Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout01162015 Sewer Planning Work Group Minutes 1 2015 01 16 spwg minutes approved 2015 02 05 MEETING Minutes TOWN OF NANTUCKET Committee/Board/s SEWER PLANNING WORK GROUP Day, Date, and Time Frida, January 16, 2015, 9AM Location / Address 2 Fairgrounds, PLUS Conference Room 1. Call to order: Chair called meeting to order at 9:07. Attending: Matt Fee, Michael Glowacki, Dual Macintyre, Charlie Stott, Nancy Wheatley, and David Worth. Staff: DPW Director Buzanoski, Finance Director Turbitt; Woodard & Curran: Rosemary Blacquier and Helen Gordon 2. Review minutes from November and December 2014: Upon a motion by Mr. Fee, duly seconded, the revised minutes for 11/03/14 were approved unanimously. Upon a motion by Mr. Macintyre, duly seconded, the minutes for 12.08.14 were approved unanimously. 3. Sewer Criteria Checklist Final: Chair Wheatley reviewed the memo to the Board of Selectmen, requesting that Board to establish the work group recommendation as town policy, and asking that the Board notify the work group of any action taken on that request. By unanimous consent, the SPWG approved. 4. Consultants’ review of Draft CWMP Update needs areas recommendations: Chair Wheatley summarized the group’s progress to date in understanding the regulatory criteria that drive many of the recommendations of the draft CWMP update. Woodard &Curran provided further details in support of their recommendations and on how to prioritize needs areas of Somerset, Hummock Pond North and South, Miacomet; and, Monomoy and Shimmo, Chair Wheatley reiterated the group’s prior findings on the regulatory criteria and on responsible stewardship. Members observed that the public outreach as outlined in our adopted work plan will be most 2 2015 01 16 spwg minutes approved 2015 02 05 effective if it depicts what is going on in each of the needs areas, along with alternatives considered for each area. 5. Fiscal policy for allocation of capital costs: Finance Director Turbitt presented a mathematical model which explores the impact to the tax rate and / or to the betterment charge under various scenarios. Members suggested various scenarios and combinations which Mr. Turbitt demonstrated. Finance Director Turbitt indicated his intention to make the model available for individual members to explore. Further information needs identified:  Installation and annual maintenance costs for a typical septic system,  Projected interest rates on borrowing,  Projected annual operating cost per user (Is this expected to decline as new connections increase?). Members discussed some of the perceived inequities under the current funding practices with some possible fixes. Discussion centered on the general preference for a fresh start on allocating the capital costs, instead of attempting to fix the present practices. Next Meeting: February 5, 9 a.m. Allocation of Capital Costs, and Components of Public Outreach. Adjourned: