HomeMy WebLinkAbout012-04
TOWN OF NANTUCKET
BOARD OF APPEALS
NANTUCKET, MASSACHUSETTS 02554
Da t e : Fe fonfl.Y1-j ;{ 0 , 20 DC;
To: Parties in Interest and Others concerned with the
Decision of the BOARD OF APPEALS in the Application of the
following:
Application No.: 0/2 -(J Lj
Owner/Applicant: Jd ["'-n Cbm(p / OCt)rvzr- am
~&;::-~~~ God fh1 chaet .l'nrxrhYi
Enclosed is the Decision of the BOARD OF APPEALS which has
this day been filed in the office of the Nantucket Town
Clerk.
An Appeal from this Decision may be taken pursuant to
Section 17 of Chapter 40A, Massachusetts General Laws.
Any action appealing the Decision must be brought by
filing an complaint in court within TWENTY (20) days after
this day's date. Notice of the action with a copy of the
complaint and certified copy of the Decision must be given
to the Town Clerk so as to be received within such TWENTY
(20) days.
~Q\-1~~qQq~
JL.nM ~ 0 .' 'n!); Chairman
cc: Town Clerk
Planning Board
Building Commissioner
PLEASE NOTE: MOST SPECIAL PERMITS AND VARIANCES HAVE A TIME
LIMIT AND WILL EXPIRE IF NOT ACTED UPON ACCORDING' TO NANTUCKET
ZONING BY-LAW ~139-30I (SPECIAL PERMITS); ~139-32I (VARIANCES)
ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE CALL THE NANTUCKET ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS.
NANTUCKET ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
37 Washington Street
Nantucket, Massachusetts 02554
Assessor's Map 73.3.2, Parcel 44
9 Carew Lane, Siasconset
Sconset-Old-Historic
Deed Book 289, Page 176
Plan Book 20, Page 6
Lot 2
DECISION:
1. At a public hearing of the Nantucket Zoning Board of
Appeals, on Friday, February 6, 2004, at 1:00 P.M., in the
Conference Room, Town Annex Building, 37 Washington Street,
Nantucket, Massachusetts, the Board made the following Decision
on the Application of JOHN CAMP, Owner, and ABBY CAMP MURPHY and
MICHAEL MURPHY, Applicants, c/o Sarah F. Alger, Attorney, Two
Union Street, Nantucket, Massachusetts 02554, Fi~e No. 012-04:
2. Applicants are seeking relief by VARIANCE under
Nantucket Zoning By-law (the "By-law") S139-16A (Intensity
Regulations) in order to validate the lot shown as Lot 2 (the
"Locus") on the plan recorded at the Nantucket Registry of Deeds
at Plan Book 20, Page 6 (the "Plan") as separately marketable and
buildable from an adjacent parcel of land. The Locus was part of
a 1978 subdivision of a larger parcel, which left the Locus with
insufficient frontage and non-complying as to the By-law. The
Locus is conforming as to lot area, front yard setback, and
ground cover. The Locus is nonconforming as to frontage, having
about 12 feet of frontage along Carew Lane in a district that
requires a minimum frontage of 50 feet; and as to setbacks, with
the dwelling being sited as close as about 4. 7 feet from the
westerly side yard lot line and as close as about 0.5 feet from
the northerly rear yard lot line, in a district that require a
minimum side and rear yard setback of five feet. Said setback
violations were not created or affected by the subdivision in
1978. In addition, Applicants are seeking relief by SPECIAL
PERMIT under By-law Section 139-33A (alteration and/or expansion
of a pre-existing, nonconforming structure/use). Applicants
propose to substantially renovate the existing single-family
dwelling and separate conforming garage. The work would include
placing a new foundation under the structures, attaching the
garage to the dwelling and converting it, or rebuilding it if
necessary, to living space, enclosing the porch on the northerly
side of the Locus, and extending the wall on the west side of the
Locus to accommodate a new bulkhead entrance to the basement. The
existing nonconforming setbacks would not be made more
nonconforming though there would be a lateral extension of the
structure wi thin the required setback areas. Any increases in
height within the setback areas would either be done within the
existing footprint or over the new wall extensions. In the
alternative, the Applicants are seeking relief by VARIANCE under
Nantucket Zoning By-law Section 139-16A to complete the project
as proposed should the Board find that the renovations are not
allowed by Special Permit relief.
The Premises is located at 9 CAREW LANE, SIASCONSET,
Assessor's Map 73.3.2, Parcel 44, Plan Book 20, Page 6, Lot 2.
The Locus is zoned Sconset-Old-Historic ("SOH").
3. Our Decision is based upon the Application and
accompanying materials and representations and testimony received
at our public hearing. The Planning Board indicated that this
Application presented no issues of planning concern. There was
no opposition presented in person at the public hearing. There
was one letter of opposition in the file from an abutter who was
concerned about cars backing on to Carew Lane.
4. Applicants, through counsel and personal testimony,
represent that they are seeking relief by Variance under By-law
S139-32 from the Intensity Regulations of By-law S139-16.A,
Minimum Frontage, to validate and regularize the inadequate
frontage created by the re-subdivision of two parcels of land, of
which the Locus is a part, into two lots, each nonconforming with
zoning requirements, by the Plan, which was endorsed by the
Planning Board on an Approval-under-the-Subdivision-Control-Law-
not-Required ("ANR") basis. On the face of the Plan, it is noted,
"Plan endorsed with insufficient frontage due to buildings being
in existence prior to the Subdivision Control Law (the "Law")
being in effect in Nantucket (1955)."
5. Applicants represent that the structures on the Locus,
consisting of a two-story, wood frame single-family dwelling and
a separate garage, are pre-existing, nonconforming structures
with respect to side and rear setbacks as described above. These
setback violations were not created or affected by the
endorsement of the Plan. The other lot, Lot 1 on the Plan ("Lot
1"), which is not before this Board for relief, contains about
5,002 square feet of lot area and has about 43 feet of frontage.
The dwelling on Lot 1 does not comply with side yard setback to
the east as result of the Plan. The frontage and side yard
setback violations of Lot 1 were both created as a result of the
endorsement of the Plan. The Locus and Lot 1 remained in common
ownership until the Locus was conveyed to the current owner and
one of the Applicants, Abby Camp Murphy, the current owner's
former wife, by deed dated February 4, 1978, recorded with
Nantucket Deeds in Book 162, Page 264, after the 1972 enactment
of the By-law.
6. Applicants represent that, at the time of the
subdivision that created the Locus and Lot 1, the Law required
the Planning Board to endorse plans on an ANR basis where there
was a structure on .each lot being newly created that predated the
2
1955 effective date of the Law in Nantucket, even though the lots
approved did not conform to the dimensional requirements of the
By-law. Conveyance of lots with zoning nonconformities created by
ANR plans, such as Lot 1 and the Locus, into separate ownership
after the 1972 enactment of the Zoning By-law, was not recognized
as a problem on Nantucket until the mid-1980's. The theory under
which such violations were said to exist was commonly known on
Nantucket as the "Dale Doctrine." Many similar Applications for
Variance relief to validate this type of zoning violation have
been brought before this Board since the mid-1980' s, and have
been routinely granted relief to validate the lots as separately
marketable and buildable from the other lot(s) created by the ANR
subdivision. The relief has been characterized as technical in
nature. When Applicants purchased the Locus in 1978, they acted
in good faith and were not aware, and had no way of knowing, that
the conveyance of Lot 1 and the Locus into separate ownership had
created zoning violations. Applicants further represent that they
cannot cure the violations in the absence of relief from this
Board, as there is no other land to add to the property to cure
the frontage violation, nor could the Locus be merged with Lot 1
at this time. Under the Law, the Planning Board must grant ANR
subdivisions in situations such as this without regard for any
dimensional zoning violations as a result of said subdivision.
The setback nonconformities were present prior to subdivision and
the 1972 enactment of the By-law and were unaffected by the
subdivision, and thus grandfathered.
7. Applicants also seek a Special Permit under By-law
S133-33A(4), or in the alternative, a Variance under By-Law S139-
16A, to allow the alteration and extension of the pre-existing
nonconforming dwelling on the Premises. Applicants propose to
renovate the existing two-story, wood frame dwelling and garage.
The renovations include placing a foundation under the
structures, attaching the garage to the dwelling and converting
it to, or rebuilding it, if necessary, as living space, enclosing
the porch on the northerly side of the Premises, and extending
the wall on the west side of the Premises to accommodate a new
bulkhead entrance to the basement. The ground cover of the
completed structure would not exceed the 50% allowed in the SOH
zoning district, and the one required on-site parking space would
continue to be provided. To the extent that the height of the
structure was increased, such increase would be within the
footprint of the existing structures. Applicants state that a
Special Permit would be the appropriate relief, as opposed to
Variance relief, as the setback nonconformi ties were present
prior to the ANR subdivision and the 1972 enactment of the By-law
and were unaffected by the subdivision, and thus grandfathered.
The northerly and westerly sides of the dwelling are sited within
the five-foot side yard set back areas. The proposed renovations
3
would increase those nonconformi ties by extending the walls on
those sides of the dwelling in either a vertical and/or
horizontal direction. However, in both instances, they would not
bring the walls any closer to the lot lines than the existing
structure. Both of the extensions are minimal and neither would
be more detrimental to the neighborhood than the existing non-
conformi ties and would be a benefit with the upgrading of the
structure.
8. Applicants represent that the one required on-site
parking space would continue to be provided on site, which would
require backing out on to Carew Lane. There is not sufficient
area on the Locus to provide a turn-around on the site, and
backing out of parking spaces was permissible in this SOH
district. Applicants state that there was ample on-street parking
in the neighborhood of the Locus and that most properties in the
neighborhood that provide on-site parking (and many provide no
parking at all) have parking spaces that require backing out on
to the street. No relief is sought or needed to allow backing
out.
9. Therefore, based upon the foregoing, the Board makes
the following findings:
(a) That owing to circumstances relating to the shape
and topography of the Applicants' land and structures but not
affecting generally the zoning district in which the Locus is
si tuated (consisting of the pre-existing configuration of the
buildings upon the tract from which the Locus was divided), a
literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning By-law would
involve substantial financial hardship (consisting of the lack of
marketability) to the Applicants, and that desirable relief may
be granted without substantial detriment to the public good and
without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent or
purpose of the By-law (since this Board has generally granted
similar relief to other Applicants in like circumstances). The
Board further finds that there are no other available remedies to
cure the frontage violation at this time.
(b) That the structures on the Locus pre-exist the
1972 effective date of the By-law, and as such, their violations
of the side and rear yard setback requirements of the By-law are
exempt from enforcement as validly pre-existing nonconformities,
and as a result, the proposed alteration and extension of the
pre-existing nonconforming single-family dwelling may be allowed
by Special Permit, and relief by Variance is not required.
(c) That there would be an increase in the
nonconformity of the structure with the minimal vertical and
lateral extension of the dwelling within the setbacks. However,
4
the Board further finds that the granting of a Special Permit to
allow the proposed alteration and extension, wi th such
nonconforming setbacks not being made more nonconforming, would
not be substantially more detrimental to the neighborhood than
the existing nonconformi ties and would be in harmony with the
general purpose and intent of the Zoning By-law.
10. Accordingly, by UNANIMOUS vote, the Board of Appeals
GRANTS relief by VARIANCE, from the requirements of Nantucket
Zoning By-law S13 9-16. A as to validate the Locus, as currently
configured, and the structures thereon as currently sited, as a
separately marketable and buildable lot from adj acent parcels.
By a further UNANIMOUS vote, the Board of Appeals also GRANTS the
requested relief by SPECIAL PERMIT under Nantucket Zoning By-law
S139-33.A, to allow the proposed alteration and extension of the
pre-existing nonconforming dwelling on the Locus, including the
attachment of the garage structure to the dwelling and conversion
of said garage into living space, and extension of such structure
within the side and rear yard setbacks, with such nonconforming
setbacks not being made more nonconforming, subject to the
conditions set forth in Paragraph 11.
11. The relief hereby granted is subject to the following
conditions:
(a) There shall be only one dwelling unit on the
Premises without further relief from this Board.
(b) One on-site parking space shall be provided on
site.
(c) No material exterior construction associated with
this project shall be performed upon the Locus in any given year
between June 1 and September 15.
( d)
shown on the
dated June 14,
as Exhibit A.
The Locus shall be configured substantially as
"As-Buil t Plot Plan," drawn by Robert A. Emack,
2002, a reduced copy of which is attached hereto
(e) The alteration and expansion of the structures,
which structures are currently configured substantially as shown
on Exhibit A, shall be done in substantial conformity with
Certificate of Appropriateness No. 43,280, issued by the
Nantucket Historic District Commission, as the same may be
amended from time to time.
5
(012-04)
Dated: February ~O , 2004
.....
~
c. Richard Loftin
Jjo'v
Michae J. O'Mara
6
"
-i
c)~-.
~-
Z'"
d
,~
c
r
,
.,.,
nt
co
N
o
?a
---
N
w
NOTES:
1.) LOT DOES NOT CONFORM TO CURRENT ZONING
REQUIREMENTS WITH RESPECT TO MINIMUM FRONTAGE.
2.) STRUCTURE DOES NOT CONFORM TO CURRENT
ZONING REQUIREMENTS WITH RESPECT TO
SlOE & REAR YARD SETBACKS.
3.) LOT IS SUBJECT TO EASEMENTS, APPURTENANCES,
RIGHTS AND AGREEMENTS AS SET FORTH IN
DEED BOOK 162, PAGE 264. h
0)
~
73.3.2-6 ......
N/F CHARLES E. FIERO
73.3.2-41
N/F HARRY F. &
DOROTHY D. BLISS
73.3.2-44.1
N/F BRENDON P. &
BARBARA A. BERNARD
C4l?~1Y
S'/'}?r:.
~'Ii:,/,
CURRENT ZONING: ROH
MINIMUM LOT SIZE: 5,000 SF
MINIMUM FRONTAGE: 50 FT
FRONTYARD SETBACK: NONE
SIDE AND REAR SETBACK: 5 FT
ALLOWABLE G.C.R.: 50%
EXISTING G.C.R.: 33.6% :!:
FOR PROPERTY LINE DETERMINATION THIS PLOT PLAN
RELIES ON CURRENT DEEDS AND PLANS OF RECORD,
VERIFIED BY FIELD MEASUREMENTS AS SHOWN HEREON.
THIS PLAN IS NOT REPRESENTED TO BE A TITLE
EXAMINA nON OR A RECORDABLE SURVEY.
N.S. 14 13
73.3.2-45
N/F MARTA B. NORRIS
73.3.2-7
N/F FRANCES D.
DEWEY, TR.
L.C. PL. 38312-A
AS-BUlL T PLOT PLAN
IN
NANTUCKET, MASSACHUSETTS
SCALE: 1"=20' DATE: JUNE 14, 2002
DEED REFERENCE: OBK 289, PG 176
PLAN REFERENCE: PLBK 20, PG 6
ASSESSOR'S REFERENCE:
MAP: 73.3.2 PARCEL: 44.2
PREPARED FOR:
ABBY CAMP MURPHY
EMACK SURVEYING
2 WASHAMAN AVENUE
NANTUCKET, MA. 02554
(508) 325-0940
J- 526
E~.~
TOWN OF NANTUCKET
ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
1 EAST CHESTNUT STREET
NANTUCKET, MASSACHUSETTS 02554
PHONE 508-228-7215
FAX 508-228-7205
NOTICE
A Public Hearing of the NANTUCKET ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS will be held at
1:00 P.M., FRIDAY, FEBRUARY 6, 2004 in the Conference Room, Town Annex
Building, 37 Washington Street, Nantucket, Massachusetts, on the Application of the
following:
JOHN CAMP OWNER AND FOR ABBY CAMP MURPHY AND MICHAEL
MURPHY, CONTRACT PURCHASERS
BOARD OF APPEALS FILE NO. 012-04
Applicants (Murphy) are seeking relief by VARIANCE under Nantucket Zoning
By-law Section 139-16A (Intensity Regulations) in order to validate the subject Lot as
separately marketable and buildable from an adjacent parcel of land. The Lot was part of
a 1978 subdivision of a larger parcel, which left the Lot with insufficient frontage and
non-complying as to the Zoning By-law. The Lot is confonning as to lot area, front yard
setback and ground cover. The Locus is nonconforming as to frontage, having about 12
feet of frontage along Carew Street in a district that requires a minimum frontage of 50
feet; and as to setbacks, with the dwelling being sited as close as about 4.7 feet from the
westerly side yard lot line and as close as about 0.5 feet from the northerly rear yard lot
line, in a district that require a minimum side and rear yard setback of five feet. Said
setback violations were not created or affected by the subdivision in 1978. In addition,
Applicants are seeking relief by SPECIAL PERMIT under Nantucket Zoning By-law
Section 139-33A (alteration/expansion ofa pre-existing nonconforming structure/use).
Applicants propose to substantially renovate the existing single-family dwelling and
separate conforming garage. The work would include placing a new foundation under the
structures, attaching the garage to the dwelling and converting it to, or rebuilding it if
necessary, living space, enclosing the porch on the northerly side of the Locus, and
extending the wall on the west side of the Locus to accommodate a new bulkhead
entrance to the basement. The existing nonconforming setbacks would not be made more
nonconforming though there would be a lateral extension of the structure within the
required setback areas. Any increases in height within the setback areas would either be
done within the existing footprint or over the new wall extensions. In the alternative, the
Applicants are seeking relief by VARIANCE under Nantucket Zoning By-law Section
139-16A to complete the project as proposed should the Board find that the renovations
are not allowed by Special Permit relief.
The Premises is located at 9 CAREW STREET, SIASCONSET, Assessor's Map
73.3.2, Parcel 44, Plan Book 20, Page 6, Lot 2. The property is zo . ed onset-Old-
Historic.
ancy 1. Sevrens h irman
TillS NOTICE IS AVAILABLE IN LARGE PRINT OR OTHER
ALTERNATIVE FORMATS. PLEASE CALL 508-228-7215 FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION.
NANTUCKET ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
1 EAST CHESTNUT STREET
NANTUCKET, MA 02554
CASE NO. () l2 Aj q"
FEE: $300.00
APPLICATION FOR RELIEF
Owner's name(s): John Camp
Mailing address: 54 Souidias Street, Athens, Greece 10676
Applicant's name(s): Abby Camp Murphy and Michael Murphy CC"!Y\.1-ro ~L~~~r
Mailing address: 117 Myrtle Street, Boston, Masssachusetts 02114
Locus address: 9 Carew Street, Siasconset, Massachusetts 02564
Assessor's Map/Parcel: Map 73.3.2, Parcel 44
Land Court Plan/Plan Book & Page/Plan File No.: Plan Book 20, Page 6, Lot 2
Date lot acquired:02/4178 Deed Ref./Cert. of Title: Book 289, Page 176 Zoning District:.$OH
Uses on Lot - Commercial: None X Yes (describe)
Residential: Number of dwellings 1 Duplex_ Apartments_Rental Rooms
Building Date(s): All pre-date 7/72? yes C of O(s)?
Building Permit Nos:
Previous Zoning Board Application Nos.:
State below or on a separate addendum specific relief sought (Special Permit, Variance, Appeal), Section of
the Zoning By-law, and supporting details, grounds for grant of relief, listing any existing nqj.confo~~ities:
-n
See Addendum attached. ~
N
W
:']
,...)
,,')
'-D
I certify that the information contained herein is substantially complete and true to the best of my
knowledge, under i: ains an pities of perjury.
SIGNATURE: Applicant Attorney/Agent
(If not owner or'owner's attorne lease enclose proof of agency to bring this matter before the Board)
FOR FICE USE
Application received on:~ l~/cl. By: Complete:
Filed with Town Clerk:.1-j2)'~Plan~ BOllrd: .' I Buildiag Dept. / / ~y: L1,~
Fee deposited with Town Treasurer:-.L/~-t By: ~er requested?:_Granted:_/_/_
Hearing notice posted with Town Clerk:L?}~ Mailed:it 2Stt2i I&M:L?-2/0cf & LZ? /0("
Hearing(s) held on:_/_/_ Opened on:---1_/_ Continued to:_/_/_ Withdrawn?:_/_/_
DECISION DUE BY:_/_/_ Made:_/_/_ Filed w/Town Clerk:_/_/_ Mailed:_/_/_
DECISION APPEALED?: / / SUPERIOR COURT: LAND COURT Form 4/03/03
---
ADDENDUM
(Owner: Camp; Applicant: Murphy; Nine Carew Lane,
Siasconset, Massachusetts)
The Applicants are seeking relief by Variance under
Nantucket Zoning By-law (the "By-law") ~139-32 from the
Intensi ty Regulations of By-law ~139-16. A, Minimum Frontage, to
validate and regularize the inadequate frontage created by the
subdivision of a parcel of land, of which the subject property
(the "Premises") is a part, into two lots, each nonconforming
with zoning requirements, by plan endorsed by the Planning Board
on an Approval-under-the-Subdivision-Control-Law-not-Required
("ANR") basis on January 30, 1978, recorded with Nantucket Deeds
in Plan Book 20, Page 6 (the "Plan"), a copy of which is
attached. On the face of the Plan it is noted, "Plan
endorsed with insufficient frontage due to buildings being
in existence prior to subdivision control law being in
effect in Nantucket (1955)." The Premises, shown as Lot 2 on
the Plan, contains about 5,184 square feet, with 5,000 square
feet being required in this Sconset Old Historic (SOH) zoning
district, and has about 12 feet of frontage where 50 feet is
required. The structures on the Premises, consisting of a two-
story, wood frame dwelling and a garage, are pre-existing,
nonconforming structures with respect to side and rear setbacks,
having side yard setback of about 4.7 feet at the dwelling's
closest point to the westerly lot line, and rear yard setback of
only about 0.5 feet at the dwelling's closest point to the
northerly lot line, where side and rear yard setback of 5 feet is
required. These setback violations were not created or affected
by the endorsement of the Plan. The other lot, Lot 1 on the Plan
("Lot I"), contains about 5,002 square feet and has about 43 feet
of frontage. The dwelling on Lot 1 does not comply with
side yard setback to the east as result of the Plan. The
frontage and side yard setback violations of Lot 1 were
both created as a result of the endorsement of the Plan.
The Premises and Lot 1 remained in common ownership until
the Premises was conveyed to the current owner and one of
the Applicants, Abby Camp Murphy, the current owner's
former wife, by deed dated February 4, 1978, recorded with
Nantucket Deeds in Book 162, Page 264. The violations
resulting from the endorsement of the Plan on an ANR basis
because the structures preexisted the 1955 effective date
of the Subdivision Control Law in Nantucket were not
recognized on Nantucket until the mid-1980's, and the
theory under which such violations are said to exist is
commonly known on Nantucket as the "Dale Doctrine." Owing
to the circumstances relating to the shape of the land and
the location of the dwellings, a literal enforcement of the
provisions of the By-law would involve a substantial
hardship to the Applicants. The variance relief requested
would bring the Premises into compliance with the By-law
without substantial detriment to the public good.
~3r+
The Appvicants are also seeking a Special Permit under
By-law !;;133:LA-(4), or in the alternative, a Variance under
By-Law !;;139-32, to allow the alteration and extension of
the pre-existing non-conforming structures on the Premises.
The Applicants propose to renovate the existing two-story,
wood frame dwelling and garage. The renovations include
placing a foundation under the structures, attaching the
garage to the dwelling and converting it to, or rebuilding
it as, as necessary, living space, enclosing the porch on
the northerly side of the Premises, and extending the wall
on the west side of the Premises to accommodate a new
bulkhead entrance to the basement. The ground cover of the
completed structure will not exceed the 50% allowed in the
SOH zoning district. To the extent that the height of the
structure is increased, such increase will be wi thin the
footprint of the existing structures. These structures
were originally constructed prior to 1955. As the attached
As-Built Plot Plan shows, the northerly and westerly sides
of the dwelling are within the five (5) foot side yard set
back. The proposed renovations will increase those non-
conformities by extending the walls on those sides of the
dwelling. However, in both instances, they will not bring
the walls any further into the setback; rather, the walls
will remain along the same line as currently exists. Both
of these extensions are minimal and neither will be more
detrimental to the neighborhood than the existing non-
conformity.
Sarah E Alger
E-Mail sfa@nantucket.net
Sarah E Alger, EC.
Attorneys at Law
Two Union Street
Nantucket, Massachusetts 02554
Alison Sweet Zieff
E-Mail asz@nantucket.net
Telephone (508) 228-1118
Facsimile (508) 228-8004
January 13, 2004
BY HAND
Linda Williams
Administrator
Nantucket Zoning Board of Appeals
Chestnut Street
Nantucket, MA 02554
RE: Abby and Michael Murphy
9 Carew Street
Siasconset, Massachusetts
Dear Linda:
Enclosed please find five (5) copies of the Application for Relief, a check for $300 and
the abutters list and labels in connection with the above captioned property. If you have any
questions or concerns please feel free to call.
Si cerely,
Sarah F. A~
Enclosures
73.3.2-41
N/F HARRY F. &
DOROTHY D. BLISS
NOTES:
1.) LOT DOES NOT CONFORM TO CURRENT ZONING
REQUIREMENTS WITH RESPECT TO MINIMUM FRONTAGE.
2.) STRUCTURE DOES NOT CONFORM TO CURRENT
ZONING REQUIREMENTS WITH RESPECT TO
SIDE & REAR YARD SETBACKS.
3.) LOT IS SUBJECT TO EASEMENTS, APPURTENANCES,
RIGHTS AND AGREEMENTS AS SET FORTH IN
DEED BOOK 162, PAGE 264.
73.3.2-6
N/F CHARLES E. FIERO
73.3.2-7
N/F FRANCES D.
DEWEY, TR.
LC. PL 38312-A
73.3.2-44.1
N/F BRENDON P. &
BARBARA A. BERNARD
73.3.2-45
N/F MARTA B. NORRIS
C4l?~1Y
S'/'}?r:.
~'Ii:,/,
CURRENT ZONING: ROH
MINIMUM LOT SIZE: 5,000 SF
MINIMUM FRONTAGE: 50 FT
FRONTYARD SETBACK: NONE
SIDE AND REAR SETBACK: 5 FT
ALLOWABLE G.C.R.: 50%
EXISTING G.C.R.: 33.6% !
FOR PROPERTY LINE DETERMINATION THIS PLOT PLAN
RELIES ON CURRENT DEEDS AND PLANS OF RECORD,
VERIFIED BY FIELD MEASUREMENTS AS SHOWN HEREON.
THIS PLAN IS NOT REPRESENTED TO BE A TITLE
EXAMINA TION OR A RECORDABLE SURVEY.
N.B. 14 13
AS-BUlL T PLOT PLAN
IN
NANTUCKET, MASSACHUSETTS
SCALE: 1"=20' DATE:JUNE 14, 2002
DEED REFERENCE: DBK 289, PG 176
PLAN REFERENCE: PLBK 20, PG 6
ASSESSOR'S REFERENCE:
MAP: 73.3.2 PARCEL: 44.2
PREPARED FOR:
ABBY CAMP MURPHY
EMACK SURVEYING
2 WASHAMAN AVENUE
NANTUCKET, MA. 02554
(508) 325-0940
J-526
_..,,~':l:.
zo~'rO
~ ~c:~~
lt~..""
(>~ oS S'
In'r-o 0
1t"'~O
,,0-_
...~:r."
. ... ..
~~lI)O
:o.~ as ~
~~~~
t'" ~-
... ~
>-"
l(;Z:~
~"''''I
"'~;;
~_l'I
a~:t
",;
_n
~ .....
~~~
i::o~
~ I'l~
/"J
o
R E Y
/..A}/C
..
...
C\
...
~. ~
: \ ~
.. ..
.. 0:
/I ~
.. r-
.....
...
,......
....
M.b ~
&~ =
..0'"
~~
...
II
c::
"
...
!'
,. :>
" ..
/Il~
~~
-,.
~"
!II
I
!
f
I
I
I
f
l.'h~
. II VI i
ut
a
~v
eo
..
1"0
",/I
. "
~~
~
~~
~"
..
~
..
~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~..;;::a..
;. ~~.~~~"
"'C "'tt:" PI ...
l;f " c:: c:: ~ .... ..
~ ~ ~ ~.. ,:'(;: ,.
.~~.. ~ c:1Il. 0.1")
=-~~.. ~ ~~
Oil::!:;:to =~" /OJ
~"= ""~'f
\,o....!:;lII ..
;..' . "I~. ~
....~~ "
t ~ ~:....
.. CI)"
" !"
"'10
n ...
~ ~
... .
"
~ ~
~
"I a
~
~
Qi
, ~
("
~
Ii
'.
k
--.",.~~....-'.-,'
,-ii"""';;'-'--"_
~''''''',,j~>'<
. ,
l. C. 3831ZA
I?- $ I:--
..
o '"
/I '"
o ~
~ ,.
... r-
1'1
;t ..
~ !"
..
;...
FR~M.: BENTLEY & CHURCHILL
FAX NO.
512 482 8400
Jan. 21 2004 03:18PM P3
~' -" - '" .-\~~.. :..,~"':::".~;';;'r'~"':~:~'?'~-:-:':--.::::i ::'::,or>o'.f '~~r.;' -' 'l
(~I, ....,,,,,, '} ,_ ~<, "~'~ _;,~, ~~~J~)~~~"'::-~'~:i~:~f.~~;;:r;;\..~~l~o~'~~~;~~ ,0
"-c'~~~':~~:-?ES?)~i)"~S:;CI';:id~\;.:;t ~f II'
., '>",~. ___ ._.,_~~",_.._..__~..,.,.""o... ",ol"'l h.\.
,,>,.;;o:~~~.:___~ ;;...2"~~(I!ft;~2:i':Bo::{t~~~:;~ ~-~ ;~:~~~:;~~~::'~;:;'j ~r':::\ :'\;nO- ~ ui ..'
'. o'l ": ~..:'I , " 0 : I~.:...._..' i .1-_,: - =' ~ L!,.' JIWf~ IC,
~l :-..:' . =,,'1 ,': , ;..;' " ..!;lI~ iii :1'1'1""11' i,o",.,Iir ~ I '"
rThf''',;' ,":i.: :~^:::;.,~;;.:ii.:;!';:';(:':'::": .. j;~' ~,J P:;)I \ ",; I., ::'jlli\ r/--, ~\
lliNhH!Vi.t::::i-*--:.... --~ -::.---:;~..:., -,1:\ ~"'"l' P"'),)~ \:: ;:, \' I: \::-1:.,:\ ~-~.:: " i
I I:'{l;':':':~ .,-,,-;=-...:-.'-:-":~- '~~h;:~,,).:,1 -'" 1,.,,::11\ II!i.':III'~II-! \
t ~.:.. .L~.: - .." -: ..:....-:. --;- -;J..:"' -:::..~~Z ~ -i~. t .J . 'i; :" j " !, ! 1 II - ~
t''''':b'V''L. . .-. 0 '-' .....: -8'.' "", u,,~.f,,~r 11',t', \., . :Ii!'j'\~' I
A' , ~..~/ ",,~~~I'h. q 1'11'11'1 II "
- .., ~ .'-" \":.,1 ..1\"11 .......~J..
::. .10';;.:.0.., l':I':I'\::"\i"il,.r,(1 ~r
. ", _~~~.:~ ~llo";"I,,:,,!oII00"I"'U
. __ I I",(~-.' " .' " 'J' :;:flh:iil'L\
.. >~ " ,~.
_ _ :'~,,/ ,. , i lo>:}' . -? -." "
.!:~.,&Cj' ,.,.~:JI)\"/ \4.~\ . :
--l
o(\'.
~
..-
't'
~IIE-
P LA r--J 10' oJ" ".."
1-,
~o,j
~
\>:l
~1'lt-\~ ~r.~U"? ~Wt4 P>f'f'F-O
~
;'0
~;:?lJ 0
. ~'fI'f.e.T
,.
~
~ ~ :'\3
:z:.-
\'0 ~ ~
0 -1
~ ~
t
\ \S
5" ~
. .~.
.
-n
\ -\
...
CU "
~ ~"
\i H
! . .
\ ~
.~
' .
\}.) :~:
~ i
\"\) ~.
~ ~
\\ L
":--\ ~!
).
.-
\J "~
" ,-.
\I' ~i
\J ,\ =-j "
-
-
cl
~
,~--~
. '"
'<'. " ....:\ ;
, '
~~
:t...
"""'lI' .
n
::-
ffj
liL,,,..-....,~
,I'! ~:-. .~. -~~ '\
; k; !: ; :r~ ~ ~
\ i. t I W ~ .
( ~LU~~ l'
\. Jl ~~ ~~i; ~
, If':', ----1-.J ',I ~
\. I ~i;! I lif f
.~:{~/
~~j~ _: ~~~Ii
~~:l. ..~ J !
ir":!1 ,;;.-/. I
~!. \ . ~T::: I~ . i
~ r~! t~ :i!
"":"C ;t i:, jt' 1':1
,~ ;~: t ; ~ l~. i~ i
~ :l[lrgJJ: ~ . i, i
. ~"""' 'I .
rrf~11
r:- - __ ___""' ",-l~ ,\I.} 0
~i f:>'~~1
.. . ;- - - - ra.; '~ 1- - - - - - ...
~ ." ~J ~- ~~
\O""~~ , II I Ln
" d
(i,\: f,="j .
~J
~
~
~
j
~.
~
~
~
.'f.I
~
!
,
,
':,./
,
.......'
,
vd llIHJ~nHJ ~ A3l1N3H : wo~~
I~
L't.
~.,. 7I,.r-~'"
~ 1.' \~
. '" ::..
. l . z~
'"
....... "
,/......,' '\
\ \.. \j
""
(\I
\'
~
~
~
.\J
l
~
J
Iil
7.-
:Ir
!I~ ~
~ \\ 8
)(' ~ ~
:;::;;\ :!- I
~':t-
,; ~
~--1.
}::
7:!
'-
..$.
'\J.
00178 c817 c't~
~d Wd6't:~0 1700c 'tc 'u~f
~,,~
1~~ it::r" ii},
~1 k l:'~ 1:---:: '.."_ \
~c:':..-......:~.
\ I"', -:;:tl !i i: :'"; \
~- .!~~
N ::-~\
I,U\ \
l:~: \
.'i~' ."j:;':\'1
__~.~.J,; ~:!i-..:,~~ i ;!;: \
. " ,;,:i,-,!,~,~
L_~J~_~.. '::~L.. I:! Ii;!
.... i ,~r
"\. .. .....J I ' . . .: ~:.~
ii ~ri~! k1
'I ~'.,I..
l' ." s-' I' i~r
I~_' I'
j!' L....:...:...:l~~ iil!
I ;i .! - /" =::' ,!j,1
11'0 '-- '~j
~-_ - .' - - ~_ I ~
~~. ! I 'iF'=I~:j:--l9rr ! ':'!
7 r 1 "="='~=,===~ I' 'I
~ [11~-:1~~7f.~~tII~
.\ L '.:.__L_....JI llt{
II ,., I ,I I'~
- i i.!==..-~,<iJ, 1i~i
....J"'~~ I r:: F'" Ii I !l~i
r.'____....... l.:-....).,__&~. I :l~.
i'~::';,'rl" i': ,: ,: II'i:
;;~;~ ;:~ ;: i !r~l
l-,-_,,~ iL_L__j! 1.li;!
, ;~~.IF~
r l':;--1:----i'1 ,,:)
~ ,:,=;----:-; I!~
. I '~,;L.!L--..:I '::1
~ ' ~ ~~ 1',1 (
~ ' .~; '"
. 'J I ,
~J ~ ~~. ;"f'r\'7"i
(1\ ?;1~ -U~ I
\ 1).: -1 :
(\\ :,~I ~." .!;
I ~ (~~ ;jl- ~~~j , :111
-\ ~-r..: ~ I I ! q
, .b,L.l' :,
CJ/1~$; I I: wi
I~ ?~~ t, -L.; ~!
J1J f CJ
!J- ~~
;. ;;;::::::If..!;
! fir-',=ij
\... il~' :-~"
/ ~~j=~~i
f :l!.- .::'
( ~"J
,> ~;:::-.:
,\.i ;q~~i
;i~:t~
: );:~-- i I
L~ ._~
\. '-~ . I
'r~~ it'g,
\i,~
:'-~' ~ ~~~
'-_.~ -..
\5)
\J
C
&.:h~i'
'"
~ l~l l!:: ~
: :<-;: .';
~I{~~~
~ .
J. ::==i'F--;-:
::~Hii
~' . !
,_/~
.,/~----".
r/
~,
\.....---......-
'ON Xtl..:l
llIHJ~nHJ ~ A3l1N38
WO~..:l
c ..
"'-../
~,
.:;..~ , ~
~[ ,
~'
~
, ~
I -
,
....
L \ ' J
II <,
\l\ i - q
0' i !:'--"- "t11 I
~ I~L.....;_:
I" . ,_
1'1 .1 o!
io li Il..---Jj
,n
c;:- 1'- .J~
j -: --
I,'r-""j--';
. 1I11--.....J ,~~
lll~a.}."..: 0'
I'I'-::.:!.'~ : t
if--- \
'-....\ ~ , 1
\\'\
< IIRB
~
\) II .-
H-;! :1: I u
I ~
l '11""1: ': I ,- 41
"J I I ;,' I ~
..- ~=- r i
Z ~ I l
~! ~
I~ ~~ ..:c.
~.i\ :i ~E.
1-'\'- .E.€ ~ i.~
I \,- ;; II .z....
i ~: ~ --<"
~ I ..
\ ,'--'= I ,
"r' i
I g I
I iiL-.;
I !
I
....... ,............ ..
9d Wd0Z:[0 V00Z lZ 'U~[
00vB ZBv ZlS
'ON xt:J.:l
llIHJ~nHJ ~ A3l1N38 WO~.:l
{
\
\:
c
I)
L
,-
is
I
I'
it
i~
L;"
I~
~~'I
~~...!
'\ ,)\! 'C.'1: ~
'i~ ~~
no;! --
if !f
i-i
" )
-! ~\ ~~[!I ~ ~
7; :t Iii r- i!j I
U d.. ,I.-L-.;! i- I"~
r- ~~.;! ~ ~J
~ i~'I- :
. /-t$; '":.>-'''U' (~ I
I . I'\~. f~"''''''''dl i 0 i-
-..IR~J~~~~-JU
',1 - 7: ~ .; l' I: " it =, !
J I . ' . ,t'"", ~
i! - -IF' ,~~'~c-81o
~~II' ~- b I
. II ~I . . hI:
'rl: j' : !!!;
~ ,I. I ~~
f: 1 rLl . :1
!: C '\Jr.:; ;,," ~-rIJ
U~_~ ~ JII.~ ..!I~i YW,'
Vvi~I~! ! 1:------- ~iA I
:~-----~~O 'uL~
r [fJrx] l~t~: \ !,II
~.. y I Y
I \\ I . : 'i
I l' i . !. II
I !\ ,:.. ~ ~ If
I ;L 1 :$ ~ LL j!
10 ~ J' d
I ij I ; t
: t!- ql
: I I~ cJ :j
~! i: :~ I /1'. ;j'
.1 t jiji"'j ~7 '
. ~,~~ i~[ -2:
I ,I Y Y J .
.~ ,:;! 'i'i
i l ~ J!
I"-_____-_--.=~
I
I
~
...
.~ :L..-
~ .
I
. ~
~
--! ~.
.:t~
Cj\l~ .~ f
f~ - .
-. ~ ~ P
% I ,
!
. I
\\ I
- I
- -\ i
I It .
CV ~ -u
~ -I~'- .
N - ~
IG \~ ~ ill
Ill{ it
I!"" 0\
-K;J r
l1'F=
RS'
. ,
TN
: I
"'\J
i
~I
; ,
~
1=.
\'
f
.""
t
*'
~
.~.,- .
.~_ -.--.t=-'_
Gd Wd8l:[0 v00G lG .U~[
00v8 G8V GlS : .ON X~~
llIHJ~nHJ ~ ^3l1N3H : wo~~
'"
~
RECEIVED
BOARD OF ASSESSORS
JAN 0 5 2004
TOWN OF
NANTUCKET, MA
Return to Sarah Alger
508-228-1118
Town of Nantucket
jJ g.o 6
ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
,
(',
LIST OF PARTIES IN INTEREST IN THE MATTER OF THE PETITION OF
PROPERTY OwNER,....,.., .J.<?h~.. ~<;i~P,...."........"....,..,........."..........
.' -J .
MAILfNG ADDRESS.......... ,C:!.?, ~.<;L;r:<;1,l?-,X.., ..~.~~~,r:?} ..1!~~.<?~. ,~~~.e;~.~... ..~antucket,' MA 02554
PROPERTY LOCATION...,.. .~, .~.~~,:~ .!:-~I,1.~,. " ,....,... "..,. .,....,......,.".....
..
-: . Map 7332, Parcel 44.2
ASSESSORS MAPIP ARCEL..",.,.......".....,.".....,.".,.,......,.,..",...",.....
APPLICANT.... ........ ...,..... ~::?;1~.....,....." ........... ..,... ...... ....... ,..... .., ... ..,
SEE ATTACHED PAGES
I certify that the foregoing is a list of persons who are owners of abutting property, owners of
land directl~ opposite on any public or private street or way; and abutters of the abutters and all
other land owners within 300 feet ofth~ property line of owner's property, all as they appear on
the most recent applicable tax list (M.G.L. c. 40A, Section 11 Zoning Code Chapter 139. .
Section 139-29D (2) .-
~:.. .?:~... ~ ~.'!., i
~TE ,-
/) "va~
/~~...........
ASSESSOR'S OFFICE
Town of Nantucket
'-
r
~
~ ~ ~
i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~
g~~~~~~~~ .~
r-- r-f CI'} 'I't '" 1"""l N 0
M '" ~ ~ M N M N ~ ~
~ ~ f< f< ~ ~
l2; l2; ~ f< f< ~ '" '" f< >
H H f< ~ ~ ~ ~ '" '" ~ ~ ~ ~ '" ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ t S ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ g g ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ s
r:J r:J ~ ~ H H H H H r:J r:J ~ ~ ~ ~ r:J & r:J r:J r:J r:J r:J r:J r:J ~ ~ ~ M
~ ~ E ~ ~ ~ ~ E E i ~ ~ 2 2 g i S i i i i i i 5 ~ ~ 0 g
r&I Ji:1 Ii1 I'll 1'&1 f&l Il. fa I
1"""l 0 0 ~ M ~. N ~ ~ M " r-- m 0 1"""l ~ m "
M ~ 1"""l 1"""l N . ~ r-f rl N . r-f n 1"""l co M N N M M N N M M M rl M
....
0\ ....
~ ~~~~
H .., ~
~ I;!; l2;
1"""l · · M ~ 0 1"""l ~ N ~ r-- M M ~ 0 1"""l 1"""l 1"""l M co ~ M . '" M N 1"""l ~ ~ r-f 1"""l rl co co M 0 '" .., ~ . r--
o ~ ~ r-- M · 1"""l 0 rl M ~ ~ mo. N 0 0 0 . 0 ~ m co mOM M . 0 N N r-- r-- M '" ~ ~ ~ ~ 0
~ m ~ ~ ~ co ~ 0 ~ N co co ~ . 0 ~ 0 m m 1"""l M co '" 1"""l M . 0 ~ ~ MOO 0 0 co m ~ ~ N ~ rl
~ r-- N N M N co 0 M M N ~ N N r-- co 0 r-- r-- N m N N N N N '" 0 . N N 0 0 r-- r-- ~ ~ N N ~ N ~
N 0 0 0 N 0 0 1"""l 0 N 0 0 M 0 ~ 0 MOO N 1"""l 0 0 0 0 0 . ~ ~ M N M MOO 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
f< f<
>l >l
'" '"
f< ~ ~
H U U
~ ~ 3 3
U tI) CI) en
~
>l f<
~ ~
~ l:i ~ ~ ~
>l g ~ :l: f<
~ ~ ~ ~ ~
'"
~
~
j
C!l
~~
CI)
H '
..:IE-!
