j~ '" " " III j to " .... M .... ~ :;! H ~ Ei CI) ~ H ..:lEi ~B ~ ., ; i ~~ .. .. .. i i ~~ "' "' "' '" '" '" H ., " ~~t;1O lQl2: " M ~ M ~ ~ lil lQ lQ ~ ~ :;: "' .., ~ ~ 0 0 "' .. '" '" .., .., .. ClD .. .. .. f;'l ., ., ., ~ ~ ~ II: .. r- ~ ~ >< i i i f;: H tl i i i t! ! :j H lQ " ., ., ., I . ~ .. ., ., ., J ~ ~ ~ ., ., ., ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 :i! :i! :i! u ~ ~ ~ ., ., ., ~ ~ ~ H H ., ., ., II: II: l<: H H H ~ ~ ... :t: ; eee~~~tl ~ !il!il!ilee5~ i ijlU2! ~ '" ! ~ ~~~ 15 "" rl rl ....NM.....C\lf") .. 0 rl ... r- r- r- M ........... 0 0 0 .. .. .. "' "'"'"' N H .... .. .. .. .. .. ...... co i .-f r- r- r- r- r- r- r- ...... 10 10 10 10 1010 10 N <V '" '" '" ----------