HomeMy WebLinkAbout20180307_DAnneAtherton_Slides_for_BOS_ISOBELSWY
SANKATY RDSCONSET AV
CLIFTON ST
WAY
ROSALYLN
NORTHSIAS RD
JENNIFERLN
EMILY ST
TOWADDY LNE L D R ID G E
L N ANNS LN
B AY B E R R YSIAS L N
COMEAU LNSCONSET AVISOBELS WY
BURNELL STPOLPIS RD
BAXTER RDSankaty Head
Town of NantucketGIS Mapsheet
The planimetric data on this mapsheet is based primarily upon interpretation of April, 2013 aerial photography. It was compiled to meet the ASPRS Standard for Class I Map Accuracy for 1"=100' scale maps.
The parcel boundaries are based primarily uponthe Tax Assessor's data through December, 2016.
Nantucket governmental agencies will not necessarily approve applications based soley on GIS data. Applicants for permits andlicensesmust inquire of the relevant agency for applicable requiements.
The presence of information of this mapsheet does not necessarily implypublic right-of-way or the right of public access.
The data on this mapsheet represents the efforts of the Town of Nantucket and other cooperating organizationsto record and compile pertinent geographical and relatedinformation utilizing the capabilities of the Nantucket GeographicInformation System (GIS). The GIS staff maintains an ongoing program to record and correct errors in these data that are broughtto its attention. The Town of Nantucket makes no claims as to theabsolute validity or reliability of these data or their fitness for any particular use.
Please send identification of any errorsand corresponding corrections to:
GIS Coordinator Town of Nantucket 2 Fairgrounds Rd Nantucket, MA 02554
2/1/2018
Data Sources:
350 0 350175 Feet
1 inch = 192 feet Legend
Town Land 2018
Parcels
49 9
48 8
48 6
This
decision
is
far
too
important
to
be
made
quickly.
The
BOS
can
make
a
local,
Nantucket
decision
—
or,
as
past
experience
has
shown,
control
of
the
decision
will
pass
to
the
state.
This
BOS
decision
will
create
policy
and
precedent
regarding
use
of
public
land
for
private
benefit.
Human
actions
along
the
coast
have
wide
coastal
impacts.
Therefore
it
is
critical
to
create
an
overall
coastal
resiliency
plan
—
and
the
Board
should
not
allow
actions
now
that
may
compromise
such
a
plan
even
before
it
is
developed.
In
the
coastal
resiliency
plan
and
in
this
decision,
the
BOS
should
work
to
prevent
residents
with
greater
economic
resources
from
adversely
impacting
either
our
beaches
or
coastal
residents
with
lesser
resources.
There
is
a
middle
way.
Move
forward
with
coastal
resiliency
plan.
In
the
meantime,
the
Town
can
support
filing
an
NOI
for
an
additional
three-‐year
permit
for
the
existing
900-‐foot
geotube
seawall,
consistent
with
the
current
permit.
Further
Background:
Geotube
seawalls
degrade
and
eventually
destroy
any
beach
on
which
they
are
installed.
The
science
is
irrefutable.
Attempts
to
mitigate
impact
on
the
beach
require
very
large,
ongoing
supplies
of
sand.
Serious
questions
exist
about
the
continuing
availability
of
appropriate
sand.
Further,
the
requirement
for
mitigation
sand
drives
up
the
price
of
sand
for
other
local
uses.