CI)~
ClOt)
~~
~~
~
t>
C
-rl
....
...
)J
~
....
...
f<
>l
~
'" ~ ~
~ s ~
~ ~ ~
o III
!il ~
~ t ~
~ ~ ~
~
~
~ ~ ~
~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ :;l
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~
~ ~
I") I-J 8 8
I;!; I;!; U U
~ ~
:c
U ~
l2; S ~
~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~
~
OIl;!;
~l:i :~ ~>l~>l
~ >l 0 f< f< ~ f< l2; I;!; 0 I;!;
8 U ~ H H ~ i H 0
~ E ~ I I ~ ~ ~ i i i i
~ ~ ~
gl H Ii!
~ a s
~
~ e ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~
0:
>l
'" '" Ii;
g g ~ i B ~ ~
i i I ~ I ~ I
t :il
~ 2
~ ~
H
'" ~ ,
o
o
....
....
...
f<
'"
I;!;
i
'"
....
....
:c
~ ~ '" ~ fil
f< ~ f;I:il :il ~ ~... !Ui
~ '" ~ '" ~ ~ ~ & :il :il I j ~ ~ ~ ~ f< f<
5 ~ ~ i ~ :c ~ Q 0: H ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0: :il ~ ~
>l ~ Q ~ ~ ~ U ~ ~ H :c ~:il f< ~ ~
~ : 2 ~ a : ~ ~ i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ g tl Ii! ~ ~ ;
~ : i ~ ffl a ~ i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ i ~ ~ ~ : ~
\0 COr- r-lOM 0 0-.,
2 ~ ~ : ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ g ~ ~ : : ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~
f< ~ ~ ~ ~ '" ~
en " po:; 0 0 ('r')
('j 0: '" U'I
;! S S f<:ri M
:~~~!2:
(I") rl rt rl 0
rt N N N U') j:l, llf
~
I:(l
~
~
H
~ D: C,!) 0 II)
~ ~ ~ ~ f< ~ ~
e ;!!I~i
0: III >l
~ ~ = ~ ~ ~ ~ =
>l ~ :il ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ : ~ :c ~
; g~2SO:"'~0:1;0:a~S&
I;!; ~:;l~~~l:lel~",~o: ~i5
~ EmQ~~>re~~&;f:!",~
~ g f<[;l~l:i~f<~~l2;gei~
~ gj~2j"~~~~"i~jj
o g S ~ ~ ~ U Q m $ ~ 5 ~ 8 ~
"'"
Qo.. \<\~
~ ~""
t: III \0 r-- ~ 0 ~;; ~ 0 rt'" (f')' Ltl r--
H NNNNMMf'1Ill\O\D\O\D\ON
H rt rt M rt rt rt rt rt M M M M N
P. t"'IMt"'IMM(Ylt"'l(f')f'1(f')M(f')(f')(f')
:J ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~
f;I
H
U
~ .. ~
0\ 0
: a::
~ ~ 2 2
j ~ ~ 2
Ii!
a
~ ..
H '"
"' ~
~ M
o
o III
~
~ 2
:c
:il f;:
....
~ ~
U ~
~
o
0\ ..
'" ....
....
co '"
.... ....
f<
'"
~
>l
Y ~
~ ~
~ l2;
I
~ 0.
~ 0
~ :
3 i
"
~
g
I
~
~
~
!
~
..-1;)--
..,)"
'"
0: ~
Q "-
~.. 0: ~
I;!; ~ !l:J
>l 0
~ 2 ~
H 0
~ ~ ~
~
~
H
~
~
I
'"
H
~
tl
J
~
~
~
&
~
H
:c
~ f< ~
P '" U
'" P
~ g: ~ I;!;
H 0 f<
~ ~ ~ B j ~
~ r:J ~ ~ ~ f< ;
e:~;~Jag
1;; 5 ~ ~ ~ I;!;
Q >4 ~ I&t C!J
o r:J 0 0 0 ~
......0............ ......1--1
o 2: u u ~ U H
U'I
f<
'"
~
f<
>l
!l:J
H
~
I;!;
~
~
r:J
~
..
'"
f<
'"
~
~
j
~
f<
'"
~
f<
>l
!l:J
H
~
I;!;
~
~
0:
,.,
H
l'l
'"
..
~
Q
o
"-
U
~
r:J
i
>l
~
'"
~ >l
~ i
III ~
f<
I 8 ~ i >l
~ .;3: !
~ ~ ~ '" ~ g: '" g:
>l Q ~ Ii! ~ : ~ ~ : ~ ~
'" '" ~ ~ & f< ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
! i ~ : ~ I I ! j ! !
~ ~ g ~ ~ i @ s ~ s s
~ ~ ! ~ tl ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
.....
~
J
~
0:
~ ~ ~ CI1
:c ~ ~ j :!
>l ~~ ~~~~ ~ ~f<
~ r&I ;< ~ f:i r&I ~ ~ D:
'" ~ ""QU~ ~~
~ 0. gl ~ ~ ~ ~ : '" ~ .., ~
i i i i ; ; : ! ! ; ! ~ ~ · i ;
~ ~ 2 2 ~ g i : : ~ ~ ~ ~ g ~ ~
f< ~ I '" '" I;!; 0: 5 5 " ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
$ ~ :;l ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 f< ~I;!; U
a ~ 0: v ,., ,., ~ ~ H >l 5 ~ 8 p
g ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ '" '" 5 '" ~ ~ 0: ~
~ ~
,
~'\;)
~,
.... '"
.... .. U'I
....
'"
....
~ ....
'" '"
'" '"
'" '"
.... ....
'\.. '" r-- r-- 0. 0. 01 0. 0 N 'iii' Ltl 1.0 I"'" 0. 0 rf 0. 0 rf rl N M 'iii'
~ 0. rf ('I') M M M (f') M 'iii' ~ 'iii' 'iii' 'iii' 'iii' 'iii' III Ltl Ltl \0 1.0 1.0 \D 1.0 1.0
N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N
EE SEE~EEa ~EEE8 8~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
I'l\
\
~
no.
:>;
'"
co
.,.
'"
0J
0J
rl
co
co
0J
"-
'"
"
'"
'"
'"
------------ ---